释放强大火力：中国054B型护卫舰实弹射击震撼展示！
正文翻译
The Chinese PLA Navy published a dramatic video showing the newly commissioned Type 054B frigate, the Luohe, live firing at sea.
中国人民解放军海军发布了一段引人注目的视频，展示了新服役的054B型护卫舰“洛河号”在海上实弹射击的画面。
The Chinese PLA Navy published a dramatic video showing the newly commissioned Type 054B frigate, the Luohe, live firing at sea.
中国人民解放军海军发布了一段引人注目的视频，展示了新服役的054B型护卫舰“洛河号”在海上实弹射击的画面。
评论翻译
@etow8034
One Type 054B frigate can sink the entire Royal Canadian Navy ...sad, but true !
一艘054B型护卫舰就能击沉整个加拿大皇家海军……令人遗憾，但却是事实！
One Type 054B frigate can sink the entire Royal Canadian Navy ...sad, but true !
一艘054B型护卫舰就能击沉整个加拿大皇家海军……令人遗憾，但却是事实！
@yndiiatecow2536
Hey you. What are you talking about. There is no Canadian Navy only U.S. Navy, Canada is the 51st state of America. Got that
嘿，你在说什么？根本没有什么加拿大海军，只有美国海军，加拿大就是美国的第51个州，明白了吗？
Hey you. What are you talking about. There is no Canadian Navy only U.S. Navy, Canada is the 51st state of America. Got that
嘿，你在说什么？根本没有什么加拿大海军，只有美国海军，加拿大就是美国的第51个州，明白了吗？
@jcancino630
@yndiiatecow2536 lMao straight to the yugular
@yndiiatecow2536 笑死了，直击要害。
@yndiiatecow2536 lMao straight to the yugular
@yndiiatecow2536 笑死了，直击要害。
@ltrond
Nah... That's a little too much. 054B is for anti-submarine and low intensity missions, it can't lauch long range anti-ship missles.
不，这有点夸张了，054B主要用于反潜和低强度任务，无法发射远程反舰导弹。
Nah... That's a little too much. 054B is for anti-submarine and low intensity missions, it can't lauch long range anti-ship missles.
不，这有点夸张了，054B主要用于反潜和低强度任务，无法发射远程反舰导弹。
@MohajonFromEast
Even Canada has a navy these days? Learning something new everyday.
现在连加拿大都有海军了吗？每天都能学到新知识呢。
Even Canada has a navy these days? Learning something new everyday.
现在连加拿大都有海军了吗？每天都能学到新知识呢。
@RadicalFloat_95
I actually genuinely agree with you @MohajonFromEast
我真的完全同意你的看法 @MohajonFromEast
I actually genuinely agree with you @MohajonFromEast
我真的完全同意你的看法 @MohajonFromEast
@shawnmen9805
wait... Canada has a Navy?
等等……加拿大有海军吗？
wait... Canada has a Navy?
等等……加拿大有海军吗？
@etow8034
@shawnmen9805 LMao ...yeah the newest ships are the 12x City Class frigates commissioned between 1992 and 1996 which makes them 29-33 years old. Non of them have VLS. One Type 054B alone has 32 VLS which means there are 2-3 missiles marked for the entire Canadian surface combatant fleet !
@shawnmen9805 哈哈哈，是啊，最新的舰艇是1992年到1996年间服役的12艘城市级护卫舰，意味着这些舰艇已经有29到33年的船龄了，而且它们没有垂直发射系统，而一艘054B型护卫舰单独就配备了32个垂直发射单元，也就是说，给加拿大整个水面舰队每艘分配2到3枚！
@shawnmen9805 LMao ...yeah the newest ships are the 12x City Class frigates commissioned between 1992 and 1996 which makes them 29-33 years old. Non of them have VLS. One Type 054B alone has 32 VLS which means there are 2-3 missiles marked for the entire Canadian surface combatant fleet !
