国外科技媒体：高通将发布骁龙865，但仍然没有集成5G基带
正文翻译
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：聂小璐 转载请注明出处
Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon 865 flagship is here — without integrated 5G
高通将发布骁龙865，但仍然没有集成5G基带
Qualcomm has officially announced its next-generation flagship processor for phones — the Snapdragon 865 — but it’ll still need a separate 5G modem to enable 5G instead of an integrated 5G modem built right into the chipset. Traditionally, that means more expensive, power-hungry phones than an integrated solution.
Announced alongside the 865 is Qualcomm’s other new processor, the Snapdragon 765, which will feature integrated 5G. However, it’ll be part of a less powerful processor than the 865, which will likely power the next wave of Android flagships in 2020.
高通公司已经正式官宣其下一代旗舰手机处理--器骁龙865，但该处理器仍然需要外挂单独的基带才能支持5G，而非将5G基带集成在芯片组内部。传统上来说、这意味着会比集成基带的方案更昂贵、也更耗电。
与骁龙865同时发布的、还有另一款全新处理器--骁龙765，该款处理器将采用集成5G基带。然而，这款处理器的性能要比骁龙865弱一些，后者可能在2020年为下一波安卓旗舰机提供芯片组。
Qualcomm has been teasing that it would offer Snapdragon chips with integrated 5G modems since February. It even confirmed at IFA 2019 that it would be offering a 700-series processor with integrated 5G. But it’s still odd that Qualcomm would choose the less powerful chip to serve as its initial integrated 5G product, leaving the next-generation mobile standard as a separate (albeit mandatory) component for its top-of-the-line flagship 865 model.
今年2月以来，高通公司一直在暗示其将要把5G基带集成到骁龙芯片组里面，甚至在2019年国际电子消费品展览会（IFA）上还确认了这一消息：高通将提供一款700系列、集成了5G基带的处理器。但高通公司选择了性能较弱的芯片、作为其初代的集成5G基带的产品，而其下一代顶级旗舰处理器--骁龙865、则采用了单独的外挂5G基带，这就显得有点奇怪了。
the current-generation 855, by requiring a separate 5G modem (in this case, the second-generation X55 model).
相反的是，骁龙 865将以与目前的骁龙855类似的方式来提供5G支持，这种方案需要单独的5G基带（在这一方案中，采用的是第二代X55基带）。
In fact, if manufacturers want to use the new Snapdragon 865, they’ll have to support 5G — Qualcomm tells The Verge that the 865 and X55 are a package deal, there’s no modem on board the 865 at all, and you can’t just make a 4G phone with the 865 by using a different 4G modem.
事实上，如果手机制造商想使用新的骁龙865，他们就必须支持5G。高通公司告诉本网站，骁龙865和X55基带是捆绑销售的，骁龙865上根本没有基带。并且，如果你要使用骁龙865、你就无法使用其他型号的4G基带来生产手机！！
Correction, 6:58PM ET: Qualcomm has confirmed to The Verge that the Snapdragon 865 will be exclusive for 5G phones and will require the companion X55 modem. This article originally stated that manufacturers would be able to offer 4G-only devices using the Snapdragon 865. We regret the error.
更正：美国东部时间下午6:58：高通公司已确认骁龙865将只支持5G手机，并将需要配套的X55基带。本文最初声明“手机制造商将能够采用骁龙865推出4G手机”，我们对这一错误表示遗憾。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：聂小璐 转载请注明出处
Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon 865 flagship is here — without integrated 5G
高通将发布骁龙865，但仍然没有集成5G基带
Qualcomm has officially announced its next-generation flagship processor for phones — the Snapdragon 865 — but it’ll still need a separate 5G modem to enable 5G instead of an integrated 5G modem built right into the chipset. Traditionally, that means more expensive, power-hungry phones than an integrated solution.
Announced alongside the 865 is Qualcomm’s other new processor, the Snapdragon 765, which will feature integrated 5G. However, it’ll be part of a less powerful processor than the 865, which will likely power the next wave of Android flagships in 2020.
