这是中国什么新航母？游轮航母！
正文翻译
图
图
评论翻译
@我系肥陈
中国广州，有一个晚上的游船活动，叫做“珠江夜游”。现在你看到的这条船，是其中一条用于珠江夜游活动的游船。游船的名字叫做“华夏人寿保险号内河游轮”。这条船在2019年1月23日，由广东省航运集团旗下“蓝海豚”水上游品牌全新打造的全国首艘军事主题游船“华夏保险”号迎来了首航。今年是2026年，已经是7年过去了。我不确定这条船目前还在不在运行，不过已经是很久远的事情了。
@Orinslayer
Its a ferry guys.
就是艘（装修成航母）的渡轮，伙计们。
@wedmunds
No it's a floating restaurant.
不，这是个浮动餐厅。
@playerone8047
Technically, so are real aircraft carriers (not like the plaN can tell the diff ��)
从技术上讲，哪怕真正的航空母舰也是渡轮（我不像中国人民解放军能分得清）
@ommsterlitz1805
no it's for drone shows
不，这是用来做无人机表演的。
@温水煮青呱
我看见甲班上的餐桌了
@TFY-v8l
Sadly if the US tried to build this it would take 5 years and cost 2 billion.. and probably be over budget
悲哀的是，如果美国试图建造这样一艘船，得花5年时间，耗资20亿美元……而且很可能还会超支。
@veselikanal7738
And scrapped after 4 yrs��
而且4年后就报废了
@PollowPloopy5285
@veselikanal7738
No. First Congressional approval for more funding, then eventually scrapped. ��
不，先是国会批准追加资金，最后才报废。
@DiabolicalNihilist
The ship was designed around the Advanced Gun System (AGS). The idea was to sit close to the shore and fire GPS-guided shells (LRLAP) 80 miles inland to support Marines.
The Problem: When the Navy cut the order from 32 ships to just 3, the price of the specialized ammunition skyrocketed because there was no "economy of scale."
The Result: A single shell eventually cost $800,000 to $1 million—roughly the same price as a Tomahawk cruise missile. The Navy cancelled the ammo, leaving the Zumwalt with two massive 155mm guns that it literally cannot fire, lMao.
美国的这类型船是朱姆沃特，设计围绕先进舰炮系统（AGS）设计的。最初设想是靠近海岸，发射GPS制导炮弹（LRLAP），射程可达80英里，为海军陆战队提供火力支援。
问题在于：当海军将订单从32艘削减到仅3艘时，专用弹药价格因缺乏规模效应而飙升。
结果：单发炮弹最终要花费80万到100万美元——差不多等于一枚“战斧”巡航导弹的价格。海军随后取消了该弹药项目，导致朱姆沃尔特级驱逐舰装备的两门巨型155毫米舰炮根本无法开火，笑死。
@willyvereb
@DiabolicalNihilist Zumwalt-class actually came out fine. Then they tried to make the LCS and ignoring experts who actually worked with naval vessels using aluminum. Mind the modular packages. Then the whole fiasco with the Constellation-class happened...
朱姆沃尔特级其实还算不错。但后来他们搞了濒海战斗舰（LCS），却无视那些真正操作过铝制舰体海军舰艇的专家意见，还有那些模块化套件。再后来又出了星座级护卫舰的烂摊子……
@7Beanss
It would never be built to begin with.
它压根就不会被造出来。
@SlapStyleAnims
The US should focus on peace with China rather than hope to fight a war it would lose a quarter of its Navy in
美国应该专注于与中国实现和平，而不是幻想打一场会让自己损失四分之一海军的战争。
@chadly19
@SlapStyleAnims yeah right.. we just got a front row seat to watch how well C radars actually work against the American military. The answer: they don’t. Everything C builds is for propaganda purposes.. as a deterrent. None of their equipment is actually made to fight a real war. Problem with that, is once that’s exposed, the whole knows you’re a paper tiger
得了吧……我们刚刚亲眼见证了C雷达对抗美军的实际效果。答案是：根本没用。C造的一切都是为了宣传，充作威慑而已。他们的装备根本不是为打真实战争准备的。一旦这点被揭穿，全世界都知道你只是Z老虎。
@playerone8047
@SlapStyleAnims 1/4 of our navy would cost 4/1’s of C’s.. when C is ready to accept a multilateral world order, we can talk.
我们损失四分之一的海军，能让C损失全部。等C准备好接受多极世界秩序时，我们再谈吧。
@noyb649
@playerone8047 , What makes you think they don't? US just needs to get out of Asia.
是什么让你觉得他们还没准备好？美国只要退出亚洲就行了。
@dankopatrik5579
Its a restaurant XD
这就是个餐厅
@chadly19
At least it would work though ����♂️
至少它还能用吧
@gregoryhoff3281
Us wouldn't waste it's money on this.
美国才不会把钱浪费在这种东西上。
@skootmeister3994
No man, you’re thinking about a new rifle to replace the M4.
老兄，你想到的是要替换M4的新步枪吧。
@playerone8047
.. it would work, however..
……它确实能用，不过……
@AAAAAA-tj1nq
@playerone8047 LCS showed structural damage when travel at designed high speed. LCS are decommissioning at a fast pace. Zumwalt even worse. The guns doesn't work
濒海战斗舰（LCS）在以设计高速航行时出现结构损伤后正快速退役。朱姆沃尔特更糟，它的舰炮根本不能用。
@playerone8047
@AAAAAA-tj1nq don’t care, chopsticks. Show me some real proven capability.
我才不在乎呢，筷子佬。给我看看你们真正经过实战验证的能力。
@AAAAAA-tj1nq
@playerone8047 j10c shot down Indian French made rafale
歼-10C击落了印度的法国制造阵风战机
@playerone8047
@A @AAAAAA-tj1nq and? What is your point?
那又怎样？你想表达什么？
@julianusvictor327
@playerone8047 the zumwalt, a littoral combat ship that cant survive in littoral waters..
朱姆沃尔特，一艘连近海都活不下去的濒海战斗舰……
@anotherlostsoul9793
@julianusvictor327to be fair, the zumwalts are working, fully functional ships. The advanced gun system ammo just costs too much with only 3 ships, but otherwise still capable Guided Missile Destroyers with 80 vls.
