国外网友讨论：为什么特朗普的关税混乱实际上是有道理的（从宏观角度来看）？
正文翻译
图
图
评论翻译
@McFeedback1968
If any of you have watched the interview with China’s trade minister, he utters the phrase “we don’t care” twice as the interviewer was trying to get him to react to losing access to the American market. As soon as I heard the steel in his voice, I knew the US was done. China can get the chips and will take the IP and make them cheaper and probably better. You can’t stop them.
如果你们有人看过中国商务部长的采访，他在采访者试图让他对失去美国市场做出反应时两次说出“我们不在乎”。一听到他语气中的坚定，我就知道美国完了。中国能拿到芯片，会拿走知识产权并制造出更便宜、可能更好的产品。你无法阻止他们。
@GlenHedley-xr4ku
Why oh why do countries like Canada, The EU, still have an almost slavish devotion to the USA? It’s almost like a very horrible marriage. The USA never wants “friends”, only assets. In Canada we never do anything in our best interests, but we want to make sure we don’t piss off the Yanks. Glen Hedley.
为什么像加拿大、欧盟这样的国家仍然对美国有种近乎奴性的忠诚？这几乎像是一段非常糟糕的婚姻。美国从来不想要“朋友”，只想要资产。在加拿大，我们从不做符合我们最佳利益的事，但我们得确保不惹恼美国人。Glen Hedley。
@tonglianheng
Because majority of the elites of Canada and Europe have significant personal interest invested in the US. The US influence and funding dominate the think tanks that advise the respective governments, as well as the political parties and they dominate the media organisations in the respective countries. The American companies also hold monopoly on critical national infrastructure like the internet and cloud services, AI. They also dominate many of the financial systems in these countries, e.g. 90% of British pension funds are exposed to the US financial market. The only large countries who can be called independent from the US are really just China and Russia.
因为加拿大和欧洲的大多数精英在美国有重要的个人利益投资，美国的影响力和资金主导了为各国政府提供建议的智库以及政党，它们还主导了各国的媒体组织。美国公司在关键国家的基础设施上也持有垄断地位，如互联网、云服务和人工智能。它们还主导了这些国家的许多金融系统，例如，90%的英国养老基金暴露在美国金融市场中。唯一可以称得上独立于美国的大国真的只有中国和俄罗斯。
@charles1440
My fear is, if America loses the game, They will just simply kick the table over, so that every living thing loses!
我的恐惧是如果美国输了这场比赛，他们会直接掀翻桌子，让所有生物都输！
@vngdatabase105
That man is a sore loser, for sure. I keep seeing MAGA people claiming that they are hawks and not afraid to go to war, someone should individually interview for those people whether they would be willing to lay down their lives for the sake of their upper class.
那个男人绝对是个输不起的人。我一直看到MAGA的人声称他们是鹰派，不怕开战，应该有人单独采访这些人，问他们是否愿意为上层阶级的利益牺牲生命。
@momokosakurada605
They already lost it. This isn’t the PS2 era. Even when it comes to games and movies and shows, America shows, movies and games are horrible and it’s horrible compared to the old era. Instead we look for South Korea, Japan and China for games instead of the west.
他们已经输了。这不是PS2的时代。即使是在游戏、电影和节目方面，美国的节目、电影和游戏都很糟糕，与过去相比简直显得可怕。相反，我们现在会寻找韩国、日本和中国而不是西方的游戏。
@Miamibeach718
Once a Chinese business man liked a product I had and invited me to China to mass produce it! They were honest about how much they’d pay me to teach my skill and then it would be theirs to do whatever! I agreed and do not regret it! Good business and I made $$$ I needed.
曾经有一个中国商人喜欢我的产品并邀请我去中国量产！他们很诚实地说会付我多少钱来购买我的技能，然后产品就归他们随意处理！我同意了，也不后悔！这是一笔好生意，我赚了我需要的钱。
@makefutur
I keep telling people racism makes you delusional.
我一直告诉人们，种族主义会让你产生妄想。
@James-kd7dc
Whose racist? And if you say Donald provide some evidence of your claim. But we know you won’t respond as you have no proof.
谁是种族主义者？如果你说是唐纳德，请提供一些你的证据。但我们知道你不会回应，因为你没有证据。
@eprd313
@James-kd7dc Trump publicly pitched what was essentially The Apprentice: White People vs. Black People. He said he “wasn’t particularly happy” with the most recent season of his show, so he was considering “an idea that is fairly controversial — creating a team of successful African Americans versus a team of successful whites. Whether people like that idea or not, it is somewhat reflective of our very vicious world.”
