为什么美国人民不能公正地评判特朗普?他们的偏见从何而来?（一）
正文翻译
Why can't the US people judge Trump fairly? Where did their prejudice come from?
为什么美国人民不能公正地评判特朗普?他们的偏见从何而来?
Why can't the US people judge Trump fairly? Where did their prejudice come from?
为什么美国人民不能公正地评判特朗普?他们的偏见从何而来?
评论翻译
David Seibert
My in laws are republicans from southern New Jersey who had a family oil business. They can’t stand Trump because he ripped off all of their friends who tried to work with him, mainly by just refusing to pay people as he had agreed. He destroyed many small businesses. They aren’t prejudiced against him, they just know what he does.
我的姻亲是来自新泽西州南部的共和党人，他们有一家家族石油企业。他们无法忍受特朗普，因为他欺骗了所有试图与他合作的朋友，主要是通过拒绝按他的约定支付报酬。他摧毁了许多小企业。他们对他没有偏见，他们只是知道了他做了些什么。
My in laws are republicans from southern New Jersey who had a family oil business. They can’t stand Trump because he ripped off all of their friends who tried to work with him, mainly by just refusing to pay people as he had agreed. He destroyed many small businesses. They aren’t prejudiced against him, they just know what he does.
我的姻亲是来自新泽西州南部的共和党人，他们有一家家族石油企业。他们无法忍受特朗普，因为他欺骗了所有试图与他合作的朋友，主要是通过拒绝按他的约定支付报酬。他摧毁了许多小企业。他们对他没有偏见，他们只是知道了他做了些什么。
Tim Reilly
I think a lot of us have trouble judging him fairly / accurately because we’ve been raised to respect the Office of the President, the man (so far) who serves the country as POTUS, the esteemed men and women chosen to advise him, etc. We may have disagreed with specific policies or with some life choices, but I think we all believed the person in the office was there because he thought he could serve this country well. Thus, we are prejudiced into giving the POTUS the benefit of the doubt.
THIS POTUS, though, is something altogether different. He didn’t run with a strong desire to serve. He ran due to ego. He ran to show people he mattered and that Turns out he is governing that way, too.
So, no, the American people are not prepared to judge him fairly. Lots and lots of people keep going back to, “well, let’s support him, as he is POTUS, we should give him the benefit of the doubt and see where he takes us.” That’s exactly how a con artist takes your money.
我认为，我们中的很多人都很难公平/准确地评判他，因为我们从小就被教育要尊重总统办公室，尊重(到目前为止)作为总统为国家服务的人，尊重被选为总统顾问的受人尊敬的男女，等等。我们可能在某些具体政策或某些人生选择上存在分歧，但我认为我们都相信，总统之所以在那里，是因为他认为他能很好地为这个国家服务。因此，我们受到了偏见——假定总统无罪。
然而，这位美国总统却完全不同。他参选时并没有强烈的服务意愿。他因为自负而跑动，他跑动着去向人们展示他的重要性，事实证明，他也在以这种方式执政。
所以，不，美国人民不准备公平地评判他。很多人都会说，“好吧，让我们支持他，因为他是美国总统，我们应该假定他是无辜的，看看他会把我们带到哪里去。”骗子就是这么骗你的钱的。
I think a lot of us have trouble judging him fairly / accurately because we’ve been raised to respect the Office of the President, the man (so far) who serves the country as POTUS, the esteemed men and women chosen to advise him, etc. We may have disagreed with specific policies or with some life choices, but I think we all believed the person in the office was there because he thought he could serve this country well. Thus, we are prejudiced into giving the POTUS the benefit of the doubt.
THIS POTUS, though, is something altogether different. He didn’t run with a strong desire to serve. He ran due to ego. He ran to show people he mattered and that Turns out he is governing that way, too.
So, no, the American people are not prepared to judge him fairly. Lots and lots of people keep going back to, “well, let’s support him, as he is POTUS, we should give him the benefit of the doubt and see where he takes us.” That’s exactly how a con artist takes your money.
我认为，我们中的很多人都很难公平/准确地评判他，因为我们从小就被教育要尊重总统办公室，尊重(到目前为止)作为总统为国家服务的人，尊重被选为总统顾问的受人尊敬的男女，等等。我们可能在某些具体政策或某些人生选择上存在分歧，但我认为我们都相信，总统之所以在那里，是因为他认为他能很好地为这个国家服务。因此，我们受到了偏见——假定总统无罪。
然而，这位美国总统却完全不同。他参选时并没有强烈的服务意愿。他因为自负而跑动，他跑动着去向人们展示他的重要性，事实证明，他也在以这种方式执政。
所以，不，美国人民不准备公平地评判他。很多人都会说，“好吧，让我们支持他，因为他是美国总统，我们应该假定他是无辜的，看看他会把我们带到哪里去。”骗子就是这么骗你的钱的。
Scott Drager
I really don’t know why Americans don’t judge him fairly. The last poll I saw had him at an approval rating of close to 40%. I have no idea how it got that high. He conspired with Russia to win the election, he has gone bankrupt at least 5 times and he is obviously unsuited to be President. So it’s a mystery to me why he isn’t at 1–2% approval.