公平地说，朱姆沃尔特级目前仍在服役，是完全可用的舰艇。只是因为只有3艘，先进舰炮系统的弹药太贵，但除此之外，它仍是具备80单元垂直发射系统的、能力全面的导弹驱逐舰。
@Kevin-cm5kc
Then the LCS. Then the constellation
美国搞了滨海战斗舰，现在又搞星座级。
@lolasdm6959
No it wouldn’t we are talking about a cruise ship buddy
不，你搞错了，我们说的是游轮，伙计。
@SirMandorallen
If the US built it, it would actually be a carrier and it would be able to threaten the sovereignty of small nations by itself
如果美国造它，那它真会是一艘航母，而且单凭自己就能威胁小国的主权。
@h7s8k9c3
The US, unlike China, is a very rich country, so it can afford wasting Money on useless shit
和中国不同，美国是个非常富裕的国家，所以它有能力把钱浪费在无用的垃圾上。
@appa609
Don't forget there are two actual soviet aircraft carriers the Kiev and Minsk being operated by Chinese private businesses as theme parks
别忘了，还有两艘真正的苏联航空母舰——“基辅号”和“明斯克号”，现在由中国私营企业运营成了主题公园。
@Horseshoecrabwarrior
I heard at least one of those was shut down and abandoned
我听说其中至少有一艘已经关闭废弃了。
@theaminoacid
@Horseshoecrabwarrior Minsk caught on fire in 2017/2018 unfortunately.
“明斯克号”在2017或2018年不幸起火了。
@germmanator
Kuznetsov ? @theaminoacid
“库兹涅佐夫号”呢？
@theaminoacid
@germmanator That became the Liaoning. So basically all USSR carriers left are either in India or China
那艘变成了“辽宁舰”。所以基本上所有剩下的苏联航母，不是在印度就是在中国。
@germmanator
@theaminoacid no, the Kuznetsov (formerly Tbilisi) also caught fire lol, and still is docked in Russia. Riga/Varyag was turned into Liaoning.
不对，“库兹涅佐夫号”（原名“第比利斯号”）也起火了，哈哈，现在还停泊在俄罗斯。“里加号”/“瓦良格号”被改成了“辽宁舰”。
@lihong6162
I grew up in Shenzhen and saw the Minsk carrier on the edge of my local beach for a long time����
我在深圳长大，很久以前就在我家附近海滩边看到过“明斯克号”航母
@ApolloPTT
That ship has more RGB lights then my desktop ��
这船的RGB灯比我台式机还多
@MrZZ-py4pq
At first I thought it was a toy on the rug floor
一开始我还以为是地毯上的玩具。
@lioraselby5328
what is this, a carrier for ants?
这是给蚂蚁用的航母吗？
@TheGodofplastic
No, it’s a restaurant, u see the tables and chairs
不，这是个餐厅，你没看见那些桌椅吗？
@skullofserpent5727
Close, drone swarms
差不多，其实是无人机群表演平台。
@TheCaveRat
It needs to be at least... three times bigger than this!
它至少得比现在大三倍才行！
@lioraselby5328
@TheCaveRat finally someone in the replies gets my joke
终于有人看懂我的梗了。
@TheCaveRat
@lioraselby5328 i know lMao!!
我知道啦，笑死！
@Ben734
@lioraselby5328 Hey some people just can't read good.
嘿，有些人就是读不懂。
@TrumpstienPhile
@Ben734 someone should make a school for kids who cant read good..perhaps a rich model could fund it��
也许该办一所学校，专门教那些读不好书的孩子……说不定哪个有钱模特愿意资助
@mappingshaman5280
it's a river cruise ship made to look like a carrier.
这是艘仿航母造型的内河游轮。
@berserkasaurusrex4233
They should have 11 of them.
他们应该有11艘这样的船。
@user4678-c9x
Ooh drone ships
哦，无人机舰！
@sumpahGWganteng
It's restaurant
这是餐厅。
@OsmanZubair-q6b
Liaoning aircraft carrier when he was a baby
这是“辽宁号”航母小时候的样子。
@accountantthe3394
They grow up so fast
它们长得真快啊。
@nicobruin8618
Ah those wacky Chinese, with their enormous civilian shipbuilding sector.
啊，这些古怪的中国人，拥有规模庞大的民用造船业。
@cherub3624
Yes, and their inability to make anything beyond a brown water fleet.
是啊，还有他们除了近海舰队外什么都造不出来。
@VashtheStampede007
@cherub3624 and their inability to be on par with US controlled western media propaganda
还有他们无法抗衡美国控制的西方媒体宣传。
@meepmerp6935
@VashtheStampede007 I dont think propoganda makes their ships any larger
我觉得宣传并不能让他们的船变大。
@VashtheStampede007
@meepmerp6935 you missed the point. Almost every opinion you have for China is a result of misinformed from westrn media bubble. China sucks at propaganda and unable to fight back
你没抓住重点。你对中国的几乎所有看法，都来自西方媒体的信息茧房。中国在宣传方面很弱，根本无力反击。
@meepmerp6935
@VashtheStampede007 I think you missed the point. Wether or not Propaganda is utilized doesnt change the obxtive facts about certain things. No disparity within the quality or quantity of misninformation makes a ship any larger or smaller, or changes its capabilities.
我觉得你才没抓住重点。无论是否使用宣传，都不会改变某些事物的客观事实。信息失真与否，并不会让一艘船变得更大或更小，也不会改变其实际能力。
@rejakex860
@meepmerp6935 Useful things don't need to be promoted; some things are constantly promoted precisely because they don't exist. Take racism, for example. China doesn't have racism, so it doesn't need to promote that fact. However, the United States, which has severe injustices against people of color, advocates for human rights all day long. It is the most active in starting wars but condemns other countries for being aggressive all the time.
有用的东西不需要宣传；有些东西之所以被不断宣传，恰恰是因为它们并不存在。比如种族主义。中国没有种族主义，所以不需要宣扬这一点。而美国对有色人种存在严重不公，却整天高喊人权。它最热衷于发动战争，却总指责别国好战。
@h3dbopqux6ekvas98
I see a floating banquet venue with tables and chairs for scenic river tour's.
我看这就是个带桌椅的浮动宴会场所，用于观光游河。
@Jakezillagfw
This looks like something for a smaller scale battle or an argumentative peice for a larger scale battle.
这看起来像是为小规模战斗设计的模型，或是为大规模战役制作的讽刺性作品。
@pablochan1023
Its like a restaurant ship, hace tables on it��������
就像一艘餐厅船，上面还有桌子
@WhisperingDeath
China sometimes reminds me of America before we legislated away fun and whimsy.
中国有时让我想起过去的美国——在我们用立法把乐趣和奇思妙想统统禁止之前。
@mintcake2668
You guys fly B2 at super bowl. Sure sounds whimsy to me.
你们还在超级碗上飞B-2轰炸机呢，听起来可真够“奇思妙想”的。
@robertshindeliii
@mintcake2668 and then we painted them like passenger plans to commit war crimes with
然后我们还把它们涂成客机的样子去实施战争罪行。
@DatOneSwedishBoi69
@robertshindeliii Hahaha.. And soon against Europe. But we're not messing around either.
