阿尔忒弥斯计划的失败让中国在太空竞赛中取得领先
正文翻译
美国新一代登月火箭SLS在39B发射台坚持了一个半月之后，终于装不下去了，9月26日，NASA以躲避台风为理由，灰溜溜地将首发箭拖回VBA，也就是肯尼迪航天中心3号总装大楼。虽然NASA依然嘴硬，说不早于11月份，SLS首发箭还会回到发射台，并打开下一个发射窗口。不过，外界普遍预计，今年内是不可能再折腾了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
美国新一代登月火箭SLS在39B发射台坚持了一个半月之后，终于装不下去了，9月26日，NASA以躲避台风为理由，灰溜溜地将首发箭拖回VBA，也就是肯尼迪航天中心3号总装大楼。虽然NASA依然嘴硬，说不早于11月份，SLS首发箭还会回到发射台，并打开下一个发射窗口。不过，外界普遍预计，今年内是不可能再折腾了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
评论翻译
Tau Shet Yoi
China doesn't have the intention to race with America in space technology, China just follows its own steps to develop its space exploration.
中国根本无意在太空技术领域上与美国展开竞争，中国只是在按照自己的步伐开展太空探索任务。
China doesn't have the intention to race with America in space technology, China just follows its own steps to develop its space exploration.
中国根本无意在太空技术领域上与美国展开竞争，中国只是在按照自己的步伐开展太空探索任务。
Power Rising
As a Chinese I really can't understand why the US care about China's space development since they have landed on the moon sixty years ago...
作为一个中国人，我实在不明白为什么美国要那么关心中国的太空发展，他们不是早在60年前就已经登陆月球了吗....
As a Chinese I really can't understand why the US care about China's space development since they have landed on the moon sixty years ago...
作为一个中国人，我实在不明白为什么美国要那么关心中国的太空发展，他们不是早在60年前就已经登陆月球了吗....
Maxxxie Lorenzo
or maybe they didn't? lol
也许他们并没有？哈哈
or maybe they didn't? lol
也许他们并没有？哈哈
IB Daramy
As an Electrical Engineer and Computer Science professional educated in England and America, what saddens me about the United States is the dismal state of Science Education and the gutting out of the country's manufacturing base. The deficiency in Science education in the United States was exposed by a report to President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. And in the 40 years since, it has gotten worse. Now we are in 2022, go figure.
作为一个在英国和美国接受教育的电气工程师和计算机科学专业人士，最让我感到悲哀的是美国科学教育的惨淡现状和该国制造业的流失。早在20世纪80年代，一份被提交给里根总统的报告就已经暴露过美国科学教育的不足。自那之后又过去了40年，情况反而变得更加糟糕了。如今我们已经身处2022年了，好好想想吧。
As an Electrical Engineer and Computer Science professional educated in England and America, what saddens me about the United States is the dismal state of Science Education and the gutting out of the country's manufacturing base. The deficiency in Science education in the United States was exposed by a report to President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. And in the 40 years since, it has gotten worse. Now we are in 2022, go figure.
作为一个在英国和美国接受教育的电气工程师和计算机科学专业人士，最让我感到悲哀的是美国科学教育的惨淡现状和该国制造业的流失。早在20世纪80年代，一份被提交给里根总统的报告就已经暴露过美国科学教育的不足。自那之后又过去了40年，情况反而变得更加糟糕了。如今我们已经身处2022年了，好好想想吧。
394pjo
From Bloomberg: 'The top three largest employers in China are the oil and gas industry, the aerospace industry and the Mining industry. The top three largest employers in the United States are Walmart, Amazon and Home Depot'
据彭博社报道：中国的前三大雇主分别是石油和天然气行业、航空航天行业以及采矿业。而美国的前三大雇主则是沃尔玛，亚马逊以及家得宝。
From Bloomberg: 'The top three largest employers in China are the oil and gas industry, the aerospace industry and the Mining industry. The top three largest employers in the United States are Walmart, Amazon and Home Depot'
据彭博社报道：中国的前三大雇主分别是石油和天然气行业、航空航天行业以及采矿业。而美国的前三大雇主则是沃尔玛，亚马逊以及家得宝。
Alvin Ma
Americans are too noisy repeating constantly declaring "a new moon race is starting and China won't be able to win". On the other hand the Chinese side rarely says anything about their missions racing with others. They're just quietly doing something that afterwards turns out to be astonishing. They believe saying less but doing more is a virtue. I wonder if this is due to a culture difference.