@James-kd7dc 特朗普公开提出了一个基本上是《学徒：白人对抗黑人》的想法。他说他对最近一季的节目“不太满意”，所以他在考虑“一个相当有争议的想法——组建一个成功的非裔美国人团队对抗一个成功的白人团队。不管人们喜不喜欢这个想法，它在某种程度上反映了我们这个非常恶毒的世界。”
@imoptimus3448
Trump before elections: “I can and will end all ongoing wars”. Meanwhile after getting elected: started trade war with whole world.
特朗普在选举前：“我可以而且将会结束所有正在进行的战争。”与此同时，选举后：他对全世界发起了贸易战。
@bluechurch776
Tariff decisions should be made by Congress, not declaring an emergency. These tariffs are a wrecking ball that will isolate us from the world for a long time to come. Thanks dump.
关税决定应该由国会做出，而不是宣布紧急状态。这些关税是一颗破坏球，将使我们长期与世界隔绝。谢谢特朗普。
@flyrodmike
It’s true that the Chinese aircraft industry is one of the few industries where China lags behind the United States and France, but are people going to make the mistake of underestimating the Chinese ability to make progress in that industry, just like they did with Japan and Korea in other industries? The tendency of the west to underestimate Asians is comically obvious.
确实，中国的航空工业是少数几个落后于美国和法国的产业之一，但人们会犯低估中国在该行业进步能力的错误吗，就像他们在其他行业低估日本和韩国一样？西方低估亚洲人的倾向明显得有些滑稽。
@Zander_VOs
Feel like the US is like that kid who wants to change the rule of the game that the group been playing, then all the other kids doesn’t want to play with them anymore.
我感觉美国就像那个想改变大家一直在玩的游戏规则的孩子，然后其他孩子都不想再和他玩了。
@michaelmartin4383
Exactly, to bring back industry you have to invest in the next generation, in technical colleges, universities and build workshops and factories. You have to get rid of corporate monopolization and net-zero carbon taxes, bring back free-speech, free-expression and free-creativity to revitalize a culture of innovation. Government has to spend big on Research and Development and give awards for innovation. The Government has to invest in road, rail and shipping infrastructure to ensure smooth supply chains. Re-industrialization, will take between 50-100 years to bring back. It is a long hard road back to an industrial future.
确实，要恢复工业，你必须投资于下一代，投资于技术学院、大学，建设车间和工厂。你必须消除企业垄断和净零碳税，恢复言论自由、表达自由和创造自由以振兴创新文化。政府必须在研发上大笔投入，并为创新颁发奖项。政府还必须投资于公路、铁路和航运基础设施以确保供应链顺畅。重新工业化需要50-100年才能实现，这是一条漫长而艰难的通往工业未来的道路。
@LornaKortgaard
Not one America will be able to take with Trump but Canada sure can under Carney.
没有一个美国人能在特朗普的领导下做到，但加拿大在卡尼的领导下肯定可以。
@AliveBoldTV
I bought my last iPhone in China for a fraction of the price. Even if we make it past this, China has just exposed the lie that is consumerism in the U.S. & as the message spreads, nothing will be the same. We are in such a fragile situation.
我在中国以很低的价格买了我的最后一个iPhone。即使我们挺过了这一关，中国也暴露了美国消费主义的谎言，随着信息的传播，一切都将不同。我们处于如此脆弱的境地。
@theslowpokie
Oh man your video helped me realize that the Trump administration is basically pulling a Karen, screaming that the customer is always right and everyone else is really offput by the Karen screeching.
哦，天哪，你的视频让我意识到特朗普政府基本上是在扮演一个尖叫着顾客永远是对的de“Karen”，而其他人都被“Karen”的尖叫惹恼了。
@internalharm
The trade war failed! I now pay $20 a dozen for eggs and my gas cost $9.99 for 1 gallon. I’m suffering so much. I went to Walmart and now they are charging me $25 cent to use the cart. I ask them why and they said tariff.
贸易战失败了！我现在一打鸡蛋要付20美元，我的汽油每加仑要9.99美元。我痛苦极了。我去了沃尔玛，现在他们用购物车要收我25美分的费用。我问他们为什么，他们说因为关税。
@kevinwu8751
In fact, this is one of the seven deadly sins of human nature - jealousy. Why am I richer than you, and developed earlier than you, but now I’m not as successful as you? It’s not because of my lack of ability, but it must be because of your badness. This is almost the way that all Western countries understand China.
