F-47：目前我们所知的全部信息
正文翻译
评论翻译
@ricoma6037
Perhaps we could just tell the enemies that our stealth fighters have everyone surrounded. Don't bother looking for them as we have actually mastered invisibility. It would be a huge budget saver!
要不我们直接跟敌人说，我们的隐形战机已经把他们包了饺子？别白费力气找了，我们是真的能隐身！这样能省好多钱啊！
@DaDaLFG
Lockheed not getting the contract might be a concern
洛克希德拿不到这份合同，或许会成为一个隐患
@barrettbaker8721
The other thing to remember is that this will also be working alongside every other American fighter. The F-15 and F-16 will still be in service for I'd guess 2 more decades. While the F-47 and F-35 fly ahead dealing with enemy stealth fighters and destroying enemy SAMs, the older fighters will be behind them literally just as missile trucks that can be coordinated by the F-47. On top of their fleets of loyal wingmen. Truly crazy.
还有一点需要记住：这款战机（F-47）届时将与美军所有其他战斗机协同作战。我认为F-15和F-16大概还会服役20年。
当F-47和F-35在前方负责处理敌方隐形战机并摧毁敌方防空导弹系统时，这些老式战机将位于后方，实际上充当由F-47协调指挥的‘导弹卡车’。
再加上它们各自率领的‘忠诚僚机’机队，这画面简直太疯狂了。
@chir0pter
if the NGAD started flying demonstrators 5-10 years ago then that puts the J-50 and J-36 5-10 years behind.
如果NGAD项目在5到10年前就开始进行技术验证机试飞了，那么这就意味着歼-50和歼-36要落后5到10年。
@scottmartin9041
Hopefully the doors don't fall of the F 47 if Boeing builds it .
要是由波音公司来制造 F-47 战机，但愿它的舱门可别掉下来。
@Oraceon
Thankfully, the military aviation team at Boeing is completely separate from their civilian aviation counterparts. Different more rigorous training and top level clearance
谢天谢地，波音公司的军用航空团队与其民用航空的同行完全是分开的。他们有着不同的、更严格的培训体系，以及最高级别的安全许可。
@Nick-bh5bk
I have large concerns about Boeing given it's recent performance. Having said that, we cannot afford to whittle down the number of defense contractors even more.
鉴于波音最近的表现，我对其有很深的忧虑。话虽如此，我们也不能承担将国防承包商数量进一步削减的代价。
@NomadicDreamer3949
I don't think they would dare to cut corners to maximize the profits on F-47 like they did with their flying coffins Boing 730 series!
我不认为他们会像对待他们那些"飞行棺材"波音 730 系列那样，在 F-47 上为了追求利润而偷工减料！
@Jacknthebox-n8l
The level of risk with the joint strike fighter (F-35) had congress pulling their hair out.
Cost overruns, delays, and many
claiming it’s the most expensive
failure to date… and it’s proven
to be everything the designers
said it would be.
联合攻击战斗机（F-35）项目的风险等级之高，曾让美国国会头疼不已。
超支、延期的问题层出不穷，许多人甚至称它是迄今为止耗资最为高昂的失败项目…… 然而最终事实证明，这款战机的性能完全达到了设计者的预期。
@acidkhmer
Zero faith in boeing, their planes, theirs space shuttle, capsule all have deadly issue and 1000more expensive for nothing
对波音零信任。他们的飞机、航天飞机、太空舱全都有致命问题，而且贵了1000倍,性价比极低.
@rickbase833
So far there are a lot of snide remarks about Boeing. I've worked in the US defense industry since the mid 90s and can verify that Boeing defense is both a large contractor and a formidable competitor to all the biggies like NG and LM. In fact, Boeing was the prime that competed with my company, NG, for the Sentinel ICBM and the B-21 programs. Boeing defense is a major player and a competent one.
目前，关于波音的冷嘲热讽确实不少。但我自上世纪90年代中期起就一直在美国国防工业界工作，我可以证实：
波音防务部门不仅是一家大型承包商，更是诺斯罗普·格鲁曼和洛克希德·马丁等所有巨头的强劲对手。
事实上，波音曾作为主承包商，与我所在的诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司争夺‘哨兵’洲际弹道导弹以及B-21轰炸机项目。波音防务是当之无愧的行业主力军，其专业实力毋庸置疑。
@594qr
Just commercial planes they cant build right anymore eh?
你的意思是，唯独商用飞机他们再也无法正确制造了？
@AnonymousVenator
@594qr Different teams, unless you think the people who make 747s also makes F-15s?
@594qr
那是不同的团队好吗！除非你以为造747客机的那帮人，同时也是在造F-15战斗机
@lqr824
People forget that around 1970, there were crashes with fatalities literally monthly just within the US and far more abroad. Read Wikipedia and start at Jan 1 of any year before 1975 or so, drink a shot for each fatal air crash, and you will not make it to the end of the year before you pass out. And for every fatal accident there were multiple accidents without fatalities. Now we travel 10x more passenger-miles and there have only been 4 crashes with fatalities in the last quarter-century other than 9/11. Of those 4, 1 was Boeing, 1 Airbus, 1 Bombardier, 1 British Aerospace. Even respected aircraft experts like Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles say with disdain that if Mr. Boeing himself was around he'd be shocked to see the state of Boeing's safety record--and they're right but not in the way they think. Mr. Boeing would call you a liar when you told him how phenomenally safe air travel is today. It's literally thousands of times safer than the safest car on the highways, for instance, and safer than trains.
