中国会成为世界领先的经济体吗？
正文翻译
图
图
评论翻译
@chewy1709
China has capitalism for companies and socialism for masses. US has socialism for companies and capitalism for the masses.
中国实行企业资本主义和大众社会主义；美国则是企业实行社会主义，大众实行资本主义。
@john99776
China has industrial capitalism and socialism. The US has financial capitalism and is an oligarchy. Michael Hudson explains this best.
中国有工业资本主义和社会主义，美国是金融资本主义和寡头政治。迈克尔-赫德森对此做出了最好的解释。
@wwbren
And as part of the masses, I know who I support. Unlike the masses in the US, they identify with the companies.
作为群众的一员，我知道我支持谁。与美国群众不同，他们认同公司。
@辛Mario
Let me tell you a story. There was a village leader in China striving to build a bridge in his village. From a long-term standpoint, the bridge would increase the connectivity and accessibility of the region. However, the majority of the residents in the village didn't see it the way as the leader did, because the construction would probably take a few years, and it would cause inconvenience to them transporting their products to the outside world. If this were to take place in the states, the leader would be voted out of the office like hundreds of times.
让我给你们讲一个故事。在中国，有一位村长努力在村里修建一座桥。从长远的角度来看，这座桥将提高该地区的连通性和可达性。然而，村里的大多数居民并不像村长那样认为，因为建造这座桥可能需要几年的时间，而且会给他们向外界运输产品带来不便。如果这种情况发生在美国，领导者肯定会被选下台几百次。
@michaelloong964
Us businessman core interest is to make more money, China businessman core interest is to make sure business is successful.
美国商人的核心利益是赚更多的钱，中国商人的核心利益是确保生意成功。
@gelinrefira
It's just the first stage of socialism. They need to expand their productive forces first and use capitalistic market forces to do some parts of that. They are still moving towards Communism when they know they can get out of this first stage
这只是社会主义的第一阶段。他们需要首先扩大生产力并利用资本主义市场力量来完成其中的部分工作。当他们知道可以走出第一阶段时，他们会继续向共产主义迈进。
@1981cutting
I like what * ** said, “The people's aspiration for a better life is the responsibility of the government.
我喜欢***所说的“人民对美好生活的向往，就是政府的责任”。
@peanut0brain
And "common prosperity with a shared future for humanity"
以及“共同繁荣，人类命运共同体”。
@amandagrant4331
"Disaster relief" is something unique to socialist countries.
The U.S. government has no responsibility for disaster relief, for the sake of civil liberties.
"救灾"是社会主义国家特有的东西。
美国政府为了维护公民自由，不承担救灾责任。
@RoyFJ65
China deserves it all, they worked hard for it and stabilized their country with right priorities.
这一切都是中国应得的，他们为此付出了艰辛的努力并以正确的优先顺序稳定了国家。
@nahlene1973
It is surprising to me that such a seemingly "common sense", is missing in most governance.
让我感到惊讶的是这种看似"常识"的东西，在大多数治理中都缺失了。
@user-yg31415
There is a saying by some scholars: China does not change its party, but its policy changes, while America changes its parties between Dem/Rep, yet its policy does not change.
有学者说过这样一句话：虽然中国不换党，但政策会变；而美国在民主/共和之间换党，但政策不变。
@tigading2177
It's all about choices, Americans choose their brand of "freedom and democracy and we must defend their rights to have complete "freedom", we must ensure they continue to vote/elect to replace Red with Blue or Blue with Red party, whatever. Let them be. It is fun to watch.
这一切都与选择有关，美国人选择了他们的"自由和民主"，我们必须捍卫他们拥有完全"自由"的权利，我们必须确保他们继续投票/选举，以蓝党取代红党，或以红党取代蓝党，随便。随他们去吧。这很有趣。
@CobraQuotes1
it's NOT just a large population because we have a large population, it's the quality of the population.
这不仅仅是因为我们人口众多，而是人口的质量问题。
@Alberto-xw8vx
It's the culture, it's the right one.
这是因为文化，正确的文化。
@ladygracienyc2029
@hengongchua6250
It's not helpful and also not true that one nation has a better culture than another. It's okay to criticize government but people are the same. You have good and bad in all countries.
一个国家的文化比另一个国家的文化更好，这种说法毫无帮助，也不符合事实。批评政府没问题，但人都是一样的，每个国家的人都有好有坏。
@MarkMiller304
@ladygracienyc2029 culture makes all the difference. One respects education and teachers, the other doesn’t. Where do you think these 2 different mindsets will lead in the long run?
The sooner you drop this political correctness and be honest with your failings the faster you’ll be able to fix your problems.
文化决定一切。一个尊重教育和教师，另一个则不尊重。从长远来看，您认为这两种不同的心态会导致什么结果？
越早放弃政治正确，坦诚面对自己的不足，就能越快地解决问题。
@carnut5691
Not only strategic long term planning, there is this support & trust in the government. Once a goal is set, they all move in the same direction.