事实上，这是人性的七宗罪之一——嫉妒。为什么我比你富有，我比你发展得更早，但现在我不如你成功？这不是因为我缺乏能力，肯定是因为你不好。这几乎是所有西方国家理解中国的方式。
@SeanLumly
Huawei is worker co-op?! WHAT?! That’s AMAZING!
华为是工人合作社？！什么？！这太棒了！
@AustinJT888
Yes. Owner is only keep 1%. The 99% are “Rent” out to all employees. Everyone that works for Huawei can buy shares. And will have to sell it back once they stopped working or fired.
是的。华为的所有者只保留了1%的股份，99%的股份都“租”给了所有员工。每个在华为工作的人都可以购买股份，一旦停止工作或被解雇，就必须卖回。
@SteveZhou-xe3fe
Huawei’s equity is very dispersed, with founder/CEO Ren Zhengfei owning approximately 1% of the company’s equity, and the remaining 99% held entirely by the Huawei Investment Holding Co., Ltd. Labor unx Committee (referred to as the unx).
华为的股权非常分散，创始人/首席执行官任正非拥有大约1%的公司股权，其余99%完全由华为投资控股有限公司工会委员会（简称工会）持有。
@mochamadeffendi6590
Approximately 99.16% of Huawei’s shares are held by a trade unx committee, representing employee ownership. This structure is designed to distribute profits to employees through dividends, though employees do not hold direct equity or voting rights. Ren Zhengfei, Huawei’s founder, owns about 0.84% of the shares. Despite his small stake, he retains significant influence as CEO and through leadership roles.
大约99.16%的华为股份由代表员工所有权的工会委员会持有。这种结构旨在通过分红将利润分配给员工，尽管员工不直接持有股权或投票权。华为的创始人任正非拥有大约0.84%的股份，尽管他的股份很少，但他作为首席执行官和通过领导角色仍保持重大的影响力。
@danicoleb5394
I’ve been hoping and praying that Americans would get educated on co-ops and start championing this. It’s the best grassroots advocacy and work we could do to protect ourselves for the long-term (barring any erasure of laws and ethics of course). We should be using member co-ops for essential goods and services and worker co-ops for non-essential goods/services. This way everyone wins because we are all both laborers and consumers.
我一直希望并祈祷美国人能了解合作社并开始支持它，这是我们能做的最好的以长期保护自己的基层倡导和工作（当然，除非法律和道德被抹去）。我们应该将会员合作社用于必需品和服务，将工人合作社用于非必需品/服务。这样每个人都能赢，因为我们既是劳动者也是消费者。
@CoretteLecuyeer
This trade war has to be one of the dumbest in history. Prices are already out of control, and now with these tariffs, everyday essentials are just going to get more expensive. It feels like regular people are paying the price for political games.
这场贸易战肯定是历史上最愚蠢的贸易战之一。现在价格已经失控，有了这些关税，日常必需品只会变得更贵。我感觉普通人正在为政治游戏付出代价。
@DieterHertz
I’ve been feeling the squeeze already. Groceries, gas, even basic household items, it’s all going up. I’ve tried cutting back on unnecessary expenses, but it feels like no matter what I do, my money just isn’t stretching as far as it used to.
我已经感觉到压力了。杂货、汽油，甚至基本的家居用品，价格都在上涨。我试着削减不必要的开支，但感觉不管我做什么，我的钱都不像以前那样够用了。
@ZachZaki77
I was in the same situation, but I got some help from my financial advisor. She helped me restructure my finances so I wasn’t so vulnerable to these economic swings. It’s not just about saving more, it’s about knowing where to put your money so it actually works for you.
我也有过同样的情况，但我的财务顾问帮了我。她帮我重组了财务，让我不那么容易受到经济波动的冲击。不仅仅是多存钱，而是要知道把钱放在哪里，让它真正为你工作。
@KedaiNasi
As a guy living in SE Asia = life is good. We have no liberal/republican shit right here, tariffs aren’t affecting us that much and we’re much closer in trade with China than America. Heck, China investments in SE Asia countries have flourished and even revitalized smaller towns for years now.
