比亚迪的仰望U9 售价236000美元：0-100 公里/小时仅需 2.36 秒，配备LFP（磷酸铁锂）电池
正文翻译
YangWang U9 launched in China with a single option priced at 1.68 million yuan (236,000 USD). The all-electric supercar sits on the e4 platform and is equipped with BYD’s Disus X suspension system, which enables it to drive on three wheels, jump, or dance. Four electric motors power the EV with a total output of 960 kW (1287 hp) and 1,680 Nm peak torque.
比亚迪仰望U9在中国推出，单一选项售价为168万元人民币（236,000美元）。这款全电动超级跑车基于 e4 平台，配备比亚迪的 Disus X 悬架系统，使其能够实现三轮驱动、跳跃或跳舞。该电动汽车由四台电动机提供动力，总输出功率为 960 kW（1287 hp），峰值扭矩为 1,680 Nm。
YangWang U9 launched in China with a single option priced at 1.68 million yuan (236,000 USD). The all-electric supercar sits on the e4 platform and is equipped with BYD’s Disus X suspension system, which enables it to drive on three wheels, jump, or dance. Four electric motors power the EV with a total output of 960 kW (1287 hp) and 1,680 Nm peak torque.
比亚迪仰望U9在中国推出，单一选项售价为168万元人民币（236,000美元）。这款全电动超级跑车基于 e4 平台，配备比亚迪的 Disus X 悬架系统，使其能够实现三轮驱动、跳跃或跳舞。该电动汽车由四台电动机提供动力，总输出功率为 960 kW（1287 hp），峰值扭矩为 1,680 Nm。
U9, which stands for Ultimate 9 according to BYD, is AWD and can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 2.36 seconds, and drag race time for 400 meters (quarter mile) is 9.78 seconds, according to BYD. The electric motor can spin at 21,000 rpm. Interestingly, unlike other high-end cars, the car is not equipped with an NCM chemistry battery but features BYD’s lithium iron phosphate (LFP) Blade battery pack.
据比亚迪介绍，U9是Ultimate 9的缩写，它是全轮驱动的，0-100公里/小时加速只需2.36秒，400米（四分之一英里）的直线加速赛时间为9.78秒。电动机的转速可达 21,000 rpm。有趣的是，与其他高端汽车不同的是，该车并未配备NCM（三元锂）化学电池，而是配备了比亚迪的磷酸铁锂（LFP）刀片电池组。
据比亚迪介绍，U9是Ultimate 9的缩写，它是全轮驱动的，0-100公里/小时加速只需2.36秒，400米（四分之一英里）的直线加速赛时间为9.78秒。电动机的转速可达 21,000 rpm。有趣的是，与其他高端汽车不同的是，该车并未配备NCM（三元锂）化学电池，而是配备了比亚迪的磷酸铁锂（LFP）刀片电池组。
The official top speed of YangWang U9 is 309.19 km/h. It was tested on the famous Shanghai International Circuit, reaching the official lap time of 2 minutes, 17 seconds, and 65 milliseconds. Here are the times of other cars for comparison:
仰望U9的官方最高时速为309.19公里/小时。它在著名的上海国际赛车场进行了测试，达到了官方单圈时间2分17秒65毫秒。以下是其他车的时间对比：
仰望U9的官方最高时速为309.19公里/小时。它在著名的上海国际赛车场进行了测试，达到了官方单圈时间2分17秒65毫秒。以下是其他车的时间对比：
Nio EP9: 2 minutes, 01 seconds, and 11 milliseconds
蔚来 EP9：2分01秒11毫秒
蔚来 EP9：2分01秒11毫秒
BMW M5 F90: 2 minutes, 22 seconds, and 828 milliseconds
BMW M5 F90：2分22秒828毫秒
BMW M5 F90：2分22秒828毫秒
Porsche Panamera Turbo: 2 minutes 27 seconds, and 727 milliseconds
保时捷 Panamera Turbo：2 分 27 秒 727 毫秒
保时捷 Panamera Turbo：2 分 27 秒 727 毫秒
The YangWang U9’s dimensions are (L/H/W) 4966/2029/1295 mm with a wheelbase of 2900 mm (195.51/79.88/50.98 inches with a wheelbase of 114.17 inches). The LFP battery on board has a capacity of 80 kWh, good for 465 km of CLTC range. The maximum charging power is 500 kW, and the battery pack weighs 633 kg (1395.45 pounds). The car has a 2,475 kg (5,456 pounds) curb weight, which is quite a lot for the supercar.