中国不仅有战略性的长期规划，还有对政府的支持和信任。一旦确定了目标，大家就会朝着同一个方向前进。
@fool9111z
Not really. It is also very chaotic. But China has often been led and protected by very talented wise and patriotic elites, throughout history.
I think this quality of elites is the soul of a country and Chinese civilization.
其实不然，中国也很混乱。但纵观历史，中国常常被才华横溢、智慧和爱国的精英所领导和保护。
我认为这种精英品质是一个国家和中华文明的灵魂。
@john99776
@fool9111z But this is no accident. The type of governance allows these excellent elites to rise. In the US it's the opposite - good people are ignored and repressed by the system.
但这并非偶然，正是这种治理方式让这些优秀的精英得以崛起。而在美国，情况恰恰相反--优秀的人被制度忽视和压制。
@zaitinmak5671
China built their first overseas train in Saudi Arabia at a loss . And they gained a lot more projects from Saudi Arabia thereafter .
中国在亏损的情况下在沙特阿拉伯建造了第一列海外高铁。此后，他们从沙特获得了更多的项目。
@AlexanderTheGreat-f5r
The China Energy Engineering Corporation (CEEC) has signed an engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract to develop a 2 GW solar project in Saudi Arabia. The US$972m Haden solar project, will be built in western Saudi Arabia, 93 km northeast of Taif, Makkah province.20 Aug 2024
750 Chinese companies are currently operating in Saudi Arabia, contributing to major construction projects, including NEOM.
What are the China Harbour projects in Saudi Arabia?
In Saudi Arabia, CHEC has undertaken the construction of numerous large-scale projects, including the Jeddah Red Sea Gateway, Jazan Port, Yanbu Waterfront Park, Dammam Port, Jeddah JSDP Project, Jazan Dredging and Reclamation, Jazan Water Supply and Drainage, the artificial islands for the Saudi-Bahrain Causeway
中国能源工程集团公司（CEEC）签署了一份工程、采购和施工（EPC）合同，将在沙特阿拉伯开发一个2 GW的太阳能项目。这个耗资9.72亿美元的Haden太阳能项目将建在沙特阿拉伯西部，麦加省塔伊夫东北93公里处。
目前有750家中国公司在沙特阿拉伯开展业务，为包括NEOM在内的大型建设项目做出了贡献。
沙特阿拉伯有哪些中国项目？
在沙特阿拉伯，中国能源工程集团公司（CEEC）承建了许多大型项目，包括吉达红海门户、贾赞港、延布海滨公园、达曼港、吉达JSDP项目、贾赞疏浚和填海、贾赞供水和排水、沙特-巴林堤道人工岛等。
@willengel2458
China didn't build the HS trains in Saudi Arabia. those are from Spain. the Spanish company wasn't able to build the railroads in the dessert, so they contracted it out to China. China built the rail road for the Saudis, not the HS trains.
西班牙公司没有能力在沙漠地区修建铁路，因此他们将工程承包给了中国，中国为沙特人修建的是铁路而不是高铁列车。
@Zopdoz
Long term thinking is ingrained in their culture, with that mindset, it's a definite win! The clear look into their history pretty much says it all. They've been at the top, for long, the century of humiliation was just a setback, so they're coming back with a bang.
长期思维在他们的文化中根深蒂固，有了这种心态，他们必胜无疑！回顾他们的历史，几乎可以说明一切。他们长期处于巅峰状态，百年屈辱不过是一次挫折，所以他们会一鼓作气，卷土重来。
@foodparadise5792
This boils down to the type of civilization. China is the only surviving ancient agricultural civilization which requires collectivism(for land cultivation, fertilization, and harvest) and patient(you always make seasonal planning for seeding)... where nomads were more opportunistic, come and go, grab what ever along the path.
China was the biggest economy most of the time in the world for the last 2500-ish years since the establishment of the silk road. "The rise of China" isn't correct, should be the return of China.
这可以归结为文明的类型。中国是唯一现存的古代农业文明，需要集体主义（耕种土地、施肥和收获）和耐心（总是要制定季节性播种计划）......而游牧民族更多的是机会主义，他们来了就走，沿路什么都抢。
自丝绸之路建立以来的约2500年间，中国在大多数时候都是世界上最大的经济体，说中国崛起"并不正确”，应该是"中国回归"。
@pierreshi6102
Yes. Do note that tea, silk, and China were massively profitable technologies stolen by outsiders. Also, during the Song dynasty, China had anywhere from 50% to 90% of the global GDP. Us Chinese have always preferred peace and planning compared to the nomadic rob and run and warring.
是的。请注意，茶叶、丝绸和瓷器都是被外人窃取的利润丰厚的技术。此外，在宋朝，中国的国内生产总值占全球的50%至90%。与游牧民族的抢掠和战争相比，我们中国人一直更喜欢和平与规划。
@badimpulses17
All the haters always say China copy and they dont innovate. These people are so ignorant they never leave their bubble.