作为一个生活在东南亚的人，我的生活很好。我们这里没有自由派/共和派的争端，关税对我们的影响不大，我们与中国的贸易比与美国近得多。见鬼，中国在东南亚国家的投资蓬勃发展，多年来它甚至振兴了小城镇。
@ChiliPepper-o9y
If the Pharmaceutical company pays 10 cents for a medication from China, that’s 1 cent on the tariff. If they mark it up, as they always do, 100x then that hardly affects the buyer. That’s ditto with everything else. It costs them nothing since they purchase for pennies from China but mark every up from 100 to 1000 times for the American buyer!
如果制药公司为中国的药物支付10美分，关税就是1美分。如果他们像往常一样加价100倍，那对买家的影响微乎其微。其他东西也是如此。他们几乎没成本，因为他们从中国以几分钱买进，但对美国买家加价100到1000倍！
@thomasbayer2832
Not as extreme with electronics. A 100+% tariff will hit consumers and inflation will spiral out of control.
电子产品没有那么极端。100%以上的关税会打击消费者，通货膨胀会失控。
@Anneli1580
Thanks Ben for calling a spade a spade. The tariffs indeed are ‘unilateral’, nothing ‘reciprocal’ in it economically speaking.
感谢Ben直言不讳。这些关税确实是“单边的”，从经济角度看没有任何“互惠”可言。
@infosuge
This isn’t about trade tariffs as such. It’s about who gets to set the terms of capitalism itself. If China’s version wins that is a threat to neoliberalism and colonialists elite in the west. Which is why Europe, UK and the west in general will be left holding the bag as US will come to agreement with China but the vassals will pay tribute.
这不仅仅与贸易关税本身有关，而是与谁来设定资本主义本身的条款有关。如果中国的版本获胜，那将是对新自由主义和西方殖民精英的威胁。这就是为什么欧洲、英国和整个西方最终会承担后果，因为美国会与中国达成协议，但附庸国将付出代价。
@charleslamontagne983
Asked Google how much of Walmart product comes from China. Answer: about 70%. I suppose it is the same from Amazon. So Trump just raised prices on what the Americans buy the most. I wonder how long this will last.
我问谷歌沃尔玛的产品有多少来自中国。答案是：大约70%。我猜亚马逊也是一样。所以特朗普只是提高了美国人买得最多的东西的价格。我想知道这会持续多久。
@jwilliams-10
Also these luxury goods made in China are marked up drastically IN the US, so the impact to Chinese manufacturers is considerably less than the impact to US profits.
同样，中国制造的奢侈品在美国被大幅加价，所以对中国制造商的影响远小于对美国利润的影响。
@haibirhussin2169
Very good exposure of Trump stupidity and arrogant mindset, I felt so sorry for most American mostly the non elite families suffers the economics pains, in facts most parts of whole world, indeed.
视频很好地揭露了特朗普的愚蠢和傲慢心态，我为大多数美国人特别是非精英家庭遭受的经济痛苦感到非常遗憾，事实上，全世界大部分地区也是如此。
@eddieleong6490
China’s journey to self-sufficiency in energy, good, technology, etc. is far from over. Water will be diverted from Tibet to make the vast xinjiang desert into a massive farmland using advanced agriculture robots. China will continue to blanket its vast deserts with solar panels. China has started the first seabed data center so that energy is not needed to cool the data computers, etc. China is patient. They know that USA faces uncertain political changes every two years while China is just a continuation of the same government for decades. China and USA will always be friends.
中国在能源、商品、技术等方面自给自足的征程还远未结束。水将从西藏引流，将新疆广阔的沙漠变成使用先进农业机器人的大片农田。中国将继续在其广阔的沙漠中覆盖太阳能板。中国已经启动了第一个海底数据中心，这样就不需要能源来冷却数据计算机等。中国很有耐心。他们知道美国每两年就会面临一次不确定的政治变革，而中国只是几十年来同一个政府的延续。中国和美国永远是朋友。
@Pierre_en_CI
Doubling the price on cellphones would hit the supporters of Trump right away, and would give ammunition to his opponents. It was a bad idea right from the start, am surprised this chess game turned into ‘hangman’ so fast.
将手机价格翻倍会立即打击特朗普的支持者，并给他的对手提供弹药。这从一开始就是个坏主意，我很惊讶这场棋局这么快就变成了“刽子手”。
@mattb.1357
If this is the case why has C now come to the table to negotiate also the whole reason for the tariffs was because C was not going by the rules of the trade commission cheating many countries financially not to mention other issues also like unsafe buildings collapsing on people inside and outside of C and the drugs that kill people coming from C.
