小米首款电动汽车SU7的续航里程为800公里，自动驾驶系统优于特斯拉
正文翻译
评论翻译
@francisdebriey3609
I welcome a newcomer ! We need competition to bring prices down. And I agree xiaomi's car looks very promising
我欢迎造车新势力!我们需要竞争来降低价格。我同意小米汽车看起来很有前途
@francisdebriey3609
I welcome a newcomer ! We need competition to bring prices down. And I agree xiaomi's car looks very promising
我欢迎造车新势力!我们需要竞争来降低价格。我同意小米汽车看起来很有前途
@leswhitehouse
I've had xiaomi phones, smart watches and toothbrushes (!) for years and they've been amazing value and top quality. No reason to think the car would be anything but technically brilliant.
我使用小米手机、智能手表和牙刷已经很多年了，它们的价值和质量都非常高。没有理由认为这辆车会在技术上不出色。
I've had xiaomi phones, smart watches and toothbrushes (!) for years and they've been amazing value and top quality. No reason to think the car would be anything but technically brilliant.
我使用小米手机、智能手表和牙刷已经很多年了，它们的价值和质量都非常高。没有理由认为这辆车会在技术上不出色。
@laohu5511
Yes under rated brand across the board.
是的，小米品牌被低估了。
Yes under rated brand across the board.
是的，小米品牌被低估了。
@blackknight4996
I have 2 vacuum cleaning robots and smart fan....superb!
我有2个（小米）扫地机器人和智能风扇....它们棒极了!
I have 2 vacuum cleaning robots and smart fan....superb!
我有2个（小米）扫地机器人和智能风扇....它们棒极了!
@pegefounder
3 from 4 smartphones in my family are from xiaomi. Maybe the same happens with cars.
我们家4部智能手机中有3部都是小米的。也许汽车也会如此。
3 from 4 smartphones in my family are from xiaomi. Maybe the same happens with cars.
我们家4部智能手机中有3部都是小米的。也许汽车也会如此。
@mrmawson2438
Looks bloody cracking and 800 km range
看起来很酷，有800公里续航，不错
Looks bloody cracking and 800 km range
看起来很酷，有800公里续航，不错
@changshu6463
In China, the current regulations limit autonomous driving to Level 2, which requires drivers to maintain their hands on the steering wheel. However, in 2024, a trial of Level 4 autonomous driving (fully autonomous) is planned in sext cities. Drivers wishing to participate in this trial will need to pass a specific test and obtain an additional license. Consequently, the validity of xiaomi's claims about autonomous driving in 2024 remains uncertain. Meanwhile, other car manufacturers have already developed Level 4 technology and are awaiting upxes in policy to proceed.
在中国，现行法规将自动驾驶限制在 2 级，即要求驾驶员将手放在方向盘上。不过，计划于 2024 年在部分城市进行 4 级自动驾驶（完全自动驾驶）的试验。希望参加该试验的驾驶员需要通过特定的测试，并获得额外的驾照。因此，小米关于 2024 年自动驾驶的说法是否属实仍不确定。与此同时，其他汽车制造商已经开发出第四级技术，正在等待政策的更新，以便继续推进。
In China, the current regulations limit autonomous driving to Level 2, which requires drivers to maintain their hands on the steering wheel. However, in 2024, a trial of Level 4 autonomous driving (fully autonomous) is planned in sext cities. Drivers wishing to participate in this trial will need to pass a specific test and obtain an additional license. Consequently, the validity of xiaomi's claims about autonomous driving in 2024 remains uncertain. Meanwhile, other car manufacturers have already developed Level 4 technology and are awaiting upxes in policy to proceed.
在中国，现行法规将自动驾驶限制在 2 级，即要求驾驶员将手放在方向盘上。不过，计划于 2024 年在部分城市进行 4 级自动驾驶（完全自动驾驶）的试验。希望参加该试验的驾驶员需要通过特定的测试，并获得额外的驾照。因此，小米关于 2024 年自动驾驶的说法是否属实仍不确定。与此同时，其他汽车制造商已经开发出第四级技术，正在等待政策的更新，以便继续推进。
@bobmorane4926
Isn't Huawei M9 a level 3 car ?
华为M9不是3级吗?
Isn't Huawei M9 a level 3 car ?
华为M9不是3级吗?