我真的不知道美国人为什么不公正地评价他。我上次看到的民调显示他的支持率接近40%。我不知道它怎么会这么高。他与俄罗斯合谋赢得大选，他至少破产了5次，显然不适合当总统了。所以对我来说，为什么他的支持率不是1-2%，这是一个谜。
I really don’t know why Americans don’t judge him fairly. The last poll I saw had him at an approval rating of close to 40%. I have no idea how it got that high. He conspired with Russia to win the election, he has gone bankrupt at least 5 times and he is obviously unsuited to be President. So it’s a mystery to me why he isn’t at 1–2% approval.
我真的不知道美国人为什么不公正地评价他。我上次看到的民调显示他的支持率接近40%。我不知道它怎么会这么高。他与俄罗斯合谋赢得大选，他至少破产了5次，显然不适合当总统了。所以对我来说，为什么他的支持率不是1-2%，这是一个谜。
Christopher Valdez
The trouble is, he is being judged on his own words.
In 2012, Trump harshly criticized Romney for not releasing his tax returns. In 2016, Trump did the same as Romney, proving himself to be a hypocrite.
He's insulted Blacks, women, Mexicans, and Jews.
He has bragged about not paying bills he didn't want to.
He lied about his inauguration crowds.
He has threatened to jail reporters, in violation of the Constitution. He has tried to set religious tests on immigrants, in violation of the Constitution. He's making money off being President, in violation of the Constitution.
Isn't that enough? How many chances are we supposed to give him?
问题是，人们根据他自己的话来评判他。
2012年，特朗普严厉批评罗姆尼(Romney)没有公布他的纳税申报单。2016年，特朗普和罗姆尼做了同样的事，这证明他自己是个伪君子。
他侮辱了黑人、妇女、墨西哥人和犹太人。
他曾吹嘘自己不付那些不想付的账单。
他对就职典礼的人群撒了谎。
他曾威胁要监禁记者，这违反了宪法。他曾试图对移民进行宗教测试，这违反了宪法。他靠当总统赚钱，这违反了宪法。
这还不够吗？我们应该给他多少机会？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The trouble is, he is being judged on his own words.
In 2012, Trump harshly criticized Romney for not releasing his tax returns. In 2016, Trump did the same as Romney, proving himself to be a hypocrite.
He's insulted Blacks, women, Mexicans, and Jews.
He has bragged about not paying bills he didn't want to.
He lied about his inauguration crowds.
He has threatened to jail reporters, in violation of the Constitution. He has tried to set religious tests on immigrants, in violation of the Constitution. He's making money off being President, in violation of the Constitution.
Isn't that enough? How many chances are we supposed to give him?
问题是，人们根据他自己的话来评判他。
2012年，特朗普严厉批评罗姆尼(Romney)没有公布他的纳税申报单。2016年，特朗普和罗姆尼做了同样的事，这证明他自己是个伪君子。
他侮辱了黑人、妇女、墨西哥人和犹太人。
他曾吹嘘自己不付那些不想付的账单。
他对就职典礼的人群撒了谎。
他曾威胁要监禁记者，这违反了宪法。他曾试图对移民进行宗教测试，这违反了宪法。他靠当总统赚钱，这违反了宪法。
这还不够吗？我们应该给他多少机会？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Samuel Albro
Trump has done nothing to earn my trust, faith, or vote. He has done much to earn my distrust of him and my lack of faith in him. At first, I gave him the “benefit of the doubt,” yet he has proven to be worthy of that which you call “prejudice” and being “unfairly judged.”
I don't want a man to lead our country if the most important thing he has to do on a Sunday morning is tweet about a show which gives us nonsupporters of his regime a chance to laugh at his ignorance, his blatant disrespect of our Constitutional rights, his outspoken racism/sexism, his bold faced lies (even more appalling for their obviousness), his complete disregard for anything not branded TRUMP,…. and much much more.