哈哈哈……而且很快就要对欧洲动手了。不过我们也不是好惹的。
@IMNOTAMUSED1
@robertshindeliii - I remind you, that the only crime in war is to be defeated.
我提醒你，战争中唯一的罪行就是失败。
@robertshindeliii
@IMNOTAMUSED1 those are the only ones punished, not the only ones that are crimes. Kinda like how Trump has committed tons of crimes, like treason, whether or not he gets punished for them. Probably in the same boat for outcones here, though.
那只是唯一会被惩罚的罪行，而非唯一的罪行。就像特朗普犯了大量罪行，比如叛国，不管他是否受到惩罚。不过这次的结果可能也差不多。
@playerone8047
@mintcake2668 pretty fun too ��
确实挺有趣的
@simontist
It is a bit like the 1930s when they had Charlie Chaplin and the guys walking on steel girders building the Empire State Building. A time of enterprise and adventure
这有点像1930年代，那时有查理·卓别林，还有工人在帝国大厦钢梁上行走。那是个充满进取与冒险的时代。
@urbancohort4142
did we do that? i don't think we did that
我们干过这事吗？我觉得我们没干过。
@AnthonyJayy
It's surprising that Hollywood, Disney, or even Las Vegas didn't think to repurpose older US carriers into a theme park/casino/cruise
奇怪的是，好莱坞、迪士尼，甚至拉斯维加斯，居然没人想过把老旧的美国航母改造成主题公园、赌场或游轮。
@eugeneb2824
Yeees Disney vs Pepsi ⚔️ naval warfare
耶！迪士尼大战百事！海军作战！
@jaskey
I'd imagine there's plenty of information they didn't want getting out in those older carriers(especially with cold war mentality). General concepts of how things are laid out and function that might have carried over to the new carriers for example.
我猜那些老航母里有很多他们不想泄露的信息（尤其是冷战思维下）。比如整体布局和运作方式等通用概念，可能沿用到了新航母上。
@ericdueck9405
ok maybe I'm dumb, but wouldn't that make for a good coastal defence platform by being a mobile drone launcher?
好吧，也许我傻，但这难道不能作为沿海防御平台，充当移动无人机发射器吗？
@shoopoop21
Why not just launch drones from any number actually built for purpose boats? They don't a runway, or anything like that.
为什么不直接用任何一艘专为任务建造的船只发射无人机？它们又不需要跑道之类的东西。
@ericdueck9405
@shoopoop21 get rid of the fighter jet model on the front, keep the ski ramp and you got a platform for kamikaze and light recon drones
把前面的战斗机模型去掉，保留滑跃甲板，就能变成神风特攻和轻型侦察无人机的平台。
@shoopoop21
@ericdueck9405 I want you to name a cruiser that couldn't just do that by emptying the deck.
我要你举出一艘巡洋舰，说它清空甲板后做不到这点。
@i_accept_all_cookies
@shoopoop21 The idea is this would be smaller, cheaper than a conventional ship. Built for purpose would be fully automated, simultaneous refueling & rearming of dozens of drones, with more in storage.
关键在于这种船会更小、更便宜。专用设计可实现全自动操作，同时为数十架无人机加油挂弹，还有更多储存在舱内。
@jjstealth7
Restaurant boat
餐厅船。
@adamtruong1759
For a moment, I thought all those chairs and tables were the boat's complement of attack drones - I won't lie.
有那么一瞬间，我以为那些桌椅就是这艘船搭载的攻击无人机——我不骗你。
@withlove35
Mini RGB Aircraft carrier from temu ��
来自Temu的迷你RGB航母
@Norg1
They could make smaller carriers that house only drones tbo
说实话，他们完全可以造只搭载无人机的小型航母。
@missk1697
Would make for a good drone carrier
这倒挺适合作为无人机母舰。
@Veylon
Anything makes for a good drone carrier. That's what makes the things such a menace.
任何东西都能当无人机母舰。这也正是这类东西如此危险的原因。
@DrSmallarms
At first I thought it was a miniature on a model city
一开始我还以为是模型城市里的微缩景观。
@AvalancheZ250
I love how it has 16 on the deck, as if it were CV-16
我喜欢它甲板上有“16”这个数字，好像真是CV-16似的。
@RushimaV
The RGB is absolutely necessary
RGB灯绝对是必需的。
@novavortex7763
I thought it was a toy model, didn't know it was real LOL.
我以为这是个玩具模型，没想到是真的，笑死。
@Banky2402
Plot twist: They’re all drones
剧情反转：那些全是无人机。
@matthewle6344
Imagine that but with drones.... a drone carrier
想象一下，如果配上无人机……一艘无人机母舰。
@justynmychael8716
Should be called the paper dragon.
该叫它“纸老虎”。
@shawngill9286
You know could see a drone carrier being that size
这种尺寸确实可以做无人机母舰。
@AAAA-lt9hq
Drone ships could probably be this small and thus be more difficult to detect.
或许无人机舰也可以这么小，更难被探测到。
@DPoner
In reality, it's a missile/drone platform in disguise.������
实际上，这是一艘伪装成游轮的导弹/无人机平台。
@antimatter4733
Would be kinda interesting if China decided to build thousands of small unmanned drone carrier ships. Essentially making them disposable drone delivery platforms. Sure you could hit them with missiles if you got close enough (which they'd try their best to stay out of range of) but by then you'll likely be within range of Chinese anti ship missiles as well as the drones it's already launched.
如果中国决定建造数千艘小型无人无人机母舰，会很有意思。本质上就是可消耗的无人机投送平台。当然，如果你靠得足够近，可以用导弹击沉它们（但它们会尽量保持在射程外），不过到那时，你很可能已经进入中国反舰导弹和已发射无人机的打击范围了。
@davidgreenwood6029
That'd be a waste of money. Such a ship would have to get very close to use its drones, but would be vulnerable to attack from manned aircraft that could operate at a higher altitude than the drones and who would have greater range and standoff distance than the drones. Add VLS missile cells and advanced powerful radar to one an it would have some use, but would then be the size of a destroyer and no longer unmanned,.
那太浪费钱了。这种船必须靠近目标才能使用无人机，但却很容易遭到有人驾驶战机的攻击——因为有人战机飞行高度更高、航程更远、投弹距离更大。除非给它加装垂发导弹单元和先进强力雷达，那样才有用，但船体就得达到驱逐舰大小，也无法再做到无人化了。
@antimatter4733
@davidgreenwood6029 drones can have a range of thousands of kilometers and be able to hit aircraft flying at over 15km altitude.
