印度军舰到底有多强?
正文翻译
India's warships are the most advanced out of all South Asian countries.
在整个南亚地区，印度的军舰是最先进的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
India's warships are the most advanced out of all South Asian countries.
在整个南亚地区，印度的军舰是最先进的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
评论翻译
评论部分：
@BehindAsia
How strong do you think Indian warships are?
你认为印度的军舰到底有多强？
How strong do you think Indian warships are?
你认为印度的军舰到底有多强？
@amanjha5111
Brother, not to mention You forgot two active Aircraft Carriers, Delhi class destroyers were not enhanced Godavari class Delhi class are Destroyers while Godavari class are frigates.
兄弟，先别说你忘了那两艘现役的航空母舰了，还有德里级驱逐舰可不是什么哥达瓦里级的升级版啊，德里级可是驱逐舰，而哥达瓦里级则属于护卫舰。
Brother, not to mention You forgot two active Aircraft Carriers, Delhi class destroyers were not enhanced Godavari class Delhi class are Destroyers while Godavari class are frigates.
兄弟，先别说你忘了那两艘现役的航空母舰了，还有德里级驱逐舰可不是什么哥达瓦里级的升级版啊，德里级可是驱逐舰，而哥达瓦里级则属于护卫舰。
There indeed was an order for enhanced Godavari class but it was named Brahmaputra class designated to build frigates.
虽然确实有增强型哥达瓦里级的订单，但它被命名为布拉马普特拉级，是专门用来建造护卫舰的。
虽然确实有增强型哥达瓦里级的订单，但它被命名为布拉马普特拉级，是专门用来建造护卫舰的。
@amanjha5111
And you forgot these ships currently active in service : Rajput Class Destroyers , Brahmaputra Class Frigates , Khukri Class , Veer Class , Abhay class Corvettes and Arihant Class , Kilo Class , Type 209 Class and Scorpene Class of SSBNs and SSKs respectively
你还遗漏了一些现役的印度舰船，比如：拉吉普特级驱逐舰、布拉马普特拉级护卫舰、库克里级、维尔级、阿巴伊级轻型护卫舰以及歼敌者级、基洛级、209型战略核潜艇和鲉鱼级柴电潜艇等等。
And you forgot these ships currently active in service : Rajput Class Destroyers , Brahmaputra Class Frigates , Khukri Class , Veer Class , Abhay class Corvettes and Arihant Class , Kilo Class , Type 209 Class and Scorpene Class of SSBNs and SSKs respectively
你还遗漏了一些现役的印度舰船，比如：拉吉普特级驱逐舰、布拉马普特拉级护卫舰、库克里级、维尔级、阿巴伊级轻型护卫舰以及歼敌者级、基洛级、209型战略核潜艇和鲉鱼级柴电潜艇等等。
@jithanandsv8408
you didn't include submarines and aircraft carriers of INDIAN NAVY
你遗漏了印度海军的潜艇和航空母舰。
you didn't include submarines and aircraft carriers of INDIAN NAVY
你遗漏了印度海军的潜艇和航空母舰。
@adder88
From a technical perspective, the Indian Navy is not a match for Japan or South Korea.
从技术层面上来说，印度海军不是日本或韩国的对手。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
From a technical perspective, the Indian Navy is not a match for Japan or South Korea.
从技术层面上来说，印度海军不是日本或韩国的对手。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Talushallux1
Your question at 0.45 'India just a regional navy or one that can take on a superpower like China?' is answered by a recent news event.
你在0.45提的问题是，“印度海军只能算是一支区域性的海军，还是一支能够与像中国这样的超级大国一较高下的强大海军？”最近发生的一件重大新闻事件给出了答案。
Your question at 0.45 'India just a regional navy or one that can take on a superpower like China?' is answered by a recent news event.
你在0.45提的问题是，“印度海军只能算是一支区域性的海军，还是一支能够与像中国这样的超级大国一较高下的强大海军？”最近发生的一件重大新闻事件给出了答案。
When the Houthis attacked the Chinese fleet, it was the Indian navy which rescued the Chinese, despite China having a naval base in Djibouti and full supplies and naval power, close by. China had neither thanked India nor will it acknowledge the incident.
