中国的超级工程令人震撼! （最新评论）
正文翻译
视频简介：
视频通过高空俯拍的角度，纪录了中国修建铺设高架桥，展现了中国高超基础建设的能力，赢得了一众网友的喝彩。不过酸葡萄也很多，读者需注意甄别。（后续评论，跟以前的译文有部分重复，一部分读者可能看过。）
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：翻译熊 转载请注明出处
视频简介：
视频通过高空俯拍的角度，纪录了中国修建铺设高架桥，展现了中国高超基础建设的能力，赢得了一众网友的喝彩。不过酸葡萄也很多，读者需注意甄别。（后续评论，跟以前的译文有部分重复，一部分读者可能看过。）
评论翻译
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：翻译熊 转载请注明出处
Joe zhifu5
China has 70% Engineers in the Government and America has 70% Lawyers.
中国7成人都是工程师，美国政府7成人是律师。
China has 70% Engineers in the Government and America has 70% Lawyers.
中国7成人都是工程师，美国政府7成人是律师。
Filip Andersson5
China may have more engineers, but they are not any better than those in other countries, the thing is that china puts a huge amount of money into their road networks, other counties spends their money on something they think is more important. There is a reason why the people of china is poor.
中国可能有更多的工程师，但他们并不比其他国家的好，问题是中国在他们的道路网络上投入了大量的资金，其他国家把钱花在他们认为更重要的事情上。中国人民贫穷是有原因的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
China may have more engineers, but they are not any better than those in other countries, the thing is that china puts a huge amount of money into their road networks, other counties spends their money on something they think is more important. There is a reason why the people of china is poor.
中国可能有更多的工程师，但他们并不比其他国家的好，问题是中国在他们的道路网络上投入了大量的资金，其他国家把钱花在他们认为更重要的事情上。中国人民贫穷是有原因的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
SovaNova955
@Filip Andersson Omg, are u saying that roads are not important? You do know that buissnises can''''t exist without road, rail and other infrastructure, the bigger capacity and speed of this traffic nets the better for buissnises, all buissnises. That is why China have world''''s most powerful economy, and Chinese people are not really poor as u may think, China has zero homeless people living on the streets, while US has over 2 milion people with out home, 6 milion people are jobless, and 40 milion people live out of food stamps and generally out of welfare because they are not self-sufficien, when people say America is a rich country they do not get that only about 1% of Americans are like super rich, and everybody else is like working is ass out just to pay bills or is living on welfare.
天啊，你是在说道路不重要吗?你知道，如果没有公路、铁路和其他基础设施，高容量高速的交通网络的话，商业将举步维艰。
这就是为什么中国拥有世界上最强大的经济，中国人并不像你想的那么穷，中国没有无家可归的人露宿街头，然而美国有超过200万人无家可归，600万人没有工作，4000万人依靠食品券和福利生活，因为他们不能自给自足。
当人们说美国是一个富裕的国家时，他们并没有意识到只有1%的美国人是超级富豪，而其他人都在拼命工作只是为了支付账单或靠福利生活。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Filip Andersson Omg, are u saying that roads are not important? You do know that buissnises can''''t exist without road, rail and other infrastructure, the bigger capacity and speed of this traffic nets the better for buissnises, all buissnises. That is why China have world''''s most powerful economy, and Chinese people are not really poor as u may think, China has zero homeless people living on the streets, while US has over 2 milion people with out home, 6 milion people are jobless, and 40 milion people live out of food stamps and generally out of welfare because they are not self-sufficien, when people say America is a rich country they do not get that only about 1% of Americans are like super rich, and everybody else is like working is ass out just to pay bills or is living on welfare.
