攻击性武器禁令启动后，新西兰人上交了5万支枪
正文翻译
WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — New Zealand authorities said Saturday their country will be a safer place after owners handed in more than 50,000 guns during a buyback program following a ban on assault weapons. But critics say the process was flawed and many owners have illegally stashed their firearms.
新西兰惠灵顿（美联社）— 周六，新西兰当局表示，在禁止攻击性武器后实施的回购计划中，这类武器的拥有者上交了5万多支枪支，今后他们的国家将变成一个更安全的地方。但批评人士表示，这一过程存在缺陷，许多持枪者会非法藏匿枪支。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：卡思 转载请注明出处
New Zealanders hand in 50,000 guns after assault weapon ban
攻击性武器禁令启动后，新西兰人上交了5万支枪
攻击性武器禁令启动后，新西兰人上交了5万支枪
WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — New Zealand authorities said Saturday their country will be a safer place after owners handed in more than 50,000 guns during a buyback program following a ban on assault weapons. But critics say the process was flawed and many owners have illegally stashed their firearms.
新西兰惠灵顿（美联社）— 周六，新西兰当局表示，在禁止攻击性武器后实施的回购计划中，这类武器的拥有者上交了5万多支枪支，今后他们的国家将变成一个更安全的地方。但批评人士表示，这一过程存在缺陷，许多持枪者会非法藏匿枪支。
The government banned the most lethal types of semi-automatic weapons less than a month after a lone gunman in March killed 51 worshippers at two Christchurch mosques. The police then launched a six-month program to buy the newly banned weapons from owners.
今年3月，一名持枪歹徒在克赖斯特彻奇的两座清真寺中杀害了51名信徒，政府在不到一个月的时间内禁止了最致命的半自动武器。随后警方启动了一项为期6个月的计划，即向民众回购这些最新被禁的武器。
今年3月，一名持枪歹徒在克赖斯特彻奇的两座清真寺中杀害了51名信徒，政府在不到一个月的时间内禁止了最致命的半自动武器。随后警方启动了一项为期6个月的计划，即向民众回购这些最新被禁的武器。
The buyback ended midnight Friday, with gun collection events staying open late as police reported in a surge in last-minute returns.
回购截止到周五午夜，枪支收缴活动一直持续到很晚，因为警方报告一直到最后一分钟上交的枪支都未见减少。
回购截止到周五午夜，枪支收缴活动一直持续到很晚，因为警方报告一直到最后一分钟上交的枪支都未见减少。
Provisional figures indicate 33,000 people handed in 51,000 guns, and another 5,000 guns as part of a parallel amnesty in which owners could hand over any type of firearm without any questions being asked but without getting compensated.
当前的数字显示，一共有3.3万人上交了5.1万支枪支，另外还有5000支枪，是和回购同时进行的大赦行动中缴获的，在大赦行动中，所有人都可以上交任何类型的枪支，不用受到警方询问，但也不会得到赔偿。
当前的数字显示，一共有3.3万人上交了5.1万支枪支，另外还有5000支枪，是和回购同时进行的大赦行动中缴获的，在大赦行动中，所有人都可以上交任何类型的枪支，不用受到警方询问，但也不会得到赔偿。
Owners also modified another 2,700 guns to make them legally compliant, while police said they had seized a further 1,800 guns from gangs since March. And police said they''''''''re in the process of collecting another 1,600 guns from gun dealers.
持枪者们还改装了另外2700支枪，使它们变得合法合规，另外警方表示，自3月份以来，他们从帮派团伙手中缴获了1800支枪。警方还说他们正在从枪支贩子那里收集另外1600支枪。
持枪者们还改装了另外2700支枪，使它们变得合法合规，另外警方表示，自3月份以来，他们从帮派团伙手中缴获了1800支枪。警方还说他们正在从枪支贩子那里收集另外1600支枪。
Police Minister Stuart Nash told reporters Saturday that criminals would find it harder to get their hands on assault weapons because they tended to steal them from lawful owners, but those weapons would now be out of circulation.