（笔者按：以下‘新闻’ 情节纯属虚构和臆想）当胡塞武装攻击中国船队的时候，是印度海军挺身而出，成功解救了中国人，尽管中国在吉布提设有一座海军基地，而且附近有充裕的物资补给以及强大的海军力量。中国方面不仅未对印度表达丝毫的感激之情，甚至矢口否认曾经发生过这一事件。
（笔者按：以下‘新闻’ 情节纯属虚构和臆想）当胡塞武装攻击中国船队的时候，是印度海军挺身而出，成功解救了中国人，尽管中国在吉布提设有一座海军基地，而且附近有充裕的物资补给以及强大的海军力量。中国方面不仅未对印度表达丝毫的感激之情，甚至矢口否认曾经发生过这一事件。
The same happened with C UN peacekeeping troops in South Sudan. They fled and took shelter in the UN mission. Indian forces saved the C troops from local militia fighters who they were supposed to fight! Having numbers is not the same as having the will or courage to fight
无独有偶，C驻南苏丹维和部队也遭遇过类似的状况。他们直接跑去联合国使团避难。又是印度军队将C军队从当地民兵手中解救出来的，而他们本来应该与之作战的。由此可见，拥有庞大的人数，并不能等同于具备顽强的战斗意志或者无畏的勇气。
无独有偶，C驻南苏丹维和部队也遭遇过类似的状况。他们直接跑去联合国使团避难。又是印度军队将C军队从当地民兵手中解救出来的，而他们本来应该与之作战的。由此可见，拥有庞大的人数，并不能等同于具备顽强的战斗意志或者无畏的勇气。
@hokieplaya
Yeah India still has a regional navy. No presence or influence outside of Arabian Sea, northern Indian Ocean and Bay of Bengal. Yemen coast is a lot closer to India than China.
没错，印度海军确实是一支区域性海军。其影响力主要局限于阿拉伯海、北印度洋以及孟加拉湾等有限区域内，也门海岸线距离印度远比距离中国要近得多。
Yeah India still has a regional navy. No presence or influence outside of Arabian Sea, northern Indian Ocean and Bay of Bengal. Yemen coast is a lot closer to India than China.
没错，印度海军确实是一支区域性海军。其影响力主要局限于阿拉伯海、北印度洋以及孟加拉湾等有限区域内，也门海岸线距离印度远比距离中国要近得多。
@galluer @hokieplaya
What's your point? Conflicts exist where they exist. India responded and consolidated. Listen to some of the FPV accounts of those pirates when IN arrived.
你的观点是什么？只要是有冲突的地方，就难免会有冲突出现。只不过印度迅速做出了反应并加强了防护，不妨听听那些海盗们的快艇在印度抵达后的真实描述吧。
What's your point? Conflicts exist where they exist. India responded and consolidated. Listen to some of the FPV accounts of those pirates when IN arrived.
你的观点是什么？只要是有冲突的地方，就难免会有冲突出现。只不过印度迅速做出了反应并加强了防护，不妨听听那些海盗们的快艇在印度抵达后的真实描述吧。
@hokieplaya @galluer
my point? I was responding to the youtuber’s question if India is a regional navy or a blue water force that can take on superpowers like China or the US far from its shores.
我的观点？我只是在回答网友的问题，印度海军是一支区域性的海军，还是一支可以在远离海岸的海域，与像中国或美国这样的超级大国一较高下的蓝水海军。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
my point? I was responding to the youtuber’s question if India is a regional navy or a blue water force that can take on superpowers like China or the US far from its shores.
我的观点？我只是在回答网友的问题，印度海军是一支区域性的海军，还是一支可以在远离海岸的海域，与像中国或美国这样的超级大国一较高下的蓝水海军。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Taking out militias relatively close to its shores is a regional power level achievement. We’ll talk superpower level blue water force when IN can duke it out with adversaries in the Atlantic and Pacific.
剿灭那些距离海岸线很近的民兵，也只能算作一种区域性的力量成就，要等到印度真的能和大西洋、太平洋的对手决一死战时，我们再来探讨超级大国级别的蓝水海军。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
剿灭那些距离海岸线很近的民兵，也只能算作一种区域性的力量成就，要等到印度真的能和大西洋、太平洋的对手决一死战时，我们再来探讨超级大国级别的蓝水海军。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@aarthirajaraman7453 @hokieplaya
India isn't trying to project power, what's the point of pushing around Iraq when China and Pakistan are at our door
印度从未有过向外投射自身力量的意图。当中国和巴基斯坦就在我们家门口的情况下，在伊拉克周边搞些小动作又能有什么实际意义呢？
India isn't trying to project power, what's the point of pushing around Iraq when China and Pakistan are at our door
印度从未有过向外投射自身力量的意图。当中国和巴基斯坦就在我们家门口的情况下，在伊拉克周边搞些小动作又能有什么实际意义呢？
@arunkris7299
Next to Japan, India is only asian country which used aircraft carrier in real war
除去日本之外，印度是唯一在实战中动用过航空母舰的亚洲国家。
Next to Japan, India is only asian country which used aircraft carrier in real war
除去日本之外，印度是唯一在实战中动用过航空母舰的亚洲国家。
@robinrahul2176
Japan carrier can't take aircarft for operation as it is only design for helicopter operation...