@changshu6463
@bobmorane4926
It's hardware should be capable for L4, software is currently L3-L4, but only L2 is allowed now (hands on wheel). Parking area is not public road so you might see some video showing Huawei's car run driverless finding a car park slot, but on city road it's still L2. L3 (hands off) will be tested early this year, and time of L4 (no driver) is not clear
它的硬件应该能够支持4级，软件目前是3级-4级，但现在只允许2级(手放在方向盘上)。停车场不是公共道路，所以你可能会看到一些视频显示华为的无人驾驶汽车找到了一个停车位，但在城市道路上它仍然是二级。三级(不干涉)将在今年年初进行测试，4级(无驾驶员)的时间还不清楚
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@bobmorane4926
It's hardware should be capable for L4, software is currently L3-L4, but only L2 is allowed now (hands on wheel). Parking area is not public road so you might see some video showing Huawei's car run driverless finding a car park slot, but on city road it's still L2. L3 (hands off) will be tested early this year, and time of L4 (no driver) is not clear
它的硬件应该能够支持4级，软件目前是3级-4级，但现在只允许2级(手放在方向盘上)。停车场不是公共道路，所以你可能会看到一些视频显示华为的无人驾驶汽车找到了一个停车位，但在城市道路上它仍然是二级。三级(不干涉)将在今年年初进行测试，4级(无驾驶员)的时间还不清楚
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Peye-pv4cb
Who the hell will allow a car to drive hands off the wheel, stuff that
谁会允许驾驶汽车时双手离开方向盘？
Who the hell will allow a car to drive hands off the wheel, stuff that
谁会允许驾驶汽车时双手离开方向盘？
@turtlesoup8134
@avgjoe5969
its not a gimmick if the city is as large as shanghai with over 30 million population. it itself is a large market and I for one is waiting for an L3 car to be able to be driven around shanghai autonomously. I hate driving and I will but any car with the best autonomous driving. I barely drive outside the city and multi-city driving is not that meaningful for me.
如果城市像上海这样大，人口超过 3000 万，那就不是噱头了。它本身就是一个巨大的市场，我就等着 L3 汽车能在上海自动驾驶。我讨厌开车，但我会选择任何自动驾驶性能最好的汽车。我几乎不在市外开车，在城市之间驾驶对我来说意义不大。
@avgjoe5969
its not a gimmick if the city is as large as shanghai with over 30 million population. it itself is a large market and I for one is waiting for an L3 car to be able to be driven around shanghai autonomously. I hate driving and I will but any car with the best autonomous driving. I barely drive outside the city and multi-city driving is not that meaningful for me.
如果城市像上海这样大，人口超过 3000 万，那就不是噱头了。它本身就是一个巨大的市场，我就等着 L3 汽车能在上海自动驾驶。我讨厌开车，但我会选择任何自动驾驶性能最好的汽车。我几乎不在市外开车，在城市之间驾驶对我来说意义不大。
@mrg4847
xiaomi has been arounfd a long time but into appliances, etc. Good to have a competitor for us consumers.
小米已经存在很长时间了，但主要是生产家电等。对我们消费者来说，多一个竞争对手是好事。
xiaomi has been arounfd a long time but into appliances, etc. Good to have a competitor for us consumers.
小米已经存在很长时间了，但主要是生产家电等。对我们消费者来说，多一个竞争对手是好事。
@635574
Several tech and tesla youtubers have already said befote this news came out that its a lot easier for tech company to become ev company than legacy auto to turn into tech company that makes EVs.
在这条新闻出来之前，一些科技博主和特斯拉的油管博主就已经说过，科技公司变成电动汽车公司，比传统汽车公司变成电动汽车公司要容易得多。
Several tech and tesla youtubers have already said befote this news came out that its a lot easier for tech company to become ev company than legacy auto to turn into tech company that makes EVs.
在这条新闻出来之前，一些科技博主和特斯拉的油管博主就已经说过，科技公司变成电动汽车公司，比传统汽车公司变成电动汽车公司要容易得多。
@senoow4215
And China has it all
而中国全都有
And China has it all
而中国全都有
@sntxrrr
Its the same reason as to why Apple created the first modern smartphone. The product was obvious but only Apple could invest a billion+ in new hardware and software instead of the financially low risk of gradually upgrading your legacy products which all the other - now extinct - cell phone companies did.
这与苹果公司创造第一款现代智能手机的原因如出一辙。产品是显而易见的，但只有苹果公司敢在新的硬件和软件上投资十多亿美元，而不是像其他所有手机公司（现在已经倒闭）那样，以较低的财务风险逐步升级传统产品。
Its the same reason as to why Apple created the first modern smartphone. The product was obvious but only Apple could invest a billion+ in new hardware and software instead of the financially low risk of gradually upgrading your legacy products which all the other - now extinct - cell phone companies did.
这与苹果公司创造第一款现代智能手机的原因如出一辙。产品是显而易见的，但只有苹果公司敢在新的硬件和软件上投资十多亿美元，而不是像其他所有手机公司（现在已经倒闭）那样，以较低的财务风险逐步升级传统产品。
@laohu5511
In the future you will need to transform into a tech company to make EVs if you cannot do that you won't be making cutting edge EVs.
在未来，你需要转型成为一家科技公司从而生产电动汽车，如果你不能做到这一点，你就生产不出尖端的电动汽车。
In the future you will need to transform into a tech company to make EVs if you cannot do that you won't be making cutting edge EVs.