所有讨厌中国的人总是说中国抄袭，他们没有创新，这些人太无知了，他们从未离开过自己的泡泡。
@MarcoMasseria
Does it matter? How much advancement is actually coming? Flying cars? EV vehicles?
Making stuff matters much more (doing) than having ideas (thinking).
这重要吗？到底有多少进步即将到来？飞行汽车？电动汽车？制造东西（行动）比拥有想法（思考）更重要。
@AlexanderTheGreat-f5r
Who says China is not innovating ?
Take a look at this.
China is far ahead of other countries in generative AI inventions like chatbots, filing six times more patents than its closest rival the United States.
China leads the world with 38,210 inventions, far surpassing the U.S. (6,276)
谁说中国没有创新？
来看看这个。
中国在聊天机器人等生成式人工智能方面遥遥领先于其他国家，中国申请的专利数量是其最接近的竞争对手美国的六倍。
中国以38210项发明居世界首位，远远超过美国（6276项）。
@stephenlock7236
That observation about the short term thinking of the US is very true. That actually makes the US a very unreliable and untrustworthy partner in any treaty or agreement. And this is not a theoretical situation. There is a long list of treaties and agreements which the US has unilaterally withdrew once the incumbent were kicked out of office.
关于美国短期思维的看法非常正确，这实际上使得美国在任何条约或协议中都是一个非常不可靠和不可信任的伙伴。这并不是理论上的情况，有一长串的条约和协议是美国在执政者被赶下台后单方面撤销的。
@kaahzvi5820
It is painfully obvious in their foreign policies. Close allies like Canada, Western Europe, etc has to grapple with and reorientate in the Trump era.
这在他们的外交政策中表现得非常明显，加拿大、西欧等亲密盟友必须在特朗普时代努力应对并调整方向。
@borinvlogs
China is already decades ahead of US, EU and pretty much other countries in many areas. 90% of world's solar is in China, 90% of world's highest railway (bullet trains) are in China, 90% of world's top rarest minerals are controlled by China. China also has 400x ship building capacity than US which is just mind blowing.
中国在许多领域已经领先美国、欧盟和几乎所有其他国家数十年。世界上90%的太阳能在中国，世界上90%的高速铁路（子弹头列车）在中国，世界上90%的稀土矿产由中国控制。中国的造船能力也是美国的400倍，这简直令人震惊。
@judywu5514
Because Chinese work hard and when China respect other country's own will and help it to develop ,not like America and West countries just to exploit it and get thing they want and left mess
因为中国人勤劳，而且中国尊重其他国家的意愿，帮助它们发展，而不是像美国和西方国家那样剥削其他国家，在得到他们想要的东西后留下一片混乱。
@MichaelBurggraf-gm8vl
An important aspect is in many Asian countries their attitude towards learning. I think that this is similarly important as strategic planning.
一个重要的方面是许多亚洲国家对学习的态度，我认为这与战略规划同样重要。
@CCY-hx2hr
Many Chinese refer to themselves as ‘读书人’, which directly translates to ‘book reader’, but its true meaning is closer to ‘scholar’. The Chinese culture places great importance on studying and education.
许多中国人称自己为"读书人"，直译为"读书的人"，但其真正含义更接近于"学者"。中国文化非常重视学习和教育。
@yaqiwang5242
In US surprisingly lots of people think high education is not needed or not worthwhile partly due to high tuition rates. They don’t realize high education can give you more opportunities, open your mind by meeting people and force you to think hard problems, etc. Culture influences shaping people’s perceptions are also important.
在美国，令人惊讶的是很多人认为不需要或不值得接受高等教育，部分原因是高昂的学费。他们没有意识到高等教育能给你带来更多机会，通过与人交往打开你的心扉，迫使你思考棘手的问题等。影响人们观念的文化因素也很重要。
@CCY-hx2hr
@yaqiwang5242 in China culture, to be a ‘book reader’ is a big honor.
I felt same as the west call someone ‘knight’.
在中国文化中，能成为"读书人"是一种莫大的荣耀。
我的感觉就像西方人称某人为"骑士"一样。
@horridohobbies
I always say that China plays weiqi (or go), while the United States plays tic-tac-toe.
Weiqi is all about long-term strategy. Tic-tac-toe is only about very short-term tactics.
我常说中国人玩围棋，而美国玩井字棋。
围棋讲究长期战略，而井字棋只讲究短期战术。
@sunnytalks203
@horridohobbies weiqi is the most difficult board game, for chess, it may take 1 hour or so to finish the game, weiqi takes minimum 4 hours or more to finish the game
围棋是最难的棋类游戏，下国际象棋可能要1个小时左右才能下完，而下围棋至少要4个小时以上才能下完。
@Seicks
I think Europe is actually in the worst situation. At least the USA know where their short time interests are. European leaders can't even plan that. Completely paralyzed.
我认为欧洲的情况其实最糟糕，至少美国知道他们的短期利益在哪里，而欧洲领导人甚至无法制定计划，它们完全瘫痪了。
@jameslum8822
Western Europe is resource poor. Miserable decades on the horizon.
