17国拟成立“反制裁联盟”
2021-03-16 jiangye111 1567
正文翻译
Belarus, China, Cuba, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Syria & Venezuela and others create “The Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the United Nations” to promote “legality over force.”

白俄罗斯、中国、古巴、厄立特里亚、伊朗、朝鲜、俄罗斯、叙利亚和委内瑞拉等国成立了“捍卫联合国宪章之友小组”,以促进“法治高于武力”。
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处




(此举一改过去各国面对美国等西方国家频频举起的“制裁大棒”时,只能忍受+口头抗议的被动状况,迈出了被制裁各国主动抱团对抗制裁的第一步,堪称一次觉醒。)



(17国发起的“反制裁大联盟”倡议书。)

评论翻译
elBottoo
Its about a group of 16 pushing against the unilateral use of sanctions (mostly by the US). They argue that unilateral sanctions are against the spirit of the UN, aka you should only be able to place sanctions through the UN or security council.
Sounds reasonable to me.

这是一个由16国组成的集团,旨在反对(要由美国实施的)单边制裁。它们认为单边制裁违背了联合国的精神,也就是说,你只能通过联合国或安理会实施制裁。
听起来很合理。

SinoBot1949
Beware NATO, we are coming for you, Remember Yugoslavia, Libya, and Iraq.

当心北约——“我们正在赶到”,别忘了南斯拉夫、利比亚和伊拉克的下场。

BrothFuel
List of Based Countries.

这是发起国列表。

we-the-eastChinese (HK)
We need more.

我们还需要更多会员。

BrothFuel
I would think any none european or euro dominated country (like japan or south korea) would want to get in on this. Especially africa.

我认为任何一个非欧洲或欧元主导的国家(比如日本或韩国)都想参与进来。特别是非洲。

dwiezal
your mistake was thinking japan and SK arent dominated by european and american interests

你的错误在于认为日本和韩国没有被欧洲和美国的利益所控制

BrothFuel
I phrased it weirdly but thats what i meant, that SK and Japan are controlled by European influence.

我说得可能很奇怪,但这就是我的意思,韩国和日本被欧洲的影响所控制(所以它们想加入这个联盟以摆脱控制)。

derp-herpum
An actual anti-defamation league

一个真正的反诽谤联盟

flesh_eating_turtle
Good to see, though I wonder why Vietnam isn't included.

很高兴看到,不过我想知道为什么越南没有包括在内。

d32123
Vietnam is still deep in its detente period with the West, but I'm sure they will become a bigger target once they start to become an economic peer competitor like China is as long as they remain socialist.

因为越南仍处于与西方的缓和时期,但我相信,只要他们仍然是社会主义国家,一旦他们开始像中国一样成为西方的经济竞争对手,他们就会成为更大的目标。

Emirique175
be prepared, QUAD, Five Eyes and NATO

做好迎战准备——四国联盟、五眼、北约来袭

haekz
Ok let's see :
The countries that are signing this are,
Belarus, North Korea , Algeria, China, Cuba, Iran, Erithrea, Russia, Cambodia, Syria
And what do these countries have in common ?
They're.the flagships of democracy and power to the people !
So why would you trust a cohort of countries blatantly disregarding the basic rights of their people, purposefully sabotaging them and lacking any sense of justice, countries whose government oppress and murder and steal wealth and are basically scum on this earth to have any good idea ?
It's like shark talking about the virtue of becoming vegetarian.

好的,让我们看看:
签署协议的国家有,
白俄罗斯,朝鲜,阿尔及利亚,中国,古巴,伊朗,厄立特里亚,俄罗斯,柬埔寨,叙利亚
这些国家有什么共同点呢?
它们是人民民主和权力的旗帜!(反讽)
所以你为什么要相信一群公然……的国家,它们的政府……,基本上是地球上的XX,它们能有什么好的理念?(译注:日常抹黑)
这就像一群鲨鱼在谈论素食的好处一样。

louaionlyyandoneAlgiers
I dont but I also dont trust the USA which is shown to use sanctions against any raising power that it sees as a threat to its domination so yeah a country being corrupt is better than a country being corrupt and having economic crises

我不相信,但我也不相信美国,因为美国对任何崛起的国家都会进行制裁,只要它认为这些国家会威胁到它的统治地位,所以一个腐败的国家总比一个腐败的且发生经济危机的国家要好

IRainstorm
I will take a world ruled by USA over China any day

我永远都会选择被美国统治,而不是中国

Deli1181Constantine
You put "anti-imperialism" in quotes in the title, but I don't see that anywhere in the source. Who said this is anti-imperial?
Either way, the title made it sound like something to look forward to but as soon as I saw the other countries involved you can tell it's just empty political theatrics.
Kick Russia and China out and we can talk. Not that the rest are role models but at least they can get benefit of doubt.
Unless the US, China, Russia, France, and UK are willing to do away with the permanent "veto" they have in UN, then the UN will forever remain a farce.

你在标题中引用了“反帝国主义”,但我在链接中没有看到这个词。谁说这个联盟是在反帝国主义?
不管怎样,这个标题让它听起来像是一件值得期待的事情,但当我看到其他国家参与进来时,你可以看出这只是一场空洞的政治闹剧。
把俄罗斯和中国踢出去,然后我们再谈什么“反帝国主义”。并不是说剩下的国家都是榜样,但至少它们符合无罪推定。
除非美国、中国、俄罗斯、法国和英国愿意废除它们在联合国拥有的永久“否决权”,否则联合国将永远只是一场闹剧。

bigusdickusalgerus
Thanks buddy I didn't notice that. We all know that most of these countries are China/Russia satellites kicking them won't make a difference. And yes the UN security council veto contradicts the reason behind the UN.

