英国国会议员敦促禁止16岁以下青少年使用智能手机，并在学校实施法定禁令
正文翻译
(The report cited research showing a 52% increase in children’s screen time between 2020 and 2022 and a study showing nearly 25% of children use smartphones in an addictive manner.)
（该报告引用了一项研究，该研究显示，2020年至2022年间，儿童的屏幕时间增加了52%，另有一项研究显示，近25%的儿童对智能手机上瘾。）
新闻：
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
MPs urge under-16s UK smartphone ban and statutory ban in schools
-Commons education committee chair says online world poses serious dangers and parents face uphill struggle
英国国会议员敦促禁止16岁以下青少年使用智能手机，并在学校实施法定禁令
——下议院教育委员会主席表示，网络世界带来了严重的危险，家长们面临着艰难的斗争
-Commons education committee chair says online world poses serious dangers and parents face uphill struggle
英国国会议员敦促禁止16岁以下青少年使用智能手机，并在学校实施法定禁令
——下议院教育委员会主席表示，网络世界带来了严重的危险，家长们面临着艰难的斗争
(The report cited research showing a 52% increase in children’s screen time between 2020 and 2022 and a study showing nearly 25% of children use smartphones in an addictive manner.)
（该报告引用了一项研究，该研究显示，2020年至2022年间，儿童的屏幕时间增加了52%，另有一项研究显示，近25%的儿童对智能手机上瘾。）
新闻：
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
MPs have urged the next government to consider a total ban on smartphones for under 16-year-olds and a statutory ban on mobile phone use in schools as part of a crackdown on screen time for children.
英国国会议员敦促下一届政府考虑全面禁止16岁以下青少年使用智能手机，并立法禁止在学校使用手机，作为遏制儿童屏幕时间的一部分。
英国国会议员敦促下一届政府考虑全面禁止16岁以下青少年使用智能手机，并立法禁止在学校使用手机，作为遏制儿童屏幕时间的一部分。
Members of the House of Commons education committee made the recommendations in a report into the impact of screen time on education and wellbeing, which also called on ministers to raise the threshold for opening a social media account to 16.
英国下议院教育委员会的成员在一份关于屏幕时间对教育和福祉影响的报告中提出了这些建议，该报告还呼吁大臣们将开设社交媒体账户的门槛提高到16岁。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
英国下议院教育委员会的成员在一份关于屏幕时间对教育和福祉影响的报告中提出了这些建议，该报告还呼吁大臣们将开设社交媒体账户的门槛提高到16岁。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Robin Walker MP, the Conservative chair of the committee, said excessive screen and smartphone use had a “clear negative impact” on the wellbeing of children and young people.
该委员会主席、保守党议员罗宾·沃克表示，过度使用屏幕和智能手机对儿童和年轻人的健康有“明显的负面影响”。
该委员会主席、保守党议员罗宾·沃克表示，过度使用屏幕和智能手机对儿童和年轻人的健康有“明显的负面影响”。
Walker said: “From exposure to pornography, to criminal gangs using online platforms to recruit children, the online world poses serious dangers. Parents and schools face an uphill struggle and government must do more to help them meet this challenge. This might require radical steps, such as potentially a ban on smartphones for under-16s.”
沃克说：“从接触色情内容，到犯罪团伙利用网络平台招募儿童，网络世界构成了严重的危险。家长和学校面临着艰难的斗争，政府必须采取更多措施来帮助他们应对这一挑战。这可能需要采取激进的措施，比如可能禁止16岁以下青少年使用智能手机。”
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
沃克说：“从接触色情内容，到犯罪团伙利用网络平台招募儿童，网络世界构成了严重的危险。家长和学校面临着艰难的斗争，政府必须采取更多措施来帮助他们应对这一挑战。这可能需要采取激进的措施，比如可能禁止16岁以下青少年使用智能手机。”
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Rishi Sunak has been weighing a ban on selling smartphones to under-16s, as well as raising the minimum age for social media accounts, but a planned consultation on the proposals has not been published.