人们都忘了，在 1970 年前后，单是美国境内每月就会发生数起致命空难，海外的此类事故更是要多得多。
你不妨去维基百科上查证一下，随便挑一个 1975 年之前的年份，从 1 月 1 日开始，每看到一起致命空难就喝一杯酒，那你绝对撑不到年末就会醉得不省人事。
而且，每发生一起致命空难，就会伴随多起人员死亡的飞行事故。
如今，航空客运周转量已经增长了十倍，可在过去的四分之一个世纪里，除了“911” 事件之外，全球范围内仅发生了 4 起致命空难。
这 4 起事故涉及的机型，分别出自波音、空客、庞巴迪和英国宇航这四家公司。
就连《格雷格的飞机与汽车》这类业内颇具权威性的平台，也都曾直言不讳地评价道：
倘若波音创始人尚在人世，看到如今波音的安全记录，定会深感震惊。他们说得没错，只是他们的解读角度，和事实本身并不一样。
现在的航空旅行比公路上最安全的汽车还要安全成千上万倍，也比火车更安全。
@mikeanderson9266
USA needs more focus on drones imho.
我认为美国需要更多关注无人机。
@theoneandonlyCameraMan
I just hope boeing doesn't builds their fighter jets like how they build their commercial airliners... wouldn't want the F-47 to fall apart like lego while cruising at mach 2 now would we ?
我只希望波音公司造战斗机时，别再沿用造民用客机那套路子
我可不想看到 F-47 在 2 马赫巡航的状态下，像乐高积木一样散架，对吧？
@ElPolloDiabloCH
At least the F-47 wont have any doors. So there's that.
至少 F-47 不会配备任何舱门。
这么看倒也算是个优势。
@Gilgwathir
US military: "hey, we just built a absolute technical monster that is so expensive we have to fleece our trading partners so we can actually pay for it. we call it tht F-35. Let's do it again! Gonna be great!"
美国军方：‘嘿，我们刚造出了一头绝对的技术怪兽，贵到我们必须薅盟友的羊毛才能付得起账单。我们管它叫F-35。咱们再这么干一次吧！肯定会很棒的！
@darkprometheus
the issue with the F-35 was there were to many people asking for different variations of the same thing. So the marine VTOL is different than the Air forces and so on. Some of them so much where even the airfrx isn't the same so a Marine one cannot be swapped with an Air Force one. They essentially created 2-3 versions of the F-35 that are not compatible with each other.
F-35的问题在于，有太多人要求对同一个东西做出不同的变体。所以，海军陆战队的垂直起降型和空军的版本就不一样，诸如此类。
其中一些差异非常大，甚至连机身结构都不相同，导致海军陆战队的飞机根本无法与空军通用。他们实际上制造了2到3种无法互相兼容的F-35版本。
@LiveFastRaceHard
I live in the North East & love aviation. Im almost certain I've head one flying over late at night a year or so back. Never heard any jet ever sound anything like it. Clear night's this happened 3 times, it sounded like the most insane low audible rolling thunder in the upper atmosphere that lasted for a good 3 minutes, you could tell it was going from horizon to horizon too.
我住在东北部，而且超爱航空。大约一年前的一个深夜，我几乎敢肯定我听到有架飞机从头顶飞过。
我从没听过任何喷气式飞机发出过这种声音。那是在晴朗的夜晚发生的，一共出现过三次。
那声音听起来就像是高层大气中传来的、疯狂的低沉轰鸣声，像滚动的雷声一样，持续了足足有三分钟。而且你能感觉到它是在从地平线的一端飞向另一端。
@Cezium29
It's crazy how 30 years later, we actually have fighter aircraft that look like alien spacecraft in the movie 'Independence Day'.
时隔三十年，我们竟然真的造出了外形酷似电影《独立日》里外星飞船的战斗机，这简直太不可思议了
@wayneelliott5392
The drones would have to have the same combat radius as the f-47, would have to keep up with it and would have to be the same or better level of stealth ++ or whatever they want to call it. Otherwise the mission would be restricted to only what the drones could manage
这些无人机必须具备与 F-47 相当的作战半径，必须能够跟上 F-47 的飞行节奏，还得拥有同等乃至更优的隐身性能 ，不管军方将这种性能等级称作什么。
否则，作战任务的执行范围将只能局限于无人机的能力极限之内。
@Ayouguys
Surprised he’s not calling it the “big beautiful fighter jet” or that he hasn’t tweeted out the classified blueprint on how it’s built.
