美国海军迫切希望缩小与中国的差距。日本或韩国能拯救美国造船厂吗？
正文翻译
US shipbuilders are non-competitive against dual-purpose shipbuilders from China, Japan, and Korea, who have multiple revenue streams that can finance new investment and best practices. For military ships, Denmark provides a recent case study of developing a best-in-class missile frigate at about a fourth the cost of the US Navy's latest-generation frigate.
US Navy officials are racing to close the gap with China, the world's number largest shipbuilder and now the largest navy, and hope Japan and Korea are willing to invest in and upgrade abandoned US facilities.
美国造船商与中国、日本和韩国的军民两用造船商相比没有竞争力，因为这些公司拥有多种收入来源，可以为新投资和最佳实践提供资金。对于军舰，丹麦提供了一个最近的案例研究，该国开发了一艘同类最佳的导弹护卫舰，其成本约为美国海军最新一代护卫舰的四分之一。
美国海军官员正在竞相缩小与中国——世界上最大的造船国和现在最大的海军——的差距，并希望日本和韩国愿意投资和升级废弃的美国设施。
US shipbuilders are non-competitive against dual-purpose shipbuilders from China, Japan, and Korea, who have multiple revenue streams that can finance new investment and best practices. For military ships, Denmark provides a recent case study of developing a best-in-class missile frigate at about a fourth the cost of the US Navy's latest-generation frigate.
US Navy officials are racing to close the gap with China, the world's number largest shipbuilder and now the largest navy, and hope Japan and Korea are willing to invest in and upgrade abandoned US facilities.
美国造船商与中国、日本和韩国的军民两用造船商相比没有竞争力，因为这些公司拥有多种收入来源，可以为新投资和最佳实践提供资金。对于军舰，丹麦提供了一个最近的案例研究，该国开发了一艘同类最佳的导弹护卫舰，其成本约为美国海军最新一代护卫舰的四分之一。
美国海军官员正在竞相缩小与中国——世界上最大的造船国和现在最大的海军——的差距，并希望日本和韩国愿意投资和升级废弃的美国设施。
评论翻译
@klaasvakie
The USA's desperation is becoming embarrassing!
美国的绝望已经令人尴尬了！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The USA's desperation is becoming embarrassing!
美国的绝望已经令人尴尬了！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@hungo7720
China's robust shipbuilding industry is dominating and outpacing the rest of the world. On the other hand, the US manufacturing capability is capped and crippled by its staggering costs.
中国强劲的造船业在全球占据主导地位，并远远超过其他地区。另一方面，美国制造能力却因成本过高而受到限制和削弱。
China's robust shipbuilding industry is dominating and outpacing the rest of the world. On the other hand, the US manufacturing capability is capped and crippled by its staggering costs.
中国强劲的造船业在全球占据主导地位，并远远超过其他地区。另一方面，美国制造能力却因成本过高而受到限制和削弱。
@johnsmith1953x
America is freakin' going broke and we want to make shipyards?!?
America has lost its freakin mind.
美国快破产了，我们还要建造船厂？！？美国已经失去理智了。
America is freakin' going broke and we want to make shipyards?!?
America has lost its freakin mind.
美国快破产了，我们还要建造船厂？！？美国已经失去理智了。
@user-ne6xw1sv4u
The master orders his two Asian lackeys to "share" their skills and technology, having them built his naval fleets and saved the U.S. shipyards. Later, he'll sanction South-Korean and Japanese shipyards for unfair competition.
主人命令他的两个亚洲走狗“分享”他们的技能和技术，让他们建造他的海军舰队并拯救美国造船厂。随后，他会因不公平竞争而制裁韩国和日本的造船厂。
The master orders his two Asian lackeys to "share" their skills and technology, having them built his naval fleets and saved the U.S. shipyards. Later, he'll sanction South-Korean and Japanese shipyards for unfair competition.
主人命令他的两个亚洲走狗“分享”他们的技能和技术，让他们建造他的海军舰队并拯救美国造船厂。随后，他会因不公平竞争而制裁韩国和日本的造船厂。
@coreytrevor1311
Without the military industrial complex, America goes the way of Great Britain.
没有军事工业综合体，美国就会走上英国的老路。
Without the military industrial complex, America goes the way of Great Britain.
没有军事工业综合体，美国就会走上英国的老路。
@namelesswarrior4760
The problem with the US government, military & elites are not being genuine with anything that they are dealing with atm. Including the "Allies". Everyone is getting sick of the US' bullying
美国政府、军队和精英们的问题在于，他们目前所面对的一切都不够真诚。包括“盟友”。每个人都厌倦了美国的欺凌
The problem with the US government, military & elites are not being genuine with anything that they are dealing with atm. Including the "Allies". Everyone is getting sick of the US' bullying
美国政府、军队和精英们的问题在于，他们目前所面对的一切都不够真诚。包括“盟友”。每个人都厌倦了美国的欺凌
@Hystericall
35 Trillion dollars... I remember when the debt was less than 1T before Regan, and everyone thought that was big and not sustainable....we are bankrupt country with a big mouth and high opinion of ourselves. Very dangerous.
35 万亿美元……我记得在里根执政之前，债务不到 1 万亿美元，每个人都认为这太大了，不可持续……我们是一个破产的国家，嘴巴很大，自视甚高。非常危险。
35 Trillion dollars... I remember when the debt was less than 1T before Regan, and everyone thought that was big and not sustainable....we are bankrupt country with a big mouth and high opinion of ourselves. Very dangerous.
35 万亿美元……我记得在里根执政之前，债务不到 1 万亿美元，每个人都认为这太大了，不可持续……我们是一个破产的国家，嘴巴很大，自视甚高。非常危险。
@guens01
Let that sink in. The country with the biggest military budget in the world cannot build ships. Lol . The joke of the century.
让我们深思一下。世界上军事预算最多的国家却无法建造军舰。哈哈。本世纪的笑话。
Let that sink in. The country with the biggest military budget in the world cannot build ships. Lol . The joke of the century.
