英国“下决心”要推动卢旺达遣送航班，并可能退出人权公约以强制航班成行
正文翻译
新闻：
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
UK 'committed' to Rwanda deportations and could exit human rights convention to force them through
-ITV News Political Reporter Shehab Khan reports on the growing calls from some Tory MPs for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights
英国“下决心”要推动卢旺达遣送航班，并可能退出人权公约以强制航班成行
——ITV新闻政治记者谢哈布·汗报道了一些保守党议员日益增长的要求英国退出《欧洲人权公约》的呼声
-ITV News Political Reporter Shehab Khan reports on the growing calls from some Tory MPs for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights
英国“下决心”要推动卢旺达遣送航班，并可能退出人权公约以强制航班成行
——ITV新闻政治记者谢哈布·汗报道了一些保守党议员日益增长的要求英国退出《欧洲人权公约》的呼声
新闻：
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The home secretary has said she is "committed" to a policy of sending asylum seekers more than 4,000 miles away to Rwanda, after an eleventh hour decision in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) blocked last night's planned deportation flight.
在欧洲人权法院在最后一刻决定阻止昨晚（6.14）计划的遣送航班后，内政大臣表示，她“下决心”要落实一项将寻求庇护者送往4000多英里外的卢旺达的政策。
在欧洲人权法院在最后一刻决定阻止昨晚（6.14）计划的遣送航班后，内政大臣表示，她“下决心”要落实一项将寻求庇护者送往4000多英里外的卢旺达的政策。
Priti Patel said she welcomed decisions made in the UK's domestic courts to remove migrants form the flight, but said it was "disappointing and surprising" to learn of the ECHR's intervention.
普里蒂·帕特尔表示，她欢迎英国国内法院做出的将移民带离遣送航班的决定，但她表示，得知欧洲人权法院的干预是“令人失望和惊讶的”。
普里蒂·帕特尔表示，她欢迎英国国内法院做出的将移民带离遣送航班的决定，但她表示，得知欧洲人权法院的干预是“令人失望和惊讶的”。
Downing Street said the government will do "whatever it takes" to ensure deportation flights to Rwanda go ahead and "all options are on the table" - including leaving the European Convention on Human Rights.
唐宁街表示，政府将“不惜一切代价”确保卢旺达遣送航班的顺利进行，“所有选择都摆在桌面上”，包括退出欧洲人权法院。
唐宁街表示，政府将“不惜一切代价”确保卢旺达遣送航班的顺利进行，“所有选择都摆在桌面上”，包括退出欧洲人权法院。
The Rwanda flight - which had up to seven people on board by Tuesday evening - had been due to take off at around 10.30pm from a military airport in Wiltshire but last minute decisions by the ECHR meant all passengers had their tickets cancelled.
这趟卢旺达遣送航班（周二晚，有7名被遣送者）原定于晚上10:30左右从威尔特郡的一个军用机场起飞，但欧洲人权法院会在最后一刻的决定意味着所有这些乘客的机票都被取消了。
这趟卢旺达遣送航班（周二晚，有7名被遣送者）原定于晚上10:30左右从威尔特郡的一个军用机场起飞，但欧洲人权法院会在最后一刻的决定意味着所有这些乘客的机票都被取消了。
Despite the government's attempts to reduce Channel crossings, around 150 more people were brought ashore in Dover on Wednesday as low winds create ideal weather conditions for such attempts.
尽管英国政府试图减少横渡英吉利海峡的人数，但周三又有大约150人在多佛上岸，因为低等级风为这种偷渡尝试创造了理想的天气条件。
尽管英国政府试图减少横渡英吉利海峡的人数，但周三又有大约150人在多佛上岸，因为低等级风为这种偷渡尝试创造了理想的天气条件。
The home secretary has insisted that the UK remains committed to the Rwandan deportation policy, saying that "preparations for the next flights have already begun".
英国内政大臣坚称，英国将继续执行卢旺达遣送政策，并表示“下一趟航班的准备工作已经开始”。
英国内政大臣坚称，英国将继续执行卢旺达遣送政策，并表示“下一趟航班的准备工作已经开始”。
Number 10, asked if the government could withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights, said: "We are keeping all options on the table including any further legal reforms that may be necessary.
在被问及政府是否会退出欧洲人权法院时，唐宁街10号说：“我们将保留所有可能的选择，包括任何必要的进一步法律改革。
在被问及政府是否会退出欧洲人权法院时，唐宁街10号说：“我们将保留所有可能的选择，包括任何必要的进一步法律改革。
"We will look at all of the legislation and processes in this round."
“我们将研究这一轮的所有立法和程序。”
“我们将研究这一轮的所有立法和程序。”
The Attorney General Suella Braverman told ITV's Peston show "every options is on the table" when asked about pulling out of the ECHR on Wednesday, adding that the government was "not ruling anything out".
总检察长苏拉·布雷弗曼周三在ITV的《Peston》节目上被问及退出欧洲人权法院时表示，“所有的选项都在桌面上”，并补充说政府“不排除任何可能性”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
总检察长苏拉·布雷弗曼周三在ITV的《Peston》节目上被问及退出欧洲人权法院时表示，“所有的选项都在桌面上”，并补充说政府“不排除任何可能性”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
"There is huge concern about what has happened... nothing is ruled out".