我倒是挺意外，特朗普怎么没管它叫‘大而美战斗机’，也没见他把那张绝密的设计蓝图发到推特上。
@ToughAncientSpark
Drumpf has to put his name on everything. It's a wonder it wasn't called the F-Drumpf!
特朗普这人就爱凡事都冠上自己的名号。
真稀奇，这战机居然没被命名成 “F - 特朗普”！
@johnnysparkleface3096
Much was made of it's stealth, but the assisting drones had better be as stealthy.
外界对它的隐身性能大肆吹捧，但配套的僚机最好也能具备同等的隐身水准。
@anthonyharry6678
How is stealth preserved if drones aren't equally stealth capable?
如果无人机不具备同等隐身能力，隐身性如何得以保持？
@vwager
Make some of those drones refueling tankers, and they really extend their range. I could see jets with limited weapons taking a few fuel drones to shuttle them from the Continental US bases to Guam.
将其中一部分无人机可以改装为无人加油机，战机的航程便能得到大幅拓展。
不难想见，那些挂载武器有限的战斗机，可借助数架无人加油机的保障，从美国本土直接飞至关岛。
@stephenwalton9646
The F-22is primarily a BVR platform. Yes, it’s a great aerobatic mount but if properly deployed, the opposition will never see what hit them. The 22 then drops back and acts as a networked AWACS coordinate fifth gen assets thus becoming a force multiplier. Enter the latest iteration of the F-15 as a missile truck. A friend is one of three pilots to fly the YF-22 and the YF-23. There were some flaws in each but there were some configuration problems with the 23. Other than that, the programs were priced differently. The 22 was over a billion cheaper, initially.
F-22主要是一个超视距作战平台。没错，它的气动性能极佳，若部署得当，对手甚至永远不会看到究竟是什么东西击中了他们。
一击之后，F-22 便会后撤，充当网络化的空中预警与指挥平台，协调所有五代机作战资源，进而成为战力倍增器。
这时，最新改型的F-15（作为导弹卡车）就能派上用场了。
我有一位朋友，是全球仅有的三位同时驾驶过 YF-22 和 YF-23 两款原型机的飞行员之一。
两款机型其实都存在一些缺陷，但 YF-23 的问题主要出在构型设计上。
除此之外，两个项目的造价也存在差异。
F-22 的造价要比 YF-23 低得多
@RatedRTarzan
Isn't it strange we all live on the same planet and are fighting each other
我们明明同处一颗星球，却要彼此争斗不休，这难道不荒谬吗？
@tygarner7731
operational by 2028? I have no doubt that it’s full operational now. The F117 1st flight was in 81’ entered service in 83’ and wasn’t publicly acknowledged until 88’ where its production phase was in 90’ and in Desert Storm in 91’. If there is one thing I know, the military likes to stick to its processes and time lines. Much like the full acknowledgement of the F117, it wasn’t acknowledged for 7 years after its first flight l, “that we know of” F35 is what? 19 years old by now. Of course something has been in development within that 19 years time frx.
2028 年才具备全面作战能力？我绝不相信它现在还没形成完全作战能力。
F-117 隐身战机于 1981 年首飞，1983 年正式服役，却直到 1988 年才被官方公开承认；其量产阶段始于 1990 年，随后便参与了 1991 年的 “沙漠风暴” 行动。
我唯一敢肯定的是，军方向来习惯于严格遵循既定流程与时间节点。
就像 F-117 的公开历程那样 ——据我们所知，它在首飞 7 年后才被官方承认；如今的 F-35 呢？算下来也已经诞生 19 年了。
显然，在这 19 年的时间跨度里，某些新装备的研发工作必然早已悄然启动。
@mattwiper
One things for certain in will go well over budget for multiple reasons.
有一点是可以肯定的：它会因为种种原因，出现严重超支的情况。
@derekjs515
Why trust Boeing with this contract when Lockheed has proven itself to deliver? When Boeing has done the exact opposite.
洛克希德早已证明自己具备履约能力，为何还要把这份合同交给波音？
毕竟波音的表现，恰恰与此截然相反。
@henryknox1186
This plane has the same limitation as all other planes. The pilot, remove the pilot and you can make a plane that is really scary.
这款战机与其他所有战机一样，存在着相同的短板。
这个短板就是飞行员。一旦去掉飞行员，你就能造出一款真正令人胆寒的战机。
@crystalroche2168
Pretty sure the F35 isn't even close to being obsolete. By the time the F47 (eye roll) is up and running, it might be obsolete via drone tech
我很确定F-35离过时还远着呢。等到那个F-47（翻个白眼）真正上线运行的时候，说不定无人机技术已经发展到让有人战机彻底过时了
@actionhero5438
Boeing's F47 stealth aircraft will be impossible to locate in the skies. Sure, because it will be lying crashed on the ground
波音公司的 F-47 隐身战机将在空中难觅踪迹。
当然了，毕竟它只会坠毁在地面上，静静躺着。
@wskinn
Considering how much trouble the US has feeding the F-35's technological support hunger, the F-47 feels..... ambitious.