由于它的设计只是用于直升机作战，日本的航母根本无法搭载固定翼飞战机作战。
Japan carrier can't take aircarft for operation as it is only design for helicopter operation...
由于它的设计只是用于直升机作战，日本的航母根本无法搭载固定翼飞战机作战。
@arunkris7299
yeah man i forgot that great nation , once upon time imperial japanese navy dominated pacific ocean, but after ww2 it lost it's potential to usa as self defence, precisely india can be 1st in south asia
哦对了，差点忘了那个伟大的国家了，日本帝国海军当年曾经称霸过太平洋，只可惜自二战结束以后，它便在自卫领域彻底输给了美国。确切地说，印度可以成为南亚第一。
yeah man i forgot that great nation , once upon time imperial japanese navy dominated pacific ocean, but after ww2 it lost it's potential to usa as self defence, precisely india can be 1st in south asia
哦对了，差点忘了那个伟大的国家了，日本帝国海军当年曾经称霸过太平洋，只可惜自二战结束以后，它便在自卫领域彻底输给了美国。确切地说，印度可以成为南亚第一。
@Balamua_banaras_wala
We have one old aircraft ,one new aircraft
我们有一架老旧的飞机，一架崭新的飞机。
We have one old aircraft ,one new aircraft
我们有一架老旧的飞机，一架崭新的飞机。
@ThakurKunalSingh-wg5kp
Post WW2 Indian Navy has used Aircraft Carriers in war & imposing successful Naval Blockades not Japanese Navy. Also it's the Indian Navy which is armed with Nuclear Weapons and not dependent upon foreign Navy for Nuclear Detterence or Offense.
二次大战过后，印度海军在一系列战争中运用航空母舰，成功实施了海上封锁，这可比日本海军厉害多了。不仅如此，印度海军还装备了核武器，不需要依靠外国海军就能实现核威慑或者核攻击。
Post WW2 Indian Navy has used Aircraft Carriers in war & imposing successful Naval Blockades not Japanese Navy. Also it's the Indian Navy which is armed with Nuclear Weapons and not dependent upon foreign Navy for Nuclear Detterence or Offense.
二次大战过后，印度海军在一系列战争中运用航空母舰，成功实施了海上封锁，这可比日本海军厉害多了。不仅如此，印度海军还装备了核武器，不需要依靠外国海军就能实现核威慑或者核攻击。
@rupeshjha0
I think you forgot Aircraft Carrier's of India
我想你忘记了印度的航空母舰了。
I think you forgot Aircraft Carrier's of India
我想你忘记了印度的航空母舰了。
@arikhanaalffie
China knows India is not of 1962 and Britain and America knows India is not 1971, now is very powerful.
中国肯定清楚印度不再是1962年的印度了，英国和美国也明白印度早已不是1971年的印度，现在的印度非常强大。
China knows India is not of 1962 and Britain and America knows India is not 1971, now is very powerful.
中国肯定清楚印度不再是1962年的印度了，英国和美国也明白印度早已不是1971年的印度，现在的印度非常强大。
@isleephungry
very powerful with the mouth
嘴巴非常非常强大。
very powerful with the mouth
嘴巴非常非常强大。
@ClashWithArthur
India's Warships | How Strong is it?
印度军舰到底有多强?
India's Warships | How Strong is it?
印度军舰到底有多强?
@KaushikSarkar-uo2lt @ClashWithArthur
very strong, so strong that US is satisfied to find IN taking on Chinese navy in Indo-Pacific.
极其强大，强大到连美国都心满意足地察觉到，印度已经具备了在印太地区与中国海军一决高下的能力。
very strong, so strong that US is satisfied to find IN taking on Chinese navy in Indo-Pacific.
极其强大，强大到连美国都心满意足地察觉到，印度已经具备了在印太地区与中国海军一决高下的能力。
@abhijitgupta9031
Just launched the 2nd nuclear powered submarine yesterday. One more being manufactured.
就在昨天，印度的第二艘核动力潜艇下水了。还有另外一艘正在建造当中。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Just launched the 2nd nuclear powered submarine yesterday. One more being manufactured.
就在昨天，印度的第二艘核动力潜艇下水了。还有另外一艘正在建造当中。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@anuparnoacharya5779
That's not under indian navy. That's completely different segment.