苏纳克一直在考虑禁止向16岁以下的青少年出售智能手机，以及提高社交媒体账户的最低年龄，但有关这些提议的计划咨询尚未公布。
苏纳克一直在考虑禁止向16岁以下的青少年出售智能手机，以及提高社交媒体账户的最低年龄，但有关这些提议的计划咨询尚未公布。
The education committee report said the next government should work with Ofcom, the communications regulator, to launch a consultation on new measures for use of smartphones – handsets that allow people to easily download apps and view websites. These would include: a “total” ban of smartphones for children under 16; parental controls installed on phones by default; and controls in app stores to prevent children from accessing inappropriate content.
教育委员会的报告称，下一届政府应与通信监管机构英国通信管理局合作，就可以让人们轻松下载应用程序和浏览网站的智能手机使用的新措施展开磋商。这些措施包括：“全面”禁止16岁以下儿童使用智能手机；手机默认安装家长控制；以及应用商店中的控制，以防止儿童访问不适当的内容。
教育委员会的报告称，下一届政府应与通信监管机构英国通信管理局合作，就可以让人们轻松下载应用程序和浏览网站的智能手机使用的新措施展开磋商。这些措施包括：“全面”禁止16岁以下儿童使用智能手机；手机默认安装家长控制；以及应用商店中的控制，以防止儿童访问不适当的内容。
The report also says the government should consider enshrining in law a ban on mobile phone use in schools in England. In February ministers issued guidance for headteachers that “prohibits the use of mobile phones” throughout the school day.
该报告还表示，政府应该考虑将禁止在英国学校使用手机的禁令写入法律。今年2月，大臣们向校长发布了指导意见，禁止在校期间“使用手机”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
该报告还表示，政府应该考虑将禁止在英国学校使用手机的禁令写入法律。今年2月，大臣们向校长发布了指导意见，禁止在校期间“使用手机”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The report called for a formal monitoring regime to gauge the impact of the ban and to keep in reserve the option of making it statutory. “If results show that a non-statutory ban has been ineffective in 12 months, the government must move swiftly to introduce a statutory ban,” said the report.
该报告呼吁建立一个正式的监督机制，以评估禁令的影响，并保留使其成为法定的选择。报告称：“如果结果显示，一项非法定禁令在12个月内无效，那么政府必须迅速采取行动，推出一项法定禁令。”
该报告呼吁建立一个正式的监督机制，以评估禁令的影响，并保留使其成为法定的选择。报告称：“如果结果显示，一项非法定禁令在12个月内无效，那么政府必须迅速采取行动，推出一项法定禁令。”
The report added that the next government must launch a consultation before the end of 2024 on whether 13 is an appropriate age for children to allow social media platforms to access their personal data online – and open a social media account. The minimum age for opening an account on most major platforms in the UK is 13.
该报告补充说，下一届政府必须在2024年底之前启动一项咨询，讨论13岁的用户是否适合允许社交媒体平台在线访问他们的个人数据，并开设社交媒体账户。在英国大多数主要平台上开户的最低年龄是13岁。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
该报告补充说，下一届政府必须在2024年底之前启动一项咨询，讨论13岁的用户是否适合允许社交媒体平台在线访问他们的个人数据，并开设社交媒体账户。在英国大多数主要平台上开户的最低年龄是13岁。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Pointing out that the age of consent in the UK is 16, that a child cannot drive until they are 17, and that the voting threshold in England is 18, the report added: “The next government should recommend 16 as a more appropriate age [for the age of digital consent].”
报告指出，英国的法定年龄是16岁，儿童要到17岁才能开车，而英格兰的投票门槛是18岁。报告补充说：“下一届政府应该建议将16岁作为（数字同意年龄）更合适的年龄。”
报告指出，英国的法定年龄是16岁，儿童要到17岁才能开车，而英格兰的投票门槛是18岁。报告补充说：“下一届政府应该建议将16岁作为（数字同意年龄）更合适的年龄。”
The report cited research showing a 52% increase in children’s screen time between 2020 and 2022 and a study showing nearly 25% of children and young people use their smartphones in an addictive manner. It also flagged research from the children’s commissioner for England showing that 79% of children had encountered violent pornography online before the age of 18.