I don't judge him unfairly. I'm neither Republican nor Democrat, tho maybe a little of both. As an American, I cannot believe the man even cares one whit about the welfare of our nation. He has proven beyond even any of my unreasonable doubts that he is merely an egocentric worthy of any and all criticism that heads his way. The fact remains that he has huge responsibilities (the biggest) to our country. Instead of trying to incorporate all Americans, he has done almost everything in his power to pit us one against another.
In conclusion, the only way to make America great again is to get rid of the who has done nothing but make America the laughing stock of the world.
特朗普做的任何事都没有赢得我的信任、信仰或选票。他做了很多事，使我对他失去了信任。起初，我假定他是无辜的，但事实证明，他配得上你所说的“偏见”和“不公正的评判”。
我不想要这样一人来领导我们的国家：他在周日早上要做的最重要的事情就是发推特谈论一场节目，让我们这些不支持他的人有机会嘲笑他的无知，嘲笑他公然不尊重我们的宪法权利，嘲笑他直言不讳的种族主义/性别歧视、他大胆说谎（更可怕的是，这些谎言显而易见），他完全无视任何没有特朗普标签的东西....还有更多。
我对他没有不公正的评价。我既不是共和党人也不是民主党人，但可能两者都有一点。作为一个美国人，我是不敢相信这个人会关心我们国家的福祉的。他已经证明，他完全是一个以自我为中心的人，配得上任何和所有的批评。事实仍然如此，他对我们国家负有重大责任。他没有试图团结所有美国人，而是尽其所能让我们彼此对立。
总之，让美国再次伟大的唯一方法是摆脱那个只会让美国成为世界笑柄的人。
Trump has done nothing to earn my trust, faith, or vote. He has done much to earn my distrust of him and my lack of faith in him. At first, I gave him the “benefit of the doubt,” yet he has proven to be worthy of that which you call “prejudice” and being “unfairly judged.”
I don't want a man to lead our country if the most important thing he has to do on a Sunday morning is tweet about a show which gives us nonsupporters of his regime a chance to laugh at his ignorance, his blatant disrespect of our Constitutional rights, his outspoken racism/sexism, his bold faced lies (even more appalling for their obviousness), his complete disregard for anything not branded TRUMP,…. and much much more.
I don't judge him unfairly. I'm neither Republican nor Democrat, tho maybe a little of both. As an American, I cannot believe the man even cares one whit about the welfare of our nation. He has proven beyond even any of my unreasonable doubts that he is merely an egocentric worthy of any and all criticism that heads his way. The fact remains that he has huge responsibilities (the biggest) to our country. Instead of trying to incorporate all Americans, he has done almost everything in his power to pit us one against another.
In conclusion, the only way to make America great again is to get rid of the who has done nothing but make America the laughing stock of the world.
特朗普做的任何事都没有赢得我的信任、信仰或选票。他做了很多事，使我对他失去了信任。起初，我假定他是无辜的，但事实证明，他配得上你所说的“偏见”和“不公正的评判”。
我不想要这样一人来领导我们的国家：他在周日早上要做的最重要的事情就是发推特谈论一场节目，让我们这些不支持他的人有机会嘲笑他的无知，嘲笑他公然不尊重我们的宪法权利，嘲笑他直言不讳的种族主义/性别歧视、他大胆说谎（更可怕的是，这些谎言显而易见），他完全无视任何没有特朗普标签的东西....还有更多。
我对他没有不公正的评价。我既不是共和党人也不是民主党人，但可能两者都有一点。作为一个美国人，我是不敢相信这个人会关心我们国家的福祉的。他已经证明，他完全是一个以自我为中心的人，配得上任何和所有的批评。事实仍然如此，他对我们国家负有重大责任。他没有试图团结所有美国人，而是尽其所能让我们彼此对立。
总之，让美国再次伟大的唯一方法是摆脱那个只会让美国成为世界笑柄的人。
Elesa Zehndorfer
Prejudice would mean that the US hates Trump on account of his race, or gender, and so on. Rightful disdain would mean that he is taken on his merits, which, as it turns out, are very scarce, and found wanting.
As he seems proud of his racist, misogynistic, obnoxious, ignorant, self-promoting statements and actions, and lies a LOT, clearly there is rationale for this disdain. Everything I have said can be backed up extensively by fact and is therefore not prejudice, but a reflection of the fact that he is an appalling POTUS.
偏见意味着美国因为特朗普的种族、性别等等而讨厌他。正确的蔑视意味着他会根据自己的优点行事，而事实证明，他的优点是非常稀少的，而且是欠缺的。
他似乎对自己的种族主义、厌恶女性、令人讨厌、无知、自我推销的言论和行为感到自豪，而且多次撒谎，显然这种蔑视是有理由的。我所说的一切都有广泛的事实支持，因此这不是偏见，而是反映了一个事实，那就是他是一个使人憎恶的总统。
Prejudice would mean that the US hates Trump on account of his race, or gender, and so on. Rightful disdain would mean that he is taken on his merits, which, as it turns out, are very scarce, and found wanting.