这些潜艇并非处于印度海军的管辖之下。它们隶属于一个截然不同的部分。
That's not under indian navy. That's completely different segment.
这些潜艇并非处于印度海军的管辖之下。它们隶属于一个截然不同的部分。
@josephgeorge641
That's under the Indian nuclear triad not the navy
那是隶属于印度的核三位一体之下，而不是隶属于海军。
That's under the Indian nuclear triad not the navy
那是隶属于印度的核三位一体之下，而不是隶属于海军。
@chinmayfuloria6589 @josephgeorge641
isn't submarines the part of navy means I know that ins arihant and arigat comes under nuclear traid directly reporting to pm but still??
难道说潜艇并不属于海军的一部分吗？据我所知，阿里汉特和阿里加特等舰艇确实归属于核三位一体，并且直接向总理汇报工作。
isn't submarines the part of navy means I know that ins arihant and arigat comes under nuclear traid directly reporting to pm but still??
难道说潜艇并不属于海军的一部分吗？据我所知，阿里汉特和阿里加特等舰艇确实归属于核三位一体，并且直接向总理汇报工作。
@atharvzemse6599 @josephgeorge641
Those submarines are operated by Indian Navy. And are part of Strategic forces command and not under eastern or western fleet like rest of the warships.
这些潜艇实际上是由印度海军来操控的。它们是属于战略部队指挥下的一部分，与其他常规军舰有所不同，既不属于东部舰队，也不隶属于西部舰队。
Those submarines are operated by Indian Navy. And are part of Strategic forces command and not under eastern or western fleet like rest of the warships.
这些潜艇实际上是由印度海军来操控的。它们是属于战略部队指挥下的一部分，与其他常规军舰有所不同，既不属于东部舰队，也不隶属于西部舰队。
@enlightnedsoul4124
Indian Navy will soon become the world's second largest Navy.. Mark my words. Comeback here on june 2026
印度海军很快就要跃居世界第二大海军了。一定要记住我的话，2026年6月，咱们再来看结果吧。
Indian Navy will soon become the world's second largest Navy.. Mark my words. Comeback here on june 2026
印度海军很快就要跃居世界第二大海军了。一定要记住我的话，2026年6月，咱们再来看结果吧。
@lovedietfood7@Primerare1111
I have been following defense news for about 4 years for now , and I don't think there's any way we can achieve that by 2026 unless we start inducting fishing boats in our fleet .
我一直都在关注国防新闻，到目前为止，大概有四年时间了吧，我个人觉得要想在2026年前实现这个目标，除非我们开始把渔船也编入我们的舰队才行。
I have been following defense news for about 4 years for now , and I don't think there's any way we can achieve that by 2026 unless we start inducting fishing boats in our fleet .
我一直都在关注国防新闻，到目前为止，大概有四年时间了吧，我个人觉得要想在2026年前实现这个目标，除非我们开始把渔船也编入我们的舰队才行。
@devanshsanghavi9999
Next gen. Distroyers will have Japanese tech. Radar which look like pole which reduce radar cross section of ship.
下一代驱逐舰将会采用日本的先进技术，雷达外观就好似一根杆子一般，能够降低舰艇的雷达横截面。
Next gen. Distroyers will have Japanese tech. Radar which look like pole which reduce radar cross section of ship.
下一代驱逐舰将会采用日本的先进技术，雷达外观就好似一根杆子一般，能够降低舰艇的雷达横截面。
@OMKARKULKARNIorkul1991
India has two operational aircraft carrier , third soon be under production.
印度目前有两艘现役航母，而且第三艘马上就要开工了。
India has two operational aircraft carrier , third soon be under production.
印度目前有两艘现役航母，而且第三艘马上就要开工了。
India also has two super deadly Nuclear Submarines which can Nuclear strike anywhere in the world completing nuclear triad of India.
印度还有两艘超级致命的核潜艇，它们具备对全球任何地方进行核打击的能力，从而构建起印度完整的核三位一体体系。
印度还有两艘超级致命的核潜艇，它们具备对全球任何地方进行核打击的能力，从而构建起印度完整的核三位一体体系。
India already has MIRV based ICBM which has global reach.
