来自小鹏的飞行汽车，已获得了3000份订单，外形酷似特斯拉Cybertruck！
正文翻译
XPENG AEROHT founder Zhao Deli announced the product commercialization schedule on the spot, it is said that the flying car will be in November this year in the "China (Zhuhai) Air Show" for the first public manned flight, the fourth quarter of this year to start pre-sale, 2026 to achieve mass production delivery, a single price of no more than 2 million yuan.
小鹏汇天创始人赵德力现场公布了产品商业化时间表，据称，该款飞行汽车将于今年11月在“中国（珠海）航展”首次公开载人飞行，今年四季度启动预售，2026年实现量产交付，单台售价不超过200万元。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The "land aircraft carrier" as a whole adopts a minimalist and fierce cyber mecha design, the vehicle length is about 5.5 meters, the width is about 2 meters, the height is about 2 meters, it can be parked in a standard parking space, it can be driven into the basement, it can be driven by land according to C license, and the user of the flying body needs to hold a C license + flight license. At present, the domestic low-altitude airspace is not fully open, and low-altitude flight needs to go through more complex application procedures, so the application scenario of flying cars is still being explored.
“陆地航母”整体采用极简、凌厉的赛博机甲设计，整车长约5.5米，宽约2米，高约2米，可停入标准停车位，可驶入地库，C照即可陆地驾驶，飞行体用户驾驶需持C照+飞行执照。由于目前国内低空空域尚未完全开放，低空飞行需经过较为复杂的申请手续，因此飞行汽车应用场景仍在探索之中。
XPENG AEROHT is the ecological enterprise of XOPeng Motor and the largest flying car company in Asia. In October 2023, XPENG AEROHT first announced the split flying car "land carrier" under development, and now less than a year later, XPENG AEROHT's first flying car "land carrier" debuted in Guangzhou and conducted public test flights. TA not only looks cool, but also hides full of "black technology" behind it, claiming to be "the only car in the world that can hold a 'plane'"!
小鹏汇天是小鹏汽车的生态企业，也是目前亚洲规模最大的飞行汽车公司。2023年10月，小鹏汇天首次公布了正在研发的分体式飞行汽车“陆地航母”，如今时隔不到一年，小鹏汇天首款飞行汽车“陆地航母”在广州亮相，并进行公开试飞。TA不光外表炫酷，背后还藏了满满的“黑科技”号称是“全球唯一能装下‘飞机’的汽车”！
小鹏汇天是小鹏汽车的生态企业，也是目前亚洲规模最大的飞行汽车公司。2023年10月，小鹏汇天首次公布了正在研发的分体式飞行汽车“陆地航母”，如今时隔不到一年，小鹏汇天首款飞行汽车“陆地航母”在广州亮相，并进行公开试飞。TA不光外表炫酷，背后还藏了满满的“黑科技”号称是“全球唯一能装下‘飞机’的汽车”！
XPENG AEROHT founder Zhao Deli announced the product commercialization schedule on the spot, it is said that the flying car will be in November this year in the "China (Zhuhai) Air Show" for the first public manned flight, the fourth quarter of this year to start pre-sale, 2026 to achieve mass production delivery, a single price of no more than 2 million yuan.
小鹏汇天创始人赵德力现场公布了产品商业化时间表，据称，该款飞行汽车将于今年11月在“中国（珠海）航展”首次公开载人飞行，今年四季度启动预售，2026年实现量产交付，单台售价不超过200万元。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The "land aircraft carrier" as a whole adopts a minimalist and fierce cyber mecha design, the vehicle length is about 5.5 meters, the width is about 2 meters, the height is about 2 meters, it can be parked in a standard parking space, it can be driven into the basement, it can be driven by land according to C license, and the user of the flying body needs to hold a C license + flight license. At present, the domestic low-altitude airspace is not fully open, and low-altitude flight needs to go through more complex application procedures, so the application scenario of flying cars is still being explored.
“陆地航母”整体采用极简、凌厉的赛博机甲设计，整车长约5.5米，宽约2米，高约2米，可停入标准停车位，可驶入地库，C照即可陆地驾驶，飞行体用户驾驶需持C照+飞行执照。由于目前国内低空空域尚未完全开放，低空飞行需经过较为复杂的申请手续，因此飞行汽车应用场景仍在探索之中。
Zhao Deli said that the company is accelerating the construction of application scenarios, and plans to cooperate with the flight camp, with the help of the flight camp's own airspace resources, so that users can fly in a specific area without having to apply separately. Up to now, XPENG AEROHT has completed the cooperation signing of more than 70 flight camps, and plans to complete the layout of more than 200 flight camps by the end of the year. At the same time, in addition to providing personal travel, XPENG AEROHT is also expanding the application scenarios of flying cars for public services, including emergency medical rescue, short-distance obstacle rescue, high-speed accident rescue, high-rise escape pods, etc.
赵德力表示，公司正加快推动应用场景建设，计划与飞行营地合作，借助飞行营地自带的空域资源，让用户在特定区域内飞行无需再单独申请。截至目前小鹏汇天已完成超70个飞行营地的合作签约，计划到年底前完成超200个飞行营地的布局。与此同时，在提供个人出行之外，小鹏汇天也在同步拓展飞行汽车面向公共服务领域的应用场景，包括紧急医疗救援、短途越障救援、高速事故救援、高楼逃生舱等。
赵德力表示，公司正加快推动应用场景建设，计划与飞行营地合作，借助飞行营地自带的空域资源，让用户在特定区域内飞行无需再单独申请。截至目前小鹏汇天已完成超70个飞行营地的合作签约，计划到年底前完成超200个飞行营地的布局。与此同时，在提供个人出行之外，小鹏汇天也在同步拓展飞行汽车面向公共服务领域的应用场景，包括紧急医疗救援、短途越障救援、高速事故救援、高楼逃生舱等。
Zhao Deli said that based on the exploration of application scenarios, XPENG AEROHT will implement the "three-step" product strategy, the first step is to launch the split flying car "land carrier", which is mainly used in the flight experience and public service field of limited scenes; The second step is to launch high-speed and long-range eVTOL products to solve air traffic problems in typical scenarios. The third step is to launch a land and air integrated flying car to achieve door-to-door, point-to-point urban 3D transportation.
赵德力称，基于应用场景的探索，小鹏汇天将推行“三步走”产品战略，第一步，推出分体式飞行汽车“陆地航母”，主要应用于限定场景的飞行体验和公共服务领域；第二步，推出高速长航程的eVTOL产品，解决典型场景下的空中交通问题；第三步，推出陆空一体式飞行汽车，实现门到门、点到点的城市3D立体交通。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
赵德力称，基于应用场景的探索，小鹏汇天将推行“三步走”产品战略，第一步，推出分体式飞行汽车“陆地航母”，主要应用于限定场景的飞行体验和公共服务领域；第二步，推出高速长航程的eVTOL产品，解决典型场景下的空中交通问题；第三步，推出陆空一体式飞行汽车，实现门到门、点到点的城市3D立体交通。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
评论翻译
@nerdbikes3841
Looks like a 70’s Saturday morning cartoon fever dream
看起来像70年代周六早晨的卡通发烧梦
Looks like a 70’s Saturday morning cartoon fever dream
看起来像70年代周六早晨的卡通发烧梦
@5wys17-cv7dz
China has become center of innovation. They innovate and sell their products at affordable price.
中国已经成为创新的中心。他们创新并以实惠的价格销售产品。
China has become center of innovation. They innovate and sell their products at affordable price.
中国已经成为创新的中心。他们创新并以实惠的价格销售产品。
@goldfools5445
The future is here..
未来已经到来..
The future is here..
未来已经到来..
@smashsmash5866
Looks way way better than Cybertruck.
看起来比Cybertruck好得多。
Looks way way better than Cybertruck.
看起来比Cybertruck好得多。
@eclecticcyclist
The initial purchasers are likely to be commercial operators eg helicopter hire companies and some companies who need a helicopter regularly for their operations e.g. inspecting grid cables.
初始购买者可能是商业运营者，例如直升机租赁公司和一些需要定期使用直升机进行操作的公司，例如检查电网电缆。
The initial purchasers are likely to be commercial operators eg helicopter hire companies and some companies who need a helicopter regularly for their operations e.g. inspecting grid cables.
初始购买者可能是商业运营者，例如直升机租赁公司和一些需要定期使用直升机进行操作的公司，例如检查电网电缆。
@Y2Kvids
@eclecticcyclist or Taylor swift
或者泰勒·斯威夫特
@eclecticcyclist or Taylor swift
或者泰勒·斯威夫特
@copaloadofthis
Xpeng have got their 'hand on it' with this one...
小鹏已经掌握了这个...
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Xpeng have got their 'hand on it' with this one...
小鹏已经掌握了这个...
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@trevorsoh2130
This design is pretty nice! I didn’t think I’d be saying this but like the design of the car part more than the Cybertruck. Glad they took inspiration from the Cybertruck - shows the promise of that design language.
这个设计相当不错！我没想到我会这么说，但我更喜欢这款车的设计，而不是Cybertruck。很高兴他们从Cybertruck中获得了灵感——这显示了这种设计语言的潜力。
This design is pretty nice! I didn’t think I’d be saying this but like the design of the car part more than the Cybertruck. Glad they took inspiration from the Cybertruck - shows the promise of that design language.