在未来，你需要转型成为一家科技公司从而生产电动汽车，如果你不能做到这一点，你就生产不出尖端的电动汽车。
@Arthurpx
@sntxrrr
apple need JOBS can do this
苹果需要乔布斯才能做到这一点
@sntxrrr
apple need JOBS can do this
苹果需要乔布斯才能做到这一点
@kalleankaheladagen
If xiaomi can charge a phones 5 000 mAh battery from 0-100% in 19 min I'm not surprised over what they can do with an EV. xiaomi 13T is the phone in question and I'm using it now.
如果小米手机能在 19 分钟内将 5000 毫安时的电池电量从 0 充至 100%，那么他们在电动汽车上的表现也就不会令人失望了。我现在使用的就是小米13T手机。
If xiaomi can charge a phones 5 000 mAh battery from 0-100% in 19 min I'm not surprised over what they can do with an EV. xiaomi 13T is the phone in question and I'm using it now.
如果小米手机能在 19 分钟内将 5000 毫安时的电池电量从 0 充至 100%，那么他们在电动汽车上的表现也就不会令人失望了。我现在使用的就是小米13T手机。
@scottw4208
Mi is awesome all around - best value of anything out there, phone or car ❤️
小米在所有方面都很棒——性价比最高，不管是手机还是汽车️
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Mi is awesome all around - best value of anything out there, phone or car ❤️
小米在所有方面都很棒——性价比最高，不管是手机还是汽车️
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@ch1kusoo
Very ambitious of xiaomi but I'll wait for the reviews. I am still trying to digest the idea that companies that makes consumer electronics like smartphones, computers, telecommunications equipment (Huawei) coming into the EV space. I remembered i read somewhere that Terry Gou, the boss of Foxconn said he wants his factories to be setup to make cars as well. I think that's going to be the trend going forward but i dunno how successful they will be.
小米野心勃勃，但我还是想等等看。我仍在努力消化智能手机、电脑、电信设备(华为)等消费电子产品制造商进入电动汽车领域的想法。我记得我在什么地方读到过，富士康的老板郭台铭说他希望他的工厂也能生产电动汽车。我认为这将是未来的趋势，但我不知道他们会有多成功。
Very ambitious of xiaomi but I'll wait for the reviews. I am still trying to digest the idea that companies that makes consumer electronics like smartphones, computers, telecommunications equipment (Huawei) coming into the EV space. I remembered i read somewhere that Terry Gou, the boss of Foxconn said he wants his factories to be setup to make cars as well. I think that's going to be the trend going forward but i dunno how successful they will be.
小米野心勃勃，但我还是想等等看。我仍在努力消化智能手机、电脑、电信设备(华为)等消费电子产品制造商进入电动汽车领域的想法。我记得我在什么地方读到过，富士康的老板郭台铭说他希望他的工厂也能生产电动汽车。我认为这将是未来的趋势，但我不知道他们会有多成功。
@bearcubdaycare
The video says "they make more electric scooters than anyone else in the world". That's still a big jump, but Suzuki started in looms, and BMW in aircraft engines, farm equipment, and household products, then a motorcycle. It's conventional automakers that seem to be struggling with how to think in a new realm. It might prove an advantage to be coming from outside the auto industry, given which companies are succeeding in EVs and which aren't.
视频中说 "他们生产的电动踏板车比世界上任何其他公司都多"。这是一个很大的飞跃，但铃木是从织布机起家的，宝马是从飞机发动机、农用设备和家用产品起家的，然后才是摩托车。传统汽车制造商似乎正在苦苦思索如何适应一个全新的领域。考虑到某些公司在电动汽车领域取得了成功，而某些公司却没有，证明非汽车行业的公司反而更具优势。
The video says "they make more electric scooters than anyone else in the world". That's still a big jump, but Suzuki started in looms, and BMW in aircraft engines, farm equipment, and household products, then a motorcycle. It's conventional automakers that seem to be struggling with how to think in a new realm. It might prove an advantage to be coming from outside the auto industry, given which companies are succeeding in EVs and which aren't.
视频中说 "他们生产的电动踏板车比世界上任何其他公司都多"。这是一个很大的飞跃，但铃木是从织布机起家的，宝马是从飞机发动机、农用设备和家用产品起家的，然后才是摩托车。传统汽车制造商似乎正在苦苦思索如何适应一个全新的领域。考虑到某些公司在电动汽车领域取得了成功，而某些公司却没有，证明非汽车行业的公司反而更具优势。
@DC.409
The Mercedes Vision EQXX is the first EV that can go more than 700 miles (1000km) on a charge, that was two years ago. The British startup company that developed the motor and associated energy control, was supported by Mercedes. Mercedes has since bought the company, similar to Porsche burying Remac. This technology is being brought to the next generation of BEV.
两年前，奔驰Vision EQXX是第一款充电里程超过700英里(1000公里)的电动汽车。这家英国初创公司开发了发动机和相关的能源控制系统，得到了梅赛德斯的支持。梅赛德斯后来收购了这家公司，就像保时捷收购了雷马克一样。这项技术正被引入下一代纯电动汽车中。
The Mercedes Vision EQXX is the first EV that can go more than 700 miles (1000km) on a charge, that was two years ago. The British startup company that developed the motor and associated energy control, was supported by Mercedes. Mercedes has since bought the company, similar to Porsche burying Remac. This technology is being brought to the next generation of BEV.