印度已经拥有具有全球影响力的分导式多弹头洲际弹道导弹。
印度已经拥有具有全球影响力的分导式多弹头洲际弹道导弹。
@Nexus_Trinity
What about nilgiri class frigates
尼尔吉里级护卫舰怎么样。
What about nilgiri class frigates
尼尔吉里级护卫舰怎么样。
@GuillotineDestroyer
Nilgiri is not made by India go and do your studies
尼尔吉里可不是印度制造的，好好去研究一下吧。
Nilgiri is not made by India go and do your studies
尼尔吉里可不是印度制造的，好好去研究一下吧。
@riffgbvssdf @GuillotineDestroyer
the one you are talking about maybe its the Talwar class frigate half of them are being built in russian and the other in india for fast construction
也许你想说的可能是塔尔瓦尔级护卫舰，这其中有一半是在俄罗斯建造的，另外一半则是由印度快速建造的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
the one you are talking about maybe its the Talwar class frigate half of them are being built in russian and the other in india for fast construction
也许你想说的可能是塔尔瓦尔级护卫舰，这其中有一半是在俄罗斯建造的，另外一半则是由印度快速建造的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Lethalweapon612
Aircraft carriers one Indigenously devloped with Indias technology and Second is A Russian one!
还有两艘航空母舰，其中一艘是用印度技术自主研发的，另外一艘则源自于俄罗斯。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Aircraft carriers one Indigenously devloped with Indias technology and Second is A Russian one!
还有两艘航空母舰，其中一艘是用印度技术自主研发的，另外一艘则源自于俄罗斯。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Construction of 3rd Aircraft carrier will start in next 2 years which will be Nuclear powered and very advanced technology!
第三艘航空母舰预计在接下来的两年内开建，而且还是核动力的，技术非常先进！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
第三艘航空母舰预计在接下来的两年内开建，而且还是核动力的，技术非常先进！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Also india have 2 nuclear anti stealth submarines aswell by 2030 anothe 4 Nuclear submarines will be added!
印度还有两艘隐形核潜艇，到2030年预计还要增加四艘核潜艇！
印度还有两艘隐形核潜艇，到2030年预计还要增加四艘核潜艇！
@Pooh-rh7pg
U should have included indian made nuclear ballistic missile submarines and aircraft carrier.
你得把印度自己制造的弹道导弹核潜艇和航空母舰也算进去。
U should have included indian made nuclear ballistic missile submarines and aircraft carrier.
你得把印度自己制造的弹道导弹核潜艇和航空母舰也算进去。
@Nirvana_rocks007
no cruisers are a risky affair in todays time and india cant quite afford them right now
时至今日，海军缺乏巡洋舰是极其危险的，现在印度还负担不起。
no cruisers are a risky affair in todays time and india cant quite afford them right now
时至今日，海军缺乏巡洋舰是极其危险的，现在印度还负担不起。
@male-efficient7262
Future destroyers will be a size of cruisers as future frigates are planned to be of same displacement to that of current destroyers in the Indian navy.
未来的驱逐舰将会变得跟巡洋舰差不多大，因为未来的护卫舰计划跟印度海军现有的驱逐舰排水量是一样的。
Future destroyers will be a size of cruisers as future frigates are planned to be of same displacement to that of current destroyers in the Indian navy.
未来的驱逐舰将会变得跟巡洋舰差不多大，因为未来的护卫舰计划跟印度海军现有的驱逐舰排水量是一样的。
@chinmayfuloria6589
can anyone explain me why indonessia and north korea is ahaead of india in naval power when literally both don't even have a aircraft carrier and mcuh destroyers and indoneesia is not even nuclear capable then wh??
有人能解释一下为什么印尼和朝鲜在海军实力方面竟然能超越印度呢？事实上，这两个国家连航母和驱逐舰都没有，印尼甚至连核武器都没有，那到底是怎么回事呢？
can anyone explain me why indonessia and north korea is ahaead of india in naval power when literally both don't even have a aircraft carrier and mcuh destroyers and indoneesia is not even nuclear capable then wh??
有人能解释一下为什么印尼和朝鲜在海军实力方面竟然能超越印度呢？事实上，这两个国家连航母和驱逐舰都没有，印尼甚至连核武器都没有，那到底是怎么回事呢？
@Rizky3095
If it's not battle proven we won't know it.
如果没有经过实战检验，我们是不会知道的。
If it's not battle proven we won't know it.
如果没有经过实战检验，我们是不会知道的。
@okman9684 @Rizky3095
by that logic f35 aircraft and Nimitz class aircraft carriers are not battle tested.
照这么说的话，f 35飞机和尼米兹级航空母舰也没有经历过实战检验。
by that logic f35 aircraft and Nimitz class aircraft carriers are not battle tested.
照这么说的话，f 35飞机和尼米兹级航空母舰也没有经历过实战检验。
During war countries economy will be more of an important factor than its arsenals because no country puts its army at full capacity all the time.
