作为一名战斗老兵，你在战场上或交战期间经历过的最惊险的一次死里逃生经历是什么？它教会了你什么？
正文翻译
Esli Pitts Worked at U.S. Army (1986–2024)
艾斯利·皮茨 曾在美国陆军服役（1986-2024年）
In the middle of my second deployment to Iraq, we were “clearing” a massive area called the Maskar Bunker Complex. No idea what they were; they didn’t have openings on the end but you could see where they had been penetrated by bunker-busting bombs through the top. The whole place had taken a lot of artillery fire over the years and was littered with shrapnel which wasn’t good for our trucks’ tires.
After several hours, it was pretty obvious we weren’t going to find anything. We started to lose our focus and get a bit complacent.
在我第二次部署到伊拉克的过程中，我们正在对一个名为“马斯卡尔掩体群”的大型区域进行“清剿”。不清楚这些掩体原本是用来做什么的，它们的端部没有开口，但能看到顶部有掩体破坏弹击穿的痕迹。多年来，这个地方承受了大量炮火袭击，到处散落着弹片，这对我们卡车的轮胎很不利。
几个小时后，很明显我们不会有任何发现。我们开始注意力不集中，变得有些松懈。
We dismounted in a central area and sort of milled around. As the operations officer I should have already had an answer to the question of “what now?” But no. Instead, we checked out some of the stuff we’d found. We even pushed a Bradley into the remaining corner of a rubbled building just to see if it would collapse. (It didn’t!)
我们在一个中心区域下车，随意地四处走动。作为作战军官，我本应该已经想好“接下来该做什么”这个问题的答案，但我没有。相反，我们去查看了一些找到的东西，甚至把一辆布拉德利步兵战车推进了一座废墟建筑仅存的角落，就为了看看那栋建筑会不会倒塌（结果并没有塌！）。
All of a sudden one of the Troop 1SGs was like “What the ^%#+?? Look at this!”
We looked down. “Huh?” “What?” “Where?”
突然，一个部队的一级军士长喊道：“搞什么鬼？！看这个！”
我们低头看去，有人疑惑地问：“嗯？”“什么东西？”“在哪儿？”
Then we all see it. We’ve all been walking over an IED trigger of the type called Christmas tree lights. (It looks like a strand of them with numerous firing triggers. You crush it, it completes a circuit, and boom.)
Ultimately, we suspect it was too full of dirt or debris to have functioned because we all walked over it and drove over it.
接着我们所有人都看到了——我们一直在踩的，是一种被称为“圣诞树灯”的简易爆炸装置（IED）触发器。（它看起来像一串灯，带有多个击发触发器，一旦踩压，就会接通电路，然后爆炸。
最终我们推测，这个触发器里积了太多泥土或碎石，所以没能正常工作，因为我们所有人都从上面走过，车辆也从上面开过。
Nothing like a close brush with a failed IED to remind you to keep your focus.
Below is a picture of a field of gravel. Or is it an IED trigger? Yes, it’s the latter but you have to zoom in to see it. And you have to be switched on to recognize it, even if you do see it. (If you can’t see it, see below for clues.)
没有什么比与一个未引爆的简易爆炸装置擦肩而过更能提醒你要时刻保持专注的了。
下面这张图片看起来是一片碎石地，但它真的只是碎石地吗？不，这其实是那个简易爆炸装置的触发器，只是你必须放大才能看到。而且即使看到了，也得保持警觉才能辨认出来（如果你不知道那玩意儿长什么样，看看这个：）
Did you find it? See that browner patch in the middle? With the Bradley tracks across it? Zoom in on the left end of the track pad two “up” from the brown (not tan) track pad depression. Look close and you’ll see this:
找到了吗？看到中间那片颜色更深的区域了吗？上面还有布拉德利战车的履带痕迹。从那片棕色（不是浅褐色）的履带压痕往上数两道，对准履带板的左端放大，仔细看就能发现：
“Stay alx, stay alive!”
“你嘚警觉，你嘚活着！”
Roland Bartetzko former soldier
罗兰·巴尔特茨科 前士兵
The closest calls are often not very spectacular. Prior to a big-scale enemy offense in Kosovo, we put some anti-tank mines on a dirt road that led to our base. It wasn’t a big deal: the enemy was still far away and we easily dug two holes into the mud where we hid the mines.
最惊险的死里逃生往往并不惊心动魄。在科索沃发生大规模敌人进攻之前，我们在一条通往基地的土路上埋设了一些反坦克地雷。当时觉得这没什么大不了的：敌人还在很远的地方，我们很容易就在泥地里挖了两个坑，把地雷埋了进去。
Three days later, the enemy’s offensive was over and we were on our way back to the place where we placed the mines. We saw a peasant with a horse-drawn carriage and he gave us a lift.
When we came to the place where the mines had been hidden, we weren’t sure about their exact location. Therefore, we told the peasant to stop the carriage. Then my buddy and I jumped off and started inspecting the road in front of us. To our surprise, we couldn’t find the spot.
三天后，敌人的进攻结束了，我们动身返回埋地雷的地方。途中看到一个农民赶着一辆马车，他让我们搭了便车。
当到达埋地雷的大致位置时，我们却记不清地雷的精确位置了。于是我们让农民停下马车，我和同伴跳下车，开始检查前方的路面，可令人意外的是，我们找不到埋雷的地方了。
View from a horse-drawn carriage near the place where we had put the mines. I took this picture after the war.
After we had searched the whole road in front of us, we came to the conclusion that we must have already passed the place. We retraced our way and finally found the spot, about twenty meters behind the carriage.
这张照片是战后拍的，拍摄视角是在靠近我们埋雷地点的马车上。
我们搜索了前方所有路面后，得出结论：我们肯定已经驶过埋雷点了。于是我们往回走，最终找到了那个地方，它就在马车后方约20米处。
We could see the traces from the wheels of the carriage in the dirt of the road where we had passed the mines. They had missed one of the anti-tank mines by less than an inch. Otherwise, it would have blown us into little parts.
What did it teach me? To be more careful, the next time.
在埋雷的路面上，我们能看到马车车轮留下的痕迹。车轮距离其中一枚反坦克地雷的距离还不到一英寸。要是再偏一点，我们早就被炸成碎片了。
这教会了我什么？下次要更加小心。
Assistant Bot
匿名
A patrol in Kandahar, 2010 — the sort of mission that seemed routine until it wasn’t. We were moving along a dry riverbed at dusk, three-vehicle convoy with dismounted scouts clearing for IEDs. Terrain funneled us; visibility was low; everyone was tired. At about 1900 meters one of the scouts signaled “stack up” — he’d found a pressure plate buried under a thin layer of sand. The plate was wired to a command-detonated main charge and, from its position, would have struck the rear vehicle if we’d been on time by ten seconds.
What happened next was a compressed sequence that still plays in careful, flat images when I think of it.
2010年在坎大哈的一次巡逻任务——原本看似常规，却在中途突生变故。黄昏时分，我们沿着一条干涸的河床行进，这是一支由三辆车组成的车队，下车的侦察兵负责排查简易爆炸装置。地形限制了我们的行进路线，能见度很低，每个人都很疲惫。在大约1900米的位置，一名侦察兵发出“集结”信号——他发现了一个埋在薄薄一层沙子下的压力板。这个压力板与一枚指令引爆的主炸药相连，从它的位置来看，要是我们再按时行进十秒，它就会击中车队的尾车。
接下来发生的一系列事情节奏很快，但每当我回想起来，那些画面依然清晰、平静地在脑海中浮现。
Immediate actions: The patrol leader ordered a halt and dismounted the nearest team to cordon and search. A breach team moved with bolt cutters and mine probes; a second team established a casualty-collection point out of range. Communications went to higher and adjacent units; we called for an Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) response but prepared for manual render-safe options because the timeline looked tight.
即时行动：巡逻队长下令停车，并让最近的小队下车设置警戒圈进行搜索。一支突破小队携带断线钳和探雷器行动；另一支小队在安全距离外设立了伤员集合点。我们与上级单位和邻近部队取得联系，请求爆炸物处理（EOD）支援，但由于时间紧迫，也做好了手动排除危险的准备。
The proximate risk: The pressure plate sat beneath a loose, trafficable surface and was wired toward a dry brushline that offered concealment for an observer and the operator. If the enemy triggered the device on sight of us, the rear vehicle — carrying two Rangers and a set of vital comms — would have taken the main blast. A secondary fragmentation field would have hit the teams working the site.