天啊，你是在说道路不重要吗?你知道，如果没有公路、铁路和其他基础设施，高容量高速的交通网络的话，商业将举步维艰。
这就是为什么中国拥有世界上最强大的经济，中国人并不像你想的那么穷，中国没有无家可归的人露宿街头，然而美国有超过200万人无家可归，600万人没有工作，4000万人依靠食品券和福利生活，因为他们不能自给自足。
当人们说美国是一个富裕的国家时，他们并没有意识到只有1%的美国人是超级富豪，而其他人都在拼命工作只是为了支付账单或靠福利生活。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Nan Li5
Filip Andersson i think you come from somewhere with no road exist. Like Space.
我想你来自一个没有路的地方，比如外太空。
Filip Andersson i think you come from somewhere with no road exist. Like Space.
我想你来自一个没有路的地方，比如外太空。
Filip Andersson5
@SovaNova95 Where did i say that roads are not important lol? China has one of the biggest economies, but that doesnt mean that the people are rich. China should focus more on its own poor people then spending countless of bilions on roads which the majority wont ever drive on. We build roads where i live too, but we know when not to build and when to, so we could focus more on the peoples wellbeing, my country has flaws too but at least we have democratic electaions and freedom of speach, china doesnt.
我在哪里说过道路不重要，哈哈?中国是世界上最大的经济体之一，但这并不意味着人民富裕。中国应该更多地关注自己的穷人，而不是花无数的钱在大多数人都不会开的路上。
我们也在我住的地方修路，但我们知道什么时候不修路，什么时候修路，所以我们可以更关注人民的福祉，我的国家也有缺陷，但至少我们有民主选举，中国没有。
@SovaNova95 Where did i say that roads are not important lol? China has one of the biggest economies, but that doesnt mean that the people are rich. China should focus more on its own poor people then spending countless of bilions on roads which the majority wont ever drive on. We build roads where i live too, but we know when not to build and when to, so we could focus more on the peoples wellbeing, my country has flaws too but at least we have democratic electaions and freedom of speach, china doesnt.
我在哪里说过道路不重要，哈哈?中国是世界上最大的经济体之一，但这并不意味着人民富裕。中国应该更多地关注自己的穷人，而不是花无数的钱在大多数人都不会开的路上。
我们也在我住的地方修路，但我们知道什么时候不修路，什么时候修路，所以我们可以更关注人民的福祉，我的国家也有缺陷，但至少我们有民主选举，中国没有。
SovaNova955
@Filip Andersson Roads are for people''''s wellbeing, and China is not building only roads, and btw chinese are not poor, average salary in China 2019 is 1300 US dollars
道路是为了人民的福祉，中国不是只修路，顺便说一句，中国人并不穷，2019年中国的平均工资是1300美元
@Filip Andersson Roads are for people''''s wellbeing, and China is not building only roads, and btw chinese are not poor, average salary in China 2019 is 1300 US dollars
道路是为了人民的福祉，中国不是只修路，顺便说一句，中国人并不穷，2019年中国的平均工资是1300美元
Filip Andersson5
@SovaNova95 1300 is low
1300不高。
@SovaNova95 1300 is low
1300不高。
SovaNova955
@Filip Andersson Not for most of the world, and avarage of 1300 in 1.3 bilion people is more than grate, compare it with India which has 1.2 bilion population with average salary of about 200 US dollars. In my country average is below 600$, but of course cost of living here is lower than in Sweden, so it is not as bad as u may think, but it is pretty bad anyway
但对世界上大多数地方而言算可以的，1.3亿人口，1300美元的月薪平均收入比印度多,印度有1.2亿人口，平均工资约200美元。
在我的国家，人均收入不到600美元，但这里的生活成本当然比瑞典低，所以并不像你想的那么糟糕，但无论如何也很糟糕
@Filip Andersson Not for most of the world, and avarage of 1300 in 1.3 bilion people is more than grate, compare it with India which has 1.2 bilion population with average salary of about 200 US dollars. In my country average is below 600$, but of course cost of living here is lower than in Sweden, so it is not as bad as u may think, but it is pretty bad anyway
但对世界上大多数地方而言算可以的，1.3亿人口，1300美元的月薪平均收入比印度多,印度有1.2亿人口，平均工资约200美元。
在我的国家，人均收入不到600美元，但这里的生活成本当然比瑞典低，所以并不像你想的那么糟糕，但无论如何也很糟糕
Mauro Morganti5
@Filip Andersson How told you that, you still believe the media? thack a trip to China only then make a comment on freedom and democracy
为何你还要相信媒体？去中国旅旅游，之后再来评论什么是自由和民主。
@Filip Andersson How told you that, you still believe the media? thack a trip to China only then make a comment on freedom and democracy
为何你还要相信媒体？去中国旅旅游，之后再来评论什么是自由和民主。
Filip Andersson5
Mauro Morganti Been to China, its a wonderful place for tourists but not for the people who lives there.
