嫦6带着月背样本回来了
2024-06-30 周而不比 10088
正文翻译
嫦娥6返回的新闻


评论翻译
Vladislaw 3 days ago edited
Congrats to the team. Hope it lights some fires in congress and NASA

恭喜,希望这能刺激到国会和NASA

Ostpol Vladislaw
3 days ago edited
Thats not how it works. Now that Americans have that HD video of falling first stage near the village, the Americans are going to tingle their wingles to it for no end, calmed down and convinced that China is far behind and thinking that nothing has to be done. Believe me, i interacted with Americans here and everywhere. Thats all they need to relax and do nothing. There won't be any Sputnik moment, because Americans are going to blow their load on that video and become all eepy sleepy.

不会起作用的。现在美国人看了那个第一级坠落在村庄的视频(谣言,外网有一段国内火箭第一级坠落的视频)就会嗨起来,然后松懈下来并确信中国远远落后而认为什么都不需要做。相信我,我和各地的美国人交流过。他们需要的就是放松然后啥也不做。不会有斯普特尼克时刻了(斯普特尼克时刻:苏联发射了人类第一颗卫星,美国大受刺激,并开始太空竞赛),因为美国人会对那个视频兴奋不已然后变得松懈。

Vladislaw Ostpol
3 days ago edited
which Americans? I am an American and my wingles are not starting to tingle.
Actually since this happened you are the only person I have seen comment on it..
are you sure your wingles are not tingling?

哪个美国人这样?我是美国人我并没嗨起来,实际上自这件事发生以来你是我见过的唯一这么说的人。你确定嗨了的不是你吗?

CaseKL 3 days ago
Transparency?
Ask Boeing first

透明度?问问波音先(正文中认为嫦娥项目没有及时公布所有计划)

Richard Malcolm CaseKL
3 days ago
I suppose I can understand a corporation being opaque on news that might not be entirely happy for its shareholders. It is more disappointing that NASA is not saying more than it is.
That said, however, official Starliner coverage, inadequate as it is, is still miles beyond what CNSA has been giving the world on Chang'e 6. Which is disappointing, because it really is an amazing achievement that they can be rightly proud of.

我想我可以理解一家公司可能对其股东隐瞒让他们不那么满意的消息。更令人失望的是NASA没有透露更多信息。
话虽如此,尽管官方对星际客机的报道不充分,但仍然远超出了中国航天局在嫦娥六号上对外提供的信息。这令人失望,因为这确实是一项令人惊叹的成就,他们有理由为此感到自豪

Manthinks CaseKL
3 days ago
Boeing PR is total disaster given with all the US gov support and well-wishes by many.. Fact is failure to deliver the promises, it becomes not uncommon the narrative to be less "transparent"....
The misleading claim by NASA of a "successful" Moon landing by Intuitive Machine is a classic case...
[lix to Space News]

波音公关完全是灾难级的,在拥有美国政府全力的支持和很多人的祝福后。事实是没能兑现他们的承诺,不那么“透明”的叙述也不罕见…美国宇航局误导性的声明直觉机器”成功”登月是一个典型案例

Manthinks
3 days ago
China aims to send a pair of astronauts to the lunar surface before 2030.
...and yet Andrew accuses the Chinese for "not openly published timings of mission events in advance...". Since when non-participants of Chines space programs are entitled to more privileged information given the background of geopolitical tension ?

“中国的目标是在 2030 年之前将两名宇航品送上月球。”
作者指责中国"没有提前公布任务的时间安排"。从什么时候起中国航天计划的局外人在地缘关系紧张的背景下反倒有获得更多信息的特权了?

What qan do
4 days ago
Whenever you have an article about what "likely" happened, then there's not much there worth reading.

每当你发的文章是关于“可能”发生什么时,就感觉不值得读的了。

Richard Malcolm What qan do
4 days ago
There's only so much you can do when CNSA declines to offer minimum transparency about its missions on a timely basis, alas.

当中国航天局拒绝及时提供其任务的最低透明度时,你能做的也只有这么多了,唉。

What qan do Richard Malcolm
4 days ago
Then report it when you know it. To quote Gene Kranz, let's not make things worse by guessing.

那就在你都了解后报道吧。引用吉恩·克兰兹的话,别用瞎猜让事情变得更糟。

Richard Malcolm What qan do
3 days ago
Well, you can't win with this crowd. SN gets beat up in these same comboxes for giving insufficient or untimely reportage to Chinese space achievements. Now you're beating Andrew up because he reports it, in a timely way, but is forced to say, accurately, that much of the information remains unconfirmed by using qualifiers such as "likely."
Hey, I'm happy and congratulatory to CNSA. And hey, they are under no legal obligation to report anything they're doing. But it's still disappointing that they are so opaque about missions like these.

行吧,被你们打败了。在同样的评论区因太空新闻对中国太空成就的报道不足或不及时而被批评。现在你又批评安德鲁,就因为他要及时报道,但为了准确地报道未确认部分的信息而使用了“可能”等限定词。
嘿,我为中国航天局的成就表示高兴和祝贺。虽然他们没有法律义务报告他们所做的任何事。但他们对这样的任务如此不透明还是让人失望

原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


DP Huntsman What qan do
3 days ago
They are not ‘guessing’; they reported what independent sources they are getting their data from.
Dave Huntsman

他们不是在“猜测”,他们报道了他们从独立来源获取的信息。

Scott Reynolds
a day ago
Maybe NASA should ask the Chinese for help getting back to the moon and landing upright?