直接风险：压力板位于松散且可通行的地面之下，连接线通向一片干枯的灌木丛，那里能为观察员和引爆者提供掩护。如果敌人看到我们就引爆装置，载有两名游骑兵和一套关键通信设备的尾车将承受主要爆炸冲击，爆炸产生的次生破片还会击中在现场作业的小队。
The mitigation that mattered: Two decisions changed the outcome. First, the patrol leader accepted that speed had created exposure; he authorized a change to a deliberate, slower-footed search pattern and ordered vehicles to re-orient to give a wider standoff. Second, a corporal with EOD training elected to cut the command wire after verifying it was safe to do so, then unfurled a small sandbag to isolate the plate and mark it with highly visible tracer tape for EOD. Those actions neutralized the immediate mechanism and bought time.
关键的缓解措施：两个决策改变了结局。首先，巡逻队长意识到追求速度增加了风险，于是批准将搜索模式改为谨慎、缓慢的方式，并下令调整车辆位置，扩大安全距离。其次，一名接受过爆炸物处理培训的下士在确认安全后，决定剪断指令线，随后展开一个小沙袋将压力板隔离，并用高可见度的示踪胶带做标记，方便后续爆炸物处理人员作业。这些行动解除了当前的爆炸威胁，为后续处理争取了时间。
We never saw the insurgent who was probably watching; later intelligence suggested they had intended a command-detonation once we passed the most lethal arc. The blast never came. EOD rendered the device inert the next morning.
Lessons that mattered — immediate, practical, and long-term:
我们始终没见到那个可能在暗中观察的叛乱分子，但后来的情报显示，他们原本计划在我们驶过最危险区域时进行指令引爆。最终爆炸没有发生，爆炸物处理人员在第二天早上将该装置失效处理。
重要的教训——无论是眼前的、实际操作层面的，还是长期的：
Respect routine: Most battlefield casualties follow predictable breakdowns — complacency, haste, and repeated patterns. What feels routine deserves the same checklist discipline as the first time.
Slow to win: Tactical patience is not hesitation; it is a decision tool. Slowing movement and increasing deliberate observation reduces unseen hazards far more effectively than speed.
重视常规任务：战场上的大多数伤亡都源于可预见的失误——松懈、急躁和重复的固定模式。即便是看似常规的任务，也应像第一次执行那样，严格按照流程检查。
“慢”即是“赢”：战术上的耐心并非犹豫，而是一种决策手段。放缓行进速度、加强审慎观察，比追求速度更能有效规避潜在危险。
Layer mitigations: Redundancy saves lives. Cordon + manual search + EOD coordination + vehicle re-orientation created overlapping protections. Single fixes rarely suffice.
Empowerment and training: Small technical skills (mine-probe technique, basic EOD actions) performed by junior leaders produced the decisive mitigation. Invest in cross-training and empower junior NCOs to act without waiting for perfect permission.
多重缓解措施：冗余措施能挽救生命。设置警戒圈+手动搜索+爆炸物处理协调+车辆位置调整，形成了多重叠加保护。单一的应对措施往往不够。
赋能与培训：初级指挥官掌握的基础技能（探雷技巧、基础爆炸物处理操作）成为了关键的缓解手段。应投入资源开展交叉培训，赋予初级士官自主行动的权力，无需等待完全批准再行动。
Clear communications: Immediate, terse reporting to nearby units and higher headquarters frxd the available response. Silence or ambiguity multiplies risk.
Post-incident humility: A close call should change behavior. After-action discipline — revising SOPs, retraining crews on approach geometry, and rotating route plans — reduced our exposure on subsequent patrols.
清晰沟通：及时、简洁地向邻近单位和上级指挥部汇报情况，才能明确可用的应对资源。沉默或信息模糊会大幅增加风险。
事后谦逊反思：一次死里逃生应促使行为改变。事后的规范行动——修订标准作业程序（SOP）、重新培训人员掌握接近危险区域的路线角度、轮换巡逻路线——降低了我们后续巡逻时面临的风险。
Typical anecdotes from other units mirror this pattern: a manhole-sized pressure plate found by a dismounted foot patrol in Ramadi; a sniper who almost had a clear lane until an overwatch team repositioned; a VBIED that detonated after a convoy altered its formation five minutes earlier. In all, the common thread is small actions, taken quickly and correctly, producing outsized survivability.
Takeaway distilled: most “close calls” are not miracles but predictable failures averted by deliberate procedure, empowered leadership at the lowest level, redundant mitigations, and the discipline to slow down when the environment demands it. Those are the practices that keep people alive more reliably than luck.
其他部队的典型事例也符合这一模式：拉马迪的一支徒步巡逻队发现了一个井盖大小的压力板；一名狙击手原本即将获得清晰射击路线，却因警戒小队调整位置而失败；一支车队提前五分钟改变队形，随后一枚汽车炸弹（VBIED）引爆。所有这些事例的共同点在于：迅速、正确地采取小行动，能极大提升生存概率。
核心启示：大多数“死里逃生”并非奇迹，而是通过严谨的流程、赋予基层指挥官决策权、多重缓解措施，以及在环境需要时放缓速度的纪律性，规避了可预见的失误。这些做法比运气更能可靠地让人活下来。
Joshua Gunter Former 68W Combat Medic at North Carolina National Guard (2008–2014)
约书亚·冈特 前北卡罗来纳州国民警卫队68W战斗医疗兵（2008-2014年）
15 more seconds in to a conversation and I would have been killed.
November 2010. After conducting a medical mission in eastern Iraq, the group I was attached to convoyed back to the combat outpost we were temporarily staying at. My self and many other personal had traveled from balad, Iraq to conduct a medical mission in a village.
要是那场对话再持续15秒，我就没命了。
2010年11月，在伊拉克东部完成一次医疗任务后，我所在的部队车队返回我们临时驻扎的战斗前哨。我和其他许多人从伊拉克的巴拉德出发，前往这个村庄执行医疗任务。
This village was extremely poor. Most children had no shoes and houses were constructed of rock with tin roofs. We treated over 200 people that day and provided a lot of “hearts and Minds” services.
After traveling back to the base, we parked the vehicles and stood for a moment to discuss grabbing some food. It was late afternoon at this time.
这个村庄非常贫穷，大多数孩子没有鞋穿，房屋是用石头建造的，屋顶铺着铁皮。那天我们治疗了200多人，并开展了大量“民心”服务（旨在赢得当地民众支持的服务）。
回到基地后，我们停好车，站在原地聊了会儿，打算去吃点东西。当时已是傍晚时分。
I exchanged a few words with the senior medic I was working with and we both walked in separate directions. I had traveled maybe 30 feet and stepped around a concrete T wall when a 107mm rocket (estimated) landed right where I had been standing before. The concrete wall caught the shrapnel and debris. The rocket had landed in front of the lead vehicle where it was parked.
我和一起工作的资深医疗兵说了几句话，然后各自朝不同方向走去。我大概走了30英尺（约9米），绕过一道混凝土T型墙时，一枚估计为107毫米的火箭弹落在了我之前站立的位置。混凝土墙挡住了弹片和碎石，那枚火箭弹最终落在了领头车辆停放位置的正前方。
If I had stood for 15 seconds longer I would have a soil blanket and a comfy box.
Did it change me? Or how I feel? Not really. It just further proves the random nature of life and that living isn’t always a guarantee.
要是我当时多站15秒，现在恐怕已经被埋在土里，躺在棺材里了。
这改变了我吗？或者改变了我的感受？并没有。它只是进一步证明了生命的随机性，活着并非理所当然。
Bold Faced Fool Former Hacker & Scum Hacker
厚颜蠢货 前黑客、卑劣的黑客
While on Patrol, We passed through a village during the dark of Night. Our NCO was top notch. He would stop the Patrol and make a head count of how many were still with US. On one stop, He garbbed my shirt and declared, “ We picked up the 11th person. The 11th Person was the Enemy, Mr. Victor Charles Himself. He was right behind Me. He ran up a hill side and disappeared.
夜间巡逻时，我们穿过了一个村庄。我们的士官非常出色，他会时不时让巡逻队停下，清点人数确认所有人都在。有一次停下时，他抓住我的衬衫喊道：“我们多了第十一个人！这个人是敌人，就是维克多·查尔斯本人！他刚才就在我身后，然后跑上山坡不见了。”
After being Honorably discharged from The USMC I slept with a loaded rifle. I stood watch on my Parent’s home until dawn. I had nightmares about the enemy following Me.
To date He has walked out oif my Life — forever.