@shawnmen9805 哈哈哈，是啊，最新的舰艇是1992年到1996年间服役的12艘城市级护卫舰，意味着这些舰艇已经有29到33年的船龄了，而且它们没有垂直发射系统，而一艘054B型护卫舰单独就配备了32个垂直发射单元，也就是说，给加拿大整个水面舰队每艘分配2到3枚！
@Amidat
what's sad about it? Canada should have no reason to fight China... As long as Canada doesn't follow the US in picking a fight with China - Canada should have nothing to be sad about
这有什么可悲的呢？加拿大没有理由与中国对抗，只要加拿大不跟随美国挑衅中国，那么加拿大就不应该有任何值得悲伤的地方。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
what's sad about it? Canada should have no reason to fight China... As long as Canada doesn't follow the US in picking a fight with China - Canada should have nothing to be sad about
这有什么可悲的呢？加拿大没有理由与中国对抗，只要加拿大不跟随美国挑衅中国，那么加拿大就不应该有任何值得悲伤的地方。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@etow8034
@Amidat The silly beaver is in the South China Seas ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4yUXcMIz3U&t=11s
@Amidat 傻乎乎的海狸居然跑到南海去了！
@Amidat The silly beaver is in the South China Seas ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4yUXcMIz3U&t=11s
@Amidat 傻乎乎的海狸居然跑到南海去了！
@SUN-w4g
@ltrond If necessary, the 054B can also carry anti-ship missiles and perform tasks independently. It's just that in China's naval sequence, it is generally not the turn of 054B to take on this task, but it is not impossible
@ltrond 如果有必要，054B完全可以搭载反舰导弹并独立执行任务，只不过在中国海军的序列中通常轮不到054B，但这并不意味着它无法完成这样的任务。
@ltrond If necessary, the 054B can also carry anti-ship missiles and perform tasks independently. It's just that in China's naval sequence, it is generally not the turn of 054B to take on this task, but it is not impossible
@ltrond 如果有必要，054B完全可以搭载反舰导弹并独立执行任务，只不过在中国海军的序列中通常轮不到054B，但这并不意味着它无法完成这样的任务。
@gumpyoldbugger6944
Well considering our Halifax class frigates were designed in the 80's mainly for anti Soviet submarine work, and that the youngest of them, the HMCS Ville de Québec, launched on May 16, 1991, is now approximately 33 years old, so that's not too surprising they are out classed by the PLAN's newest Type 054B frigates.
However, our new River class destroyer, which is basically a Canadianized version of the British BEA Type-26 frigate should be on par with the best the PlAN's frigates.
考虑到加拿大的哈利法克斯级护卫舰是在20世纪80年代设计的，主要是为了反制苏联的潜艇活动，而其中最年轻的一艘“魁北克城号”护卫舰是在1991年5月16日下水，如今已有大约33年的服役时间，因此被中国人民解放军最新的054B型护卫舰超越也并不意外。
不过，加拿大的新款“河”级驱逐舰实际上是英国产BAE Type-26护卫舰的本土化版本，性能应该可以与中国最新型护卫舰媲美。
Well considering our Halifax class frigates were designed in the 80's mainly for anti Soviet submarine work, and that the youngest of them, the HMCS Ville de Québec, launched on May 16, 1991, is now approximately 33 years old, so that's not too surprising they are out classed by the PLAN's newest Type 054B frigates.
However, our new River class destroyer, which is basically a Canadianized version of the British BEA Type-26 frigate should be on par with the best the PlAN's frigates.
考虑到加拿大的哈利法克斯级护卫舰是在20世纪80年代设计的，主要是为了反制苏联的潜艇活动，而其中最年轻的一艘“魁北克城号”护卫舰是在1991年5月16日下水，如今已有大约33年的服役时间，因此被中国人民解放军最新的054B型护卫舰超越也并不意外。
不过，加拿大的新款“河”级驱逐舰实际上是英国产BAE Type-26护卫舰的本土化版本，性能应该可以与中国最新型护卫舰媲美。
@gumpyoldbugger6944
@Amidat There is that.
@Amidat 是这样的。
@Amidat There is that.
@Amidat 是这样的。
@etow8034
@gumpyoldbugger6944 The youngest City Class frigate is the HMCS Ottawa commissioned in 1996. The River class frigates won't be in service till 2040 which by then will be obsolete against anything the PLAN has let alone a surface combatant like the Type 052 or Type 055. In all simulations so far the British BEA Type-26 frigates are no match for the Type 052 let alone the Type 055 !
@ gumpyoldbugger6944 年纪最小的City级护卫舰是1996年服役的HMCS Ottawa，而River级护卫舰要到2040年才能服役，到那时候它们与中国海军的任何装备相比都会过时，更不用说与诸如052型或055型这样的水面战舰较量了。目前所有的模拟结果表明，英国BAE公司研发的26型护卫舰在性能上无法与052型抗衡，更不用说055型了。
@gumpyoldbugger6944 The youngest City Class frigate is the HMCS Ottawa commissioned in 1996. The River class frigates won't be in service till 2040 which by then will be obsolete against anything the PLAN has let alone a surface combatant like the Type 052 or Type 055. In all simulations so far the British BEA Type-26 frigates are no match for the Type 052 let alone the Type 055 !