一旦爆发战争，一个国家的经济实力往往比庞大的武器库更重要，因为没有哪个国家的军队能够一直处于满负荷运转的战斗状态。
一旦爆发战争，一个国家的经济实力往往比庞大的武器库更重要，因为没有哪个国家的军队能够一直处于满负荷运转的战斗状态。
During war a country shifts into a war time economy where they produce the same weapons in mass which they have now in less number. Look at Russia it is producing more tanks now than it had before with upgrades appropriate for the war.
一旦爆发战争，整个国家便会迅速切换至战时经济模式。他们会大规模生产平时产量很少的同款武器。看看俄罗斯，它现在生产的坦克比以前更多了，而且在性能上还进行了适应战争环境的升级。
一旦爆发战争，整个国家便会迅速切换至战时经济模式。他们会大规模生产平时产量很少的同款武器。看看俄罗斯，它现在生产的坦克比以前更多了，而且在性能上还进行了适应战争环境的升级。
So no weapon can be battle tested for all terrain. In a war the country modifies and mass manufacturers its weapons that can change the quantity and characteristics of the weapons. Russian weapons before and after war are very different even though they have the same core design
所以说，没有一种武器能够在所有地形上都通过实战检验。在战争中，国家会对武器进行改良和大规模生产，这样就能改变武器的数量和性能特点。俄罗斯的武器在战前和战后可谓是天差地别，尽管它们的核心设计都是一样的。
所以说，没有一种武器能够在所有地形上都通过实战检验。在战争中，国家会对武器进行改良和大规模生产，这样就能改变武器的数量和性能特点。俄罗斯的武器在战前和战后可谓是天差地别，尽管它们的核心设计都是一样的。
@sankalp344 @okman9684
they will give any point without thinking once .... We can even say that american equipment is inferior because we defeated pakistan many times and they were the user of american equipment
他们会不假思索地给出各种评价……我甚至可以说美国的装备是次品，因为我们多次战胜过使用美国装备的巴基斯坦。
they will give any point without thinking once .... We can even say that american equipment is inferior because we defeated pakistan many times and they were the user of american equipment
他们会不假思索地给出各种评价……我甚至可以说美国的装备是次品，因为我们多次战胜过使用美国装备的巴基斯坦。
@ngamtokkonyak1784
Since cold war no country has combat experience..
自从冷战结束以后，没有一个国家有实战经验。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Since cold war no country has combat experience..
自从冷战结束以后，没有一个国家有实战经验。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Hello-kh6bk
India has fought 5 wars with multiple conflicts where Indian Navy has played critical role in the independence of Bangladesh and Destroying Pakistani Warships and Submarines which was helped US and UK
印度已经打过5场战争，并发生过多次冲突。印度海军在孟加拉国争取独立的过程中，以及在击溃巴基斯坦军舰、潜艇的行动里，都发挥了关键的作用。而巴基斯坦还得到了美国和英国的帮助。
India has fought 5 wars with multiple conflicts where Indian Navy has played critical role in the independence of Bangladesh and Destroying Pakistani Warships and Submarines which was helped US and UK
印度已经打过5场战争，并发生过多次冲突。印度海军在孟加拉国争取独立的过程中，以及在击溃巴基斯坦军舰、潜艇的行动里，都发挥了关键的作用。而巴基斯坦还得到了美国和英国的帮助。
@abhijeetkundu7123
Who protected ships from Houthis? USA failed to provide security. It was India.
是谁在保护船只免受也门胡塞武装的袭击？美国根本就没有提供任何安全保障，还得靠印度啊！
Who protected ships from Houthis? USA failed to provide security. It was India.
是谁在保护船只免受也门胡塞武装的袭击？美国根本就没有提供任何安全保障，还得靠印度啊！
@andrewlin6136
Still it cannot counter US
印度仍然难以与美国相抗衡。
Still it cannot counter US
印度仍然难以与美国相抗衡。
@Omnitaku7
We don't need to counter the US because we are not hostile towards the US on the other hand US is our strategic partner
我们没有必要对抗美国，因为我们对美国并没有敌意，另一方面，美国还是我们的战略合作伙伴。
We don't need to counter the US because we are not hostile towards the US on the other hand US is our strategic partner
我们没有必要对抗美国，因为我们对美国并没有敌意，另一方面，美国还是我们的战略合作伙伴。
@Omnitaku7
Why is there a poop emoji in your comment does it represent that you're a poop?
为什么你的评论里出现那个便便的表情符号？难道说它代表你就是一坨便便吗？
Why is there a poop emoji in your comment does it represent that you're a poop?