两年前，奔驰Vision EQXX是第一款充电里程超过700英里(1000公里)的电动汽车。这家英国初创公司开发了发动机和相关的能源控制系统，得到了梅赛德斯的支持。梅赛德斯后来收购了这家公司，就像保时捷收购了雷马克一样。这项技术正被引入下一代纯电动汽车中。
@denero66
With the US EPA changing to even more conservative calculation of EPA range for EVs, the gap with Chinese EPA and US EPA is growing. It would be nice to know the US EPA of the 800km range. Re the ADAS, I wonder on what basis you determined that the ADAS is already the world’s best.
随着美国 EPA 对电动汽车 EPA 续航里程的计算方法变得更加保守，中国 EPA 与美国 EPA 的差距越来越大。如果能知道 800 公里续航里程的美国 EPA 值就好了。关于 ADAS（自动驾驶），我想知道，您是根据什么来确定（中国） ADAS 是世界上最好的？
With the US EPA changing to even more conservative calculation of EPA range for EVs, the gap with Chinese EPA and US EPA is growing. It would be nice to know the US EPA of the 800km range. Re the ADAS, I wonder on what basis you determined that the ADAS is already the world’s best.
随着美国 EPA 对电动汽车 EPA 续航里程的计算方法变得更加保守，中国 EPA 与美国 EPA 的差距越来越大。如果能知道 800 公里续航里程的美国 EPA 值就好了。关于 ADAS（自动驾驶），我想知道，您是根据什么来确定（中国） ADAS 是世界上最好的？
@Dave--FkTheDeepstate
Seems great, but I'll wait for my favorite YT car reviewers to get their hands on this.
看起来很棒，但我要等我最喜欢的油管汽车评论家的评论。
Seems great, but I'll wait for my favorite YT car reviewers to get their hands on this.
看起来很棒，但我要等我最喜欢的油管汽车评论家的评论。
@user-nf7og9bg6b
Who else remembers that Sony was going to co-develop an EV with Honda? They announced it and even built a prototype, but we have to wait till 2026 to get it. Seems EV outside of China need more time to built.
谁还记得索尼与本田合作开发的一款电动汽车?他们宣布了这一计划，甚至还制造了原型车，但我们要等到 2026 年才能见到它。似乎中国以外的电动汽车需要更多的时间来完成。
Who else remembers that Sony was going to co-develop an EV with Honda? They announced it and even built a prototype, but we have to wait till 2026 to get it. Seems EV outside of China need more time to built.
谁还记得索尼与本田合作开发的一款电动汽车?他们宣布了这一计划，甚至还制造了原型车，但我们要等到 2026 年才能见到它。似乎中国以外的电动汽车需要更多的时间来完成。
@davidhein6044
I wish they would implemente they're own charging network
我希望他们能建造自己的充电网络
I wish they would implemente they're own charging network
我希望他们能建造自己的充电网络
@jameshack485
$42K for the entry level version? Insane if that battery has a range over 300 miles. I bet xiaomi will try to make money on a subscxtion service for the self drive and other added tech functions
入门级版本要4.2万美元?电池续航里程超过300英里真是太疯狂了。我敢打赌小米会尝试通过自动驾驶和其他附加功能的订阅服务来赚钱
$42K for the entry level version? Insane if that battery has a range over 300 miles. I bet xiaomi will try to make money on a subscxtion service for the self drive and other added tech functions
入门级版本要4.2万美元?电池续航里程超过300英里真是太疯狂了。我敢打赌小米会尝试通过自动驾驶和其他附加功能的订阅服务来赚钱
@danoprea3066
@jameshack485
$42K may be the projected price in China, with the massive subsidies provided to indigenous manufacturers. Expect this car to be 60% more expensive outside China, before taxes (which can add a lot more to the price).
4.2万美元可能是中国的预计价格，中国给本土制造商提供了大量补贴。预计这款车在中国以外的税前价格将高出60%(这可能会让价格高了很多)。
@jameshack485
$42K may be the projected price in China, with the massive subsidies provided to indigenous manufacturers. Expect this car to be 60% more expensive outside China, before taxes (which can add a lot more to the price).
4.2万美元可能是中国的预计价格，中国给本土制造商提供了大量补贴。预计这款车在中国以外的税前价格将高出60%(这可能会让价格高了很多)。
@jluo18
they have not revealed the price yet (after all the car is not ready for order until the middle of 2024). I am pretty certain the starting price would be much less at around 30k otherwise they can hardly compete with other intenders like zeekr 007 or geely e8. 40k it's likely what the top model would cost.
他们还没有透露价格(毕竟这款车直到2024年中期才能上市)。我很确定起价会低得多，大概在3万左右，否则他们很难与其他厂商竞争，比如zeekr 007或吉利的e8。4万元很可能是顶级车型的价格。
they have not revealed the price yet (after all the car is not ready for order until the middle of 2024). I am pretty certain the starting price would be much less at around 30k otherwise they can hardly compete with other intenders like zeekr 007 or geely e8. 40k it's likely what the top model would cost.