该报告引用了一项研究，该研究显示，2020年至2022年期间，儿童的屏幕时间增加了52%，另有一项研究显示，近25%的儿童和年轻人对智能手机的使用上瘾。该报告还指出，英国儿童事务专员的研究表明，79%的儿童在18岁之前在网上接触过暴力色情内容。
该报告引用了一项研究，该研究显示，2020年至2022年期间，儿童的屏幕时间增加了52%，另有一项研究显示，近25%的儿童和年轻人对智能手机的使用上瘾。该报告还指出，英国儿童事务专员的研究表明，79%的儿童在18岁之前在网上接触过暴力色情内容。
Ofcom reported recently that a quarter of three- and four-year-olds in the UK now own a smartphone, with nearly all children owning a mobile by the age of 12. The communications regulator also found that half of children under 13 are on social media.
英国通信管理局最近报告称，英国三、四岁的孩子中有四分之一拥有智能手机，几乎所有12岁的孩子都拥有一部手机。通信监管机构还发现，13岁以下的儿童中有一半在使用社交媒体。
英国通信管理局最近报告称，英国三、四岁的孩子中有四分之一拥有智能手机，几乎所有12岁的孩子都拥有一部手机。通信监管机构还发现，13岁以下的儿童中有一半在使用社交媒体。
The MPs said: “The overwhelming weight of evidence submitted to us suggests that the harms of screen time and social media use significantly outweigh the benefits for young children.”
议员们表示：“提交给我们的大量证据表明，看屏幕时间和使用社交媒体对幼儿的危害远远大于益处。”
议员们表示：“提交给我们的大量证据表明，看屏幕时间和使用社交媒体对幼儿的危害远远大于益处。”
Smartphone Free Childhood, a campaign group calling for handset restrictions, welcomed the report. “It’s hugely encouraging to see this influential committee, who have heard a wide range of evidence from experts across education and child development, coming to the same conclusion as our grassroots community of 100,000 parents,” said Daisy Greenwell, the group’s co-founder.
呼吁限制手机使用的活动组织“智能手机自由童年”对该报告表示欢迎。该组织的联合创始人黛西·格林威尔说：“这个有影响力的委员会听取了来自教育和儿童发展领域专家的广泛证据，得出了与我们10万名基层家长相同的结论，这非常令人鼓舞。”
呼吁限制手机使用的活动组织“智能手机自由童年”对该报告表示欢迎。该组织的联合创始人黛西·格林威尔说：“这个有影响力的委员会听取了来自教育和儿童发展领域专家的广泛证据，得出了与我们10万名基层家长相同的结论，这非常令人鼓舞。”
Ian Russell, the chair of the Molly Rose Foundation and whose 14-year-old daughter Molly took her own life after viewing harmful material on social media, said the next government should concentrate on regulation and not bans that could deliver “worse outcomes”.
莫莉·罗斯基金会主席伊恩·罗素表示，下一届政府应该专注于监管，而不是可能带来“更糟糕结果”的禁令。他14岁的女儿莫莉在看到社交媒体上的有害内容后自杀了。
莫莉·罗斯基金会主席伊恩·罗素表示，下一届政府应该专注于监管，而不是可能带来“更糟糕结果”的禁令。他14岁的女儿莫莉在看到社交媒体上的有害内容后自杀了。
He said: “Smartphone and social media bans would cause more harm than good and punish children for the failures of tech companies to protect them. The next government must follow the evidence and deliver stronger regulation.”
他说：“智能手机和社交媒体禁令弊大于利，会因为科技公司未能保护孩子不去惩罚公司而惩罚孩子们。下一届政府必须遵循证据，实施更强有力的监管。”
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
他说：“智能手机和社交媒体禁令弊大于利，会因为科技公司未能保护孩子不去惩罚公司而惩罚孩子们。下一届政府必须遵循证据，实施更强有力的监管。”
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
评论翻译
CrispyDave
I'm sure the kids will explode if you ban them in school, but it's not the worst idea I've heard. I can see more drawbacks than benefits to everyone having them all the time.