As he seems proud of his racist, misogynistic, obnoxious, ignorant, self-promoting statements and actions, and lies a LOT, clearly there is rationale for this disdain. Everything I have said can be backed up extensively by fact and is therefore not prejudice, but a reflection of the fact that he is an appalling POTUS.
偏见意味着美国因为特朗普的种族、性别等等而讨厌他。正确的蔑视意味着他会根据自己的优点行事，而事实证明，他的优点是非常稀少的，而且是欠缺的。
他似乎对自己的种族主义、厌恶女性、令人讨厌、无知、自我推销的言论和行为感到自豪，而且多次撒谎，显然这种蔑视是有理由的。我所说的一切都有广泛的事实支持，因此这不是偏见，而是反映了一个事实，那就是他是一个使人憎恶的总统。
Ann Marie Hoff
Strange isn't it, that when you take your sick nephew off of medical support, mimic a handicapped reporter, call Mexicans Rapists, get caught on tape lying multiple times a day, and break the law by not ceasing to run your business even though it’s illegal not to, that SOME PEOPLE DON{T LIKE YOU? Trump is egotistical, mean, petty, unintelligent, noncre...
奇怪的是，当你让你生病的侄子停止医疗支持，模仿一个残疾记者，称墨西哥人为强奸犯，每天被拍到多次说谎，违反法律，即使违法也不停止经营，有些人不喜欢你，不是吗?，即使不这样做是违法的，有些人不喜欢你？特朗普自私、刻薄、小气、愚蠢、无趣……
Strange isn't it, that when you take your sick nephew off of medical support, mimic a handicapped reporter, call Mexicans Rapists, get caught on tape lying multiple times a day, and break the law by not ceasing to run your business even though it’s illegal not to, that SOME PEOPLE DON{T LIKE YOU? Trump is egotistical, mean, petty, unintelligent, noncre...
奇怪的是，当你让你生病的侄子停止医疗支持，模仿一个残疾记者，称墨西哥人为强奸犯，每天被拍到多次说谎，违反法律，即使违法也不停止经营，有些人不喜欢你，不是吗?，即使不这样做是违法的，有些人不喜欢你？特朗普自私、刻薄、小气、愚蠢、无趣……
Michael Cozad
There is a clear record of his cheating people.
There is a clear record of his not wishing to rent to non-whites.
There is a clear record of his saying, “I know more than - -” on a subject. And then showing he knows nothing about the subject.
The list of subject include things that a President should know.
Better than of the subjects half being things that people expect that a person with a college degree, from a major college, would know.
Trump does not know these things.
If you hear him say, “I know - - ,” start listening intently. Occasional there is going to be a subject you know something about. Listen to see if he appears to know anything. Or, if he is deflect away from saying anything.
Unless you know nothing about nothing like Trump. You are going to hear him say something totally stupid, or avoid saying the simplest thing, on subject you know something about.
If you care about your country. It is your right, and responsibility, to listen carefully to the President.
Trump is that most of what he says is BS.
Come on. He is making Bush II look like a genius.
他欺骗别人的事情被记录得很清楚。
有明确的记录表明他不希望把房子租给非白人。
有一份记录清楚的显示，他曾说过:“我知道的比……多。”然后的表现显示他对这个主题一无所知。
主题清单包括总统应该知道的事情。
超过一半的科目是那些期望拥有大学学位的人、期望从一个重点大学毕业的人，会知道的事情。
特朗普不知道这些事情。
如果你听到他说“我知道——”，就开始专心听。偶尔会有一个你有所了解的主题。看看他是否知道什么。或者，如果他什么都不说。
除非你对特朗普一无所知。你们会听到他说一些完全愚蠢的话，或者避免在你所知道的领域说最质朴的话。
如果你关心你的国家。认真听取总统的意见是你们的权利和责任。
特朗普大部分时间都在说废话。
拜托，他让布什二世看起来像个天才。
There is a clear record of his cheating people.
There is a clear record of his not wishing to rent to non-whites.
There is a clear record of his saying, “I know more than - -” on a subject. And then showing he knows nothing about the subject.
The list of subject include things that a President should know.
Better than of the subjects half being things that people expect that a person with a college degree, from a major college, would know.
Trump does not know these things.