他们还没有透露价格(毕竟这款车直到2024年中期才能上市)。我很确定起价会低得多，大概在3万左右，否则他们很难与其他厂商竞争，比如zeekr 007或吉利的e8。4万元很可能是顶级车型的价格。
@TB-up4xi
@danoprea3066
Correct that's the Chinese local price - for comparison an ID.7 is $33k in China, but will sell for 56k pounds in the UK, it will be close to $85k AUD and $55k USD
对，这是中国当地的价格——相比之下，ID.7在中国的售价是3.3万美元，但在英国的售价是5.6万英镑，接近8.5万澳元和5.5万美元
@danoprea3066
Correct that's the Chinese local price - for comparison an ID.7 is $33k in China, but will sell for 56k pounds in the UK, it will be close to $85k AUD and $55k USD
对，这是中国当地的价格——相比之下，ID.7在中国的售价是3.3万美元，但在英国的售价是5.6万英镑，接近8.5万澳元和5.5万美元
@user-me2dy6ct4z
I can forsee this car is going to sell well not only in China, will be selling well all over the world.
我可以预见这款车不仅在中国卖得很好，在全世界都会很畅销。
I can forsee this car is going to sell well not only in China, will be selling well all over the world.
我可以预见这款车不仅在中国卖得很好，在全世界都会很畅销。
@lrg3834
Will believe it when a few consumers buy them and confirm that the model does what is claimed when they say so. Before then, I’m sceptical.
当少数消费者购买它们，并确认该型号确实像小米所宣传的那样。在此之前，我还是持怀疑态度。
Will believe it when a few consumers buy them and confirm that the model does what is claimed when they say so. Before then, I’m sceptical.
当少数消费者购买它们，并确认该型号确实像小米所宣传的那样。在此之前，我还是持怀疑态度。
@BradKwfc
Range claim doesn't seem to match the 71kW battery but that's just me.
声称的续航能力似乎与 71 千瓦的电池不符，不过这只是我的个人看法。
Range claim doesn't seem to match the 71kW battery but that's just me.
声称的续航能力似乎与 71 千瓦的电池不符，不过这只是我的个人看法。
@nickmcconnell1291
Again the self driving that this car uses depends on detailed 3D mapping of the cities. Like GM's Cruise, it cannot go anywhere that it doesn't have a precise map for and if anything changes that is not in that map it maybe cannot handle it.
This tech is a great convenience feature but will meet a dead end as to its top end capabilities before it gets to the level of a human. Humans don't depend on maps to handle unique driving situations.
If you are shooting for level 4 or level 5 autonomy then your car has to be able to think on its own and handle new situations on its own just like a human can, else you might as well drive yourself.
这辆车使用的自动驾驶依赖于详细的城市3D地图。就像通用的Cruise一样，它不能去任何没有精确地图的地方，如果地图上没有更新，它可能无法处理。
这项技术是一个非常方便的功能，但在达到人类的水平之前，它的高端功能并不实用。人类并不依赖地图来处理特殊的驾驶状况。
如果你的目标是4级或5级自动驾驶，那么你的汽车必须能够像人类一样独立思考和处理突发状况，否则你还不如自己开。
Again the self driving that this car uses depends on detailed 3D mapping of the cities. Like GM's Cruise, it cannot go anywhere that it doesn't have a precise map for and if anything changes that is not in that map it maybe cannot handle it.
This tech is a great convenience feature but will meet a dead end as to its top end capabilities before it gets to the level of a human. Humans don't depend on maps to handle unique driving situations.
If you are shooting for level 4 or level 5 autonomy then your car has to be able to think on its own and handle new situations on its own just like a human can, else you might as well drive yourself.
这辆车使用的自动驾驶依赖于详细的城市3D地图。就像通用的Cruise一样，它不能去任何没有精确地图的地方，如果地图上没有更新，它可能无法处理。
这项技术是一个非常方便的功能，但在达到人类的水平之前，它的高端功能并不实用。人类并不依赖地图来处理特殊的驾驶状况。
如果你的目标是4级或5级自动驾驶，那么你的汽车必须能够像人类一样独立思考和处理突发状况，否则你还不如自己开。
@hhal9000
Absolutely.This may be a better implementation of a geofenced system than Cruise or Waymo but ultimately Tesla will have the better system by miles.Looks like we are getting to the point where autonomy(of one sort or another) is the competitive selling point of a modern car.At least in China. This was what Elon Musk predicted: that customers would demand a car with autonomy and those that didn't have it would be largely worthless.