到过中国，对游客来说是个好地方，但对生活在那里的人来说却不是。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Mauro Morganti Been to China, its a wonderful place for tourists but not for the people who lives there.
到过中国，对游客来说是个好地方，但对生活在那里的人来说却不是。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Mauro Morganti5
@Filip Andersson again go and see personally not throw media
再说一遍，独自去中国走走，不要通过媒体。
@Filip Andersson again go and see personally not throw media
再说一遍，独自去中国走走，不要通过媒体。
Filip Andersson5
Mauro Morganti I told you I’ve been there, i have already seen China with my own eyes.
我告诉过你我去过了，我已经亲眼看到了中国。
Mauro Morganti I told you I’ve been there, i have already seen China with my own eyes.
我告诉过你我去过了，我已经亲眼看到了中国。
Mauro Morganti5
@Filip Andersson, then you must be blind or brainwashed, I have never fill fear or bee arise from people in China, all ways do what I wanted to do and definitely not one ask for a donation unless the handicap
那你一定是瞎了眼或被洗脑了，我从来没有因为当地人的原因感到恐惧，我可以做我所想，任何方式，绝对没有人要求捐赠，除非（语言）障碍。
Kok Foong Soo5 （修改过）
@Filip Andersson, then you must be blind or brainwashed, I have never fill fear or bee arise from people in China, all ways do what I wanted to do and definitely not one ask for a donation unless the handicap
那你一定是瞎了眼或被洗脑了，我从来没有因为当地人的原因感到恐惧，我可以做我所想，任何方式，绝对没有人要求捐赠，除非（语言）障碍。
Kok Foong Soo5 （修改过）
Some people think others are brainwashed when they refuse to learn and accept the reality. In every country, you will find losers, some poorer than others etc But i believe China is moving in a correct direction and future. It is lifting out many of the citizen from poverty with many other programme. Be obxtive, dont be overly bias. Good for our mind and health
有些人认为当别人拒绝学习和接受现实时，他们就被洗脑了。在每个国家，你都会发现loser，一些国家比其他国家更穷，但我相信中国正朝着正确的方向和未来前进。
它正在通过许多其它项目使许多公民摆脱贫困。要客观，不要过分偏颇。对我们的精神和健康有好处.
有些人认为当别人拒绝学习和接受现实时，他们就被洗脑了。在每个国家，你都会发现loser，一些国家比其他国家更穷，但我相信中国正朝着正确的方向和未来前进。
它正在通过许多其它项目使许多公民摆脱贫困。要客观，不要过分偏颇。对我们的精神和健康有好处.
Mark Shao5
SovaNova95 it''''s not 1300 dollars. It''''s 9000 dollars.
不是1300美元。是9000美元的（年）平均工资。
SovaNova95 it''''s not 1300 dollars. It''''s 9000 dollars.
不是1300美元。是9000美元的（年）平均工资。
Ken Chan5
@Filip Andersson china government build infrastructures for her citizens, US make more bombs to bomb other countries.