这个设计相当不错！我没想到我会这么说，但我更喜欢这款车的设计，而不是Cybertruck。很高兴他们从Cybertruck中获得了灵感——这显示了这种设计语言的潜力。
@zubinix
At first I thought it was a fake. Someone trolling us but I actually really like the concept. Wonder what another 10 years of battery and autonomous technology development will do to this concept?
起初我以为这是假的。有人在戏弄我们，但我真的很喜欢这个概念。想知道电池和自动驾驶技术再发展十年会给这个概念带来什么？
At first I thought it was a fake. Someone trolling us but I actually really like the concept. Wonder what another 10 years of battery and autonomous technology development will do to this concept?
起初我以为这是假的。有人在戏弄我们，但我真的很喜欢这个概念。想知道电池和自动驾驶技术再发展十年会给这个概念带来什么？
@nicholasglade4572
I can't buy an Xpeng car in the states because we have 199% tariffs. So instead of being forced to buy an inferior car here in the states I bought xpeng's stock.
我不能在美国买小鹏车，因为我们有199%的关税。所以我没有被迫在美国买劣质车，而是买了小鹏的股票。
I can't buy an Xpeng car in the states because we have 199% tariffs. So instead of being forced to buy an inferior car here in the states I bought xpeng's stock.
我不能在美国买小鹏车，因为我们有199%的关税。所以我没有被迫在美国买劣质车，而是买了小鹏的股票。
@junizhao
Without the drone loaded at the back, this vehicle can be made into a pickup truck that looks much better and cooler than the Cybertruck!
如果没有装载后方的无人机，这辆车可以改造成一辆比Cybertruck更好更酷的皮卡车！
Without the drone loaded at the back, this vehicle can be made into a pickup truck that looks much better and cooler than the Cybertruck!
如果没有装载后方的无人机，这辆车可以改造成一辆比Cybertruck更好更酷的皮卡车！
@erhuforever
This will be very good for Search & Rescue missions.
这将非常适合搜救任务。
This will be very good for Search & Rescue missions.
这将非常适合搜救任务。
@MrGMawson2438
The future is coming along fast
未来正在迅速到来
The future is coming along fast
未来正在迅速到来
@Aggie4life77
They can keep that! When you’re talking about flying craft, it needs to be a well maintained craft. With that said, this is for the rich or commercial use ONLY!
他们可以保留这个！当你谈论飞行器时，它必须是维护良好的飞行器。话虽如此，这只适合富人或商业用途！
They can keep that! When you’re talking about flying craft, it needs to be a well maintained craft. With that said, this is for the rich or commercial use ONLY!
他们可以保留这个！当你谈论飞行器时，它必须是维护良好的飞行器。话虽如此，这只适合富人或商业用途！
@duanebonney
FSD in the air is the future. Like Back To Future 2. Just give it 10 more years maybe.
空中的全自动驾驶是未来。就像《回到未来2》一样。也许再给它10年。
FSD in the air is the future. Like Back To Future 2. Just give it 10 more years maybe.
空中的全自动驾驶是未来。就像《回到未来2》一样。也许再给它10年。
@sun-man
Imagine every tattooed yobbo with one of these in their backyards. The horror!
想象一下每个纹身的混混在他们的后院里都有一个这样的东西。太恐怖了！
Imagine every tattooed yobbo with one of these in their backyards. The horror!
想象一下每个纹身的混混在他们的后院里都有一个这样的东西。太恐怖了！
@theknave4415
There are quite a few companies working on flying cars and flying motorcycles.
有不少公司在研究飞行汽车和飞行摩托车。
There are quite a few companies working on flying cars and flying motorcycles.
有不少公司在研究飞行汽车和飞行摩托车。
@SkitterB.Unibrow
No Pilots licensee required for 'Jetson' drone aircraft in US, so I'm assuming same for the Xpeng.
在美国“杰特森”无人机不需要飞行员执照，所以我猜小鹏也一样。
No Pilots licensee required for 'Jetson' drone aircraft in US, so I'm assuming same for the Xpeng.
在美国“杰特森”无人机不需要飞行员执照，所以我猜小鹏也一样。
@bret354
I think it could, but you would have to build a city with that in mind as chargers would have to be on the roof of buildings or the top floor of parking garages.
我认为这是可行的，但你必须考虑到这一点来建造城市，因为充电器必须安装在建筑物的屋顶或停车场的顶层。
I think it could, but you would have to build a city with that in mind as chargers would have to be on the roof of buildings or the top floor of parking garages.
我认为这是可行的，但你必须考虑到这一点来建造城市，因为充电器必须安装在建筑物的屋顶或停车场的顶层。
@Leafbinder
I was interested in Blackfly when it was shown a few years back but the problem with these vehicles is they always run out of money so who knows maybe this will be the one to break the mold.
几年前展示Blackfly时我很感兴趣，但这些车辆的问题在于它们总是资金不足，所以谁知道，也许这次会是个例外。
I was interested in Blackfly when it was shown a few years back but the problem with these vehicles is they always run out of money so who knows maybe this will be the one to break the mold.
几年前展示Blackfly时我很感兴趣，但这些车辆的问题在于它们总是资金不足，所以谁知道，也许这次会是个例外。
@autosextricos-americalat9276
This XPeng car is destined to be a commercial success. Simply because highways already have too much traffic. Because of induced demand, if you double the highway lanes, it means that in 3 to 5 years, people will purchase three times more cars. In the end, it's practically impossible to reduce traffic congestion and there's no where to park.
这辆小鹏车注定会取得商业成功。因为高速公路上已经有太多交通。由于诱导需求，如果你增加两倍的车道，这意味着在3到5年内，人们会购买三倍的汽车。最终，几乎不可能减少交通拥堵，而且没有地方停车。
This XPeng car is destined to be a commercial success. Simply because highways already have too much traffic. Because of induced demand, if you double the highway lanes, it means that in 3 to 5 years, people will purchase three times more cars. In the end, it's practically impossible to reduce traffic congestion and there's no where to park.
这辆小鹏车注定会取得商业成功。因为高速公路上已经有太多交通。由于诱导需求，如果你增加两倍的车道，这意味着在3到5年内，人们会购买三倍的汽车。最终，几乎不可能减少交通拥堵，而且没有地方停车。
@michaelrutledge5991
The cavernous van/truck would be a useful vehicle if AWD with that kind of range
如果有四轮驱动和那样的续航，这种宽敞的面包车/卡车将是非常有用的车辆。
The cavernous van/truck would be a useful vehicle if AWD with that kind of range
如果有四轮驱动和那样的续航，这种宽敞的面包车/卡车将是非常有用的车辆。
@restonthewind
It's more of a van with a quadcopter in the back. There are plenty of transforming flying car concepts. Aeromobil is more of a flying car, but it doesn't take off and land vertically. You must driving to an airstrip to take off. Prototypes have been produced. The Terrafugia Transition is similar and received a lot of attention a few years ago. The PAL-V transitions into a gyroplane, so it doesn't take off vertically, but it requires a very short runway. It was supposed to be produced, beyond prototypes, this year. Don't know if it will be.
这更像是一辆后部带有四轴飞行器的面包车。有很多变形飞行汽车的概念。Aeromobil更像是一辆飞行汽车，但它不能垂直起降。你必须开到跑道上才能起飞。原型机已经生产出来。Terrafugia Transition类似，几年前得到了很多关注。PAL-V变形为旋翼飞机，不能垂直起飞，但只需要非常短的跑道。原计划今年超越原型机进行量产。不知道是否会实现。
It's more of a van with a quadcopter in the back. There are plenty of transforming flying car concepts. Aeromobil is more of a flying car, but it doesn't take off and land vertically. You must driving to an airstrip to take off. Prototypes have been produced. The Terrafugia Transition is similar and received a lot of attention a few years ago. The PAL-V transitions into a gyroplane, so it doesn't take off vertically, but it requires a very short runway. It was supposed to be produced, beyond prototypes, this year. Don't know if it will be.
这更像是一辆后部带有四轴飞行器的面包车。有很多变形飞行汽车的概念。Aeromobil更像是一辆飞行汽车，但它不能垂直起降。你必须开到跑道上才能起飞。原型机已经生产出来。Terrafugia Transition类似，几年前得到了很多关注。PAL-V变形为旋翼飞机，不能垂直起飞，但只需要非常短的跑道。原计划今年超越原型机进行量产。不知道是否会实现。
Flying cars are definitely closer to reality than humanoid bots, and I'd rather have one, but I'm not expecting either anytime soon.
If three hundred grand seems incredibly cheap to you, your channel is doing very well.
If you want it to seem more realistic in only a few years, get Elon to pitch it.
飞行汽车离现实比类人机器人更近，我更愿意拥有一辆，但我不指望它们很快实现。
如果三十万美元对你来说显得非常便宜，那么你的频道做得非常好。
如果你想让它在几年内看起来更现实，就让埃隆来推销它。
If three hundred grand seems incredibly cheap to you, your channel is doing very well.
If you want it to seem more realistic in only a few years, get Elon to pitch it.
飞行汽车离现实比类人机器人更近，我更愿意拥有一辆，但我不指望它们很快实现。
如果三十万美元对你来说显得非常便宜，那么你的频道做得非常好。
如果你想让它在几年内看起来更现实，就让埃隆来推销它。
@mwalker52
Yes, I think EVTOLs are coming sooner than people realize. The technology convergence is happening to enable them: High speed internet everywhere, Battery tech, Autonomous AI.
