27人在英吉利海峡溺亡,英国和法国海岸警卫队相互“踢皮球”
2022-11-15 jiangye111 8519
正文翻译
UK and French coastguards ‘passed buck’ as 27 people drowned in Channel
-Crucial hours wasted debating who should rescue dinghy carrying 34 passengers, ITV documentary reveals

27人在英吉利海峡溺亡,英国和法国海岸警卫队相互“踢皮球”
——英国独立电视台的纪录片揭示,关键的几个小时被浪费在争论到底应该谁去救载有34名乘客的小艇上


(People’s belongings, along with a deflated dinghy, life jacket and engines, lie on a beach in Wimereux, near Calais, the morning after the drownings.)

(溺水事件发生后的第二天早上,遇难者的物品,连同一艘瘪了的小艇、救生衣和发动机,躺在加莱附近维默鲁的海滩上。)
新闻:

UK and French emergency coastguard services spent crucial hours passing the buck about which of them should rescue a stricken small boat trying to cross the Channel last November, instead of dispatching a crew to save the 34 people onboard, a documentary reveals.

一部纪录片显示,去年11月,英国和法国的紧急海岸警卫队在关键的几个小时里都在踢皮球,争论到底应该谁去救一艘试图横渡英吉利海峡的遇难小船,而不是派出一个救援组去拯救船上的34人。

Most of the migrants subsequently drowned in the worst maritime disaster in the Channel for 30 years.

大多数落水移民随后在这一英吉利海峡30年来最严重的海难中溺亡。

The revelations come at a time when Channel crossings in small boats have reached record levels, with about 40,000 people having crossed so far this year.

这些消息披露之际,小船横渡英吉利海峡的人数达到了创纪录的水平,今年迄今已有大约4万人横渡英吉利海峡。
原创翻译:龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


The documentary, The Crossing, part of ITV’s award-winning Exposure series, has gained access to documents that provide new evidence about the fatal journey of the 34 passengers onboard the overcrowded dinghy. At least 27 people died, with five still missing and two survivors.

英国独立电视台获奖纪录片《曝光》的一部分,纪录片《穿越》获得了有关这艘拥挤的小艇上34名乘客致命旅程的新证据。至少27人死亡,5人失踪,2人幸存。

Issa Mohammed, a Somali asylum seeker and one of the two survivors, provides a detailed testimony in the documentary. He said: “Children were screaming. All I could hear were the screams of children drowning. I saw dead bodies floating by my side. That’s when the horror kicked in.”

两名幸存者之一、寻求庇护的索马里人伊萨·穆罕默德在纪录片中提供了详细的证词。他说:“孩子们在尖叫。我只能听到孩子们溺水的尖叫声。我看到尸体在我身边漂浮。就在这时,恐惧开始袭来。”

Internal legal documents obtained by the documentary team set out in minute-by-minute detail the events of that night, based on the French coastguard’s emergency log of the incident.

根据法国海岸警卫队对该事件的紧急记录,纪录片小组获得的内部法律文件精确到分详细记录了当晚发生的事件。
原创翻译:龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


While the French coastguard has disclosed its record of emergency calls to lawyers in the case as part of the French investigation into the tragedy, so far its UK counterpart has not. In the UK, the Marine Accident Investigation Branch is conducting an investigation.

作为法国对这场悲剧调查的一部分,法国海岸警卫队披露了向此案律师拨打紧急电话的记录,但英国海岸警卫队迄今没有披露。在英国,这一海上事故调查处正在进行调查。

At 4.34am on 24 November the French coastguard closed its incident log assuming it had been dealt with by British rescue services. This was not the case.

11月24日凌晨4点34分,法国海岸警卫队关闭了事故记录,以为英国救援机构已经处理好了。但事实并非如此。

While UK logs of the mass drowning have not been disclosed, internal UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency documents have raised questions about how SOS calls from small boats are handled. One document reveals a flowchart for search and rescue termination of a migrant incident. It states: “UK Border Force determine if vessel will meet UKBF criteria to deploy tactics.”

