想象一条由无人机组成的巨大中国龙出现在地平线上，成为你在这个世界上看到的最后一幕。我想，这比看到蘑菇云要好一些吧。
正文翻译
j1mmyB3000
That would be most impressive if it were actual speed
如果那真是实际速度的话，那就太令人印象深刻了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
That would be most impressive if it were actual speed
如果那真是实际速度的话，那就太令人印象深刻了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
mademeunlurk
Imagine their military launching this at you
想象一下他们的军队对你发动这样的攻击。
Imagine their military launching this at you
想象一下他们的军队对你发动这样的攻击。
JackSpyder
Take that coordination via software, on high performance FPV drones, which China could make for £10 a pop in the millions, with a hand grenades worth of explosive each.
I know this is a wonderful demonstration of art, and the west did the opposite end, high altitude fingers jet style drones for 20 years costing jet style prices, but these cheap expendables have insane modern application. They decimate any air defence and can be nearly limitless scaled to decimate any defence of any capability.
通过软件协调，利用中国能够以每架10英镑的价格批量生产的数百万架高性能无人机，每架携带相当于一枚手榴弹当量的炸药进行攻击。我知道这是一种绝妙的艺术展示，而西方则走了另一条路，20年来一直致力于开发高空长续航的喷气式无人机，其价格也与喷气式飞机相当。但这些廉价的消耗品在现代战争中有着令人惊叹的应用。它们能摧毁任何防空系统，而且几乎可以无限量地扩大规模，以摧毁任何级别的防御。
Take that coordination via software, on high performance FPV drones, which China could make for £10 a pop in the millions, with a hand grenades worth of explosive each.
I know this is a wonderful demonstration of art, and the west did the opposite end, high altitude fingers jet style drones for 20 years costing jet style prices, but these cheap expendables have insane modern application. They decimate any air defence and can be nearly limitless scaled to decimate any defence of any capability.
通过软件协调，利用中国能够以每架10英镑的价格批量生产的数百万架高性能无人机，每架携带相当于一枚手榴弹当量的炸药进行攻击。我知道这是一种绝妙的艺术展示，而西方则走了另一条路，20年来一直致力于开发高空长续航的喷气式无人机，其价格也与喷气式飞机相当。但这些廉价的消耗品在现代战争中有着令人惊叹的应用。它们能摧毁任何防空系统，而且几乎可以无限量地扩大规模，以摧毁任何级别的防御。
评论翻译
mademeunlurk
The inevitable future of war.
战争不可避免的未来。
The inevitable future of war.
战争不可避免的未来。
JackSpyder
The only defence I'd a bigger cheaper swarm able to intercept. Snd nobody beats China for volume and price and production capacity.
唯一的防御办法是拥有更大规模、更廉价的集群来进行拦截。而在数量、价格和生产能力方面，没人能比得上中国。
The only defence I'd a bigger cheaper swarm able to intercept. Snd nobody beats China for volume and price and production capacity.
唯一的防御办法是拥有更大规模、更廉价的集群来进行拦截。而在数量、价格和生产能力方面，没人能比得上中国。
electric14monkey
Imagine a giant Chinese dragon made of exploding drones coming over the horizon only to be the last thing you see on this earth. I mean I’d prefer that over a mushroom cloud I suppose.
想象一条由爆炸无人机组成的巨大中国龙出现在地平线上，成为你在这个世界上看到的最后一幕。我想，这比看到蘑菇云要好一些吧。
Imagine a giant Chinese dragon made of exploding drones coming over the horizon only to be the last thing you see on this earth. I mean I’d prefer that over a mushroom cloud I suppose.
想象一条由爆炸无人机组成的巨大中国龙出现在地平线上，成为你在这个世界上看到的最后一幕。我想，这比看到蘑菇云要好一些吧。
221missile
The main defense is the advent of microwave weapons.
主要的防御手段是微波武器的出现。
The main defense is the advent of microwave weapons.
主要的防御手段是微波武器的出现。
frohnaldo
If they’re in a swarm with explosive all you gotta do is pop one
如果它们是一群携带爆炸物的无人机，你只要引爆其中一架就行了。
If they’re in a swarm with explosive all you gotta do is pop one
如果它们是一群携带爆炸物的无人机，你只要引爆其中一架就行了。
JackSpyder
Grenades are not that explosive despite what the movies say. It wouldn't ignite an airborne swarm. Shrapnel might take out a neighbour but unlikely. They could maintain a distributed distance. They wouldn't come head on, they'd come from all directions in 360 at 200mph with wide spread. Undefendable.