西欧资源贫乏，悲惨的几十年即将到来。
@tigading2177
@jameslum8822 That is just natural order of things, W.Europe has long standing history and culture of theft, l00ting, ge no side of natives all over the world, which led them to rapid industrialization, carbon emitters, enormous wealth to fuel ever increasing economic terrorism/sanction on others etc. Now that all their wealth is squandered or tucked away in some off shore accts by American oligarchs with multiple passports. The USUK led west is well on its back to Dickensian era.
这只是自然规律，西欧有着悠久的历史和文化，对全世界的土著进行盗窃、抢劫和掠夺，这使他们迅速实现了工业化，成为碳排放国，拥有了巨额财富，为日益增长的经济恐怖主义/对他国的制裁提供了燃料。现在，他们所有的财富都被持有多种护照的美国寡头挥霍或藏匿在一些离岸账户中。英美领导的西方国家正在向狄更斯时代迈进。
@barrywong4327
Well, the Chinese civilization has thrived for 4000+ years with ups and downs. More ups than downs. It has developed a culture of long-term thinking, patience, resiliency and pragmatism. People will make sacrifices without complaints knowing the future will be better, even if they themselves may not see that future themselves.
The American culture is one of instant gratification. Americans have no idea what tough times mean. They’re accustomed to living large and living for the moment. They have no idea what tough times really mean.
The American system is seriously flawed in many ways. The most fatal one is the fact that the system promotes incompetent, short-sighted, narrow-minded crooks as leaders. They talk large, give beautiful speeches, promise the world but they don’t deliver.
China will continue to grow in its influence and contributions to humanity. For its part, the US will continue to shrink in contrast. It is inevitable.
好吧，中华文明在跌宕起伏中繁荣了4000多年，起多于落，它已经形成了一种长期思考、耐心、坚韧和务实的文化。人们会毫无怨言地做出牺牲，因为他们知道未来会更好，即使他们自己可能看不到那个未来。
美国文化是一种急功近利的文化，美国人不知道艰难时期意味着什么，他们习惯于过着奢侈的生活，活在当下。他们不知道艰难时期的真正含义。
美国的制度在许多方面都存在严重的缺陷，其中最致命的一点是这种制度推举无能、目光短浅、心胸狭隘的骗子担任领导人。他们夸夸其谈，发表漂亮的演讲，向全世界许下承诺，但却不能兑现。
中国将继续增强其对人类的影响力和贡献，而美国则将继续萎缩，这是不可避免的。
@MichaelZhuang
BYD sold more than half a million in October alone, their annual sale is way above 2 millions, more like 5 millions.
比亚迪仅在10月份就售出了50多万辆汽车，其年销量远远超过200万辆，更接近500万辆。
@bearpolo3618
It took BYD 15 years to build its first 5 million cars, and it only took 15 months to build the 2nd 5 million cars.
比亚迪用15年时间生产了第一批500万辆汽车，而生产第二批500万辆汽车只用了15个月。
@JD-yz4kr
US domestic policy may be on a four-year cycle, but not its foreign policy. US foreign policy has bi-partisan support in the government. Regardless of whether it is a Democrat or a Republican is in charge, the military-industrial complex is in charge.
美国的国内政策可能以四年为一个周期，但外交政策并非如此。美国的外交政策得到政府两党的支持，不管是民主党还是共和党掌权，军工复合体都说了算。
@Wecareus
Thank you for bringing an outsider perspective from Portugal. Unfortunately videos similar to this one is indeed the excuse for politicians and media to try everything, no matter how low and insidious, to stop China’s development.
感谢你从葡萄牙带来的局外人视角，遗憾的是类似的视频确实是政客和媒体千方百计阻止中国发展的借口，无论这些手段是多么卑鄙和阴险。
@rdzhang
I have been living in the US for over 30 years. The key difference between China and US is the quality of high school education. Plus self-discipline. Many American people love freedom but no self-discipline. The American public schools are totally failed. Chinese people are working much harder than American peers.
我在美国生活了30多年。中国和美国的主要区别在于高中教育的质量，还有自律。很多美国人热爱自由，但不自律。美国的公立学校完全失败了，中国人比美国的同龄人更努力。
@你我-k7e
Freedom and self-discipline are not opposites! Freedom is inherent to human nature, while self-discipline relies on cultivation through experience. Only those who practice self-discipline truly understand what freedom means. As the ancient Chinese saying goes: Do not impose on others what you yourself do not desire!
自由和自律不是对立的！自由是人类的天性，自律依赖后天的培养，只有自律的人才知道什么是真正的自由，中国有句古话，己所不欲，勿施于人！
@bizhope007
Freedom without self discipline is doomed to fail and we can see the results, drug abuse, depression, confusion, lack of self control, lack of common decencies and respect for others... and the list goes on.. sadly.��
没有自律的自由是注定要失败的，我们可以看到其结果：吸毒、抑郁、混乱、缺乏自控力、缺乏礼仪和对他人的尊重......这样的例子不胜枚举......令人痛心。
China has capitalism for companies and socialism for masses. US has socialism for companies and capitalism for the masses.