警察部长Stuart Nash星期六对记者说，犯罪分子现在很难拿到攻击性武器了，因为他们往往是从合法拥有者手中偷走这些武器，但这些武器现在已经不流通了。
警察部长Stuart Nash星期六对记者说，犯罪分子现在很难拿到攻击性武器了，因为他们往往是从合法拥有者手中偷走这些武器，但这些武器现在已经不流通了。
Police Deputy Commissioner Mike Clement thanked gun owners for doing the right thing. He acknowledged in a statement it had been “a difficult process for some people.”
警察局副局长Mike Clement特感谢持枪者们做了正确的事情。他在一份声明中承认，“这对一些人来说是一个艰难的过程”
警察局副局长Mike Clement特感谢持枪者们做了正确的事情。他在一份声明中承认，“这对一些人来说是一个艰难的过程”
Both Nash and Clement said the country was now safer than it had been before the March attacks.
警方都表示，现在的新西兰比3月份被袭击前更加安全了。
警方都表示，现在的新西兰比3月份被袭击前更加安全了。
But Nicole McKee, a spokeswoman for the advocacy group Council of Licensed Firearms Owners, said owners had kept about two-thirds of the banned weapons because they had lost faith in the government and hadn''''''''t been offered adequate compensation.
但持枪者权益组织理事会发言人Nicole McKee表示，实际上持枪者保留了约三分之二的违禁武器，因为他们对政府失去了信心，也没有得到足够的补偿。
但持枪者权益组织理事会发言人Nicole McKee表示，实际上持枪者保留了约三分之二的违禁武器，因为他们对政府失去了信心，也没有得到足够的补偿。
“They never overcame being blamed by authorities for being somehow responsible for a heinous act of terrorism — something they would never do," McKee said in a statement.
McKee在一份声明中说：“他们不服被当局指责，要对一次令人发指的恐怖主义行为负责——他们永远不会做出恐怖主义的行为。”
McKee在一份声明中说：“他们不服被当局指责，要对一次令人发指的恐怖主义行为负责——他们永远不会做出恐怖主义的行为。”
The ban on assault weapons was strongly backed by lawmakers in an historic 119-1 vote after the mosque attacks. Lawmakers are now considering further restrictions, including creating a register to track all guns.
这项禁止攻击性武器的禁令在清真寺袭击事件后以119票对1票的历史性投票得到了立法者的强烈支持。立法者现在正在考虑设置进一步的限制，包括建立一个登记册来追踪所有枪支。
这项禁止攻击性武器的禁令在清真寺袭击事件后以119票对1票的历史性投票得到了立法者的强烈支持。立法者现在正在考虑设置进一步的限制，包括建立一个登记册来追踪所有枪支。
Police figures indicate the government paid out just over 100 million New Zealand dollars ($66 million) to compensate owners during the buyback.
警方数据显示，政府在回购过程中仅支付了1亿多新西兰元（约合6600万美元）补偿给那些枪支拥有者。
投票
警方数据显示，政府在回购过程中仅支付了1亿多新西兰元（约合6600万美元）补偿给那些枪支拥有者。
投票
Is Washington doing enough about gun control?
华盛顿在枪支管制方面做得够好了吗？
是的 Yes 54%
不够 No 42%
不确定 Undecided 4%
华盛顿在枪支管制方面做得够好了吗？
是的 Yes 54%
不够 No 42%
不确定 Undecided 4%
评论翻译
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：卡思 转载请注明出处
jerry
So, ok, let me get this straight. Since the year 1772 (that’s right, not a typo, 250 years) there’s been a grand total of 1 mass shooting with “assault weapons” in New Zealand, all the while there have been tens of thousands of people in possession of such weapons in that country, as the article reveals. Now we are to believe that taking away these weapons is going to make the country safer? Just a mere glance at the statistics in New Zealand should suggest to the casual observer that “assault weapons” were never a public safety concern there and still aren’t.