I'm not sure banning under 16s generally is realistic at all though.
我相信如果你在学校里禁止手机，孩子们会炸锅的，但这不是我听过的最糟糕的主意。我可以看到每个人一直拿着它们的缺点比好处更多。
不过，我不确定禁止16岁以下的青少年用手机是否现实。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I'm sure the kids will explode if you ban them in school, but it's not the worst idea I've heard. I can see more drawbacks than benefits to everyone having them all the time.
I'm not sure banning under 16s generally is realistic at all though.
我相信如果你在学校里禁止手机，孩子们会炸锅的，但这不是我听过的最糟糕的主意。我可以看到每个人一直拿着它们的缺点比好处更多。
不过，我不确定禁止16岁以下的青少年用手机是否现实。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
WillistheWillow
It is realistic in schools and should definitely be done.
这在学校是现实的，绝对应该这样做。
It is realistic in schools and should definitely be done.
这在学校是现实的，绝对应该这样做。
Mrbrownlove
Already done in my lad’s school. They also seem to have a weird blocker in place in The building where there is no access to mobile data, so you can only use the school’s WiFi, and that requires authorisation beyond just knowing the password. It’s pretty boring when you have to wait in reception for ages.
They got hacked and ransomewared just after lockdown so I assume it’s to prevent that happening again rather than to protect students.
在我孩子的学校里已经做过了。他们似乎还在大楼里安装了一个奇怪的屏障，那里没有移动数据接入，所以你只能使用学校的WiFi，而这不仅需要知道密码，还需要授权。当你不得不在接待处等很长时间的时候，这是相当无聊的。
他们在封锁后被黑客攻击和勒索，所以我认为这是为了防止此类事件再次发生，而不是保护学生。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Already done in my lad’s school. They also seem to have a weird blocker in place in The building where there is no access to mobile data, so you can only use the school’s WiFi, and that requires authorisation beyond just knowing the password. It’s pretty boring when you have to wait in reception for ages.
They got hacked and ransomewared just after lockdown so I assume it’s to prevent that happening again rather than to protect students.
在我孩子的学校里已经做过了。他们似乎还在大楼里安装了一个奇怪的屏障，那里没有移动数据接入，所以你只能使用学校的WiFi，而这不仅需要知道密码，还需要授权。当你不得不在接待处等很长时间的时候，这是相当无聊的。
他们在封锁后被黑客攻击和勒索，所以我认为这是为了防止此类事件再次发生，而不是保护学生。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
donoteatshrimp
The kids won't explode. The fucking parents will. It's the PARENTS that need to be in contact with little Timmy every second of every day that cause just as many problems as Timmy playing clash of clans in his lap. Because little Timmy will text mummy complaining about something and 10 minutes later she's at the door giving the poor receptionist hell wanting to speak to the headteacher immediately. We've had parents facetime their kids phones to yell at the fucking teacher in the middle of class. It's insanity.
孩子们不会炸锅的。但tmd父母会。父母每天每分每秒都需要与小蒂米保持联系，这就像蒂米在膝盖上玩《部落冲突》一样，会带来很多问题。因为小蒂米会发短信给妈妈抱怨一些事情，十分钟后她就会站在门口，对可怜的接待员臭骂一通，想马上和校长说话。我们有家长在课堂上用视频通话让孩子的手机屏对着老师大喊大叫。这就是精神错乱。
The kids won't explode. The fucking parents will. It's the PARENTS that need to be in contact with little Timmy every second of every day that cause just as many problems as Timmy playing clash of clans in his lap. Because little Timmy will text mummy complaining about something and 10 minutes later she's at the door giving the poor receptionist hell wanting to speak to the headteacher immediately. We've had parents facetime their kids phones to yell at the fucking teacher in the middle of class. It's insanity.