中国为她的公民建造基础设施，而美国制造更多的炸弹来轰炸其他国家。
@Filip Andersson china government build infrastructures for her citizens, US make more bombs to bomb other countries.
中国为她的公民建造基础设施，而美国制造更多的炸弹来轰炸其他国家。
Ken Chan5
@Filip Andersson I indee once a poor chinese guy, but i am now more money than you thought. Poor guy.
我以前穷，但现在我比你想的还要有钱。你个可怜的家伙
@Filip Andersson I indee once a poor chinese guy, but i am now more money than you thought. Poor guy.
我以前穷，但现在我比你想的还要有钱。你个可怜的家伙
Ken Chan5
@Filip Andersson you are blindly imagine what China now. Do your study china before put out a judgement.
你盲目地想象中国现在是什么样子。在作出判断之前，先研究一下中国。
@Filip Andersson you are blindly imagine what China now. Do your study china before put out a judgement.
你盲目地想象中国现在是什么样子。在作出判断之前，先研究一下中国。
Filip Andersson5
@Ken Chan Im not sure what you are trying to say, you clearly cant read so the discussion ends here.
我不确定你想说什么，你显然看不懂，所以讨论到此结束。
@Ken Chan Im not sure what you are trying to say, you clearly cant read so the discussion ends here.
我不确定你想说什么，你显然看不懂，所以讨论到此结束。
Xiao Han5
@Filip Andersson ?? funny moron
这样说有意思吗？傻子
@Filip Andersson ?? funny moron
这样说有意思吗？傻子
Z Wang5
Filip Andersson hahah， tbh, your comment made me laugh . Cannot believe there are dumbs like you out there
Filip Andersson 哈哈，哈哈，你的评论让我笑了。真不敢相信有像你这样的笨蛋
Filip Andersson hahah， tbh, your comment made me laugh . Cannot believe there are dumbs like you out there
Filip Andersson 哈哈，哈哈，你的评论让我笑了。真不敢相信有像你这样的笨蛋
ca2ca5
@Jinbin Lv Excellent. This is how West and East works. I expected an answer from Filip Andersonto this.
太好了。这就是西方和东方的运作方式。我期待Filip Anderson会回答这个问题。
@Jinbin Lv Excellent. This is how West and East works. I expected an answer from Filip Andersonto this.
太好了。这就是西方和东方的运作方式。我期待Filip Anderson会回答这个问题。
KVZ5
America has 70% of liars.
美国不是有7成人是律师，是有7成人是骗子。
America has 70% of liars.
美国不是有7成人是律师，是有7成人是骗子。
JakeCabs5
@Filip Andersson as long citizens are comfortable on the it''''s governance & making progress then its not an issue. By the way in regards with HK you just confirmed it then its rightful to be with China, Britain is just using it as well expanding & safeguard their maritime trade route controls. It would be too stupid conquering nations w/o your self greed as driving force.
只要公民对自己的治理和进步感到放心，那么这就不是问题。
顺便说一下，，你刚刚确认了它理应与中国在一起，英国只是利用它扩大和保护他们的海上贸易路线控制。以自己的贪婪为驱动力去征服国家是愚蠢的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Filip Andersson as long citizens are comfortable on the it''''s governance & making progress then its not an issue. By the way in regards with HK you just confirmed it then its rightful to be with China, Britain is just using it as well expanding & safeguard their maritime trade route controls. It would be too stupid conquering nations w/o your self greed as driving force.
只要公民对自己的治理和进步感到放心，那么这就不是问题。
顺便说一下，，你刚刚确认了它理应与中国在一起，英国只是利用它扩大和保护他们的海上贸易路线控制。以自己的贪婪为驱动力去征服国家是愚蠢的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
JakeCabs5
@Filip Andersson im filipino here & happy for chinas innovation & success, dictatorship? then for me & you who grows on a country w/ democracy makes me wonder on your confidence with governance; are you sure its your choosen politician who runs the government or the corporate? Access most/everything on net? Maybe their is the true brainwashing happened by deception.