高通公司已经正式官宣其下一代旗舰手机处理--器骁龙865，但该处理器仍然需要外挂单独的基带才能支持5G，而非将5G基带集成在芯片组内部。传统上来说、这意味着会比集成基带的方案更昂贵、也更耗电。
与骁龙865同时发布的、还有另一款全新处理器--骁龙765，该款处理器将采用集成5G基带。然而，这款处理器的性能要比骁龙865弱一些，后者可能在2020年为下一波安卓旗舰机提供芯片组。
Qualcomm has been teasing that it would offer Snapdragon chips with integrated 5G modems since February. It even confirmed at IFA 2019 that it would be offering a 700-series processor with integrated 5G. But it’s still odd that Qualcomm would choose the less powerful chip to serve as its initial integrated 5G product, leaving the next-generation mobile standard as a separate (albeit mandatory) component for its top-of-the-line flagship 865 model.
今年2月以来，高通公司一直在暗示其将要把5G基带集成到骁龙芯片组里面，甚至在2019年国际电子消费品展览会（IFA）上还确认了这一消息：高通将提供一款700系列、集成了5G基带的处理器。但高通公司选择了性能较弱的芯片、作为其初代的集成5G基带的产品，而其下一代顶级旗舰处理器--骁龙865、则采用了单独的外挂5G基带，这就显得有点奇怪了。
the current-generation 855, by requiring a separate 5G modem (in this case, the second-generation X55 model).
相反的是，骁龙 865将以与目前的骁龙855类似的方式来提供5G支持，这种方案需要单独的5G基带（在这一方案中，采用的是第二代X55基带）。
In fact, if manufacturers want to use the new Snapdragon 865, they’ll have to support 5G — Qualcomm tells The Verge that the 865 and X55 are a package deal, there’s no modem on board the 865 at all, and you can’t just make a 4G phone with the 865 by using a different 4G modem.
事实上，如果手机制造商想使用新的骁龙865，他们就必须支持5G。高通公司告诉本网站，骁龙865和X55基带是捆绑销售的，骁龙865上根本没有基带。并且，如果你要使用骁龙865、你就无法使用其他型号的4G基带来生产手机！！
Correction, 6:58PM ET: Qualcomm has confirmed to The Verge that the Snapdragon 865 will be exclusive for 5G phones and will require the companion X55 modem. This article originally stated that manufacturers would be able to offer 4G-only devices using the Snapdragon 865. We regret the error.
更正：美国东部时间下午6:58：高通公司已确认骁龙865将只支持5G手机，并将需要配套的X55基带。本文最初声明“手机制造商将能够采用骁龙865推出4G手机”，我们对这一错误表示遗憾。
评论翻译
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：聂小璐 转载请注明出处
Stone Cold Dan Quinn
5G barely has any coverage yet so it really isn’t a big deal. If I have to wait another 3 years for 5G, did I really miss out on anything?
5G的覆盖范围太小了，所以它真不是什么大事。如果还有三年才能用上5G，那么我真的会错过什么么？
Someguyperson
Most markets that buy phones with the 800-class chips in them (US, Korea, Europe) don’t have huge 5G footprints right now. China, the main country in which 700-class chips are sold, has a ton of 5G deployed already and they are only deploying more 5G next year, so it makes sense that all China-destined phones will have integrated 5G while some consumers in the US won’t want to pay for it.
大多数购买骁龙800系列处理器手机的市场（美国、韩国、欧洲）目前5G并没有大范围覆盖。中国是700系列处理器的主要消费者，已经部署了大量的5G基站，而且明年还会部署更多5G基站，因此，所有面向中国的手机都将集成5G基带，而美国的一些消费者将不想为此买单，这是有道理的。
BSmooth439
Manufacturers will be able to add a separate 5G modem (in this case, the second-generation X55 model). But 5G won’t be included by default
They’re probably trying to milk extra money from manufacturers until they have no choice but to integrate them into one piece of silicon.
“手机制造商可以外挂一个5G基带，（在这一方案中，采用的是第二代X55基带）但默认情况下（处理器）不包含5G基带”
高通可能正试图从手机制造商那里榨取额外的资金，直到他们别无选择、只能将基带集成到一块硅晶圆里。
alexjzim
Qualcomm seems to be telling us that it’s only supporting 5G devices with the Snapdragon 865, despite the fact that the processor will still require a separate modem to access 5G networks.
Yea what about areas of the world still deploying LTE, or devices which do not require mobile connectivity? Will Qualcomm force oems to buy modems, or simply withhold the chip altogether? I’m surprised they would have this sort of policy with the antitrust stuff in the past few years.