虽然英国没有公开集体溺水的记录,但英国海事和海岸警卫队的内部文件提出了关于如何处理来自小船的SOS呼叫的问题。一份文件显示了一个移民事件的搜索和救援终止流程图。声明称:“英国边境部队决定船只是否符合英国边境部队管理局的标准,以部署战术。”

Another internal document, titled Broadcast Action for Migrant Incidents, states there has been confusion about when a mayday distress call can be broadcast in relation to migrant boats in distress.

另一份名为《针对移民事件的广播行动》的内部文件指出,对于何时可以广播遇险移民船的呼救呼叫,一直存在界定不清。

The document says: “The actions taken in the distress phase can be different for small boat migrant incidents to other more conventional distress incidents and if the SMC [senior mission commander] considers that distress broadcast is not appropriate for small boat migrant incidents then that is acceptable.”

该文件称:“针对小船移民事件,在遇险阶段采取的行动可能与其他更常规的遇险事件有所不同。如果任务高级指挥官认为遇险广播不适用于小船移民事件,那么这(不启动救援机制)就是可以接受的。”
原创翻译:龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


According to the internal French legal documents, the first call for help from passengers on the dinghy to the French coastguard at the Cross Gris-Nez regional office came at 1.48am on 24 November when the boat started taking in water and began to deflate. The engine stopped and efforts by the passengers to bale out the water from the dinghy also failed.

根据法国内部法律文件,11月24日凌晨1点48分,这艘小船上的乘客第一次向格里斯-内兹地区的法国海岸警卫队呼叫求救,当时小船开始进水并开始漏气气。引擎停止了,乘客试图从小艇里舀出水的努力也失败了。

The passengers were informed wrongly by the emergency services that help was on its way. Passengers sent the GPS location of the boat to the emergency services repeatedly but as the hours went by they lost hope and drowned one by one.

紧急服务部门错误地通知乘客救援正在路上。乘客们不断向紧急服务机构发送GPS定位,但随着时间的流逝,他们失去了希望,一个接一个地淹死了。

Emergency services could hear the screams of people drowning. Passengers begged them to come, saying: “We are dying come and get us.”

急救人员可以听到溺水者的尖叫声。乘客们恳求他们过来,说:“我们快死了,快来捞我们。”

At 2.28am, the French coastguard called its English equivalent, gave the position of the boat and said that now it was in English waters it was no longer its responsibility, according to the internal legal documents.

根据内部法律文件,凌晨2点28分,法国海岸警卫队呼叫了英国海岸警卫队,给出了该船的位置,并表示现在该船位于英国水域,不再由其负责。

At 2.44am, the English coastguard emailed Cross Gris-Nez to say it considered the boat was in French territorial waters as it could hear a continental ringtone on a passenger’s phone.

凌晨2点44分,英国海岸警卫队发电子邮件给格里斯-内兹说,他们认为这艘船在法国领海内,因为他们听到了一名乘客手机上的欧洲大陆铃声。

At 4.16am, a last call was made to the French coastguard, saying: “People are in the water, it’s over.”

凌晨4点16分,法国海岸警卫队接到了最后一通电话:“人们都在水里,全都完了。”

At the same time, a vessel called Concerto reported seeing a small boat in distress and asked the emergency services if it should rescue it. Cross Gris-Nez said another rescue boat was on its way but no rescue took place.

与此同时,一艘名为“协奏曲”号的船只报告说,看到一艘小船遇险,并询问紧急服务部门是否应该救援它。格里斯-内兹答复,另一艘救援船正在前往的途中,但其实并没有救援行动发生。

Matthew Schanck, a maritime expert instructed by lawyers for some of the victims’ families, said: “The fact of the matter is that over 30 people were left in the middle of one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world slowly perishing one by one and almost nothing happened.”

受部分遇难者家属律师委托的海事专家马修·尚克表示:“事实是,30多人被留在世界上最繁忙的航道之一的中心,一个接一个地慢慢死去,而几乎什么(救援)都没有发生。”

A government spokesperson said: “Our thoughts are with the families of all of those who lost their lives in the tragic incident last November. As is standard practice in such circumstances, the Marine Accident Investigation Branch is conducting a safety investigation focusing on the emergency response to the incident, which HM Coastguard and the Home Office are fully cooperating with.