中国实行企业资本主义和大众社会主义；美国则是企业实行社会主义，大众实行资本主义。
@john99776
China has industrial capitalism and socialism. The US has financial capitalism and is an oligarchy. Michael Hudson explains this best.
中国有工业资本主义和社会主义，美国是金融资本主义和寡头政治。迈克尔-赫德森对此做出了最好的解释。
@wwbren
And as part of the masses, I know who I support. Unlike the masses in the US, they identify with the companies.
作为群众的一员，我知道我支持谁。与美国群众不同，他们认同公司。
@辛Mario
Let me tell you a story. There was a village leader in China striving to build a bridge in his village. From a long-term standpoint, the bridge would increase the connectivity and accessibility of the region. However, the majority of the residents in the village didn't see it the way as the leader did, because the construction would probably take a few years, and it would cause inconvenience to them transporting their products to the outside world. If this were to take place in the states, the leader would be voted out of the office like hundreds of times.
让我给你们讲一个故事。在中国，有一位村长努力在村里修建一座桥。从长远的角度来看，这座桥将提高该地区的连通性和可达性。然而，村里的大多数居民并不像村长那样认为，因为建造这座桥可能需要几年的时间，而且会给他们向外界运输产品带来不便。如果这种情况发生在美国，领导者肯定会被选下台几百次。
@michaelloong964
Us businessman core interest is to make more money, China businessman core interest is to make sure business is successful.
美国商人的核心利益是赚更多的钱，中国商人的核心利益是确保生意成功。
@gelinrefira
It's just the first stage of socialism. They need to expand their productive forces first and use capitalistic market forces to do some parts of that. They are still moving towards Communism when they know they can get out of this first stage
这只是社会主义的第一阶段。他们需要首先扩大生产力并利用资本主义市场力量来完成其中的部分工作。当他们知道可以走出第一阶段时，他们会继续向共产主义迈进。
@1981cutting
I like what * ** said, “The people's aspiration for a better life is the responsibility of the government.
我喜欢***所说的“人民对美好生活的向往，就是政府的责任”。
@peanut0brain
And "common prosperity with a shared future for humanity"
以及“共同繁荣，人类命运共同体”。
@amandagrant4331
"Disaster relief" is something unique to socialist countries.
The U.S. government has no responsibility for disaster relief, for the sake of civil liberties.
"救灾"是社会主义国家特有的东西。
美国政府为了维护公民自由，不承担救灾责任。
@RoyFJ65
China deserves it all, they worked hard for it and stabilized their country with right priorities.
这一切都是中国应得的，他们为此付出了艰辛的努力并以正确的优先顺序稳定了国家。
@nahlene1973
It is surprising to me that such a seemingly "common sense", is missing in most governance.
让我感到惊讶的是这种看似"常识"的东西，在大多数治理中都缺失了。
@user-yg31415
There is a saying by some scholars: China does not change its party, but its policy changes, while America changes its parties between Dem/Rep, yet its policy does not change.
有学者说过这样一句话：虽然中国不换党，但政策会变；而美国在民主/共和之间换党，但政策不变。
@tigading2177
It's all about choices, Americans choose their brand of "freedom and democracy and we must defend their rights to have complete "freedom", we must ensure they continue to vote/elect to replace Red with Blue or Blue with Red party, whatever. Let them be. It is fun to watch.
这一切都与选择有关，美国人选择了他们的"自由和民主"，我们必须捍卫他们拥有完全"自由"的权利，我们必须确保他们继续投票/选举，以蓝党取代红党，或以红党取代蓝党，随便。随他们去吧。这很有趣。
@CobraQuotes1
it's NOT just a large population because we have a large population, it's the quality of the population.
这不仅仅是因为我们人口众多，而是人口的质量问题。
@Alberto-xw8vx
It's the culture, it's the right one.
这是因为文化，正确的文化。
@ladygracienyc2029
@hengongchua6250
It's not helpful and also not true that one nation has a better culture than another. It's okay to criticize government but people are the same. You have good and bad in all countries.
一个国家的文化比另一个国家的文化更好，这种说法毫无帮助，也不符合事实。批评政府没问题，但人都是一样的，每个国家的人都有好有坏。
@MarkMiller304
@ladygracienyc2029 culture makes all the difference. One respects education and teachers, the other doesn’t. Where do you think these 2 different mindsets will lead in the long run?
The sooner you drop this political correctness and be honest with your failings the faster you’ll be able to fix your problems.
文化决定一切。一个尊重教育和教师，另一个则不尊重。从长远来看，您认为这两种不同的心态会导致什么结果？
越早放弃政治正确，坦诚面对自己的不足，就能越快地解决问题。
@carnut5691
Not only strategic long term planning, there is this support & trust in the government. Once a goal is set, they all move in the same direction.