好吧，我就直说了。自1772年（没错，不是打错字，就是250年了）以来，新西兰总共发生过一起使用“攻击性武器”的大规模枪击事件，而正如文章所说的那样，一直以来该国拥有此类武器的高达数万人。现在要我们相信，拿走这些武器会让国家变得更安全？随便看看新西兰的统计数据就知道，“攻击性武器”在新西兰从来就没有构成过公共安全问题，现在也不是。
So, ok, let me get this straight. Since the year 1772 (that’s right, not a typo, 250 years) there’s been a grand total of 1 mass shooting with “assault weapons” in New Zealand, all the while there have been tens of thousands of people in possession of such weapons in that country, as the article reveals. Now we are to believe that taking away these weapons is going to make the country safer? Just a mere glance at the statistics in New Zealand should suggest to the casual observer that “assault weapons” were never a public safety concern there and still aren’t.
好吧，我就直说了。自1772年（没错，不是打错字，就是250年了）以来，新西兰总共发生过一起使用“攻击性武器”的大规模枪击事件，而正如文章所说的那样，一直以来该国拥有此类武器的高达数万人。现在要我们相信，拿走这些武器会让国家变得更安全？随便看看新西兰的统计数据就知道，“攻击性武器”在新西兰从来就没有构成过公共安全问题，现在也不是。
Tom
First, everyone needs to realize current gun laws in the USA are not enforced.
Penalty for a felon in possession of a firearm is 2-10 years jail time. Majority receive minimum or the charge are dropped all together. Enforce these laws to the maximum
Make sure the FBI, with other police agencies do a better job with background checks. And in the case of the FBI, when you have information on situations like Parkland, the recent Navy shooting and a couple others, follow through, don’t ignore it.
Watch the Democratic debates! Then decide if this country would be safer banning democrats than guns
首先，每个人都要意识到美国现有的枪支管理法没有得到执行。
对持有枪支的重罪犯判处2-10年监禁。大多数人最终是按照最轻的刑罚来判，或者指控被撤销。这已经是这些法律能执行的最大限度了
联邦调查局和其他警察局应确保在背景调查方面做得更好一些。以联邦调查局为例，当你掌握了帕克兰中学枪击案、最近的海军基地枪击案以及其他一些案件的信息后，请继续跟进，不要忽视这些信息。
去看看民主党辩论吧！然后再决定，这个国家是不是禁止民主党人比禁止枪支更安全
First, everyone needs to realize current gun laws in the USA are not enforced.
Penalty for a felon in possession of a firearm is 2-10 years jail time. Majority receive minimum or the charge are dropped all together. Enforce these laws to the maximum
Make sure the FBI, with other police agencies do a better job with background checks. And in the case of the FBI, when you have information on situations like Parkland, the recent Navy shooting and a couple others, follow through, don’t ignore it.
Watch the Democratic debates! Then decide if this country would be safer banning democrats than guns
首先，每个人都要意识到美国现有的枪支管理法没有得到执行。
对持有枪支的重罪犯判处2-10年监禁。大多数人最终是按照最轻的刑罚来判，或者指控被撤销。这已经是这些法律能执行的最大限度了
联邦调查局和其他警察局应确保在背景调查方面做得更好一些。以联邦调查局为例，当你掌握了帕克兰中学枪击案、最近的海军基地枪击案以及其他一些案件的信息后，请继续跟进，不要忽视这些信息。
去看看民主党辩论吧！然后再决定，这个国家是不是禁止民主党人比禁止枪支更安全
Jerry
I have yet to understand how disarming the law abiding makes one safer?
我还是没明白，解除了法律允许范围内的武装，怎么能使一个人更安全呢？
I have yet to understand how disarming the law abiding makes one safer?
我还是没明白，解除了法律允许范围内的武装，怎么能使一个人更安全呢？
HS-LD
What does New Zealand have planned for the future that would require the disarming of law abiding citizens?