一位政府发言人说:“我们与在去年11月的悲剧事件中失去生命的所有人的家庭同在。按照这种情况下的标准做法,海上事故调查处正在进行安全调查,重点是对事故的紧急反应,英国海岸警卫队和内政部正在全力配合。

“It would be inappropriate to comment further while the investigation is ongoing.”

“在调查进行期间,不适合进一步置评。”

Cross Gris-Nez has been approached for comment.

我们已经联系了格里斯-内兹,请其置评。

评论翻译
Ramiren
How exactly is this the UK's fault?
The French let economic migrants into France, they let traffickers conduct business, they allow them to congregate on their shores, and they allowed them to set sail and continue to sail for 45 minutes until they hit British waters.
I don't want to see anyone drowning, it's a horrendous way to go. But if I were to die in a car crash because I'm speeding, nobody would bat an eyelid, they'd say that's why laws against speeding exist in the first place, and I died because I was reckless and put myself in danger. The same applies here, there are legal routes of entry into this country, by ignoring them and trying to jump the queue they put themselves at risk and if the worst should occur, unfortunately that's because they were reckless and put themselves in danger. The only people to blame here are those who enable and engage in such recklessness.

怎么就成了英国的错?
是法国人允许经济移民进入法国,他们允许人贩子做生意,他们允许他们聚集在他们的海岸上,他们允许他们起航并继续航行45分钟直到他们到达英国水域。
我不想看到任何人被淹死,这是一种可怕的死法。但如果我因为自己超速而死于车祸,人们会对此不屑一顾,他们会说,这就是禁止超速的法律存在的原因,我的死是因为我自己鲁莽,把自己置于危险之中。同样的道理也适用于这种事,有进入这个国家的合法途径,但无视这些途径并试图插队,是他们将自己置于危险之中的,如果最坏的情况发生了,很不幸,那是因为他们鲁莽,自己将自己置于危险之中。唯一应该指责的是那些纵容和参与这种鲁莽行为的人。

Ecstatic-Gas-6700
The ONLY way to claim asylum in the U.K. is by being on our shores. 75% of those that cross are eventually given refugee status. Government policy FORCES the desperate to make these crossings. France offered to let the U.K. set up asylum processing centres but we refused. Don’t act like these deaths aren’t a direct result of our repulsive policies.

在英国申请庇护的唯一方法就是来到我们的海岸。75%的越境者最终获得了难民身份。政府政策迫使绝望的人越境。法国提出让英国建立庇护处理中心,但我们拒绝了。别搞得好像这些死亡不是我们令人厌恶的政策直接造成的似的。

Deep9one
Try buying a ferry ticket, they don't cost upwards of €5000, like what the traffickers charge them for a rubber dingy.
Oh wait they can't as that would require a passport, which they don't have as they are illegally trying to gain entry to a sovereign island nation.
I don't care about being downvoted to oblivion for being a realist, they aren't coming here legally so why should we continue to care after a decade of this nonsense happening?
Loss of life is sad regardless of circumstance but this story is repeated daily, on the hour with a various number of illegals from different nations, I'm bored of hearing it at this point.

试着买一张渡轮票,它们不会超过5000欧元——大概等同于人贩子向他们收取的橡胶橡皮艇偷渡费。
哦,等等,他们做不到,因为那需要护照,他们没有护照,因为他们正在非法试图进入一个主权岛屿国家。
我不在乎因为我是一个现实主义者而被踩,他们不是合法来到这里的,所以在这种荒谬的事情发生了十年之后,我们为什么还要继续关心他们呢?
无论情况如何,生命的损失都是令人悲伤的,但这样的故事每天都在重复,每时每刻在来自不同国家的非法移民身上,此时此刻我已经听腻了。

Ecstatic-Gas-6700
God, there are some vile comments on here.
The ONLY way to seek asylum in the U.K. is to be in the U.K. There are obvious and easy solutions to stop these crossing but why would the government do that when these desperate people can instead be made into a bogeyman? France offered the U.K. asylum processing centres in France but we said no, forcing people into the water. And if you can’t understand why the truly desperate would make the journey, then you’re a sad little creature with a total lack of empathy or understanding of global politics. And don’t give me that shit of “they passed through all these safe countries…..” We take tiny amounts of refugees compared to our EU neighbours and our benefits are pathetic in comparison. You can’t call yourself ‘Great’ Britain, go around the world telling people how fantastic you are then get angry when they want to come here.
Yes, there are some twats that make the crossing but there are solutions and the government has chosen not to do them in order to appease the Daily Mail reading wankers now we can no longer blame everything on the EU.