考虑到美国为满足 F-35 对技术保障的庞大需求已经麻烦不断
F-47 这个项目给人的感觉…… 实在是有些好高骛远。
@Ecosystem8
The U.S needs to build a space military
美国需要建立太空军事力量
@FANTOllVll
I think other countries capabilities in this sector were vastly inflated in the video. China hasn’t even developed a 5th gen fighter that’s seen mass production. The Russian 5th gen has like 10 planes total. Just because Chinese planes are tailless it doesn’t mean automatic 6th gen. EU being mentioned is a joke on its own.
我认为视频中对其他国家在该领域的实力，存在严重夸大的成分。
中国甚至还没研发出一款能大规模生产的五代机。俄罗斯的五代机总数也就十架左右。
不能仅仅因为中国的飞机没有尾翼，就说它就是六代机。至于欧盟吗，那本身就是一个笑话。
@Coupe-sy9nk
The only video's ive seen of this jet are from foreign youtube channels, they are covering American aircraft more than Americans
我看到的关于这款战机的视频，全都来自国外的油管频道
这些频道对美国战机的报道力度，甚至比美国本土媒体还要大
@robertwillett4122
Why does it seem like your ragging on the USAF. Have they not been the leader since the beginning of flight.
博主怎么好像一直在吐槽美国空军。
自人类飞行时代开启以来，他们不就一直是领跑者吗？
@brianvandevelde9638
Ps getting closer than 4000 km with a carrier can be tricky the DF 26 hypersonic rocket from China is made for this... don´t know how effective it will be?
航母想要抵近至 4000 公里范围以内，可不是一件容易的事
因为中国专门研发了东风-26高超音速导弹来对付这种情况……只是不知道它的实际效果究竟如何？
@johncouch9062
I doubt Boeing could build a paper airplane that flies safely by 2028
我怀疑波音公司到 2028 年，连一架能安全飞行的纸飞机都造不出来。
@Taco_God
What's the point of flying a jet with no tails to remain stealthy if all the drones around it have tails?
如果战机周边的无人机都带有尾翼，那驾驶一架无尾战机来实现隐身又有什么意义呢？
@Martian74
The stealth planes are all so expensive to maintain. Every time they fly the skin needs to be inspected for any defects, hitting an insect is bad, hitting a bird is terrible. This new experimental engine sounds like a nightmare to maintain. They may be technically able to make it do the things he spoke about, but each flight may need a week of maintenance before the plane can fly again. The B2 and F22 have shown how much maintenance these stealth planes need. I think drones are cheaper and seem to be the way of the future. $300 million each is just too expensive, and that number could become much worse.
隐身战机的维护成本全都高得离谱。
每次飞行过后，机身蒙皮都要全面检查有无缺陷。撞上飞虫已是不小的麻烦，若是撞上飞鸟，后果更是不堪设想。
这款全新的实验性发动机，听着就是维护人员的噩梦。
技术层面上，他们或许确实能让这款战机实现他口中所说的那些性能，但每次飞行结束后，战机可能都需要整整一周的维护才能再次升空。
B-2 和 F-22 的先例，早已印证了这类隐身战机的维护需求有多惊人。
我认为无人机的成本更低，而且俨然已是未来的发展趋势。
每架 3 亿美元的造价实在过于高昂，而且这个数字还有可能会进一步攀升。
@LaurenMiddleton28
It's modeled after the Chinese J 50.. but unfortunately the Chinese have a 5 year head start.. In head to head simulations the Chinese J 50 took out 6 F22's and 7 F35's. In under 4 minutes.
这款战机是仿照中国的歼 - 50 设计的…… 但遗憾的是，中国方面已经领先了 5 年时间。
在一对一的模拟对抗中，中国的歼 - 50 在短短 4 分钟内就击落了 6 架 F-22 和 7 架 F-35。
@aquilesca5tr0
There is no aircraft called j50
目前并不存在一款名为歼 - 50 的战机。
@_Shinasu
I guess the best airfrx would be a cross between the F22 and the F15, it does always make me laugh when they show vids of the fighter with drone swarms, either the fighter is going ridiculously slow for those drones, or those drones are not going to last very long with the very limited distance they will be able to travel. Unless they have made drone engines the best engines in the world
我认为最优的机身设计，应该是融合 F-22 与 F-15 两者的优势而成。
每次看到那些战机伴随无人机蜂群协同作战的视频，我总会忍不住发笑。
要么就是战机为了配合无人机，飞得慢得离谱。
要么就是这些无人机的航程极为有限，根本无法长时间续航。
除非他们已经把无人机的发动机，做成了全球顶尖的水平。
@zachr207
Let me guess, corruption is why Boeing won the contract over Lockheed Martin?
让我猜猜，波音之所以能赢过洛克希德·马丁拿到合同，是因为腐败吧？
@afailable
Trusting Boeing to accomplish this is crazy... Forcing the best companies in the industry to collaborate would be the best option, but staking it all on Boeing? Crazy
指望波音来完成这项任务，简直是疯了
让业内顶尖企业联手合作才是最佳方案，可要是把所有筹码都押在波音身上？这纯属疯癫之举。
Perhaps we could just tell the enemies that our stealth fighters have everyone surrounded. Don't bother looking for them as we have actually mastered invisibility. It would be a huge budget saver!