是的，我认为电动垂直起降飞机比人们意识到的更快到来。技术的融合正在发生，高速互联网无处不在，电池技术，自主AI。
Yes, I think EVTOLs are coming sooner than people realize. The technology convergence is happening to enable them: High speed internet everywhere, Battery tech, Autonomous AI.
是的，我认为电动垂直起降飞机比人们意识到的更快到来。技术的融合正在发生，高速互联网无处不在，电池技术，自主AI。
@mistermcluvin2425
Cool but i can only imagine the liability and insurance. This thing breaks down, fails and the occupants are goners....along with people below them. Maybe you live on a farm and can build a landing pad but what about your destination? Over here land is at a premium in town and even car stalls are undersized. Nobody is going to set aside the space to clear those rotors. That would make for massive parking spaces. I love blade runner as much as the next guy but I cant see flying cars occuring anytime soon.
很酷，但我比较关心它的责任和保险。这东西一旦故障，乘客就完了……以及他们下面的人。也许你住在农场，可以建一个着陆坪，但你的目的地呢？在这里，市区的土地非常稀缺，连停车位都很小。没有人会腾出空间给这些旋翼让路。这会造成巨大的停车空间。我和其他人一样喜欢《银翼杀手》，但我看不出飞行汽车会在短期内出现。
Cool but i can only imagine the liability and insurance. This thing breaks down, fails and the occupants are goners....along with people below them. Maybe you live on a farm and can build a landing pad but what about your destination? Over here land is at a premium in town and even car stalls are undersized. Nobody is going to set aside the space to clear those rotors. That would make for massive parking spaces. I love blade runner as much as the next guy but I cant see flying cars occuring anytime soon.
很酷，但我比较关心它的责任和保险。这东西一旦故障，乘客就完了……以及他们下面的人。也许你住在农场，可以建一个着陆坪，但你的目的地呢？在这里，市区的土地非常稀缺，连停车位都很小。没有人会腾出空间给这些旋翼让路。这会造成巨大的停车空间。我和其他人一样喜欢《银翼杀手》，但我看不出飞行汽车会在短期内出现。
@junizhao
Modern electric motors are extremely reliable, almost fail proof! And there are 6 of them, even 2-3 motors fail at the same time it’s still able to land safely.
现代电动机非常可靠，几乎不会失效！而且有6个电动机，即使同时失效2-3个，它仍然可以安全着陆。
Modern electric motors are extremely reliable, almost fail proof! And there are 6 of them, even 2-3 motors fail at the same time it’s still able to land safely.
现代电动机非常可靠，几乎不会失效！而且有6个电动机，即使同时失效2-3个，它仍然可以安全着陆。
@spljapan
I would live in Shenzhen, get this monster and then fly to Kunming over the weekends.
我要住在深圳，买下这个怪物，然后周末飞去昆明。
I would live in Shenzhen, get this monster and then fly to Kunming over the weekends.
我要住在深圳，买下这个怪物，然后周末飞去昆明。
@leontx4211
In China, 'XPeng' prounced 'xiao peng', (yes, same Chinese charactor as 'xiao' in 'xiaomi'), after the name of the founder 'He xiao-Peng', who is also from same province as Lei Jun, founder of xiaomi. Lei also helped him at the very critical starting stage of XPeng.
在中国，“小鹏”发音为“xiao peng”，（是的，和“小米”中的“小”是同一个汉字），取自创始人“何小鹏”的名字。他和小米创始人雷军来自同一个省。雷军也在小鹏初期的关键阶段帮助了他。
In China, 'XPeng' prounced 'xiao peng', (yes, same Chinese charactor as 'xiao' in 'xiaomi'), after the name of the founder 'He xiao-Peng', who is also from same province as Lei Jun, founder of xiaomi. Lei also helped him at the very critical starting stage of XPeng.
在中国，“小鹏”发音为“xiao peng”，（是的，和“小米”中的“小”是同一个汉字），取自创始人“何小鹏”的名字。他和小米创始人雷军来自同一个省。雷军也在小鹏初期的关键阶段帮助了他。
@BeerStein
If it's self driving you might not need a pilot's license, if they are legal at all. Also, note that there are already other electric planes now being used for pilot training in a couple of European countries, and being an EV makes it much cheaper to get in the flying hours needed for a license.
如果它是自动驾驶的，你可能不需要飞行员执照，如果它们是合法的话。此外，请注意，目前已有其他电动飞机在几个欧洲国家用于飞行员培训，作为电动飞机，获取执照所需的飞行时间要便宜得多。
If it's self driving you might not need a pilot's license, if they are legal at all. Also, note that there are already other electric planes now being used for pilot training in a couple of European countries, and being an EV makes it much cheaper to get in the flying hours needed for a license.
如果它是自动驾驶的，你可能不需要飞行员执照，如果它们是合法的话。此外，请注意，目前已有其他电动飞机在几个欧洲国家用于飞行员培训，作为电动飞机，获取执照所需的飞行时间要便宜得多。
@bermudatriangle2036
yes its the future
是的，这是未来
yes its the future
是的，这是未来
@ep8029
I wonder what would happen if even only one of the motors packed in?
It looks like you'd head south pretty quickly if it did.
我想知道如果其中一个电动机故障会发生什么？
看起来你会迅速往下掉。
I wonder what would happen if even only one of the motors packed in?
It looks like you'd head south pretty quickly if it did.
我想知道如果其中一个电动机故障会发生什么？
看起来你会迅速往下掉。
@ctuna2011
Those Evtols would be mostly computer controlled without a wind or wing mode. Does it do the transformer thing ?
这些电动垂直起降飞机大多是由计算机控制的，没有风力或翼模式。它能变形吗？
Those Evtols would be mostly computer controlled without a wind or wing mode. Does it do the transformer thing ?
这些电动垂直起降飞机大多是由计算机控制的，没有风力或翼模式。它能变形吗？
@jimmychoi5219
Looks better then a Cybertruck
看起来比Cybertruck好
Looks better then a Cybertruck
看起来比Cybertruck好
@FLPhotoCatcher
It looks like a cobbled-together copy with add-ons of the Cybertruck. I like the look of the Cybertruck better, because it's at truck, not some combo of SUV and truck and drone delivery thing.
看起来像是Cybertruck的拼凑版加了一些配件。我更喜欢Cybertruck的外观，因为它是一辆卡车，而不是某种SUV和卡车及无人机的组合体。
It looks like a cobbled-together copy with add-ons of the Cybertruck. I like the look of the Cybertruck better, because it's at truck, not some combo of SUV and truck and drone delivery thing.
看起来像是Cybertruck的拼凑版加了一些配件。我更喜欢Cybertruck的外观，因为它是一辆卡车，而不是某种SUV和卡车及无人机的组合体。
@paulbennett4548
I can see one important use for it; "Honey have you seen Mother?" "I've sent her on ahead in the Copter".......................
我能看到一个重要的用途：“亲爱的，你看到妈妈了吗？”“我已经把她送上直升机了”......
I can see one important use for it; "Honey have you seen Mother?" "I've sent her on ahead in the Copter".......................
我能看到一个重要的用途：“亲爱的，你看到妈妈了吗？”“我已经把她送上直升机了”......
@brianschmidt8392
30 hours training for a sport license and you are flying.
30小时的培训就能拿到运动执照并飞行。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
30 hours training for a sport license and you are flying.
30小时的培训就能拿到运动执照并飞行。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@SydneyEV
I just want the van, you can keep the multirotor.
我只要面包车，你可以保留多轴飞行器。
I just want the van, you can keep the multirotor.
我只要面包车，你可以保留多轴飞行器。
@user-cz2pw4zv4e
So would the "aircraft carrier's" oversize battery be used to charge the flying craft?
那么，“航母”的超大电池会用来给飞行器充电吗？
So would the "aircraft carrier's" oversize battery be used to charge the flying craft?
那么，“航母”的超大电池会用来给飞行器充电吗？
@apterachallenge
There's no way this thing will be allowed to take off from public streets. There's overhead power lines, cellular towers, other aircraft, all kinds of stuff that it could collide with. The only way anything like this will ever be available to the public is if it's 100% automated and flies only in designated areas and at certain altitudes. They are not going to let the masses fly around in these. Imagine the mayhem if you take off and didn't realize your neighbour just took off at the same time and was flying in your direction. You'd need eyes in the back of your head.
这种东西绝对不可能从公共街道上起飞。上方有电线、蜂窝塔、其他飞行器，各种可能撞到的东西。这种东西唯一可能公之于众的方式是100%自动化，并且只能在指定区域和特定高度飞行。他们不会让大众随意驾驶这些东西。想象一下如果你起飞时没注意到你的邻居也在同一时间起飞并朝你的方向飞来，会有多混乱。你得长出后脑勺的眼睛。
There's no way this thing will be allowed to take off from public streets. There's overhead power lines, cellular towers, other aircraft, all kinds of stuff that it could collide with. The only way anything like this will ever be available to the public is if it's 100% automated and flies only in designated areas and at certain altitudes. They are not going to let the masses fly around in these. Imagine the mayhem if you take off and didn't realize your neighbour just took off at the same time and was flying in your direction. You'd need eyes in the back of your head.