仰望U9的尺寸为（长/高/宽）4966/2029/1295毫米，轴距为2900毫米（195.51/79.88/50.98英寸，轴距为114.17英寸）。车载磷酸铁锂电池容量为80kWh，CLTC续航里程为465公里。最大充电功率为500千瓦，电池组重量为633公斤（1395.45磅）。该车的整备质量为 2,475 公斤（5,456 磅），对于超级跑车来说相当大了。
仰望U9的尺寸为（长/高/宽）4966/2029/1295毫米，轴距为2900毫米（195.51/79.88/50.98英寸，轴距为114.17英寸）。车载磷酸铁锂电池容量为80kWh，CLTC续航里程为465公里。最大充电功率为500千瓦，电池组重量为633公斤（1395.45磅）。该车的整备质量为 2,475 公斤（5,456 磅），对于超级跑车来说相当大了。
U9 features 800V architecture and can charge from 30% to 80% in 10 minutes. The supercar also supports dual charging, meaning you can plug in two independent charging guns simultaneously. That is nothing new for BYD, as their Denza D9 and N7 already support this technology and sparked some controversies about charging station occupation.
U9采用800V架构，10分钟可充电30%至80%。这款超级跑车还支持双充电，这意味着您可以同时插入两个独立的充电枪。这对于比亚迪来说并不是什么新鲜事，他们的腾势D9和N7已经支持这项技术，并引发了一些关于充电站占用的争议。
U9采用800V架构，10分钟可充电30%至80%。这款超级跑车还支持双充电，这意味着您可以同时插入两个独立的充电枪。这对于比亚迪来说并不是什么新鲜事，他们的腾势D9和N7已经支持这项技术，并引发了一些关于充电站占用的争议。
Like its older brother, the U8, the U9 can also do a tank turn. It doesn’t have lidar, but thanks to its DiPilot ADAS (advanced driver-assistance system), it features an autonomous parking assistant. U9’s lightweight body coefficient reaches 0.95. As for the torsional rigidity, it is 54,425 Nm. The rear spoiler of the U9 provides a downforce of up to 280 kg. The U9 drives on 21″ Pirelli P-Zero tires.
与它的哥哥 U8 一样，U9 也可以进行坦克转弯。它没有激光雷达，但由于其 DiPilot ADAS（高级驾驶员辅助系统），它具有自动停车助手。 U9的轻量化车身系数达到0.95。至于扭转刚度，则为54,425 Nm。 U9的后扰流板可提供高达280公斤的下压力。 U9 使用 21 英寸倍耐力 P-Zero 轮胎。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
与它的哥哥 U8 一样，U9 也可以进行坦克转弯。它没有激光雷达，但由于其 DiPilot ADAS（高级驾驶员辅助系统），它具有自动停车助手。 U9的轻量化车身系数达到0.95。至于扭转刚度，则为54,425 Nm。 U9的后扰流板可提供高达280公斤的下压力。 U9 使用 21 英寸倍耐力 P-Zero 轮胎。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The interior is quite dull, especially compared with the striking interior, where almost too much is happening in front and rear. Three LCD screens have thick bezels and look like something from the 2010s. Two are identical, measuring 10.25 inches: one is positioned in front of the driver, and the other in front of the passenger. The bigger vertical screen is 12.3″ and positioned in the middle as the central control screen. The three-spoke steering wheel is quite large, as the supercar should be, and features many physical buttons.