要不我们直接跟敌人说，我们的隐形战机已经把他们包了饺子？别白费力气找了，我们是真的能隐身！这样能省好多钱啊！
@DaDaLFG
Lockheed not getting the contract might be a concern
洛克希德拿不到这份合同，或许会成为一个隐患
@barrettbaker8721
The other thing to remember is that this will also be working alongside every other American fighter. The F-15 and F-16 will still be in service for I'd guess 2 more decades. While the F-47 and F-35 fly ahead dealing with enemy stealth fighters and destroying enemy SAMs, the older fighters will be behind them literally just as missile trucks that can be coordinated by the F-47. On top of their fleets of loyal wingmen. Truly crazy.
还有一点需要记住：这款战机（F-47）届时将与美军所有其他战斗机协同作战。我认为F-15和F-16大概还会服役20年。
当F-47和F-35在前方负责处理敌方隐形战机并摧毁敌方防空导弹系统时，这些老式战机将位于后方，实际上充当由F-47协调指挥的‘导弹卡车’。
再加上它们各自率领的‘忠诚僚机’机队，这画面简直太疯狂了。
@chir0pter
if the NGAD started flying demonstrators 5-10 years ago then that puts the J-50 and J-36 5-10 years behind.
如果NGAD项目在5到10年前就开始进行技术验证机试飞了，那么这就意味着歼-50和歼-36要落后5到10年。
@scottmartin9041
Hopefully the doors don't fall of the F 47 if Boeing builds it .
要是由波音公司来制造 F-47 战机，但愿它的舱门可别掉下来。
@Oraceon
Thankfully, the military aviation team at Boeing is completely separate from their civilian aviation counterparts. Different more rigorous training and top level clearance
谢天谢地，波音公司的军用航空团队与其民用航空的同行完全是分开的。他们有着不同的、更严格的培训体系，以及最高级别的安全许可。
@Nick-bh5bk
I have large concerns about Boeing given it's recent performance. Having said that, we cannot afford to whittle down the number of defense contractors even more.
鉴于波音最近的表现，我对其有很深的忧虑。话虽如此，我们也不能承担将国防承包商数量进一步削减的代价。
@NomadicDreamer3949
I don't think they would dare to cut corners to maximize the profits on F-47 like they did with their flying coffins Boing 730 series!
我不认为他们会像对待他们那些"飞行棺材"波音 730 系列那样，在 F-47 上为了追求利润而偷工减料！
@Jacknthebox-n8l
The level of risk with the joint strike fighter (F-35) had congress pulling their hair out.
Cost overruns, delays, and many
claiming it’s the most expensive
failure to date… and it’s proven
to be everything the designers
said it would be.
联合攻击战斗机（F-35）项目的风险等级之高，曾让美国国会头疼不已。
超支、延期的问题层出不穷，许多人甚至称它是迄今为止耗资最为高昂的失败项目…… 然而最终事实证明，这款战机的性能完全达到了设计者的预期。
@acidkhmer
Zero faith in boeing, their planes, theirs space shuttle, capsule all have deadly issue and 1000more expensive for nothing
对波音零信任。他们的飞机、航天飞机、太空舱全都有致命问题，而且贵了1000倍,性价比极低.
@rickbase833
So far there are a lot of snide remarks about Boeing. I've worked in the US defense industry since the mid 90s and can verify that Boeing defense is both a large contractor and a formidable competitor to all the biggies like NG and LM. In fact, Boeing was the prime that competed with my company, NG, for the Sentinel ICBM and the B-21 programs. Boeing defense is a major player and a competent one.
目前，关于波音的冷嘲热讽确实不少。但我自上世纪90年代中期起就一直在美国国防工业界工作，我可以证实：
波音防务部门不仅是一家大型承包商，更是诺斯罗普·格鲁曼和洛克希德·马丁等所有巨头的强劲对手。
事实上，波音曾作为主承包商，与我所在的诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司争夺‘哨兵’洲际弹道导弹以及B-21轰炸机项目。波音防务是当之无愧的行业主力军，其专业实力毋庸置疑。
@594qr
Just commercial planes they cant build right anymore eh?
你的意思是，唯独商用飞机他们再也无法正确制造了？
@AnonymousVenator
@594qr Different teams, unless you think the people who make 747s also makes F-15s?
@594qr
那是不同的团队好吗！除非你以为造747客机的那帮人，同时也是在造F-15战斗机
@lqr824
People forget that around 1970, there were crashes with fatalities literally monthly just within the US and far more abroad. Read Wikipedia and start at Jan 1 of any year before 1975 or so, drink a shot for each fatal air crash, and you will not make it to the end of the year before you pass out. And for every fatal accident there were multiple accidents without fatalities. Now we travel 10x more passenger-miles and there have only been 4 crashes with fatalities in the last quarter-century other than 9/11. Of those 4, 1 was Boeing, 1 Airbus, 1 Bombardier, 1 British Aerospace. Even respected aircraft experts like Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles say with disdain that if Mr. Boeing himself was around he'd be shocked to see the state of Boeing's safety record--and they're right but not in the way they think. Mr. Boeing would call you a liar when you told him how phenomenally safe air travel is today. It's literally thousands of times safer than the safest car on the highways, for instance, and safer than trains.