这种东西绝对不可能从公共街道上起飞。上方有电线、蜂窝塔、其他飞行器，各种可能撞到的东西。这种东西唯一可能公之于众的方式是100%自动化，并且只能在指定区域和特定高度飞行。他们不会让大众随意驾驶这些东西。想象一下如果你起飞时没注意到你的邻居也在同一时间起飞并朝你的方向飞来，会有多混乱。你得长出后脑勺的眼睛。
@Guitar6ty
The vehicle looks way better than the cyber junk could be used by emergency services. Flying cars will come in about 50 years.
这辆车看起来比那些网络垃圾好得多，能被应急服务使用。飞行汽车将在大约50年后到来。
The vehicle looks way better than the cyber junk could be used by emergency services. Flying cars will come in about 50 years.
这辆车看起来比那些网络垃圾好得多，能被应急服务使用。飞行汽车将在大约50年后到来。
@masonkanterbury3007
So when you're stuck in traffic and need to bail, you pull over and get in the whirly bird, come back when the traffic is over. Pretty nice.
所以当你被困在交通中需要脱身时，你可以靠边停车，然后进入旋翼机，等交通结束后再回来。挺不错的。
So when you're stuck in traffic and need to bail, you pull over and get in the whirly bird, come back when the traffic is over. Pretty nice.
所以当你被困在交通中需要脱身时，你可以靠边停车，然后进入旋翼机，等交通结束后再回来。挺不错的。
@HanDuoS
...you don't come back...the car drives itself to you.
你不用回来……车会自动开到你那里。
...you don't come back...the car drives itself to you.
你不用回来……车会自动开到你那里。
@carlfrancis8565
Why wait till you get stuck in traffic??
为什么要等到你被困在交通中？
Why wait till you get stuck in traffic??
为什么要等到你被困在交通中？
@malcolmrickarby2313
With AI looking after air traffic control this will be safer, quicker and quieter than existing road cars. It could free the roads for walking and cycling.
有AI负责空中交通管制，这将比现有的公路车辆更安全、更快、更安静。这可以为步行和骑行腾出道路。
With AI looking after air traffic control this will be safer, quicker and quieter than existing road cars. It could free the roads for walking and cycling.
有AI负责空中交通管制，这将比现有的公路车辆更安全、更快、更安静。这可以为步行和骑行腾出道路。
@carlfrancis8565
Yes & China will lead the way with autonomous flight. Haven't you heard of Ehang?
是的，中国将引领自动驾驶飞行的潮流。你没听说过亿航吗？
Yes & China will lead the way with autonomous flight. Haven't you heard of Ehang?
是的，中国将引领自动驾驶飞行的潮流。你没听说过亿航吗？
@EnriqueAThieleSolivan
The idea has been on and off for decades. Technology has advanced a lot. Maybe it is time for it now.
这个想法已经反复了几十年。技术已经进步了很多。也许现在是时候了。
The idea has been on and off for decades. Technology has advanced a lot. Maybe it is time for it now.
这个想法已经反复了几十年。技术已经进步了很多。也许现在是时候了。
@hendrikbarboritsch7003
IMO flying in your private car will stay an exception. Like owning a Ferrari, but more so.
I'd rather some brand develop solar panels that cover your EV and can load 80% during 1 day.
Then we'll have folks scrambling for parking spots in the sun, instead of the shade!
在我看来，开私人飞行车仍将是一个例外。就像拥有法拉利一样，但更夸张。
我宁愿某些品牌开发覆盖电动车的太阳能板，并在一天内充电80%。
到时候我们会看到人们争夺阳光下的停车位，而不是阴凉处！
IMO flying in your private car will stay an exception. Like owning a Ferrari, but more so.
I'd rather some brand develop solar panels that cover your EV and can load 80% during 1 day.
Then we'll have folks scrambling for parking spots in the sun, instead of the shade!
在我看来，开私人飞行车仍将是一个例外。就像拥有法拉利一样，但更夸张。
我宁愿某些品牌开发覆盖电动车的太阳能板，并在一天内充电80%。
到时候我们会看到人们争夺阳光下的停车位，而不是阴凉处！
@mikewallace8087
1:48 a couple eating and drinking wine on a snow covered mountain plateau. The woman is wearing summer clothes. Not Fake.
1:48时，一对夫妇在雪覆盖的山顶高原上吃饭喝酒。那个女人穿着夏季的衣服。不是假的。
1:48 a couple eating and drinking wine on a snow covered mountain plateau. The woman is wearing summer clothes. Not Fake.
1:48时，一对夫妇在雪覆盖的山顶高原上吃饭喝酒。那个女人穿着夏季的衣服。不是假的。
@networm78
Non-CGI version. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YblfnQRsuA . There are lengthier videos on Chinese social media.
非CGI版本。有更长的视频在中国社交媒体上。
Non-CGI version. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YblfnQRsuA . There are lengthier videos on Chinese social media.
非CGI版本。有更长的视频在中国社交媒体上。
@stanspb763
In the spring there are days in the snow covered mountains where tee shirts are fine. Most of sun shine is reflected so it can be very comfortable. I had a home at 6000 feet in the Sierra Nevada Mountains and often had 8 feet of snow well into the start of outdoor BBQ season, entering on the second floor entrance until early June when one could drive to the house. That was T-shirt and shorts weather and all the girls started on their tans wearing bikinis when 4-5 feet of snow was still on the ground. The light reflecting off the snow would accelerate tanning.
在春天，有些时候在雪山上穿T恤就可以。大部分阳光被反射，所以非常舒适。我曾在海拔6000英尺的内华达山脉有一栋房子，通常在户外烧烤季节开始时还会有8英尺的雪，直到6月初才能开车到家里。那是T恤和短裤的天气，所有的女孩在4-5英尺的雪地上穿比基尼开始晒黑。雪地反射的光会加速晒黑。
In the spring there are days in the snow covered mountains where tee shirts are fine. Most of sun shine is reflected so it can be very comfortable. I had a home at 6000 feet in the Sierra Nevada Mountains and often had 8 feet of snow well into the start of outdoor BBQ season, entering on the second floor entrance until early June when one could drive to the house. That was T-shirt and shorts weather and all the girls started on their tans wearing bikinis when 4-5 feet of snow was still on the ground. The light reflecting off the snow would accelerate tanning.
在春天，有些时候在雪山上穿T恤就可以。大部分阳光被反射，所以非常舒适。我曾在海拔6000英尺的内华达山脉有一栋房子，通常在户外烧烤季节开始时还会有8英尺的雪，直到6月初才能开车到家里。那是T恤和短裤的天气，所有的女孩在4-5英尺的雪地上穿比基尼开始晒黑。雪地反射的光会加速晒黑。
@youngkreisler
I saw it at CES. Looks awesome. It would have to be fully automated for mass adoption.
我在CES电子展上看到了它。看起来很棒。要大规模采用，必须实现全自动化。
I saw it at CES. Looks awesome. It would have to be fully automated for mass adoption.
我在CES电子展上看到了它。看起来很棒。要大规模采用，必须实现全自动化。
@bermudatriangle2036
It only takes a year to be a commercial helicopter pilot, 50 flight hours and some tests.
成为商业直升机飞行员只需要一年，50个飞行小时和一些测试。
It only takes a year to be a commercial helicopter pilot, 50 flight hours and some tests.
成为商业直升机飞行员只需要一年，50个飞行小时和一些测试。
@larryc1616
Take my now!
拿走我的钱！（我要买一辆）
Take my now!
拿走我的钱！（我要买一辆）
@cchu319
Likely you won’t be able to fly the drone like heli. It’ll all be autonomous so you won’t need a license.
你可能无法像直升机一样驾驶这架无人机。它将完全自主驾驶，所以你不需要执照。
Likely you won’t be able to fly the drone like heli. It’ll all be autonomous so you won’t need a license.
你可能无法像直升机一样驾驶这架无人机。它将完全自主驾驶，所以你不需要执照。
@John-p7i5g
Can you imagine the road toll once these are all over cities.
你能想象当这些飞行器遍布城市时的路费吗？
Can you imagine the road toll once these are all over cities.
你能想象当这些飞行器遍布城市时的路费吗？
@stanspb763
I doubt they would ever be permitted over cities. These are open country side air vehicles. Losing power over a city in an airplane still can land but those tiny rotors would offer no options of autorotation in full size helicopters. These would just go down.
我怀疑它们是否会被允许在城市上空飞行。这些是乡村地区的空中交通工具。在城市上空失去动力的飞机仍然可以着陆，但那些小型旋翼无法像全尺寸直升机那样自动旋转。这些只会坠落。
I doubt they would ever be permitted over cities. These are open country side air vehicles. Losing power over a city in an airplane still can land but those tiny rotors would offer no options of autorotation in full size helicopters. These would just go down.
我怀疑它们是否会被允许在城市上空飞行。这些是乡村地区的空中交通工具。在城市上空失去动力的飞机仍然可以着陆，但那些小型旋翼无法像全尺寸直升机那样自动旋转。这些只会坠落。
@samwang5831
It should start with point-to-point transport of goods, pilots and humans only after the tech has been proven.
应该先从点对点的货物运输开始，技术成熟后再运送飞行员和人类。
It should start with point-to-point transport of goods, pilots and humans only after the tech has been proven.
应该先从点对点的货物运输开始，技术成熟后再运送飞行员和人类。
@timfehlberg9051
It would be good if they had an option with a bigger battery pack to allow you to recharge the flying car when it's docked.