中国不仅有战略性的长期规划，还有对政府的支持和信任。一旦确定了目标，大家就会朝着同一个方向前进。
@fool9111z
Not really. It is also very chaotic. But China has often been led and protected by very talented wise and patriotic elites, throughout history.
I think this quality of elites is the soul of a country and Chinese civilization.
其实不然，中国也很混乱。但纵观历史，中国常常被才华横溢、智慧和爱国的精英所领导和保护。
我认为这种精英品质是一个国家和中华文明的灵魂。
@john99776
@fool9111z But this is no accident. The type of governance allows these excellent elites to rise. In the US it's the opposite - good people are ignored and repressed by the system.
但这并非偶然，正是这种治理方式让这些优秀的精英得以崛起。而在美国，情况恰恰相反--优秀的人被制度忽视和压制。
@zaitinmak5671
China built their first overseas train in Saudi Arabia at a loss . And they gained a lot more projects from Saudi Arabia thereafter .
中国在亏损的情况下在沙特阿拉伯建造了第一列海外高铁。此后，他们从沙特获得了更多的项目。
@AlexanderTheGreat-f5r
The China Energy Engineering Corporation (CEEC) has signed an engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract to develop a 2 GW solar project in Saudi Arabia. The US$972m Haden solar project, will be built in western Saudi Arabia, 93 km northeast of Taif, Makkah province.20 Aug 2024
750 Chinese companies are currently operating in Saudi Arabia, contributing to major construction projects, including NEOM.
What are the China Harbour projects in Saudi Arabia?
In Saudi Arabia, CHEC has undertaken the construction of numerous large-scale projects, including the Jeddah Red Sea Gateway, Jazan Port, Yanbu Waterfront Park, Dammam Port, Jeddah JSDP Project, Jazan Dredging and Reclamation, Jazan Water Supply and Drainage, the artificial islands for the Saudi-Bahrain Causeway
中国能源工程集团公司（CEEC）签署了一份工程、采购和施工（EPC）合同，将在沙特阿拉伯开发一个2 GW的太阳能项目。这个耗资9.72亿美元的Haden太阳能项目将建在沙特阿拉伯西部，麦加省塔伊夫东北93公里处。
目前有750家中国公司在沙特阿拉伯开展业务，为包括NEOM在内的大型建设项目做出了贡献。
沙特阿拉伯有哪些中国项目？
在沙特阿拉伯，中国能源工程集团公司（CEEC）承建了许多大型项目，包括吉达红海门户、贾赞港、延布海滨公园、达曼港、吉达JSDP项目、贾赞疏浚和填海、贾赞供水和排水、沙特-巴林堤道人工岛等。
@willengel2458
China didn't build the HS trains in Saudi Arabia. those are from Spain. the Spanish company wasn't able to build the railroads in the dessert, so they contracted it out to China. China built the rail road for the Saudis, not the HS trains.
西班牙公司没有能力在沙漠地区修建铁路，因此他们将工程承包给了中国，中国为沙特人修建的是铁路而不是高铁列车。
@Zopdoz
Long term thinking is ingrained in their culture, with that mindset, it's a definite win! The clear look into their history pretty much says it all. They've been at the top, for long, the century of humiliation was just a setback, so they're coming back with a bang.
长期思维在他们的文化中根深蒂固，有了这种心态，他们必胜无疑！回顾他们的历史，几乎可以说明一切。他们长期处于巅峰状态，百年屈辱不过是一次挫折，所以他们会一鼓作气，卷土重来。
@foodparadise5792
This boils down to the type of civilization. China is the only surviving ancient agricultural civilization which requires collectivism(for land cultivation, fertilization, and harvest) and patient(you always make seasonal planning for seeding)... where nomads were more opportunistic, come and go, grab what ever along the path.
China was the biggest economy most of the time in the world for the last 2500-ish years since the establishment of the silk road. "The rise of China" isn't correct, should be the return of China.
这可以归结为文明的类型。中国是唯一现存的古代农业文明，需要集体主义（耕种土地、施肥和收获）和耐心（总是要制定季节性播种计划）......而游牧民族更多的是机会主义，他们来了就走，沿路什么都抢。
自丝绸之路建立以来的约2500年间，中国在大多数时候都是世界上最大的经济体，说中国崛起"并不正确”，应该是"中国回归"。
@pierreshi6102
Yes. Do note that tea, silk, and China were massively profitable technologies stolen by outsiders. Also, during the Song dynasty, China had anywhere from 50% to 90% of the global GDP. Us Chinese have always preferred peace and planning compared to the nomadic rob and run and warring.
是的。请注意，茶叶、丝绸和瓷器都是被外人窃取的利润丰厚的技术。此外，在宋朝，中国的国内生产总值占全球的50%至90%。与游牧民族的抢掠和战争相比，我们中国人一直更喜欢和平与规划。
@badimpulses17
All the haters always say China copy and they dont innovate. These people are so ignorant they never leave their bubble.