美国人实在太喧闹了，他们一刻不停地宣称“一场新的月球竞赛已经开始了，而且这是一场中国无法取胜的竞赛”。而在另一方面，中国则很少提及自己的太空探索任务，亦或者是与其他国家作比较。他们只是在静静地做着那些事后被世人证明是惊人之举的事情。他们相信少说多做是一种美德。我很好奇，这种区别是不是由文化差异所造成的。
Americans are too noisy repeating constantly declaring "a new moon race is starting and China won't be able to win". On the other hand the Chinese side rarely says anything about their missions racing with others. They're just quietly doing something that afterwards turns out to be astonishing. They believe saying less but doing more is a virtue. I wonder if this is due to a culture difference.
美国人实在太喧闹了，他们一刻不停地宣称“一场新的月球竞赛已经开始了，而且这是一场中国无法取胜的竞赛”。而在另一方面，中国则很少提及自己的太空探索任务，亦或者是与其他国家作比较。他们只是在静静地做着那些事后被世人证明是惊人之举的事情。他们相信少说多做是一种美德。我很好奇，这种区别是不是由文化差异所造成的。
ip desperado
let's be serious. long march-9 as an official project has not be approved yet.
我们认真一些吧，长征九号作为一个正式项目还没有获批呢。
let's be serious. long march-9 as an official project has not be approved yet.
我们认真一些吧，长征九号作为一个正式项目还没有获批呢。
Mole Js
China looking forward for the contribution to mankind ....a great country should be
中国致力于为全人类作出贡献，这才是一个伟大的国家该有的样子。
China looking forward for the contribution to mankind ....a great country should be
中国致力于为全人类作出贡献，这才是一个伟大的国家该有的样子。
MetaView7
What space race? They couldn't even get the rocket off the ground. How could this be a race?
啥太空竞赛啊？美国人甚至无法让自己的火箭离地。这算哪门子竞赛？
What space race? They couldn't even get the rocket off the ground. How could this be a race?
啥太空竞赛啊？美国人甚至无法让自己的火箭离地。这算哪门子竞赛？
John Drumpf
Well, for one, the SLS rocket actually exists. It's sitting on the launch pad. Long March 9 at this point is a fantasy. They haven't even built a full scale prototype yet.
好吧，首先SLS火箭是真实存在的东西，它已经被安置在发射台上了。而长征九号火箭到目前为止还只不过是一个幻想而已。他们甚至还没有造出一个全尺寸模型呢。
Well, for one, the SLS rocket actually exists. It's sitting on the launch pad. Long March 9 at this point is a fantasy. They haven't even built a full scale prototype yet.
好吧，首先SLS火箭是真实存在的东西，它已经被安置在发射台上了。而长征九号火箭到目前为止还只不过是一个幻想而已。他们甚至还没有造出一个全尺寸模型呢。
Willy Wonka
It's not that hard to beat China in the space race. They tell you exactly when they are going to do what? America just need look at the plan and improve upon it by whatever lead time you want. Just stick with that plan and America win. No need to hit anyone on the knee cap on the way to the end of the race.
在太空竞赛中击败中国并不困难。中国人会确切地告诉你他们将在什么时做些什么。美国只需要去看看他们的计划表，然后依照他们的时间表来改进自己的计划就行了，这样一来美国就能赢。没有必要在跑向终点的路上撞到其他人的膝盖骨。
It's not that hard to beat China in the space race. They tell you exactly when they are going to do what? America just need look at the plan and improve upon it by whatever lead time you want. Just stick with that plan and America win. No need to hit anyone on the knee cap on the way to the end of the race.
在太空竞赛中击败中国并不困难。中国人会确切地告诉你他们将在什么时做些什么。美国只需要去看看他们的计划表，然后依照他们的时间表来改进自己的计划就行了，这样一来美国就能赢。没有必要在跑向终点的路上撞到其他人的膝盖骨。
TWLam
I believe Russia may not have the technological advancement and money for the lunar project. At the rate things are unfolding in Russia, it will be significantly weakened by still dominant from weapons point of view.