最好有一个更大的电池组选项，以便在飞行汽车停靠时为其充电。
It would be good if they had an option with a bigger battery pack to allow you to recharge the flying car when it's docked.
最好有一个更大的电池组选项，以便在飞行汽车停靠时为其充电。
@junizhao
@timfehlberg9051 why you thing it doesn’t ?
为什么你觉得它没有？
@timfehlberg9051 why you thing it doesn’t ?
为什么你觉得它没有？
@timfehlberg9051
I don't know if there are multiple battery options or not, it would be good if there was though. If not, it's still good!
我不知道是否有多种电池选项，但如果有的话会很好。即使没有，也还不错！
I don't know if there are multiple battery options or not, it would be good if there was though. If not, it's still good!
我不知道是否有多种电池选项，但如果有的话会很好。即使没有，也还不错！
@KingXerxesTan
I would to get a license to fly this.
我会去考一个飞这个的驾照。
I would to get a license to fly this.
我会去考一个飞这个的驾照。
@paulc6766
I think they may have bought this vehicle from another company. There are YT videos from 2 years ago showing something very like it called the Jetson One.
我认为他们可能是从另一家公司购买了这辆车。两年前的YouTube视频显示有一种非常相似的东西叫做Jetson One。
I think they may have bought this vehicle from another company. There are YT videos from 2 years ago showing something very like it called the Jetson One.
我认为他们可能是从另一家公司购买了这辆车。两年前的YouTube视频显示有一种非常相似的东西叫做Jetson One。
@skylershank9309
I would never purchase a mode of transportation that I would be afraid to get into.
我绝不会购买一种我害怕乘坐的交通工具。
I would never purchase a mode of transportation that I would be afraid to get into.
我绝不会购买一种我害怕乘坐的交通工具。
@nerdbikes3841
Any flying cars would have to be Full Self Driving with no manual override so no pilot license needed.
任何飞行汽车都必须是完全自动驾驶的，没有手动控制，因此不需要飞行执照。
Any flying cars would have to be Full Self Driving with no manual override so no pilot license needed.
任何飞行汽车都必须是完全自动驾驶的，没有手动控制，因此不需要飞行执照。
@Q36BN
Did they just scaled up a hexa-copter and put people in it? BTW Is my drone license enough to fly it? Erm, the only difference is that i won't be flying it remotely with flight controller :D
他们只是把六旋翼无人机放大然后把人放进去吗？顺便问一下，我的无人机驾照够用吗？呃，唯一的区别是我不会用飞行控制器远程操控它 :D
Did they just scaled up a hexa-copter and put people in it? BTW Is my drone license enough to fly it? Erm, the only difference is that i won't be flying it remotely with flight controller :D
他们只是把六旋翼无人机放大然后把人放进去吗？顺便问一下，我的无人机驾照够用吗？呃，唯一的区别是我不会用飞行控制器远程操控它 :D
@MetaView7
You won't need a pilot's license in the future. AI will do everything for you. You can use a joystick to set a destination/direction, and AI will take care of the details for you.
未来你不需要飞行执照。AI会为你处理一切。你可以用操纵杆设定目的地/方向，然后AI会为你处理细节。
You won't need a pilot's license in the future. AI will do everything for you. You can use a joystick to set a destination/direction, and AI will take care of the details for you.
未来你不需要飞行执照。AI会为你处理一切。你可以用操纵杆设定目的地/方向，然后AI会为你处理细节。
@rogerphelps9939
AI had better be told that I don't want some flying machine making a very annoying racket flying over my house and invading my peace and privacy.
最好告诉AI，我不希望有飞行器在我家上空制造噪音，打扰我的宁静和隐私。
AI had better be told that I don't want some flying machine making a very annoying racket flying over my house and invading my peace and privacy.
最好告诉AI，我不希望有飞行器在我家上空制造噪音，打扰我的宁静和隐私。
@stanspb763
The main hurdle is system of air lanes so they are not free to fly anywhere which would be ok only for the first year or two but after 10s of thousands are in the air and probably at modest altitude to save power by not having to climb into open air, about any towers or hills. Climbing to 1 thousand meters would really shorten the range. So staying low, under 100 meters would greatly increase of collisions with towers or tall buildings.
主要的障碍是空中航线系统，因此它们不能随意飞行，这在前一两年可能还可以，但当成千上万的飞行汽车在空中飞行时，可能会为了节省动力而不爬升到开阔的高空，而是在任何塔或小山附近飞行。爬升到1000米高度会大大缩短续航里程。因此，保持低空飞行在100米以下会大大增加与塔或高楼的碰撞风险。
The main hurdle is system of air lanes so they are not free to fly anywhere which would be ok only for the first year or two but after 10s of thousands are in the air and probably at modest altitude to save power by not having to climb into open air, about any towers or hills. Climbing to 1 thousand meters would really shorten the range. So staying low, under 100 meters would greatly increase of collisions with towers or tall buildings.
主要的障碍是空中航线系统，因此它们不能随意飞行，这在前一两年可能还可以，但当成千上万的飞行汽车在空中飞行时，可能会为了节省动力而不爬升到开阔的高空，而是在任何塔或小山附近飞行。爬升到1000米高度会大大缩短续航里程。因此，保持低空飞行在100米以下会大大增加与塔或高楼的碰撞风险。
So a system of sky lanes would be needed between more active routes. That system and pilot training could allow less intensive training as required for a private pilots fixed wing craft ticket. If the guidance system keep the flying car a programmed sky sky lane and prevent free flight over say, 300 meters above ground level and out of airport approaches, The tech is hear now to do all that. Can it fly with 2 oe 3 rotors operating? If they all have independent controllers it should be pretty east to decend safely wiith one oe 2 failed rotors.
所以在较活跃的航线上需要一个空中车道系统。这个系统和飞行员训练可以让培训强度低于私人飞行员驾驶固定翼飞机所需的训练强度。如果导航系统将飞行汽车保持在预定的空中车道上，并防止在地面300米以上和机场进近区之外的自由飞行，现在的技术已经可以做到这些。它能在两个或三个旋翼运行的情况下飞行吗？如果它们都有独立的控制器，即使有一两个旋翼失效也应该能很容易安全降落。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
所以在较活跃的航线上需要一个空中车道系统。这个系统和飞行员训练可以让培训强度低于私人飞行员驾驶固定翼飞机所需的训练强度。如果导航系统将飞行汽车保持在预定的空中车道上，并防止在地面300米以上和机场进近区之外的自由飞行，现在的技术已经可以做到这些。它能在两个或三个旋翼运行的情况下飞行吗？如果它们都有独立的控制器，即使有一两个旋翼失效也应该能很容易安全降落。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
When I took my basic pilots training in my Piper Arrow I had to take greater number of hours flying because it was classed as a Complex High Performance because it had retractable landing rear and Constant Speed prop. That had one 350horse power engine so lots of practice descending and landing without power. But a plane has wing lift passively. So One can lose power and stay in the air a long relatively long time to get to an airport or low traffic secondary road if is had no trees or power lines near the roadbed. A helicopter's wings are the blades of the pros and tiny blades would not provide much lift if one lost power. so seperate power supplies would be needed for each motor.
All could be done but remember planes are powered gliders and helicopters are powered bricks. Tiny rotors would offer no option for autorotation like a real helicopter has but each with some left, it is still going down
当我在Piper Arrow上接受基础飞行训练时，我必须增加飞行小时数，因为它被归类为复杂高性能飞机，因为它有可收放起落架和定速螺旋桨。那是一台350马力的发动机，所以我有很多在没有动力的情况下下降和着陆的练习。但是飞机有被动升力的机翼。所以即使失去动力，也能在空中停留相对较长的时间到达机场或低交通次级道路，如果路边没有树或电线的话。直升机的翼是螺旋桨的叶片，如果失去动力，微小的叶片不会提供太多的升力，所以每个电机需要独立的电源供应。所有这些都可以做到，但请记住，飞机是动力滑翔机，直升机是动力砖块。微小的旋翼不会提供像真正的直升机那样的自转选项，但即使有一些升力，它还是会向下掉落。
All could be done but remember planes are powered gliders and helicopters are powered bricks. Tiny rotors would offer no option for autorotation like a real helicopter has but each with some left, it is still going down
当我在Piper Arrow上接受基础飞行训练时，我必须增加飞行小时数，因为它被归类为复杂高性能飞机，因为它有可收放起落架和定速螺旋桨。那是一台350马力的发动机，所以我有很多在没有动力的情况下下降和着陆的练习。但是飞机有被动升力的机翼。所以即使失去动力，也能在空中停留相对较长的时间到达机场或低交通次级道路，如果路边没有树或电线的话。直升机的翼是螺旋桨的叶片，如果失去动力，微小的叶片不会提供太多的升力，所以每个电机需要独立的电源供应。所有这些都可以做到，但请记住，飞机是动力滑翔机，直升机是动力砖块。微小的旋翼不会提供像真正的直升机那样的自转选项，但即使有一些升力，它还是会向下掉落。
@rogerphelps9939
Noise nuisance will kill it if nothing else does.
如果没有其他问题的话，噪音困扰会让它失败。
Noise nuisance will kill it if nothing else does.