新西兰未来有什么计划？要求解除守法公民的武装么？
What does New Zealand have planned for the future that would require the disarming of law abiding citizens?
新西兰未来有什么计划？要求解除守法公民的武装么？
illflip
When all the guns have been banned,
When all the words have been censored,
When all the history has been erased,
When all the freedom has been taken,
Only then will you realize why our right to bear arms was so high on the list.
当所有的枪支都被禁止的时候，
当所有的文字都被审查的时候，
当所有的历史都被抹去的时候，
当所有的自由都被剥夺的时候，
到了那时，你才会明白为什么我们拥有武器的权利会如此重要。
When all the guns have been banned,
When all the words have been censored,
When all the history has been erased,
When all the freedom has been taken,
Only then will you realize why our right to bear arms was so high on the list.
当所有的枪支都被禁止的时候，
当所有的文字都被审查的时候，
当所有的历史都被抹去的时候，
当所有的自由都被剥夺的时候，
到了那时，你才会明白为什么我们拥有武器的权利会如此重要。
Rick
This is government propaganda. I have seen other accounts that said very few guns had been turned in. This article is an attempt by the NZ government and by the AP to convince the public that gun confiscation is the right thing to do and that everyone should cooperate. Our 2nd amendment does not exist in NZ but it does here.
这是政府的宣传。我看到其他的报道都说没有什么枪支被上缴。这篇文章是新西兰政府和美联社试图说服公众：没收枪支是正确的做法，每个人都应该合作。我们的第二修正案并没有在新西兰发布，但它又确实存在着。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
This is government propaganda. I have seen other accounts that said very few guns had been turned in. This article is an attempt by the NZ government and by the AP to convince the public that gun confiscation is the right thing to do and that everyone should cooperate. Our 2nd amendment does not exist in NZ but it does here.
这是政府的宣传。我看到其他的报道都说没有什么枪支被上缴。这篇文章是新西兰政府和美联社试图说服公众：没收枪支是正确的做法，每个人都应该合作。我们的第二修正案并没有在新西兰发布，但它又确实存在着。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
kaumanua
It will not be safer from criminals because guaranteed criminals did not turn in their weapons, only the law abiding people.
罪犯必定不会交出他们的武器，只有守法的人民才会上交，所以对群众来说，这样做并不会让社会环境更安全。
It will not be safer from criminals because guaranteed criminals did not turn in their weapons, only the law abiding people.
罪犯必定不会交出他们的武器，只有守法的人民才会上交，所以对群众来说，这样做并不会让社会环境更安全。
beth
they can only take guns away from law abiding citizens but not from criminals
他们只能从守法的公民手中夺走枪支，却不能从罪犯手中夺走
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
they can only take guns away from law abiding citizens but not from criminals
他们只能从守法的公民手中夺走枪支，却不能从罪犯手中夺走
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Libtard Destroyer
And how are law abiding. Citizens supposed to defend themselves???
遵纪守法的公民在怎么办。他们还能自卫吗？？？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
And how are law abiding. Citizens supposed to defend themselves???
遵纪守法的公民在怎么办。他们还能自卫吗？？？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
HansV
Not having assault weapons will make the Chinese takeover less bloody. New Zealand should have studied the way they handle gun possession in Switzerland, everyone is required to be proficient and serve a short period of military training. The Swiss don''''''''t tolerate misuse of guns, including transport outside of the home in non-approved fashion.
But the country by design has a ready force of citizens to repeal any invading force. Much less expensive than having to have a large standing army.
中国管辖的地区没有攻击性武器，也就少了很少流血事件。新西兰应该研究一下瑞士处理持枪问题的方法，在那要求每个人都要熟悉枪支，并接受短期的军事训练。瑞士不允许滥用枪支，包括未经批准的情况下在国外运输枪支。
但这个国家刻意培养了一支民众力量，随时准备好干掉任何侵略势力。这比拥有一支庞大的常备军要便宜得多。
Not having assault weapons will make the Chinese takeover less bloody. New Zealand should have studied the way they handle gun possession in Switzerland, everyone is required to be proficient and serve a short period of military training. The Swiss don''''''''t tolerate misuse of guns, including transport outside of the home in non-approved fashion.