“人们对发生的事情非常担忧……不排除任何可能性。”
“人们对发生的事情非常担忧……不排除任何可能性。”
The ECHR - which is not a European unx body - is part of the Council of Europe, which still has the UK as a member.
欧洲人权法院不是欧盟机构，而是欧洲委员会的一部分，英国仍然是该委员会的成员。
欧洲人权法院不是欧盟机构，而是欧洲委员会的一部分，英国仍然是该委员会的成员。
Why were the asylum seekers granted stay in the UK on Tuesday
为什么周二这些寻求庇护者被允许继续留在英国
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
为什么周二这些寻求庇护者被允许继续留在英国
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The ECHR granted injunctions for three of the migrants and the remaining four migrants were removed from the flight after being granted injunctions by UK courts or on modern slavery grounds.
欧洲人权法院对其中三名移民发布了禁制令，而其余四名移民在英国法院或以现代奴隶制为由颁发禁制令后被带离航班。（译注：7个人中，4个是英国法院自己判决暂停遣送的，但另外3个是被欧洲人权法院叫停的，引起了英国的不满）
欧洲人权法院对其中三名移民发布了禁制令，而其余四名移民在英国法院或以现代奴隶制为由颁发禁制令后被带离航班。（译注：7个人中，4个是英国法院自己判决暂停遣送的，但另外3个是被欧洲人权法院叫停的，引起了英国的不满）
Court of Appeal judges granted the injunctions - temporarily preventing the removal of the men - to three asylum seekers whose challenges were dismissed at the High Court on Tuesday.
上诉法院的法官向三名寻求庇护者颁发了禁制令（暂时阻止了这几名男子的遣送）。此前这三名寻求庇护者的上诉周二在英国高等法院被驳回。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
上诉法院的法官向三名寻求庇护者颁发了禁制令（暂时阻止了这几名男子的遣送）。此前这三名寻求庇护者的上诉周二在英国高等法院被驳回。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
On Wednesday afternoon, the court confirmed that three judges held an urgent hearing at 9.50pm yesterday – just 40 minutes before the flight was due to take off from Wiltshire.
周三下午，法院证实，三名法官在昨天晚上9点50分举行了紧急听证会，此时距离飞机从威尔特郡起飞只有40分钟。
周三下午，法院证实，三名法官在昨天晚上9点50分举行了紧急听证会，此时距离飞机从威尔特郡起飞只有40分钟。
Maha Sardar, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers, was one of the legal team who represented the asylum seekers due to be removed on the flight.
Garden Court Chambers的大律师玛哈·萨达尔是为那些将在航班上被带走的寻求庇护者的律师团队成员之一。
Garden Court Chambers的大律师玛哈·萨达尔是为那些将在航班上被带走的寻求庇护者的律师团队成员之一。
She told ITV News: "The prospect of being forcibly removed to a country which is alien to you and to which you have no connection is extremely traumatic.
她告诉ITV新闻频道说：“被强制转移到一个对你来说陌生、与你毫无联系的国家的前景是非常痛苦的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
她告诉ITV新闻频道说：“被强制转移到一个对你来说陌生、与你毫无联系的国家的前景是非常痛苦的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
"There was a huge collective sigh of relief in the courtroom when the flight to Rwanda had been cancelled. As lawyers understandably we have serious concerns for our clients’ physical and mental welfare, both en route, and when they arrive in Rwanda."
“当飞往卢旺达的航班取消时，法庭上大家都松了一口气。作为律师，我们非常担心我们的客户在途中以及抵达卢旺达时的身心健康，这是可以理解的。”
“当飞往卢旺达的航班取消时，法庭上大家都松了一口气。作为律师，我们非常担心我们的客户在途中以及抵达卢旺达时的身心健康，这是可以理解的。”
Ms Sardar said the Rwanda policy "fails to acknowledge the humanity and dignity of those who look to the UK for international protection."
萨达尔女士说，遣送卢旺达的政策“未能承认那些指望从英国寻求国际保护的人的人性和尊严。”
萨达尔女士说，遣送卢旺达的政策“未能承认那些指望从英国寻求国际保护的人的人性和尊严。”
"We want the UK government to support individuals and communities facing war and persecution unconditionally," she told ITV News.
“我们希望英国政府无条件地支持面对战争和迫害的个人和社区，”她告诉ITV新闻。
“我们希望英国政府无条件地支持面对战争和迫害的个人和社区，”她告诉ITV新闻。
"Their faith, ethnicity or nationality does not matter. What matters is that their basic humanity and dignity is being violated – the most fundamental of human values."
“他们的信仰、种族或国籍并不重要。重要的是，他们的基本人性和尊严遭到了侵犯，这是人类最基本的价值观。”
“他们的信仰、种族或国籍并不重要。重要的是，他们的基本人性和尊严遭到了侵犯，这是人类最基本的价值观。”
What legal implications does this have for the government's policy?
这对政府的政策有什么法律影响？
这对政府的政策有什么法律影响？
Those removed from the flight are being released from their immigration detention centres and will be fitted with electronic tags "while we continue to progress their relocation," Ms Patel said.