人们都忘了，在 1970 年前后，单是美国境内每月就会发生数起致命空难，海外的此类事故更是要多得多。
你不妨去维基百科上查证一下，随便挑一个 1975 年之前的年份，从 1 月 1 日开始，每看到一起致命空难就喝一杯酒，那你绝对撑不到年末就会醉得不省人事。
而且，每发生一起致命空难，就会伴随多起人员死亡的飞行事故。
如今，航空客运周转量已经增长了十倍，可在过去的四分之一个世纪里，除了“911” 事件之外，全球范围内仅发生了 4 起致命空难。
这 4 起事故涉及的机型，分别出自波音、空客、庞巴迪和英国宇航这四家公司。
就连《格雷格的飞机与汽车》这类业内颇具权威性的平台，也都曾直言不讳地评价道：
倘若波音创始人尚在人世，看到如今波音的安全记录，定会深感震惊。他们说得没错，只是他们的解读角度，和事实本身并不一样。
现在的航空旅行比公路上最安全的汽车还要安全成千上万倍，也比火车更安全。
@mikeanderson9266
USA needs more focus on drones imho.
我认为美国需要更多关注无人机。
@theoneandonlyCameraMan
I just hope boeing doesn't builds their fighter jets like how they build their commercial airliners... wouldn't want the F-47 to fall apart like lego while cruising at mach 2 now would we ?
我只希望波音公司造战斗机时，别再沿用造民用客机那套路子
我可不想看到 F-47 在 2 马赫巡航的状态下，像乐高积木一样散架，对吧？
@ElPolloDiabloCH
At least the F-47 wont have any doors. So there's that.
至少 F-47 不会配备任何舱门。
这么看倒也算是个优势。
@Gilgwathir
US military: "hey, we just built a absolute technical monster that is so expensive we have to fleece our trading partners so we can actually pay for it. we call it tht F-35. Let's do it again! Gonna be great!"
美国军方：‘嘿，我们刚造出了一头绝对的技术怪兽，贵到我们必须薅盟友的羊毛才能付得起账单。我们管它叫F-35。咱们再这么干一次吧！肯定会很棒的！
@darkprometheus
the issue with the F-35 was there were to many people asking for different variations of the same thing. So the marine VTOL is different than the Air forces and so on. Some of them so much where even the airfrx isn't the same so a Marine one cannot be swapped with an Air Force one. They essentially created 2-3 versions of the F-35 that are not compatible with each other.
F-35的问题在于，有太多人要求对同一个东西做出不同的变体。所以，海军陆战队的垂直起降型和空军的版本就不一样，诸如此类。
其中一些差异非常大，甚至连机身结构都不相同，导致海军陆战队的飞机根本无法与空军通用。他们实际上制造了2到3种无法互相兼容的F-35版本。
@LiveFastRaceHard
I live in the North East & love aviation. Im almost certain I've head one flying over late at night a year or so back. Never heard any jet ever sound anything like it. Clear night's this happened 3 times, it sounded like the most insane low audible rolling thunder in the upper atmosphere that lasted for a good 3 minutes, you could tell it was going from horizon to horizon too.
我住在东北部，而且超爱航空。大约一年前的一个深夜，我几乎敢肯定我听到有架飞机从头顶飞过。
我从没听过任何喷气式飞机发出过这种声音。那是在晴朗的夜晚发生的，一共出现过三次。
那声音听起来就像是高层大气中传来的、疯狂的低沉轰鸣声，像滚动的雷声一样，持续了足足有三分钟。而且你能感觉到它是在从地平线的一端飞向另一端。
@Cezium29
It's crazy how 30 years later, we actually have fighter aircraft that look like alien spacecraft in the movie 'Independence Day'.
时隔三十年，我们竟然真的造出了外形酷似电影《独立日》里外星飞船的战斗机，这简直太不可思议了
@wayneelliott5392
The drones would have to have the same combat radius as the f-47, would have to keep up with it and would have to be the same or better level of stealth ++ or whatever they want to call it. Otherwise the mission would be restricted to only what the drones could manage
这些无人机必须具备与 F-47 相当的作战半径，必须能够跟上 F-47 的飞行节奏，还得拥有同等乃至更优的隐身性能 ，不管军方将这种性能等级称作什么。
否则，作战任务的执行范围将只能局限于无人机的能力极限之内。
@Ayouguys
Surprised he’s not calling it the “big beautiful fighter jet” or that he hasn’t tweeted out the classified blueprint on how it’s built.
我倒是挺意外，特朗普怎么没管它叫‘大而美战斗机’，也没见他把那张绝密的设计蓝图发到推特上。
@ToughAncientSpark
Drumpf has to put his name on everything. It's a wonder it wasn't called the F-Drumpf!