手榴弹并没有电影里演的那么具有爆炸力。它不会引爆空中的无人机群。弹片可能会击中相邻的无人机，但可能性不大。它们可以保持分散的距离。它们不会正面袭来，而是会从360度的各个方向以200英里的时速广泛分散开来。这根本无法防御。
Grenades are not that explosive despite what the movies say. It wouldn't ignite an airborne swarm. Shrapnel might take out a neighbour but unlikely. They could maintain a distributed distance. They wouldn't come head on, they'd come from all directions in 360 at 200mph with wide spread. Undefendable.
手榴弹并没有电影里演的那么具有爆炸力。它不会引爆空中的无人机群。弹片可能会击中相邻的无人机，但可能性不大。它们可以保持分散的距离。它们不会正面袭来，而是会从360度的各个方向以200英里的时速广泛分散开来。这根本无法防御。
digitizeBG
I imagine the ending to matrix where the swarm breached the underground city.. No amount of bullets is going to stop that swarm.
我想象的是《黑客帝国》结尾那一幕，无人机群突破了地下城市……再多的子弹也无法阻挡那群无人机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I imagine the ending to matrix where the swarm breached the underground city.. No amount of bullets is going to stop that swarm.
我想象的是《黑客帝国》结尾那一幕，无人机群突破了地下城市……再多的子弹也无法阻挡那群无人机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
curiouslyendearing
Flak cannon and laser gun over here like; am I joke to you?
这边的防空炮和激光枪就像在说：你当我是个摆设？
Flak cannon and laser gun over here like; am I joke to you?
这边的防空炮和激光枪就像在说：你当我是个摆设？
JackSpyder
I've played ureal tournament too since day 1. The earlity is humans become irrelevant.
我也从第一天开始就玩《虚幻竞技场》了。早期的时候，人类就变得无关紧要了。
I've played ureal tournament too since day 1. The earlity is humans become irrelevant.
我也从第一天开始就玩《虚幻竞技场》了。早期的时候，人类就变得无关紧要了。
SleepWouldBeNice
Getting a preview in Ukraine. With the cancellation of the Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft program, the US Army sends to be taking lessons from Ukraine seriously.
乌克兰战场成了预演。随着“未来攻击侦察机”项目的取消，美国陆军似乎正在认真从乌克兰战场吸取教训。
Getting a preview in Ukraine. With the cancellation of the Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft program, the US Army sends to be taking lessons from Ukraine seriously.
乌克兰战场成了预演。随着“未来攻击侦察机”项目的取消，美国陆军似乎正在认真从乌克兰战场吸取教训。
Lord_Stonepaw
No, that's not how it works. Electric warfare would make those drones useless almost instantly. It's highly effective in Ukraine. Both sides use jammers (of varying power levels), that make flying drones very difficult. All the drone footage you see is mostly successful, what you don't see are the unsuccessful strikes. If a massive swarm like this video would be effective you would have seen russia or Ukraine use them already.
不，事情并不是那样的。电子战几乎能立即让这些无人机失去作用。在乌克兰，电子战非常有效。双方都在使用（不同功率级别的）干扰器，这让无人机飞行变得非常困难。你看到的所有无人机画面大多都是成功的案例，而你看不到的是那些失败的袭击。如果像这个视频中那样的大规模无人机群真的有效，那你早就看到俄罗斯或乌克兰使用它们了。
No, that's not how it works. Electric warfare would make those drones useless almost instantly. It's highly effective in Ukraine. Both sides use jammers (of varying power levels), that make flying drones very difficult. All the drone footage you see is mostly successful, what you don't see are the unsuccessful strikes. If a massive swarm like this video would be effective you would have seen russia or Ukraine use them already.
不，事情并不是那样的。电子战几乎能立即让这些无人机失去作用。在乌克兰，电子战非常有效。双方都在使用（不同功率级别的）干扰器，这让无人机飞行变得非常困难。你看到的所有无人机画面大多都是成功的案例，而你看不到的是那些失败的袭击。如果像这个视频中那样的大规模无人机群真的有效，那你早就看到俄罗斯或乌克兰使用它们了。
JackSpyder
True for sure with constant communication swarms with central control. But if distributed and independently acting (not hard) EMP is copium.