天啊,这上面有些恶毒的评论。
在英国寻求庇护的唯一途径就是待在英国。有明显而简单的办法阻止他们越境,但当这些绝望的人可以变成鬼时,政府为什么要这么做呢?法国向英国提供在法国的庇护处理中心,但我们拒绝了,迫使人们入海。如果你不能理解为什么那些真正绝望的人会走上这条路,那么你就是一个完全缺乏同理心或对全球政治缺乏理解的可悲的小生物。别跟我说什么“他们穿越了所有这些安全的国家……”与欧盟邻国相比,我们接收的难民数量非常少,我们的福利也非常可怜。你不能称自己为“大”不列颠,然后在世界各地告诉人们你有多棒,然后在人们想来你这里的时候却为此愤怒。
是的,确实有一些SB越境,但也有解决办法,政府选择不这么做,以安抚那些阅读《每日邮报》的SB们。现在我们不能再把一切都归咎于欧盟了。

JoeyJoeCEssex
But why are they passing through so many safe countries? I'm actually trying to find an answer to that but everyone including yourself sidesteps it.

但为什么他们要穿过这么多安全的国家(不留下却非得来英国)呢?其实我也在试图找到答案,但包括你自己在内的所有人都在回避这个问题。
原创翻译:龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


Kitten_mittens_63
Language and undeclared work. It’s impossible to work without the proper paperwork in countries like Germany or France (and it takes a decade to get the proper paperwork) but it is in the UK where you have huge network of illegal and undeclared workers.

因为语言和未申报的工作。在德国或法国这样的国家,没有合法的文件是不可能工作的(获得合法的文件需要10年),但在英国,你有巨大的非法和未申报的工人网络。

RedPuppet11
why does the UK have a huge network of illegal and undeclared workers?

那为什么英国有一个庞大的非法和未申报的工人网络呢?

Kitten_mittens_63
Because there is not much enforcement of the laws against it. I’m not sure why, maybe lack of resource to enforce it but also it’s convenient for a lot of people as these services would become a lot more expensive if they were done with regular employment contracts (in fields like construction, cleaning, ...)

因为针对它的法律并没有太多的执行。我不确定为什么,可能是缺乏资源来执行,但这对很多人来说很方便,因为如果这些服务用常规的雇佣合同(比如建筑、清洁等领域)完成,将会变得昂贵得多。

virusofthemind
This is how the system works.
The migrants are recruited through social media (mainly Tik Tok) in their home countries and charged between £5,000 and £8,000 to be taken to the UK depending on their country of origin. This fee includes transportation, bribes, safe houses (where they're coached on what to say when they reach the UK in order to pass a asylum seekers) and the channel crossing.
They're obligated to leave their family back in their home country as leverage to the people smugglers (Albanian mafia) so they don't disappear when they reach the UK.
Some are allowed to travel to the UK as a partial family as the smugglers like to have at least one woman or child per boat for the channel crossing. The channel crossing is handled by the Kurdish mafia who take photos of the migrants and inform them that if they disappear they will be hunted down and killed in the Uk or their families will suffer back home.
Once they have been processed in the UK and placed in hotels they're immediately put to work in the black economy by Albanian gang masters who have taken the Bese oath of loyalty who will use ruthless discipline to ensure they do what they're told. Most Albanians abscond when they arrive to work in the drugs and prostitution industry which is jointly controlled by the Turkish mafia but each hotel has at least two gang masters.
Once the debt is paid (which can be as long as two years) they're released and they can begin the process of bringing their family over to the UK.