帕特尔表示，那些被带离航班的人将从移民拘留中心获释，并将被安装电子标签，“与此同时，我们将继续推进他们的安置工作。”
帕特尔表示，那些被带离航班的人将从移民拘留中心获释，并将被安装电子标签，“与此同时，我们将继续推进他们的安置工作。”
The Court of Appeal will hear applications for permission to appeal by the three men on June 28, with a full High Court review of the plan expected in July.
上诉法院将于6月28日审理这三名男子的上诉申请，预计高等法院将于7月对该计划进行全面审查。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
上诉法院将于6月28日审理这三名男子的上诉申请，预计高等法院将于7月对该计划进行全面审查。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Should the policy be found to be unlawful some people could be returned to the UK from Rwanda.
如果这项政策被发现是非法的，一些人可能会从卢旺达返回英国。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
如果这项政策被发现是非法的，一些人可能会从卢旺达返回英国。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Ms Patel told MPs in the Commons that an "out-of-hours" judge ruled against the deportation of the flight's last remaining passengers "minutes" before departure.
帕特尔女士告诉下议院的议员们，一名“工作时间之外”的法官在起飞前“几分钟”裁定，不允许遣送航班上最后剩余的乘客。
帕特尔女士告诉下议院的议员们，一名“工作时间之外”的法官在起飞前“几分钟”裁定，不允许遣送航班上最后剩余的乘客。
She said removal directions for people on the flight have been "paused", but added: "The European Court of Human Rights did not rule that the policy or relocations were unlawful, but they prohibited the removal of three of those on last night's flight.
她表示，机上人员的撤离指示已被“暂停”，但她补充说：“欧洲人权法院没有裁定该政策或重新安置是非法的，但他们禁止将昨晚航班上的3名乘客撤离。
她表示，机上人员的撤离指示已被“暂停”，但她补充说：“欧洲人权法院没有裁定该政策或重新安置是非法的，但他们禁止将昨晚航班上的3名乘客撤离。
"Those prohibitions last for different time periods but are not an absolute bar on their transfer to Rwanda. Anyone who has been ordered to be released by the courts will be tagged while we continue to progress their relocation."
“这些禁令持续不同时期，但并不是绝对禁止将他们转移到卢旺达。在我们继续推进他们的安置过程中，任何被法院下令释放的人都将被安装标签。”
“这些禁令持续不同时期，但并不是绝对禁止将他们转移到卢旺达。在我们继续推进他们的安置过程中，任何被法院下令释放的人都将被安装标签。”
Asked if a flight could go ahead before legal proceedings in the UK are complete, Number 10 said: "That is my understanding."
当被问及航班是否可以在英国的法律程序完成之前起飞时，唐宁街10号说：“我认为是这样。”
当被问及航班是否可以在英国的法律程序完成之前起飞时，唐宁街10号说：“我认为是这样。”
The home secretary commended the UK courts for being transparent with their decisions but accused the European court of being "opaque".
这位内政大臣称赞英国法院的裁决透明，但指责欧洲法院“不透明”。
这位内政大臣称赞英国法院的裁决透明，但指责欧洲法院“不透明”。
In its ruling, the ECHR acknowledged concerns about access to “fair and efficient procedures for the determination of refugee status” in Rwanda, the fact that the African nation is not part of the European human rights frxwork and the absence of “any legally enforceable mechanism” to return migrants to the UK if there is a successful legal challenge to the policy.
在其裁决中，欧洲人权法院认为，在卢旺达获得“公平和有效的难民地位确定程序”、这个非洲国家不属于欧洲人权框架的事实，以及如果对移民政策发起成功的法律挑战，则缺乏将移民遣返英国的“任何法律执行机制”，这些都是令人担忧的。
在其裁决中，欧洲人权法院认为，在卢旺达获得“公平和有效的难民地位确定程序”、这个非洲国家不属于欧洲人权框架的事实，以及如果对移民政策发起成功的法律挑战，则缺乏将移民遣返英国的“任何法律执行机制”，这些都是令人担忧的。
Ms Patel said she would not let the "usual suspects" or "mobs" - an apparent reference to lawyers and opposition MPs - prevent asylum seekers being sent to Rwanda.
帕特尔表示，她不会让“常见嫌疑人”或“暴徒”（显然指的是律师和反对派议员）阻止难民被送往卢旺达。
帕特尔表示，她不会让“常见嫌疑人”或“暴徒”（显然指的是律师和反对派议员）阻止难民被送往卢旺达。
She added: "We will not accept that we have no right to control our borders, we will do everything necessary to keep this country safe and we will continue our long and proud tradition of helping those in genuine need."
她补充说：“我们不会接受我们没有权利控制我们的边界的说法，我们将尽一切必要的努力来维护这个国家的安全，我们将继续我们‘帮助真正需要帮助的人’的悠久而自豪的传统。”
她补充说：“我们不会接受我们没有权利控制我们的边界的说法，我们将尽一切必要的努力来维护这个国家的安全，我们将继续我们‘帮助真正需要帮助的人’的悠久而自豪的传统。”
There have been calls from within the Tory party for the UK to leave the ECHR, which is not a European unx institution and Britain's membership was not affected by Brexit.