车内设计相当沉闷，特别是与引人注目的前后座内饰相比，几乎在前后座发生了太多的变化。三块液晶屏幕的边框较厚，看起来有些像2010年代的产物。其中两块屏幕尺寸相同，均为10.25英寸：一块位于驾驶员面前，另一块位于乘客面前。更大的垂直屏幕为12.3英寸，位于中央作为中央控制屏。三辐方向盘相当大，正如超级跑车应该有的样子，并配备了许多物理按键。
车内设计相当沉闷，特别是与引人注目的前后座内饰相比，几乎在前后座发生了太多的变化。三块液晶屏幕的边框较厚，看起来有些像2010年代的产物。其中两块屏幕尺寸相同，均为10.25英寸：一块位于驾驶员面前，另一块位于乘客面前。更大的垂直屏幕为12.3英寸，位于中央作为中央控制屏。三辐方向盘相当大，正如超级跑车应该有的样子，并配备了许多物理按键。
The cockpit system is called Dilix and is powered by a 5G and 4nm chip co-developed by BYD and Qualcomm.
该座舱系统名为Dilix，搭载比亚迪和高通共同开发的5G和4nm芯片。
该座舱系统名为Dilix，搭载比亚迪和高通共同开发的5G和4nm芯片。
YangWang is BYD’s high end brand. U9 is its second car after the hard-core, floating-on-water SUV U8, which started deliveries in December last year. The third model – the YangWang U7 sedan, with a 135.5 kWh battery – will follow soon. Based on CarNewsChina information, the fourth car will be a fastback SUV.
仰望是比亚迪旗下的高端品牌。 U9是继去年12月开始交付的硬派水上SUV U8之后的第二款汽车。第三款车型——配备 135.5 kWh 电池的仰望 U7 轿车——即将推出。据CarNewsChina信息显示，第四款车将是一款溜背SUV。
仰望是比亚迪旗下的高端品牌。 U9是继去年12月开始交付的硬派水上SUV U8之后的第二款汽车。第三款车型——配备 135.5 kWh 电池的仰望 U7 轿车——即将推出。据CarNewsChina信息显示，第四款车将是一款溜背SUV。
There was no word on when the deliveries would start, but CarNewsChina expects it will be in mid-2024. Pre-orders started today, and customers who want to purchase U9 must pay a non-refundable 300,000 yuan deposit. BYD will offer a warranty for 6 years or 150,000 km.
目前还没有关于何时开始交付的消息，但 CarNewsChina 预计将在 2024 年中期。今天开始预购，想要购买U9的顾客必须支付不可退还的30万元定金。比亚迪将提供6年或15万公里的质保。
目前还没有关于何时开始交付的消息，但 CarNewsChina 预计将在 2024 年中期。今天开始预购，想要购买U9的顾客必须支付不可退还的30万元定金。比亚迪将提供6年或15万公里的质保。
YangWang U9 will compete with Geely’s Lotus Emeya sedan and GAC Aion’s Hyper SSR with 1224 horsepower. It also eyes Chinese owners of Ferrari or Lamborghini.
仰望U9将与吉利的莲花Emeya轿车和广汽Aion的1224马力Hyper（昊铂）SSR竞争。它还瞄准了中国法拉利或兰博基尼车主的市场。
仰望U9将与吉利的莲花Emeya轿车和广汽Aion的1224马力Hyper（昊铂）SSR竞争。它还瞄准了中国法拉利或兰博基尼车主的市场。
评论翻译
Caysman2005Caysman2005Caysman2005Caysman2005Caysman2005level 2
Caysman2005.
Price war's hittin hard
价格战来势汹汹。
Caysman2005.
Price war's hittin hard
价格战来势汹汹。
Jimmy-Pesto-Jr
they're not just going after ford
they're also going after ferrari
他们不仅追赶福特，还将目标对准法拉利。
they're not just going after ford
they're also going after ferrari
他们不仅追赶福特，还将目标对准法拉利。
Langsamkoenig
What is really interesting about this is that there are now LFP batteries in high end sports cars. That's crazy progress.
真正有趣的是，现在已经有了使用磷酸铁锂电池的高端跑车。这是疯狂的进步。
What is really interesting about this is that there are now LFP batteries in high end sports cars. That's crazy progress.