@ gumpyoldbugger6944 年纪最小的City级护卫舰是1996年服役的HMCS Ottawa，而River级护卫舰要到2040年才能服役，到那时候它们与中国海军的任何装备相比都会过时，更不用说与诸如052型或055型这样的水面战舰较量了。目前所有的模拟结果表明，英国BAE公司研发的26型护卫舰在性能上无法与052型抗衡，更不用说055型了。
@brightfrost
Words can't describe how pretty this ship is!
言语难以形容这艘船的美丽！
Words can't describe how pretty this ship is!
言语难以形容这艘船的美丽！
@gumpyoldbugger6944
yup....she is a looker alright.
嗯，她确实很有魅力。
yup....she is a looker alright.
嗯，她确实很有魅力。
@gumpyoldbugger6944
The Chinese should do build some very pretty warships, I love the hue of their gray paint, reminds a bit of the hue used by the RNC.
中国应该造一些非常漂亮的军舰，我很喜欢他们灰色涂装的色调，有点让我想起美国共和党全国委员会使用的颜色。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The Chinese should do build some very pretty warships, I love the hue of their gray paint, reminds a bit of the hue used by the RNC.
中国应该造一些非常漂亮的军舰，我很喜欢他们灰色涂装的色调，有点让我想起美国共和党全国委员会使用的颜色。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Bob-wh6qr
Good stuff.
不错的内容
Good stuff.
不错的内容
@pooyasafaei2538
DID the 2nd Type 054B enter service? Along the 27th type 052D????
第二艘054B型护卫舰是否已经服役？与第27艘052D型驱逐舰同时吗？
DID the 2nd Type 054B enter service? Along the 27th type 052D????
第二艘054B型护卫舰是否已经服役？与第27艘052D型驱逐舰同时吗？
@williamho1976
Like who cares? They are just Temu ships of crappy quality.
谁会在意呢？它们只是一些质量很差的Temu船而已。
Like who cares? They are just Temu ships of crappy quality.
谁会在意呢？它们只是一些质量很差的Temu船而已。
@pooyasafaei2538
@williamho1976 what ship is not temu quality in ur opinion? Not like i care but dont u mean 40 out of 70 arleigh burkes with a mean age of 40 years
你认为哪艘军舰的质量不符合Temu的标准？虽然我并不在意，但你是不是指70艘阿利·伯克级驱逐舰中有40艘，平均服役年龄达到了40年？
@williamho1976 what ship is not temu quality in ur opinion? Not like i care but dont u mean 40 out of 70 arleigh burkes with a mean age of 40 years
你认为哪艘军舰的质量不符合Temu的标准？虽然我并不在意，但你是不是指70艘阿利·伯克级驱逐舰中有40艘，平均服役年龄达到了40年？
@pooyasafaei2538
Did 36th type 052D got launched too?
第36艘052D型驱逐舰也下水了吗？
Did 36th type 052D got launched too?
第36艘052D型驱逐舰也下水了吗？
@alvinluo150
@williamho1976 lMao, you get what you pay for. Pay less? get shit, Pay more? you get better shit
@williamho1976 哈哈，真是钱多钱少决定品质，花钱少就只能得到差的东西，花钱多才能得到好一点的东西。
@williamho1976 lMao, you get what you pay for. Pay less? get shit, Pay more? you get better shit
@williamho1976 哈哈，真是钱多钱少决定品质，花钱少就只能得到差的东西，花钱多才能得到好一点的东西。
@taemer7435
@alvinluo150 Not necessarily true, inflated labour costs and lack of efficiency from economies of scale can make production in one country be much higher than the other for the same quality (I'm not claiming that quality of US vessels vs Chinese are equal). Not to mention the disproportionate political (in)efficiencies and lobbying that goes into some military projects for the USA.
@alvinluo150 不一定正确，劳动成本的上涨以及规模经济效率的缺乏可能导致在同等质量的情况下，一个国家的生产成本远远高于另一个国家（我并不是说美国与中国船舶的质量是相等的）。更不用说美国一些军事项目中存在的不合理政治效率以及游说活动对成本的影响。
@alvinluo150 Not necessarily true, inflated labour costs and lack of efficiency from economies of scale can make production in one country be much higher than the other for the same quality (I'm not claiming that quality of US vessels vs Chinese are equal). Not to mention the disproportionate political (in)efficiencies and lobbying that goes into some military projects for the USA.