If you hear him say, “I know - - ,” start listening intently. Occasional there is going to be a subject you know something about. Listen to see if he appears to know anything. Or, if he is deflect away from saying anything.
Unless you know nothing about nothing like Trump. You are going to hear him say something totally stupid, or avoid saying the simplest thing, on subject you know something about.
If you care about your country. It is your right, and responsibility, to listen carefully to the President.
Trump is that most of what he says is BS.
Come on. He is making Bush II look like a genius.
他欺骗别人的事情被记录得很清楚。
有明确的记录表明他不希望把房子租给非白人。
有一份记录清楚的显示，他曾说过:“我知道的比……多。”然后的表现显示他对这个主题一无所知。
主题清单包括总统应该知道的事情。
超过一半的科目是那些期望拥有大学学位的人、期望从一个重点大学毕业的人，会知道的事情。
特朗普不知道这些事情。
如果你听到他说“我知道——”，就开始专心听。偶尔会有一个你有所了解的主题。看看他是否知道什么。或者，如果他什么都不说。
除非你对特朗普一无所知。你们会听到他说一些完全愚蠢的话，或者避免在你所知道的领域说最质朴的话。
如果你关心你的国家。认真听取总统的意见是你们的权利和责任。
特朗普大部分时间都在说废话。
拜托，他让布什二世看起来像个天才。
Kevin Connery
Why can't the US people judge Trump fairly? Where did their prejudice come from?
By starting the question with ‘Why’, you’re presupposing the question is valid, and that’s really the point you’re trying to make. That’s the petitio principii fallacy.
As others have noted, most people, Americans and others, are judging him fairly.
They’re judging him on the words he speaks (and then denies having spoken).
They’re judging him on the actions he takes (and then denies having taken).
They’re judging him on the accusations he makes, then refused to provide any evidence for the outrageous claims.
They’re judging him on the false statements he’s made, in the face of evidence to the contrary.
What method would you prefer he be judged on? His unsupported claims, ignoring reality? That’s unlikely to happen; most people can only be fooled for so long before it becomes obvious that the emperor has no clothes.
为什么美国人民不能公正地评判特朗普？他们的偏见是从哪里来的？
以“为什么”作为问题的开头，你是在假设这个问题是有效的，这才是你真正想要表达的吧，这就是请愿原则谬论。
正如其他人所指出的，大多数人，无论是美国人还是其他国家的人，对他的评价都是公正的。
他们根据他说的话来评判他（然后否认说过）。
他们根据他所采取的行动来评判他（然后否认采取了行动）。
他们根据他提出的指控来评判他，然后拒绝为这些离谱的指控提供任何证据。
他们在面对相反证据的情况下，根据他的虚假陈述来评判他。
你希望用什么方法来评判他？他无视现实的毫无根据的主张？这种情况不太可能发生；大多数人只能被愚弄很长时间，然后才发现皇帝没有衣服。
Why can't the US people judge Trump fairly? Where did their prejudice come from?
By starting the question with ‘Why’, you’re presupposing the question is valid, and that’s really the point you’re trying to make. That’s the petitio principii fallacy.
As others have noted, most people, Americans and others, are judging him fairly.
They’re judging him on the words he speaks (and then denies having spoken).
They’re judging him on the actions he takes (and then denies having taken).
They’re judging him on the accusations he makes, then refused to provide any evidence for the outrageous claims.
They’re judging him on the false statements he’s made, in the face of evidence to the contrary.
What method would you prefer he be judged on? His unsupported claims, ignoring reality? That’s unlikely to happen; most people can only be fooled for so long before it becomes obvious that the emperor has no clothes.
为什么美国人民不能公正地评判特朗普？他们的偏见是从哪里来的？
以“为什么”作为问题的开头，你是在假设这个问题是有效的，这才是你真正想要表达的吧，这就是请愿原则谬论。
正如其他人所指出的，大多数人，无论是美国人还是其他国家的人，对他的评价都是公正的。
他们根据他说的话来评判他（然后否认说过）。
他们根据他所采取的行动来评判他（然后否认采取了行动）。
他们根据他提出的指控来评判他，然后拒绝为这些离谱的指控提供任何证据。
他们在面对相反证据的情况下，根据他的虚假陈述来评判他。
你希望用什么方法来评判他？他无视现实的毫无根据的主张？这种情况不太可能发生；大多数人只能被愚弄很长时间，然后才发现皇帝没有衣服。
Dave Haynie
Q: Why can't the US people judge Trump fairly? Where did their prejudice come from?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Did you spot your flaw?