真正有趣的是，现在已经有了使用磷酸铁锂电池的高端跑车。这是疯狂的进步。
skididapapa
Crazy how BYD achieved these impressive specs with LFP batteries, Destroying the myth that LFP is for mass market.
比亚迪如何利用磷酸铁锂电池实现这些令人印象深刻的规格，这打破了磷酸铁锂仅适用于大众市场的神话，这真是太疯狂了。
Crazy how BYD achieved these impressive specs with LFP batteries, Destroying the myth that LFP is for mass market.
比亚迪如何利用磷酸铁锂电池实现这些令人印象深刻的规格，这打破了磷酸铁锂仅适用于大众市场的神话，这真是太疯狂了。
74orangebeetle
Just because something can perform well doesn't mean it's not also for mass market. It can be for both.
仅仅因为某些东西表现良好并不意味着它不适合大众市场。它可以同时适用于两者。
Just because something can perform well doesn't mean it's not also for mass market. It can be for both.
仅仅因为某些东西表现良好并不意味着它不适合大众市场。它可以同时适用于两者。
skididapapa
I think you have miss interpreted my comment, LFP is seen as cheaper, inferior tech, Less energy dense compared to NMC batteries...(Not anymore)
我认为你误解了我的评论，之前人们认为磷酸铁锂电池（LFP）更便宜、技术较差、比NMC（三元锂）电池能量密度低...（现在不再是这样了）。
I think you have miss interpreted my comment, LFP is seen as cheaper, inferior tech, Less energy dense compared to NMC batteries...(Not anymore)
我认为你误解了我的评论，之前人们认为磷酸铁锂电池（LFP）更便宜、技术较差、比NMC（三元锂）电池能量密度低...（现在不再是这样了）。
Tyr1326
I mean. It probably still is less energy dense, theyre just showing that the density isnt as important.
我的理解是，它可能仍然比较低能量密度，只是他们表明密度并不是那么重要。
I mean. It probably still is less energy dense, theyre just showing that the density isnt as important.
我的理解是，它可能仍然比较低能量密度，只是他们表明密度并不是那么重要。
1731799517
But notably its not really less power dense, i remember building battery packs out of A123 32650 cells like 15 years ago and even back then you could pull 15C out of them.
Like, the original Killacycle used LFP cells.
但值得注意的是，实际上它并不是功率密度更低。我记得大约15年前使用A123 32650电池组装电池包，即使在那时，它们也能提供15C的放电率。比如，最初的 Killacycle（一款电动摩托车）就使用了磷酸铁锂电池。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
But notably its not really less power dense, i remember building battery packs out of A123 32650 cells like 15 years ago and even back then you could pull 15C out of them.
Like, the original Killacycle used LFP cells.
但值得注意的是，实际上它并不是功率密度更低。我记得大约15年前使用A123 32650电池组装电池包，即使在那时，它们也能提供15C的放电率。比如，最初的 Killacycle（一款电动摩托车）就使用了磷酸铁锂电池。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
SatanLifeProTips
Slightly lower density ain't a bad tradeoff for 2-3x as many cycles and a calendar life of around 20 years instead of NMC's 15. LFP is the under dog to watch. Plus you can charge to 100% so it doesn't affect your day to day range as much. There is a reason LFP is so popular in China.
稍微降低密度并不是一个坏的权衡选择，略低的能量密度对于能够获得2-3倍的循环寿命以及大约20年的日历寿命，而不是三元锂电池的15年。磷酸铁锂电池（LFP）是一个值得关注的黑马。此外，你可以充电至100%，因此它对日常续航里程的影响并不那么大。磷酸铁锂电池在中国如此受欢迎是有原因的。（注：三元锂电池不推荐满充满放）
Slightly lower density ain't a bad tradeoff for 2-3x as many cycles and a calendar life of around 20 years instead of NMC's 15. LFP is the under dog to watch. Plus you can charge to 100% so it doesn't affect your day to day range as much. There is a reason LFP is so popular in China.