是这样的。这可能是一个比Cruise或Waymo更好的地理围栏系统，但最终特斯拉将拥有更好的系统。看起来我们正在接近这样的一个时刻:自动驾驶(某种或另一种)将成为现代汽车的竞争卖点。至少在中国是这样。这正是埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)的预测:消费者会要求汽车能自动驾驶，而那些没有自动驾驶功能的汽车基本上毫无价值。
Absolutely.This may be a better implementation of a geofenced system than Cruise or Waymo but ultimately Tesla will have the better system by miles.Looks like we are getting to the point where autonomy(of one sort or another) is the competitive selling point of a modern car.At least in China. This was what Elon Musk predicted: that customers would demand a car with autonomy and those that didn't have it would be largely worthless.
是这样的。这可能是一个比Cruise或Waymo更好的地理围栏系统，但最终特斯拉将拥有更好的系统。看起来我们正在接近这样的一个时刻:自动驾驶(某种或另一种)将成为现代汽车的竞争卖点。至少在中国是这样。这正是埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)的预测:消费者会要求汽车能自动驾驶，而那些没有自动驾驶功能的汽车基本上毫无价值。
@ed410378468
xiaomi is not just a consumer electronics company; it is also an investment firm. The Chairman of xiaomi, Lei Jun, concurrently owns Shunwei Capital.，invested in a wide range of companies across almost every sector, including BYD, xiaopeng Motors, NIO, and others. This grants xiaomi significant influence in the supply chain.The main leaders of xiaomi's automotive project come from various major automotive companies. For instance, Yu Liguo, the former President of Beiqi Arcfox（BAIC Motor's new energy vehicle brand); Hu Zhengnan, the former Vice President of Geely Group and the Director of Geely Research Institute; Huang Zhenyu, the former Vice President of Magna China.
小米不仅仅是一家消费电子产品公司;它也是一家投资公司。小米董事长雷军同时拥有顺为资本。他投资了几乎所有行业的众多公司，包括比亚迪、小鹏汽车、蔚来汽车等。这赋予了小米在供应链上的重要影响力。小米汽车项目的主要负责人来自各大汽车公司。如北汽新能源汽车品牌，北汽Arcfox原总裁于立国;吉利集团原副总裁、吉利研究院院长胡正南;黄振宇，麦格纳中国原副总裁。
xiaomi is not just a consumer electronics company; it is also an investment firm. The Chairman of xiaomi, Lei Jun, concurrently owns Shunwei Capital.，invested in a wide range of companies across almost every sector, including BYD, xiaopeng Motors, NIO, and others. This grants xiaomi significant influence in the supply chain.The main leaders of xiaomi's automotive project come from various major automotive companies. For instance, Yu Liguo, the former President of Beiqi Arcfox（BAIC Motor's new energy vehicle brand); Hu Zhengnan, the former Vice President of Geely Group and the Director of Geely Research Institute; Huang Zhenyu, the former Vice President of Magna China.
小米不仅仅是一家消费电子产品公司;它也是一家投资公司。小米董事长雷军同时拥有顺为资本。他投资了几乎所有行业的众多公司，包括比亚迪、小鹏汽车、蔚来汽车等。这赋予了小米在供应链上的重要影响力。小米汽车项目的主要负责人来自各大汽车公司。如北汽新能源汽车品牌，北汽Arcfox原总裁于立国;吉利集团原副总裁、吉利研究院院长胡正南;黄振宇，麦格纳中国原副总裁。
@graytou
Will this be coming to Australia any time soon? Would rather this over the Seal.
它会很快来到澳大利亚吗?喜欢这个，不喜欢（比亚迪）海豹。
Will this be coming to Australia any time soon? Would rather this over the Seal.
它会很快来到澳大利亚吗?喜欢这个，不喜欢（比亚迪）海豹。
@monkeysuncle2816
You think $28,000 US is realistic for this much car, at this point in time? $56k is a bit much, but personally, I think 40-45 is pretty reasonable.
你觉得在当前，这种车卖28000美元可能吗?5.6万美元有点多了，我个人认为4万-4.5万美元是相当合理的。
You think $28,000 US is realistic for this much car, at this point in time? $56k is a bit much, but personally, I think 40-45 is pretty reasonable.
你觉得在当前，这种车卖28000美元可能吗?5.6万美元有点多了，我个人认为4万-4.5万美元是相当合理的。
@stevenjones916
Front end looks like a McLaren and the rear looks like an RX7.
前端看起来像迈凯轮（McLaren），尾部看起来像RX7。
Front end looks like a McLaren and the rear looks like an RX7.
前端看起来像迈凯轮（McLaren），尾部看起来像RX7。
@liamventer
100 kWh doesn't seem enough for 800 km of range. NMC batteries seem a step backwards. They are what the Nissan Leaf used and have more thermal runaway issues compared to LFP batteries that Tesla currently get from CATL, that don't use Nickel and Cobalt.
Getting away from the need to mine cobalt and nickel is a positive thing.