谢谢,伙计,我没注意到。我们都知道这些国家大多是亲中国和俄罗斯的,所以把它们踢出去不会有什么区别。没错,联合国安理会的否决权与联合国的宗旨相矛盾。

SomeSoulinLimbo
most of the members (whether good or bad in some eyes) were affected by western sanctions at some point mostly US ones. the members are: Algeria, Angola, Belarus, Bolivia, Cambodia, China, Cuba, Eritrea, Iran, Laos, Nicaragua, North Korea, Russia, Saint Vincent, and the Grenadines, Syria, Venezuela, and the Palestinians.
The group said in a letter dated Wednesday it will "strive to preserve, promote and defend the prence and validity of the UN Charter ... while providing a platform for, among others promoting the prence of legality over force ..."
It called for dialogue, tolerance, and solidarity, adding these are at the core of international relations and remain vital for the peaceful coexistence among nations.
The move comes amid US President Joe Biden's efforts to shift American foreign policy towards multilateralism from his predecessor Donald Trump's "America First" stance

大多数成员国(不管有些人认为它们是好还是坏)都受到了西方制裁的影响,主要是美国的制裁。成员国包括:阿尔及利亚、安哥拉、白俄罗斯、玻利维亚、柬埔寨、中国、古巴、厄立特里亚、伊朗、老挝、尼加拉瓜、朝鲜、俄罗斯、圣文森特和格林纳丁斯、叙利亚、委内瑞拉和巴勒斯坦。
该组织在日期为周三的信函中表示,将“努力维护、促进和捍卫《联合国宪章》的普遍性和有效性……同时在其他联合国平台之外又提供了一个平台,提倡法治胜过武力……”
它呼吁对话、宽容和团结,并补充说,这些是国际关系的核心,对国家间和平共处仍然至关重要。
此举正值美国总统乔·拜登努力将美国外交政策从其前任唐纳德·特朗普的“美国优先”立场转向多边主义之际

SexyTaftLibertarian Stalinist 39
It’s an interesting development in the wake of the Biden administration’s clear intentions to maintain and expand the US economic and literal warfare across the globe, and may be a signal of the beginning of the end of 30 years of unopposed American marauding. Thought it might be worth discussing

在拜登政府明确意图维持并扩大美国在全球范围内的经济和真正战争之后,这是一个有趣的事态发展,可能是一个信号,标志着30年来无人敢对抗美国掠夺的情况开始终结。我觉得值得讨论一下

EngelsDanglesMarxist-Parentiist
It calls out American hypocrisy but I think that Russia, China, and Iran being involved (all of who aren't strictly following UN rulings and process) means it will just be ignored.

这个联盟指出了美国的伪善,但我认为俄罗斯、中国和伊朗(所有这些国家都没有严格遵守联合国的规则和程序)的参与意味着该联盟将被忽视。

idoubtithinki
I can imagine perhaps Russia and China ignoring UN rulings atm (though even there I can't think specifics off the top of my head) but how is Iran ignoring it at this very moment?

我可以想象俄罗斯和中国可能会无视联合国的裁决(尽管我怎么都想不出有过那个具体案例),但伊朗怎么会在这个时候无视它呢?

ItsoktobeStalinist
Anti Anglo Action!
Their reign is about to end! Anyone who sides with them must be treated as the enemies of humanity, if they haven't learned so far after all these years they never will!

反盎格鲁行动!
他们的统治就要结束了!任何站在他们一边的人都必须被视为人类的敌人,如果他们这么多年来还没有认识到,那他们就永远不会意识到了!

原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


Ben Norton
This group was created to defend international law and oppose unilateral, murderous US sanctions and military aggressions, which are criminal

这个组织的成立是为了捍卫国际法,反对美国单方面的、残忍的制裁和军事侵略——这些都是犯罪行为

N0ghl
Weird how these countries won't just lie down and accept the American boot on their backs.
After all, it's only bad to make a global pact when the US isn't part of it, Right?

奇怪的是,这些国家怎么不躺下来接受美国的靴子踩脸。
毕竟,在美国不参与的情况下签订全球协议都是坏的,对吧?

Mark Bar
It is actually a very good idea to make global pacts that do not include or actively do not rely on the United States. Notorious for breaking treaties.

实际上,制定不包括或不积极依赖美国的全球协定是一个非常好的主意。美国因违反条约而臭名昭著。

Axel Heist
This letter proves that the U.N. isn't working - it's useless for keeping the peace. The major powers ignore it. The letter will only make the self-important in Washington hot under the collar. The only good that could come of it is if enough nations signed it to start a new U.N.

这封发起信证明联合国没有发挥作用——它对维持和平毫无用处。主要大国根本无视它。这封信只会让华盛顿那些妄自尊大的人怒不可遏。唯一能带来的好处是,有足够多的国家签署该协议,然后成立一个新的联合国

AdeptVeritatis
The Charter of the UN is about nation to nation relationships. It has pretty little to do with the populations.
In diplomacy there is no such thing as obscenity as not a single country has the same political system like another. How the people are treated is irrelevant.

联合国宪章是关于国家间关系的。与人口数量没什么关系。
在外交上没有所谓的“肮脏”,因为没有一个国家的政治制度与另一个国家相同。人们被如何对待是无关紧要的。

h
invading iraq was an obscenity.
hopefully this will help stop that type of crime from happening again.
but if you US freaks are so offended by international law then it probably wont stop you from destroying anything you feel like at all

当年入侵伊拉克是卑鄙的行为。
希望这个联盟将有助于阻止这类犯罪行为再次发生。
但是,如果你们这些美国怪胎如此违反国际法,那么这可能不会阻止你们摧毁任何你想摧毁的东西

原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


很赞 0
收藏