如果是这样，为什么C现在也来谈判了？关税的全部原因是由于C不遵守贸易委员会的规则，在财务上欺骗了许多国家，更不用说还有其他问题，比如C内外不安全的建筑物倒塌砸到人以及来自C的致命药物。(译注：抹黑造谣)
@ChiliPepper-o9y
It worked for some people. The world’s richest people saw their wealth surge by a record $304 billion after the U.S. delayed imposing new tariffs, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Elon Musk gained the most from the stock market rally, with his net worth jumping by $36 billion.
这对一些人有效。据彭博亿万富翁指数，美国推迟实施新关税后，全球最富有的人的财富激增了创纪录的3040亿美元。埃隆·马斯克从股市上涨中获益最多，他的净资产飙升了360亿美元。
@yapcheeseng2735
USA need a president that think of economy, fair trade, peace and stability of the world. Not dominance and control. Why China and Russia is building their military warfare is because of USA military dominance and threats.
美国需要一位考虑经济、公平贸易、世界和平与稳定而不是支配和控制的总统。中国和俄罗斯之所以建设军事力量，是因为美国的军事霸权和威胁。
@KraKra-Ah
It is not even possible to have a normal conversation with Trump. Not because his English is very simplified and finish a normal sentence is very hard for Trump, no, he dares not to have a normal conversation afraid of getting stuck within minutes. Simple people choose simple leaders with simplistic ideas.
你甚至不可能与特朗普进行正常的对话。不是因为他的英语非常简单，完成一个正常句子对特朗普来说很难，不，他不敢进行正常的对话，他害怕几分钟内就会卡壳。简单的人会选择简单的，带着简单化的想法的领导者。
@thanosandnobill3789
The only area in my opinion China seems to be very back in soft cultural power. But also this is changing if we take in consideration that the movie Ne Zha 2 is the first non-American film that surpassed 1 billion dollars (is almost 2 now) at box office globally. And in the video game industry they had Black Myth Wukong which sold 30 million copies! I hope they will continue like this.
在我看来，中国唯一似乎非常落后的领域是软文化力量，但如果考虑到电影《哪吒2》是第一部全球票房超过10亿美元的非美国电影（现在接近20亿美元），这也在改变。在视频游戏行业，他们有卖出了3000万份的《黑神话：悟空》！我希望他们能继续这样。
@Zidana123
Speaking as an Overseas Chinese, I think it’s important to note that while Chinese diaspora the world over loved Ne Zha 2 and Black Myth Wukong, these had low penetration into non-Chinese audiences. In the realm of soft cultural power, it’s still nowhere near… let’s just take your boy Thanos there, pretty much everyone in the world knows who he is.
作为海外华人，我想指出虽然全世界的华人群体都喜欢《哪吒2》和《黑神话：悟空》，但这些在非华人观众中的渗透率很低。在软文化力量领域，它还远远比不上……就拿你们的灭霸来说，世界上几乎每个人都知道他是谁。
@andybunn5780
@Zidana123 As someone not adjacent to the Chinese cultural sphere in any significant way, I have no idea what these things are, but I see your point. I simply want to add that there are major communication barriers when it comes to artistic media. I think AI will change that in the short future, if it hasn’t already.
@Zidana123 作为一个与中国文化圈没有太大关联的人，我完全不知道这些是什么，但我明白你的观点。我只想补充一点，东西方在艺术媒体方面存在主要的沟通障碍。我认为人工智能会在短期内改变这一点，如果它还没有改变的话。
@lindawhitaker2114
This would be so amusing and entertaining if it were a Netflix series and not our actual reality here in the US. Ben Norton is my absolute favorite channel for explaining WTF is really happening behind this gaslighting clown show victimizing Americans right now.
如果这是一部Netflix剧集而不是我们美国的现实，那会非常有趣和欢乐。Ben Norton的频道是我最喜欢的频道，它解释了现在这个愚弄美国人的小丑秀背后到底发生了什么。
If any of you have watched the interview with China’s trade minister, he utters the phrase “we don’t care” twice as the interviewer was trying to get him to react to losing access to the American market. As soon as I heard the steel in his voice, I knew the US was done. China can get the chips and will take the IP and make them cheaper and probably better. You can’t stop them.