所有讨厌中国的人总是说中国抄袭，他们没有创新，这些人太无知了，他们从未离开过自己的泡泡。
@MarcoMasseria
Does it matter? How much advancement is actually coming? Flying cars? EV vehicles?
Making stuff matters much more (doing) than having ideas (thinking).
这重要吗？到底有多少进步即将到来？飞行汽车？电动汽车？制造东西（行动）比拥有想法（思考）更重要。
@AlexanderTheGreat-f5r
Who says China is not innovating ?
Take a look at this.
China is far ahead of other countries in generative AI inventions like chatbots, filing six times more patents than its closest rival the United States.
China leads the world with 38,210 inventions, far surpassing the U.S. (6,276)
谁说中国没有创新？
来看看这个。
中国在聊天机器人等生成式人工智能方面遥遥领先于其他国家，中国申请的专利数量是其最接近的竞争对手美国的六倍。
中国以38210项发明居世界首位，远远超过美国（6276项）。
@stephenlock7236
That observation about the short term thinking of the US is very true. That actually makes the US a very unreliable and untrustworthy partner in any treaty or agreement. And this is not a theoretical situation. There is a long list of treaties and agreements which the US has unilaterally withdrew once the incumbent were kicked out of office.
关于美国短期思维的看法非常正确，这实际上使得美国在任何条约或协议中都是一个非常不可靠和不可信任的伙伴。这并不是理论上的情况，有一长串的条约和协议是美国在执政者被赶下台后单方面撤销的。
@kaahzvi5820
It is painfully obvious in their foreign policies. Close allies like Canada, Western Europe, etc has to grapple with and reorientate in the Trump era.
这在他们的外交政策中表现得非常明显，加拿大、西欧等亲密盟友必须在特朗普时代努力应对并调整方向。
@borinvlogs
China is already decades ahead of US, EU and pretty much other countries in many areas. 90% of world's solar is in China, 90% of world's highest railway (bullet trains) are in China, 90% of world's top rarest minerals are controlled by China. China also has 400x ship building capacity than US which is just mind blowing.
中国在许多领域已经领先美国、欧盟和几乎所有其他国家数十年。世界上90%的太阳能在中国，世界上90%的高速铁路（子弹头列车）在中国，世界上90%的稀土矿产由中国控制。中国的造船能力也是美国的400倍，这简直令人震惊。
@judywu5514
Because Chinese work hard and when China respect other country's own will and help it to develop ,not like America and West countries just to exploit it and get thing they want and left mess
因为中国人勤劳，而且中国尊重其他国家的意愿，帮助它们发展，而不是像美国和西方国家那样剥削其他国家，在得到他们想要的东西后留下一片混乱。
@MichaelBurggraf-gm8vl
An important aspect is in many Asian countries their attitude towards learning. I think that this is similarly important as strategic planning.
一个重要的方面是许多亚洲国家对学习的态度，我认为这与战略规划同样重要。
@CCY-hx2hr
Many Chinese refer to themselves as ‘读书人’, which directly translates to ‘book reader’, but its true meaning is closer to ‘scholar’. The Chinese culture places great importance on studying and education.
许多中国人称自己为"读书人"，直译为"读书的人"，但其真正含义更接近于"学者"。中国文化非常重视学习和教育。
@yaqiwang5242
In US surprisingly lots of people think high education is not needed or not worthwhile partly due to high tuition rates. They don’t realize high education can give you more opportunities, open your mind by meeting people and force you to think hard problems, etc. Culture influences shaping people’s perceptions are also important.
在美国，令人惊讶的是很多人认为不需要或不值得接受高等教育，部分原因是高昂的学费。他们没有意识到高等教育能给你带来更多机会，通过与人交往打开你的心扉，迫使你思考棘手的问题等。影响人们观念的文化因素也很重要。
@CCY-hx2hr
@yaqiwang5242 in China culture, to be a ‘book reader’ is a big honor.
I felt same as the west call someone ‘knight’.
在中国文化中，能成为"读书人"是一种莫大的荣耀。
我的感觉就像西方人称某人为"骑士"一样。
@horridohobbies
I always say that China plays weiqi (or go), while the United States plays tic-tac-toe.
Weiqi is all about long-term strategy. Tic-tac-toe is only about very short-term tactics.
我常说中国人玩围棋，而美国玩井字棋。
围棋讲究长期战略，而井字棋只讲究短期战术。
@sunnytalks203
@horridohobbies weiqi is the most difficult board game, for chess, it may take 1 hour or so to finish the game, weiqi takes minimum 4 hours or more to finish the game
围棋是最难的棋类游戏，下国际象棋可能要1个小时左右才能下完，而下围棋至少要4个小时以上才能下完。
@Seicks
I think Europe is actually in the worst situation. At least the USA know where their short time interests are. European leaders can't even plan that. Completely paralyzed.
我认为欧洲的情况其实最糟糕，至少美国知道他们的短期利益在哪里，而欧洲领导人甚至无法制定计划，它们完全瘫痪了。
@jameslum8822
Western Europe is resource poor. Miserable decades on the horizon.