按照目前的事态发展来看，我觉得俄罗斯可能已经没有进行月球探索项目所需要的技术和资金了，它在武器制造领域的主导地位也将被大大削弱。
I believe Russia may not have the technological advancement and money for the lunar project. At the rate things are unfolding in Russia, it will be significantly weakened by still dominant from weapons point of view.
按照目前的事态发展来看，我觉得俄罗斯可能已经没有进行月球探索项目所需要的技术和资金了，它在武器制造领域的主导地位也将被大大削弱。
Ken Hughes
...And who said the Chinese can not make high quality products and who is having the last laugh now?
谁说中国人不能生产高质量产品？如今又是谁笑到了最后？
...And who said the Chinese can not make high quality products and who is having the last laugh now?
谁说中国人不能生产高质量产品？如今又是谁笑到了最后？
Brian Liew
US cannot make workable products let alone quality stuff.
美国连能够正常工作的产品都生产不出来，更别提高质量产品了。
US cannot make workable products let alone quality stuff.
美国连能够正常工作的产品都生产不出来，更别提高质量产品了。
Shuai Guo
Deep space exploration is for entire human being. It’s not a race. I sincerely hope we can make a breakthrough here.
深空探索是属于全人类的事业，这并不是一场竞赛。我真心希望我们能在这一领域取得突破。
Deep space exploration is for entire human being. It’s not a race. I sincerely hope we can make a breakthrough here.
深空探索是属于全人类的事业，这并不是一场竞赛。我真心希望我们能在这一领域取得突破。
zhli
Apollo mission had 6 manned missions, all 100% success.
阿波罗计划实现了六次载人登月，而且成功率是100%。
Apollo mission had 6 manned missions, all 100% success.
阿波罗计划实现了六次载人登月，而且成功率是100%。
In Lee
And why are we having problems just launching Artemis ?
那为什么我们现在连发射阿尔忒弥斯火箭都做不到了？
And why are we having problems just launching Artemis ?
那为什么我们现在连发射阿尔忒弥斯火箭都做不到了？
Jenny Ohara
Another reason why its very suspicious that we indeed land on the moon.
另一个让我们对“我们曾经登上月球”产生怀疑的理由。
Another reason why its very suspicious that we indeed land on the moon.
另一个让我们对“我们曾经登上月球”产生怀疑的理由。
Peter Chan
Ya that was more than 50 years ago all the expert may become very old or died While the younger generation????. Now CHINA rocket experts very young.
是啊，美国登月已经是50年前的事情了。当初所有的专家都可能很老或者已经去世了，而年代一代却？？？中国的火箭专家则非常年轻。
Ya that was more than 50 years ago all the expert may become very old or died While the younger generation????. Now CHINA rocket experts very young.
是啊，美国登月已经是50年前的事情了。当初所有的专家都可能很老或者已经去世了，而年代一代却？？？中国的火箭专家则非常年轻。
Haryanto Sastradipura
nobody cares about the past
没有人在乎过去。
nobody cares about the past
没有人在乎过去。
TNT_PKK
I'm not a conspiracist, some people said NASA never went to MOON
我不是一个阴谋论者，有些人说NASA从未登陆过月球。
I'm not a conspiracist, some people said NASA never went to MOON
我不是一个阴谋论者，有些人说NASA从未登陆过月球。
Will Eisinga
China is in many ways Forward. Rocket Science, Space Station, Solar Industry, Battery Industry, EV Cars Industry, AI Industry, Chip Industry, Steel Industry, Construction Roads Rail Bridges Hospitals, BRI, Domestic Products for all day use. Good Service, Friendly, Quality Products, I Support China. Thank you China. For Peace and Prosperity and Stability in the World.