保守党内部一直有人呼吁英国退出欧洲人权法院，因为欧洲人权法院不是欧盟机构，所以英国的成员国身份没有受到英国脱欧的影响。
保守党内部一直有人呼吁英国退出欧洲人权法院，因为欧洲人权法院不是欧盟机构，所以英国的成员国身份没有受到英国脱欧的影响。
Will the UK leave the European Convention on Human Rights?
英国会退出欧洲人权法院吗？
英国会退出欧洲人权法院吗？
“Our legal team are reviewing every decision made on this flight and preparation for the next flight begins now," she said.
她说：“我们的法律团队正在审查这趟航班的每一个决定，并且现在已经开始为下一趟航班做准备。”
她说：“我们的法律团队正在审查这趟航班的每一个决定，并且现在已经开始为下一趟航班做准备。”
She described the ECHR's intervention as “very surprising”, adding that “many of those removed from this flight will be placed on the next”.
她形容欧洲人权法院的干预“非常令人惊讶”，并补充说：“许多从这趟航班上被带走的人将被安置在下一趟航班上”。
她形容欧洲人权法院的干预“非常令人惊讶”，并补充说：“许多从这趟航班上被带走的人将被安置在下一趟航班上”。
On Tuesday Prime Minister Johnson suggested he could pull the UK out of the European Convention on Human Rights in order to force through deportations and on Wednesday his spokesman did not rule it out.
周二，约翰逊首相暗示，他可以让英国退出欧洲人权法院，以便强制遣送难民。周三，他的发言人没有排除这种可能性。
周二，约翰逊首相暗示，他可以让英国退出欧洲人权法院，以便强制遣送难民。周三，他的发言人没有排除这种可能性。
Number 10 said "all options are on the table...we will look at the role of the ECHR", when asked about the possibility of leaving it.
当被问及退出该机构的可能性时，唐宁街10号说：“所有的选择都在桌面上……我们将研究欧洲人权法院的作用”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
当被问及退出该机构的可能性时，唐宁街10号说：“所有的选择都在桌面上……我们将研究欧洲人权法院的作用”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The PM said: "Will it be necessary to change some laws to help us as we go along? It may very well be and all these options are under constant review."
首相说：“有必要改变一些法律来帮助我们吗？很可能是这样，所有这些选项都在不断审查中。”
首相说：“有必要改变一些法律来帮助我们吗？很可能是这样，所有这些选项都在不断审查中。”
That suggestions sparked fury on social media, with people on Twitter calling it "disgraceful" and "disgusting".
这一暗示在社交媒体上引发了愤怒，推特上的人们称其“可耻”和“恶心”。
这一暗示在社交媒体上引发了愤怒，推特上的人们称其“可耻”和“恶心”。
But Health Secretary Sajid Javid did not rule out when asked on Wednesday whether it was something the UK was considering.
但卫生大臣萨吉德·贾维德在周三被问及英国是否正在考虑此事时，并未排除这种可能性。
但卫生大臣萨吉德·贾维德在周三被问及英国是否正在考虑此事时，并未排除这种可能性。
He said leaving the ECHR is "of course not" the only solution to legal decisions against the deportations but dodged the question when pressed for a direct response.
他说，退出欧洲人权法院“当然不是”针对遣送法律决定的唯一解决方案，但在被要求做出直接回应时，他回避了这个问题。
他说，退出欧洲人权法院“当然不是”针对遣送法律决定的唯一解决方案，但在被要求做出直接回应时，他回避了这个问题。
Instead he said the UK was determined to continue with the policy and is prepared to fight the decisions in the courts.
相反，他表示，英国决心继续推行这一政策，并准备在法庭上与这些决定抗争。
相反，他表示，英国决心继续推行这一政策，并准备在法庭上与这些决定抗争。
评论翻译
evenstevens280Gloucestershire
Why is our government trying so hard to be the bad guys? I don't understand what they're gaining from this
为什么我们的政府如此努力地扮演坏人？我不明白他们从中得到了什么
Why is our government trying so hard to be the bad guys? I don't understand what they're gaining from this
为什么我们的政府如此努力地扮演坏人？我不明白他们从中得到了什么
barryvmEuropean unx
Power.
What happens if you put utterly self-serving people in a position of authority? They use it to further their own interests. They got into power on the back of a radical populist movement operating (as they all do) on the premise that nothing must stand in the way of "the will of the people" (as defined by them, of course). Not institutions. Not the rule of law. No procedure. No treaty. No moral or ethical principle. Definitely not its political opponents, who are not speaking for "the people" and are therefore illegitimate. This dynamic, and the implied rejection of the rule of law and political pluralism explains why radical populist movements and the governments they bring about almost always go on to attack democratic institutions (of which human rights are an integral part).
What you see now is an attempt to repeat the process: take a divisive policy (the Rwanda deportations) and use that division to rally round your supporters against the chosen enemy. In this case, the enemy will be immigrants, human rights and any institution or person that defends them because they think the people who vote for them generally dislike immigration. Whether the target audience is radical MP's in their own party who want the ECHR gone or voters who want immigrants out, the principle is always the same: radicalize and mobilize your supporters behind you to gain political power (or in this case: hang on to it a little longer). The fact that removing the ECHR would remove yet another restraint on the UK executive is an added bonus.
The decision to pick another fight with the EU is another, parallel, attempt at doing the same thing.