让我们深思一下。世界上军事预算最多的国家却无法建造军舰。哈哈。本世纪的笑话。
@seymorefact4333
️️USA, s Korea, Japan has aging population since 1990s! Who's going to build those ships! They can always contract Chinese COSCO!
美国、韩国、日本自 1990 年代以来人口老龄化！谁来建造这些船！他们可以一直与中国远洋集团签约。
️️USA, s Korea, Japan has aging population since 1990s! Who's going to build those ships! They can always contract Chinese COSCO!
美国、韩国、日本自 1990 年代以来人口老龄化！谁来建造这些船！他们可以一直与中国远洋集团签约。
@j.c.4192
"Making South Korea and Japan to open up subsidiaries in the US and transfer the technology..."
What sort of deal is it now? Higher cost to build, longer supply chain, and forced technology transfer to the US?
That's stupid deal for South Korea and Japan if you ask me.
“让韩国、日本在美国开设子公司，转让技术……”
现在这是什么交易？建造成本更高、供应链更长、强制技术转让给美国？
如果你问我，这对韩国和日本来说是愚蠢的交易。
"Making South Korea and Japan to open up subsidiaries in the US and transfer the technology..."
What sort of deal is it now? Higher cost to build, longer supply chain, and forced technology transfer to the US?
That's stupid deal for South Korea and Japan if you ask me.
“让韩国、日本在美国开设子公司，转让技术……”
现在这是什么交易？建造成本更高、供应链更长、强制技术转让给美国？
如果你问我，这对韩国和日本来说是愚蠢的交易。
@user-rl5wm1cm1k
A report from the U.S.A. : I was recently employed by a state agency in a maintenance & repair facility. 8 managers + 11 maintenance technicians. All of the managers made well over $100,000 per year with benefits. The eight managers together did on a good day one hour of work. All of the managers were drug addicts. The maintenance technicians did on average 2 hours per day of work max. The repair quality was horrible. 2/3 of the maintenance technicians were on drugs. Trust me, nothing in the U.S.A. can be fixed by the government. State of Arkansas.
来自美国的一份报告：我最近受雇于一家政府机构的维护和维修设施。有 8 名经理 + 11 名维护技术人员。所有经理的年薪都超过 10 万美元，还有福利。八名经理一天的工作量最多为 1 小时。
所有经理都是瘾君子。维修技术人员平均每天最多工作 2 小时。维修质量很差。2/3 的维修技术人员吸毒。相信我，美国没有任何东西是政府可以解决的。阿肯色州。
A report from the U.S.A. : I was recently employed by a state agency in a maintenance & repair facility. 8 managers + 11 maintenance technicians. All of the managers made well over $100,000 per year with benefits. The eight managers together did on a good day one hour of work. All of the managers were drug addicts. The maintenance technicians did on average 2 hours per day of work max. The repair quality was horrible. 2/3 of the maintenance technicians were on drugs. Trust me, nothing in the U.S.A. can be fixed by the government. State of Arkansas.
来自美国的一份报告：我最近受雇于一家政府机构的维护和维修设施。有 8 名经理 + 11 名维护技术人员。所有经理的年薪都超过 10 万美元，还有福利。八名经理一天的工作量最多为 1 小时。
所有经理都是瘾君子。维修技术人员平均每天最多工作 2 小时。维修质量很差。2/3 的维修技术人员吸毒。相信我，美国没有任何东西是政府可以解决的。阿肯色州。
@j.a.p.818
This video is shadow banned on Facebook, by Facebook. IDK why.
该视频被 Facebook 暗中禁止。我不知道为什么。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
This video is shadow banned on Facebook, by Facebook. IDK why.
该视频被 Facebook 暗中禁止。我不知道为什么。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@douginorlando6260
The problem is not finding skilled labor. The problem is willing to pay skilled labor what they are worth. In the US, Wall Street driven business decisions focus on maximizing profits to the extent they are no longer sharing the wealth with the laborers; instead they use the money that would improve the company to do stock buybacks and pay themselves 300 times more than anyone else. Compare this to China where the workers are improving their standard of living instead of going backwards.
问题不在于找到熟练劳动力，而在于是否愿意向熟练劳动力支付与其价值相符的报酬。在美国，华尔街的商业决策注重利润最大化，以至于他们不再与劳动者分享财富；相反，他们用本来可以改善公司的钱来回购股票，给自己的报酬是其他人的 300 倍。相比之下，中国工人的生活水平正在提高，而不是倒退。
The problem is not finding skilled labor. The problem is willing to pay skilled labor what they are worth. In the US, Wall Street driven business decisions focus on maximizing profits to the extent they are no longer sharing the wealth with the laborers; instead they use the money that would improve the company to do stock buybacks and pay themselves 300 times more than anyone else. Compare this to China where the workers are improving their standard of living instead of going backwards.
问题不在于找到熟练劳动力，而在于是否愿意向熟练劳动力支付与其价值相符的报酬。在美国，华尔街的商业决策注重利润最大化，以至于他们不再与劳动者分享财富；相反，他们用本来可以改善公司的钱来回购股票，给自己的报酬是其他人的 300 倍。相比之下，中国工人的生活水平正在提高，而不是倒退。
@jonathanfriedlander8563
CHINA IS NOT THE PROBLEM CHILD !
中国不是问题儿童！
CHINA IS NOT THE PROBLEM CHILD !
中国不是问题儿童！
@JR-zm7ju
USA is so weird they can print money for ukraine, but they cant print money for their own shipyard
美国太奇怪了，他们可以为乌克兰印钞，却不能为自己的造船厂印钞
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
USA is so weird they can print money for ukraine, but they cant print money for their own shipyard
美国太奇怪了，他们可以为乌克兰印钞，却不能为自己的造船厂印钞
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@glass8289
There is an easy solution for this. Print more Ships, like printing more US dollars.
有一个简单的解决办法。印制更多的船只，就像印制更多的美元一样。
There is an easy solution for this. Print more Ships, like printing more US dollars.
有一个简单的解决办法。印制更多的船只，就像印制更多的美元一样。
@eymaslacker
What is Japan and S. Korea getting from building shipyards, training people, building supply chains, etc?