I hope you don't think I was talking about an Fpv drone
无人机航程可达数千公里，还能打击15公里以上高空飞行的飞机。
希望你别以为我说的是FPV穿越机。
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 still not the range or speed or ceiling of fighter jets tho so my points valid.
但还是比不上有人战斗机的航程、速度或升限，所以我观点依然成立。
@antimatter4733
@davidgreenwood6029 fighter drones absolutely have the range and speed of manned jets. Not sure why you think they'd have less of either given they're just a more efficient version without having to carry around a human body and all the controls and support systems a human needs.
战斗无人机绝对具备有人战机的航程和速度。我不明白你为何觉得它们会更差——毕竟无人机更高效，不用搭载人体及配套的操控和生命支持系统。
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 feel free to educate me. Which Chinese fighter drones have the same range and ceiling as us manned jets? From what I've seen the ones with long range are slower there are none that can match manned us jets. Feel free to tell me which ones can.
欢迎指教。具体哪些中国战斗无人机在航程和升限上能媲美美国有人战机？据我所知，长航时的都比较慢，没有一种能比得上美军现役有人战机。请告诉我具体型号。
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 you might be right someday but Chinese drones are not there yet. The gj11 still falls short of the f35 in range speed and ceiling. The ch7 which is specialized for high altitude still falls short of us jets in service ceiling, the Chinese also don't have a real tanker fleet for in air refueling like the us does. Feel free to tell me which specific drones can match us jets.
也许将来你会对，但中国无人机目前还没到那一步。“攻击-11”在航程、速度和升限上仍不如F-35。“彩虹-7”虽专攻高空，但实用升限仍不及美军现役战机。而且中国也没有像美国那样的空中加油机队。请指出具体哪种无人机能匹敌美军战机。
@antimatter4733
@davidgreenwood6029 China has unveiled multiple supersonic j-10 sized fighter drones. Given the fact that drones are more space and weight efficient they'll definitely have more range than a standard jet.
Yes they're not currently in production. I wasn't implying China would have thousands of mini drone carriers built tomorrow, not sure why you got that idea...
中国已展示多款超音速、J-10尺寸的战斗无人机。鉴于无人机在空间和重量上更高效，航程肯定比标准战机更远。
是的，它们尚未量产。我没暗示中国明天就会造出上千艘微型无人机母舰，不知你为何会有这种想法……
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 yea they're not in production. And if we're talking about drones the size of fighter jets you can't have entire carriers for them be unmanned. That tech def doesn't exist. They need manned carriers to service them. You keep saying 'not sure why you'd think...' because you want to sound smug, well, that's why I'd think this, is because your idea makes no sense. The only drones that would work with a unmanned ship wouldn't be capable of anything. Not sure why you can't use your brain. If they were able to build thousands like you said they'd have to be small like you said but if they were small they couldn't launch large fighter jet sized drones and if they were large enough to, they couldn't be unmanned. Not sure why you believe in magic and not actual physics but here we are.
是的，它们没量产。而且如果我们说的是战斗机尺寸的无人机，整艘母舰不可能做到无人化——这种技术根本不存在。它们需要有人航母来维护。你老说“不知道你为啥会这么想”，无非是想显得自己很聪明。
我之所以这么想，是因为你的设想根本不合理。只有非常简单的小型无人机才适合无人舰，而那种无人机几乎毫无作战能力。如果你真能造出成千上万艘你说的那种小船，它们要么太小无法起降大型战斗机尺寸的无人机，要么足够大就无法做到无人化。真不明白你为什么相信魔法而不是物理定律。
@antimatter4733
@davidgreenwood6029 you absolutely can have unmanned drone carriers. It's literally a boat with a small ramp. UAVs can launch from very short runways using rocket boosters. If you really want to get complicated you could add an automated system to change weapons loads and refuel but that's not necessary. The boat is literally just a deployment system, it's only role is to allow you to disperse and extend the range of your UAVs.
Or go even further and make it a submarine. No reason why an unmanned drone carrier has to remain on the surface and not a couple hundred meters under water. Good luck targeting a thousand tiny silent submarines that can survive for months without moving or making a sound.
I see you suffer from a combination of cope and a lack of imagination. "Noo I don't understand how to do this therefore it can't be done"
Bro probably believes aliens built the pyramids or something with that logic
你完全可以拥有无人无人机母舰。它本质上就是带个小跳板的船。无人机可用火箭助推器从极短跑道起飞。如果真想复杂点，可以加自动挂弹和加油系统，但并非必需。这船纯粹就是个部署平台，唯一作用就是分散部署并延伸无人机的作战半径。
甚至可以做成潜艇。无人母舰没必要浮在水面，完全可以潜到几百米深。祝你好运——去追踪上千艘能静默潜伏数月、不移动也不发声的小型潜艇吧。
我看你既在自我安慰，又缺乏想象力。“不行，我不懂怎么做，所以就不可能实现。”
兄弟，按你这逻辑，大概也相信金字塔是外星人建的吧。
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 yea you can have unmanned drone carrier but only for very small simple drones. Not for drones that compete with full on jet fighters. You're just imagining sci fi nonsense that has no basis in reality. You also said small, there is no possible way that j20 sized drones can take off from small carriers. I have plenty of imagination I also understand what is beyond our current or even next gen technology. Just imagining something doesn't mean it can be built. Imagining a small carrier that could be built in the thousands but also deploy j20 sized drones with the range service ceiling and speed of jet fighters is nonsense. At the very least if it could deploy them they wouldn't be able to land again unless it was the size of a full on aircraft carrier and making j20 sized drones be single use and disposable is just not feasible financially it's very stupid.
你可以有无人无人机母舰，但仅限于非常小型简单的无人机，而不是能与完整战斗机抗衡的无人机。你只是在幻想毫无现实基础的科幻情节。
你还说“小型”——J-20尺寸的无人机根本不可能从小型母舰上起飞。我想象力很丰富，但也清楚什么超出了当前甚至下一代技术。光想象不代表能造出来。幻想一种能批量建造的小型母舰，同时又能部署具备战斗机级别航程、升限和速度的J-20尺寸无人机，纯属胡扯。
@Etho12574
I thought it was a new drone carrier��.
我还以为是新型无人机母舰
@dingo23451
It's whacky until you notice that those are suicide drones.
在你注意到那些其实是自杀式无人机之前，这艘船看起来都挺荒唐的。
@nriqueog
That would make a pretty good way to launch drones.