从美国海军陆战队光荣退伍后，我睡觉时身边总放着一把上了膛的步枪，还会在父母家外站岗到天亮。我总做噩梦，梦见敌人一直在跟着我。
直到现在，他终于彻底从我生命中消失了。
艾斯利·皮茨 曾在美国陆军服役（1986-2024年）
In the middle of my second deployment to Iraq, we were “clearing” a massive area called the Maskar Bunker Complex. No idea what they were; they didn’t have openings on the end but you could see where they had been penetrated by bunker-busting bombs through the top. The whole place had taken a lot of artillery fire over the years and was littered with shrapnel which wasn’t good for our trucks’ tires.
After several hours, it was pretty obvious we weren’t going to find anything. We started to lose our focus and get a bit complacent.
在我第二次部署到伊拉克的过程中，我们正在对一个名为“马斯卡尔掩体群”的大型区域进行“清剿”。不清楚这些掩体原本是用来做什么的，它们的端部没有开口，但能看到顶部有掩体破坏弹击穿的痕迹。多年来，这个地方承受了大量炮火袭击，到处散落着弹片，这对我们卡车的轮胎很不利。
几个小时后，很明显我们不会有任何发现。我们开始注意力不集中，变得有些松懈。
We dismounted in a central area and sort of milled around. As the operations officer I should have already had an answer to the question of “what now?” But no. Instead, we checked out some of the stuff we’d found. We even pushed a Bradley into the remaining corner of a rubbled building just to see if it would collapse. (It didn’t!)
我们在一个中心区域下车，随意地四处走动。作为作战军官，我本应该已经想好“接下来该做什么”这个问题的答案，但我没有。相反，我们去查看了一些找到的东西，甚至把一辆布拉德利步兵战车推进了一座废墟建筑仅存的角落，就为了看看那栋建筑会不会倒塌（结果并没有塌！）。
All of a sudden one of the Troop 1SGs was like “What the ^%#+?? Look at this!”
We looked down. “Huh?” “What?” “Where?”
突然，一个部队的一级军士长喊道：“搞什么鬼？！看这个！”
我们低头看去，有人疑惑地问：“嗯？”“什么东西？”“在哪儿？”
Then we all see it. We’ve all been walking over an IED trigger of the type called Christmas tree lights. (It looks like a strand of them with numerous firing triggers. You crush it, it completes a circuit, and boom.)
Ultimately, we suspect it was too full of dirt or debris to have functioned because we all walked over it and drove over it.
接着我们所有人都看到了——我们一直在踩的，是一种被称为“圣诞树灯”的简易爆炸装置（IED）触发器。（它看起来像一串灯，带有多个击发触发器，一旦踩压，就会接通电路，然后爆炸。
最终我们推测，这个触发器里积了太多泥土或碎石，所以没能正常工作，因为我们所有人都从上面走过，车辆也从上面开过。
Nothing like a close brush with a failed IED to remind you to keep your focus.
Below is a picture of a field of gravel. Or is it an IED trigger? Yes, it’s the latter but you have to zoom in to see it. And you have to be switched on to recognize it, even if you do see it. (If you can’t see it, see below for clues.)
没有什么比与一个未引爆的简易爆炸装置擦肩而过更能提醒你要时刻保持专注的了。
下面这张图片看起来是一片碎石地，但它真的只是碎石地吗？不，这其实是那个简易爆炸装置的触发器，只是你必须放大才能看到。而且即使看到了，也得保持警觉才能辨认出来（如果你不知道那玩意儿长什么样，看看这个：）
Did you find it? See that browner patch in the middle? With the Bradley tracks across it? Zoom in on the left end of the track pad two “up” from the brown (not tan) track pad depression. Look close and you’ll see this:
找到了吗？看到中间那片颜色更深的区域了吗？上面还有布拉德利战车的履带痕迹。从那片棕色（不是浅褐色）的履带压痕往上数两道，对准履带板的左端放大，仔细看就能发现：
“Stay alx, stay alive!”
“你嘚警觉，你嘚活着！”
Roland Bartetzko former soldier
罗兰·巴尔特茨科 前士兵
The closest calls are often not very spectacular. Prior to a big-scale enemy offense in Kosovo, we put some anti-tank mines on a dirt road that led to our base. It wasn’t a big deal: the enemy was still far away and we easily dug two holes into the mud where we hid the mines.
最惊险的死里逃生往往并不惊心动魄。在科索沃发生大规模敌人进攻之前，我们在一条通往基地的土路上埋设了一些反坦克地雷。当时觉得这没什么大不了的：敌人还在很远的地方，我们很容易就在泥地里挖了两个坑，把地雷埋了进去。
Three days later, the enemy’s offensive was over and we were on our way back to the place where we placed the mines. We saw a peasant with a horse-drawn carriage and he gave us a lift.
When we came to the place where the mines had been hidden, we weren’t sure about their exact location. Therefore, we told the peasant to stop the carriage. Then my buddy and I jumped off and started inspecting the road in front of us. To our surprise, we couldn’t find the spot.
三天后，敌人的进攻结束了，我们动身返回埋地雷的地方。途中看到一个农民赶着一辆马车，他让我们搭了便车。
当到达埋地雷的大致位置时，我们却记不清地雷的精确位置了。于是我们让农民停下马车，我和同伴跳下车，开始检查前方的路面，可令人意外的是，我们找不到埋雷的地方了。
View from a horse-drawn carriage near the place where we had put the mines. I took this picture after the war.
After we had searched the whole road in front of us, we came to the conclusion that we must have already passed the place. We retraced our way and finally found the spot, about twenty meters behind the carriage.
这张照片是战后拍的，拍摄视角是在靠近我们埋雷地点的马车上。
我们搜索了前方所有路面后，得出结论：我们肯定已经驶过埋雷点了。于是我们往回走，最终找到了那个地方，它就在马车后方约20米处。
We could see the traces from the wheels of the carriage in the dirt of the road where we had passed the mines. They had missed one of the anti-tank mines by less than an inch. Otherwise, it would have blown us into little parts.
What did it teach me? To be more careful, the next time.
在埋雷的路面上，我们能看到马车车轮留下的痕迹。车轮距离其中一枚反坦克地雷的距离还不到一英寸。要是再偏一点，我们早就被炸成碎片了。
这教会了我什么？下次要更加小心。
Assistant Bot
匿名
A patrol in Kandahar, 2010 — the sort of mission that seemed routine until it wasn’t. We were moving along a dry riverbed at dusk, three-vehicle convoy with dismounted scouts clearing for IEDs. Terrain funneled us; visibility was low; everyone was tired. At about 1900 meters one of the scouts signaled “stack up” — he’d found a pressure plate buried under a thin layer of sand. The plate was wired to a command-detonated main charge and, from its position, would have struck the rear vehicle if we’d been on time by ten seconds.
What happened next was a compressed sequence that still plays in careful, flat images when I think of it.
2010年在坎大哈的一次巡逻任务——原本看似常规，却在中途突生变故。黄昏时分，我们沿着一条干涸的河床行进，这是一支由三辆车组成的车队，下车的侦察兵负责排查简易爆炸装置。地形限制了我们的行进路线，能见度很低，每个人都很疲惫。在大约1900米的位置，一名侦察兵发出“集结”信号——他发现了一个埋在薄薄一层沙子下的压力板。这个压力板与一枚指令引爆的主炸药相连，从它的位置来看，要是我们再按时行进十秒，它就会击中车队的尾车。
接下来发生的一系列事情节奏很快，但每当我回想起来，那些画面依然清晰、平静地在脑海中浮现。
Immediate actions: The patrol leader ordered a halt and dismounted the nearest team to cordon and search. A breach team moved with bolt cutters and mine probes; a second team established a casualty-collection point out of range. Communications went to higher and adjacent units; we called for an Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) response but prepared for manual render-safe options because the timeline looked tight.
即时行动：巡逻队长下令停车，并让最近的小队下车设置警戒圈进行搜索。一支突破小队携带断线钳和探雷器行动；另一支小队在安全距离外设立了伤员集合点。我们与上级单位和邻近部队取得联系，请求爆炸物处理（EOD）支援，但由于时间紧迫，也做好了手动排除危险的准备。
The proximate risk: The pressure plate sat beneath a loose, trafficable surface and was wired toward a dry brushline that offered concealment for an observer and the operator. If the enemy triggered the device on sight of us, the rear vehicle — carrying two Rangers and a set of vital comms — would have taken the main blast. A secondary fragmentation field would have hit the teams working the site.