对于持续通信且由中央控制的集群来说，这无疑是正确的。但如果（系统）是分布式且独立运行的（这并不难实现），那么电磁脉冲（EMP）就是幻想中的救命稻草。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
True for sure with constant communication swarms with central control. But if distributed and independently acting (not hard) EMP is copium.
对于持续通信且由中央控制的集群来说，这无疑是正确的。但如果（系统）是分布式且独立运行的（这并不难实现），那么电磁脉冲（EMP）就是幻想中的救命稻草。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Lord_Stonepaw
If it wasn't hard why aren't the Ukrainian/ russians using it? There have been some interesting developments in AI targeting but most of that is still on trail run. Even then it's more of home on last target and still requires an FPV pilot to guide the drone to the target and the AI takes over the last part. It's really hard to get AI algorithms on a drone that small, that's cheap enough to throw away each and every time. No EMP is needed, these are capabilities already fielded by both armies. The war of 2023 is not the war of 2025.
如果它不难实现，为什么乌克兰/俄罗斯没有使用呢？在人工智能瞄准方面确实有一些有趣的发展，但其中大部分仍处于试验阶段。即便如此，也更多是在最后锁定目标时起作用，仍然需要一名第一人称视角飞行员引导无人机接近目标，然后由人工智能接管最后一部分。要在那么小、那么便宜的无人机上安装人工智能算法，每次用完就扔掉，这真的很难。根本不需要电磁脉冲，这些能力两军都已经具备了。技术发展水平今非昔比了
If it wasn't hard why aren't the Ukrainian/ russians using it? There have been some interesting developments in AI targeting but most of that is still on trail run. Even then it's more of home on last target and still requires an FPV pilot to guide the drone to the target and the AI takes over the last part. It's really hard to get AI algorithms on a drone that small, that's cheap enough to throw away each and every time. No EMP is needed, these are capabilities already fielded by both armies. The war of 2023 is not the war of 2025.
如果它不难实现，为什么乌克兰/俄罗斯没有使用呢？在人工智能瞄准方面确实有一些有趣的发展，但其中大部分仍处于试验阶段。即便如此，也更多是在最后锁定目标时起作用，仍然需要一名第一人称视角飞行员引导无人机接近目标，然后由人工智能接管最后一部分。要在那么小、那么便宜的无人机上安装人工智能算法，每次用完就扔掉，这真的很难。根本不需要电磁脉冲，这些能力两军都已经具备了。技术发展水平今非昔比了
JackSpyder
You're right but also wrong a bit. Swarm drone processing against a simple single target is a lot less "AI' processing than you think. Basic 6 DOD nabigation of 1000 drones distribhteded evenly to a target isn't AI software. This could be dumb drone via a single fire and forget order for 10000 payloads.
The AI stuff miggt come into play for interceptor drones but is absolutely not required for attack drones.
你说得对，但也有点偏差。针对单一简单目标的无人机集群处理，其所需的“人工智能”处理能力其实远没有你想象的那么多。1000架无人机均匀分布并朝向目标进行基本的六自由度导航，并不是依靠人工智能软件来实现的。这可以通过一个“发射后不管”的指令，让10000个载荷（译注：这里指无人机携带的武器或设备）以“傻瓜式”无人机的方式执行任务。对于拦截无人机来说，人工智能技术可能会发挥作用，但对于攻击无人机而言，则完全不需要。
You're right but also wrong a bit. Swarm drone processing against a simple single target is a lot less "AI' processing than you think. Basic 6 DOD nabigation of 1000 drones distribhteded evenly to a target isn't AI software. This could be dumb drone via a single fire and forget order for 10000 payloads.
The AI stuff miggt come into play for interceptor drones but is absolutely not required for attack drones.