如果没有其他问题的话，噪音困扰会让它失败。
@luizacl4507
I think is is highly unlikely this will be a mainstream thing in the near future. Maybe 30 years from now. Flying is pretty inefficient and people tend to adapt slowly. I think evtol taxis are realistic though (just as helicopters are, but evtols will be more popular) and there are some companies working with that in mind.
我认为这在不久的将来成为主流的可能性很小。也许30年后。飞行效率相当低，人们适应得也很慢。不过我认为电动垂直起降出租车是现实的（就像直升机一样，但电动垂直起降将更受欢迎），并且有些公司正在以此为目标进行研发。
I think is is highly unlikely this will be a mainstream thing in the near future. Maybe 30 years from now. Flying is pretty inefficient and people tend to adapt slowly. I think evtol taxis are realistic though (just as helicopters are, but evtols will be more popular) and there are some companies working with that in mind.
我认为这在不久的将来成为主流的可能性很小。也许30年后。飞行效率相当低，人们适应得也很慢。不过我认为电动垂直起降出租车是现实的（就像直升机一样，但电动垂直起降将更受欢迎），并且有些公司正在以此为目标进行研发。
@dbmn7571
If the drone-like flying machine is regulated by the FAA it'll never be used in the USA.
如果这种类似无人机的飞行器受到FAA的监管，它将永远无法在美国使用。
If the drone-like flying machine is regulated by the FAA it'll never be used in the USA.
如果这种类似无人机的飞行器受到FAA的监管，它将永远无法在美国使用。
@rogerphelps9939
Or in pretty much all of the developed world. Far too dangerous. Furthermore the range is going to be pretty low. A conventional aircraft uses far less energy to go the same distance as a comparable helicopter and battery powered fixed wing aircraft are still in their infancy.
或者几乎在所有发达国家都不行。太危险了。此外，它的续航也非常短。传统飞机飞同样的距离所需的能量远少于同类直升机，而且电池驱动的固定翼飞机还处于起步阶段。
Or in pretty much all of the developed world. Far too dangerous. Furthermore the range is going to be pretty low. A conventional aircraft uses far less energy to go the same distance as a comparable helicopter and battery powered fixed wing aircraft are still in their infancy.
或者几乎在所有发达国家都不行。太危险了。此外，它的续航也非常短。传统飞机飞同样的距离所需的能量远少于同类直升机，而且电池驱动的固定翼飞机还处于起步阶段。
@themiddlekingdom9121
Xpeng with flying car is much better than Tesla Cybertruck.
带飞行汽车的小鹏比特斯拉Cybertruck要好得多。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Xpeng with flying car is much better than Tesla Cybertruck.
带飞行汽车的小鹏比特斯拉Cybertruck要好得多。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@styx1272
Rich mans toy , before the accidents.
富人的玩具，在事故发生之前。
Rich mans toy , before the accidents.
富人的玩具，在事故发生之前。
@user-wc8cn7pt6m
Fast and the Furious already giving it a scxt.
《速度与激情》已经在为它写剧本了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Fast and the Furious already giving it a scxt.
《速度与激情》已经在为它写剧本了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@marcv2648
You can fly aircraft like Jetson One in the US without a license because it meets the specifications for an ultralight aircraft.
在美国，你可以驾驶像Jetson One这样的飞行器而不需要执照，因为它符合超轻型飞行器的规格。
You can fly aircraft like Jetson One in the US without a license because it meets the specifications for an ultralight aircraft.
在美国，你可以驾驶像Jetson One这样的飞行器而不需要执照，因为它符合超轻型飞行器的规格。
@mijmijrm
what will traffic control for air vehicles look like? .. what about collisions - loads of debris crashing round the ears of folk below.
空中交通管制会是什么样子？...如果发生碰撞呢？——大量的碎片在下面的人耳边坠落。
what will traffic control for air vehicles look like? .. what about collisions - loads of debris crashing round the ears of folk below.
空中交通管制会是什么样子？...如果发生碰撞呢？——大量的碎片在下面的人耳边坠落。
@justme6275
a real transformer
一个真正的变形金刚
a real transformer
一个真正的变形金刚
@richardshultz6834
The crazy looking truck might make it to market but the drone will not.
这辆看起来疯狂的卡车可能会上市，但无人机不会。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The crazy looking truck might make it to market but the drone will not.
这辆看起来疯狂的卡车可能会上市，但无人机不会。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@errornull77
we have enough bad human drivers. not looking forward to bad flying drivers too. i'd rather wait for all vehicles to be self driving/piloting. vehicle ownership in general is simply overrated. i rather just pay a flat monthly fee for car-as-a-service. i don't have interest or time to deal with car ownership.
我们已经有足够多糟糕的人类驾驶员了，我不期待糟糕的飞行驾驶员。我宁愿等待所有车辆实现自动驾驶/飞行。车辆拥有权总体上被高估了，我宁愿支付一个固定的月费来享受“汽车即服务”。我对车的拥有没有兴趣，也没时间处理这些。
we have enough bad human drivers. not looking forward to bad flying drivers too. i'd rather wait for all vehicles to be self driving/piloting. vehicle ownership in general is simply overrated. i rather just pay a flat monthly fee for car-as-a-service. i don't have interest or time to deal with car ownership.
我们已经有足够多糟糕的人类驾驶员了，我不期待糟糕的飞行驾驶员。我宁愿等待所有车辆实现自动驾驶/飞行。车辆拥有权总体上被高估了，我宁愿支付一个固定的月费来享受“汽车即服务”。我对车的拥有没有兴趣，也没时间处理这些。
@wmcbrine
I actually think it looks more like a Canoo, but I can see the Cybertruck too. Anyway, yeah, not a flying car.
实际上我觉得它更像Canoo，但我也能看到Cybertruck的影子。无论如何，这不是一辆飞行汽车。
I actually think it looks more like a Canoo, but I can see the Cybertruck too. Anyway, yeah, not a flying car.
实际上我觉得它更像Canoo，但我也能看到Cybertruck的影子。无论如何，这不是一辆飞行汽车。
@echomande4395
In my opinion flying cars will not take off before the major issues of traffic control and guidance and routing are solved. Any current air traffic control system would collapse if even a moderate number of flying cars were added to it and I really wouldn't want to trust a random guy or girl off the street in a flying car, even with a pilot's license. Additionally, no current aircraft routing network is currently set up for flying cars (or helicopters) in large numbers.
在我看来，飞行汽车在交通控制、导航和路线问题得到解决之前不会起飞。如果在现有的空中交通控制系统中加入哪怕是少量的飞行汽车，系统都会崩溃，而且我真的不想信任一个普通人驾驶飞行汽车，即使他有飞行执照。此外，目前的飞机航线网络也没有为大量飞行汽车（或直升机）设置。
In my opinion flying cars will not take off before the major issues of traffic control and guidance and routing are solved. Any current air traffic control system would collapse if even a moderate number of flying cars were added to it and I really wouldn't want to trust a random guy or girl off the street in a flying car, even with a pilot's license. Additionally, no current aircraft routing network is currently set up for flying cars (or helicopters) in large numbers.
在我看来，飞行汽车在交通控制、导航和路线问题得到解决之前不会起飞。如果在现有的空中交通控制系统中加入哪怕是少量的飞行汽车，系统都会崩溃，而且我真的不想信任一个普通人驾驶飞行汽车，即使他有飞行执照。此外，目前的飞机航线网络也没有为大量飞行汽车（或直升机）设置。
@rogerphelps9939
Absolutely right.
完全正确。
Absolutely right.
完全正确。
@malcolmrickarby2313
Absolute wrong! Over the last hundred years the aviation industry has developed rapidly and will continue to improve with AI and autonomous flying vehicles completely possible for our immediate future.
完全错误！在过去的一百年里，航空业发展迅速，并将在人工智能和自动飞行器的推动下继续改善，这在不久的将来是完全可能的。
Absolute wrong! Over the last hundred years the aviation industry has developed rapidly and will continue to improve with AI and autonomous flying vehicles completely possible for our immediate future.
完全错误！在过去的一百年里，航空业发展迅速，并将在人工智能和自动飞行器的推动下继续改善，这在不久的将来是完全可能的。
@JimmyDoyel-by2cp
Optimus Prime when?
什么时候会有擎天柱？
Optimus Prime when?
什么时候会有擎天柱？
@johndodge8999
that's not a flying car. Its a van carrying a drone. nothing ground breaking.
那不是飞行汽车。是个载着无人机的面包车。没什么突破性的。
that's not a flying car. Its a van carrying a drone. nothing ground breaking.
那不是飞行汽车。是个载着无人机的面包车。没什么突破性的。
@Hookeslaw
Well it's something interesting and cheap for that price point, even if it's "deep fake". Compared to that Bugatti Bollide strap on extension that a supposed genius is in charge of which retails for 4 million bigguns.
嗯，这个价格算是既有趣又便宜了，即使是“深度造假”。相比那个据称由天才负责的布加迪Bollide加装套件，售价400万美元的大货，这便宜多了。
Well it's something interesting and cheap for that price point, even if it's "deep fake". Compared to that Bugatti Bollide strap on extension that a supposed genius is in charge of which retails for 4 million bigguns.
嗯，这个价格算是既有趣又便宜了，即使是“深度造假”。相比那个据称由天才负责的布加迪Bollide加装套件，售价400万美元的大货，这便宜多了。
@jsanders100
If you think what the roads are like with congestion and noise do we really want to replicate that in the air?
