网帖翻译

Peter Kaye
Nope it’s your lack of knowledge, seems like your one of the brainwashed yanks that thinks the USA is supreme, BUT, for your information, it’s all just a dream, the USA with SIX other countries helping them couldn’t even beat a tiny country like Vietnam, AND EVEN AFTER TWENTY YEARS, still had their arses kicked by a bunch of goat herders in Afghanistan. Ran like a bunch of sissies, I would suggest the USA are one of the weakest military on the planet, yes you have a lot of equipment but most of it is outdated and falling apart, Uk, military is very well trained an tough, as they proved in various military games against the US, and China? Far FAR to modern for the US, to even touch them, it’s doesn’t matter how good you THINK your military is, words and fantasy do NOT win wars.

不对，这是你的无知。看起来你是那些被洗脑的人之一，认为美国至高无上，但是，你参考一下，这一切只是一个梦想。美国与其他六个国家一起，甚至无法击败像越南这样的小国。以至于在二十年后，他们仍然被阿富汗的一群牧羊人打得落花流水。像一群胆小鬼一样逃跑。我会说美国是地球上最弱的军事力量之一，是的，你们有很多装备，但其中大部分已经过时并且没啥大威力。英国的军队接受了很好的训练，非常强悍，正如他们在与美国进行的各种军事比赛中证明的那样。至于中国？对于美国来说，他们比之前现代太多了，根本无法对抗。你认为你的军队有多强大并不重要，YY和幻想并不能赢得战争。

Robert Vannrox
Related
Is the United States military better than the Chinese?
From 1950 until 1953, this question was answered.
When the “Korean War” broke out, the North pretty much seized most of Korea, and then the United States led Allied forces entered the conflict.
The Allied forces won battle after battle, pushing the Northern forces back, and back, and back. It was one victory after the other. The American led forces pushed the North Korean forces up to the Chinese border.
When the Allied forces, led by the United States, crossed into China, and started bombing China… China got involved.
From the moment that China got involved, the tide of the war was reversed. And after battle after battle, the Chinese won. The month by month situation plainly shows this onslaught of non-stop Chinese victories against the United States.
The United States sued for peace, and agreed to leave. They left in a (classic) rout. With military installations abandoned in haste, and military depots bombed remotely via Naval bombardment.
All in all, at that time, the United States was at the height of power, and global influence, and it lost to China. Not just “lost”, but had to retreat in a most undignified manner. The United States suffered a defeat that was spectacular.
Is the United States military better than the PLA?
No one knows.
We can only use history as a guide.
And in doing so, we clearly see that the Chinese PLA fought the United States and won. It is up to the reader to determine, for themselves if Chinese PLA forces are weaker today than in 1950, and whether the American military is stronger today than in 1950.
What was the “Korean War” like?

相关讨论
美国军队比中国军队更强吗？
从1950年到1953年，这个问题得到了回答。
当“朝鲜战争”爆发时，原朝鲜军队几乎占领了朝鲜的大部分地区，然后美国领导的联军介入冲突。
联军赢得了一场又一场的战斗，将北方军队打回去，一直打回去。这是一场接一场的胜利。美国领导的军队把朝鲜军队打到了中国边境。
当由美国领导的联军越过中国边境，开始轰炸中国时... 中国介入了。
从中国介入的那一刻起，战争的天平发生了逆转。在一场又一场的战斗之后，中国取得了胜利。后来的情况清楚地显示了这场对美国不断取得的中国胜利的冲击。
美国请求和平，并同意撤退。他们在一场（经典的）溃败中离开。军事设施被匆忙弃置，其军火库通过海军炮击远程轰炸来毁掉。
总的来说，那个时候，美国处于权力和全球影响的巅峰，但却输给了中国。不仅是“输”，而且是以最不体面的方式撤退。美国遭受了一场壮观的失败。
美国军队是否比解放军更强大？
没有人知道。
我们只能以历史为指南。
通过这样做，我们清楚地看到中国解放军与美国作战并取得了胜利。由读者自行判断，中国解放军是否比1950年弱，以及美国军队是否比1950年更强大。
看看“朝鲜战争”是什么样的？

Geoffrey Thorndyke
You do realise that there are about a dozen US States that are bigger than the United Kingdom? (it is actually one fortieth the area of the USA), and there are about 250 million more Americans than Britons?, and the US GDP is 10 times the size of the UK?
USA and China are the third and fourth largest Countries by area, the UK is the 78th !
I wonder if that could have anything to do with it ?.

你知道有大约十几个美国州比英国大吗？（实际上，英国的面积是美国的四十分之一），而且美国人口比英国多大约2.5亿人？而且美国的GDP是英国的十倍？
美国和中国是面积第三和第四大的国家，而英国排名第78！
我想这可能与此有关吧？

Andy Durden
Related
Will China overtake the US militarily?
Not for a long long time.
In pretty much every single area of military development the US maintains large superiority.
Better navy, better army, better airforce.
What China will be able to do is to build strategic antishipping missile defences to created a denial zone a few thousands of Km from China mainland.
Chinese anti ship missiles
are designed to deter foreign navies from, not only reaching Chinese territorial waters but even other parts of the seas and oceans around China

相关讨论
中国会在军事上超过美国吗？
很长一段时间内都不会。
在几乎每个军事发展领域，美国都保持着巨大的优势。
更强大的海军，更强大的陆军，更强大的空军。
中国将能够建立战略性的反舰导弹防御系统，形成一个距离中国大陆数千公里的防御区。
中国的反舰导弹
旨在威慑外国海军，不仅阻止它们进入中国领海，甚至是中国周围的其他海域。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处

Ernest W. Adams
Related
Can China really take on the USA militarily?
That depends on what it's trying to do. China cannot fight and win a blue water sea war with the United States, at least with conventional weapons. Its navy is not strong enough. It can definitely defend mainland China against invasion, and the USA would never try it.
The real question at present is what the USA would do if China mounted an amphibious assault on Taiwan. If the US really commits to Taiwan's defense, the assault would fail—but is the US willing to do that?

相关讨论
中国在军事上真的能与美国匹敌吗？
这取决于它试图做什么。中国至少用传统武器无法在海战中与美国抗衡并取胜。它的海军实力不够强大。但它绝对可以防御中国大陆免受入侵，而美国也绝不会尝试这样做。
当前真正的问题是，如果中国对台湾发动两栖进攻，美国会采取什么行动。如果美国真的致力于捍卫台湾，那么进攻将会失败，但美国是否愿意这样做呢？

Man With A Plan
Its due to the fallout from ww1 and ww2. Without the world wars of the 20th century the US could not have attained its peak power circa 1950's - 60's and it could not have maintained its empire throughout the cold war and into the modern era. Similarly China was weakened by events but also ultimately gained freedom from the influence of the old imperial powers including the UK. The UK didn't really gain anything from events, they only lost. All things being equal and overtime China will quite rightly usurp the US at the top. In time India will also do likewise. This is only natural in a free market system as these are the most populous nations.

这是由于一战和二战导致的后果。如果没有20世纪的世界大战，美国就无法在1950年代和60年代左右达到其巅峰实力，也无法在冷战时期一直保持其帝国地位，直至进入现代社会。同样，中国也因为二战事件而削弱，但最终摆脱了包括英国在内的旧帝国势力的影响，获得了自由。英国在这些事件中实际上并没有得到什么，他们只是失去了。一切平等，随着时间的推移，中国将正当地取代美国的地位。印度最终也会做同样的事情。在自由市场体系中，这只是最人口众多的国家自然而然的发展。