Divide and rule, essentially. The only factor that matters when sexting the wedge issue is that it must unite their supporters. Nothing else, neither the consequences or the ethical implications, ultimately matters. After all: they're not there to govern the country for the benefit of its population. They're there for the status, wealth and attention they derive from it.
得到了权力。
如果你把完全自私自利的人置于权威的位置会发生什么？他们会利用它来增进自己的利益。他们依靠激进的民粹主义运动（他们都是这样做的）掌权，其前提是任何事情都不能阻碍“人民的意志”（当然，这是他们自己来定义的）。没有机构，没有法治，没有过程，没有条约，没有道德或伦理原则。绝对不是它的政治对手——他们不为“人民”说话，因此是非法的。这种动态，以及对法治和政治多元主义隐含的拒绝，解释了为什么激进的民粹主义运动及其产生的政府几乎总是继续攻击民主制度（人权是其中的一个组成部分）。
你现在看到的是企图重复这一过程：采取分裂政策（遣送卢旺达），利用这种分裂来团结你的支持者，反对你所选择的敌人。在这个案例下，敌人将是移民、人权和任何捍卫它们的机构或个人，因为他们认为投票给他们的人通常不喜欢移民。无论目标受众是自己党内希望退出欧洲人权法院的激进议员，还是希望拒绝移民的选民，原则都是一样的：让你背后的支持者变得激进并动员起来，以获得政治权力（或者在这种情况下：呆在台上的时间更长一些）。退出欧洲人权法院将会取消对英国高官的另一项限制，这是一个额外的好处。
决定挑起与欧盟的另一场战争，也是在做同样的事情。
本质上：分而治之。在选择分裂议题时，唯一重要的因素是它必须团结他们的支持者。其他任何事情，无论是后果还是伦理意义，最终都不重要。毕竟：他们不是为了人民的利益而治理国家。他们在台上是为了获得地位、财富和关注。
Power.
What happens if you put utterly self-serving people in a position of authority? They use it to further their own interests. They got into power on the back of a radical populist movement operating (as they all do) on the premise that nothing must stand in the way of "the will of the people" (as defined by them, of course). Not institutions. Not the rule of law. No procedure. No treaty. No moral or ethical principle. Definitely not its political opponents, who are not speaking for "the people" and are therefore illegitimate. This dynamic, and the implied rejection of the rule of law and political pluralism explains why radical populist movements and the governments they bring about almost always go on to attack democratic institutions (of which human rights are an integral part).
What you see now is an attempt to repeat the process: take a divisive policy (the Rwanda deportations) and use that division to rally round your supporters against the chosen enemy. In this case, the enemy will be immigrants, human rights and any institution or person that defends them because they think the people who vote for them generally dislike immigration. Whether the target audience is radical MP's in their own party who want the ECHR gone or voters who want immigrants out, the principle is always the same: radicalize and mobilize your supporters behind you to gain political power (or in this case: hang on to it a little longer). The fact that removing the ECHR would remove yet another restraint on the UK executive is an added bonus.
The decision to pick another fight with the EU is another, parallel, attempt at doing the same thing.
Divide and rule, essentially. The only factor that matters when sexting the wedge issue is that it must unite their supporters. Nothing else, neither the consequences or the ethical implications, ultimately matters. After all: they're not there to govern the country for the benefit of its population. They're there for the status, wealth and attention they derive from it.
得到了权力。
如果你把完全自私自利的人置于权威的位置会发生什么？他们会利用它来增进自己的利益。他们依靠激进的民粹主义运动（他们都是这样做的）掌权，其前提是任何事情都不能阻碍“人民的意志”（当然，这是他们自己来定义的）。没有机构，没有法治，没有过程，没有条约，没有道德或伦理原则。绝对不是它的政治对手——他们不为“人民”说话，因此是非法的。这种动态，以及对法治和政治多元主义隐含的拒绝，解释了为什么激进的民粹主义运动及其产生的政府几乎总是继续攻击民主制度（人权是其中的一个组成部分）。
你现在看到的是企图重复这一过程：采取分裂政策（遣送卢旺达），利用这种分裂来团结你的支持者，反对你所选择的敌人。在这个案例下，敌人将是移民、人权和任何捍卫它们的机构或个人，因为他们认为投票给他们的人通常不喜欢移民。无论目标受众是自己党内希望退出欧洲人权法院的激进议员，还是希望拒绝移民的选民，原则都是一样的：让你背后的支持者变得激进并动员起来，以获得政治权力（或者在这种情况下：呆在台上的时间更长一些）。退出欧洲人权法院将会取消对英国高官的另一项限制，这是一个额外的好处。
决定挑起与欧盟的另一场战争，也是在做同样的事情。
本质上：分而治之。在选择分裂议题时，唯一重要的因素是它必须团结他们的支持者。其他任何事情，无论是后果还是伦理意义，最终都不重要。毕竟：他们不是为了人民的利益而治理国家。他们在台上是为了获得地位、财富和关注。
BatHunterofDevon
The ‘human rights convention’ is massively skewed in favour of the pro-immigration lobby. What about the ‘human rights’ of the British people to live in their own country and have it not ruined by criminals who have no respect for our culture and don’t even speak our language?