100 千瓦时似乎不够 800 公里的续航里程。NMC 电池似乎是一种倒退。与特斯拉目前从宁德时代(CATL)获得的不使用镍和钴的 LFP 电池相比，日产聆风使用的 NMC 电池存在更多的热失控问题。
不用开采钴和镍，是一件积极的事情。
100 kWh doesn't seem enough for 800 km of range. NMC batteries seem a step backwards. They are what the Nissan Leaf used and have more thermal runaway issues compared to LFP batteries that Tesla currently get from CATL, that don't use Nickel and Cobalt.
Getting away from the need to mine cobalt and nickel is a positive thing.
100 千瓦时似乎不够 800 公里的续航里程。NMC 电池似乎是一种倒退。与特斯拉目前从宁德时代(CATL)获得的不使用镍和钴的 LFP 电池相比，日产聆风使用的 NMC 电池存在更多的热失控问题。
不用开采钴和镍，是一件积极的事情。
@tedchandran
Jai Hinuja. If xiaomi car can pass the discerning Indian consumers like their xiaomi phones, our well off Indian families will consider to buy the SU7
如果小米汽车能像小米手机一样征服挑剔的印度消费者，我们印度的富裕家庭也会考虑购买小米的SU7电动车。
Jai Hinuja. If xiaomi car can pass the discerning Indian consumers like their xiaomi phones, our well off Indian families will consider to buy the SU7
如果小米汽车能像小米手机一样征服挑剔的印度消费者，我们印度的富裕家庭也会考虑购买小米的SU7电动车。
@stevencole7331
What I find interesting is how easy it seems to be to bring an EV to market . The automotive ice industry is hard to get into . It's been awhile to see a new player in that industry. It seems like we see a new EV maker come along as a common place from companies that have no automotive experience .
I think it shows how easy it is to develope and produce an EV . With so many in the space we should see the technology improve quickly and prices should drop below ice vehicles in short order .
我觉得有趣的是，将电动汽车推向市场似乎很容易。传统汽车公司很难进入。我们已经有一段时间没有看到该行业出现新的参与者了。新的电动汽车制造商似乎很常见，它们都是来自没有汽车行业经验的公司。
我认为，这说明开发和生产电动汽车是多么地容易。有这么多企业进入这一领域，我们应该看到技术的快速进步，价格也会在短时间内降到传统汽车以下。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
What I find interesting is how easy it seems to be to bring an EV to market . The automotive ice industry is hard to get into . It's been awhile to see a new player in that industry. It seems like we see a new EV maker come along as a common place from companies that have no automotive experience .
I think it shows how easy it is to develope and produce an EV . With so many in the space we should see the technology improve quickly and prices should drop below ice vehicles in short order .
我觉得有趣的是，将电动汽车推向市场似乎很容易。传统汽车公司很难进入。我们已经有一段时间没有看到该行业出现新的参与者了。新的电动汽车制造商似乎很常见，它们都是来自没有汽车行业经验的公司。
我认为，这说明开发和生产电动汽车是多么地容易。有这么多企业进入这一领域，我们应该看到技术的快速进步，价格也会在短时间内降到传统汽车以下。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@stevencole7331
@douglaswatt1582
China had foreign automakers partner with them for 25 years or longer and have not had a Chinese ice automaker sell outside of China and the foreign companies were top dogs in China
Then came along EVs and they took the market by storm . Foreign automakers did not have EVs . Tesla was it but Tesla was not required to partner with a Chinese company like other foreign companies have to .
In general they figured it out for the most part . EVs have allot less parts over ice . In theory it's a simple form of propulsion . Technically it's a glorified electric golf cart . Combustion engines and transmissions are far more complex
中国与外国汽车制造商合作了25年或更长时间，没有一家中国汽车制造商在中国以外销售汽车，外国公司在中国是领头羊。
然后，电动汽车出现了，并在市场上掀起了一场风暴。外国汽车制造商没有电动汽车。特斯拉就是其中之一，但特斯拉无需像其他外国公司那样与中国公司合作。
总的来说，他们在很大程度上解决了这个问题。电动汽车比传统汽车的零部件要少得多。理论上，这是一种更简单的推进系统。从技术上讲，这就是一辆豪华的电动高尔夫球车。内燃机和变速器要复杂得多。
@douglaswatt1582
China had foreign automakers partner with them for 25 years or longer and have not had a Chinese ice automaker sell outside of China and the foreign companies were top dogs in China
Then came along EVs and they took the market by storm . Foreign automakers did not have EVs . Tesla was it but Tesla was not required to partner with a Chinese company like other foreign companies have to .
In general they figured it out for the most part . EVs have allot less parts over ice . In theory it's a simple form of propulsion . Technically it's a glorified electric golf cart . Combustion engines and transmissions are far more complex
中国与外国汽车制造商合作了25年或更长时间，没有一家中国汽车制造商在中国以外销售汽车，外国公司在中国是领头羊。
然后，电动汽车出现了，并在市场上掀起了一场风暴。外国汽车制造商没有电动汽车。特斯拉就是其中之一，但特斯拉无需像其他外国公司那样与中国公司合作。
总的来说，他们在很大程度上解决了这个问题。电动汽车比传统汽车的零部件要少得多。理论上，这是一种更简单的推进系统。从技术上讲，这就是一辆豪华的电动高尔夫球车。内燃机和变速器要复杂得多。
@jasonmugridge
From what we've seen of China its not hard to find a manufacturer who would produce this car for them and then they can add their technical know how. Do this initially until they get enough sales and then build/buy their own factory.