“高通公司似乎在告诉我们，它只支持使用骁龙 865的5G设备，尽管这款处理器仍需要外挂单独的基带才能访问5G网络。”
好样的，那么那些仍在部署LTE网络的地区怎么办？还有那些不需要移动连接的设备又怎么办呢？高通公司是否会强迫设备制造商购买基带？还是干脆拒绝提供芯片？我很惊讶，在过去的几年里的反垄断政策下、高通还能推出这种策略！！
FriendlyNeighborhoodPoolman
There’s so much wrong here I’m not sure where to even begin.
iPhones only competition is other iPhones
No, it isn’t. The iPhone competes with devices like the Galaxy S and Note series, among others.
People choose OS first.
Says who? Some might. Others choose by what they like, regardless of the OS.
An average consumer couldn’t tell the difference between an iPhone 11 and a Pixel 4 in term of performance.
If that’s true, then explain the constant complaints with the pixel 3’s performance, including things like Bluetooth.
The A series has really only been winning benchmarks the last couple of years.
The A series has been beating other chips since it first came out.
If everything opens apps within milliseconds of eachother, what’s the difference?
It isn’t just about apps. It’s about system stability and long term performance. It’s about battery life. Consumers notice all of that.
楼上的，你的说法错漏百出，我都不知道从哪里开始说起。
“iphone唯一的竞争对手是其他型号的iphone”
说的不对，iPhone需要与Galaxy S系列和Note 系列等设备竞争。
“人们首先选择的是操作系统”。
谁说的？可能有些人是这样的，但其他人只选择他们喜欢的，不会在乎是什么操作系统。
“普通消费者无法区分iPhone11和Pixel4在性能上的区别”
如果这是真的，那么你解释一下为何Pixel3的性能一直饱受的抱怨，包括蓝牙之类的东西。
“A系列处理器霸占这BenchMark的性能榜单也只是最近几年的事”
A系列处理器自问世以来长期都能击败其他芯片。
“如果所有的处理器都能在几毫秒内打开应用程序，那（就性能来说）又有什么分别？”
不仅仅是应用程序，这还关系到系统稳定性和长期性能，也关系到电池寿命，消费者会注意到这一切。
droidface
For all the words you typed you didn’t really have anything of substance to debate.
1.) Yes it does, consumers don’t flip flop between Galaxys and iPhones every year. Some do, most don’t.
2.) People DO choose their OS first. They buy what they know. Or they dip their toes and either stay or run back.
3.) Wow, Bluetooth issues on the Pixel 3! How about when the iPhone 6 bent in half like a hot candy bar? Every phone has bugs every year. If that’s not true, why can I Google iPhone forums loaded with hardware and software issues? Remember all those times a new iOS upxe caused majors issues on tens of millions of iPhones at once? The internet does.
4.) Yes, the A series is a strong chip. So is the Snapdragon series. If you don’t acknowledge that then you’re being disingenuous at best or just an internet troll at worst.
5.) Non-iPhones have been beating iPhones in real world simulated speed tests as well as battery life tests for years. Consumers prioritize their needs when buying things.
You’re right. My Pixel 2 XL is more than 2 years old and still runs excellent.
虽然你打了那么多字，你还是没有说出什么实质性的东西来与我争论。
1）你说的没错，但消费者不会每年都在Galaxy和iPhone之间摇摆不定，有些人会，但大多数人不会。
2）人们确实是首先选择操作系统，他们只买自己了解的东西。或许他们会谨慎的尝试（新东西），要么最终接受新东西、要么用回以前的东西
3.）哇，Pixel3的蓝牙问题！你怎么不说iPhone 6像热糖果一样弯成两半呢？每年、每部手机都有会漏洞。如果这不是真的、为什么我要去百度iPhone论坛、查询硬件和软件的问题？还记得那时候，一个最新的iOS更新导致了数千万iphone的重大BUG吗？互联网可记得这件事。
4）是的，A系列是一种强大的芯片，但骁龙系列同样如此。如果你不承认这一点，那么你要么是虚伪、或者充其量只是个网络喷子。
5）多年来，非iphone手机在真实世界的模拟速度测试、以及电池寿命测试中一直胜过iphone手机。消费者在购买商品时会优先考虑他们的需求。
你说得对。我的Pixel 2 XL已经超过2年了，而且仍然运行良好。
ryaniskira
It isn’t just about apps. It’s about system stability and long term performance. It’s about battery life. Consumers notice all of that.