A nation that allows everyone to be a citizen is nothing more than a landmass. The idiots who are lobbying for mass immigration are really just asking for more crime, social disunity, and chaos. They do not have our best interests at heart. Britain is for Brits. Not for these so-called ‘refugees’-who by the way come mainly from France-which is NOT a country that is at war. Only people with actual documentation and genuine refugee status should come here-and that is on the proviso that they return to their country once the situation is calmed down.
I do not want more homeless people on the streets hassling me for money. I don’t want more rapists, child molesters and terrorists here, thank you very much. Send them back. They contribute nothing to this country. We have enough of a housing shortage and enough crime as it is, let’s not make the situation worse okay.
“人权公约”严重偏向于支持移民的游说团体。那英国人民生活在自己国家的“人权”怎么办？他们的国家不会被那些不尊重我们文化、甚至不会说我们语言的罪犯们给毁掉吗？
一个允许每个人都成为公民的国家，只能算是一块“大陆”。那些游说大规模移民的白痴实际上只是在要求更多的犯罪、社会分裂和混乱。他们并没有把我们的最大利益放在心上。英国是属于英国人的。对这些所谓的“难民”来说不是这样的，他们主要来自法国，而法国并不是一个处于战争状态的国家。只有拥有实际证件和真正难民身份的人才应该来到这里，但条件是一旦局势稳定，他们必须返回自己的国家。
我不希望街上有更多无家可归的人缠着我要钱。我不希望这里有更多的强奸犯、猥亵儿童者和恐怖分子，就是这样。送他们回去。他们对这个国家没有贡献。我们的住房短缺和犯罪已经够多了，我们不要让情况变得更糟了，好吗？
The ‘human rights convention’ is massively skewed in favour of the pro-immigration lobby. What about the ‘human rights’ of the British people to live in their own country and have it not ruined by criminals who have no respect for our culture and don’t even speak our language?
A nation that allows everyone to be a citizen is nothing more than a landmass. The idiots who are lobbying for mass immigration are really just asking for more crime, social disunity, and chaos. They do not have our best interests at heart. Britain is for Brits. Not for these so-called ‘refugees’-who by the way come mainly from France-which is NOT a country that is at war. Only people with actual documentation and genuine refugee status should come here-and that is on the proviso that they return to their country once the situation is calmed down.
I do not want more homeless people on the streets hassling me for money. I don’t want more rapists, child molesters and terrorists here, thank you very much. Send them back. They contribute nothing to this country. We have enough of a housing shortage and enough crime as it is, let’s not make the situation worse okay.
“人权公约”严重偏向于支持移民的游说团体。那英国人民生活在自己国家的“人权”怎么办？他们的国家不会被那些不尊重我们文化、甚至不会说我们语言的罪犯们给毁掉吗？
一个允许每个人都成为公民的国家，只能算是一块“大陆”。那些游说大规模移民的白痴实际上只是在要求更多的犯罪、社会分裂和混乱。他们并没有把我们的最大利益放在心上。英国是属于英国人的。对这些所谓的“难民”来说不是这样的，他们主要来自法国，而法国并不是一个处于战争状态的国家。只有拥有实际证件和真正难民身份的人才应该来到这里，但条件是一旦局势稳定，他们必须返回自己的国家。
我不希望街上有更多无家可归的人缠着我要钱。我不希望这里有更多的强奸犯、猥亵儿童者和恐怖分子，就是这样。送他们回去。他们对这个国家没有贡献。我们的住房短缺和犯罪已经够多了，我们不要让情况变得更糟了，好吗？
BassplayerDad
It is actually the safe countries that migrants travel through to attempt to reach the UK is the real issue.
Whether we should take a quota as part of some joined up thinking is a different issue.
The problem also is the legal aid firms that abuse this legislation.
All legal immigration welcome but you can't just turn up without a valid claim, expect to stay at UK expense and get free legal representation. Oh no wait....
实际上，移民试图前往英国所穿越的那些安全的国家才是真正的问题。
我们是否应该把配额作为一些联合思考的一部分是另一个问题。
问题还在于法律援助公司滥用这一立法。
欢迎所有合法的移民，但你不能没有有效的申请就直接出现在这里，还指望获得留在英国的费用和免费的法律援助。哦，不，等一下……
It is actually the safe countries that migrants travel through to attempt to reach the UK is the real issue.
Whether we should take a quota as part of some joined up thinking is a different issue.
The problem also is the legal aid firms that abuse this legislation.
All legal immigration welcome but you can't just turn up without a valid claim, expect to stay at UK expense and get free legal representation. Oh no wait....
实际上，移民试图前往英国所穿越的那些安全的国家才是真正的问题。
我们是否应该把配额作为一些联合思考的一部分是另一个问题。
问题还在于法律援助公司滥用这一立法。
欢迎所有合法的移民，但你不能没有有效的申请就直接出现在这里，还指望获得留在英国的费用和免费的法律援助。哦，不，等一下……
The_Mercian
This is exactly what the racist old dinosaurs have voted for. They want to drag England back to the Victorian error. I look forward to the government introducing child labour to increase efficiency.
Every Tory should be absolutely ashamed. This country has had its heart ripped out in just 12 years based on a broken ideology which needs to constantly degrade democracy to continue to rule. Racist fascists are very much in charge of the country and at least 10 million people will vote for them in the next election.