根据我们对中国的了解，要找到一家能为他们生产这款汽车的制造商并不难，然后他们就可以从中学到技术。先这样做，直到他们获得足够的销量，再建立/购买自己的工厂。
From what we've seen of China its not hard to find a manufacturer who would produce this car for them and then they can add their technical know how. Do this initially until they get enough sales and then build/buy their own factory.
根据我们对中国的了解，要找到一家能为他们生产这款汽车的制造商并不难，然后他们就可以从中学到技术。先这样做，直到他们获得足够的销量，再建立/购买自己的工厂。
@kenbehrens5778
Steve. It's China speed. Certainly not exclusive to that country. What is the difference is the determination and support of government policy, backing up and working with private companies. They call it win win. It seems to work in the auto industry. 101,000 more charging poles in the country in November 2023 alone.
史蒂夫，这是中国速度。当然，这并非中国独有。不同之处在于政府的政策，以及对私营公司的支持。他们称之为双赢。这在汽车行业似乎行之有效。仅在 2023 年 11 月，中国就增加了 10万1000 个充电桩。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Steve. It's China speed. Certainly not exclusive to that country. What is the difference is the determination and support of government policy, backing up and working with private companies. They call it win win. It seems to work in the auto industry. 101,000 more charging poles in the country in November 2023 alone.
史蒂夫，这是中国速度。当然，这并非中国独有。不同之处在于政府的政策，以及对私营公司的支持。他们称之为双赢。这在汽车行业似乎行之有效。仅在 2023 年 11 月，中国就增加了 10万1000 个充电桩。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@TerminatorMod101
it may seems easy for the layman, but it is not, apple ev is dead in the water spoke for itself
对外行人来说，造车似乎很容易，但事实并非如此，比如苹果电动车就搞砸了。
it may seems easy for the layman, but it is not, apple ev is dead in the water spoke for itself
对外行人来说，造车似乎很容易，但事实并非如此，比如苹果电动车就搞砸了。
@MrKilekico
If you ever bought this, just change that MI badge with Maserati trident . Damn good looking car
如果你买了这款车，把小米徽章换成玛莎拉蒂的三叉戟。这车也太好看了
If you ever bought this, just change that MI badge with Maserati trident . Damn good looking car
如果你买了这款车，把小米徽章换成玛莎拉蒂的三叉戟。这车也太好看了
@ChinaSongsCollection
@0:17. I guess you haven't yet watched videos of the latest Huawei powered EVs (such as AITO, LUXEED, and AVATR 12).
They are clearly ahead of Tesla in the area of autonomous driving. xiaomi is only catching up to them.
--------------
@6:47. The Huawei powered cars already can do exactly that.
That is, the car goes find parking itself, parks the car. And then when you finish your shopping, you click a button on the Huawei app on your phone, and the car will come and find you.
-------------
The only difference here is the Huawei cars are ALREADY in the market. People have already been driving them.
xiaomi is a late newcomer onto the scene offering the same functions.
@0:17. 我猜你还没有看过最新的华为电动汽车（如 AITO、LUXEED 和 AVATR 12）的视频。
他们在自动驾驶领域明显领先于特斯拉。小米只是在追赶他们。
@6:47. 华为汽车已经可以做到这一点。
也就是说，汽车自己去找停车场，把车停好。当你购物结束后，在手机上点击华为应用程序上的一个按钮，汽车就会来找你。
唯一不同的是，华为汽车已经进入市场，人们已经在驾驶它们了。而小米则是后来者，也提供同样的功能。
@0:17. I guess you haven't yet watched videos of the latest Huawei powered EVs (such as AITO, LUXEED, and AVATR 12).
They are clearly ahead of Tesla in the area of autonomous driving. xiaomi is only catching up to them.
--------------
@6:47. The Huawei powered cars already can do exactly that.
That is, the car goes find parking itself, parks the car. And then when you finish your shopping, you click a button on the Huawei app on your phone, and the car will come and find you.
-------------
The only difference here is the Huawei cars are ALREADY in the market. People have already been driving them.
xiaomi is a late newcomer onto the scene offering the same functions.
@0:17. 我猜你还没有看过最新的华为电动汽车（如 AITO、LUXEED 和 AVATR 12）的视频。
他们在自动驾驶领域明显领先于特斯拉。小米只是在追赶他们。
@6:47. 华为汽车已经可以做到这一点。
也就是说，汽车自己去找停车场，把车停好。当你购物结束后，在手机上点击华为应用程序上的一个按钮，汽车就会来找你。
唯一不同的是，华为汽车已经进入市场，人们已经在驾驶它们了。而小米则是后来者，也提供同样的功能。
很赞 18
收藏