Yeah, and iPhones are not the end all be all on that note. iOS 13 and Batterygate are two prime examples.
“不仅仅是应用程序，这还关系到系统稳定性和长期性能，也关系到电池寿命，消费者会注意到这一切”
没错，但对于iPhone来说，这不是关键。IOS13和Batterygate就是两个很好的例子。
I am not Spartacus
Well, in terms of performance, according to Anandtech tests, the best Android phone (Note 10) could barely match 3 years younger iPhone 7. In order to do that, they needed an expensive CPU, a lot more RAM and a much bigger battery.
With this latest news, any Android manufacturer that will try to compete against the iPhone 12 will face all the challenges that Apple will face, but without Apple’s custom chips. It will be very hard for any of them to build a flagship phone that is as energy efficient as an iPhone, and that costs a lot cheaper than what Apple will spend to build its own flagships. And of course, with twice as much RAM, they will offer shorter battery life and less than half the performance. That’s something the users always notice.
好吧。根据Anandtech的测试，在性能方面，最好的安卓手机（三星note10）几乎无法与早推出三年的iPhone 7匹敌。为了做到这一点，他们需要一个昂贵的CPU、更多的RAM和更大的电池。
最新消息，任何一家试图与iPhone12竞争的安卓厂商都、将面临苹果将面临的所有挑战，但它们没有苹果的定制芯片。他们中的任何一家都很难打造出一款像iPhone一样节能的旗舰手机、而且在价格上还比苹果便宜很多。当然，在内存是iPhone两倍的情况下，它们的电池寿命更短、性能还不到苹果的一半。这是用户经常注意到的事情。
porath
this isn’t strange, it’s almost definitely an engineering problem. a more powerful cpu/gpu could definitely require more space/power or some other compromise that makes it easier to integrate a 5g modem into the 700 series. idk why people literally always assume companies are just choosing not to do things while simultaneously remarking on how strange it is that they don’t "just" do the thing that they’re "choosing" not to do.
oh well, internet.
这并不奇怪吧，几乎可以肯定高通遇到了工程上的问题。更强大的CPU/GPU肯定需要更多的空间、功率。可能由于其他的一些妥协方案、使得5G基带更容易集成到骁龙700系列芯片里。为什么人们总是认为这些公司是故意不作为？同时又要质疑他们不去做他们“选择”不做的事？
好吧，这就是互联网。
Spatule
That’s comforting my choice to wait 1 more year before renewal.
I am still happy with my Galaxy S9 even if I would like more options on the camera (having a wide angle and something like a 3-5x telephoto would be nice) as I use my smartphone as a "Camera Sketchbook"kind of.
That explains the rumors about the S11 having bigger batteries but that will be offset by this Qualcomm power hungry solution…
In the meanwhile, the iPhone chips are more and more efficient while increasing batteries.
这让我很欣慰，我选择再等一年再续约。
我对我的三星Galaxy S9仍然满意，即使我想在相机上有更多的选择（有一个广角和类似3-5倍的长焦镜头会很好），因为我将智能手机作为一种“相机速写本”之类的东西。
这也解释了关于Galaxy S11拥有更大电池的传闻，但更大的电池、将被高通的高耗电解决方案（指骁龙865+X55外挂基带的方案）所抵消…
与此同时，iPhone芯片在提高电池效率的同时也越来越高效。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：聂小璐 转载请注明出处
Stone Cold Dan Quinn
5G barely has any coverage yet so it really isn’t a big deal. If I have to wait another 3 years for 5G, did I really miss out on anything?
5G的覆盖范围太小了，所以它真不是什么大事。如果还有三年才能用上5G，那么我真的会错过什么么？
Someguyperson
Most markets that buy phones with the 800-class chips in them (US, Korea, Europe) don’t have huge 5G footprints right now. China, the main country in which 700-class chips are sold, has a ton of 5G deployed already and they are only deploying more 5G next year, so it makes sense that all China-destined phones will have integrated 5G while some consumers in the US won’t want to pay for it.
大多数购买骁龙800系列处理器手机的市场（美国、韩国、欧洲）目前5G并没有大范围覆盖。中国是700系列处理器的主要消费者，已经部署了大量的5G基站，而且明年还会部署更多5G基站，因此，所有面向中国的手机都将集成5G基带，而美国的一些消费者将不想为此买单，这是有道理的。
BSmooth439
Manufacturers will be able to add a separate 5G modem (in this case, the second-generation X55 model). But 5G won’t be included by default
They’re probably trying to milk extra money from manufacturers until they have no choice but to integrate them into one piece of silicon.