为什么你的评论里出现那个便便的表情符号？难道说它代表你就是一坨便便吗？
@andrewlin6136 @Omnitaku7
Yes, I can see them clearly, just like Indian standing outside Taj hotel, saluting anyone going inside
没错，我能看得清清楚楚，就像印度人站在泰姬酒店门口，逢人就鞠躬表示敬意一样。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Yes, I can see them clearly, just like Indian standing outside Taj hotel, saluting anyone going inside
没错，我能看得清清楚楚，就像印度人站在泰姬酒店门口，逢人就鞠躬表示敬意一样。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Omnitaku7
just being the largest Democracy is a big thing. And if we become hostile towards the US then the US will lose its single friend in Asia who can rival China in growth rate, economy and military power.
成为全球最大的民主国家可是一件大事，如果我们对美国人怀有敌意的话，那么美国势必会丧失他们在亚洲的唯一朋友，而只有后者，才能在经济增长率、经济实力以及军事力量上与中国相抗衡。
just being the largest Democracy is a big thing. And if we become hostile towards the US then the US will lose its single friend in Asia who can rival China in growth rate, economy and military power.
成为全球最大的民主国家可是一件大事，如果我们对美国人怀有敌意的话，那么美国势必会丧失他们在亚洲的唯一朋友，而只有后者，才能在经济增长率、经济实力以及军事力量上与中国相抗衡。
@andrewlin6136
India cannot solve the issue between china and India without US helps
如果没有美国的帮助，印度是没办法解决中印之间的问题的。
India cannot solve the issue between china and India without US helps
如果没有美国的帮助，印度是没办法解决中印之间的问题的。
@kthapa9697 @andrewlin6136
nd we don't trust usa at all few decade ago usa 7th fleet was here nd in today's world u r talking abt cooperation thts god india Russia friendship is still intact
我们根本不相信美国，几十年前美国第七舰队就在这里横行霸道，而今时今日，你们却口口声声谈合作。要知道，这世间唯有神灵、印度以及俄罗斯之间的情谊坚如磐石！
nd we don't trust usa at all few decade ago usa 7th fleet was here nd in today's world u r talking abt cooperation thts god india Russia friendship is still intact
我们根本不相信美国，几十年前美国第七舰队就在这里横行霸道，而今时今日，你们却口口声声谈合作。要知道，这世间唯有神灵、印度以及俄罗斯之间的情谊坚如磐石！
@kthapa9697 @andrewlin6136
Russia is okay but not usa why india is building it's military 4 largest military 5 largest economy one of biggest manufacturing country india doesn't want be on usa side thts for sure
俄罗斯倒是还好，但是美国那就不行了。为什么印度要大力发展自己的军事力量呢？第四大的军事力量，第五大的经济体，还有最大的制造业大国之一，印度当然不会站在美国一边了，这是毋庸置疑的。
Russia is okay but not usa why india is building it's military 4 largest military 5 largest economy one of biggest manufacturing country india doesn't want be on usa side thts for sure
俄罗斯倒是还好，但是美国那就不行了。为什么印度要大力发展自己的军事力量呢？第四大的军事力量，第五大的经济体，还有最大的制造业大国之一，印度当然不会站在美国一边了，这是毋庸置疑的。
@andrewlin6136 @kthapa9697
why don't you trust us Americans
你为什么不相信我们美国人。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
why don't you trust us Americans
你为什么不相信我们美国人。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@kthapa9697 @KhebozkihoSwu-lo5eq
back few decades ago we never thought tht the 7th fleet of usa who came to bay of Bengal to attack india now in 2024 ll be talking abt partnership so anything can happn
几十年前，我们压根儿就没想到过，这支进犯到孟加拉湾袭击印度的美国第七舰队，2024年的时候竟然会转而谈论起合作伙伴关系来，所以一切都有可能发生。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
back few decades ago we never thought tht the 7th fleet of usa who came to bay of Bengal to attack india now in 2024 ll be talking abt partnership so anything can happn
几十年前，我们压根儿就没想到过，这支进犯到孟加拉湾袭击印度的美国第七舰队，2024年的时候竟然会转而谈论起合作伙伴关系来，所以一切都有可能发生。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@sankalp344 @KhebozkihoSwu-lo5eq
We shot down F16 with a 50 year old Mig 21
我们用一架50年前制造的米格21战斗机，成功击落了F16。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
We shot down F16 with a 50 year old Mig 21