这倒是个发射无人机的好办法。
@RalphTempleton-vr6xs
Probably just as capable as their full-size copies will turn out to be
恐怕跟它们全尺寸复制品最终的表现一样可靠。
中国广州，有一个晚上的游船活动，叫做“珠江夜游”。现在你看到的这条船，是其中一条用于珠江夜游活动的游船。游船的名字叫做“华夏人寿保险号内河游轮”。这条船在2019年1月23日，由广东省航运集团旗下“蓝海豚”水上游品牌全新打造的全国首艘军事主题游船“华夏保险”号迎来了首航。今年是2026年，已经是7年过去了。我不确定这条船目前还在不在运行，不过已经是很久远的事情了。
@Orinslayer
Its a ferry guys.
就是艘（装修成航母）的渡轮，伙计们。
@wedmunds
No it's a floating restaurant.
不，这是个浮动餐厅。
@playerone8047
Technically, so are real aircraft carriers (not like the plaN can tell the diff ��)
从技术上讲，哪怕真正的航空母舰也是渡轮（我不像中国人民解放军能分得清）
@ommsterlitz1805
no it's for drone shows
不，这是用来做无人机表演的。
@温水煮青呱
我看见甲班上的餐桌了
@TFY-v8l
Sadly if the US tried to build this it would take 5 years and cost 2 billion.. and probably be over budget
悲哀的是，如果美国试图建造这样一艘船，得花5年时间，耗资20亿美元……而且很可能还会超支。
@veselikanal7738
And scrapped after 4 yrs��
而且4年后就报废了
@PollowPloopy5285
@veselikanal7738
No. First Congressional approval for more funding, then eventually scrapped. ��
不，先是国会批准追加资金，最后才报废。
@DiabolicalNihilist
The ship was designed around the Advanced Gun System (AGS). The idea was to sit close to the shore and fire GPS-guided shells (LRLAP) 80 miles inland to support Marines.
The Problem: When the Navy cut the order from 32 ships to just 3, the price of the specialized ammunition skyrocketed because there was no "economy of scale."
The Result: A single shell eventually cost $800,000 to $1 million—roughly the same price as a Tomahawk cruise missile. The Navy cancelled the ammo, leaving the Zumwalt with two massive 155mm guns that it literally cannot fire, lMao.
美国的这类型船是朱姆沃特，设计围绕先进舰炮系统（AGS）设计的。最初设想是靠近海岸，发射GPS制导炮弹（LRLAP），射程可达80英里，为海军陆战队提供火力支援。
问题在于：当海军将订单从32艘削减到仅3艘时，专用弹药价格因缺乏规模效应而飙升。
结果：单发炮弹最终要花费80万到100万美元——差不多等于一枚“战斧”巡航导弹的价格。海军随后取消了该弹药项目，导致朱姆沃尔特级驱逐舰装备的两门巨型155毫米舰炮根本无法开火，笑死。
@willyvereb
@DiabolicalNihilist Zumwalt-class actually came out fine. Then they tried to make the LCS and ignoring experts who actually worked with naval vessels using aluminum. Mind the modular packages. Then the whole fiasco with the Constellation-class happened...
朱姆沃尔特级其实还算不错。但后来他们搞了濒海战斗舰（LCS），却无视那些真正操作过铝制舰体海军舰艇的专家意见，还有那些模块化套件。再后来又出了星座级护卫舰的烂摊子……
@7Beanss
It would never be built to begin with.
它压根就不会被造出来。
@SlapStyleAnims
The US should focus on peace with China rather than hope to fight a war it would lose a quarter of its Navy in
美国应该专注于与中国实现和平，而不是幻想打一场会让自己损失四分之一海军的战争。
@chadly19
@SlapStyleAnims yeah right.. we just got a front row seat to watch how well C radars actually work against the American military. The answer: they don’t. Everything C builds is for propaganda purposes.. as a deterrent. None of their equipment is actually made to fight a real war. Problem with that, is once that’s exposed, the whole knows you’re a paper tiger
得了吧……我们刚刚亲眼见证了C雷达对抗美军的实际效果。答案是：根本没用。C造的一切都是为了宣传，充作威慑而已。他们的装备根本不是为打真实战争准备的。一旦这点被揭穿，全世界都知道你只是Z老虎。
@playerone8047
@SlapStyleAnims 1/4 of our navy would cost 4/1’s of C’s.. when C is ready to accept a multilateral world order, we can talk.
我们损失四分之一的海军，能让C损失全部。等C准备好接受多极世界秩序时，我们再谈吧。
@noyb649
@playerone8047 , What makes you think they don't? US just needs to get out of Asia.
是什么让你觉得他们还没准备好？美国只要退出亚洲就行了。
@dankopatrik5579
Its a restaurant XD
这就是个餐厅
@chadly19
At least it would work though ����♂️
至少它还能用吧
@gregoryhoff3281
Us wouldn't waste it's money on this.
美国才不会把钱浪费在这种东西上。
@skootmeister3994
No man, you’re thinking about a new rifle to replace the M4.
老兄，你想到的是要替换M4的新步枪吧。
@playerone8047
.. it would work, however..
……它确实能用，不过……
@AAAAAA-tj1nq
@playerone8047 LCS showed structural damage when travel at designed high speed. LCS are decommissioning at a fast pace. Zumwalt even worse. The guns doesn't work
濒海战斗舰（LCS）在以设计高速航行时出现结构损伤后正快速退役。朱姆沃尔特更糟，它的舰炮根本不能用。
@playerone8047
@AAAAAA-tj1nq don’t care, chopsticks. Show me some real proven capability.
我才不在乎呢，筷子佬。给我看看你们真正经过实战验证的能力。
@AAAAAA-tj1nq
@playerone8047 j10c shot down Indian French made rafale
歼-10C击落了印度的法国制造阵风战机
@playerone8047
@A @AAAAAA-tj1nq and? What is your point?
那又怎样？你想表达什么？
@julianusvictor327
@playerone8047 the zumwalt, a littoral combat ship that cant survive in littoral waters..
朱姆沃尔特，一艘连近海都活不下去的濒海战斗舰……
@anotherlostsoul9793
@julianusvictor327to be fair, the zumwalts are working, fully functional ships. The advanced gun system ammo just costs too much with only 3 ships, but otherwise still capable Guided Missile Destroyers with 80 vls.