中国在很多方面都领先美国。火箭科学，空间站，太阳能行业，电池产业，电动汽车产业，人工智能行业，芯片行业，钢铁行业，道路桥梁建设领域以及日用品生产等等。我支持中国，感谢你们为世界和平，繁荣与稳定作出的贡献。
China is in many ways Forward. Rocket Science, Space Station, Solar Industry, Battery Industry, EV Cars Industry, AI Industry, Chip Industry, Steel Industry, Construction Roads Rail Bridges Hospitals, BRI, Domestic Products for all day use. Good Service, Friendly, Quality Products, I Support China. Thank you China. For Peace and Prosperity and Stability in the World.
中国在很多方面都领先美国。火箭科学，空间站，太阳能行业，电池产业，电动汽车产业，人工智能行业，芯片行业，钢铁行业，道路桥梁建设领域以及日用品生产等等。我支持中国，感谢你们为世界和平，繁荣与稳定作出的贡献。
zhli
China will launch its first manned mission to the moon in 2030. At that time, it can easily says "this is the real first man on the moon; the one 60 years ago did not happen."
中国将于2030年首次进行载人登月任务。到了那时候，她可以轻而易举地说：这才是人类第一次登上月球，60年前的那一次是假的。
China will launch its first manned mission to the moon in 2030. At that time, it can easily says "this is the real first man on the moon; the one 60 years ago did not happen."
中国将于2030年首次进行载人登月任务。到了那时候，她可以轻而易举地说：这才是人类第一次登上月球，60年前的那一次是假的。
Lucas Dimoveo
China getting to the Moon and Mars would be good for humanity, in my view
在我看来，中国登陆月球和火星对人类而言是一件好事。
China getting to the Moon and Mars would be good for humanity, in my view
在我看来，中国登陆月球和火星对人类而言是一件好事。
Kai
Maybe Hollywood made it to the moon instead of nasa
也许登陆月球的是好莱坞，而非美国宇航局。
Maybe Hollywood made it to the moon instead of nasa
也许登陆月球的是好莱坞，而非美国宇航局。
humanity
Apollo never went to the moon.
阿波罗从未登陆月球。
Apollo never went to the moon.
阿波罗从未登陆月球。
Yoba Dahl
Maybe this is the reason why NASA want to rush for moon landing again. You know, if China landing on it first and found no foot prints no US flag... How embarrassing
也许这就是NASA着急想要再次登陆月球的原因。你们知道的，如果让中国先行登陆月球的话，他们便会发现那里根本没有脚印，也没有美国国旗...那可就尴尬了...
Maybe this is the reason why NASA want to rush for moon landing again. You know, if China landing on it first and found no foot prints no US flag... How embarrassing
也许这就是NASA着急想要再次登陆月球的原因。你们知道的，如果让中国先行登陆月球的话，他们便会发现那里根本没有脚印，也没有美国国旗...那可就尴尬了...
Michael McFeely
Everything we want to do in space can be done with unmanned spacecraft, for less cost. After the ISS is retired, we should end manned space flight. It’s time to put government on a diet.
我们想在太空之中做的所有事情都可以通过无人飞船完成，而且成本也会更低。国际空间站退役之后我们就该结束载人航天飞行，是时候让政府缩衣节食了。
Everything we want to do in space can be done with unmanned spacecraft, for less cost. After the ISS is retired, we should end manned space flight. It’s time to put government on a diet.
我们想在太空之中做的所有事情都可以通过无人飞船完成，而且成本也会更低。国际空间站退役之后我们就该结束载人航天飞行，是时候让政府缩衣节食了。
Abdul malik Marvel
You dont even know the name of the Chinese space program but your busy making the comparison
你甚至不知道中国太空计划确切的名字，却急忙对比中美的太空计划。
You dont even know the name of the Chinese space program but your busy making the comparison
你甚至不知道中国太空计划确切的名字，却急忙对比中美的太空计划。
Samuel Lee
The core information supporting the headline is … nonsense. You are comparing a rocket literally sitting on the pad, to one which doesn’t exist — one whose upper stage engines are in development testing, and whose booster stage engines don’t even exist on paper. There are many things that China can claim to be “ahead” in. But I can quite confidently tell you, it ain’t this.