西欧资源贫乏，悲惨的几十年即将到来。
@tigading2177
@jameslum8822 That is just natural order of things, W.Europe has long standing history and culture of theft, l00ting, ge no side of natives all over the world, which led them to rapid industrialization, carbon emitters, enormous wealth to fuel ever increasing economic terrorism/sanction on others etc. Now that all their wealth is squandered or tucked away in some off shore accts by American oligarchs with multiple passports. The USUK led west is well on its back to Dickensian era.
这只是自然规律，西欧有着悠久的历史和文化，对全世界的土著进行盗窃、抢劫和掠夺，这使他们迅速实现了工业化，成为碳排放国，拥有了巨额财富，为日益增长的经济恐怖主义/对他国的制裁提供了燃料。现在，他们所有的财富都被持有多种护照的美国寡头挥霍或藏匿在一些离岸账户中。英美领导的西方国家正在向狄更斯时代迈进。
@barrywong4327
Well, the Chinese civilization has thrived for 4000+ years with ups and downs. More ups than downs. It has developed a culture of long-term thinking, patience, resiliency and pragmatism. People will make sacrifices without complaints knowing the future will be better, even if they themselves may not see that future themselves.
The American culture is one of instant gratification. Americans have no idea what tough times mean. They’re accustomed to living large and living for the moment. They have no idea what tough times really mean.
The American system is seriously flawed in many ways. The most fatal one is the fact that the system promotes incompetent, short-sighted, narrow-minded crooks as leaders. They talk large, give beautiful speeches, promise the world but they don’t deliver.
China will continue to grow in its influence and contributions to humanity. For its part, the US will continue to shrink in contrast. It is inevitable.
好吧，中华文明在跌宕起伏中繁荣了4000多年，起多于落，它已经形成了一种长期思考、耐心、坚韧和务实的文化。人们会毫无怨言地做出牺牲，因为他们知道未来会更好，即使他们自己可能看不到那个未来。
美国文化是一种急功近利的文化，美国人不知道艰难时期意味着什么，他们习惯于过着奢侈的生活，活在当下。他们不知道艰难时期的真正含义。
美国的制度在许多方面都存在严重的缺陷，其中最致命的一点是这种制度推举无能、目光短浅、心胸狭隘的骗子担任领导人。他们夸夸其谈，发表漂亮的演讲，向全世界许下承诺，但却不能兑现。
中国将继续增强其对人类的影响力和贡献，而美国则将继续萎缩，这是不可避免的。
@MichaelZhuang
BYD sold more than half a million in October alone, their annual sale is way above 2 millions, more like 5 millions.
比亚迪仅在10月份就售出了50多万辆汽车，其年销量远远超过200万辆，更接近500万辆。
@bearpolo3618
It took BYD 15 years to build its first 5 million cars, and it only took 15 months to build the 2nd 5 million cars.
比亚迪用15年时间生产了第一批500万辆汽车，而生产第二批500万辆汽车只用了15个月。
@JD-yz4kr
US domestic policy may be on a four-year cycle, but not its foreign policy. US foreign policy has bi-partisan support in the government. Regardless of whether it is a Democrat or a Republican is in charge, the military-industrial complex is in charge.
美国的国内政策可能以四年为一个周期，但外交政策并非如此。美国的外交政策得到政府两党的支持，不管是民主党还是共和党掌权，军工复合体都说了算。
@Wecareus
Thank you for bringing an outsider perspective from Portugal. Unfortunately videos similar to this one is indeed the excuse for politicians and media to try everything, no matter how low and insidious, to stop China’s development.
感谢你从葡萄牙带来的局外人视角，遗憾的是类似的视频确实是政客和媒体千方百计阻止中国发展的借口，无论这些手段是多么卑鄙和阴险。
@rdzhang
I have been living in the US for over 30 years. The key difference between China and US is the quality of high school education. Plus self-discipline. Many American people love freedom but no self-discipline. The American public schools are totally failed. Chinese people are working much harder than American peers.
我在美国生活了30多年。中国和美国的主要区别在于高中教育的质量，还有自律。很多美国人热爱自由，但不自律。美国的公立学校完全失败了，中国人比美国的同龄人更努力。
@你我-k7e
Freedom and self-discipline are not opposites! Freedom is inherent to human nature, while self-discipline relies on cultivation through experience. Only those who practice self-discipline truly understand what freedom means. As the ancient Chinese saying goes: Do not impose on others what you yourself do not desire!
自由和自律不是对立的！自由是人类的天性，自律依赖后天的培养，只有自律的人才知道什么是真正的自由，中国有句古话，己所不欲，勿施于人！
@bizhope007
Freedom without self discipline is doomed to fail and we can see the results, drug abuse, depression, confusion, lack of self control, lack of common decencies and respect for others... and the list goes on.. sadly.��
没有自律的自由是注定要失败的，我们可以看到其结果：吸毒、抑郁、混乱、缺乏自控力、缺乏礼仪和对他人的尊重......这样的例子不胜枚举......令人痛心。