But the country by design has a ready force of citizens to repeal any invading force. Much less expensive than having to have a large standing army.
中国管辖的地区没有攻击性武器，也就少了很少流血事件。新西兰应该研究一下瑞士处理持枪问题的方法，在那要求每个人都要熟悉枪支，并接受短期的军事训练。瑞士不允许滥用枪支，包括未经批准的情况下在国外运输枪支。
但这个国家刻意培养了一支民众力量，随时准备好干掉任何侵略势力。这比拥有一支庞大的常备军要便宜得多。
al
Government mass murder carried out throughout history and almost always immediately following the disarmament of the public which usually involves staged false flag events to justify the disarmament:50+ million dead: 12+ million dead: Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) ? concentration camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs8+ million dead: Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908)6+ million dead: Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)5+ million dead: Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)2+ million dead: Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22)1.7 million dead: Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)1.6 million dead: Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)1.5 million dead: Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78)1 million dead: Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)900,000 dead: Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982)800,000 dead: Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)
历史上发生的政府大屠杀，几乎总是紧随解除民众武装之后进行的：死亡人数1200多万：阿道夫·希特勒（德国，1939-1945），包括集中营、平民死亡和俄罗斯战俘死亡；死亡人数800多万：比利时利奥波德二世（刚果，1886-1908）；死亡人数600多万：斯大林（苏联，1932-1939）；死亡人数500多万：东条英机（日本，1941-1944）；死亡人数200多万：伊斯梅尔·恩维尔（土耳其，1915-22）；死亡人数170万：波尔布特（柬埔寨，1975-79）；死亡人数160万：金日成（朝鲜，1948年至1994年）；死亡人数150万：孟吉斯图（埃塞俄比亚，1975年至1978年）；死亡人数100万：雅库布·戈文（比亚法拉，1967年至1970年）；死亡人数90万：勃列日涅夫（阿富汗，1979年至1982年）；死亡人数80万：让·坎班达（卢旺达，1994年）。
Government mass murder carried out throughout history and almost always immediately following the disarmament of the public which usually involves staged false flag events to justify the disarmament:50+ million dead: 12+ million dead: Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) ? concentration camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs8+ million dead: Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908)6+ million dead: Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)5+ million dead: Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)2+ million dead: Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22)1.7 million dead: Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)1.6 million dead: Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)1.5 million dead: Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78)1 million dead: Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)900,000 dead: Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982)800,000 dead: Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)
历史上发生的政府大屠杀，几乎总是紧随解除民众武装之后进行的：死亡人数1200多万：阿道夫·希特勒（德国，1939-1945），包括集中营、平民死亡和俄罗斯战俘死亡；死亡人数800多万：比利时利奥波德二世（刚果，1886-1908）；死亡人数600多万：斯大林（苏联，1932-1939）；死亡人数500多万：东条英机（日本，1941-1944）；死亡人数200多万：伊斯梅尔·恩维尔（土耳其，1915-22）；死亡人数170万：波尔布特（柬埔寨，1975-79）；死亡人数160万：金日成（朝鲜，1948年至1994年）；死亡人数150万：孟吉斯图（埃塞俄比亚，1975年至1978年）；死亡人数100万：雅库布·戈文（比亚法拉，1967年至1970年）；死亡人数90万：勃列日涅夫（阿富汗，1979年至1982年）；死亡人数80万：让·坎班达（卢旺达，1994年）。
Cardiovert
“owners had kept about two-thirds of the banned weapons“
Lmao @ liberals who think gun confiscation is effective.