以下是整个系统的运作方式。
这些移民是通过他们本国的社交媒体(主要是抖音)招募的,根据他们的原籍国,将他们带到英国的费用在5000英镑到8000英镑不等。这笔费用包括交通、贿赂、安全屋(他们在那里接受指导,知道当他们到达英国时该说什么,以便通过寻求庇护者)和横渡英吉利海峡。
他们有义务把家人留在祖国,作为人贩子(阿尔巴尼亚黑手党)的筹码,以保证他们不会一到英国就逃跑消失。
有些人获准以部分家庭成员的身份前往英国,因为走私者希望每艘船至少有一名妇女或儿童通过英吉利海峡。穿越海峡是由库尔德黑手党负责的,他们给移民拍照,并告诉他们,如果他们消失,他们将在英国被追捕和杀害,或者他们的家人将在国内受苦。
一旦他们在英国被处理住进酒店他们马上就会被已经宣誓效忠贝斯的阿尔巴尼亚黑帮头目投入到黑市经济中去,他们会用无情的纪律来确保他们听话。大多数阿尔巴尼亚人抵达后会潜逃到毒品和卖淫行业工作,这些行业由土耳其黑手党共同控制,但每个酒店至少有两个黑帮头目。
一旦债务偿还(可能长达两年),他们就会被释放,并开始将他们的家人带到英国。
原创翻译:龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


Dmacca666
That sounds like the plot of a Channel 5 Steven Seagal film. Kurdish, Turkish AND Albanian mafia! Scary stuff....

这听起来像是第五频道史蒂文·西格尔电影的情节。库尔德,土耳其和阿尔巴尼亚黑手党!好可怕……

LeadingCoast7267
It’s not far off though there’s entire villages in Albania stripped of there young men seeking a better life in the UK. The Albanian mafia is the most powerful criminal organization in Europe they run the cocaine trade and a large portion of prostitution and cannabis grow houses in the UK. The Kurds also are mainly in charge of the boat smuggling but the Albanians are trying to take control of that now. Not sure about the Turks involvement but the Albanians do use the migrants families as leverage to force them to work in their crime.

这并不遥远,尽管阿尔巴尼亚的整个村庄都被剥夺了,那里的年轻人在英国寻求更好的生活。阿尔巴尼亚黑手党是欧洲最强大的犯罪组织,他们经营可卡因贸易,在英国有很大一部分卖淫和大麻种植屋。库尔德人还主要负责船只走私,但阿尔巴尼亚人正试图掌控这个市场。不确定土耳其人是否参与其中,但阿尔巴尼亚人确实利用移民家庭作为筹码迫使他们参与犯罪。

ImmediateSilver4063
Would it not be possible to make an agreement with the French to open an office in calais to process asylum requests there ?

难道不可能与法国达成协议,在加莱开设一个办事处,处理那里的庇护请求吗?

070420210854
For the longest time, all we hear are ideas how to solve this "invasion" (push back the boats, copy Australia, leave the ECHR, Rwanda with 200 spaces or convert UK army barracks etc.)
There is one possible solution that I don't think has been tableted.
It will need the buy in with the French too, but I am sure the people of Calais want a solution.
In short, everyone (or most) who is picked up at sea or who make it to our beaches is taken straight back to Calais with a clear message, "You have wasted your money and try this again, you will be returned back to safe France".
This will smash the business model of the small boats and the gangs running them.
Yes, there is be some pain for the French and many more numbers in the "jungle" or the tents, but once words gets out that the French and British have agreed to this, most people will stop paying for this route.
As the UK tax paper has to pay £150 per person per night for the hotels (for years) we can help with the short term surge in the Calais numbers. It is win/win and will reduce the risk to life at sea.

很长一段时间,我们听到的都是如何解决这种“入侵”的想法(把船赶回去,效仿澳大利亚的做法,退出欧洲人权法庭,卢旺达有200个名额,或者改造英国军营等等)。
有一个可能的解决方案我认为还没有被提出。
这也需要法国的支持,但我相信加莱人民想要一个解决方案。
简而言之,每个(或大多数)在海上被救起或抵达我们海滩的人都会被直接带回加莱,并附带一个明确的信息:“你浪费了你的钱,你可以再试一次,但你将被送回安全的法国。”
这将粉碎偷渡小船和经营偷渡小船的团伙的商业模式。
是的,法国人和更多在“丛林”或帐篷里的人会感到痛苦,但一旦法国和英国同意这样做的消息传出去,大多数人就会停止为这条路线付费。
由于英国税务部门(多年来)必须为每人每晚支付150英镑的酒店费用,我们可以帮助解决加莱人数的短期激增。这是双赢的,并将降低海上安全风险。