@alvinluo150 不一定正确，劳动成本的上涨以及规模经济效率的缺乏可能导致在同等质量的情况下，一个国家的生产成本远远高于另一个国家（我并不是说美国与中国船舶的质量是相等的）。更不用说美国一些军事项目中存在的不合理政治效率以及游说活动对成本的影响。
@masnur7007
@williamho1976 ... Yet you're having TEMU TREMORS, duh! No?
@williamho1976 ... 你却因为TEMU船而紧张得发抖，不是吗？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@williamho1976 ... Yet you're having TEMU TREMORS, duh! No?
@williamho1976 ... 你却因为TEMU船而紧张得发抖，不是吗？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@laowantongchau
@williamho1976 Chinese warships are not equipped with autopilot to crash cargo ships for sure, unlike your master's naval ships which are all capable with the option
@williamho1976 中国军舰当然没有装备自动驾驶功能来撞货船，不像你主子的海军舰艇都配有这种选项 /笑哭哈哈
@williamho1976 Chinese warships are not equipped with autopilot to crash cargo ships for sure, unlike your master's naval ships which are all capable with the option
@williamho1976 中国军舰当然没有装备自动驾驶功能来撞货船，不像你主子的海军舰艇都配有这种选项 /笑哭哈哈
@Phunny
@williamho1976 The US Department of Defense, which is full of analysts who have accomplished far more than your entire bloodline ever will, does.
@williamho1976 美国国防部拥有众多分析专家，他们取得的成就远远超过你的整个家族将来的任何可能成就。
@williamho1976 The US Department of Defense, which is full of analysts who have accomplished far more than your entire bloodline ever will, does.
@williamho1976 美国国防部拥有众多分析专家，他们取得的成就远远超过你的整个家族将来的任何可能成就。
@Flightman453
The 2nd 054B has appeared to have entered service. For the 27th 052D, it possibly may have (looks to be DDG #166), but we'll have to see.
第二艘054B似乎已经服役，而第27艘052D可能也已经服役（看起来是166号驱逐舰），但还需要进一步确认。
The 2nd 054B has appeared to have entered service. For the 27th 052D, it possibly may have (looks to be DDG #166), but we'll have to see.
第二艘054B似乎已经服役，而第27艘052D可能也已经服役（看起来是166号驱逐舰），但还需要进一步确认。
@Team6OWG
@williamho1976 Cope
@williamho1976 自我安慰吧
@williamho1976 Cope
@williamho1976 自我安慰吧
@cabasadefogo9533
Curious will the PLAN make more 54b or will it be a testing version like 52C. And you end up with even better one. May be 54C or D
好奇中国海军是否会制造更多的054B型护卫舰还是会像052C那样出现某种测试版本，最终升级到更先进的型号，比如054C或054D。
Curious will the PLAN make more 54b or will it be a testing version like 52C. And you end up with even better one. May be 54C or D
好奇中国海军是否会制造更多的054B型护卫舰还是会像052C那样出现某种测试版本，最终升级到更先进的型号，比如054C或054D。
@Diligent_Movers
China's naval equipment is always built on the platform first, and then the equipment is gradually upxed. So I don't think there will be a finalized model. As long as there are new, mature, and deployable technologies, it will keep improving until the platform can no longer carry more new technologies
中国的海军装备通常是先搭建平台，然后再逐步更新相关设备，因此我认为不会有最终定型的型号，只要有新的成熟技术可以投入使用它就会不断升级，直到平台无法承载更多的新技术为止。
China's naval equipment is always built on the platform first, and then the equipment is gradually upxed. So I don't think there will be a finalized model. As long as there are new, mature, and deployable technologies, it will keep improving until the platform can no longer carry more new technologies
中国的海军装备通常是先搭建平台，然后再逐步更新相关设备，因此我认为不会有最终定型的型号，只要有新的成熟技术可以投入使用它就会不断升级，直到平台无法承载更多的新技术为止。
@fatdoi003
We don't know yet... Maybe later they want to install longer universal VLS so 054B will be transitional unit
我们目前还不知道……也许之后他们想要安装更长的通用垂直发射系统，那么054B可能会成为过渡型号。
We don't know yet... Maybe later they want to install longer universal VLS so 054B will be transitional unit
我们目前还不知道……也许之后他们想要安装更长的通用垂直发射系统，那么054B可能会成为过渡型号。
@gimme88
did they try to launch several of their anti ship missiles at one of their frigates armed with the "seawiz" phalanx system (or whatever it is called) - to see if it would stop the missiles?
他们是否曾尝试向装备有“密集阵”近防系统（或类似系统）的护卫舰发射多枚反舰导弹，以测试该系统是否能够拦截这些导弹？
did they try to launch several of their anti ship missiles at one of their frigates armed with the "seawiz" phalanx system (or whatever it is called) - to see if it would stop the missiles?