稍微降低密度并不是一个坏的权衡选择，略低的能量密度对于能够获得2-3倍的循环寿命以及大约20年的日历寿命，而不是三元锂电池的15年。磷酸铁锂电池（LFP）是一个值得关注的黑马。此外，你可以充电至100%，因此它对日常续航里程的影响并不那么大。磷酸铁锂电池在中国如此受欢迎是有原因的。（注：三元锂电池不推荐满充满放）
Langsamkoenig
LFP is already becoming mainstream (of course the west is like 5 years behind, as always in this space). The underog to watch is sodium-ion.
磷酸铁锂电池已经成为主流（当然，西方在这个领域总是落后大约5年。）。值得关注的黑马是钠离子电池。
LFP is already becoming mainstream (of course the west is like 5 years behind, as always in this space). The underog to watch is sodium-ion.
磷酸铁锂电池已经成为主流（当然，西方在这个领域总是落后大约5年。）。值得关注的黑马是钠离子电池。
the_lamou
You don't need great battery tech to go very fast. That's the absolute easiest thing to do in an EV. You could, without very much difficulty, do it with battery tech from ten or twenty years ago, provided you had decent motors, which are also not terribly difficult to build and largely a solved problem. So the fact that this car gets to 60 relatively quickly is just not that impressive, and that it does so with LFP batteries isn't remotely interesting. Especially at a price tag of $236k.
That it gets under 200 miles of range also isn't terribly surprising, but does definitely point to why people say LFP is for mass market. It's got significantly less range than other cars which are just as fast and cost less. All while weighing 300lbs more. There's just absolutely nothing remotely impressive about this car, other than the fact that for some reason, someone decided to stick a stupidly heavy, small battery pack into something that they hoped would impress supercar buyers. That level of poor decision-making actually is incredibly impressive.
确实，要实现高速行驶并不需要先进的电池技术。在电动汽车中，（电池）是绝对最容易实现的事情之一。你可以轻松地使用十年或二十年前的电池技术，只要你有像样的电机，而且电池制造起来也不是特别困难，这基本上已经是一个解决了的问题。因此，这辆车相对较快地达到60英里的速度并不那么令人印象深刻，而且它使用磷酸铁锂电池来实现这一点也没有什么特别的地方，尤其是考虑到它的售价高达23.6万美元。
事实上，它的续航里程不到200英里并不特别令人惊讶，但确实说明了为什么人们说磷酸铁锂电池是为大众市场而设计的。它的续航里程明显比其他同样快且价格更低的汽车少得多，而且重量还增加了300磅。这辆车实际上没有任何令人印象深刻的地方，除了有人不知为何决定在一辆希望能打动超级跑车买家的汽车上安装一个非常重、容量较小的电池组。这种程度的糟糕决策实际上相当令人印象深刻。
You don't need great battery tech to go very fast. That's the absolute easiest thing to do in an EV. You could, without very much difficulty, do it with battery tech from ten or twenty years ago, provided you had decent motors, which are also not terribly difficult to build and largely a solved problem. So the fact that this car gets to 60 relatively quickly is just not that impressive, and that it does so with LFP batteries isn't remotely interesting. Especially at a price tag of $236k.
That it gets under 200 miles of range also isn't terribly surprising, but does definitely point to why people say LFP is for mass market. It's got significantly less range than other cars which are just as fast and cost less. All while weighing 300lbs more. There's just absolutely nothing remotely impressive about this car, other than the fact that for some reason, someone decided to stick a stupidly heavy, small battery pack into something that they hoped would impress supercar buyers. That level of poor decision-making actually is incredibly impressive.
确实，要实现高速行驶并不需要先进的电池技术。在电动汽车中，（电池）是绝对最容易实现的事情之一。你可以轻松地使用十年或二十年前的电池技术，只要你有像样的电机，而且电池制造起来也不是特别困难，这基本上已经是一个解决了的问题。因此，这辆车相对较快地达到60英里的速度并不那么令人印象深刻，而且它使用磷酸铁锂电池来实现这一点也没有什么特别的地方，尤其是考虑到它的售价高达23.6万美元。
事实上，它的续航里程不到200英里并不特别令人惊讶，但确实说明了为什么人们说磷酸铁锂电池是为大众市场而设计的。它的续航里程明显比其他同样快且价格更低的汽车少得多，而且重量还增加了300磅。这辆车实际上没有任何令人印象深刻的地方，除了有人不知为何决定在一辆希望能打动超级跑车买家的汽车上安装一个非常重、容量较小的电池组。这种程度的糟糕决策实际上相当令人印象深刻。
Comfortable_Stop5535
They just released the lap times for the Shanghai International Circuit... a disappointing 2:17.65.