I only see contributions by Japan and S. Korea, nothing from the USA. Is this supposed to be a thuggish demand or a charity case?
日本和韩国从建造造船厂、培训人员、建立供应链等方面得到了什么？
我只看到日本和韩国的贡献，没有美国的贡献。这应该是暴徒的要求还是慈善案件？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
What is Japan and S. Korea getting from building shipyards, training people, building supply chains, etc?
I only see contributions by Japan and S. Korea, nothing from the USA. Is this supposed to be a thuggish demand or a charity case?
日本和韩国从建造造船厂、培训人员、建立供应链等方面得到了什么？
我只看到日本和韩国的贡献，没有美国的贡献。这应该是暴徒的要求还是慈善案件？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@louischau7982
China is making ships like they are making dumplings . Ain’t no way they can catch up even with the help from them
中国造船就像下饺子一样，就算有韩日的帮助，他们也赶不上
China is making ships like they are making dumplings . Ain’t no way they can catch up even with the help from them
中国造船就像下饺子一样，就算有韩日的帮助，他们也赶不上
@Larkinchance
Casting your mind back a few years, the US navy was taking bids on modernizing military port at Sevastopol and today, we see how that went. This also explains NATO's preoccupation with Crimea..
In a country that seems to lagging in so many crucial areas requiring engineering, you would think that education would be #1 priority. However the US has protected high tuitions and loan traps at a time when we need millions more highly educated people. An individual should be able to go as far as their grades can carry them. I'm wasting my breath....
回想几年前，美国海军正在竞标塞瓦斯托波尔(位于克里米亚)的现代化军港，今天，我们来看看进展如何。这也解释了北约对克里米亚的关注。
在一个似乎在许多需要工程技术的关键领域落后的国家，你可能会认为教育应该是头等大事。然而，在我们需要数百万受过高等教育的人的时候，美国却保护了高昂的学费和贷款陷阱。一个人应该是能够达到他们成绩所能达到的高度。我真是白费口舌……
Casting your mind back a few years, the US navy was taking bids on modernizing military port at Sevastopol and today, we see how that went. This also explains NATO's preoccupation with Crimea..
In a country that seems to lagging in so many crucial areas requiring engineering, you would think that education would be #1 priority. However the US has protected high tuitions and loan traps at a time when we need millions more highly educated people. An individual should be able to go as far as their grades can carry them. I'm wasting my breath....
回想几年前，美国海军正在竞标塞瓦斯托波尔(位于克里米亚)的现代化军港，今天，我们来看看进展如何。这也解释了北约对克里米亚的关注。
在一个似乎在许多需要工程技术的关键领域落后的国家，你可能会认为教育应该是头等大事。然而，在我们需要数百万受过高等教育的人的时候，美国却保护了高昂的学费和贷款陷阱。一个人应该是能够达到他们成绩所能达到的高度。我真是白费口舌……
@barrywong4327
Kevin, you’re brutally honest about the lunacies of the US government, not just about the shipping building industry but on every topic you cover on this channel.
The sad truth is that assessments like yours and from others with similar perspective will never get heard in the halls of Washington. You’ll be lucky if you don’t get accused of being a China stooge.
Having said that truth seekers like myself appreciate your tireless effort of telling it like it is.
Thank you and keep up the good work!
凯文，你对美国政府的疯狂行为直言不讳，不仅仅是关于航运建造业，而且关于你在这个频道上报道的每一个话题。
可悲的事实是，像你这样的评估，以及其他持有类似观点的人的评估，永远不会在华盛顿的大厅里被听到。如果你没有被指控为中国走狗，那你就很幸运了。
话虽如此，像我这样的追求真相的人感谢您不懈地努力说出真相。
谢谢您，继续努力！
Kevin, you’re brutally honest about the lunacies of the US government, not just about the shipping building industry but on every topic you cover on this channel.
The sad truth is that assessments like yours and from others with similar perspective will never get heard in the halls of Washington. You’ll be lucky if you don’t get accused of being a China stooge.
Having said that truth seekers like myself appreciate your tireless effort of telling it like it is.
Thank you and keep up the good work!
凯文，你对美国政府的疯狂行为直言不讳，不仅仅是关于航运建造业，而且关于你在这个频道上报道的每一个话题。
可悲的事实是，像你这样的评估，以及其他持有类似观点的人的评估，永远不会在华盛顿的大厅里被听到。如果你没有被指控为中国走狗，那你就很幸运了。
话虽如此，像我这样的追求真相的人感谢您不懈地努力说出真相。
谢谢您，继续努力！
@hpw-ws6bj
India can help. Need anything demolished?
印度可以帮忙。需要拆除什么吗？
India can help. Need anything demolished?
印度可以帮忙。需要拆除什么吗？
@teac117
I think it's slightly sad when your only "Allies" are those that you've sat army bases on their territory because of a war fought 70+ years ago.
我认为，当你唯一的“盟友”是那些因为 70 多年前的战争而在其领土上设立军事基地的人时，这有点令人悲哀。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I think it's slightly sad when your only "Allies" are those that you've sat army bases on their territory because of a war fought 70+ years ago.
我认为，当你唯一的“盟友”是那些因为 70 多年前的战争而在其领土上设立军事基地的人时，这有点令人悲哀。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@stevenliew2507
Why would both S.Korea and Japan build up US Shipping Building..... for what?
Charity??
Dream on.
Better ask the Philippines to help to to rebuild the US Shipping Building Industry or perhaps even better, India.
为什么韩国和日本都要建设美国航运业.....为了什么？
慈善？？
做梦吧。
最好要求菲律宾帮助重建美国航运业，或者更好的是，要求印度帮助重建。
Why would both S.Korea and Japan build up US Shipping Building..... for what?
Charity??
Dream on.
Better ask the Philippines to help to to rebuild the US Shipping Building Industry or perhaps even better, India.