我是菲律宾人，为中国的创新和成功而高兴。
那么对于我和你们这些在民主国家成长的人来说，我想知道你们对治理的信心。
你确定是你选择的政客在经营政府吗?访问大部分/所有网络再看看?也许他们才是真正被洗脑了。
abraham rubio jr5 （修改过）
@Filip Andersson im filipino here & happy for chinas innovation & success, dictatorship? then for me & you who grows on a country w/ democracy makes me wonder on your confidence with governance; are you sure its your choosen politician who runs the government or the corporate? Access most/everything on net? Maybe their is the true brainwashing happened by deception.
我是菲律宾人，为中国的创新和成功而高兴。
那么对于我和你们这些在民主国家成长的人来说，我想知道你们对治理的信心。
你确定是你选择的政客在经营政府吗?访问大部分/所有网络再看看?也许他们才是真正被洗脑了。
abraham rubio jr5 （修改过）
@Filip Andersson That is the most idiotic statement I''''ve ever heard in my fucking life.. yeah China put their money into infrastructure Healthcare System schooling transportation such as bullet trains subway system best highways in the world while the West spend 50% of their GDP on making bombs and war machines.. 30% of u.s. population is on Welfare so get your stupid facts straight before making an absurd statement, this is blasphemy!!
这是我这辈子听过的最愚蠢的话…是的，中国把钱投在基础设施、医疗系统、学校、运输系统，如子弹头列车、地铁系统、世界上最好的高速公路，而西方把50%的GDP花在制造炸弹和战争机器上。
30%的美国人靠福利生活，所以在发表荒谬的言论之前，把你愚蠢的事实弄清楚，这是亵渎!!
这是我这辈子听过的最愚蠢的话…是的，中国把钱投在基础设施、医疗系统、学校、运输系统，如子弹头列车、地铁系统、世界上最好的高速公路，而西方把50%的GDP花在制造炸弹和战争机器上。
30%的美国人靠福利生活，所以在发表荒谬的言论之前，把你愚蠢的事实弄清楚，这是亵渎!!
xu Bruce5
Filip Andersson you are really a stupid man. all things in your mind is “democracy”It''''s are toxic for many countries. In your word Chinese is poor and Chinese will lose their freedom. Your perspective all based on your own thinking with no statistics. the reason we blocked YouTube and Facebook is a solution to protect us from West media. You like to send color revolution to the country who couldn''''t make you happy. We don''''t care if West app could be used in China. because we also have the best social communication apps in the world. And we could control the private data in Chinese people instead West guy. By the way do you think West culture could domestic the world? come on. Do use your galss to see the world especially China. We don''''t care who you are.
你真是个愚蠢的人。你脑子里想的都是“民主”，这对很多国家来说都是有害的。在你的世界里，中国人很穷，他们将失去自由。你的观点都是基于你自己的想法，没有依据。
我们封锁YouTube和Facebook的原因是为了保护我们免受西方媒体的攻击。你喜欢把颜色革命送给那些不能让你快乐的国家。我们不关心西方的app能否在中国使用。因为我们也有世界上最好的社交软件。
我们可以...中国人的私人数据，而不是西方人。顺便问一下，你认为西方文化能使世界本土化吗?来吧。用你的眼睛看世界，尤其是中国。我们不在乎你是谁。
Filip Andersson you are really a stupid man. all things in your mind is “democracy”It''''s are toxic for many countries. In your word Chinese is poor and Chinese will lose their freedom. Your perspective all based on your own thinking with no statistics. the reason we blocked YouTube and Facebook is a solution to protect us from West media. You like to send color revolution to the country who couldn''''t make you happy. We don''''t care if West app could be used in China. because we also have the best social communication apps in the world. And we could control the private data in Chinese people instead West guy. By the way do you think West culture could domestic the world? come on. Do use your galss to see the world especially China. We don''''t care who you are.