Many people in the US absolutely do judge Trump fairly. We actually followed the rise of Trump into politics, going back to 2011 or so when he decided to sell a fictional story about President Obama not being born in the USA. We were actually paying attention when Trump employed an endless barrage of lies and 5th grade playground techniques, name calling, etc. to somehow win the Republican nomination for President. We didn’t miss the 3.5 lies he told per minute during his debates with Hillary Clinton. We didn’t forget the various reports of his racially profiling renters
We also saw how Trump can barely speak at a fifth grade level. How he has trouble concentrating on a topic. How he has demonstrated, again and again, he doesn’t have the most basic understanding of government or the complexities of the world. He’s a successful saleman, huckster, and con-man, but not Presidential material. Not capable of leading. And on that, he has not disappointed…he’s worse than most people who did pay attention in class would have expected.
In short, we know that guy.
Some better than others. I grew up in central Jersey and settled in South Jersey after college, so I have known this guy for years. I didn’t forget that Trump was all mobbed up in the early days of his construction business. I didn’t miss the dozens of contractors he hurt or put out of business while building his various Atlantic City casinos, part of his business model being the routine cheating of contractors, knowing they can’t afford to fight back. I was actually rather happy when he stopped building things himself and just licensed the name, then when he decided to be a TV game show host. At least people weren’t getting hurt… maybe.
为什么美国人民不能公正地评判特朗普？他们的偏见是从哪里来的？
你一直在用“偏见”这个词，我是觉得你并不认为它是偏见。
你发现你的缺点了吗？
许多美国人对特朗普的评价绝对是公正的。事实上，我们关注的是特朗普从政的过程，可以追溯到2011年左右，当时他决定出售一个关于奥巴马总统不是在美国出生的虚构故事。当特朗普用无休止的谎言和五年级的操场技巧、谩骂等手段以某种方式赢得共和党总统候选人提名时，我们实际上一直关注着他。我们没有错过他在与希拉里·克林顿的辩论中每分钟说3.5个谎言这一事件。我们没有忘记关于他对租客进行种族歧视的各种报道。
我们还看到了特朗普那五年级的说话水平——他很难集中注意力在一个话题上。我们还看到了他是如何一次又一次地证明，他对政府或世界的复杂性没有最基本的了解。他是一个成功的推销员、小贩和骗子，但不是当总统的料。没有领导能力的。在这一点上，他并没有让人失望……他比大多数在课堂上认真听讲的人要差——这也是预期到的。
简而言之，我们知道这个人。
有些方面比其他人好。我在新泽西州中部长大，大学毕业后定居在新泽西州南部，所以我认识这个人很多年了。我没有忘记，特朗普在他的建筑事业的早期就被人团团围住过。我没有错过他在建造大西洋城赌场时伤害或让数十名承包商破产的情况，他的商业模式的一部分就是对承包商进行常规欺骗，因为他知道他们无力反击。事实上，当他不再自己建造东西，而只是授权自己的名字时，当他决定成为一名电视游戏节目主持人时，我相当高兴。至少没有人受伤，也许吧。
Q: Why can't the US people judge Trump fairly? Where did their prejudice come from?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Did you spot your flaw?
Many people in the US absolutely do judge Trump fairly. We actually followed the rise of Trump into politics, going back to 2011 or so when he decided to sell a fictional story about President Obama not being born in the USA. We were actually paying attention when Trump employed an endless barrage of lies and 5th grade playground techniques, name calling, etc. to somehow win the Republican nomination for President. We didn’t miss the 3.5 lies he told per minute during his debates with Hillary Clinton. We didn’t forget the various reports of his racially profiling renters
We also saw how Trump can barely speak at a fifth grade level. How he has trouble concentrating on a topic. How he has demonstrated, again and again, he doesn’t have the most basic understanding of government or the complexities of the world. He’s a successful saleman, huckster, and con-man, but not Presidential material. Not capable of leading. And on that, he has not disappointed…he’s worse than most people who did pay attention in class would have expected.
In short, we know that guy.
Some better than others. I grew up in central Jersey and settled in South Jersey after college, so I have known this guy for years. I didn’t forget that Trump was all mobbed up in the early days of his construction business. I didn’t miss the dozens of contractors he hurt or put out of business while building his various Atlantic City casinos, part of his business model being the routine cheating of contractors, knowing they can’t afford to fight back. I was actually rather happy when he stopped building things himself and just licensed the name, then when he decided to be a TV game show host. At least people weren’t getting hurt… maybe.