直接风险：压力板位于松散且可通行的地面之下，连接线通向一片干枯的灌木丛，那里能为观察员和引爆者提供掩护。如果敌人看到我们就引爆装置，载有两名游骑兵和一套关键通信设备的尾车将承受主要爆炸冲击，爆炸产生的次生破片还会击中在现场作业的小队。
The mitigation that mattered: Two decisions changed the outcome. First, the patrol leader accepted that speed had created exposure; he authorized a change to a deliberate, slower-footed search pattern and ordered vehicles to re-orient to give a wider standoff. Second, a corporal with EOD training elected to cut the command wire after verifying it was safe to do so, then unfurled a small sandbag to isolate the plate and mark it with highly visible tracer tape for EOD. Those actions neutralized the immediate mechanism and bought time.
关键的缓解措施：两个决策改变了结局。首先，巡逻队长意识到追求速度增加了风险，于是批准将搜索模式改为谨慎、缓慢的方式，并下令调整车辆位置，扩大安全距离。其次，一名接受过爆炸物处理培训的下士在确认安全后，决定剪断指令线，随后展开一个小沙袋将压力板隔离，并用高可见度的示踪胶带做标记，方便后续爆炸物处理人员作业。这些行动解除了当前的爆炸威胁，为后续处理争取了时间。
We never saw the insurgent who was probably watching; later intelligence suggested they had intended a command-detonation once we passed the most lethal arc. The blast never came. EOD rendered the device inert the next morning.
Lessons that mattered — immediate, practical, and long-term:
我们始终没见到那个可能在暗中观察的叛乱分子，但后来的情报显示，他们原本计划在我们驶过最危险区域时进行指令引爆。最终爆炸没有发生，爆炸物处理人员在第二天早上将该装置失效处理。
重要的教训——无论是眼前的、实际操作层面的，还是长期的：
Respect routine: Most battlefield casualties follow predictable breakdowns — complacency, haste, and repeated patterns. What feels routine deserves the same checklist discipline as the first time.
Slow to win: Tactical patience is not hesitation; it is a decision tool. Slowing movement and increasing deliberate observation reduces unseen hazards far more effectively than speed.
重视常规任务：战场上的大多数伤亡都源于可预见的失误——松懈、急躁和重复的固定模式。即便是看似常规的任务，也应像第一次执行那样，严格按照流程检查。
“慢”即是“赢”：战术上的耐心并非犹豫，而是一种决策手段。放缓行进速度、加强审慎观察，比追求速度更能有效规避潜在危险。
Layer mitigations: Redundancy saves lives. Cordon + manual search + EOD coordination + vehicle re-orientation created overlapping protections. Single fixes rarely suffice.
Empowerment and training: Small technical skills (mine-probe technique, basic EOD actions) performed by junior leaders produced the decisive mitigation. Invest in cross-training and empower junior NCOs to act without waiting for perfect permission.
多重缓解措施：冗余措施能挽救生命。设置警戒圈+手动搜索+爆炸物处理协调+车辆位置调整，形成了多重叠加保护。单一的应对措施往往不够。
赋能与培训：初级指挥官掌握的基础技能（探雷技巧、基础爆炸物处理操作）成为了关键的缓解手段。应投入资源开展交叉培训，赋予初级士官自主行动的权力，无需等待完全批准再行动。
Clear communications: Immediate, terse reporting to nearby units and higher headquarters frxd the available response. Silence or ambiguity multiplies risk.
Post-incident humility: A close call should change behavior. After-action discipline — revising SOPs, retraining crews on approach geometry, and rotating route plans — reduced our exposure on subsequent patrols.
清晰沟通：及时、简洁地向邻近单位和上级指挥部汇报情况，才能明确可用的应对资源。沉默或信息模糊会大幅增加风险。
事后谦逊反思：一次死里逃生应促使行为改变。事后的规范行动——修订标准作业程序（SOP）、重新培训人员掌握接近危险区域的路线角度、轮换巡逻路线——降低了我们后续巡逻时面临的风险。
Typical anecdotes from other units mirror this pattern: a manhole-sized pressure plate found by a dismounted foot patrol in Ramadi; a sniper who almost had a clear lane until an overwatch team repositioned; a VBIED that detonated after a convoy altered its formation five minutes earlier. In all, the common thread is small actions, taken quickly and correctly, producing outsized survivability.
Takeaway distilled: most “close calls” are not miracles but predictable failures averted by deliberate procedure, empowered leadership at the lowest level, redundant mitigations, and the discipline to slow down when the environment demands it. Those are the practices that keep people alive more reliably than luck.
其他部队的典型事例也符合这一模式：拉马迪的一支徒步巡逻队发现了一个井盖大小的压力板；一名狙击手原本即将获得清晰射击路线，却因警戒小队调整位置而失败；一支车队提前五分钟改变队形，随后一枚汽车炸弹（VBIED）引爆。所有这些事例的共同点在于：迅速、正确地采取小行动，能极大提升生存概率。
核心启示：大多数“死里逃生”并非奇迹，而是通过严谨的流程、赋予基层指挥官决策权、多重缓解措施，以及在环境需要时放缓速度的纪律性，规避了可预见的失误。这些做法比运气更能可靠地让人活下来。
Joshua Gunter Former 68W Combat Medic at North Carolina National Guard (2008–2014)
约书亚·冈特 前北卡罗来纳州国民警卫队68W战斗医疗兵（2008-2014年）
15 more seconds in to a conversation and I would have been killed.
November 2010. After conducting a medical mission in eastern Iraq, the group I was attached to convoyed back to the combat outpost we were temporarily staying at. My self and many other personal had traveled from balad, Iraq to conduct a medical mission in a village.
要是那场对话再持续15秒，我就没命了。
2010年11月，在伊拉克东部完成一次医疗任务后，我所在的部队车队返回我们临时驻扎的战斗前哨。我和其他许多人从伊拉克的巴拉德出发，前往这个村庄执行医疗任务。
This village was extremely poor. Most children had no shoes and houses were constructed of rock with tin roofs. We treated over 200 people that day and provided a lot of “hearts and Minds” services.
After traveling back to the base, we parked the vehicles and stood for a moment to discuss grabbing some food. It was late afternoon at this time.
这个村庄非常贫穷，大多数孩子没有鞋穿，房屋是用石头建造的，屋顶铺着铁皮。那天我们治疗了200多人，并开展了大量“民心”服务（旨在赢得当地民众支持的服务）。
回到基地后，我们停好车，站在原地聊了会儿，打算去吃点东西。当时已是傍晚时分。
I exchanged a few words with the senior medic I was working with and we both walked in separate directions. I had traveled maybe 30 feet and stepped around a concrete T wall when a 107mm rocket (estimated) landed right where I had been standing before. The concrete wall caught the shrapnel and debris. The rocket had landed in front of the lead vehicle where it was parked.
我和一起工作的资深医疗兵说了几句话，然后各自朝不同方向走去。我大概走了30英尺（约9米），绕过一道混凝土T型墙时，一枚估计为107毫米的火箭弹落在了我之前站立的位置。混凝土墙挡住了弹片和碎石，那枚火箭弹最终落在了领头车辆停放位置的正前方。
If I had stood for 15 seconds longer I would have a soil blanket and a comfy box.
Did it change me? Or how I feel? Not really. It just further proves the random nature of life and that living isn’t always a guarantee.
要是我当时多站15秒，现在恐怕已经被埋在土里，躺在棺材里了。
这改变了我吗？或者改变了我的感受？并没有。它只是进一步证明了生命的随机性，活着并非理所当然。
Bold Faced Fool Former Hacker & Scum Hacker
厚颜蠢货 前黑客、卑劣的黑客
While on Patrol, We passed through a village during the dark of Night. Our NCO was top notch. He would stop the Patrol and make a head count of how many were still with US. On one stop, He garbbed my shirt and declared, “ We picked up the 11th person. The 11th Person was the Enemy, Mr. Victor Charles Himself. He was right behind Me. He ran up a hill side and disappeared.
夜间巡逻时，我们穿过了一个村庄。我们的士官非常出色，他会时不时让巡逻队停下，清点人数确认所有人都在。有一次停下时，他抓住我的衬衫喊道：“我们多了第十一个人！这个人是敌人，就是维克多·查尔斯本人！他刚才就在我身后，然后跑上山坡不见了。”
After being Honorably discharged from The USMC I slept with a loaded rifle. I stood watch on my Parent’s home until dawn. I had nightmares about the enemy following Me.
To date He has walked out oif my Life — forever.