这正是种族主义的老恐龙们所支持的。他们想把英国拖回维多利亚时代的错误。我预计政府还会引入童工来提高效率。
每个保守党人都应该感到羞愧。在仅仅12年的时间里，这个国家的心被掏空了，因为它的意识形态已经破碎，需要不断削弱民主才能继续统治。种族主义法西斯在很大程度上掌控着这个国家，至少有1000万人会在下次选举中投票给他们。
This is exactly what the racist old dinosaurs have voted for. They want to drag England back to the Victorian error. I look forward to the government introducing child labour to increase efficiency.
Every Tory should be absolutely ashamed. This country has had its heart ripped out in just 12 years based on a broken ideology which needs to constantly degrade democracy to continue to rule. Racist fascists are very much in charge of the country and at least 10 million people will vote for them in the next election.
这正是种族主义的老恐龙们所支持的。他们想把英国拖回维多利亚时代的错误。我预计政府还会引入童工来提高效率。
每个保守党人都应该感到羞愧。在仅仅12年的时间里，这个国家的心被掏空了，因为它的意识形态已经破碎，需要不断削弱民主才能继续统治。种族主义法西斯在很大程度上掌控着这个国家，至少有1000万人会在下次选举中投票给他们。
Fluffy-Composer-2619
Even after whittling the list of deportees from 106 down to 31 and eventually 7, one of those remaining was a former Iranian police officer who was tortured for refusing to open fire on peaceful protesters.
We literally handed over $160 million in advance to the Rwandan government for them to take people who want to work in our country, to work in their country instead. Not only is it a backwards policy supposedly designed to counter human trafficking, it is a human trafficking policy in reverse. We are paying a foreign government to forcibly place people in work, where they will have no say in where they work or how much they get paid.
即使将被遣送者的名单从106人减少到31人，最后减少到7人（其中仍有一名因拒绝向和平抗议者开枪而受到酷刑而逃往英国的前伊朗警察）。
我们真的提前给了卢旺达政府一亿六千万美元，让他们把想在我们国家工作的人带到他们的国家去工作。这不仅是一项旨在打击人口贩卖的反向政策，而且是一项反向的人口贩卖政策。我们付钱给外国政府强迫人们工作，在那里他们对在哪里工作或拿多少钱没有任何发言权。
Even after whittling the list of deportees from 106 down to 31 and eventually 7, one of those remaining was a former Iranian police officer who was tortured for refusing to open fire on peaceful protesters.
We literally handed over $160 million in advance to the Rwandan government for them to take people who want to work in our country, to work in their country instead. Not only is it a backwards policy supposedly designed to counter human trafficking, it is a human trafficking policy in reverse. We are paying a foreign government to forcibly place people in work, where they will have no say in where they work or how much they get paid.
即使将被遣送者的名单从106人减少到31人，最后减少到7人（其中仍有一名因拒绝向和平抗议者开枪而受到酷刑而逃往英国的前伊朗警察）。
我们真的提前给了卢旺达政府一亿六千万美元，让他们把想在我们国家工作的人带到他们的国家去工作。这不仅是一项旨在打击人口贩卖的反向政策，而且是一项反向的人口贩卖政策。我们付钱给外国政府强迫人们工作，在那里他们对在哪里工作或拿多少钱没有任何发言权。
Eidolon-Dan
what a fucking state our country is in, i doubt there is anyone alive in the UK today that has been around when we have had such a shower of self serving cunts in government.
我们的国家现在是一个多么该死的国家，当我们的政府里有这么多自私自利的biao子时，我怀疑今天在英国还有人活着。
what a fucking state our country is in, i doubt there is anyone alive in the UK today that has been around when we have had such a shower of self serving cunts in government.
我们的国家现在是一个多么该死的国家，当我们的政府里有这么多自私自利的biao子时，我怀疑今天在英国还有人活着。
Jensablefur
Its unironically the most right wing government in history.
Fucking Nick Griffin and Nigel Farage could be sat in the cabinet right now and it wouldn't make a difference.
毫无疑问，这是历史上最右翼的政府。
该死的尼克·格里芬和奈杰尔·法拉奇现在就算在内阁也不会有什么区别。
Its unironically the most right wing government in history.
Fucking Nick Griffin and Nigel Farage could be sat in the cabinet right now and it wouldn't make a difference.
毫无疑问，这是历史上最右翼的政府。
该死的尼克·格里芬和奈杰尔·法拉奇现在就算在内阁也不会有什么区别。
je97
Can this collection of useless, self-serving cunts be deported instead please? Preferably to a country with a population that won't let them get into power to continue their bullshit.
能不能把这些没用的，自私自利的biao子们驱逐出境？最好是去一个人民不让他们掌权的国家继续他们的扯淡。
Can this collection of useless, self-serving cunts be deported instead please? Preferably to a country with a population that won't let them get into power to continue their bullshit.
能不能把这些没用的，自私自利的biao子们驱逐出境？最好是去一个人民不让他们掌权的国家继续他们的扯淡。
DialZforZebra
Tories don't really care about human rights. Never have
保守党并不真正关心人权。从来就不关心
Tories don't really care about human rights. Never have
保守党并不真正关心人权。从来就不关心
rdu3y6
We're facing the worst cost of living crisis in decades and are on the brink of a recession, having never really recovered from the previous one. Yet the government's priority is laying on flights to send a handful of asylum seekers to an authoritarian dictatorship and starting an ideological trade war with our biggest trade partner.