为什么美国人民不能公正地评判特朗普？他们的偏见是从哪里来的？
你一直在用“偏见”这个词，我是觉得你并不认为它是偏见。
你发现你的缺点了吗？
许多美国人对特朗普的评价绝对是公正的。事实上，我们关注的是特朗普从政的过程，可以追溯到2011年左右，当时他决定出售一个关于奥巴马总统不是在美国出生的虚构故事。当特朗普用无休止的谎言和五年级的操场技巧、谩骂等手段以某种方式赢得共和党总统候选人提名时，我们实际上一直关注着他。我们没有错过他在与希拉里·克林顿的辩论中每分钟说3.5个谎言这一事件。我们没有忘记关于他对租客进行种族歧视的各种报道。
我们还看到了特朗普那五年级的说话水平——他很难集中注意力在一个话题上。我们还看到了他是如何一次又一次地证明，他对政府或世界的复杂性没有最基本的了解。他是一个成功的推销员、小贩和骗子，但不是当总统的料。没有领导能力的。在这一点上，他并没有让人失望……他比大多数在课堂上认真听讲的人要差——这也是预期到的。
简而言之，我们知道这个人。
有些方面比其他人好。我在新泽西州中部长大，大学毕业后定居在新泽西州南部，所以我认识这个人很多年了。我没有忘记，特朗普在他的建筑事业的早期就被人团团围住过。我没有错过他在建造大西洋城赌场时伤害或让数十名承包商破产的情况，他的商业模式的一部分就是对承包商进行常规欺骗，因为他知道他们无力反击。事实上，当他不再自己建造东西，而只是授权自己的名字时，当他决定成为一名电视游戏节目主持人时，我相当高兴。至少没有人受伤，也许吧。
David W. Rudlin
Because he’s not the president.
He’s a criminal defendant.
And for the guy who refers to the actual president as “Sleepy Joe” and “a dumb son of a bitch” to complain he isn’t being treated with appropriate respect is hysterical and pathetic in equal measure.
因为他不是总统。
他是刑事被告。
而对于一个把现任总统称为“瞌睡虫乔”和“愚蠢的狗娘养的”的人来说，抱怨自己没有得到应有的尊重，既歇斯底里又可悲。
Because he’s not the president.
He’s a criminal defendant.
And for the guy who refers to the actual president as “Sleepy Joe” and “a dumb son of a bitch” to complain he isn’t being treated with appropriate respect is hysterical and pathetic in equal measure.
因为他不是总统。
他是刑事被告。
而对于一个把现任总统称为“瞌睡虫乔”和“愚蠢的狗娘养的”的人来说，抱怨自己没有得到应有的尊重，既歇斯底里又可悲。
Judy Rofe
donald trump was enraged as he exited the courtroom after his third arraignment. So what’s new? He’s been apoplectic for years.
He’s an ex-president, who for the record, never, not one single time, won the popular vote. Despite being sent packing from the Oval Office more than two years ago, he's gotten accustomed to being addressed as "Mr. President" by supporters at his Bedminster golf club and Mar-a-Lago. Both private venues.
But when Judge Moxila Upadhyaya dared to address him throughout his arraignment as Mr trump rather than 'president,' she inadvertently had him foaming at the mouth at the alleged disrespect he suffered at her negligence.
Official titles and even honorary ones are frequently abandoned in a court of law, which is trump's second home. Titles psychologically restrict a jury and judge's ability to appropriately weigh the factors that play a role in sentencing.
Here's why titles like President, Doctor, Lieutenant Colonel, Governor, and so on are rarely used in court. They carry enormous weight and can sway a jury one way or the other.
唐纳德·特朗普在第三次传讯后离开法庭时勃然大怒。有什么新鲜事吗?他多年来就如此易怒。
他是前总统，郑重声明，他从来没有，一次也没有赢得过普选。尽管两年多前他就被赶出了椭圆形办公室，但他已经习惯了在贝德明斯特高尔夫俱乐部和海湖庄园被支持者称为“总统先生”——这两处地方都是私人场地。
但当法官Moxila Upadhyaya在整个传讯过程中敢于称呼他为“特朗普先生”而不是“总统”时，她无意中让特朗普怒火中烧，由于她的疏忽大意，他受到了所谓的不尊重。
法庭是特朗普的第二个家，在这里，官方头衔甚至荣誉头衔都经常被放弃。头衔在心理上限制了陪审团和法官适当权衡量刑因素的能力。
这就是为什么总统、医生、中校、州长等头衔很少在法庭上使用的原因。它们具有巨大的影响力，可以以某种方式左右陪审团。
donald trump was enraged as he exited the courtroom after his third arraignment. So what’s new? He’s been apoplectic for years.