就连标题的核心内容都是在扯淡...你这是在拿一枚已经坐在发射台上的火箭和一枚根本不存在的火箭作比较。---后者的一级发动机还处于开发测试阶段，助推级发动机更是在纸面上都还不存在呢。中国可以在很多事情上宣称自己处于“领先”地位。但是我可以很自信地告诉你们，在这件事上，他们没法这么做。
The core information supporting the headline is … nonsense. You are comparing a rocket literally sitting on the pad, to one which doesn’t exist — one whose upper stage engines are in development testing, and whose booster stage engines don’t even exist on paper. There are many things that China can claim to be “ahead” in. But I can quite confidently tell you, it ain’t this.
就连标题的核心内容都是在扯淡...你这是在拿一枚已经坐在发射台上的火箭和一枚根本不存在的火箭作比较。---后者的一级发动机还处于开发测试阶段，助推级发动机更是在纸面上都还不存在呢。中国可以在很多事情上宣称自己处于“领先”地位。但是我可以很自信地告诉你们，在这件事上，他们没法这么做。
goh cheesin
Quite funny actually, Westerner always kept busy trying to study others ! Can't American just do their own things like the Chinese does.
其实还挺有趣的，西方人总是在忙着研究别人！难道美国人就不能像中国人那样专心做好自己的事情吗？
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Quite funny actually, Westerner always kept busy trying to study others ! Can't American just do their own things like the Chinese does.
其实还挺有趣的，西方人总是在忙着研究别人！难道美国人就不能像中国人那样专心做好自己的事情吗？
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Tewa Taiyamoon
Why don’t talk about progress in Russia?
为什么没有人讨论俄罗斯在这一领域内的进展？
Why don’t talk about progress in Russia?
为什么没有人讨论俄罗斯在这一领域内的进展？
PCNRIDER
Is this moon race version 2? NASA already ahead by more than 50 years with Neil Armstrong. Doesn't Armstrong's achievements matter?
这是月球竞赛2.0版本吗？阿姆斯特朗的登陆让NASA领先了50多年。他所取得的成就难道就不算数吗？
Is this moon race version 2? NASA already ahead by more than 50 years with Neil Armstrong. Doesn't Armstrong's achievements matter?
这是月球竞赛2.0版本吗？阿姆斯特朗的登陆让NASA领先了50多年。他所取得的成就难道就不算数吗？
Nitho LX
LMAO... HOLLYWOOD lunar mission dont count
笑死，好莱坞的登月任务当然不算数。
LMAO... HOLLYWOOD lunar mission dont count
笑死，好莱坞的登月任务当然不算数。
silvério rebelo
so, the USA are unable to return to the Moon after 60 years... despite using basically the same technology... lo lol lol lol the truth is that they never landed there in the first place...
所以，尽管美国使用了基本相同的技术，但是他们依旧无法在60年后重返月球....哈哈哈哈，事实上他们从来就没有登陆过那里。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
so, the USA are unable to return to the Moon after 60 years... despite using basically the same technology... lo lol lol lol the truth is that they never landed there in the first place...
所以，尽管美国使用了基本相同的技术，但是他们依旧无法在60年后重返月球....哈哈哈哈，事实上他们从来就没有登陆过那里。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Tua Thaukui
Artemis failure put India ahead of US aerospace , India numbar one aerospace country in the world
阿尔忒弥斯的失败让印度在航空航天领域领先于美国，印度是世界上最顶尖的航天强国。
Artemis failure put India ahead of US aerospace , India numbar one aerospace country in the world
阿尔忒弥斯的失败让印度在航空航天领域领先于美国，印度是世界上最顶尖的航天强国。
ck LIM
It is not the race. There is no race. Everybody has own plan and agenda. No one is a winner or looser
这并不是一场竞赛。每个国家都有自己的计划和议程，没有人是赢家或者输家。
It is not the race. There is no race. Everybody has own plan and agenda. No one is a winner or looser
这并不是一场竞赛。每个国家都有自己的计划和议程，没有人是赢家或者输家。
Mary ono
Maybe the ameriCAN'T forget how to go to the moon because it is already 50 years ago
也许美国孬人已经忘了该如何登月了，因为那已经是50年前的事情了。
Maybe the ameriCAN'T forget how to go to the moon because it is already 50 years ago
也许美国孬人已经忘了该如何登月了，因为那已经是50年前的事情了。
很赞 3
收藏