他们是否曾尝试向装备有“密集阵”近防系统（或类似系统）的护卫舰发射多枚反舰导弹，以测试该系统是否能够拦截这些导弹？
@LDZ_Repector99
Cool
很酷 /爱心
Cool
很酷 /爱心
@josephjun4688
The combat capability of 054B is closer to 052B
054B的作战能力更接近052B。
The combat capability of 054B is closer to 052B
054B的作战能力更接近052B。
@kwokholuk8723
052 is a destroyer. 054 is a frigate.
052是驱逐舰，054是护卫舰。
052 is a destroyer. 054 is a frigate.
052是驱逐舰，054是护卫舰。
@ex0duzz
Exactly his point?
他到底是想说什么？
Exactly his point?
他到底是想说什么？
@kumbackquatsta
jesus is impressed
耶稣感到震撼。
jesus is impressed
耶稣感到震撼。
@shengzhong2662
BGM有点熟，想不起来名字
背景音乐有点耳熟，但一时想不起名字。
BGM有点熟，想不起来名字
背景音乐有点耳熟，但一时想不起名字。
@Đờimitry
Damn, I was hoping to see live firing of the latest Chinese hypersonic missles or something..
真是遗憾，我原本希望能看到最新的中国高超音速导弹进行实弹发射之类的场面。
Damn, I was hoping to see live firing of the latest Chinese hypersonic missles or something..
真是遗憾，我原本希望能看到最新的中国高超音速导弹进行实弹发射之类的场面。
@mdmotaled3318
Chinese naval power world number one
中国海军力量已是世界第一。
Chinese naval power world number one
中国海军力量已是世界第一。
@kmwong1786
Now China needs to figure out a way to reload the missiles without making port.
现在中国需要想办法在不靠港的情况下重新装载导弹。
Now China needs to figure out a way to reload the missiles without making port.
现在中国需要想办法在不靠港的情况下重新装载导弹。
@니도끼가금도끼냐
There is a supply ship."
他们有一艘补给舰。
There is a supply ship."
他们有一艘补给舰。
@135e1f
@니도끼가금도끼냐 But it can't reload the VLS cells. For that the ship have to go back to port
但它无法重新装填垂直发射单元，为了做到这一点舰艇必须返回港口。
@니도끼가금도끼냐 But it can't reload the VLS cells. For that the ship have to go back to port
但它无法重新装填垂直发射单元，为了做到这一点舰艇必须返回港口。
@ZhaoHaiBuda
Lol you must be watching too much hollywood.
lol，你肯定是看太多好莱坞电影了吧。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Lol you must be watching too much hollywood.
lol，你肯定是看太多好莱坞电影了吧。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Flightman453
Not really. It's not like the US can do it either really nor do I think they'll be able to find a way to do it efficiently any time soon and at a larger scale. All of China's interests and goals are within their region; there's no need to try and gain this capability unless deemed fit. Too many people think China needs to emulate whatever the US is doing when that isn't the case.
不完全是这样，美国也未必能做到，我也不认为他们能在短期内找到高效且大规模实现的方法。中国的所有利益与目标都集中在自身区域内，除非被认为必要，否则没有必要去追求这样的能力。太多人以为中国需要模仿美国的一切，但事实并非如此。
Not really. It's not like the US can do it either really nor do I think they'll be able to find a way to do it efficiently any time soon and at a larger scale. All of China's interests and goals are within their region; there's no need to try and gain this capability unless deemed fit. Too many people think China needs to emulate whatever the US is doing when that isn't the case.
不完全是这样，美国也未必能做到，我也不认为他们能在短期内找到高效且大规模实现的方法。中国的所有利益与目标都集中在自身区域内，除非被认为必要，否则没有必要去追求这样的能力。太多人以为中国需要模仿美国的一切，但事实并非如此。
@Amidat
@Flightman453 exactly... China does not need to emulate the US
@Flightman453 没错，中国完全没必要效仿美国。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Flightman453 exactly... China does not need to emulate the US
@Flightman453 没错，中国完全没必要效仿美国。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@MarvelousSeven
Remember the time the Chinese Navy won a battle?
Like, ever?
你能想起中国海军曾经赢过任何一场战斗吗？比如。。。有过吗？
Remember the time the Chinese Navy won a battle?
Like, ever?
你能想起中国海军曾经赢过任何一场战斗吗？比如。。。有过吗？
@yangwang7201
So what? You want a battle, come and try!