如果你觉得现在道路上的拥堵和噪音已经够糟了，我们真的想在空中复制这些吗？
If you think what the roads are like with congestion and noise do we really want to replicate that in the air?
如果你觉得现在道路上的拥堵和噪音已经够糟了，我们真的想在空中复制这些吗？
@malcolmrickarby2313
There is a lot more space to avoid congestion. Different heights for each direction and speed and no obstacles.
有更多的空间来避免拥堵。每个方向和速度都有不同的高度，而且没有障碍物。
There is a lot more space to avoid congestion. Different heights for each direction and speed and no obstacles.
有更多的空间来避免拥堵。每个方向和速度都有不同的高度，而且没有障碍物。
@JoeyBlogs007
It's known as a flying salami slicer death trap. No control surfaces for a power outage. Use at your own risk.
这被称为飞行的香肠切片机死亡陷阱。断电时没有控制面。使用风险自负。
It's known as a flying salami slicer death trap. No control surfaces for a power outage. Use at your own risk.
这被称为飞行的香肠切片机死亡陷阱。断电时没有控制面。使用风险自负。
@mikewallace8087
If one propeller motor fails, the consequences are?
如果一个螺旋桨电机失效，会有什么后果？
If one propeller motor fails, the consequences are?
如果一个螺旋桨电机失效，会有什么后果？
@Y2Kvids
@mikewallace8087 They can fly on 3, possibly to just land.
它们可以在三个螺旋桨的情况下飞行，可能只能降落。
@mikewallace8087 They can fly on 3, possibly to just land.
它们可以在三个螺旋桨的情况下飞行，可能只能降落。
@mikewallace8087
@Y2Kvids I don't think so. A lift force diagram with the craft C.G. will create a corner drop and prevent a successful landing.
我不这么认为。重心和升力图会导致一角下降，阻止成功着陆。
@Y2Kvids I don't think so. A lift force diagram with the craft C.G. will create a corner drop and prevent a successful landing.
我不这么认为。重心和升力图会导致一角下降，阻止成功着陆。
@Y2Kvids
@mikewallace8087 xpeng has a test video, it has 8 propellers, 2 for each wing, it could handle up to 2 failed propellers. Yes you are right, on one side full propeller failure deploys parachute.
小鹏有一个测试视频，它有8个螺旋桨，每个翼有2个，它可以应对最多两个螺旋桨失效。是的，你说得对，如果一侧全部螺旋桨失效，会部署降落伞。
@mikewallace8087 xpeng has a test video, it has 8 propellers, 2 for each wing, it could handle up to 2 failed propellers. Yes you are right, on one side full propeller failure deploys parachute.
小鹏有一个测试视频，它有8个螺旋桨，每个翼有2个，它可以应对最多两个螺旋桨失效。是的，你说得对，如果一侧全部螺旋桨失效，会部署降落伞。
@ryandietrich8604
Like every helicopter?
像所有直升机一样？
Like every helicopter?
像所有直升机一样？
@snow-uq4gx
Yall can fly illl stay on the ground.
你们可以飞，我还是待在地面上。
Yall can fly illl stay on the ground.
你们可以飞，我还是待在地面上。
@RoverIAC
It reminds me of the Chariot from Lost In Space. All of the flying car footage is CGI.
这让我想起了《迷失太空》里的战车。所有飞行汽车的画面都是CGI。
It reminds me of the Chariot from Lost In Space. All of the flying car footage is CGI.
这让我想起了《迷失太空》里的战车。所有飞行汽车的画面都是CGI。
@paulocarvalho1982
"Flying Car": turns out is simply a "Van" with a helicopter in the trunk... What a joke.
“飞行汽车”：原来只是一个后备箱里放了直升机的面包车……真是个笑话。
"Flying Car": turns out is simply a "Van" with a helicopter in the trunk... What a joke.
“飞行汽车”：原来只是一个后备箱里放了直升机的面包车……真是个笑话。
@durinok
This is kinda cool, but it’s not really a flying car. It’s a combination of an EV drone/helicopter and a separate EV drone carrier, possibly sharing a battery pack? I don’t see much advantage of combining the two technologies, and at a cost of US $280,000, this doesn’t make sense to me. Why not buy the EV of your choice and if you can figure out regulations and licensing, a separate drone/helicopter you launch from your back yard or rooftop. That’s got to be cheaper, faster, longer range, etc. for both vehicles. I grew up reading Popular Mechanics, so I get it, but why?
这东西挺酷的，但并不是真正的飞行汽车。这是一种电动无人机/直升机与一个独立的电动无人机载体的组合，可能共享一个电池包？我看不出这两种技术结合的优势，并且售价28万美元，这对我来说毫无意义。为什么不买一辆你喜欢的电动车，如果你能搞定法规和执照的话，还可以买一架单独的无人机/直升机，从你的后院或屋顶起飞。这两种车辆都会更便宜、更快、更长的续航等等。我是看着《流行机械》长大的，所以我理解，但为什么呢？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
This is kinda cool, but it’s not really a flying car. It’s a combination of an EV drone/helicopter and a separate EV drone carrier, possibly sharing a battery pack? I don’t see much advantage of combining the two technologies, and at a cost of US $280,000, this doesn’t make sense to me. Why not buy the EV of your choice and if you can figure out regulations and licensing, a separate drone/helicopter you launch from your back yard or rooftop. That’s got to be cheaper, faster, longer range, etc. for both vehicles. I grew up reading Popular Mechanics, so I get it, but why?
这东西挺酷的，但并不是真正的飞行汽车。这是一种电动无人机/直升机与一个独立的电动无人机载体的组合，可能共享一个电池包？我看不出这两种技术结合的优势，并且售价28万美元，这对我来说毫无意义。为什么不买一辆你喜欢的电动车，如果你能搞定法规和执照的话，还可以买一架单独的无人机/直升机，从你的后院或屋顶起飞。这两种车辆都会更便宜、更快、更长的续航等等。我是看着《流行机械》长大的，所以我理解，但为什么呢？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@gregwatling4041
I don’t think it’ll be any time soon. People are having a hard enough time accepting electric cars.
我认为这不会很快实现。人们接受电动车都已经够难了。
I don’t think it’ll be any time soon. People are having a hard enough time accepting electric cars.
我认为这不会很快实现。人们接受电动车都已经够难了。
@gacattack1234
Not at all a flying car, a car with a drone. A flying car would be able to drive around at the destination which is the whole reason for it. Don't know what's in the marketers coffee but they should simmer down.
这根本不是飞行汽车，是一辆带无人机的车。飞行汽车应该能够在目的地四处行驶，这才是它的全部意义。我不知道市场人员在咖啡里加了什么，但他们应该冷静一下。
Not at all a flying car, a car with a drone. A flying car would be able to drive around at the destination which is the whole reason for it. Don't know what's in the marketers coffee but they should simmer down.
这根本不是飞行汽车，是一辆带无人机的车。飞行汽车应该能够在目的地四处行驶，这才是它的全部意义。我不知道市场人员在咖啡里加了什么，但他们应该冷静一下。
@WayneBain
Ever notice how many near collisions that occur with regular airplanes under the direction of Air controllers at airports. Stick a few thousand of these in the air and it will not be safe to go outside, the sky may fall on you. People crash everyday in automobiles that operate in one plane. Add the ability to move up and down as well as sideways, front and back. Good grief.
你有没有注意到，在机场空中管制员的指挥下，有多少次普通飞机差点碰撞？把几千个这样的东西放到空中，出门都不安全，天可能会砸到你。人们每天都在单平面操作的汽车中发生碰撞，再加上上下、左右、前后的运动能力，天啊。
Ever notice how many near collisions that occur with regular airplanes under the direction of Air controllers at airports. Stick a few thousand of these in the air and it will not be safe to go outside, the sky may fall on you. People crash everyday in automobiles that operate in one plane. Add the ability to move up and down as well as sideways, front and back. Good grief.
你有没有注意到，在机场空中管制员的指挥下，有多少次普通飞机差点碰撞？把几千个这样的东西放到空中，出门都不安全，天可能会砸到你。人们每天都在单平面操作的汽车中发生碰撞，再加上上下、左右、前后的运动能力，天啊。
@ElMistroFeroz
If that's a "flying car" then Yachts with helipads are flying boats. Come on, people. That thing between your ears is for much more than storing a hat.
如果那是“飞行汽车”，那么有直升机停机坪的游艇就是飞行船了。拜托，各位，脑子不只是用来戴帽子的。
If that's a "flying car" then Yachts with helipads are flying boats. Come on, people. That thing between your ears is for much more than storing a hat.
如果那是“飞行汽车”，那么有直升机停机坪的游艇就是飞行船了。拜托，各位，脑子不只是用来戴帽子的。
@larzlarz1140
Vaporware.
概念产品。
Vaporware.
概念产品。
@user-yh6xf3wl1h
It is not a flying car, it is a quad copter. A flying car can be driven on the road and can also fly, this doesn't even have wheels so how can you call it a car!
这不是飞行汽车，是四旋翼无人机。飞行汽车应该能在路上行驶也能飞，这个连轮子都没有，怎么能叫车呢！
It is not a flying car, it is a quad copter. A flying car can be driven on the road and can also fly, this doesn't even have wheels so how can you call it a car!