公平地说，朱姆沃尔特级目前仍在服役，是完全可用的舰艇。只是因为只有3艘，先进舰炮系统的弹药太贵，但除此之外，它仍是具备80单元垂直发射系统的、能力全面的导弹驱逐舰。
@Kevin-cm5kc
Then the LCS. Then the constellation
美国搞了滨海战斗舰，现在又搞星座级。
@lolasdm6959
No it wouldn’t we are talking about a cruise ship buddy
不，你搞错了，我们说的是游轮，伙计。
@SirMandorallen
If the US built it, it would actually be a carrier and it would be able to threaten the sovereignty of small nations by itself
如果美国造它，那它真会是一艘航母，而且单凭自己就能威胁小国的主权。
@h7s8k9c3
The US, unlike China, is a very rich country, so it can afford wasting Money on useless shit
和中国不同，美国是个非常富裕的国家，所以它有能力把钱浪费在无用的垃圾上。
@appa609
Don't forget there are two actual soviet aircraft carriers the Kiev and Minsk being operated by Chinese private businesses as theme parks
别忘了，还有两艘真正的苏联航空母舰——“基辅号”和“明斯克号”，现在由中国私营企业运营成了主题公园。
@Horseshoecrabwarrior
I heard at least one of those was shut down and abandoned
我听说其中至少有一艘已经关闭废弃了。
@theaminoacid
@Horseshoecrabwarrior Minsk caught on fire in 2017/2018 unfortunately.
“明斯克号”在2017或2018年不幸起火了。
@germmanator
Kuznetsov ? @theaminoacid
“库兹涅佐夫号”呢？
@theaminoacid
@germmanator That became the Liaoning. So basically all USSR carriers left are either in India or China
那艘变成了“辽宁舰”。所以基本上所有剩下的苏联航母，不是在印度就是在中国。
@germmanator
@theaminoacid no, the Kuznetsov (formerly Tbilisi) also caught fire lol, and still is docked in Russia. Riga/Varyag was turned into Liaoning.
不对，“库兹涅佐夫号”（原名“第比利斯号”）也起火了，哈哈，现在还停泊在俄罗斯。“里加号”/“瓦良格号”被改成了“辽宁舰”。
@lihong6162
I grew up in Shenzhen and saw the Minsk carrier on the edge of my local beach for a long time����
我在深圳长大，很久以前就在我家附近海滩边看到过“明斯克号”航母
@ApolloPTT
That ship has more RGB lights then my desktop ��
这船的RGB灯比我台式机还多
@MrZZ-py4pq
At first I thought it was a toy on the rug floor
一开始我还以为是地毯上的玩具。
@lioraselby5328
what is this, a carrier for ants?
这是给蚂蚁用的航母吗？
@TheGodofplastic
No, it’s a restaurant, u see the tables and chairs
不，这是个餐厅，你没看见那些桌椅吗？
@skullofserpent5727
Close, drone swarms
差不多，其实是无人机群表演平台。
@TheCaveRat
It needs to be at least... three times bigger than this!
它至少得比现在大三倍才行！
@lioraselby5328
@TheCaveRat finally someone in the replies gets my joke
终于有人看懂我的梗了。
@TheCaveRat
@lioraselby5328 i know lMao!!
我知道啦，笑死！
@Ben734
@lioraselby5328 Hey some people just can't read good.
嘿，有些人就是读不懂。
@TrumpstienPhile
@Ben734 someone should make a school for kids who cant read good..perhaps a rich model could fund it��
也许该办一所学校，专门教那些读不好书的孩子……说不定哪个有钱模特愿意资助
@mappingshaman5280
it's a river cruise ship made to look like a carrier.
这是艘仿航母造型的内河游轮。
@berserkasaurusrex4233
They should have 11 of them.
他们应该有11艘这样的船。
@user4678-c9x
Ooh drone ships
哦，无人机舰！
@sumpahGWganteng
It's restaurant
这是餐厅。
@OsmanZubair-q6b
Liaoning aircraft carrier when he was a baby
这是“辽宁号”航母小时候的样子。
@accountantthe3394
They grow up so fast
它们长得真快啊。
@nicobruin8618
Ah those wacky Chinese, with their enormous civilian shipbuilding sector.
啊，这些古怪的中国人，拥有规模庞大的民用造船业。
@cherub3624
Yes, and their inability to make anything beyond a brown water fleet.
是啊，还有他们除了近海舰队外什么都造不出来。
@VashtheStampede007
@cherub3624 and their inability to be on par with US controlled western media propaganda
还有他们无法抗衡美国控制的西方媒体宣传。
@meepmerp6935
@VashtheStampede007 I dont think propoganda makes their ships any larger
我觉得宣传并不能让他们的船变大。
@VashtheStampede007
@meepmerp6935 you missed the point. Almost every opinion you have for China is a result of misinformed from westrn media bubble. China sucks at propaganda and unable to fight back
你没抓住重点。你对中国的几乎所有看法，都来自西方媒体的信息茧房。中国在宣传方面很弱，根本无力反击。
@meepmerp6935
@VashtheStampede007 I think you missed the point. Wether or not Propaganda is utilized doesnt change the obxtive facts about certain things. No disparity within the quality or quantity of misninformation makes a ship any larger or smaller, or changes its capabilities.
我觉得你才没抓住重点。无论是否使用宣传，都不会改变某些事物的客观事实。信息失真与否，并不会让一艘船变得更大或更小，也不会改变其实际能力。
@rejakex860
@meepmerp6935 Useful things don't need to be promoted; some things are constantly promoted precisely because they don't exist. Take racism, for example. China doesn't have racism, so it doesn't need to promote that fact. However, the United States, which has severe injustices against people of color, advocates for human rights all day long. It is the most active in starting wars but condemns other countries for being aggressive all the time.
有用的东西不需要宣传；有些东西之所以被不断宣传，恰恰是因为它们并不存在。比如种族主义。中国没有种族主义，所以不需要宣扬这一点。而美国对有色人种存在严重不公，却整天高喊人权。它最热衷于发动战争，却总指责别国好战。
@h3dbopqux6ekvas98
I see a floating banquet venue with tables and chairs for scenic river tour's.
我看这就是个带桌椅的浮动宴会场所，用于观光游河。
@Jakezillagfw
This looks like something for a smaller scale battle or an argumentative peice for a larger scale battle.
这看起来像是为小规模战斗设计的模型，或是为大规模战役制作的讽刺性作品。
@pablochan1023
Its like a restaurant ship, hace tables on it��������
就像一艘餐厅船，上面还有桌子
@WhisperingDeath
China sometimes reminds me of America before we legislated away fun and whimsy.
中国有时让我想起过去的美国——在我们用立法把乐趣和奇思妙想统统禁止之前。
@mintcake2668
You guys fly B2 at super bowl. Sure sounds whimsy to me.
你们还在超级碗上飞B-2轰炸机呢，听起来可真够“奇思妙想”的。
@robertshindeliii
@mintcake2668 and then we painted them like passenger plans to commit war crimes with
然后我们还把它们涂成客机的样子去实施战争罪行。
@DatOneSwedishBoi69
@robertshindeliii Hahaha.. And soon against Europe. But we're not messing around either.