“手机制造商可以外挂一个5G基带，（在这一方案中，采用的是第二代X55基带）但默认情况下（处理器）不包含5G基带”
高通可能正试图从手机制造商那里榨取额外的资金，直到他们别无选择、只能将基带集成到一块硅晶圆里。
alexjzim
Qualcomm seems to be telling us that it’s only supporting 5G devices with the Snapdragon 865, despite the fact that the processor will still require a separate modem to access 5G networks.
Yea what about areas of the world still deploying LTE, or devices which do not require mobile connectivity? Will Qualcomm force oems to buy modems, or simply withhold the chip altogether? I’m surprised they would have this sort of policy with the antitrust stuff in the past few years.
“高通公司似乎在告诉我们，它只支持使用骁龙 865的5G设备，尽管这款处理器仍需要外挂单独的基带才能访问5G网络。”
好样的，那么那些仍在部署LTE网络的地区怎么办？还有那些不需要移动连接的设备又怎么办呢？高通公司是否会强迫设备制造商购买基带？还是干脆拒绝提供芯片？我很惊讶，在过去的几年里的反垄断政策下、高通还能推出这种策略！！
FriendlyNeighborhoodPoolman
There’s so much wrong here I’m not sure where to even begin.
iPhones only competition is other iPhones
No, it isn’t. The iPhone competes with devices like the Galaxy S and Note series, among others.
People choose OS first.
Says who? Some might. Others choose by what they like, regardless of the OS.
An average consumer couldn’t tell the difference between an iPhone 11 and a Pixel 4 in term of performance.
If that’s true, then explain the constant complaints with the pixel 3’s performance, including things like Bluetooth.
The A series has really only been winning benchmarks the last couple of years.
The A series has been beating other chips since it first came out.
If everything opens apps within milliseconds of eachother, what’s the difference?
It isn’t just about apps. It’s about system stability and long term performance. It’s about battery life. Consumers notice all of that.
楼上的，你的说法错漏百出，我都不知道从哪里开始说起。
“iphone唯一的竞争对手是其他型号的iphone”
说的不对，iPhone需要与Galaxy S系列和Note 系列等设备竞争。
“人们首先选择的是操作系统”。
谁说的？可能有些人是这样的，但其他人只选择他们喜欢的，不会在乎是什么操作系统。
“普通消费者无法区分iPhone11和Pixel4在性能上的区别”
如果这是真的，那么你解释一下为何Pixel3的性能一直饱受的抱怨，包括蓝牙之类的东西。
“A系列处理器霸占这BenchMark的性能榜单也只是最近几年的事”
A系列处理器自问世以来长期都能击败其他芯片。
“如果所有的处理器都能在几毫秒内打开应用程序，那（就性能来说）又有什么分别？”
不仅仅是应用程序，这还关系到系统稳定性和长期性能，也关系到电池寿命，消费者会注意到这一切。
droidface
For all the words you typed you didn’t really have anything of substance to debate.
1.) Yes it does, consumers don’t flip flop between Galaxys and iPhones every year. Some do, most don’t.
2.) People DO choose their OS first. They buy what they know. Or they dip their toes and either stay or run back.
3.) Wow, Bluetooth issues on the Pixel 3! How about when the iPhone 6 bent in half like a hot candy bar? Every phone has bugs every year. If that’s not true, why can I Google iPhone forums loaded with hardware and software issues? Remember all those times a new iOS upxe caused majors issues on tens of millions of iPhones at once? The internet does.
4.) Yes, the A series is a strong chip. So is the Snapdragon series. If you don’t acknowledge that then you’re being disingenuous at best or just an internet troll at worst.
5.) Non-iPhones have been beating iPhones in real world simulated speed tests as well as battery life tests for years. Consumers prioritize their needs when buying things.
You’re right. My Pixel 2 XL is more than 2 years old and still runs excellent.