特朗普这人就爱凡事都冠上自己的名号。
真稀奇，这战机居然没被命名成 “F - 特朗普”！
@johnnysparkleface3096
Much was made of it's stealth, but the assisting drones had better be as stealthy.
外界对它的隐身性能大肆吹捧，但配套的僚机最好也能具备同等的隐身水准。
@anthonyharry6678
How is stealth preserved if drones aren't equally stealth capable?
如果无人机不具备同等隐身能力，隐身性如何得以保持？
@vwager
Make some of those drones refueling tankers, and they really extend their range. I could see jets with limited weapons taking a few fuel drones to shuttle them from the Continental US bases to Guam.
将其中一部分无人机可以改装为无人加油机，战机的航程便能得到大幅拓展。
不难想见，那些挂载武器有限的战斗机，可借助数架无人加油机的保障，从美国本土直接飞至关岛。
@stephenwalton9646
The F-22is primarily a BVR platform. Yes, it’s a great aerobatic mount but if properly deployed, the opposition will never see what hit them. The 22 then drops back and acts as a networked AWACS coordinate fifth gen assets thus becoming a force multiplier. Enter the latest iteration of the F-15 as a missile truck. A friend is one of three pilots to fly the YF-22 and the YF-23. There were some flaws in each but there were some configuration problems with the 23. Other than that, the programs were priced differently. The 22 was over a billion cheaper, initially.
F-22主要是一个超视距作战平台。没错，它的气动性能极佳，若部署得当，对手甚至永远不会看到究竟是什么东西击中了他们。
一击之后，F-22 便会后撤，充当网络化的空中预警与指挥平台，协调所有五代机作战资源，进而成为战力倍增器。
这时，最新改型的F-15（作为导弹卡车）就能派上用场了。
我有一位朋友，是全球仅有的三位同时驾驶过 YF-22 和 YF-23 两款原型机的飞行员之一。
两款机型其实都存在一些缺陷，但 YF-23 的问题主要出在构型设计上。
除此之外，两个项目的造价也存在差异。
F-22 的造价要比 YF-23 低得多
@RatedRTarzan
Isn't it strange we all live on the same planet and are fighting each other
我们明明同处一颗星球，却要彼此争斗不休，这难道不荒谬吗？
@tygarner7731
operational by 2028? I have no doubt that it’s full operational now. The F117 1st flight was in 81’ entered service in 83’ and wasn’t publicly acknowledged until 88’ where its production phase was in 90’ and in Desert Storm in 91’. If there is one thing I know, the military likes to stick to its processes and time lines. Much like the full acknowledgement of the F117, it wasn’t acknowledged for 7 years after its first flight l, “that we know of” F35 is what? 19 years old by now. Of course something has been in development within that 19 years time frx.
2028 年才具备全面作战能力？我绝不相信它现在还没形成完全作战能力。
F-117 隐身战机于 1981 年首飞，1983 年正式服役，却直到 1988 年才被官方公开承认；其量产阶段始于 1990 年，随后便参与了 1991 年的 “沙漠风暴” 行动。
我唯一敢肯定的是，军方向来习惯于严格遵循既定流程与时间节点。
就像 F-117 的公开历程那样 ——据我们所知，它在首飞 7 年后才被官方承认；如今的 F-35 呢？算下来也已经诞生 19 年了。
显然，在这 19 年的时间跨度里，某些新装备的研发工作必然早已悄然启动。
@mattwiper
One things for certain in will go well over budget for multiple reasons.
有一点是可以肯定的：它会因为种种原因，出现严重超支的情况。
@derekjs515
Why trust Boeing with this contract when Lockheed has proven itself to deliver? When Boeing has done the exact opposite.
洛克希德早已证明自己具备履约能力，为何还要把这份合同交给波音？
毕竟波音的表现，恰恰与此截然相反。
@henryknox1186
This plane has the same limitation as all other planes. The pilot, remove the pilot and you can make a plane that is really scary.
这款战机与其他所有战机一样，存在着相同的短板。
这个短板就是飞行员。一旦去掉飞行员，你就能造出一款真正令人胆寒的战机。
@crystalroche2168
Pretty sure the F35 isn't even close to being obsolete. By the time the F47 (eye roll) is up and running, it might be obsolete via drone tech
我很确定F-35离过时还远着呢。等到那个F-47（翻个白眼）真正上线运行的时候，说不定无人机技术已经发展到让有人战机彻底过时了
@actionhero5438
Boeing's F47 stealth aircraft will be impossible to locate in the skies. Sure, because it will be lying crashed on the ground
波音公司的 F-47 隐身战机将在空中难觅踪迹。
当然了，毕竟它只会坠毁在地面上，静静躺着。
@wskinn
Considering how much trouble the US has feeding the F-35's technological support hunger, the F-47 feels..... ambitious.