哈哈哈……而且很快就要对欧洲动手了。不过我们也不是好惹的。
@IMNOTAMUSED1
@robertshindeliii - I remind you, that the only crime in war is to be defeated.
我提醒你，战争中唯一的罪行就是失败。
@robertshindeliii
@IMNOTAMUSED1 those are the only ones punished, not the only ones that are crimes. Kinda like how Trump has committed tons of crimes, like treason, whether or not he gets punished for them. Probably in the same boat for outcones here, though.
那只是唯一会被惩罚的罪行，而非唯一的罪行。就像特朗普犯了大量罪行，比如叛国，不管他是否受到惩罚。不过这次的结果可能也差不多。
@playerone8047
@mintcake2668 pretty fun too ��
确实挺有趣的
@simontist
It is a bit like the 1930s when they had Charlie Chaplin and the guys walking on steel girders building the Empire State Building. A time of enterprise and adventure
这有点像1930年代，那时有查理·卓别林，还有工人在帝国大厦钢梁上行走。那是个充满进取与冒险的时代。
@urbancohort4142
did we do that? i don't think we did that
我们干过这事吗？我觉得我们没干过。
@AnthonyJayy
It's surprising that Hollywood, Disney, or even Las Vegas didn't think to repurpose older US carriers into a theme park/casino/cruise
奇怪的是，好莱坞、迪士尼，甚至拉斯维加斯，居然没人想过把老旧的美国航母改造成主题公园、赌场或游轮。
@eugeneb2824
Yeees Disney vs Pepsi ⚔️ naval warfare
耶！迪士尼大战百事！海军作战！
@jaskey
I'd imagine there's plenty of information they didn't want getting out in those older carriers(especially with cold war mentality). General concepts of how things are laid out and function that might have carried over to the new carriers for example.
我猜那些老航母里有很多他们不想泄露的信息（尤其是冷战思维下）。比如整体布局和运作方式等通用概念，可能沿用到了新航母上。
@ericdueck9405
ok maybe I'm dumb, but wouldn't that make for a good coastal defence platform by being a mobile drone launcher?
好吧，也许我傻，但这难道不能作为沿海防御平台，充当移动无人机发射器吗？
@shoopoop21
Why not just launch drones from any number actually built for purpose boats? They don't a runway, or anything like that.
为什么不直接用任何一艘专为任务建造的船只发射无人机？它们又不需要跑道之类的东西。
@ericdueck9405
@shoopoop21 get rid of the fighter jet model on the front, keep the ski ramp and you got a platform for kamikaze and light recon drones
把前面的战斗机模型去掉，保留滑跃甲板，就能变成神风特攻和轻型侦察无人机的平台。
@shoopoop21
@ericdueck9405 I want you to name a cruiser that couldn't just do that by emptying the deck.
我要你举出一艘巡洋舰，说它清空甲板后做不到这点。
@i_accept_all_cookies
@shoopoop21 The idea is this would be smaller, cheaper than a conventional ship. Built for purpose would be fully automated, simultaneous refueling & rearming of dozens of drones, with more in storage.
关键在于这种船会更小、更便宜。专用设计可实现全自动操作，同时为数十架无人机加油挂弹，还有更多储存在舱内。
@jjstealth7
Restaurant boat
餐厅船。
@adamtruong1759
For a moment, I thought all those chairs and tables were the boat's complement of attack drones - I won't lie.
有那么一瞬间，我以为那些桌椅就是这艘船搭载的攻击无人机——我不骗你。
@withlove35
Mini RGB Aircraft carrier from temu ��
来自Temu的迷你RGB航母
@Norg1
They could make smaller carriers that house only drones tbo
说实话，他们完全可以造只搭载无人机的小型航母。
@missk1697
Would make for a good drone carrier
这倒挺适合作为无人机母舰。
@Veylon
Anything makes for a good drone carrier. That's what makes the things such a menace.
任何东西都能当无人机母舰。这也正是这类东西如此危险的原因。
@DrSmallarms
At first I thought it was a miniature on a model city
一开始我还以为是模型城市里的微缩景观。
@AvalancheZ250
I love how it has 16 on the deck, as if it were CV-16
我喜欢它甲板上有“16”这个数字，好像真是CV-16似的。
@RushimaV
The RGB is absolutely necessary
RGB灯绝对是必需的。
@novavortex7763
I thought it was a toy model, didn't know it was real LOL.
我以为这是个玩具模型，没想到是真的，笑死。
@Banky2402
Plot twist: They’re all drones
剧情反转：那些全是无人机。
@matthewle6344
Imagine that but with drones.... a drone carrier
想象一下，如果配上无人机……一艘无人机母舰。
@justynmychael8716
Should be called the paper dragon.
该叫它“纸老虎”。
@shawngill9286
You know could see a drone carrier being that size
这种尺寸确实可以做无人机母舰。
@AAAA-lt9hq
Drone ships could probably be this small and thus be more difficult to detect.
或许无人机舰也可以这么小，更难被探测到。
@DPoner
In reality, it's a missile/drone platform in disguise.������
实际上，这是一艘伪装成游轮的导弹/无人机平台。
@antimatter4733
Would be kinda interesting if China decided to build thousands of small unmanned drone carrier ships. Essentially making them disposable drone delivery platforms. Sure you could hit them with missiles if you got close enough (which they'd try their best to stay out of range of) but by then you'll likely be within range of Chinese anti ship missiles as well as the drones it's already launched.
如果中国决定建造数千艘小型无人无人机母舰，会很有意思。本质上就是可消耗的无人机投送平台。当然，如果你靠得足够近，可以用导弹击沉它们（但它们会尽量保持在射程外），不过到那时，你很可能已经进入中国反舰导弹和已发射无人机的打击范围了。
@davidgreenwood6029
That'd be a waste of money. Such a ship would have to get very close to use its drones, but would be vulnerable to attack from manned aircraft that could operate at a higher altitude than the drones and who would have greater range and standoff distance than the drones. Add VLS missile cells and advanced powerful radar to one an it would have some use, but would then be the size of a destroyer and no longer unmanned,.
那太浪费钱了。这种船必须靠近目标才能使用无人机，但却很容易遭到有人驾驶战机的攻击——因为有人战机飞行高度更高、航程更远、投弹距离更大。除非给它加装垂发导弹单元和先进强力雷达，那样才有用，但船体就得达到驱逐舰大小，也无法再做到无人化了。
@antimatter4733
@davidgreenwood6029 drones can have a range of thousands of kilometers and be able to hit aircraft flying at over 15km altitude.