我们正面临着几十年来最严重的生活成本危机，处于衰退的边缘，并且从未真正从上一次危机中恢复过来。然而政府的首要任务是安排航班将少数寻求庇护者送往一个威权独裁国家，并与我们最大的贸易伙伴展开打一场意识形态的贸易战。
We're facing the worst cost of living crisis in decades and are on the brink of a recession, having never really recovered from the previous one. Yet the government's priority is laying on flights to send a handful of asylum seekers to an authoritarian dictatorship and starting an ideological trade war with our biggest trade partner.
我们正面临着几十年来最严重的生活成本危机，处于衰退的边缘，并且从未真正从上一次危机中恢复过来。然而政府的首要任务是安排航班将少数寻求庇护者送往一个威权独裁国家，并与我们最大的贸易伙伴展开打一场意识形态的贸易战。
Good-Truck5702
Good to hear, if you want to enter the country do it legally, otherwise stay where you are.
很高兴听到这个消息，如果你想进入这个国家，请合法入境，否则就别来。
Good to hear, if you want to enter the country do it legally, otherwise stay where you are.
很高兴听到这个消息，如果你想进入这个国家，请合法入境，否则就别来。
sharktoothmaniac
And you have missed the entire point of the ECHR. Its literally your human rights. If they get rid of them the police can come to your house in the middle of the night, charge you for a made up crime, not allow you a trial and send you off to Rwanda.
This isn't just about refugees anymore, it's a cover up for something THAT sinister. They won't care if you're British, don't agree with the government? Deportation.
你完全忽略了欧洲人权法院的要点。这其实是你的人权。如果他们摆脱了人权公约，那么警察可以在半夜来到你的家里，拿捏造的罪行指控你，不允许你接受审判，直接把你送到卢旺达。
这已经不仅仅是难民的问题了，这是为了掩盖一些邪恶的事情。他们不会在乎你是不是英国人——不赞同政府？那就驱逐出境。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
And you have missed the entire point of the ECHR. Its literally your human rights. If they get rid of them the police can come to your house in the middle of the night, charge you for a made up crime, not allow you a trial and send you off to Rwanda.
This isn't just about refugees anymore, it's a cover up for something THAT sinister. They won't care if you're British, don't agree with the government? Deportation.
你完全忽略了欧洲人权法院的要点。这其实是你的人权。如果他们摆脱了人权公约，那么警察可以在半夜来到你的家里，拿捏造的罪行指控你，不允许你接受审判，直接把你送到卢旺达。
这已经不仅仅是难民的问题了，这是为了掩盖一些邪恶的事情。他们不会在乎你是不是英国人——不赞同政府？那就驱逐出境。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Vethae
Setting aside the human rights convention, for a moment.
Maybe I'm missing something with this Rwanda plan. Can someone please clarify exactly what is unethical about this? These migrants are looking for a peaceful country which will accept them and allow them to make new lives for themselves. Rwanda is offering that.
Seems to me that the only criticism is that Rwanda is relatively poor. But that should only matter to an economic migrant, not a refugee.
暂且不谈人权公约。
也许我在卢旺达的计划中遗漏了什么。有人能确切地说明一下这有什么不道德的吗？这些移民正在寻找一个能够接受他们并允许他们开始新生活的和平国家。卢旺达正在提供这样的机会啊。
在我看来，唯一的批评是卢旺达相对贫穷。但这应该只对经济移民有影响，而不是难民。
Setting aside the human rights convention, for a moment.
Maybe I'm missing something with this Rwanda plan. Can someone please clarify exactly what is unethical about this? These migrants are looking for a peaceful country which will accept them and allow them to make new lives for themselves. Rwanda is offering that.
Seems to me that the only criticism is that Rwanda is relatively poor. But that should only matter to an economic migrant, not a refugee.
暂且不谈人权公约。
也许我在卢旺达的计划中遗漏了什么。有人能确切地说明一下这有什么不道德的吗？这些移民正在寻找一个能够接受他们并允许他们开始新生活的和平国家。卢旺达正在提供这样的机会啊。
在我看来，唯一的批评是卢旺达相对贫穷。但这应该只对经济移民有影响，而不是难民。
Vethae
I wonder how Rwandans feel about all these Brits talking about their country like living there is an inhumane punishment.
我想知道卢旺达人对这些英国人谈论说生活在他们的国家是“不人道的惩罚”是什么感觉。
I wonder how Rwandans feel about all these Brits talking about their country like living there is an inhumane punishment.
我想知道卢旺达人对这些英国人谈论说生活在他们的国家是“不人道的惩罚”是什么感觉。
mikeydamager
I suppose human rights are only inalienable until the government decides they aren't any more. The UK is a joke
我以为人权是不可剥夺的，直到政府决定它们不再如此。英国就是个笑话
I suppose human rights are only inalienable until the government decides they aren't any more. The UK is a joke
我以为人权是不可剥夺的，直到政府决定它们不再如此。英国就是个笑话
aspietrekkie
This country is going backwards
这个国家正在倒退
This country is going backwards
这个国家正在倒退
很赞 0
收藏