考虑到美国为满足 F-35 对技术保障的庞大需求已经麻烦不断
F-47 这个项目给人的感觉…… 实在是有些好高骛远。
@Ecosystem8
The U.S needs to build a space military
美国需要建立太空军事力量
@FANTOllVll
I think other countries capabilities in this sector were vastly inflated in the video. China hasn’t even developed a 5th gen fighter that’s seen mass production. The Russian 5th gen has like 10 planes total. Just because Chinese planes are tailless it doesn’t mean automatic 6th gen. EU being mentioned is a joke on its own.
我认为视频中对其他国家在该领域的实力，存在严重夸大的成分。
中国甚至还没研发出一款能大规模生产的五代机。俄罗斯的五代机总数也就十架左右。
不能仅仅因为中国的飞机没有尾翼，就说它就是六代机。至于欧盟吗，那本身就是一个笑话。
@Coupe-sy9nk
The only video's ive seen of this jet are from foreign youtube channels, they are covering American aircraft more than Americans
我看到的关于这款战机的视频，全都来自国外的油管频道
这些频道对美国战机的报道力度，甚至比美国本土媒体还要大
@robertwillett4122
Why does it seem like your ragging on the USAF. Have they not been the leader since the beginning of flight.
博主怎么好像一直在吐槽美国空军。
自人类飞行时代开启以来，他们不就一直是领跑者吗？
@brianvandevelde9638
Ps getting closer than 4000 km with a carrier can be tricky the DF 26 hypersonic rocket from China is made for this... don´t know how effective it will be?
航母想要抵近至 4000 公里范围以内，可不是一件容易的事
因为中国专门研发了东风-26高超音速导弹来对付这种情况……只是不知道它的实际效果究竟如何？
@johncouch9062
I doubt Boeing could build a paper airplane that flies safely by 2028
我怀疑波音公司到 2028 年，连一架能安全飞行的纸飞机都造不出来。
@Taco_God
What's the point of flying a jet with no tails to remain stealthy if all the drones around it have tails?
如果战机周边的无人机都带有尾翼，那驾驶一架无尾战机来实现隐身又有什么意义呢？
@Martian74
The stealth planes are all so expensive to maintain. Every time they fly the skin needs to be inspected for any defects, hitting an insect is bad, hitting a bird is terrible. This new experimental engine sounds like a nightmare to maintain. They may be technically able to make it do the things he spoke about, but each flight may need a week of maintenance before the plane can fly again. The B2 and F22 have shown how much maintenance these stealth planes need. I think drones are cheaper and seem to be the way of the future. $300 million each is just too expensive, and that number could become much worse.
隐身战机的维护成本全都高得离谱。
每次飞行过后，机身蒙皮都要全面检查有无缺陷。撞上飞虫已是不小的麻烦，若是撞上飞鸟，后果更是不堪设想。
这款全新的实验性发动机，听着就是维护人员的噩梦。
技术层面上，他们或许确实能让这款战机实现他口中所说的那些性能，但每次飞行结束后，战机可能都需要整整一周的维护才能再次升空。
B-2 和 F-22 的先例，早已印证了这类隐身战机的维护需求有多惊人。
我认为无人机的成本更低，而且俨然已是未来的发展趋势。
每架 3 亿美元的造价实在过于高昂，而且这个数字还有可能会进一步攀升。
@LaurenMiddleton28
It's modeled after the Chinese J 50.. but unfortunately the Chinese have a 5 year head start.. In head to head simulations the Chinese J 50 took out 6 F22's and 7 F35's. In under 4 minutes.
这款战机是仿照中国的歼 - 50 设计的…… 但遗憾的是，中国方面已经领先了 5 年时间。
在一对一的模拟对抗中，中国的歼 - 50 在短短 4 分钟内就击落了 6 架 F-22 和 7 架 F-35。
@aquilesca5tr0
There is no aircraft called j50
目前并不存在一款名为歼 - 50 的战机。
@_Shinasu
I guess the best airfrx would be a cross between the F22 and the F15, it does always make me laugh when they show vids of the fighter with drone swarms, either the fighter is going ridiculously slow for those drones, or those drones are not going to last very long with the very limited distance they will be able to travel. Unless they have made drone engines the best engines in the world
我认为最优的机身设计，应该是融合 F-22 与 F-15 两者的优势而成。
每次看到那些战机伴随无人机蜂群协同作战的视频，我总会忍不住发笑。
要么就是战机为了配合无人机，飞得慢得离谱。
要么就是这些无人机的航程极为有限，根本无法长时间续航。
除非他们已经把无人机的发动机，做成了全球顶尖的水平。
@zachr207
Let me guess, corruption is why Boeing won the contract over Lockheed Martin?
让我猜猜，波音之所以能赢过洛克希德·马丁拿到合同，是因为腐败吧？
@afailable
Trusting Boeing to accomplish this is crazy... Forcing the best companies in the industry to collaborate would be the best option, but staking it all on Boeing? Crazy
指望波音来完成这项任务，简直是疯了
让业内顶尖企业联手合作才是最佳方案，可要是把所有筹码都押在波音身上？这纯属疯癫之举。
关键词：
F-47