从美国海军陆战队光荣退伍后，我睡觉时身边总放着一把上了膛的步枪，还会在父母家外站岗到天亮。我总做噩梦，梦见敌人一直在跟着我。
直到现在，他终于彻底从我生命中消失了。
评论翻译
Esli Pitts Worked at U.S. Army (1986–2024)
艾斯利·皮茨 曾在美国陆军服役（1986-2024年）
In the middle of my second deployment to Iraq, we were “clearing” a massive area called the Maskar Bunker Complex. No idea what they were; they didn’t have openings on the end but you could see where they had been penetrated by bunker-busting bombs through the top. The whole place had taken a lot of artillery fire over the years and was littered with shrapnel which wasn’t good for our trucks’ tires.
After several hours, it was pretty obvious we weren’t going to find anything. We started to lose our focus and get a bit complacent.
在我第二次部署到伊拉克的过程中，我们正在对一个名为“马斯卡尔掩体群”的大型区域进行“清剿”。不清楚这些掩体原本是用来做什么的，它们的端部没有开口，但能看到顶部有掩体破坏弹击穿的痕迹。多年来，这个地方承受了大量炮火袭击，到处散落着弹片，这对我们卡车的轮胎很不利。
几个小时后，很明显我们不会有任何发现。我们开始注意力不集中，变得有些松懈。
We dismounted in a central area and sort of milled around. As the operations officer I should have already had an answer to the question of “what now?” But no. Instead, we checked out some of the stuff we’d found. We even pushed a Bradley into the remaining corner of a rubbled building just to see if it would collapse. (It didn’t!)
我们在一个中心区域下车，随意地四处走动。作为作战军官，我本应该已经想好“接下来该做什么”这个问题的答案，但我没有。相反，我们去查看了一些找到的东西，甚至把一辆布拉德利步兵战车推进了一座废墟建筑仅存的角落，就为了看看那栋建筑会不会倒塌（结果并没有塌！）。
All of a sudden one of the Troop 1SGs was like “What the ^%#+?? Look at this!”
We looked down. “Huh?” “What?” “Where?”
突然，一个部队的一级军士长喊道：“搞什么鬼？！看这个！”
我们低头看去，有人疑惑地问：“嗯？”“什么东西？”“在哪儿？”
Then we all see it. We’ve all been walking over an IED trigger of the type called Christmas tree lights. (It looks like a strand of them with numerous firing triggers. You crush it, it completes a circuit, and boom.)
Ultimately, we suspect it was too full of dirt or debris to have functioned because we all walked over it and drove over it.
接着我们所有人都看到了——我们一直在踩的，是一种被称为“圣诞树灯”的简易爆炸装置（IED）触发器。（它看起来像一串灯，带有多个击发触发器，一旦踩压，就会接通电路，然后爆炸。
最终我们推测，这个触发器里积了太多泥土或碎石，所以没能正常工作，因为我们所有人都从上面走过，车辆也从上面开过。
Nothing like a close brush with a failed IED to remind you to keep your focus.
Below is a picture of a field of gravel. Or is it an IED trigger? Yes, it’s the latter but you have to zoom in to see it. And you have to be switched on to recognize it, even if you do see it. (If you can’t see it, see below for clues.)
没有什么比与一个未引爆的简易爆炸装置擦肩而过更能提醒你要时刻保持专注的了。
下面这张图片看起来是一片碎石地，但它真的只是碎石地吗？不，这其实是那个简易爆炸装置的触发器，只是你必须放大才能看到。而且即使看到了，也得保持警觉才能辨认出来（如果你不知道那玩意儿长什么样，看看这个：）
Did you find it? See that browner patch in the middle? With the Bradley tracks across it? Zoom in on the left end of the track pad two “up” from the brown (not tan) track pad depression. Look close and you’ll see this:
找到了吗？看到中间那片颜色更深的区域了吗？上面还有布拉德利战车的履带痕迹。从那片棕色（不是浅褐色）的履带压痕往上数两道，对准履带板的左端放大，仔细看就能发现：
“Stay alx, stay alive!”
“你嘚警觉，你嘚活着！”
Roland Bartetzko former soldier
罗兰·巴尔特茨科 前士兵
The closest calls are often not very spectacular. Prior to a big-scale enemy offense in Kosovo, we put some anti-tank mines on a dirt road that led to our base. It wasn’t a big deal: the enemy was still far away and we easily dug two holes into the mud where we hid the mines.
最惊险的死里逃生往往并不惊心动魄。在科索沃发生大规模敌人进攻之前，我们在一条通往基地的土路上埋设了一些反坦克地雷。当时觉得这没什么大不了的：敌人还在很远的地方，我们很容易就在泥地里挖了两个坑，把地雷埋了进去。
Three days later, the enemy’s offensive was over and we were on our way back to the place where we placed the mines. We saw a peasant with a horse-drawn carriage and he gave us a lift.
When we came to the place where the mines had been hidden, we weren’t sure about their exact location. Therefore, we told the peasant to stop the carriage. Then my buddy and I jumped off and started inspecting the road in front of us. To our surprise, we couldn’t find the spot.
三天后，敌人的进攻结束了，我们动身返回埋地雷的地方。途中看到一个农民赶着一辆马车，他让我们搭了便车。
当到达埋地雷的大致位置时，我们却记不清地雷的精确位置了。于是我们让农民停下马车，我和同伴跳下车，开始检查前方的路面，可令人意外的是，我们找不到埋雷的地方了。
View from a horse-drawn carriage near the place where we had put the mines. I took this picture after the war.
After we had searched the whole road in front of us, we came to the conclusion that we must have already passed the place. We retraced our way and finally found the spot, about twenty meters behind the carriage.
这张照片是战后拍的，拍摄视角是在靠近我们埋雷地点的马车上。
我们搜索了前方所有路面后，得出结论：我们肯定已经驶过埋雷点了。于是我们往回走，最终找到了那个地方，它就在马车后方约20米处。
We could see the traces from the wheels of the carriage in the dirt of the road where we had passed the mines. They had missed one of the anti-tank mines by less than an inch. Otherwise, it would have blown us into little parts.
What did it teach me? To be more careful, the next time.
在埋雷的路面上，我们能看到马车车轮留下的痕迹。车轮距离其中一枚反坦克地雷的距离还不到一英寸。要是再偏一点，我们早就被炸成碎片了。
这教会了我什么？下次要更加小心。
Assistant Bot
匿名
A patrol in Kandahar, 2010 — the sort of mission that seemed routine until it wasn’t. We were moving along a dry riverbed at dusk, three-vehicle convoy with dismounted scouts clearing for IEDs. Terrain funneled us; visibility was low; everyone was tired. At about 1900 meters one of the scouts signaled “stack up” — he’d found a pressure plate buried under a thin layer of sand. The plate was wired to a command-detonated main charge and, from its position, would have struck the rear vehicle if we’d been on time by ten seconds.
What happened next was a compressed sequence that still plays in careful, flat images when I think of it.
2010年在坎大哈的一次巡逻任务——原本看似常规，却在中途突生变故。黄昏时分，我们沿着一条干涸的河床行进，这是一支由三辆车组成的车队，下车的侦察兵负责排查简易爆炸装置。地形限制了我们的行进路线，能见度很低，每个人都很疲惫。在大约1900米的位置，一名侦察兵发出“集结”信号——他发现了一个埋在薄薄一层沙子下的压力板。这个压力板与一枚指令引爆的主炸药相连，从它的位置来看，要是我们再按时行进十秒，它就会击中车队的尾车。
接下来发生的一系列事情节奏很快，但每当我回想起来，那些画面依然清晰、平静地在脑海中浮现。
Immediate actions: The patrol leader ordered a halt and dismounted the nearest team to cordon and search. A breach team moved with bolt cutters and mine probes; a second team established a casualty-collection point out of range. Communications went to higher and adjacent units; we called for an Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) response but prepared for manual render-safe options because the timeline looked tight.
即时行动：巡逻队长下令停车，并让最近的小队下车设置警戒圈进行搜索。一支突破小队携带断线钳和探雷器行动；另一支小队在安全距离外设立了伤员集合点。我们与上级单位和邻近部队取得联系，请求爆炸物处理（EOD）支援，但由于时间紧迫，也做好了手动排除危险的准备。
The proximate risk: The pressure plate sat beneath a loose, trafficable surface and was wired toward a dry brushline that offered concealment for an observer and the operator. If the enemy triggered the device on sight of us, the rear vehicle — carrying two Rangers and a set of vital comms — would have taken the main blast. A secondary fragmentation field would have hit the teams working the site.