为什么韩国和日本都要建设美国航运业.....为了什么？
慈善？？
做梦吧。
最好要求菲律宾帮助重建美国航运业，或者更好的是，要求印度帮助重建。
@jjsmith4829
wierd how japan and s korea and china dont try harder to get along after all they are geo neighbours; asking japan and s korea to open shipbuilding facilities in the usa to help them out is the height of arrogance; the usa knows it is in trouble and whats weird is they cannot figure out how to fix themselves
奇怪的是，日本、韩国和中国毕竟是地缘邻居，却没有努力和睦相处；要求日本和韩国在美国开设造船厂来帮助他们，这是傲慢的极致；美国知道自己有麻烦了，奇怪的是他们不知道如何自救
wierd how japan and s korea and china dont try harder to get along after all they are geo neighbours; asking japan and s korea to open shipbuilding facilities in the usa to help them out is the height of arrogance; the usa knows it is in trouble and whats weird is they cannot figure out how to fix themselves
奇怪的是，日本、韩国和中国毕竟是地缘邻居，却没有努力和睦相处；要求日本和韩国在美国开设造船厂来帮助他们，这是傲慢的极致；美国知道自己有麻烦了，奇怪的是他们不知道如何自救
@alrent2992
Keep pace? The u.s. will never catch up! It's way behind. China has the majority of ship building facilities in the world.
跟上？美国永远追不上！它落后太多了。中国拥有世界上大多数的造船设施。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Keep pace? The u.s. will never catch up! It's way behind. China has the majority of ship building facilities in the world.
跟上？美国永远追不上！它落后太多了。中国拥有世界上大多数的造船设施。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Dawson2011H
Sounds like a grim situation with no clear solution in sight
听起来情况很严峻，而且看不到明确的解决方案
Sounds like a grim situation with no clear solution in sight
听起来情况很严峻，而且看不到明确的解决方案
@gregarnot5066
Remember the $7500 coffee maker?
The Air Force chose not to use commercial coffee makers like those used on 747’s. Instead they wanted a coffee maker which would not spill coffee if the plane was upside down
Critical question, will the USAF repair the coffee maker of throw it away? They chose to repair. That meant Lockheed had to design and build repair equipment?
Even more expensive, the decision to repair the coffee makers, meant a repair manual had to be written and published
The $7500 coffee maker a very expensive repair manual
还记得那台价值 7500 美元的咖啡机吗？
空军选择不使用 747 上使用的商用咖啡机。相反，他们想要一台即使飞机倒置也不会洒出咖啡的咖啡机。
关键问题是，美国空军会修理咖啡机还是将其扔掉？他们选择修理。这意味着洛克希德必须设计和制造修理设备？
更昂贵的是，决定修理咖啡机意味着必须编写和发布修理手册，价值 7500 美元的咖啡机的修理手册非常昂贵
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Remember the $7500 coffee maker?
The Air Force chose not to use commercial coffee makers like those used on 747’s. Instead they wanted a coffee maker which would not spill coffee if the plane was upside down
Critical question, will the USAF repair the coffee maker of throw it away? They chose to repair. That meant Lockheed had to design and build repair equipment?
Even more expensive, the decision to repair the coffee makers, meant a repair manual had to be written and published
The $7500 coffee maker a very expensive repair manual
还记得那台价值 7500 美元的咖啡机吗？
空军选择不使用 747 上使用的商用咖啡机。相反，他们想要一台即使飞机倒置也不会洒出咖啡的咖啡机。
关键问题是，美国空军会修理咖啡机还是将其扔掉？他们选择修理。这意味着洛克希德必须设计和制造修理设备？
更昂贵的是，决定修理咖啡机意味着必须编写和发布修理手册，价值 7500 美元的咖啡机的修理手册非常昂贵
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Quagma-b2i
I really wonder what our economy is based on. The list of things the US used to produce but no longer does is longer than my arm. 350 million people here, what are we actually doing?
我真的很想知道我们的经济是靠什么支撑的。美国过去生产但现在不再生产的东西的清单，比我的手臂还长。这里有 3.5 亿人，我们到底在做什么？
I really wonder what our economy is based on. The list of things the US used to produce but no longer does is longer than my arm. 350 million people here, what are we actually doing?
我真的很想知道我们的经济是靠什么支撑的。美国过去生产但现在不再生产的东西的清单，比我的手臂还长。这里有 3.5 亿人，我们到底在做什么？
@pernilsson9749
Thank you, ones again, for your clear and insightful programs.
Not only knowledge.
Not only intressting topics.
Not only a view of a "world" that obviously contain so much and so many.
But also your respectful aprouch to both the peoples, the country and theire role in our worlds economy, as in all our lifes.
A sincere thank you from Europe, Sweden, Kiruna, and from me.
再次感谢你们清晰而富有洞察力的节目。
不仅仅是知识。
不仅仅是有趣的话题。
不仅仅是对显然包含如此多内容的“世界”的看法。
而且你们也尊重人民、国家以及他们在世界经济和我们所有人生活中所扮演的角色。
我代表欧洲、瑞典、基律纳（瑞典北部城市）和我向你表示诚挚的感谢。
Thank you, ones again, for your clear and insightful programs.
Not only knowledge.
Not only intressting topics.
Not only a view of a "world" that obviously contain so much and so many.
But also your respectful aprouch to both the peoples, the country and theire role in our worlds economy, as in all our lifes.
A sincere thank you from Europe, Sweden, Kiruna, and from me.
再次感谢你们清晰而富有洞察力的节目。
不仅仅是知识。
不仅仅是有趣的话题。
不仅仅是对显然包含如此多内容的“世界”的看法。
而且你们也尊重人民、国家以及他们在世界经济和我们所有人生活中所扮演的角色。
我代表欧洲、瑞典、基律纳（瑞典北部城市）和我向你表示诚挚的感谢。
@yingxu7908
Again to see you Kevin the great。You absolutely right and thank you
再次见到你，凯文，你太棒了。你完全正确，谢谢你
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Again to see you Kevin the great。You absolutely right and thank you
再次见到你，凯文，你太棒了。你完全正确，谢谢你
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@MicheleLLOYD-bk2mt
just bloody great mate. so much appreciatee
真是太棒了，非常感谢
just bloody great mate. so much appreciatee
真是太棒了，非常感谢
@johnyossarian9059
"Making South Korea and Japan to open up subsidiaries in the US and transfer the technology..."