我们用一架50年前制造的米格21战斗机，成功击落了F16。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@AnkitKumar-dl2oo @andrewlin6136
Have you completed high school??We have managed a Chinese problem for 5 decades. There can be some conflict in the world without involving the US, don't you think?. Let's say you help us. Let's take out the US track record of solving wars
你高中没毕业吧？我们跟中国的问题已经纠缠了整整50年了。你不觉得世界上可能会出现一些没有美国参与的冲突事件吗？假如你真的愿意帮助我们，那就先让我们看看美国处理战争的历史记录吧。
Have you completed high school??We have managed a Chinese problem for 5 decades. There can be some conflict in the world without involving the US, don't you think?. Let's say you help us. Let's take out the US track record of solving wars
你高中没毕业吧？我们跟中国的问题已经纠缠了整整50年了。你不觉得世界上可能会出现一些没有美国参与的冲突事件吗？假如你真的愿意帮助我们，那就先让我们看看美国处理战争的历史记录吧。
Iraq war(not necessary), Vietnam War (Lost miserably), Afghanistan war ( Lost miserably). So with this track record thanks for offer but we are going to reject it. Byeee
伊拉克战争（没有必要）、越南战争（惨败）、阿富汗战争（惨败）。所以啊，从过去这些经验教训来看，很感激你的好意，但是我们还是决定拒绝这个提议，再见。
伊拉克战争（没有必要）、越南战争（惨败）、阿富汗战争（惨败）。所以啊，从过去这些经验教训来看，很感激你的好意，但是我们还是决定拒绝这个提议，再见。
@wwehighlights2879 @andrewlin6136
oh are you talking about that American airforce who lost against Vietnam and afghanistan. I think Americans have to know about their gender.
哦，你说的该不会是在越南战场和阿富汗战场上失利的美国空军吧？我觉得美国人必须好好了解下自己的性别。
oh are you talking about that American airforce who lost against Vietnam and afghanistan. I think Americans have to know about their gender.
哦，你说的该不会是在越南战场和阿富汗战场上失利的美国空军吧？我觉得美国人必须好好了解下自己的性别。
@greenhopper29
You seem to be an illiterate in international diplomacy and alliances.
看起来你对国际间的外交事务和同盟关系一无所知。
You seem to be an illiterate in international diplomacy and alliances.
看起来你对国际间的外交事务和同盟关系一无所知。
@parthamahanty8260 @andrewlin6136
Sorry I think You Have Forgot About 1971.
真是不好意思，我猜你可能是把1971年给忘了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Sorry I think You Have Forgot About 1971.
真是不好意思，我猜你可能是把1971年给忘了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Your Us Navy Along with UK Can't come close to Our Navy. Lost their face on International Domain. We Move our Army and navy We Made a New Country Bangladesh and You Move your navy And Army Still They Fled From Afganistan and Somalia.
当时你们美国的海军连同英国海军根本都没办法靠近我们的海军，在国际上丢尽了脸面。我们调集我们的陆军和海军，建立了一个新的国家孟加拉国。你们调集了你们的海军和陆军，可最后照样逃离了阿富汗和索马里。
当时你们美国的海军连同英国海军根本都没办法靠近我们的海军，在国际上丢尽了脸面。我们调集我们的陆军和海军，建立了一个新的国家孟加拉国。你们调集了你们的海军和陆军，可最后照样逃离了阿富汗和索马里。
@daredevil30000
Why should we counter US? We have no issues with US.
我们为什么要对抗美国？我们跟美国之间根本不存在任何矛盾。
Why should we counter US? We have no issues with US.
我们为什么要对抗美国？我们跟美国之间根本不存在任何矛盾。
@jkc3738
You make it sound like these warships are made in India? All the key components are imported.
你说得好像这些军舰都是由印度自主打造的？所有关键部件都是进口的。
You make it sound like these warships are made in India? All the key components are imported.
你说得好像这些军舰都是由印度自主打造的？所有关键部件都是进口的。
@abhisheksamal592
Not exactly. 70% of the products are indigenous including Sonar, Radar, Navigation and weapons, but not the engines
不完全是。其中70%的零部件都是国产的，包括声纳、雷达、导航设备以及各种武器装备等等，但不包括发动机。
Not exactly. 70% of the products are indigenous including Sonar, Radar, Navigation and weapons, but not the engines
不完全是。其中70%的零部件都是国产的，包括声纳、雷达、导航设备以及各种武器装备等等，但不包括发动机。
@jkc3738
It should be 70% of the weight.. Indeed, the hull is made in India
应该是重量的70%，实际上，船体是印度制造的。
It should be 70% of the weight.. Indeed, the hull is made in India
应该是重量的70%，实际上，船体是印度制造的。
很赞 11
收藏