你真是个愚蠢的人。你脑子里想的都是“民主”，这对很多国家来说都是有害的。在你的世界里，中国人很穷，他们将失去自由。你的观点都是基于你自己的想法，没有依据。
我们封锁YouTube和Facebook的原因是为了保护我们免受西方媒体的攻击。你喜欢把颜色革命送给那些不能让你快乐的国家。我们不关心西方的app能否在中国使用。因为我们也有世界上最好的社交软件。
我们可以...中国人的私人数据，而不是西方人。顺便问一下，你认为西方文化能使世界本土化吗?来吧。用你的眼睛看世界，尤其是中国。我们不在乎你是谁。
nayanmalig5
@Filip Andersson Yea something more important and bitchy - like killing millions of third world peasants, occupying the nations illegally, looting natural resources openly and calling it democracy and being rich LOL that''''s why NATO USA defense budget is 4 times that of China and many wars all over the world - you suckers are poor as shit but do not know it - yet - just wait a while LOL
是的，是一些更重要、更恶毒的事情——比如杀害数百万第三世界农民，非法占领国家，公开掠夺自然资源，称其为民主和富裕，哈哈
这就是为什么北约美国的国防预算是中国的4倍，世界上有很多战争——你们这些笨蛋穷得像狗屎，但还不知道——等等，让我笑一会
Elijah Hua5 （修改过）
@Filip Andersson Yea something more important and bitchy - like killing millions of third world peasants, occupying the nations illegally, looting natural resources openly and calling it democracy and being rich LOL that''''s why NATO USA defense budget is 4 times that of China and many wars all over the world - you suckers are poor as shit but do not know it - yet - just wait a while LOL
是的，是一些更重要、更恶毒的事情——比如杀害数百万第三世界农民，非法占领国家，公开掠夺自然资源，称其为民主和富裕，哈哈
这就是为什么北约美国的国防预算是中国的4倍，世界上有很多战争——你们这些笨蛋穷得像狗屎，但还不知道——等等，让我笑一会
Elijah Hua5 （修改过）
Filip Andersson Chinese people are still poor comparing to the US and Europe. But Chinese government had pulled 800 million people out of poverty in the last 30 years(including my family). And this amazing achievement has done without invading other country robing for oil or other resources nor selling weapons in world wars.
与美国和欧洲相比，中国人仍然很穷。但在过去30年里，中国让8亿人(包括我的家人)脱离了贫困。这一惊人的成就并没有入侵其他国家，没有掠夺石油或其他资源，也没有在世界大战中出售武器。
与美国和欧洲相比，中国人仍然很穷。但在过去30年里，中国让8亿人(包括我的家人)脱离了贫困。这一惊人的成就并没有入侵其他国家，没有掠夺石油或其他资源，也没有在世界大战中出售武器。
LOL LOLOL4
@Filip Andersson very true , when building a road or any infrastructure costs maybe ten times more than in china and takes maybe ten times longer than in china , we can all understand why americans decide these projects are not important. far better spend the same amount waging wars everywhere and keep the military-industrial conglomerates happy than making the ordinary nobody happy.
的确，当修建一条道路或任何基础设施的成本可能是中国的十倍，花费的时间可能是中国的十倍的时候，我们都可以理解为什么美国人认为这些项目不重要。
与其让普通人不高兴，还不如花同样的钱到处打仗，让军工集团高兴。
@Filip Andersson very true , when building a road or any infrastructure costs maybe ten times more than in china and takes maybe ten times longer than in china , we can all understand why americans decide these projects are not important. far better spend the same amount waging wars everywhere and keep the military-industrial conglomerates happy than making the ordinary nobody happy.