For reference, the Audi RS Q8 (an SUV) did 2:19.88, only two seconds slower. The Zeekr 001 FR was 5 seconds faster than the Audi on the Zhejiang Circuit, and the Lotus Emeya was 7 seconds faster.BYD's 1.68 million "hypercar" can't even beat other Chinese sedans in lap times...
他们刚刚公布了上海国际赛车场的单圈成绩……令人失望的 2 分 17.65 秒。作为参考，奥迪 RS Q8（一款 SUV）的成绩为 2:19.88，仅慢了两秒。在浙江赛道上，Zeekr 001 FR比奥迪快了5秒，莲花Emeya则快了7秒。比亚迪168万辆“超级跑车”单圈成绩连其他中国轿车都打不过……
They just released the lap times for the Shanghai International Circuit... a disappointing 2:17.65.
For reference, the Audi RS Q8 (an SUV) did 2:19.88, only two seconds slower. The Zeekr 001 FR was 5 seconds faster than the Audi on the Zhejiang Circuit, and the Lotus Emeya was 7 seconds faster.BYD's 1.68 million "hypercar" can't even beat other Chinese sedans in lap times...
他们刚刚公布了上海国际赛车场的单圈成绩……令人失望的 2 分 17.65 秒。作为参考，奥迪 RS Q8（一款 SUV）的成绩为 2:19.88，仅慢了两秒。在浙江赛道上，Zeekr 001 FR比奥迪快了5秒，莲花Emeya则快了7秒。比亚迪168万辆“超级跑车”单圈成绩连其他中国轿车都打不过……
kimi_rules
I've been saying this numerous times, the Chinese brands DO NOT have any real experience in racing, which legacy auto took almost a century to perfect it.You can see here brands under Geely(Zeekr & Lotus) seems to have good laptimes with significantly less power. Lotus and Polestar did well sharing their race experience with the parent company, which helped Geely build better cars across all its lineup.
我已经多次强调过，中国品牌在赛车方面没有任何真正的经验，而传统汽车制造商几乎花了一个世纪的时间来完善这一领域。
你可以在这里看到吉利旗下的品牌（极氪和路特斯）似乎拥有不错的圈速，但动力明显较低。 路特斯和Polestar（极星）很好地与母公司分享了他们的比赛经验，这帮助吉利在其所有产品线中打造了更好的汽车。
I've been saying this numerous times, the Chinese brands DO NOT have any real experience in racing, which legacy auto took almost a century to perfect it.You can see here brands under Geely(Zeekr & Lotus) seems to have good laptimes with significantly less power. Lotus and Polestar did well sharing their race experience with the parent company, which helped Geely build better cars across all its lineup.
我已经多次强调过，中国品牌在赛车方面没有任何真正的经验，而传统汽车制造商几乎花了一个世纪的时间来完善这一领域。
你可以在这里看到吉利旗下的品牌（极氪和路特斯）似乎拥有不错的圈速，但动力明显较低。 路特斯和Polestar（极星）很好地与母公司分享了他们的比赛经验，这帮助吉利在其所有产品线中打造了更好的汽车。
Racer20 Anyone can make a good looking car that goes fast. Making it actually drive, handle, and ride well is really hard. It takes generations of cars to get to that point. Hyundai Kia are just now getting there with their mainstream cars but their performance cars are still just overly aggressive and have poor ride trade-offs. The Chinese will get there faster than the Koreans, but we’re still 1-3 generations away from Chinese cars that actually drive as well as the best US and EU cars.