That's stealing IP and jobs from the Koreans and Japanese!
“让韩国和日本在美国开设子公司并转让技术……”
这是在窃取韩国和日本的知识产权和工作机会！
"Making South Korea and Japan to open up subsidiaries in the US and transfer the technology..."
That's stealing IP and jobs from the Koreans and Japanese!
“让韩国和日本在美国开设子公司并转让技术……”
这是在窃取韩国和日本的知识产权和工作机会！
@pfcwells522
Why are we like this, smh.
我们为什么会这样
Why are we like this, smh.
我们为什么会这样
@melleblanc971
US no longer has a shipbuilding industry, and a very limited steel industry to supply it. Much of the US navy and support craft is very old (ancient).
美国不再拥有造船业，钢铁业也非常有限。美国海军和支援舰艇大多非常老旧。
US no longer has a shipbuilding industry, and a very limited steel industry to supply it. Much of the US navy and support craft is very old (ancient).
美国不再拥有造船业，钢铁业也非常有限。美国海军和支援舰艇大多非常老旧。
@JackMorningstar-nm8gc
So what does endless war do for a country, its people, limited resources and future opportunities?
那么无休止的战争会给一个国家、它的人民、有限的资源和未来的机会带来什么影响呢？
So what does endless war do for a country, its people, limited resources and future opportunities?
那么无休止的战争会给一个国家、它的人民、有限的资源和未来的机会带来什么影响呢？
@jimmymichaud2129
Electric Boat in CT would go to technical high schools and recruit workers and then pay to train, 18 yr olds with good paying jobs, but that was before the craziness set in.
康涅狄格州的 电动船舶公司会去技术高中招募工人，然后出资培训，为 18 岁的年轻人提供高薪工作，但那是在疯狂开始之前。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Electric Boat in CT would go to technical high schools and recruit workers and then pay to train, 18 yr olds with good paying jobs, but that was before the craziness set in.
康涅狄格州的 电动船舶公司会去技术高中招募工人，然后出资培训，为 18 岁的年轻人提供高薪工作，但那是在疯狂开始之前。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@user-rl5wm1cm1k
I'm a 64 year old U.S. citizen. In mother's family their was 12 children. Eleven of them were government employees. The longer the siblings "Served Society" the higher the debt, inflation, crime and corruption would become. Government=debt, corruption, crime & decay. Yup, it's democracy.
我是一名 64 岁的美国公民。我母亲家里有 12 个孩子。其中 11 个是政府雇员。兄弟姐妹“服务社会”的时间越长，债务、通货膨胀、犯罪和腐败就会越多。政府=债务、腐败、犯罪和衰败。是的，这就是民主。
I'm a 64 year old U.S. citizen. In mother's family their was 12 children. Eleven of them were government employees. The longer the siblings "Served Society" the higher the debt, inflation, crime and corruption would become. Government=debt, corruption, crime & decay. Yup, it's democracy.
我是一名 64 岁的美国公民。我母亲家里有 12 个孩子。其中 11 个是政府雇员。兄弟姐妹“服务社会”的时间越长，债务、通货膨胀、犯罪和腐败就会越多。政府=债务、腐败、犯罪和衰败。是的，这就是民主。
@emilyblade9676
What does Japan and Korea get out of it though? Shipyards will be in the US, US jobs, US owned ship yards, technology transfer to US, seems like everything is for the US to gain?
但日本和韩国从中得到了什么呢？造船厂将设在美国，美国有工作，美国拥有造船厂，技术转让给美国，似乎一切都是为了美国？
What does Japan and Korea get out of it though? Shipyards will be in the US, US jobs, US owned ship yards, technology transfer to US, seems like everything is for the US to gain?
但日本和韩国从中得到了什么呢？造船厂将设在美国，美国有工作，美国拥有造船厂，技术转让给美国，似乎一切都是为了美国？
@lui9137
Absolutely love your content. Could you record sometimes showing in the background some of the amazing projects China has like a high speed train? It would be great to see more.
非常喜欢您的内容。您能否录制一些视频，在背景中展示一些中国令人惊叹的项目，比如高铁？如果能看到更多就更好了。
Absolutely love your content. Could you record sometimes showing in the background some of the amazing projects China has like a high speed train? It would be great to see more.
非常喜欢您的内容。您能否录制一些视频，在背景中展示一些中国令人惊叹的项目，比如高铁？如果能看到更多就更好了。
@Ace1000ks19751982
The US doesn't have much of a shipbuilding industry, so investing more money in a sector that where the production capacity doesn't exist is meaningless.
They don't need other countries to invest money in building up US industries, they can create money out of thin air and put it in there.
The US forgets that having the world reserve currency does have its limitations, you cannot create unlimited money out of thin air and build real industries overnight.
美国造船业并不发达，因此在没有生产能力的行业投入更多资金是没有意义的。
他们不需要其他国家投资来建设美国工业，他们可以凭空创造钱并将其投入其中。
美国忘记了，拥有世界储备货币确实有其局限性，你不可能凭空创造出无限的货币并在一夜之间建立起真正的产业。
The US doesn't have much of a shipbuilding industry, so investing more money in a sector that where the production capacity doesn't exist is meaningless.
They don't need other countries to invest money in building up US industries, they can create money out of thin air and put it in there.
The US forgets that having the world reserve currency does have its limitations, you cannot create unlimited money out of thin air and build real industries overnight.
美国造船业并不发达，因此在没有生产能力的行业投入更多资金是没有意义的。
他们不需要其他国家投资来建设美国工业，他们可以凭空创造钱并将其投入其中。
美国忘记了，拥有世界储备货币确实有其局限性，你不可能凭空创造出无限的货币并在一夜之间建立起真正的产业。
@davidrichards1741
There are six cities in China whose greater area and total production exceeds all of Korea, a small country with no resources, very little land, and a similar population to canada albeit korea outperforms canada academically, and especially the US, an academically poor-performing country which is a fundamental cause of the rapid US decline.