的确，当修建一条道路或任何基础设施的成本可能是中国的十倍，花费的时间可能是中国的十倍的时候，我们都可以理解为什么美国人认为这些项目不重要。
与其让普通人不高兴，还不如花同样的钱到处打仗，让军工集团高兴。
Teh Chuan4
70 percent of scammer and liars
（美国政府）7成都是骗子。
70 percent of scammer and liars
（美国政府）7成都是骗子。
Harishankar Mishra4
Joe You people don''''t know the value of freedom. Because you never have experienced freedom. I would rather go hungry than to live in prison like China.
你们这些人不知道自由的价值。因为你从未体验过自由。我宁愿挨饿也不愿像中国那样生活。
Joe You people don''''t know the value of freedom. Because you never have experienced freedom. I would rather go hungry than to live in prison like China.
你们这些人不知道自由的价值。因为你从未体验过自由。我宁愿挨饿也不愿像中国那样生活。
Ken Chan4
@Harishankar Mishra you dont have freedom to eat? Shame on you.
你没有吃东西的自由吗?真可耻。
@Harishankar Mishra you dont have freedom to eat? Shame on you.
你没有吃东西的自由吗?真可耻。
Joe zhifu4
Harishankar Mishra America a land of freedom has 10 times more citizens incarcerated per million citizen. Chinese citizens has had a income increase of 10% a year for last 40 years. 800million chinese people taken out of poverty. Great job Engineers.
美国这块自由的土地上，每百万人被监禁的人数是中国的十倍。在过去的40年里，中国公民的收入以每年10%的速度增长。8亿中国人民摆脱了贫困。干得好，工程师们。
Harishankar Mishra America a land of freedom has 10 times more citizens incarcerated per million citizen. Chinese citizens has had a income increase of 10% a year for last 40 years. 800million chinese people taken out of poverty. Great job Engineers.
美国这块自由的土地上，每百万人被监禁的人数是中国的十倍。在过去的40年里，中国公民的收入以每年10%的速度增长。8亿中国人民摆脱了贫困。干得好，工程师们。
bktotx884
@Filip Andersson In the 70''''s, according to World Bank, China had 800 million people living in proverty earning less than US$1.90 a day. In the last 30 years, 700 million of them have been lifted out of such a state. China plans to completely eliminate proverty in the next few years.
根据世界银行的数据，在70年代，中国有8亿人每天收入不足1.9美元。在过去30年里，有7亿人摆脱了这种状态。中国计划在未来几年内消除贫困。
@Filip Andersson In the 70''''s, according to World Bank, China had 800 million people living in proverty earning less than US$1.90 a day. In the last 30 years, 700 million of them have been lifted out of such a state. China plans to completely eliminate proverty in the next few years.
根据世界银行的数据，在70年代，中国有8亿人每天收入不足1.9美元。在过去30年里，有7亿人摆脱了这种状态。中国计划在未来几年内消除贫困。
Rich Indian Guy4
Filip Andersson What a stupid comment! Building roads and bridges connect big cities and towns with smaller ones thus helping the local economies, in turn lifting the standard of living in long run. You keep talking about how poor people in China are. Have you any idea of the level of development and uplifting millions of people China has brought about in last decade. You really need to think before you talk mate.
多么愚蠢的评论!修建道路和桥梁将大城市和小城镇连接起来，从而帮助当地经济，从而提高生活水平。
你一直在说中国人有多穷。你知道中国近十年来的发展水平和人民生活水平的提高吗?你真的需要三思而后行，伙计。
Filip Andersson What a stupid comment! Building roads and bridges connect big cities and towns with smaller ones thus helping the local economies, in turn lifting the standard of living in long run. You keep talking about how poor people in China are. Have you any idea of the level of development and uplifting millions of people China has brought about in last decade. You really need to think before you talk mate.
多么愚蠢的评论!修建道路和桥梁将大城市和小城镇连接起来，从而帮助当地经济，从而提高生活水平。
你一直在说中国人有多穷。你知道中国近十年来的发展水平和人民生活水平的提高吗?你真的需要三思而后行，伙计。
很赞 5
收藏