He’s an ex-president, who for the record, never, not one single time, won the popular vote. Despite being sent packing from the Oval Office more than two years ago, he's gotten accustomed to being addressed as "Mr. President" by supporters at his Bedminster golf club and Mar-a-Lago. Both private venues.
But when Judge Moxila Upadhyaya dared to address him throughout his arraignment as Mr trump rather than 'president,' she inadvertently had him foaming at the mouth at the alleged disrespect he suffered at her negligence.
Official titles and even honorary ones are frequently abandoned in a court of law, which is trump's second home. Titles psychologically restrict a jury and judge's ability to appropriately weigh the factors that play a role in sentencing.
Here's why titles like President, Doctor, Lieutenant Colonel, Governor, and so on are rarely used in court. They carry enormous weight and can sway a jury one way or the other.
唐纳德·特朗普在第三次传讯后离开法庭时勃然大怒。有什么新鲜事吗?他多年来就如此易怒。
他是前总统，郑重声明，他从来没有，一次也没有赢得过普选。尽管两年多前他就被赶出了椭圆形办公室，但他已经习惯了在贝德明斯特高尔夫俱乐部和海湖庄园被支持者称为“总统先生”——这两处地方都是私人场地。
但当法官Moxila Upadhyaya在整个传讯过程中敢于称呼他为“特朗普先生”而不是“总统”时，她无意中让特朗普怒火中烧，由于她的疏忽大意，他受到了所谓的不尊重。
法庭是特朗普的第二个家，在这里，官方头衔甚至荣誉头衔都经常被放弃。头衔在心理上限制了陪审团和法官适当权衡量刑因素的能力。
这就是为什么总统、医生、中校、州长等头衔很少在法庭上使用的原因。它们具有巨大的影响力，可以以某种方式左右陪审团。
Will you, the jury convict Mrs Smith? Maybe.
Would you actually convict Dr Smith? Now, that's a tough one.
Are you, the jury going to convict Mr trump? Yeah, we can possibly do that.
Are you actually going to convict President trump?
Psychologically, the title becomes paramount and is the catalyst. So, the removal of a person's title alters the public’s perception of them .
Stripping a person of their title during a trial in a court of law provides the reality they are a human being just like you or I. There is no impressive ‘wow’ factor to influence the decision-making processes.
It would be far more difficult for a jury to convict president trump than Mr trump. Not because of the gravity of what he did; that remains unchanged; but the title, when repeated enough in a courtroom, will sway the jury's view one way or the other.
陪审团，你会判史密斯夫人有罪吗?也许吧。
你真的会判史密斯医生有罪吗？现在，这是一个艰难的问题。
你会判特朗普有罪吗？是的，我们有可能这样做。
你真的要给特朗普总统定罪吗？
从心理上讲，头衔是最重要的，是催化剂。因此，去掉一个人的头衔改变了公众对他们的看法。
在法庭审判期间剥夺一个人的头衔，就可以证明他们是和你或我一样的人。没有令人印象深刻的“哇”的因素来影响决策过程。
陪审团判定特朗普总统有罪要比判定特朗普先生有罪困难得多。这与他所做的事情的严重性无关，做的事情性质保持不变；但当这个头衔在法庭上反复出现时，会以某种方式影响陪审团的观点。
Would you actually convict Dr Smith? Now, that's a tough one.
Are you, the jury going to convict Mr trump? Yeah, we can possibly do that.
Are you actually going to convict President trump?
Psychologically, the title becomes paramount and is the catalyst. So, the removal of a person's title alters the public’s perception of them .
Stripping a person of their title during a trial in a court of law provides the reality they are a human being just like you or I. There is no impressive ‘wow’ factor to influence the decision-making processes.
It would be far more difficult for a jury to convict president trump than Mr trump. Not because of the gravity of what he did; that remains unchanged; but the title, when repeated enough in a courtroom, will sway the jury's view one way or the other.
陪审团，你会判史密斯夫人有罪吗?也许吧。
你真的会判史密斯医生有罪吗？现在，这是一个艰难的问题。
你会判特朗普有罪吗？是的，我们有可能这样做。
你真的要给特朗普总统定罪吗？
从心理上讲，头衔是最重要的，是催化剂。因此，去掉一个人的头衔改变了公众对他们的看法。
在法庭审判期间剥夺一个人的头衔，就可以证明他们是和你或我一样的人。没有令人印象深刻的“哇”的因素来影响决策过程。
陪审团判定特朗普总统有罪要比判定特朗普先生有罪困难得多。这与他所做的事情的严重性无关，做的事情性质保持不变；但当这个头衔在法庭上反复出现时，会以某种方式影响陪审团的观点。
很赞 1
收藏