孩子们不会炸锅的。但tmd父母会。父母每天每分每秒都需要与小蒂米保持联系，这就像蒂米在膝盖上玩《部落冲突》一样，会带来很多问题。因为小蒂米会发短信给妈妈抱怨一些事情，十分钟后她就会站在门口，对可怜的接待员臭骂一通，想马上和校长说话。我们有家长在课堂上用视频通话让孩子的手机屏对着老师大喊大叫。这就是精神错乱。
Leading-Ice4487
Well this problem is two fold, sounds like you work in a school and are desensitised to the issues that arise from negligence in schools. Yes absolutely wrong for a child to face time and scream at a teacher in the middle of class. Equally from my own personal experiences teachers and admin seem to try and hide their failings and issues that arise from children being in school, So yes there should be no issue with any parent being able to reach their child if issues are present in school particularly as by the time most schools decide to do something about it it’s too late.
好吧，这个问题是双重的，听起来你在学校工作，对学校疏忽引起的问题不敏感。是的，一个孩子在课堂上对老师大喊大叫绝对是错误的。同样，从我个人的经验来看，老师和管理人员似乎试图隐藏他们的失败和孩子在学校产生的问题，所以是的，如果孩子在学校出现问题，任何家长都应该能够接触到他们的孩子，尤其是当大多数学校决定采取措施时，已经太晚了。
Well this problem is two fold, sounds like you work in a school and are desensitised to the issues that arise from negligence in schools. Yes absolutely wrong for a child to face time and scream at a teacher in the middle of class. Equally from my own personal experiences teachers and admin seem to try and hide their failings and issues that arise from children being in school, So yes there should be no issue with any parent being able to reach their child if issues are present in school particularly as by the time most schools decide to do something about it it’s too late.
好吧，这个问题是双重的，听起来你在学校工作，对学校疏忽引起的问题不敏感。是的，一个孩子在课堂上对老师大喊大叫绝对是错误的。同样，从我个人的经验来看，老师和管理人员似乎试图隐藏他们的失败和孩子在学校产生的问题，所以是的，如果孩子在学校出现问题，任何家长都应该能够接触到他们的孩子，尤其是当大多数学校决定采取措施时，已经太晚了。
yetanotherweebgirl
In schools I can understand, but a general ban is an authoritarian overreach to undermine young people’s access to information that would help them make more informed decisions, especially in terms of who to vote for should Labour get in and actually lower voting age to 16.
Banning smart phones for under 16’s could then be argued to be a desperate attempt to cultivate a new uninformed generation who are susceptible to MSM biases and whatever narratives the state want the public to believe or rally behind. Thats exactly the type of ignorance and misinformation which combined to result in the ill informed brexit and subsequent economic and cultural nosedive we’ve been in ever since. Had people had the kind of widespread access to unfiltered information we have now back then, I feel its unlikely as many would have been taken in by the lies and machinations of UK media, as they’d have better access to unadulterated foreign viewpoints.
This seems like an attempt to wrest back the control over the masses that the ruling classes have been slowly losing over the last 15-20 years between better informed youth and the decline in influence of state religions.
The ruling classes have historically always hated when the peasants are smart enough to realise they’re being used. Better to keep them in the dark with such authoritarian policies
在学校里，我能理解，但全面禁令是一种威权主义的越权行为，它破坏了年轻人获取信息的机会，而这些信息本可以帮助他们做出更明智的决定，尤其是在工党当选并将投票年龄降至16岁的情况下，他们应该投票给谁。
因此，禁止16岁以下青少年使用智能手机可能会被认为是一种孤注一篑的尝试，目的是培养不知情的新一代，这些人容易受到主流媒体的偏见和国家希望公众相信或支持的任何叙事的影响。正是这种无知和错误信息导致了英国脱欧以及随后的经济和文化暴跌。如果当时人们能像现在这样广泛地接触到未经过滤的信息，我觉得不太可能有那么多人被英国媒体的谎言和阴谋所欺骗，因为他们能更好地接触到纯粹的外国观点。
这似乎是试图夺回统治阶级在过去15-20年里逐渐失去的对大众的控制，这些控制是在受过更好教育的年轻人和国家宗教影响力的下降之间慢慢失去的。
统治阶级历来痛恨农民聪明地意识到自己被利用了。最好让他们对这种专制政策一无所知（愚民政策）
In schools I can understand, but a general ban is an authoritarian overreach to undermine young people’s access to information that would help them make more informed decisions, especially in terms of who to vote for should Labour get in and actually lower voting age to 16.