中国有六个城市的面积和总产量超过了整个韩国，而韩国是一个没有资源、土地很少、人口与加拿大相似的小国，尽管韩国在学术上胜过加拿大，尤其是胜过美国，而美国是一个学术表现较差的国家，这是美国迅速衰落的根本原因。
There are six cities in China whose greater area and total production exceeds all of Korea, a small country with no resources, very little land, and a similar population to canada albeit korea outperforms canada academically, and especially the US, an academically poor-performing country which is a fundamental cause of the rapid US decline.
中国有六个城市的面积和总产量超过了整个韩国，而韩国是一个没有资源、土地很少、人口与加拿大相似的小国，尽管韩国在学术上胜过加拿大，尤其是胜过美国，而美国是一个学术表现较差的国家，这是美国迅速衰落的根本原因。
@willengel2458
Japan and South Korea have the know how and capability to build and maintain warships for its master. the question is would the empire trust its colonies with potential lost of military technology?
日本和韩国拥有为其主人建造和维护军舰的技术知识和能力。问题是，帝国会把军事技术的潜在损失托付给殖民地吗?
Japan and South Korea have the know how and capability to build and maintain warships for its master. the question is would the empire trust its colonies with potential lost of military technology?
日本和韩国拥有为其主人建造和维护军舰的技术知识和能力。问题是，帝国会把军事技术的潜在损失托付给殖民地吗?
@michaelbartlett6864
In the US, we don't have money for heath care, education, infrastructure or a host of other needs, but we can always print more money for deficit spending on an ever-increasing military budget - Until we can't!
With the national debt now souring over 35 Trillion Dollars and each individual citizen's part of that debt exceeding One Hundred Thousand Dollars for EACH man, woman and child in the country, it will never be paid down.
All the other countries in the world are realizing this reality and are rightfully moving away from the US Dollar as the world's reserve currency and moving away from the US Empire and hegemony to join BRICS for their own survival and there are more and more joining every day.
THIS IS HOW EMPIRES DIE!!
在美国，我们没有钱用于医疗保健、教育、基础设施或其他一系列需求，但我们总是可以印更多的钱来弥补不断增加的军事预算的赤字支出——直到我们不能这样做！
现在国家债务已超过 35 万亿美元，而每个公民所欠债务超过十万美元，无论男女老少，这些债务永远都无法偿还。
世界上所有其他国家都意识到了这一现实，并理所当然地放弃美元作为世界储备货币，脱离美帝国和霸权，加入金砖国家，以求生存，而且每天都有越来越多的国家加入。
这就是帝国灭亡的方式！！
In the US, we don't have money for heath care, education, infrastructure or a host of other needs, but we can always print more money for deficit spending on an ever-increasing military budget - Until we can't!
With the national debt now souring over 35 Trillion Dollars and each individual citizen's part of that debt exceeding One Hundred Thousand Dollars for EACH man, woman and child in the country, it will never be paid down.
All the other countries in the world are realizing this reality and are rightfully moving away from the US Dollar as the world's reserve currency and moving away from the US Empire and hegemony to join BRICS for their own survival and there are more and more joining every day.
THIS IS HOW EMPIRES DIE!!
在美国，我们没有钱用于医疗保健、教育、基础设施或其他一系列需求，但我们总是可以印更多的钱来弥补不断增加的军事预算的赤字支出——直到我们不能这样做！
现在国家债务已超过 35 万亿美元，而每个公民所欠债务超过十万美元，无论男女老少，这些债务永远都无法偿还。
世界上所有其他国家都意识到了这一现实，并理所当然地放弃美元作为世界储备货币，脱离美帝国和霸权，加入金砖国家，以求生存，而且每天都有越来越多的国家加入。
这就是帝国灭亡的方式！！
@rockychan4739
Getting South Korea and Japan to train American workers and then sanction both of them once they acquired the skills
让韩国和日本培训美国工人，然后在他们掌握技能后对两国进行制裁
Getting South Korea and Japan to train American workers and then sanction both of them once they acquired the skills
让韩国和日本培训美国工人，然后在他们掌握技能后对两国进行制裁
@seeker2118
Is economics a study of scarcity or is it a study of supply and demand. Scarcity is a matter of not being able to control supply and demand.
经济学是研究稀缺性的，还是研究供给和需求的。稀缺性是指无法控制供给和需求。
Is economics a study of scarcity or is it a study of supply and demand. Scarcity is a matter of not being able to control supply and demand.
经济学是研究稀缺性的，还是研究供给和需求的。稀缺性是指无法控制供给和需求。
@kimsejrskildnielsen6369
Once again fantastic research and dissemination, you and the team should have at least 1 million followers.. Many thanks from Denmark.
Ps - I can recommend the Franciscan Ricard Rohr, (ex The Divine Dance or The Universal Christ)
再次，出色的研究和播报，你和你的团队应该至少有 100 万粉丝。来自丹麦，非常感谢。
PS - 我可以推荐方济各会的里卡德罗尔，（前《神圣之舞》或《普世基督》）
Once again fantastic research and dissemination, you and the team should have at least 1 million followers.. Many thanks from Denmark.
Ps - I can recommend the Franciscan Ricard Rohr, (ex The Divine Dance or The Universal Christ)
再次，出色的研究和播报，你和你的团队应该至少有 100 万粉丝。来自丹麦，非常感谢。
PS - 我可以推荐方济各会的里卡德罗尔，（前《神圣之舞》或《普世基督》）
@gelinrefira
Actually economic is the study of the politics of allocating resources.
实际上经济学是研究资源配置的政治学。
Actually economic is the study of the politics of allocating resources.
实际上经济学是研究资源配置的政治学。
@jackjanpour8532
What is the role of government. That the difference between US and China.
政府的作用是什么？这就是美国和中国的区别。
What is the role of government. That the difference between US and China.