那又怎样？想要较量的话，就来试试吧！
So what? You want a battle, come and try!
那又怎样？想要较量的话，就来试试吧！
@gumpyoldbugger6944
When was the last time they went to war??? A short land war against the Vietnamese back in the late 70's.
When was the last time the USN actually fought a peer navy? 1945 wasn't it? Apart from that all the USN has been doing is picking fights with smaller nations and conducting air strikes on relatively undefended areas.
The last western Navy to fight a naval battle with a near peer was the RN during the Falkands War, and although the RN won, it paid a fearful price. So don't get too complacent and self assured that the USN would fair well going up against the PLAN, especially in the PLAN's backyard.
上一次他们参战是什么时候？是在70年代末时与越南进行了一场短暂的陆地战争吧。
至于美国海军上一次真正与一个同等实力的海军交战是什么时候？是1945年不是吗？除此之外，美国海军基本上就在与较小国家挑起争端，或是在无法还手的地区进行空袭。
至于西方最后一次与近似实力的海军进行海战，则是英国皇家海军在马岛战争中。虽然英国最终取得了胜利，但付出了极大的代价。所以不要过于自满或自认为美国海军在与中国海军对抗时会异常顺利，尤其是在对方的势力范围内进行交战。
When was the last time they went to war??? A short land war against the Vietnamese back in the late 70's.
When was the last time the USN actually fought a peer navy? 1945 wasn't it? Apart from that all the USN has been doing is picking fights with smaller nations and conducting air strikes on relatively undefended areas.
The last western Navy to fight a naval battle with a near peer was the RN during the Falkands War, and although the RN won, it paid a fearful price. So don't get too complacent and self assured that the USN would fair well going up against the PLAN, especially in the PLAN's backyard.
上一次他们参战是什么时候？是在70年代末时与越南进行了一场短暂的陆地战争吧。
至于美国海军上一次真正与一个同等实力的海军交战是什么时候？是1945年不是吗？除此之外，美国海军基本上就在与较小国家挑起争端，或是在无法还手的地区进行空袭。
至于西方最后一次与近似实力的海军进行海战，则是英国皇家海军在马岛战争中。虽然英国最终取得了胜利，但付出了极大的代价。所以不要过于自满或自认为美国海军在与中国海军对抗时会异常顺利，尤其是在对方的势力范围内进行交战。
@yours_sincerely48
China should make a bigger destroyer that can launch DF 41...That is a game changer.
中国应该制造一艘可以发射东风41的大型驱逐舰，这将成为改变局势的关键。
China should make a bigger destroyer that can launch DF 41...That is a game changer.
中国应该制造一艘可以发射东风41的大型驱逐舰，这将成为改变局势的关键。
@Lin-eo5xu
I have a name for this kind of ship "Battledestroyer" just like "Battlecrusier" in the past.
我给这类舰船起了一个名字叫“战列驱逐舰”，就像过去的“战列巡洋舰”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I have a name for this kind of ship "Battledestroyer" just like "Battlecrusier" in the past.
我给这类舰船起了一个名字叫“战列驱逐舰”，就像过去的“战列巡洋舰”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@gelinrefira
That's call a nuclear sub.
那叫做核潜艇。
That's call a nuclear sub.
那叫做核潜艇。
@yours_sincerely48
@gelinrefira No way a Sub can carry such huge missile and the take off can send the sub to the bottom of ocean. A floating Destroyer can do the job.
@gelinrefira 不可能有潜艇能携带如此巨大的导弹，而且这样的导弹发射可能会让潜艇沉入海底，一艘浮动的驱逐舰才可以完成这个任务。
@gelinrefira No way a Sub can carry such huge missile and the take off can send the sub to the bottom of ocean. A floating Destroyer can do the job.
@gelinrefira 不可能有潜艇能携带如此巨大的导弹，而且这样的导弹发射可能会让潜艇沉入海底，一艘浮动的驱逐舰才可以完成这个任务。
@bradgolding6847
Ummm, . . . . , Monday was the 17th of March, Wednesday was the 19th.
嗯……星期一是3月17日，星期三是3月19日。
Ummm, . . . . , Monday was the 17th of March, Wednesday was the 19th.
嗯……星期一是3月17日，星期三是3月19日。
@EurasiaNaval
My bad. I was actually meant to put Tuesday 18 March... oh well
是我的失误，我本来是想写星期二，3月18日…欧，无所谓了。
My bad. I was actually meant to put Tuesday 18 March... oh well
是我的失误，我本来是想写星期二，3月18日…欧，无所谓了。
@TheNuttyNetterAlexLamb
China is truly number one.