Banning smart phones for under 16’s could then be argued to be a desperate attempt to cultivate a new uninformed generation who are susceptible to MSM biases and whatever narratives the state want the public to believe or rally behind. Thats exactly the type of ignorance and misinformation which combined to result in the ill informed brexit and subsequent economic and cultural nosedive we’ve been in ever since. Had people had the kind of widespread access to unfiltered information we have now back then, I feel its unlikely as many would have been taken in by the lies and machinations of UK media, as they’d have better access to unadulterated foreign viewpoints.
This seems like an attempt to wrest back the control over the masses that the ruling classes have been slowly losing over the last 15-20 years between better informed youth and the decline in influence of state religions.
The ruling classes have historically always hated when the peasants are smart enough to realise they’re being used. Better to keep them in the dark with such authoritarian policies
在学校里，我能理解，但全面禁令是一种威权主义的越权行为，它破坏了年轻人获取信息的机会，而这些信息本可以帮助他们做出更明智的决定，尤其是在工党当选并将投票年龄降至16岁的情况下，他们应该投票给谁。
因此，禁止16岁以下青少年使用智能手机可能会被认为是一种孤注一篑的尝试，目的是培养不知情的新一代，这些人容易受到主流媒体的偏见和国家希望公众相信或支持的任何叙事的影响。正是这种无知和错误信息导致了英国脱欧以及随后的经济和文化暴跌。如果当时人们能像现在这样广泛地接触到未经过滤的信息，我觉得不太可能有那么多人被英国媒体的谎言和阴谋所欺骗，因为他们能更好地接触到纯粹的外国观点。
这似乎是试图夺回统治阶级在过去15-20年里逐渐失去的对大众的控制，这些控制是在受过更好教育的年轻人和国家宗教影响力的下降之间慢慢失去的。
统治阶级历来痛恨农民聪明地意识到自己被利用了。最好让他们对这种专制政策一无所知（愚民政策）
nedjer1
There is evidence of negative effects and positive effects. For many of the poorest kids access to the Internet is the only IT they have to support them with homework/ their studies so there is a considerable risk of chucking out the baby with the bathwater. Most of the anger I see online is from 'adults' and 'adults' failure to regulate social media companies known to be harming kids. Perhaps the 'adults' should put their own house in order rather than leaning on kids' use of social media as cover for the range of factors causing mental health problems, including poverty, lack of access to mental health support and schools made of melting concrete?
有证据表明有消极影响也有积极影响。对于许多最贫穷的孩子来说，互联网是他们唯一能支持他们做作业/学习的信息技术，所以有相当大的风险是（这个禁令会）把孩子连同洗澡水一起倒掉。我在网上看到的大多数愤怒都来自于“成年人”，并且“成年人”未能监管那些已知会伤害孩子的社交媒体公司。也许“成年人”应该把自己的事情处理好，而不是依靠“孩子们使用社交媒体”来掩盖导致心理健康问题的一系列因素，包括贫困、缺乏获得心理健康支持的渠道和由融化的混凝土建造的学校。
There is evidence of negative effects and positive effects. For many of the poorest kids access to the Internet is the only IT they have to support them with homework/ their studies so there is a considerable risk of chucking out the baby with the bathwater. Most of the anger I see online is from 'adults' and 'adults' failure to regulate social media companies known to be harming kids. Perhaps the 'adults' should put their own house in order rather than leaning on kids' use of social media as cover for the range of factors causing mental health problems, including poverty, lack of access to mental health support and schools made of melting concrete?
有证据表明有消极影响也有积极影响。对于许多最贫穷的孩子来说，互联网是他们唯一能支持他们做作业/学习的信息技术，所以有相当大的风险是（这个禁令会）把孩子连同洗澡水一起倒掉。我在网上看到的大多数愤怒都来自于“成年人”，并且“成年人”未能监管那些已知会伤害孩子的社交媒体公司。也许“成年人”应该把自己的事情处理好，而不是依靠“孩子们使用社交媒体”来掩盖导致心理健康问题的一系列因素，包括贫困、缺乏获得心理健康支持的渠道和由融化的混凝土建造的学校。
leclercwitch
When I was in high school 2007-2012, any phones out during school time would be confiscated immediately. It shouldn’t have changed! Don’t schools provide tech to students nowadays if it’s required? Surely those devices have strict blockers on them.