你说得对，但也有点偏差。针对单一简单目标的无人机集群处理，其所需的“人工智能”处理能力其实远没有你想象的那么多。1000架无人机均匀分布并朝向目标进行基本的六自由度导航，并不是依靠人工智能软件来实现的。这可以通过一个“发射后不管”的指令，让10000个载荷（译注：这里指无人机携带的武器或设备）以“傻瓜式”无人机的方式执行任务。对于拦截无人机来说，人工智能技术可能会发挥作用，但对于攻击无人机而言，则完全不需要。
JackSpyder
Your only option is a twice as big half as cheap swarm. We're now fully in the era where no defence can overcome offence. So it's genuinely MAD. Mutually assured destruction by offence, and without nukes.
你唯一的选择是数量翻倍但成本减半的无人机集群。我们现在已经完全进入了一个防御无法战胜进攻的时代。所以这真的是一种相互确保摧毁的状态，而且还不需要核武器。
Your only option is a twice as big half as cheap swarm. We're now fully in the era where no defence can overcome offence. So it's genuinely MAD. Mutually assured destruction by offence, and without nukes.
你唯一的选择是数量翻倍但成本减半的无人机集群。我们现在已经完全进入了一个防御无法战胜进攻的时代。所以这真的是一种相互确保摧毁的状态，而且还不需要核武器。
chadcultist
EMPs? Will we kill tech to save ourselves?
电磁脉冲？我们会为了自救而摧毁技术吗？
EMPs? Will we kill tech to save ourselves?
电磁脉冲？我们会为了自救而摧毁技术吗？
redditingtonviking
The EMP arsenal is kind of limited at the moment. From what I could find on Wikipedia, other than natural EMPs like lightning strikes there are really just two categories of EMPs. There are nuclear EMPs where the EMP itself is just a secondary effect of a nuclear strike, which are probably too destructive for this kind of purpose, and there are non-nuclear EMPs that have fairly limited blast range, and hence not capable of dealing with this kind of swarm.
Unless there are more effective NNEMPs I’m not aware of, I believe the more cost effective ways of dealing with potential drone swarms are factory sabotage and counter drones.
目前的电磁脉冲武器库相当有限。根据我在维基百科上查到的信息，除了自然产生的电磁脉冲（如闪电袭击）外，电磁脉冲主要分为两类。一类是核电磁脉冲，其中电磁脉冲本身只是核打击的次要效应，这种可能对此类目的来说破坏性太大；另一类是非核电磁脉冲，其爆炸范围相当有限，因此无法应对此类无人机集群。
除非有我不知道的更有效的非核电磁脉冲武器，我认为应对潜在无人机集群更具成本效益的方法是工厂破坏和反无人机技术。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The EMP arsenal is kind of limited at the moment. From what I could find on Wikipedia, other than natural EMPs like lightning strikes there are really just two categories of EMPs. There are nuclear EMPs where the EMP itself is just a secondary effect of a nuclear strike, which are probably too destructive for this kind of purpose, and there are non-nuclear EMPs that have fairly limited blast range, and hence not capable of dealing with this kind of swarm.
Unless there are more effective NNEMPs I’m not aware of, I believe the more cost effective ways of dealing with potential drone swarms are factory sabotage and counter drones.
目前的电磁脉冲武器库相当有限。根据我在维基百科上查到的信息，除了自然产生的电磁脉冲（如闪电袭击）外，电磁脉冲主要分为两类。一类是核电磁脉冲，其中电磁脉冲本身只是核打击的次要效应，这种可能对此类目的来说破坏性太大；另一类是非核电磁脉冲，其爆炸范围相当有限，因此无法应对此类无人机集群。
除非有我不知道的更有效的非核电磁脉冲武器，我认为应对潜在无人机集群更具成本效益的方法是工厂破坏和反无人机技术。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
curiouslyendearing
I mean, if they're that close together old school flak cannon will do for most of them. Get dozens with each shot. Even spreading them out, it would still be wildly effective.
Drones are cheap compared to missiles, but shells with timers are even cheaper. Especially if you put a range finder on the cannon that can auto set the timer on the shells somehow.
Drones are scary and will change things, but they're not the op end game weapon a lot of people think they are.
我是说，如果它们靠得那么近，老式的防空炮就能对付大部分。每一炮都能打下数十架。即使把它们分散开，防空炮仍然会非常有效。
与导弹相比，无人机很便宜，但带定时引信的炮弹更便宜。特别是如果你能在防空炮上装一个测距仪，以某种方式自动设置炮弹的引信时间。
无人机很吓人，会改变很多事情，但它们并不是很多人认为的那种终极武器。
I mean, if they're that close together old school flak cannon will do for most of them. Get dozens with each shot. Even spreading them out, it would still be wildly effective.