Early-Plankton-4091
But France isn’t delighted to host them either that’s why there’s no urgency from them to stop this. And why their happy for them to drown but in uk waters to avoid the bad PR

但是法国也不乐意接待他们,这就是为什么他们没有紧急阻止这一切的原因。为什么他们很高兴他们淹死在英国水域,以避免糟糕的公关

070420210854
But if we work with the French it kills the business model, nobody will pay £5,000 to just get returned the same day.
Game over for the gangs.
It is a win win situation.

但如果我们和法国人合作,就会破坏我们的商业模式,没有人会花5000英镑然后当天就被退回来。
黑帮的游戏结束了。
这是一个双赢的局面。

Early-Plankton-4091
But it’s never going to happen, we burned those bridges with brexit. And why would the agree to take them all back, they don’t want them either? Why would they agree to take every migrant in return for us taking none? Unless we set up a way for them to apply for asylum at Calais and bring them ourselves which again our government nor any other would do, it’s voter suicide. If there was a solution that easy that benefitted everyone we’d be doing it. It doesn’t come down to business it comes down to politics and there’s no winners in that

但这永远不可能发生,我们在脱欧的过程中毁了这些桥梁。为什么他们会同意把他们都带回去,在他们也不想要这些偷渡客的时候?为什么他们会同意接收所有移民而我们一个都不接收?除非我们为他们提供在加莱申请庇护的途径,并亲自把他们带来,而我们的政府和其他任何政府都不会这么做,这是选票自杀行为。如果有这么简单的解决方案能让所有人都受益,我们早就这么做了。这不是商业问题,而是政治问题,没有赢家

Lighthazle
We should do all we can to stop migrants from drowning, but they're responsible for their own actions. Risking your life and your children's lives to move from France to the UK is stupid and unnecessary.

我们应该尽我们所能阻止移民溺水,但他们要为自己的行为负责。冒着你和你孩子的生命危险从法国转移到英国是愚蠢和不必要的。

matrixreloading
So 27 idiots get into a small boat, get into trouble, and it's not their own stupid fault?
Why can't some of the blame rest on their shoulders of the victims as well?
And let's also try the other line of logic, what if every day there were thousands of boats in trouble, would the government be expected to spend unlimited amounts of money rescuing people?
The fact is, the third world produces far more people in distress every year, than first world countries can absorb. It's not possible to save everyone, deal with it.

所以27个白痴上了一艘小船,惹上了麻烦,而这不是他们自己愚蠢的错吗?
为什么不能把一些责任也推到受害者身上呢?
让我们尝试另一种逻辑,如果每天都有成千上万的船陷入困境,政府还会花无限量的钱去救人吗?
事实是,第三世界每年产生的贫困人口远远超过第一世界国家所能吸收的。我们不可能拯救所有人的,面对现实吧。

Elizaleth
27 people tried to cross a treacherous body of water, knowingly unprepared, without alxing authorities to their actions. They were taking their lives into their own hands. And they died because of it.
It would have been great if they could have been saved but all responsibility here lies with the reckless victims.

27人在明知毫无准备的情况下,试图穿越危险的水域,却没有向政府通报他们的行动。他们自己的生命掌握在他们自己手中。他们因此而死。
如果他们能获救就太好了,但所有责任都在那些鲁莽的受害者自己身上。

wumbology55
At what point do we need to just accept these are human beings and forget the who’s to blame bollocks. I get sick hearing people arguing over who’s fault it is that people died. ANYONE FUCKING DO SOMETHING JESUS CHRIST STOP LETTING PEOPLE DIE

我们究竟要到何时才需要接受他们是人,并忘记谁是罪魁祸首。我讨厌听到人们争论人们的死是谁的错。谁敢做点什么啊,上帝啊,别让人们再死去了

很赞 1
收藏