“持枪者保留了约三分之二的违禁武器”
笑死我了，自由主义者还觉得没收枪支是有效的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
“owners had kept about two-thirds of the banned weapons“
Lmao @ liberals who think gun confiscation is effective.
“持枪者保留了约三分之二的违禁武器”
笑死我了，自由主义者还觉得没收枪支是有效的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Rob
So no actual assault weapons were turned over, just guns.
所以其实没有什么真正的攻击性武器，就是枪而已。
So no actual assault weapons were turned over, just guns.
所以其实没有什么真正的攻击性武器，就是枪而已。
AO2
"buyback program" ?, what I saw was a mandatory surrender that accounted for approximately 15 % of LAW ABIDING registered guns CONFISCATED they will now go after the remaining 85 % with criminal warrants, sad
“回购计划”？我看到的是强制收缴，大约15%的守法登记的枪支被没收了，他们现在还打算把剩余的85%按照份刑事搜查也缴了，太令人伤心了。
"buyback program" ?, what I saw was a mandatory surrender that accounted for approximately 15 % of LAW ABIDING registered guns CONFISCATED they will now go after the remaining 85 % with criminal warrants, sad
“回购计划”？我看到的是强制收缴，大约15%的守法登记的枪支被没收了，他们现在还打算把剩余的85%按照份刑事搜查也缴了，太令人伤心了。
Anthony G
Law-abiding citizens turning in banned weapons prevents no crime. See, these people obey the law..they would not commit a crime with these weapons in the first place.
现在是让遵纪守法的公民交出违禁武器以防犯罪。但是你看，这些人是遵守法律的……他们本来就不会用这些武器犯罪。
Law-abiding citizens turning in banned weapons prevents no crime. See, these people obey the law..they would not commit a crime with these weapons in the first place.
现在是让遵纪守法的公民交出违禁武器以防犯罪。但是你看，这些人是遵守法律的……他们本来就不会用这些武器犯罪。
MK1 MOD ZERO
good for them. compliant subjects are always rewarded with beneficial rulers.
对他们来说挺好的。顺从的臣民总是会得到统治者的奖赏。
good for them. compliant subjects are always rewarded with beneficial rulers.
对他们来说挺好的。顺从的臣民总是会得到统治者的奖赏。
David
Goverments don''''''''t ban guns to protect the citizens. They do so to protect the government.
政府不是为了保护公民而禁枪。他们这样做是为了保护政府。
Goverments don''''''''t ban guns to protect the citizens. They do so to protect the government.
政府不是为了保护公民而禁枪。他们这样做是为了保护政府。
Anthony
The only ones who sold back their guns were law abiding citizens.
真正把枪支上交回购的只有守法的公民。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The only ones who sold back their guns were law abiding citizens.
真正把枪支上交回购的只有守法的公民。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
David L.
Well, like our Founding Father Ben once said, those that give up their rights for security deserve neither.
好吧，就像我们的开国元勋富兰克林曾经说过的那样，那些为了得到一时安全而放弃永久自由的人，既不能得到自由也不配得到安全。
Well, like our Founding Father Ben once said, those that give up their rights for security deserve neither.
好吧，就像我们的开国元勋富兰克林曾经说过的那样，那些为了得到一时安全而放弃永久自由的人，既不能得到自由也不配得到安全。
james o
Government always has a plan to confiscate weapons from law-abiding citizens, but never has a plan to confiscate weapons from criminals.
政府总是有计划地没收守法公民的武器，但从来没有计划去没收罪犯的武器。
Government always has a plan to confiscate weapons from law-abiding citizens, but never has a plan to confiscate weapons from criminals.
政府总是有计划地没收守法公民的武器，但从来没有计划去没收罪犯的武器。
SIERRA SIX ACTUAL
Thank God and our Founding Fathers that WE in America have a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to WEAPONS FOR SELF DEFENSE and DEFENSE OF FREEDOM. Something most poor souls in the world don''''''''t have, and which makes them SUBJECTS of Their Government NOT CITIZENS with RIGHTS NO ONE CAN EASILY TAKE.