中国才是真正的第一。
China is truly number one.
中国才是真正的第一。
@MohajonFromEast
2:21 Why only one gun? Or this is how it should be?
2分21秒，为什么只有一座火炮？或者说这本来就是设计如此？
2:21 Why only one gun? Or this is how it should be?
2分21秒，为什么只有一座火炮？或者说这本来就是设计如此？
@jimmywang6779
modern warships don't need that many cannons, most of them have less than 2 and typically 152/155/130/100mm
现代军舰并不需要配备太多火炮，大多数仅装备少于两门，且通常口径为152毫米、155毫米、130毫米或100毫米。
modern warships don't need that many cannons, most of them have less than 2 and typically 152/155/130/100mm
现代军舰并不需要配备太多火炮，大多数仅装备少于两门，且通常口径为152毫米、155毫米、130毫米或100毫米。
@Flightman453
It's a frigate. What ships today do you that have more than one main gun?
这是一艘护卫舰，现如今有哪些舰船配备多门主炮？
It's a frigate. What ships today do you that have more than one main gun?
这是一艘护卫舰，现如今有哪些舰船配备多门主炮？
@Team6OWG
It has a CRAM in the back, so it was a CWIS in the front and CWIS (Missiles) in the rear. Look it up.
它后部配备了一套反导弹近防系统（CRAM），所以前部是海军密集阵近防系统（CWIS），而后部则是带导弹的近防系统，具体细节可以查阅相关资料。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It has a CRAM in the back, so it was a CWIS in the front and CWIS (Missiles) in the rear. Look it up.
它后部配备了一套反导弹近防系统（CRAM），所以前部是海军密集阵近防系统（CWIS），而后部则是带导弹的近防系统，具体细节可以查阅相关资料。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@gumpyoldbugger6944
That's that's the most most modern frigates and destroyers carry, mainly for air defense then anti-ship work. The true striking power of a modern frigate and destroyer comes from the VLS and missiles.
这是现代护卫舰和驱逐舰主要装备的武器，主要用于防空，其次是反舰作战，而现代护卫舰和驱逐舰的真正打击力量来自垂直发射系统和导弹。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
That's that's the most most modern frigates and destroyers carry, mainly for air defense then anti-ship work. The true striking power of a modern frigate and destroyer comes from the VLS and missiles.
这是现代护卫舰和驱逐舰主要装备的武器，主要用于防空，其次是反舰作战，而现代护卫舰和驱逐舰的真正打击力量来自垂直发射系统和导弹。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@bohan9957
Why the stupid music? I'd rather hear the live firing.
为什么放这么愚蠢的音乐？我宁愿听到现场的火炮声。
Why the stupid music? I'd rather hear the live firing.
为什么放这么愚蠢的音乐？我宁愿听到现场的火炮声。
@Excalabur50
Bit boring, no missile launches.
有点无聊，没有导弹发射的场面。
Bit boring, no missile launches.
有点无聊，没有导弹发射的场面。
@zixinxia194
Type 054B feel like an European ship, large hull, little weapons.
054B型感觉更像一艘欧洲的舰艇，船体较大但武器较少。
Type 054B feel like an European ship, large hull, little weapons.
054B型感觉更像一艘欧洲的舰艇，船体较大但武器较少。
@gumpyoldbugger6944
I wouldn't call, what is it? 32? I wouldn't call 32 VLS cells as having little in the way of weapons.
我不会这么说，你说啥？32？我不会说32个垂直发射单元算武器较少。
I wouldn't call, what is it? 32? I wouldn't call 32 VLS cells as having little in the way of weapons.
我不会这么说，你说啥？32？我不会说32个垂直发射单元算武器较少。
@Khan-hd5vn
Naval Targets? CIWS, naval guns, and rockets—are those missiles just for show? No navy in the world conducts exercises constantly using CIWS or naval guns. In actual combat, there are almost no opportunities to utilize CIWS. If CIWS is truly needed, it usually indicates a dire or near-desperate situation.
海上目标？近防炮、舰炮、火箭弹，那些导弹难道是只是用来观赏的吗？没有一个国家的海军演习中会时时刻刻都在用近防炮或舰炮，实战中几乎没有机会使用近防炮，若真要用到近防炮，通常已经是接近绝境的处境了。
Naval Targets? CIWS, naval guns, and rockets—are those missiles just for show? No navy in the world conducts exercises constantly using CIWS or naval guns. In actual combat, there are almost no opportunities to utilize CIWS. If CIWS is truly needed, it usually indicates a dire or near-desperate situation.