I hope you don't think I was talking about an Fpv drone
无人机航程可达数千公里，还能打击15公里以上高空飞行的飞机。
希望你别以为我说的是FPV穿越机。
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 still not the range or speed or ceiling of fighter jets tho so my points valid.
但还是比不上有人战斗机的航程、速度或升限，所以我观点依然成立。
@antimatter4733
@davidgreenwood6029 fighter drones absolutely have the range and speed of manned jets. Not sure why you think they'd have less of either given they're just a more efficient version without having to carry around a human body and all the controls and support systems a human needs.
战斗无人机绝对具备有人战机的航程和速度。我不明白你为何觉得它们会更差——毕竟无人机更高效，不用搭载人体及配套的操控和生命支持系统。
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 feel free to educate me. Which Chinese fighter drones have the same range and ceiling as us manned jets? From what I've seen the ones with long range are slower there are none that can match manned us jets. Feel free to tell me which ones can.
欢迎指教。具体哪些中国战斗无人机在航程和升限上能媲美美国有人战机？据我所知，长航时的都比较慢，没有一种能比得上美军现役有人战机。请告诉我具体型号。
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 you might be right someday but Chinese drones are not there yet. The gj11 still falls short of the f35 in range speed and ceiling. The ch7 which is specialized for high altitude still falls short of us jets in service ceiling, the Chinese also don't have a real tanker fleet for in air refueling like the us does. Feel free to tell me which specific drones can match us jets.
也许将来你会对，但中国无人机目前还没到那一步。“攻击-11”在航程、速度和升限上仍不如F-35。“彩虹-7”虽专攻高空，但实用升限仍不及美军现役战机。而且中国也没有像美国那样的空中加油机队。请指出具体哪种无人机能匹敌美军战机。
@antimatter4733
@davidgreenwood6029 China has unveiled multiple supersonic j-10 sized fighter drones. Given the fact that drones are more space and weight efficient they'll definitely have more range than a standard jet.
Yes they're not currently in production. I wasn't implying China would have thousands of mini drone carriers built tomorrow, not sure why you got that idea...
中国已展示多款超音速、J-10尺寸的战斗无人机。鉴于无人机在空间和重量上更高效，航程肯定比标准战机更远。
是的，它们尚未量产。我没暗示中国明天就会造出上千艘微型无人机母舰，不知你为何会有这种想法……
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 yea they're not in production. And if we're talking about drones the size of fighter jets you can't have entire carriers for them be unmanned. That tech def doesn't exist. They need manned carriers to service them. You keep saying 'not sure why you'd think...' because you want to sound smug, well, that's why I'd think this, is because your idea makes no sense. The only drones that would work with a unmanned ship wouldn't be capable of anything. Not sure why you can't use your brain. If they were able to build thousands like you said they'd have to be small like you said but if they were small they couldn't launch large fighter jet sized drones and if they were large enough to, they couldn't be unmanned. Not sure why you believe in magic and not actual physics but here we are.
是的，它们没量产。而且如果我们说的是战斗机尺寸的无人机，整艘母舰不可能做到无人化——这种技术根本不存在。它们需要有人航母来维护。你老说“不知道你为啥会这么想”，无非是想显得自己很聪明。
我之所以这么想，是因为你的设想根本不合理。只有非常简单的小型无人机才适合无人舰，而那种无人机几乎毫无作战能力。如果你真能造出成千上万艘你说的那种小船，它们要么太小无法起降大型战斗机尺寸的无人机，要么足够大就无法做到无人化。真不明白你为什么相信魔法而不是物理定律。
@antimatter4733
@davidgreenwood6029 you absolutely can have unmanned drone carriers. It's literally a boat with a small ramp. UAVs can launch from very short runways using rocket boosters. If you really want to get complicated you could add an automated system to change weapons loads and refuel but that's not necessary. The boat is literally just a deployment system, it's only role is to allow you to disperse and extend the range of your UAVs.
Or go even further and make it a submarine. No reason why an unmanned drone carrier has to remain on the surface and not a couple hundred meters under water. Good luck targeting a thousand tiny silent submarines that can survive for months without moving or making a sound.
I see you suffer from a combination of cope and a lack of imagination. "Noo I don't understand how to do this therefore it can't be done"
Bro probably believes aliens built the pyramids or something with that logic
你完全可以拥有无人无人机母舰。它本质上就是带个小跳板的船。无人机可用火箭助推器从极短跑道起飞。如果真想复杂点，可以加自动挂弹和加油系统，但并非必需。这船纯粹就是个部署平台，唯一作用就是分散部署并延伸无人机的作战半径。
甚至可以做成潜艇。无人母舰没必要浮在水面，完全可以潜到几百米深。祝你好运——去追踪上千艘能静默潜伏数月、不移动也不发声的小型潜艇吧。
我看你既在自我安慰，又缺乏想象力。“不行，我不懂怎么做，所以就不可能实现。”
兄弟，按你这逻辑，大概也相信金字塔是外星人建的吧。
@davidgreenwood6029
@antimatter4733 yea you can have unmanned drone carrier but only for very small simple drones. Not for drones that compete with full on jet fighters. You're just imagining sci fi nonsense that has no basis in reality. You also said small, there is no possible way that j20 sized drones can take off from small carriers. I have plenty of imagination I also understand what is beyond our current or even next gen technology. Just imagining something doesn't mean it can be built. Imagining a small carrier that could be built in the thousands but also deploy j20 sized drones with the range service ceiling and speed of jet fighters is nonsense. At the very least if it could deploy them they wouldn't be able to land again unless it was the size of a full on aircraft carrier and making j20 sized drones be single use and disposable is just not feasible financially it's very stupid.
你可以有无人无人机母舰，但仅限于非常小型简单的无人机，而不是能与完整战斗机抗衡的无人机。你只是在幻想毫无现实基础的科幻情节。
你还说“小型”——J-20尺寸的无人机根本不可能从小型母舰上起飞。我想象力很丰富，但也清楚什么超出了当前甚至下一代技术。光想象不代表能造出来。幻想一种能批量建造的小型母舰，同时又能部署具备战斗机级别航程、升限和速度的J-20尺寸无人机，纯属胡扯。
@Etho12574
I thought it was a new drone carrier��.
我还以为是新型无人机母舰
@dingo23451
It's whacky until you notice that those are suicide drones.
在你注意到那些其实是自杀式无人机之前，这艘船看起来都挺荒唐的。
@nriqueog
That would make a pretty good way to launch drones.
这倒是个发射无人机的好办法。
@RalphTempleton-vr6xs
Probably just as capable as their full-size copies will turn out to be
恐怕跟它们全尺寸复制品最终的表现一样可靠。