虽然你打了那么多字，你还是没有说出什么实质性的东西来与我争论。
1）你说的没错，但消费者不会每年都在Galaxy和iPhone之间摇摆不定，有些人会，但大多数人不会。
2）人们确实是首先选择操作系统，他们只买自己了解的东西。或许他们会谨慎的尝试（新东西），要么最终接受新东西、要么用回以前的东西
3.）哇，Pixel3的蓝牙问题！你怎么不说iPhone 6像热糖果一样弯成两半呢？每年、每部手机都有会漏洞。如果这不是真的、为什么我要去百度iPhone论坛、查询硬件和软件的问题？还记得那时候，一个最新的iOS更新导致了数千万iphone的重大BUG吗？互联网可记得这件事。
4）是的，A系列是一种强大的芯片，但骁龙系列同样如此。如果你不承认这一点，那么你要么是虚伪、或者充其量只是个网络喷子。
5）多年来，非iphone手机在真实世界的模拟速度测试、以及电池寿命测试中一直胜过iphone手机。消费者在购买商品时会优先考虑他们的需求。
你说得对。我的Pixel 2 XL已经超过2年了，而且仍然运行良好。
ryaniskira
It isn’t just about apps. It’s about system stability and long term performance. It’s about battery life. Consumers notice all of that.
Yeah, and iPhones are not the end all be all on that note. iOS 13 and Batterygate are two prime examples.
“不仅仅是应用程序，这还关系到系统稳定性和长期性能，也关系到电池寿命，消费者会注意到这一切”
没错，但对于iPhone来说，这不是关键。IOS13和Batterygate就是两个很好的例子。
I am not Spartacus
Well, in terms of performance, according to Anandtech tests, the best Android phone (Note 10) could barely match 3 years younger iPhone 7. In order to do that, they needed an expensive CPU, a lot more RAM and a much bigger battery.
With this latest news, any Android manufacturer that will try to compete against the iPhone 12 will face all the challenges that Apple will face, but without Apple’s custom chips. It will be very hard for any of them to build a flagship phone that is as energy efficient as an iPhone, and that costs a lot cheaper than what Apple will spend to build its own flagships. And of course, with twice as much RAM, they will offer shorter battery life and less than half the performance. That’s something the users always notice.
好吧。根据Anandtech的测试，在性能方面，最好的安卓手机（三星note10）几乎无法与早推出三年的iPhone 7匹敌。为了做到这一点，他们需要一个昂贵的CPU、更多的RAM和更大的电池。
最新消息，任何一家试图与iPhone12竞争的安卓厂商都、将面临苹果将面临的所有挑战，但它们没有苹果的定制芯片。他们中的任何一家都很难打造出一款像iPhone一样节能的旗舰手机、而且在价格上还比苹果便宜很多。当然，在内存是iPhone两倍的情况下，它们的电池寿命更短、性能还不到苹果的一半。这是用户经常注意到的事情。
porath
this isn’t strange, it’s almost definitely an engineering problem. a more powerful cpu/gpu could definitely require more space/power or some other compromise that makes it easier to integrate a 5g modem into the 700 series. idk why people literally always assume companies are just choosing not to do things while simultaneously remarking on how strange it is that they don’t "just" do the thing that they’re "choosing" not to do.
oh well, internet.
这并不奇怪吧，几乎可以肯定高通遇到了工程上的问题。更强大的CPU/GPU肯定需要更多的空间、功率。可能由于其他的一些妥协方案、使得5G基带更容易集成到骁龙700系列芯片里。为什么人们总是认为这些公司是故意不作为？同时又要质疑他们不去做他们“选择”不做的事？
好吧，这就是互联网。
Spatule
That’s comforting my choice to wait 1 more year before renewal.
I am still happy with my Galaxy S9 even if I would like more options on the camera (having a wide angle and something like a 3-5x telephoto would be nice) as I use my smartphone as a "Camera Sketchbook"kind of.
That explains the rumors about the S11 having bigger batteries but that will be offset by this Qualcomm power hungry solution…
In the meanwhile, the iPhone chips are more and more efficient while increasing batteries.
这让我很欣慰，我选择再等一年再续约。
我对我的三星Galaxy S9仍然满意，即使我想在相机上有更多的选择（有一个广角和类似3-5倍的长焦镜头会很好），因为我将智能手机作为一种“相机速写本”之类的东西。
这也解释了关于Galaxy S11拥有更大电池的传闻，但更大的电池、将被高通的高耗电解决方案（指骁龙865+X55外挂基带的方案）所抵消…
与此同时，iPhone芯片在提高电池效率的同时也越来越高效。
很赞 0
收藏