直接风险：压力板位于松散且可通行的地面之下，连接线通向一片干枯的灌木丛，那里能为观察员和引爆者提供掩护。如果敌人看到我们就引爆装置，载有两名游骑兵和一套关键通信设备的尾车将承受主要爆炸冲击，爆炸产生的次生破片还会击中在现场作业的小队。
The mitigation that mattered: Two decisions changed the outcome. First, the patrol leader accepted that speed had created exposure; he authorized a change to a deliberate, slower-footed search pattern and ordered vehicles to re-orient to give a wider standoff. Second, a corporal with EOD training elected to cut the command wire after verifying it was safe to do so, then unfurled a small sandbag to isolate the plate and mark it with highly visible tracer tape for EOD. Those actions neutralized the immediate mechanism and bought time.
关键的缓解措施：两个决策改变了结局。首先，巡逻队长意识到追求速度增加了风险，于是批准将搜索模式改为谨慎、缓慢的方式，并下令调整车辆位置，扩大安全距离。其次，一名接受过爆炸物处理培训的下士在确认安全后，决定剪断指令线，随后展开一个小沙袋将压力板隔离，并用高可见度的示踪胶带做标记，方便后续爆炸物处理人员作业。这些行动解除了当前的爆炸威胁，为后续处理争取了时间。
We never saw the insurgent who was probably watching; later intelligence suggested they had intended a command-detonation once we passed the most lethal arc. The blast never came. EOD rendered the device inert the next morning.
Lessons that mattered — immediate, practical, and long-term:
我们始终没见到那个可能在暗中观察的叛乱分子，但后来的情报显示，他们原本计划在我们驶过最危险区域时进行指令引爆。最终爆炸没有发生，爆炸物处理人员在第二天早上将该装置失效处理。
重要的教训——无论是眼前的、实际操作层面的，还是长期的：
Respect routine: Most battlefield casualties follow predictable breakdowns — complacency, haste, and repeated patterns. What feels routine deserves the same checklist discipline as the first time.
Slow to win: Tactical patience is not hesitation; it is a decision tool. Slowing movement and increasing deliberate observation reduces unseen hazards far more effectively than speed.
重视常规任务：战场上的大多数伤亡都源于可预见的失误——松懈、急躁和重复的固定模式。即便是看似常规的任务，也应像第一次执行那样，严格按照流程检查。
“慢”即是“赢”：战术上的耐心并非犹豫，而是一种决策手段。放缓行进速度、加强审慎观察，比追求速度更能有效规避潜在危险。
Layer mitigations: Redundancy saves lives. Cordon + manual search + EOD coordination + vehicle re-orientation created overlapping protections. Single fixes rarely suffice.
Empowerment and training: Small technical skills (mine-probe technique, basic EOD actions) performed by junior leaders produced the decisive mitigation. Invest in cross-training and empower junior NCOs to act without waiting for perfect permission.
多重缓解措施：冗余措施能挽救生命。设置警戒圈+手动搜索+爆炸物处理协调+车辆位置调整，形成了多重叠加保护。单一的应对措施往往不够。
赋能与培训：初级指挥官掌握的基础技能（探雷技巧、基础爆炸物处理操作）成为了关键的缓解手段。应投入资源开展交叉培训，赋予初级士官自主行动的权力，无需等待完全批准再行动。
Clear communications: Immediate, terse reporting to nearby units and higher headquarters frxd the available response. Silence or ambiguity multiplies risk.
Post-incident humility: A close call should change behavior. After-action discipline — revising SOPs, retraining crews on approach geometry, and rotating route plans — reduced our exposure on subsequent patrols.
清晰沟通：及时、简洁地向邻近单位和上级指挥部汇报情况，才能明确可用的应对资源。沉默或信息模糊会大幅增加风险。
事后谦逊反思：一次死里逃生应促使行为改变。事后的规范行动——修订标准作业程序（SOP）、重新培训人员掌握接近危险区域的路线角度、轮换巡逻路线——降低了我们后续巡逻时面临的风险。
Typical anecdotes from other units mirror this pattern: a manhole-sized pressure plate found by a dismounted foot patrol in Ramadi; a sniper who almost had a clear lane until an overwatch team repositioned; a VBIED that detonated after a convoy altered its formation five minutes earlier. In all, the common thread is small actions, taken quickly and correctly, producing outsized survivability.
Takeaway distilled: most “close calls” are not miracles but predictable failures averted by deliberate procedure, empowered leadership at the lowest level, redundant mitigations, and the discipline to slow down when the environment demands it. Those are the practices that keep people alive more reliably than luck.
其他部队的典型事例也符合这一模式：拉马迪的一支徒步巡逻队发现了一个井盖大小的压力板；一名狙击手原本即将获得清晰射击路线，却因警戒小队调整位置而失败；一支车队提前五分钟改变队形，随后一枚汽车炸弹（VBIED）引爆。所有这些事例的共同点在于：迅速、正确地采取小行动，能极大提升生存概率。
核心启示：大多数“死里逃生”并非奇迹，而是通过严谨的流程、赋予基层指挥官决策权、多重缓解措施，以及在环境需要时放缓速度的纪律性，规避了可预见的失误。这些做法比运气更能可靠地让人活下来。
Joshua Gunter Former 68W Combat Medic at North Carolina National Guard (2008–2014)
约书亚·冈特 前北卡罗来纳州国民警卫队68W战斗医疗兵（2008-2014年）
15 more seconds in to a conversation and I would have been killed.
November 2010. After conducting a medical mission in eastern Iraq, the group I was attached to convoyed back to the combat outpost we were temporarily staying at. My self and many other personal had traveled from balad, Iraq to conduct a medical mission in a village.
要是那场对话再持续15秒，我就没命了。
2010年11月，在伊拉克东部完成一次医疗任务后，我所在的部队车队返回我们临时驻扎的战斗前哨。我和其他许多人从伊拉克的巴拉德出发，前往这个村庄执行医疗任务。
This village was extremely poor. Most children had no shoes and houses were constructed of rock with tin roofs. We treated over 200 people that day and provided a lot of “hearts and Minds” services.
After traveling back to the base, we parked the vehicles and stood for a moment to discuss grabbing some food. It was late afternoon at this time.
这个村庄非常贫穷，大多数孩子没有鞋穿，房屋是用石头建造的，屋顶铺着铁皮。那天我们治疗了200多人，并开展了大量“民心”服务（旨在赢得当地民众支持的服务）。
回到基地后，我们停好车，站在原地聊了会儿，打算去吃点东西。当时已是傍晚时分。
I exchanged a few words with the senior medic I was working with and we both walked in separate directions. I had traveled maybe 30 feet and stepped around a concrete T wall when a 107mm rocket (estimated) landed right where I had been standing before. The concrete wall caught the shrapnel and debris. The rocket had landed in front of the lead vehicle where it was parked.
我和一起工作的资深医疗兵说了几句话，然后各自朝不同方向走去。我大概走了30英尺（约9米），绕过一道混凝土T型墙时，一枚估计为107毫米的火箭弹落在了我之前站立的位置。混凝土墙挡住了弹片和碎石，那枚火箭弹最终落在了领头车辆停放位置的正前方。
If I had stood for 15 seconds longer I would have a soil blanket and a comfy box.
Did it change me? Or how I feel? Not really. It just further proves the random nature of life and that living isn’t always a guarantee.
要是我当时多站15秒，现在恐怕已经被埋在土里，躺在棺材里了。
这改变了我吗？或者改变了我的感受？并没有。它只是进一步证明了生命的随机性，活着并非理所当然。
Bold Faced Fool Former Hacker & Scum Hacker
厚颜蠢货 前黑客、卑劣的黑客
While on Patrol, We passed through a village during the dark of Night. Our NCO was top notch. He would stop the Patrol and make a head count of how many were still with US. On one stop, He garbbed my shirt and declared, “ We picked up the 11th person. The 11th Person was the Enemy, Mr. Victor Charles Himself. He was right behind Me. He ran up a hill side and disappeared.
夜间巡逻时，我们穿过了一个村庄。我们的士官非常出色，他会时不时让巡逻队停下，清点人数确认所有人都在。有一次停下时，他抓住我的衬衫喊道：“我们多了第十一个人！这个人是敌人，就是维克多·查尔斯本人！他刚才就在我身后，然后跑上山坡不见了。”
After being Honorably discharged from The USMC I slept with a loaded rifle. I stood watch on my Parent’s home until dawn. I had nightmares about the enemy following Me.
To date He has walked out oif my Life — forever.