I get that phones are needed these days, but I’m not allowed mine at work, emergency calls are always allowed, and internet access is available with blocks. Schools shouldn’t be any different, there’s a time and a place. Kids don’t need to be attached to their phones all hours of the day.
2007-2012年我在高中的时候，任何在上课时间拿出来的手机都会被立即没收。这规矩不应该改变！如果需要的话，现在学校不给学生提供相关技术吗？当然，这些设备上有严格的拦截器。
我知道现在需要手机，但我不允许在工作时使用手机，紧急电话总是允许的，互联网接入是有阻拦的。学校也不应该有什么不同，这是有时间和地点的。孩子们不需要整天都盯着手机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
When I was in high school 2007-2012, any phones out during school time would be confiscated immediately. It shouldn’t have changed! Don’t schools provide tech to students nowadays if it’s required? Surely those devices have strict blockers on them.
I get that phones are needed these days, but I’m not allowed mine at work, emergency calls are always allowed, and internet access is available with blocks. Schools shouldn’t be any different, there’s a time and a place. Kids don’t need to be attached to their phones all hours of the day.
2007-2012年我在高中的时候，任何在上课时间拿出来的手机都会被立即没收。这规矩不应该改变！如果需要的话，现在学校不给学生提供相关技术吗？当然，这些设备上有严格的拦截器。
我知道现在需要手机，但我不允许在工作时使用手机，紧急电话总是允许的，互联网接入是有阻拦的。学校也不应该有什么不同，这是有时间和地点的。孩子们不需要整天都盯着手机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
RainbowRedYellow
There are legitimate reasons for someone under 16 to have a phone for example keeping in contact with their parents should they need a lift home. Begin able to access certain websites is now essential for services, paying for good often needs a smartphone young teens don't have bankcards and alot of places won't accept cash for goodness sake.
It's pretty funny seeing how millennial men who make up the majority of this subreddit have rotted into hysterical authoritarians obsessed with banning everything that remotely scares them not unlike their own boomer parents. Like legitimately do they not live in the modern world and just pine for the 1990's now?
16岁以下的人拥有手机是有正当理由的，比如在他们需要搭车回家时与父母保持联系。现在能够访问某些网站对于服务来说是必不可少的，购买商品通常需要智能手机，青少年没有银行卡，而且很多地方都不接受现金。
很有趣的是，在红迪网上占大多数的千禧一代男性已经变成了歇斯底里的专制主义者，他们痴迷于禁止一切让他们害怕的东西，就像他们自己的婴儿潮一代的父母一样。难道他们不是生活在现代世界，只是怀念上世纪90年代吗？
There are legitimate reasons for someone under 16 to have a phone for example keeping in contact with their parents should they need a lift home. Begin able to access certain websites is now essential for services, paying for good often needs a smartphone young teens don't have bankcards and alot of places won't accept cash for goodness sake.
It's pretty funny seeing how millennial men who make up the majority of this subreddit have rotted into hysterical authoritarians obsessed with banning everything that remotely scares them not unlike their own boomer parents. Like legitimately do they not live in the modern world and just pine for the 1990's now?
16岁以下的人拥有手机是有正当理由的，比如在他们需要搭车回家时与父母保持联系。现在能够访问某些网站对于服务来说是必不可少的，购买商品通常需要智能手机，青少年没有银行卡，而且很多地方都不接受现金。
很有趣的是，在红迪网上占大多数的千禧一代男性已经变成了歇斯底里的专制主义者，他们痴迷于禁止一切让他们害怕的东西，就像他们自己的婴儿潮一代的父母一样。难道他们不是生活在现代世界，只是怀念上世纪90年代吗？
iwanttobeacavediverCounty Durham
I’d go one step further in schools and strip out all the technology. A school smartphone ban seems stupid when schools have then dropped absolutely eye watering amounts of money to put Chromebooks and iPads into children’s hands, often unnecessarily given they’re often used poorly. They end up being an expensive, hard to maintain gimmick that just adds another distraction to the school environment. Go back to learning with books and paper.