任何人都可以制造一辆外观漂亮且快速的汽车。但要真正使其驾驶、操控和乘坐得当则非常困难。需要经过几代汽车的积累才能达到这一点。现代和起亚现在才在其主流车型上达到这一水平，但它们的性能车型仍然过于激进，且在悬挂舒适性上存在不足。中国可能会比韩国更快地取得进展，但我们距离中国汽车真正能够与美国和欧盟最好的汽车相媲美还需要1-3代的时间。
任何人都可以制造一辆外观漂亮且快速的汽车。但要真正使其驾驶、操控和乘坐得当则非常困难。需要经过几代汽车的积累才能达到这一点。现代和起亚现在才在其主流车型上达到这一水平，但它们的性能车型仍然过于激进，且在悬挂舒适性上存在不足。中国可能会比韩国更快地取得进展，但我们距离中国汽车真正能够与美国和欧盟最好的汽车相媲美还需要1-3代的时间。
someotherguytyping
I offer GM as a sacrifice if we can plz plz plz just import BYD - just BYD please common gov plz give us the good EV’s.
如果我们可以的话，我愿意将通用汽车作为牺牲品，请进口比亚迪 - 请进口比亚迪，请政府给我们好的电动汽车。
I offer GM as a sacrifice if we can plz plz plz just import BYD - just BYD please common gov plz give us the good EV’s.
如果我们可以的话，我愿意将通用汽车作为牺牲品，请进口比亚迪 - 请进口比亚迪，请政府给我们好的电动汽车。
stav_and_nick
Nah, I like GM, offer Chrysler or Ram as a sacrifice, I’ve never met a Ram owner worth a shit 不，我喜欢通用汽车（GM），献祭克莱斯勒或Ram（道奇）吧，我从未见过比狗屎更好的Ram车主。
Nah, I like GM, offer Chrysler or Ram as a sacrifice, I’ve never met a Ram owner worth a shit 不，我喜欢通用汽车（GM），献祭克莱斯勒或Ram（道奇）吧，我从未见过比狗屎更好的Ram车主。
voheke9860
As an American, I want our own automobile companies to do well. However, at the same time, cheaper EVs means more EVs/less ICE cars, which is reduces the amount of pollution that is good for our health.I would rather choose to protect the health of Americans, than protect the profits of American automakers. But I wonder if our politicians feel the same way.
作为美国人，我希望我们自己的汽车公司表现出色。然而，与此同时，更便宜的电动汽车意味着更多的电动汽车和更少的内燃机汽车，这减少了污染量，对我们的健康有益。我宁愿选择保护美国人的健康，而不是保护美国汽车制造商的利润。但我想知道我们的政治家是否也有同样的感觉。
As an American, I want our own automobile companies to do well. However, at the same time, cheaper EVs means more EVs/less ICE cars, which is reduces the amount of pollution that is good for our health.I would rather choose to protect the health of Americans, than protect the profits of American automakers. But I wonder if our politicians feel the same way.
作为美国人，我希望我们自己的汽车公司表现出色。然而，与此同时，更便宜的电动汽车意味着更多的电动汽车和更少的内燃机汽车，这减少了污染量，对我们的健康有益。我宁愿选择保护美国人的健康，而不是保护美国汽车制造商的利润。但我想知道我们的政治家是否也有同样的感觉。
tooltalk01
Absolutely. We should let them in, but it should be conditioned on a joint venture with a local competitor, either GM or Ford, which would allow sharing of BYD's profit and IP transfer.
好主意。我们应该允许他们（BYD）进入市场，但条件是与当地的竞争对手建立合资企业，可以共享比亚迪的利润并进行知识产权转让，可以选择与通用汽车或福特等企业进行合作。
Absolutely. We should let them in, but it should be conditioned on a joint venture with a local competitor, either GM or Ford, which would allow sharing of BYD's profit and IP transfer.
好主意。我们应该允许他们（BYD）进入市场，但条件是与当地的竞争对手建立合资企业，可以共享比亚迪的利润并进行知识产权转让，可以选择与通用汽车或福特等企业进行合作。
很赞 15
收藏