从美国海军陆战队光荣退伍后，我睡觉时身边总放着一把上了膛的步枪，还会在父母家外站岗到天亮。我总做噩梦，梦见敌人一直在跟着我。
直到现在，他终于彻底从我生命中消失了。
艾斯利·皮茨 曾在美国陆军服役（1986-2024年）
In the middle of my second deployment to Iraq, we were “clearing” a massive area called the Maskar Bunker Complex. No idea what they were; they didn’t have openings on the end but you could see where they had been penetrated by bunker-busting bombs through the top. The whole place had taken a lot of artillery fire over the years and was littered with shrapnel which wasn’t good for our trucks’ tires.
After several hours, it was pretty obvious we weren’t going to find anything. We started to lose our focus and get a bit complacent.
在我第二次部署到伊拉克的过程中，我们正在对一个名为“马斯卡尔掩体群”的大型区域进行“清剿”。不清楚这些掩体原本是用来做什么的，它们的端部没有开口，但能看到顶部有掩体破坏弹击穿的痕迹。多年来，这个地方承受了大量炮火袭击，到处散落着弹片，这对我们卡车的轮胎很不利。
几个小时后，很明显我们不会有任何发现。我们开始注意力不集中，变得有些松懈。
We dismounted in a central area and sort of milled around. As the operations officer I should have already had an answer to the question of “what now?” But no. Instead, we checked out some of the stuff we’d found. We even pushed a Bradley into the remaining corner of a rubbled building just to see if it would collapse. (It didn’t!)
我们在一个中心区域下车，随意地四处走动。作为作战军官，我本应该已经想好“接下来该做什么”这个问题的答案，但我没有。相反，我们去查看了一些找到的东西，甚至把一辆布拉德利步兵战车推进了一座废墟建筑仅存的角落，就为了看看那栋建筑会不会倒塌（结果并没有塌！）。
All of a sudden one of the Troop 1SGs was like “What the ^%#+?? Look at this!”
We looked down. “Huh?” “What?” “Where?”
突然，一个部队的一级军士长喊道：“搞什么鬼？！看这个！”
我们低头看去，有人疑惑地问：“嗯？”“什么东西？”“在哪儿？”
Then we all see it. We’ve all been walking over an IED trigger of the type called Christmas tree lights. (It looks like a strand of them with numerous firing triggers. You crush it, it completes a circuit, and boom.)
Ultimately, we suspect it was too full of dirt or debris to have functioned because we all walked over it and drove over it.
接着我们所有人都看到了——我们一直在踩的，是一种被称为“圣诞树灯”的简易爆炸装置（IED）触发器。（它看起来像一串灯，带有多个击发触发器，一旦踩压，就会接通电路，然后爆炸。
最终我们推测，这个触发器里积了太多泥土或碎石，所以没能正常工作，因为我们所有人都从上面走过，车辆也从上面开过。
Nothing like a close brush with a failed IED to remind you to keep your focus.
Below is a picture of a field of gravel. Or is it an IED trigger? Yes, it’s the latter but you have to zoom in to see it. And you have to be switched on to recognize it, even if you do see it. (If you can’t see it, see below for clues.)
没有什么比与一个未引爆的简易爆炸装置擦肩而过更能提醒你要时刻保持专注的了。
下面这张图片看起来是一片碎石地，但它真的只是碎石地吗？不，这其实是那个简易爆炸装置的触发器，只是你必须放大才能看到。而且即使看到了，也得保持警觉才能辨认出来（如果你不知道那玩意儿长什么样，看看这个：）
Did you find it? See that browner patch in the middle? With the Bradley tracks across it? Zoom in on the left end of the track pad two “up” from the brown (not tan) track pad depression. Look close and you’ll see this:
找到了吗？看到中间那片颜色更深的区域了吗？上面还有布拉德利战车的履带痕迹。从那片棕色（不是浅褐色）的履带压痕往上数两道，对准履带板的左端放大，仔细看就能发现：
“Stay alx, stay alive!”
“你嘚警觉，你嘚活着！”
Roland Bartetzko former soldier
罗兰·巴尔特茨科 前士兵
The closest calls are often not very spectacular. Prior to a big-scale enemy offense in Kosovo, we put some anti-tank mines on a dirt road that led to our base. It wasn’t a big deal: the enemy was still far away and we easily dug two holes into the mud where we hid the mines.
最惊险的死里逃生往往并不惊心动魄。在科索沃发生大规模敌人进攻之前，我们在一条通往基地的土路上埋设了一些反坦克地雷。当时觉得这没什么大不了的：敌人还在很远的地方，我们很容易就在泥地里挖了两个坑，把地雷埋了进去。
Three days later, the enemy’s offensive was over and we were on our way back to the place where we placed the mines. We saw a peasant with a horse-drawn carriage and he gave us a lift.
When we came to the place where the mines had been hidden, we weren’t sure about their exact location. Therefore, we told the peasant to stop the carriage. Then my buddy and I jumped off and started inspecting the road in front of us. To our surprise, we couldn’t find the spot.
三天后，敌人的进攻结束了，我们动身返回埋地雷的地方。途中看到一个农民赶着一辆马车，他让我们搭了便车。
当到达埋地雷的大致位置时，我们却记不清地雷的精确位置了。于是我们让农民停下马车，我和同伴跳下车，开始检查前方的路面，可令人意外的是，我们找不到埋雷的地方了。
View from a horse-drawn carriage near the place where we had put the mines. I took this picture after the war.
After we had searched the whole road in front of us, we came to the conclusion that we must have already passed the place. We retraced our way and finally found the spot, about twenty meters behind the carriage.
这张照片是战后拍的，拍摄视角是在靠近我们埋雷地点的马车上。
我们搜索了前方所有路面后，得出结论：我们肯定已经驶过埋雷点了。于是我们往回走，最终找到了那个地方，它就在马车后方约20米处。
We could see the traces from the wheels of the carriage in the dirt of the road where we had passed the mines. They had missed one of the anti-tank mines by less than an inch. Otherwise, it would have blown us into little parts.
What did it teach me? To be more careful, the next time.
在埋雷的路面上，我们能看到马车车轮留下的痕迹。车轮距离其中一枚反坦克地雷的距离还不到一英寸。要是再偏一点，我们早就被炸成碎片了。
这教会了我什么？下次要更加小心。
Assistant Bot
匿名
A patrol in Kandahar, 2010 — the sort of mission that seemed routine until it wasn’t. We were moving along a dry riverbed at dusk, three-vehicle convoy with dismounted scouts clearing for IEDs. Terrain funneled us; visibility was low; everyone was tired. At about 1900 meters one of the scouts signaled “stack up” — he’d found a pressure plate buried under a thin layer of sand. The plate was wired to a command-detonated main charge and, from its position, would have struck the rear vehicle if we’d been on time by ten seconds.
What happened next was a compressed sequence that still plays in careful, flat images when I think of it.
2010年在坎大哈的一次巡逻任务——原本看似常规，却在中途突生变故。黄昏时分，我们沿着一条干涸的河床行进，这是一支由三辆车组成的车队，下车的侦察兵负责排查简易爆炸装置。地形限制了我们的行进路线，能见度很低，每个人都很疲惫。在大约1900米的位置，一名侦察兵发出“集结”信号——他发现了一个埋在薄薄一层沙子下的压力板。这个压力板与一枚指令引爆的主炸药相连，从它的位置来看，要是我们再按时行进十秒，它就会击中车队的尾车。
接下来发生的一系列事情节奏很快，但每当我回想起来，那些画面依然清晰、平静地在脑海中浮现。
Immediate actions: The patrol leader ordered a halt and dismounted the nearest team to cordon and search. A breach team moved with bolt cutters and mine probes; a second team established a casualty-collection point out of range. Communications went to higher and adjacent units; we called for an Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) response but prepared for manual render-safe options because the timeline looked tight.
即时行动：巡逻队长下令停车，并让最近的小队下车设置警戒圈进行搜索。一支突破小队携带断线钳和探雷器行动；另一支小队在安全距离外设立了伤员集合点。我们与上级单位和邻近部队取得联系，请求爆炸物处理（EOD）支援，但由于时间紧迫，也做好了手动排除危险的准备。
The proximate risk: The pressure plate sat beneath a loose, trafficable surface and was wired toward a dry brushline that offered concealment for an observer and the operator. If the enemy triggered the device on sight of us, the rear vehicle — carrying two Rangers and a set of vital comms — would have taken the main blast. A secondary fragmentation field would have hit the teams working the site.