我会在学校里更进一步，去掉所有的科技。学校禁止使用智能手机似乎很愚蠢，因为学校已经投入了大量的资金，把（教学用的）chromebook和ipad交到孩子们手中，而考虑到孩子们经常使用不当，这往往是不必要的。他们最终成为了一个昂贵的，难以维持的噱头，只会增加另一个分散学校环境的注意力。应当回到书本和纸上学习。
I’d go one step further in schools and strip out all the technology. A school smartphone ban seems stupid when schools have then dropped absolutely eye watering amounts of money to put Chromebooks and iPads into children’s hands, often unnecessarily given they’re often used poorly. They end up being an expensive, hard to maintain gimmick that just adds another distraction to the school environment. Go back to learning with books and paper.
我会在学校里更进一步，去掉所有的科技。学校禁止使用智能手机似乎很愚蠢，因为学校已经投入了大量的资金，把（教学用的）chromebook和ipad交到孩子们手中，而考虑到孩子们经常使用不当，这往往是不必要的。他们最终成为了一个昂贵的，难以维持的噱头，只会增加另一个分散学校环境的注意力。应当回到书本和纸上学习。
Utheran
Strip out all the technology... Do you even know what technology is? You want to take out paper, books, pens, calculators, heck the building itself is technology. Why is the technology you dislike so much more dangerous than all that other technology?
This is a ridiculous take. Like saying we should ban paper since most students just doodle on it. In your words, using it poorly and adding another distraction to the learning environment.
去掉所有的技术……你知道什么是科技吗？你要拿出纸、书、笔、计算器，见鬼，建筑本身就是科技。为什么你不喜欢的技术比其他技术更危险？
这是一个荒谬的说法。比如说我们应该禁止用纸，因为大多数学生只是在纸上涂鸦。用你的话来说，就是用得不好，给学习环境增加了另一个干扰。
Strip out all the technology... Do you even know what technology is? You want to take out paper, books, pens, calculators, heck the building itself is technology. Why is the technology you dislike so much more dangerous than all that other technology?
This is a ridiculous take. Like saying we should ban paper since most students just doodle on it. In your words, using it poorly and adding another distraction to the learning environment.
去掉所有的技术……你知道什么是科技吗？你要拿出纸、书、笔、计算器，见鬼，建筑本身就是科技。为什么你不喜欢的技术比其他技术更危险？
这是一个荒谬的说法。比如说我们应该禁止用纸，因为大多数学生只是在纸上涂鸦。用你的话来说，就是用得不好，给学习环境增加了另一个干扰。
Creative_Total_2229
I bet you can't computer.
We have a generation kicking and screaming about being left behind as everything moves online and you want to ban technology in schools...
我打赌你不会用电脑。
随着一切都转移到网上，我们这一代人对自己被抛在后面而感到愤怒和尖叫，你还想在学校里禁止使用科技……
I bet you can't computer.
We have a generation kicking and screaming about being left behind as everything moves online and you want to ban technology in schools...
我打赌你不会用电脑。
随着一切都转移到网上，我们这一代人对自己被抛在后面而感到愤怒和尖叫，你还想在学校里禁止使用科技……
PropitiousNog
I would vote for any party if they were to implement a ban on smart phones at school. Zero need for a child to have a smart phone in school. If they have a problem, tell the teacher.
如果任何政党在学校禁止使用智能手机，我都会投票给他们。孩子在学校不需要智能手机。如果他们有问题，去告诉老师。
I would vote for any party if they were to implement a ban on smart phones at school. Zero need for a child to have a smart phone in school. If they have a problem, tell the teacher.
如果任何政党在学校禁止使用智能手机，我都会投票给他们。孩子在学校不需要智能手机。如果他们有问题，去告诉老师。
很赞 7
收藏