政府的作用是什么？这就是美国和中国的区别。
@Moon-Birdy
If ship building company was not profitable in the USA, could the Japanese or Korean company find their fortune in there ？
如果造船公司在美国不赚钱，那么日本、韩国的公司能在那里找到发财的机会吗？
If ship building company was not profitable in the USA, could the Japanese or Korean company find their fortune in there ？
如果造船公司在美国不赚钱，那么日本、韩国的公司能在那里找到发财的机会吗？
@dartbreaker
You have quickly become one of the best presenters on YouTube, and one reason for it is that, unlike 95% of video bloggers, you do not pad your videos with superfluous information. You cut to the chase. A typical video on YouTube takes up the topic in its title about 40% into the video. Again, you cut to the chase from the git-go. Keep it up.
您很快就成为 YouTube 上最出色的主持人之一，原因之一是，与 95% 的视频博主不同，您不会在视频中添加多余的信息。您直奔主题。YouTube 上的典型视频在标题中占据了约 40% 的话题。同样，您从一开始就切入正题。坚持下去。
You have quickly become one of the best presenters on YouTube, and one reason for it is that, unlike 95% of video bloggers, you do not pad your videos with superfluous information. You cut to the chase. A typical video on YouTube takes up the topic in its title about 40% into the video. Again, you cut to the chase from the git-go. Keep it up.
您很快就成为 YouTube 上最出色的主持人之一，原因之一是，与 95% 的视频博主不同，您不会在视频中添加多余的信息。您直奔主题。YouTube 上的典型视频在标题中占据了约 40% 的话题。同样，您从一开始就切入正题。坚持下去。
@dons6556
Yes, the Japanese and Korean can build ships much faster than us. However, if we ask those companies to build in USA, it will be loss in translation! It will be Americans being hired to do the job, it will take decades to develop the workforce and a culture change. Look at the TSMC fab being build in AZ, major indigestion going on. unx construction workers much slower than what the Taiwanese are used to back home. Can’t find enough skilled workers to staff the fab. The fastest and cheapest way to get it done right now is to commission the ships to be built in Japan and Korea until we have reached a certain numbers AND, at the same time, start to build shipyards back in USA. Two decades from now, we might develop a small expensive military ship building domestic industry
是的，日本和韩国建造船舶的速度比我们快得多。但是，如果我们要求这些公司在美国建造，转换就会出现问题！我们将雇佣美国人来做这项工作，培养劳动力和文化变革将需要几十年的时间。看看台积电在亚利桑那州建造的工厂，情况严重恶化。工会建筑工人的速度比台湾（地区）人在家乡习惯的速度慢得多。找不到足够的熟练工人来为工厂配备人员。目前最快、最便宜的完成方法是委托日本和韩国建造舰船，直到达到一定数量，同时开始在美国建造造船厂。二十年后，我们可能会发展一个小型昂贵的国内军舰建造产业
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Yes, the Japanese and Korean can build ships much faster than us. However, if we ask those companies to build in USA, it will be loss in translation! It will be Americans being hired to do the job, it will take decades to develop the workforce and a culture change. Look at the TSMC fab being build in AZ, major indigestion going on. unx construction workers much slower than what the Taiwanese are used to back home. Can’t find enough skilled workers to staff the fab. The fastest and cheapest way to get it done right now is to commission the ships to be built in Japan and Korea until we have reached a certain numbers AND, at the same time, start to build shipyards back in USA. Two decades from now, we might develop a small expensive military ship building domestic industry
是的，日本和韩国建造船舶的速度比我们快得多。但是，如果我们要求这些公司在美国建造，转换就会出现问题！我们将雇佣美国人来做这项工作，培养劳动力和文化变革将需要几十年的时间。看看台积电在亚利桑那州建造的工厂，情况严重恶化。工会建筑工人的速度比台湾（地区）人在家乡习惯的速度慢得多。找不到足够的熟练工人来为工厂配备人员。目前最快、最便宜的完成方法是委托日本和韩国建造舰船，直到达到一定数量，同时开始在美国建造造船厂。二十年后，我们可能会发展一个小型昂贵的国内军舰建造产业
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@eymeeraosaka2954
Ultimately it all boils down to greed...
最终，一切都归结于贪婪……
Ultimately it all boils down to greed...
最终，一切都归结于贪婪……
@t.c.w.5088
The crux of everything is where are the skilled workers and manufacturing and supply chain to aid the Shipbuilding industry in the US.
一切的关键在于哪里有技术工人以及制造和供应链来协助美国造船业。
The crux of everything is where are the skilled workers and manufacturing and supply chain to aid the Shipbuilding industry in the US.
一切的关键在于哪里有技术工人以及制造和供应链来协助美国造船业。
@BernardinosFutbol
Kevin, apart from you impeccable analysis and lucid, but simple interpretation of complex economic issues, you have also inspired me to engage in more frequent and more meaningful prayer - God Bless
凯文，除了你对复杂经济问题的无可挑剔的分析和清晰而简单的解释之外，你还激励我进行更频繁、更有意义的祈祷——上帝保佑
Kevin, apart from you impeccable analysis and lucid, but simple interpretation of complex economic issues, you have also inspired me to engage in more frequent and more meaningful prayer - God Bless
凯文，除了你对复杂经济问题的无可挑剔的分析和清晰而简单的解释之外，你还激励我进行更频繁、更有意义的祈祷——上帝保佑
@donkeykong516
Difference of today & 50 years ago is that in back then China was behind in technology. Today China is on par with US in technology. China wins because it has the tech, human resources, and also material resources.
今天和50年前的区别在于，当时中国在技术上落后。今天中国在技术上与美国不相上下。中国之所以获胜，是因为它拥有技术、人力资源和物质资源。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Difference of today & 50 years ago is that in back then China was behind in technology. Today China is on par with US in technology. China wins because it has the tech, human resources, and also material resources.
今天和50年前的区别在于，当时中国在技术上落后。今天中国在技术上与美国不相上下。中国之所以获胜，是因为它拥有技术、人力资源和物质资源。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@pyap01
Heard about the consequences of the imbalances between corporate power and people power creating the current set of problems.
听说企业权力和民众权力之间的不平衡造成了当前一系列问题的后果。
Heard about the consequences of the imbalances between corporate power and people power creating the current set of problems.