海上目标？近防炮、舰炮、火箭弹，那些导弹难道是只是用来观赏的吗？没有一个国家的海军演习中会时时刻刻都在用近防炮或舰炮，实战中几乎没有机会使用近防炮，若真要用到近防炮，通常已经是接近绝境的处境了。
@luzhe-y9v
谁说没有导弹演习，只是不给蟾蜍看罢了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
谁说没有导弹演习，只是不给蟾蜍看罢了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Khan-hd5vn
@luzhe-y9v China's character is not reserved; if there's something to showcase, they won't hold back. The long-standing practice of integrating rocket artillery, CIWS, and naval guns into naval operations has its reasons. The answer boils down to one key issue: the instability of shipborne missile launch systems. This also includes the design shortcomings of the missiles themselves. If you observe the rare footage of Chinese shipborne missile launches, there's a common weakness—the "low initial velocity," which reveals quite a bit.
@luzhe-y9v 中國的性格並不含蓄有東西秀不會忍著的 , 這三軍萬年火箭炮海軍加個近防砲艦砲的唯一套路不是沒有原因 , 答案只有一個艦載導彈發射系統不穩定 , 當然也包含艦載導彈本身設計達不了標 , 你看那些稀有的中國艦載導彈發射的影像都有一個共同短版 , "初速慢 "應該能窺知一二
@luzhe-y9v China's character is not reserved; if there's something to showcase, they won't hold back. The long-standing practice of integrating rocket artillery, CIWS, and naval guns into naval operations has its reasons. The answer boils down to one key issue: the instability of shipborne missile launch systems. This also includes the design shortcomings of the missiles themselves. If you observe the rare footage of Chinese shipborne missile launches, there's a common weakness—the "low initial velocity," which reveals quite a bit.
@luzhe-y9v 中國的性格並不含蓄有東西秀不會忍著的 , 這三軍萬年火箭炮海軍加個近防砲艦砲的唯一套路不是沒有原因 , 答案只有一個艦載導彈發射系統不穩定 , 當然也包含艦載導彈本身設計達不了標 , 你看那些稀有的中國艦載導彈發射的影像都有一個共同短版 , "初速慢 "應該能窺知一二
@lanssser7669
好急啊，看戏
好急啊，看戏
@XkMeng
@Khan-hd5vn Funny. Chinese laws stipulate that showcasing active and advanced weapons is prohibited, so it's impossible to see them in official videos. China's frigates and air-defense missiles have already been sold to over a dozen countries. China's UVLS is the world's most advanced universal cold-and-hot launch system. Do you not understand that the so-called "low initial velocity" refers to cold launches, where missiles are ejected from the VLS before ignition occurs in mid-air? This type of launch saves fuel and protects the VLS but requires exceptionally advanced attitude control technology. However, this is not a challenge for China, as the country began launching rockets as early as the 1960s.
@Khan-hd5vn 逗，中国的法律规定现役和先进武器装备不允许秀出来，所以你不可能从官方视频上看到。 中国的护卫舰和对空导弹已经卖到十几个国家。中国的uvls是世界最先进的冷热共架发射系统，你不知道所谓的“初速慢”那是冷发射，是vls弹射出去的导弹么？ 到了空中才开始点火。这种发射可以节省燃料和保护vls，但是需要非常高超的姿态控制技术。但这对中国来说都不是问题，中国最早发射火箭还是上世纪60年代的事。
@Khan-hd5vn Funny. Chinese laws stipulate that showcasing active and advanced weapons is prohibited, so it's impossible to see them in official videos. China's frigates and air-defense missiles have already been sold to over a dozen countries. China's UVLS is the world's most advanced universal cold-and-hot launch system. Do you not understand that the so-called "low initial velocity" refers to cold launches, where missiles are ejected from the VLS before ignition occurs in mid-air? This type of launch saves fuel and protects the VLS but requires exceptionally advanced attitude control technology. However, this is not a challenge for China, as the country began launching rockets as early as the 1960s.
@Khan-hd5vn 逗，中国的法律规定现役和先进武器装备不允许秀出来，所以你不可能从官方视频上看到。 中国的护卫舰和对空导弹已经卖到十几个国家。中国的uvls是世界最先进的冷热共架发射系统，你不知道所谓的“初速慢”那是冷发射，是vls弹射出去的导弹么？ 到了空中才开始点火。这种发射可以节省燃料和保护vls，但是需要非常高超的姿态控制技术。但这对中国来说都不是问题，中国最早发射火箭还是上世纪60年代的事。
很赞 29
收藏