也许NASA应该请中国帮忙重回月球并平稳登陆?

Vladislaw
3 days ago
I found an article
China begins returning world's 1st samples from moon's far side
Space
07:54, 04-Jun-2024
CGTN , upxed 19:46, 04-Jun-2024

我找到了一篇文章
中国开始运回世界上首批来自月球远端的样本
“CGTN的新闻”

原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


Vladislaw
6 days ago edited
OFF TOPIC:
tough times for China.. huge rare earth discovery in the U.S.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/m...
So much for the Chinese monopoly.

题外话:中国的艰难时刻,在美国发现了巨大的稀土矿,中国的垄断就到这了

Ostpol Vladislaw
3 days ago
Why are you so happily posting this unrelated news in the comment section about Chang'e-6? Creating an industrial level mining operation to extract those materials will take decades, if they get the funding, pass the regulation and find the workers.

为什么你这么兴奋地在嫦娥六号的评论区发布这些无关的新闻?建立一个采炼矿的工业体系得要几十年时间,如果他们能获得资金,通过了法规并能找到工人的话。

David Ostpol
3 days ago
Says the queen of off topic crap filled posts!!!

全是题外的废话

Vladislaw David
3 days ago
why did you up vote him then?

那你为什么点赞?
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


David Vladislaw
2 days ago
I was temporarily insane and hit the wrong thumb.

我一时不清醒,点错了。

Vladislaw Ostpol
3 days ago
oh give me a break ..

偶,别逗了

Vladislaw Ostpol
3 days ago
because it ends China's monopoly ..

因为它结束了中国的垄断(回复问他为什么这么兴奋)

Vladislaw Ostpol
3 days ago
Sorry capitalism and capital markets don't wait for decades when it comes to low hanging fruit. And that is what this find is .. and you would know that by simply reading the article.

遗憾的是,资本主义和资本市场在果实唾手可得时不会等你几十年。这就是我发现的事,你只要读读这篇文章就知道了。

"Military Could Invest In Mining Critical Minerals In Wyoming
The U.S. military has a huge interest in rare earth materials, something Wyoming has an abundance of. For instance, the U.S. Air Force’s F-35 stealth fighter takes 850 pounds of rare earths to build.
The Pentagon brass is interested in investing in a few critical minerals mining projects, particularly rare earth opportunities that have emerged in Wyoming.
For sure, there’s a laundry list to pick from.

“军方可能会投资怀俄明州的关键采矿项目”
美国军方对稀土材料有着巨大的兴趣,而怀俄明州有丰富的这种材料。
举个栗子,美国空军的F-35需要850磅稀土来制造。
五角大楼的高层有兴趣投资一些关键采矿项目,特别是有怀俄明州发现稀土的这个机会。肯定行,从名单里挑一个就好

Since 2023, the Defense Production Act (DPA) has awarded $267.9 million to 10 companies to advance critical minerals projects, like rare earths, that could help with large energy storage batteries and specialty metals.

自2023 年以来, “国防生产法案”已向 10家公司拨款 2.679 亿美元,以推进稀土等关键矿产项目,这些项目可能有助于大型储能电池和特种金属的开发。

None of the 10 companies are Wyoming-centric, but the military is looking to invest in rare earths mining projects, something that Wyoming has.
The rare earth minerals bonanza is the result of consumers starved for magnet metals integral to the green transition to electric vehicles, wind turbines, consumer goods, robots and military drones, missiles and chips needed for sophisticated computing power.

这10家公司都不是以怀俄明州为中心的,但军方正在寻求投资稀土采矿的项目,而怀俄明州有
稀土矿产的丰富是消费者迫切需要磁性金属的结果,这些金属是转型到电动车、风力发电机、消费品、机器人和军用无人机、导弹和先进芯片的可持续发展所必须的

The military has a huge interest in rare earths.
For instance, the U.S. Air Force’s F-35 stealth fighter takes 850 pounds of rare earths to build, while the average electric vehicle (EV) takes about 1 kilogram of rare earth minerals, or 6,000 metric tons to produce 6 million EVs.
[lix to Cowboy State Daily]

军方对稀土巨有兴趣。
例如,美国空军的F-35需要850磅稀土来制造,而平均每辆电动汽车需要大约1千克稀土矿物,或者说6000吨的稀土可以生产600万辆电动汽车。

Scott Reynolds Vladislaw
a day ago
Isn't the EPA going to have to do a multi-year study on how mining will impact the environment? Then you have to get the permits, set up an infrastructure, build a town for the miners, hire the miners, pay off the unxs, then start work....I'm thinking 10 years before any production, at a minimum.

难道环保署就不需要研究个几年来了解采矿对环境的影响吗?然后还需要取得许可证,建基础设施,建一个矿工镇,雇用矿工,支付工会费用,然后开始工作……我认为至少需要10年才能投产。

Vladislaw Scott Reynolds
19 hours ago
When the DOD and National Security are added to the equation it changes from a purely commercial operation.

当国防部和 “国家安全”被加进来时,它就不再是纯粹的商业运作了

很赞 20
收藏