如果你们有人看过中国商务部长的采访，他在采访者试图让他对失去美国市场做出反应时两次说出“我们不在乎”。一听到他语气中的坚定，我就知道美国完了。中国能拿到芯片，会拿走知识产权并制造出更便宜、可能更好的产品。你无法阻止他们。
@GlenHedley-xr4ku
Why oh why do countries like Canada, The EU, still have an almost slavish devotion to the USA? It’s almost like a very horrible marriage. The USA never wants “friends”, only assets. In Canada we never do anything in our best interests, but we want to make sure we don’t piss off the Yanks. Glen Hedley.
为什么像加拿大、欧盟这样的国家仍然对美国有种近乎奴性的忠诚？这几乎像是一段非常糟糕的婚姻。美国从来不想要“朋友”，只想要资产。在加拿大，我们从不做符合我们最佳利益的事，但我们得确保不惹恼美国人。Glen Hedley。
@tonglianheng
Because majority of the elites of Canada and Europe have significant personal interest invested in the US. The US influence and funding dominate the think tanks that advise the respective governments, as well as the political parties and they dominate the media organisations in the respective countries. The American companies also hold monopoly on critical national infrastructure like the internet and cloud services, AI. They also dominate many of the financial systems in these countries, e.g. 90% of British pension funds are exposed to the US financial market. The only large countries who can be called independent from the US are really just China and Russia.
因为加拿大和欧洲的大多数精英在美国有重要的个人利益投资，美国的影响力和资金主导了为各国政府提供建议的智库以及政党，它们还主导了各国的媒体组织。美国公司在关键国家的基础设施上也持有垄断地位，如互联网、云服务和人工智能。它们还主导了这些国家的许多金融系统，例如，90%的英国养老基金暴露在美国金融市场中。唯一可以称得上独立于美国的大国真的只有中国和俄罗斯。
@charles1440
My fear is, if America loses the game, They will just simply kick the table over, so that every living thing loses!
我的恐惧是如果美国输了这场比赛，他们会直接掀翻桌子，让所有生物都输！
@vngdatabase105
That man is a sore loser, for sure. I keep seeing MAGA people claiming that they are hawks and not afraid to go to war, someone should individually interview for those people whether they would be willing to lay down their lives for the sake of their upper class.
那个男人绝对是个输不起的人。我一直看到MAGA的人声称他们是鹰派，不怕开战，应该有人单独采访这些人，问他们是否愿意为上层阶级的利益牺牲生命。
@momokosakurada605
They already lost it. This isn’t the PS2 era. Even when it comes to games and movies and shows, America shows, movies and games are horrible and it’s horrible compared to the old era. Instead we look for South Korea, Japan and China for games instead of the west.
他们已经输了。这不是PS2的时代。即使是在游戏、电影和节目方面，美国的节目、电影和游戏都很糟糕，与过去相比简直显得可怕。相反，我们现在会寻找韩国、日本和中国而不是西方的游戏。
@Miamibeach718
Once a Chinese business man liked a product I had and invited me to China to mass produce it! They were honest about how much they’d pay me to teach my skill and then it would be theirs to do whatever! I agreed and do not regret it! Good business and I made $$$ I needed.
曾经有一个中国商人喜欢我的产品并邀请我去中国量产！他们很诚实地说会付我多少钱来购买我的技能，然后产品就归他们随意处理！我同意了，也不后悔！这是一笔好生意，我赚了我需要的钱。
@makefutur
I keep telling people racism makes you delusional.
我一直告诉人们，种族主义会让你产生妄想。
@James-kd7dc
Whose racist? And if you say Donald provide some evidence of your claim. But we know you won’t respond as you have no proof.
谁是种族主义者？如果你说是唐纳德，请提供一些你的证据。但我们知道你不会回应，因为你没有证据。
@eprd313
@James-kd7dc Trump publicly pitched what was essentially The Apprentice: White People vs. Black People. He said he “wasn’t particularly happy” with the most recent season of his show, so he was considering “an idea that is fairly controversial — creating a team of successful African Americans versus a team of successful whites. Whether people like that idea or not, it is somewhat reflective of our very vicious world.”