感谢上帝和我们的开国国父们，我们美国有宪法赋予的自卫和拥有自卫武器的权利。世界上灵魂最贫穷的人没有这些东西，这使得他们成为政府的臣民，而不是成为拥有外人夺不走的权利的公民。
Thank God and our Founding Fathers that WE in America have a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to WEAPONS FOR SELF DEFENSE and DEFENSE OF FREEDOM. Something most poor souls in the world don''''''''t have, and which makes them SUBJECTS of Their Government NOT CITIZENS with RIGHTS NO ONE CAN EASILY TAKE.
感谢上帝和我们的开国国父们，我们美国有宪法赋予的自卫和拥有自卫武器的权利。世界上灵魂最贫穷的人没有这些东西，这使得他们成为政府的臣民，而不是成为拥有外人夺不走的权利的公民。
FredF
Chances any of those 50k guns would ever be used in a crime are practically zero, because the people handing them in respect laws.
这5万支枪中的任何一支被用于犯罪的可能性几乎为零，因为交出枪的人都是遵守法律的。
Chances any of those 50k guns would ever be used in a crime are practically zero, because the people handing them in respect laws.
这5万支枪中的任何一支被用于犯罪的可能性几乎为零，因为交出枪的人都是遵守法律的。
H
Every house in Switzerland has a weapon. How many shootings a year over there?
瑞士家家户户都有武器。那边一年发生几起枪击案呢？
Every house in Switzerland has a weapon. How many shootings a year over there?
瑞士家家户户都有武器。那边一年发生几起枪击案呢？
Just a tiny bit right.
0.000 criminals turned in their guns, I''''''''d bet my life.
我敢打赌，有0.000个罪犯交出了枪。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
0.000 criminals turned in their guns, I''''''''d bet my life.
我敢打赌，有0.000个罪犯交出了枪。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Sachi
This is the reason I cancelled our trip to NZ this Christmas. I couldn''''''''t disagree more with their gun ''''''''force-back'''''''' program.
这就是我取消今年圣诞节新西兰之行的原因。我完全不同意他们的“强制回购”枪支计划。
This is the reason I cancelled our trip to NZ this Christmas. I couldn''''''''t disagree more with their gun ''''''''force-back'''''''' program.
这就是我取消今年圣诞节新西兰之行的原因。我完全不同意他们的“强制回购”枪支计划。
dave
Not sure what the population density of firearms in New Zealand was, but there are probably more than 50,000 guns in my city alone. I suspect that quite a few didn''''''''t get turned in.
不知道新西兰枪支的人口密度是多少，但仅我在的城市大概就有5万多支枪支。我怀疑有相当一部分人没有上交。
Not sure what the population density of firearms in New Zealand was, but there are probably more than 50,000 guns in my city alone. I suspect that quite a few didn''''''''t get turned in.
不知道新西兰枪支的人口密度是多少，但仅我在的城市大概就有5万多支枪支。我怀疑有相当一部分人没有上交。
WiseOne
Admiral Yamamoto who crafted the attack on Pearl Harbor had attended Harvard University 1919-1921 & was Naval Attaché to the U. S. 1925-28. Most of our Navy was destroyed at Pearl Harbor and our Army had been deprived of funding and was ill prepared to defend the country.
When Yamamoto was asked why Japan did not follow up the Pearl Harbor attack with an invasion of the U. S. Mainland, his reply was that he had lived in the U. S. and knew that almost all houeholds had guns. He went on to say he was more afraid of armed American civilians than the US Army.