Drones are cheap compared to missiles, but shells with timers are even cheaper. Especially if you put a range finder on the cannon that can auto set the timer on the shells somehow.
Drones are scary and will change things, but they're not the op end game weapon a lot of people think they are.
我是说，如果它们靠得那么近，老式的防空炮就能对付大部分。每一炮都能打下数十架。即使把它们分散开，防空炮仍然会非常有效。
与导弹相比，无人机很便宜，但带定时引信的炮弹更便宜。特别是如果你能在防空炮上装一个测距仪，以某种方式自动设置炮弹的引信时间。
无人机很吓人，会改变很多事情，但它们并不是很多人认为的那种终极武器。
Prestigious-Duck6615
flak cannon is not valuable when the drone swarm is 8 feet off the ground
当无人机集群距离地面仅8英尺时，防空炮就没什么用了。
flak cannon is not valuable when the drone swarm is 8 feet off the ground
当无人机集群距离地面仅8英尺时，防空炮就没什么用了。
ResidentBackground35
Em jamming, airburst programmable munitions, directed energy weapon, directed em weapon. You know the sort of weapons that have been in various stages of development for the past decade.
Or the ones currently being used in Ukraine to combat FPV drones, or the fact that while these demonstrations are impressive the technology to use this in a military fashion doesn't exist and will take years to develop.
Which might be why the US is interested in slowing down Chinese microprocessor development and thus slow down the development of autonomous weapons.
I mean China scary, capitalist military weak and decadent.
电磁干扰、空中爆炸可编程弹药、定向能武器、定向电磁武器。你知道，这些武器在过去十年中一直处于不同的发展阶段。
或者，那些在乌克兰目前正被用来对抗第一人称视角无人机的武器，或者这样一个事实：虽然这些演示令人印象深刻，但以军事方式应用这项技术还不存在，并且需要数年时间才能开发出来。
这可能就是为什么美国对减缓中国微处理器开发感兴趣，从而减缓自主武器开发的原因。
我是说，中国令人害怕，资本主义国家的军队则软弱且颓废。
Em jamming, airburst programmable munitions, directed energy weapon, directed em weapon. You know the sort of weapons that have been in various stages of development for the past decade.
Or the ones currently being used in Ukraine to combat FPV drones, or the fact that while these demonstrations are impressive the technology to use this in a military fashion doesn't exist and will take years to develop.
Which might be why the US is interested in slowing down Chinese microprocessor development and thus slow down the development of autonomous weapons.
I mean China scary, capitalist military weak and decadent.
电磁干扰、空中爆炸可编程弹药、定向能武器、定向电磁武器。你知道，这些武器在过去十年中一直处于不同的发展阶段。
或者，那些在乌克兰目前正被用来对抗第一人称视角无人机的武器，或者这样一个事实：虽然这些演示令人印象深刻，但以军事方式应用这项技术还不存在，并且需要数年时间才能开发出来。
这可能就是为什么美国对减缓中国微处理器开发感兴趣，从而减缓自主武器开发的原因。
我是说，中国令人害怕，资本主义国家的军队则软弱且颓废。
chadcultist
You put too much belief and faith in US propaganda. They are literally displaying their military drone capabilities in the video above. Just strap some explosive rounds and they are extremely militarily effective. They are in fact MORE advanced than us in swarm drone tech and a few other areas. Nativity and ignorance will be the biggest problem going forward.
Thinking the US is hindering Chinas chip evolution is comedy in its purest form. Quite similar to how the US claims China receives no gpus. Meanwhile China sells their excess machine learning compute (gpus) on eBay for 50% discount
你对美国宣传太过信以为真了。他们在上面的视频中展示的正是他们的军用无人机能力。只要装上一些爆炸性弹药，它们的军事效力就极强。事实上，他们在无人机集群技术和其他一些领域比我们还要先进。天真和无知将是未来最大的问题。
认为美国正在阻碍中国的芯片发展，这是最纯粹的笑话。这很像美国声称中国得不到图形处理器，而与此同时，中国却在eBay上以50%的折扣出售他们多余的机器学习计算设备。
You put too much belief and faith in US propaganda. They are literally displaying their military drone capabilities in the video above. Just strap some explosive rounds and they are extremely militarily effective. They are in fact MORE advanced than us in swarm drone tech and a few other areas. Nativity and ignorance will be the biggest problem going forward.