这不是飞行汽车，是四旋翼无人机。飞行汽车应该能在路上行驶也能飞，这个连轮子都没有，怎么能叫车呢！
@rogerphelps9939
Flying cars have never succeeded and never will. Traffic on the ground is already bad enough but traffic in the air would be chaos.
飞行汽车从未成功过，以后也不会成功。地面交通已经够糟了，空中交通会更混乱。
Flying cars have never succeeded and never will. Traffic on the ground is already bad enough but traffic in the air would be chaos.
飞行汽车从未成功过，以后也不会成功。地面交通已经够糟了，空中交通会更混乱。
@malcolmrickarby2313
Yeah, it’s not like we have flying buses taking people all around the world with over a million people in the air at any time.
是啊，现在可不像我们有飞行巴士带人们环游世界，每时每刻有超过一百万人在空中飞行。
Yeah, it’s not like we have flying buses taking people all around the world with over a million people in the air at any time.
是啊，现在可不像我们有飞行巴士带人们环游世界，每时每刻有超过一百万人在空中飞行。
@chris27gea58
Will this be a thing? No!
这会成为现实吗？不会！
Will this be a thing? No!
这会成为现实吗？不会！
@eddiegill
Looks more like a helicopter. Reminds me of the Joby vehicle which flies 150 miles at 200 mph.
看起来更像直升机。让我想起Joby的飞行器，可以以每小时200英里的速度飞150英里。
Looks more like a helicopter. Reminds me of the Joby vehicle which flies 150 miles at 200 mph.
看起来更像直升机。让我想起Joby的飞行器，可以以每小时200英里的速度飞150英里。
@FlorestanTrement
Looks terribly unpractical for everyday use. Could be great for some emergency or military applications, though.
日常使用看起来极不实用。不过可能在一些紧急或军事应用中会很好。
Looks terribly unpractical for everyday use. Could be great for some emergency or military applications, though.
日常使用看起来极不实用。不过可能在一些紧急或军事应用中会很好。
@tedoptional-p8l
I predict that most of the 3,000 will be destroyed in two years time from accidents.
我预测这3000辆中的大部分将在两年内因为事故而被毁。
I predict that most of the 3,000 will be destroyed in two years time from accidents.
我预测这3000辆中的大部分将在两年内因为事故而被毁。
@MrGMawson2438
Looks bloody good for the rich.
看起来真是富人的好玩意。
Looks bloody good for the rich.
看起来真是富人的好玩意。
@Davidbirdman101
What could possibly go wrong? I'm sure it's perfectly safe and only "Qualified Pilots" will fly these aerial death machines. Imagine strolling down an average street in Bel air walking your favorite exotic dog breed with a diamond encrusted collar and silk leash when suddenly a 1500 pound carbon fiber lithium powered head chopping whirly bird lands on your head and ruins your vacation plans for a gambling jaunt to Monaco. Tsk,Tsk indeed! Sounds like a great plan!
能出什么问题呢？我确信它是完全安全的，只有“合格的飞行员”才会驾驶这些空中死亡机器。想象一下，你走在贝莱尔的一条普通街道上，牵着你最喜欢的戴着镶钻项圈和丝绸牵绳的稀有犬种，突然一个1500磅的碳纤维锂电动力的砍头旋翼机降落在你头上，毁了你去摩纳哥赌博的度假计划。啧啧，确实如此！听起来像是个好计划！
What could possibly go wrong? I'm sure it's perfectly safe and only "Qualified Pilots" will fly these aerial death machines. Imagine strolling down an average street in Bel air walking your favorite exotic dog breed with a diamond encrusted collar and silk leash when suddenly a 1500 pound carbon fiber lithium powered head chopping whirly bird lands on your head and ruins your vacation plans for a gambling jaunt to Monaco. Tsk,Tsk indeed! Sounds like a great plan!
能出什么问题呢？我确信它是完全安全的，只有“合格的飞行员”才会驾驶这些空中死亡机器。想象一下，你走在贝莱尔的一条普通街道上，牵着你最喜欢的戴着镶钻项圈和丝绸牵绳的稀有犬种，突然一个1500磅的碳纤维锂电动力的砍头旋翼机降落在你头上，毁了你去摩纳哥赌博的度假计划。啧啧，确实如此！听起来像是个好计划！
@malcolmrickarby2313
You should take out insurance against that scenario.
你应该为这种情况买保险。
You should take out insurance against that scenario.
你应该为这种情况买保险。
@LekkerDops
Airspace is controlled, yes in China also. There's your answer, the general public can not fly it. Flying cars whilst technically possible, regulatory restrictions will classify them as a rotor aircraft. = public no fly.
空域是受控制的，是的，在中国也是如此。答案就是普通公众不能飞行。飞行汽车在技术上是可能的，但监管限制会将其归类为旋翼飞机。=公众无法飞行。
Airspace is controlled, yes in China also. There's your answer, the general public can not fly it. Flying cars whilst technically possible, regulatory restrictions will classify them as a rotor aircraft. = public no fly.
空域是受控制的，是的，在中国也是如此。答案就是普通公众不能飞行。飞行汽车在技术上是可能的，但监管限制会将其归类为旋翼飞机。=公众无法飞行。
@malcolmrickarby2313
And rockets will never get to the moon.
火箭永远不会到达月球。
And rockets will never get to the moon.
火箭永远不会到达月球。
@MarkSpohr
Tesla is behind again! Elon needs to keep up.
特斯拉又落后了！埃隆需要跟上。
Tesla is behind again! Elon needs to keep up.
特斯拉又落后了！埃隆需要跟上。
@markplott4820
Xpeng flying COFFIN.
小鹏飞行棺材。
Xpeng flying COFFIN.
小鹏飞行棺材。
@davidbuchan3753
Noise galore. Horrible!
噪音多得很。太可怕了！
Noise galore. Horrible!
噪音多得很。太可怕了！
@BTFD0618
lolll
哈哈哈
lolll
哈哈哈
@malcolmrickarby2313
This is from a major car company that has been developing this through a series of prototypes. At the electric vehicle show in Melbourne they had one on display. I saw it and then I saw the Electric Viking. Both were real.
这是来自一家大型汽车公司，通过一系列原型开发出来的。在墨尔本的电动车展上，他们展示了一辆。我看到了它，也看到了Electric Viking。两者都是真实的。
This is from a major car company that has been developing this through a series of prototypes. At the electric vehicle show in Melbourne they had one on display. I saw it and then I saw the Electric Viking. Both were real.
这是来自一家大型汽车公司，通过一系列原型开发出来的。在墨尔本的电动车展上，他们展示了一辆。我看到了它，也看到了Electric Viking。两者都是真实的。
@runePV
toy for a few rich snobs.. nothing usable.
这是给少数富有的势利眼的玩具……没有什么实用性。
toy for a few rich snobs.. nothing usable.
这是给少数富有的势利眼的玩具……没有什么实用性。
@kevinW826
It’s going to fall apart even before it leaves the assembly line. They won’t keep these on the roads.
它在离开生产线之前就会散架。他们不会让这些上路。
It’s going to fall apart even before it leaves the assembly line. They won’t keep these on the roads.
它在离开生产线之前就会散架。他们不会让这些上路。
@nicholaspostlethwaite9554
It is a toy of the rich. It is stupid! Helicopter licence needed! Complying to air traffic control. Might get away with it in really empty remote places mostly used in the promo.
这是富人的玩具。太蠢了！需要直升机执照！要遵守空中交通管制。也许真的会在空旷偏远的地方使用，主要用于宣传。
It is a toy of the rich. It is stupid! Helicopter licence needed! Complying to air traffic control. Might get away with it in really empty remote places mostly used in the promo.
这是富人的玩具。太蠢了！需要直升机执照！要遵守空中交通管制。也许真的会在空旷偏远的地方使用，主要用于宣传。
@ideasasopiates3129
If it’s Chinese made, of course it’s scary. I can’t trust the quality.
如果是中国制造的，当然很吓人。我不信任质量。
If it’s Chinese made, of course it’s scary. I can’t trust the quality.
如果是中国制造的，当然很吓人。我不信任质量。
@woodswoods7621
They are trying to copy Tesla’s’ a roadster. DUMB.
他们在试图复制特斯拉的跑车。愚蠢。
They are trying to copy Tesla’s’ a roadster. DUMB.
他们在试图复制特斯拉的跑车。愚蠢。
@centralkingdom8141
I'm sure you need a flying licence to buy this thing.
我确定你需要飞行执照才能买这个东西。
I'm sure you need a flying licence to buy this thing.
我确定你需要飞行执照才能买这个东西。
@howardj602
There is already a company in the U.S. that is producing and delivering certified electric Fixed Winged, and VTOLs. BETA corporation located in Burlington Vermont. You might want to do a story on them and see how far behind your Chinese hype is.
美国已经有一家公司在生产和交付认证的电动固定翼和垂直起降飞机。位于佛蒙特州伯灵顿的BETA公司。你可能想做个关于他们的报道，看看你们的中国炒作有多落后。
There is already a company in the U.S. that is producing and delivering certified electric Fixed Winged, and VTOLs. BETA corporation located in Burlington Vermont. You might want to do a story on them and see how far behind your Chinese hype is.
美国已经有一家公司在生产和交付认证的电动固定翼和垂直起降飞机。位于佛蒙特州伯灵顿的BETA公司。你可能想做个关于他们的报道，看看你们的中国炒作有多落后。
很赞 10
收藏