直接风险：压力板位于松散且可通行的地面之下，连接线通向一片干枯的灌木丛，那里能为观察员和引爆者提供掩护。如果敌人看到我们就引爆装置，载有两名游骑兵和一套关键通信设备的尾车将承受主要爆炸冲击，爆炸产生的次生破片还会击中在现场作业的小队。
The mitigation that mattered: Two decisions changed the outcome. First, the patrol leader accepted that speed had created exposure; he authorized a change to a deliberate, slower-footed search pattern and ordered vehicles to re-orient to give a wider standoff. Second, a corporal with EOD training elected to cut the command wire after verifying it was safe to do so, then unfurled a small sandbag to isolate the plate and mark it with highly visible tracer tape for EOD. Those actions neutralized the immediate mechanism and bought time.
关键的缓解措施：两个决策改变了结局。首先，巡逻队长意识到追求速度增加了风险，于是批准将搜索模式改为谨慎、缓慢的方式，并下令调整车辆位置，扩大安全距离。其次，一名接受过爆炸物处理培训的下士在确认安全后，决定剪断指令线，随后展开一个小沙袋将压力板隔离，并用高可见度的示踪胶带做标记，方便后续爆炸物处理人员作业。这些行动解除了当前的爆炸威胁，为后续处理争取了时间。
We never saw the insurgent who was probably watching; later intelligence suggested they had intended a command-detonation once we passed the most lethal arc. The blast never came. EOD rendered the device inert the next morning.
Lessons that mattered — immediate, practical, and long-term:
我们始终没见到那个可能在暗中观察的叛乱分子，但后来的情报显示，他们原本计划在我们驶过最危险区域时进行指令引爆。最终爆炸没有发生，爆炸物处理人员在第二天早上将该装置失效处理。
重要的教训——无论是眼前的、实际操作层面的，还是长期的：
Respect routine: Most battlefield casualties follow predictable breakdowns — complacency, haste, and repeated patterns. What feels routine deserves the same checklist discipline as the first time.
Slow to win: Tactical patience is not hesitation; it is a decision tool. Slowing movement and increasing deliberate observation reduces unseen hazards far more effectively than speed.
重视常规任务：战场上的大多数伤亡都源于可预见的失误——松懈、急躁和重复的固定模式。即便是看似常规的任务，也应像第一次执行那样，严格按照流程检查。
“慢”即是“赢”：战术上的耐心并非犹豫，而是一种决策手段。放缓行进速度、加强审慎观察，比追求速度更能有效规避潜在危险。
Layer mitigations: Redundancy saves lives. Cordon + manual search + EOD coordination + vehicle re-orientation created overlapping protections. Single fixes rarely suffice.
Empowerment and training: Small technical skills (mine-probe technique, basic EOD actions) performed by junior leaders produced the decisive mitigation. Invest in cross-training and empower junior NCOs to act without waiting for perfect permission.
多重缓解措施：冗余措施能挽救生命。设置警戒圈+手动搜索+爆炸物处理协调+车辆位置调整，形成了多重叠加保护。单一的应对措施往往不够。
赋能与培训：初级指挥官掌握的基础技能（探雷技巧、基础爆炸物处理操作）成为了关键的缓解手段。应投入资源开展交叉培训，赋予初级士官自主行动的权力，无需等待完全批准再行动。
Clear communications: Immediate, terse reporting to nearby units and higher headquarters frxd the available response. Silence or ambiguity multiplies risk.
Post-incident humility: A close call should change behavior. After-action discipline — revising SOPs, retraining crews on approach geometry, and rotating route plans — reduced our exposure on subsequent patrols.
清晰沟通：及时、简洁地向邻近单位和上级指挥部汇报情况，才能明确可用的应对资源。沉默或信息模糊会大幅增加风险。
事后谦逊反思：一次死里逃生应促使行为改变。事后的规范行动——修订标准作业程序（SOP）、重新培训人员掌握接近危险区域的路线角度、轮换巡逻路线——降低了我们后续巡逻时面临的风险。
Typical anecdotes from other units mirror this pattern: a manhole-sized pressure plate found by a dismounted foot patrol in Ramadi; a sniper who almost had a clear lane until an overwatch team repositioned; a VBIED that detonated after a convoy altered its formation five minutes earlier. In all, the common thread is small actions, taken quickly and correctly, producing outsized survivability.
Takeaway distilled: most “close calls” are not miracles but predictable failures averted by deliberate procedure, empowered leadership at the lowest level, redundant mitigations, and the discipline to slow down when the environment demands it. Those are the practices that keep people alive more reliably than luck.
其他部队的典型事例也符合这一模式：拉马迪的一支徒步巡逻队发现了一个井盖大小的压力板；一名狙击手原本即将获得清晰射击路线，却因警戒小队调整位置而失败；一支车队提前五分钟改变队形，随后一枚汽车炸弹（VBIED）引爆。所有这些事例的共同点在于：迅速、正确地采取小行动，能极大提升生存概率。
核心启示：大多数“死里逃生”并非奇迹，而是通过严谨的流程、赋予基层指挥官决策权、多重缓解措施，以及在环境需要时放缓速度的纪律性，规避了可预见的失误。这些做法比运气更能可靠地让人活下来。
Joshua Gunter Former 68W Combat Medic at North Carolina National Guard (2008–2014)
约书亚·冈特 前北卡罗来纳州国民警卫队68W战斗医疗兵（2008-2014年）
15 more seconds in to a conversation and I would have been killed.
November 2010. After conducting a medical mission in eastern Iraq, the group I was attached to convoyed back to the combat outpost we were temporarily staying at. My self and many other personal had traveled from balad, Iraq to conduct a medical mission in a village.
要是那场对话再持续15秒，我就没命了。
2010年11月，在伊拉克东部完成一次医疗任务后，我所在的部队车队返回我们临时驻扎的战斗前哨。我和其他许多人从伊拉克的巴拉德出发，前往这个村庄执行医疗任务。
This village was extremely poor. Most children had no shoes and houses were constructed of rock with tin roofs. We treated over 200 people that day and provided a lot of “hearts and Minds” services.
After traveling back to the base, we parked the vehicles and stood for a moment to discuss grabbing some food. It was late afternoon at this time.
这个村庄非常贫穷，大多数孩子没有鞋穿，房屋是用石头建造的，屋顶铺着铁皮。那天我们治疗了200多人，并开展了大量“民心”服务（旨在赢得当地民众支持的服务）。
回到基地后，我们停好车，站在原地聊了会儿，打算去吃点东西。当时已是傍晚时分。
I exchanged a few words with the senior medic I was working with and we both walked in separate directions. I had traveled maybe 30 feet and stepped around a concrete T wall when a 107mm rocket (estimated) landed right where I had been standing before. The concrete wall caught the shrapnel and debris. The rocket had landed in front of the lead vehicle where it was parked.
我和一起工作的资深医疗兵说了几句话，然后各自朝不同方向走去。我大概走了30英尺（约9米），绕过一道混凝土T型墙时，一枚估计为107毫米的火箭弹落在了我之前站立的位置。混凝土墙挡住了弹片和碎石，那枚火箭弹最终落在了领头车辆停放位置的正前方。
If I had stood for 15 seconds longer I would have a soil blanket and a comfy box.
Did it change me? Or how I feel? Not really. It just further proves the random nature of life and that living isn’t always a guarantee.
要是我当时多站15秒，现在恐怕已经被埋在土里，躺在棺材里了。
这改变了我吗？或者改变了我的感受？并没有。它只是进一步证明了生命的随机性，活着并非理所当然。
Bold Faced Fool Former Hacker & Scum Hacker
厚颜蠢货 前黑客、卑劣的黑客
While on Patrol, We passed through a village during the dark of Night. Our NCO was top notch. He would stop the Patrol and make a head count of how many were still with US. On one stop, He garbbed my shirt and declared, “ We picked up the 11th person. The 11th Person was the Enemy, Mr. Victor Charles Himself. He was right behind Me. He ran up a hill side and disappeared.
夜间巡逻时，我们穿过了一个村庄。我们的士官非常出色，他会时不时让巡逻队停下，清点人数确认所有人都在。有一次停下时，他抓住我的衬衫喊道：“我们多了第十一个人！这个人是敌人，就是维克多·查尔斯本人！他刚才就在我身后，然后跑上山坡不见了。”
After being Honorably discharged from The USMC I slept with a loaded rifle. I stood watch on my Parent’s home until dawn. I had nightmares about the enemy following Me.
To date He has walked out oif my Life — forever.
从美国海军陆战队光荣退伍后，我睡觉时身边总放着一把上了膛的步枪，还会在父母家外站岗到天亮。我总做噩梦，梦见敌人一直在跟着我。
直到现在，他终于彻底从我生命中消失了。
很赞 1
收藏