Thinking the US is hindering Chinas chip evolution is comedy in its purest form. Quite similar to how the US claims China receives no gpus. Meanwhile China sells their excess machine learning compute (gpus) on eBay for 50% discount
你对美国宣传太过信以为真了。他们在上面的视频中展示的正是他们的军用无人机能力。只要装上一些爆炸性弹药，它们的军事效力就极强。事实上，他们在无人机集群技术和其他一些领域比我们还要先进。天真和无知将是未来最大的问题。
认为美国正在阻碍中国的芯片发展，这是最纯粹的笑话。这很像美国声称中国得不到图形处理器，而与此同时，中国却在eBay上以50%的折扣出售他们多余的机器学习计算设备。
PhiIMcHawk
Basically your good run of the mill artillery and fpv drones are causing most of the casualties in the Ukrainian war.
基本上，在乌克兰战争中，造成大部分伤亡的是常规的火炮和第一人称视角无人机。
Basically your good run of the mill artillery and fpv drones are causing most of the casualties in the Ukrainian war.
基本上，在乌克兰战争中，造成大部分伤亡的是常规的火炮和第一人称视角无人机。
snack-dad
Just imagine a dragon flying over your front lines shooting napalm out of its mouth
想象一下一条巨龙飞过你的前线，从嘴里喷出凝固汽油弹。
Just imagine a dragon flying over your front lines shooting napalm out of its mouth
想象一下一条巨龙飞过你的前线，从嘴里喷出凝固汽油弹。
No-Newspaper-2181
I'd just bomb the people operating the drones. They will be close.
我会直接轰炸操控无人机的人。他们肯定在附近。
I'd just bomb the people operating the drones. They will be close.
我会直接轰炸操控无人机的人。他们肯定在附近。
dirkakirka
best the US can do is 3-4 orbs
美国最多只能做到3-4个光球。
best the US can do is 3-4 orbs
美国最多只能做到3-4个光球。
plmunger
And people will swear its aliens
人们会发誓说那是外星人。
And people will swear its aliens
人们会发誓说那是外星人。
ThisDumbApp
Funnily enough I saw a drone last night driving home from work in PA. It was hovering next to the highway. Wasnt a plane or anything, it was stationary just chilling. blxing lights and stuff, pretty large too. So that was interesting. Saw a few other things in the sky that looked similar and didnt move but were too far.
有趣的是，昨晚我下班开车回家路过宾夕法尼亚州时看到了一架无人机。它正悬停在高速公路旁边。那不是飞机或别的什么，它就静静地停在那里。闪着灯，而且体积还挺大。所以觉得挺有意思的。我还看到天空中有一些其他类似的东西，它们一动不动，但距离太远了。
Funnily enough I saw a drone last night driving home from work in PA. It was hovering next to the highway. Wasnt a plane or anything, it was stationary just chilling. blxing lights and stuff, pretty large too. So that was interesting. Saw a few other things in the sky that looked similar and didnt move but were too far.
有趣的是，昨晚我下班开车回家路过宾夕法尼亚州时看到了一架无人机。它正悬停在高速公路旁边。那不是飞机或别的什么，它就静静地停在那里。闪着灯，而且体积还挺大。所以觉得挺有意思的。我还看到天空中有一些其他类似的东西，它们一动不动，但距离太远了。
Gabriel_66
"taking sounds away from fireworks because of animals and autistic people will ruin all firework shows ever"
China: bitch please
“因为动物和自闭症人士而取消烟花的声音会毁掉所有的烟花表演”
中国：（轻蔑地）呵，请吧。
"taking sounds away from fireworks because of animals and autistic people will ruin all firework shows ever"
China: bitch please
“因为动物和自闭症人士而取消烟花的声音会毁掉所有的烟花表演”
中国：（轻蔑地）呵，请吧。
sakumar
Chinese invented fireworks. This is just next level.
中国人发明了烟花。这只是更高一级的（创新）。
Chinese invented fireworks. This is just next level.