山本上将，那个策划了对珍珠港的袭击的人曾在1919-1921年就读于哈佛大学，1925-28年任驻美国海军武官。我们的大部分海军在珍珠港被毁了，我们的军队缺乏资金，无法做好保卫国家的准备。
当山本被问到日本为什么不在珍珠港袭击事件之后入侵美国大陆时，他的回答是他在美国生活过，知道几乎所有的家庭都有枪。他接着说，比起美国军队，他更害怕武装的美国平民。
Admiral Yamamoto who crafted the attack on Pearl Harbor had attended Harvard University 1919-1921 & was Naval Attaché to the U. S. 1925-28. Most of our Navy was destroyed at Pearl Harbor and our Army had been deprived of funding and was ill prepared to defend the country.
When Yamamoto was asked why Japan did not follow up the Pearl Harbor attack with an invasion of the U. S. Mainland, his reply was that he had lived in the U. S. and knew that almost all houeholds had guns. He went on to say he was more afraid of armed American civilians than the US Army.
山本上将，那个策划了对珍珠港的袭击的人曾在1919-1921年就读于哈佛大学，1925-28年任驻美国海军武官。我们的大部分海军在珍珠港被毁了，我们的军队缺乏资金，无法做好保卫国家的准备。
当山本被问到日本为什么不在珍珠港袭击事件之后入侵美国大陆时，他的回答是他在美国生活过，知道几乎所有的家庭都有枪。他接着说，比起美国军队，他更害怕武装的美国平民。
Old Grey One
They started gun control there over 30 years ago. Every family has about three home break ins a year now. Gun control is wonderful for "wealth distribution."
他们在30多年前就开始了枪支管制。现在每个家庭一年大概有三次被强行闯入。枪支管制对“财富分配”很有好处
They started gun control there over 30 years ago. Every family has about three home break ins a year now. Gun control is wonderful for "wealth distribution."
他们在30多年前就开始了枪支管制。现在每个家庭一年大概有三次被强行闯入。枪支管制对“财富分配”很有好处
Cardiovert
It’s a good thing Americans have a right to keep and bears arms, which is guaranteed by the constitution.
美国人有权持有武器，这是宪法所保证的，这真是件好事
It’s a good thing Americans have a right to keep and bears arms, which is guaranteed by the constitution.
美国人有权持有武器，这是宪法所保证的，这真是件好事
VictorS
I would bet only law abiding citizens did so, not criminals. Who''''''''s safer now - criminals are.
我敢打赌只有守法的公民会这样做，罪犯不会。现在谁更安全了呢----当然是罪犯。
I would bet only law abiding citizens did so, not criminals. Who''''''''s safer now - criminals are.
我敢打赌只有守法的公民会这样做，罪犯不会。现在谁更安全了呢----当然是罪犯。
america
according to the numbers this is a very small amount in new zealand so that didn''''''''t work.
根据统计数据，这五万支枪在新西兰只是一个很小的数目，所以这样做不会起作用。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
according to the numbers this is a very small amount in new zealand so that didn''''''''t work.
根据统计数据，这五万支枪在新西兰只是一个很小的数目，所以这样做不会起作用。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
FRANK
NO THANKS, A Dis-Armed Nation is A Nation of VICTIMS ! Worked out Great for Jews in WW2, Castro''''''''s Cuba and No Korea !
Response Times for Police------ 10 to 45 minutes !
Legal Gun Owner ____________5 to 20 SECONDS !
才不要这样，谢谢，一个没有武装的国家就是一个任人宰割的国家！二战中的犹太人，卡斯特罗统治的古巴，朝鲜，都很好地证明了这一点！
警察的反应时间---10到45分钟！
合法持枪人反应时间---5到20秒！
NO THANKS, A Dis-Armed Nation is A Nation of VICTIMS ! Worked out Great for Jews in WW2, Castro''''''''s Cuba and No Korea !
Response Times for Police------ 10 to 45 minutes !
Legal Gun Owner ____________5 to 20 SECONDS !
才不要这样，谢谢，一个没有武装的国家就是一个任人宰割的国家！二战中的犹太人，卡斯特罗统治的古巴，朝鲜，都很好地证明了这一点！
警察的反应时间---10到45分钟！
合法持枪人反应时间---5到20秒！
很赞 3
收藏