听说企业权力和民众权力之间的不平衡造成了当前一系列问题的后果。
@khooyeesin9766
US and allies are thinking more of making super profits from each other
美国及其盟友更多地考虑从彼此身上获取巨额利润
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
US and allies are thinking more of making super profits from each other
美国及其盟友更多地考虑从彼此身上获取巨额利润
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@moreless2690
9:56 Is it not about spending lots of money? The Pentagon has consistently failed its annual audit for six years in a row, despite the massive undertaking trillion of dollars. Which wasn't a surprise.
9:56处 难道不是花了很多钱吗？尽管花费了数万亿美元，但五角大楼连续六年未能通过年度审计。这并不奇怪。
9:56 Is it not about spending lots of money? The Pentagon has consistently failed its annual audit for six years in a row, despite the massive undertaking trillion of dollars. Which wasn't a surprise.
9:56处 难道不是花了很多钱吗？尽管花费了数万亿美元，但五角大楼连续六年未能通过年度审计。这并不奇怪。
@adder88
In a globalized world, there is no need to take things too seriously. Outsourcing the manufacturing of ships and warships directly to China at a cost of only 20% to maximize profits is a win-win situation.
全球化的世界，没必要太过严肃，把船舶、军舰的制造直接外包给中国，成本只有20%，利润最大化，是双赢的局面。
In a globalized world, there is no need to take things too seriously. Outsourcing the manufacturing of ships and warships directly to China at a cost of only 20% to maximize profits is a win-win situation.
全球化的世界，没必要太过严肃，把船舶、军舰的制造直接外包给中国，成本只有20%，利润最大化，是双赢的局面。
@Zerpentsa6598
Japan: Yeah, we could build ships in US like Boeing build 738 Max.
日本：是的，我们可以在美国建造船舶，就像波音建造 738 Max 一样。
Japan: Yeah, we could build ships in US like Boeing build 738 Max.
日本：是的，我们可以在美国建造船舶，就像波音建造 738 Max 一样。
@gelinrefira
It is true that the US does have a lot of mothballed shipyards. But bringing them up to modern standards and equipping them, hiring the people (if there are even enough qualified people) and create the entire supply chain to reactivate these shipyards is a pipe dream. If the US can't even muster the organization, resources, capital to even re-scale their semiconductor industry up to match even a fraction of that China has, then what credential do they have to say they can do the same for these shipyards to match the capacity of China? At a lower cost, since they want to copy China's model of dual use for civilian and military? Fat chance.
确实，美国有很多停工的造船厂。但让它们达到现代标准，配备设备，雇佣员工（如果有足够的合格人员的话）并建立整个供应链以重新启用这些造船厂，这都是白日梦。如果美国甚至无法召集组织、资源和资本来重新扩大其半导体产业，使其达到中国水平的一小部分，那么他们有什么资格说他们可以让这些造船厂达到中国水平？以更低的成本，因为他们想复制中国的军民两用模式？机会渺茫。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It is true that the US does have a lot of mothballed shipyards. But bringing them up to modern standards and equipping them, hiring the people (if there are even enough qualified people) and create the entire supply chain to reactivate these shipyards is a pipe dream. If the US can't even muster the organization, resources, capital to even re-scale their semiconductor industry up to match even a fraction of that China has, then what credential do they have to say they can do the same for these shipyards to match the capacity of China? At a lower cost, since they want to copy China's model of dual use for civilian and military? Fat chance.
确实，美国有很多停工的造船厂。但让它们达到现代标准，配备设备，雇佣员工（如果有足够的合格人员的话）并建立整个供应链以重新启用这些造船厂，这都是白日梦。如果美国甚至无法召集组织、资源和资本来重新扩大其半导体产业，使其达到中国水平的一小部分，那么他们有什么资格说他们可以让这些造船厂达到中国水平？以更低的成本，因为他们想复制中国的军民两用模式？机会渺茫。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
This is in the context that China is barely even using the capacity of their entire shipbuilding industry to build their warships. If China gets serious and they are willing to take an economic hit to convert their civilian ship orders to warship orders, they can churn out warships several times faster than what they are doing now. And what they are doing now is already outstripping US, Japan and South Korea warship building.
这是因为中国甚至还没有充分利用其整个造船业的产能来建造军舰。如果中国认真起来，愿意承受经济打击将民用船舶订单转换为军舰订单，那么他们就能以比现在快几倍的速度生产军舰。他们现在的军舰建造速度已经超过了美国、日本和韩国。
这是因为中国甚至还没有充分利用其整个造船业的产能来建造军舰。如果中国认真起来，愿意承受经济打击将民用船舶订单转换为军舰订单，那么他们就能以比现在快几倍的速度生产军舰。他们现在的军舰建造速度已经超过了美国、日本和韩国。
If China really get serious, for every ship US, South and Japan, even Europe can build, China can build a dozen. By the time the collective west can assemble an armada to invade China, assuming that if the collective west did not collapse from economic disaster of full decoupling from China and the world, China would have built 10 times that armada. For every anti-missile missile the west can load up in their VLS, China can build and launch 20 anti-ship missiles at them.
This is not even a contest.
如果中国真的认真的话，美国、韩国、日本甚至欧洲能造出的每一艘船，中国都能造出一打。假设西方国家没有因为与中国和世界完全脱钩的经济灾难而崩溃，那么到西方集体组建一支舰队入侵中国的时候，中国将建立10倍于西方的舰队。对于西方可以装在垂直发射系统上的每一枚反导导弹，中国可以制造并发射20枚反舰导弹。
这根本就称不上是比赛。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
This is not even a contest.
如果中国真的认真的话，美国、韩国、日本甚至欧洲能造出的每一艘船，中国都能造出一打。假设西方国家没有因为与中国和世界完全脱钩的经济灾难而崩溃，那么到西方集体组建一支舰队入侵中国的时候，中国将建立10倍于西方的舰队。对于西方可以装在垂直发射系统上的每一枚反导导弹，中国可以制造并发射20枚反舰导弹。
这根本就称不上是比赛。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
很赞 21
收藏