中国人发明了烟花。这只是更高一级的（创新）。
Are_you_blind_sir
Its better for the environment
这对环境更有益。
Its better for the environment
这对环境更有益。
Flopsy22
This is incredible. There are so many, it can basically turn into a giant TV in the sky. Wild
这太不可思议了。无人机这么多，基本上可以变成天空中的一台巨型电视。太疯狂了。
This is incredible. There are so many, it can basically turn into a giant TV in the sky. Wild
这太不可思议了。无人机这么多，基本上可以变成天空中的一台巨型电视。太疯狂了。
summer_swag
Imagine when we have crazy batteries.. the skies will be outdoors for advertsiment.
想象一下，当我们有了超牛的电池……天空就会变成户外广告的天地。
Imagine when we have crazy batteries.. the skies will be outdoors for advertsiment.
想象一下，当我们有了超牛的电池……天空就会变成户外广告的天地。
silverking12345
That's one of the challenges. The other is the deafening levels of motor noise.
I'm all for drone deliveries but the noise is a huge limiting factor atm.
这是其中一个挑战。另一个挑战是震耳欲聋的马达噪音。我全力支持无人机送货，但目前噪音是一个巨大的限制因素。
That's one of the challenges. The other is the deafening levels of motor noise.
I'm all for drone deliveries but the noise is a huge limiting factor atm.
这是其中一个挑战。另一个挑战是震耳欲聋的马达噪音。我全力支持无人机送货，但目前噪音是一个巨大的限制因素。
sciguy52
That is a very beautiful display. Well done. Can anyone tell me what the Chinese words were?
那是一场非常精彩的展示。做得好。有人能告诉我那些中文是什么吗？
That is a very beautiful display. Well done. Can anyone tell me what the Chinese words were?
那是一场非常精彩的展示。做得好。有人能告诉我那些中文是什么吗？
LaughinKooka
If you pause, you should be able to see both English and Chinese, almost carry the identical meaning
Except “maybe shenzhen” should have been translated to “(fully of/land of) opportunities, Shenzhen” instead. Maybe sounded a bit wacky
如果你暂停一下，应该能看到英文和中文几乎表达了相同的意思，
除了“maybe Shenzhen”应该翻译成“（充满/是）机遇之地，深圳”更好。可能原译文听起来有点怪。
If you pause, you should be able to see both English and Chinese, almost carry the identical meaning
Except “maybe shenzhen” should have been translated to “(fully of/land of) opportunities, Shenzhen” instead. Maybe sounded a bit wacky
如果你暂停一下，应该能看到英文和中文几乎表达了相同的意思，
除了“maybe Shenzhen”应该翻译成“（充满/是）机遇之地，深圳”更好。可能原译文听起来有点怪。
btsd_
Man, this would make one hell of a space invaders arcade settup if you had enough drones. Just like in the movie pixels
伙计，如果你有足够的无人机，这绝对能打造一个超棒的《太空侵略者》街机设置。就像电影《像素大战》里那样。
Man, this would make one hell of a space invaders arcade settup if you had enough drones. Just like in the movie pixels
伙计，如果你有足够的无人机，这绝对能打造一个超棒的《太空侵略者》街机设置。就像电影《像素大战》里那样。
silverking12345
It could work but I doubt it'll last more than a couple levels.
这可能会奏效，但我怀疑它撑不过几关。
It could work but I doubt it'll last more than a couple levels.
这可能会奏效，但我怀疑它撑不过几关。
Alundor
Imagine traveling back in time and displaying this to the people 100 years ago
想象一下穿越回100年前，向那时的人们展示这个。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Imagine traveling back in time and displaying this to the people 100 years ago
想象一下穿越回100年前，向那时的人们展示这个。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
skoold1
Make it 1000 years ago. They will 100% think it's alien technology.
把它放到1000年前，他们肯定会认为这是外星科技。
Make it 1000 years ago. They will 100% think it's alien technology.
把它放到1000年前，他们肯定会认为这是外星科技。
JapanEngineer
Drone world wars are not gonna be fun.
无人机世界大战可不会好玩。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Drone world wars are not gonna be fun.
无人机世界大战可不会好玩。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Vertitto
for real this time or post production again?
这次是来真的，还是又是事后诸葛亮？
for real this time or post production again?
这次是来真的，还是又是事后诸葛亮？
很赞 18
收藏