@James-kd7dc 特朗普公开提出了一个基本上是《学徒：白人对抗黑人》的想法。他说他对最近一季的节目“不太满意”，所以他在考虑“一个相当有争议的想法——组建一个成功的非裔美国人团队对抗一个成功的白人团队。不管人们喜不喜欢这个想法，它在某种程度上反映了我们这个非常恶毒的世界。”
@imoptimus3448
Trump before elections: “I can and will end all ongoing wars”. Meanwhile after getting elected: started trade war with whole world.
特朗普在选举前：“我可以而且将会结束所有正在进行的战争。”与此同时，选举后：他对全世界发起了贸易战。
@bluechurch776
Tariff decisions should be made by Congress, not declaring an emergency. These tariffs are a wrecking ball that will isolate us from the world for a long time to come. Thanks dump.
关税决定应该由国会做出，而不是宣布紧急状态。这些关税是一颗破坏球，将使我们长期与世界隔绝。谢谢特朗普。
@flyrodmike
It’s true that the Chinese aircraft industry is one of the few industries where China lags behind the United States and France, but are people going to make the mistake of underestimating the Chinese ability to make progress in that industry, just like they did with Japan and Korea in other industries? The tendency of the west to underestimate Asians is comically obvious.
确实，中国的航空工业是少数几个落后于美国和法国的产业之一，但人们会犯低估中国在该行业进步能力的错误吗，就像他们在其他行业低估日本和韩国一样？西方低估亚洲人的倾向明显得有些滑稽。
@Zander_VOs
Feel like the US is like that kid who wants to change the rule of the game that the group been playing, then all the other kids doesn’t want to play with them anymore.
我感觉美国就像那个想改变大家一直在玩的游戏规则的孩子，然后其他孩子都不想再和他玩了。
@michaelmartin4383
Exactly, to bring back industry you have to invest in the next generation, in technical colleges, universities and build workshops and factories. You have to get rid of corporate monopolization and net-zero carbon taxes, bring back free-speech, free-expression and free-creativity to revitalize a culture of innovation. Government has to spend big on Research and Development and give awards for innovation. The Government has to invest in road, rail and shipping infrastructure to ensure smooth supply chains. Re-industrialization, will take between 50-100 years to bring back. It is a long hard road back to an industrial future.
确实，要恢复工业，你必须投资于下一代，投资于技术学院、大学，建设车间和工厂。你必须消除企业垄断和净零碳税，恢复言论自由、表达自由和创造自由以振兴创新文化。政府必须在研发上大笔投入，并为创新颁发奖项。政府还必须投资于公路、铁路和航运基础设施以确保供应链顺畅。重新工业化需要50-100年才能实现，这是一条漫长而艰难的通往工业未来的道路。
@LornaKortgaard
Not one America will be able to take with Trump but Canada sure can under Carney.
没有一个美国人能在特朗普的领导下做到，但加拿大在卡尼的领导下肯定可以。
@AliveBoldTV
I bought my last iPhone in China for a fraction of the price. Even if we make it past this, China has just exposed the lie that is consumerism in the U.S. & as the message spreads, nothing will be the same. We are in such a fragile situation.
我在中国以很低的价格买了我的最后一个iPhone。即使我们挺过了这一关，中国也暴露了美国消费主义的谎言，随着信息的传播，一切都将不同。我们处于如此脆弱的境地。
@theslowpokie
Oh man your video helped me realize that the Trump administration is basically pulling a Karen, screaming that the customer is always right and everyone else is really offput by the Karen screeching.
哦，天哪，你的视频让我意识到特朗普政府基本上是在扮演一个尖叫着顾客永远是对的de“Karen”，而其他人都被“Karen”的尖叫惹恼了。
@internalharm
The trade war failed! I now pay $20 a dozen for eggs and my gas cost $9.99 for 1 gallon. I’m suffering so much. I went to Walmart and now they are charging me $25 cent to use the cart. I ask them why and they said tariff.
贸易战失败了！我现在一打鸡蛋要付20美元，我的汽油每加仑要9.99美元。我痛苦极了。我去了沃尔玛，现在他们用购物车要收我25美分的费用。我问他们为什么，他们说因为关税。
@kevinwu8751
In fact, this is one of the seven deadly sins of human nature - jealousy. Why am I richer than you, and developed earlier than you, but now I’m not as successful as you? It’s not because of my lack of ability, but it must be because of your badness. This is almost the way that all Western countries understand China.
事实上，这是人性的七宗罪之一——嫉妒。为什么我比你富有，我比你发展得更早，但现在我不如你成功？这不是因为我缺乏能力，肯定是因为你不好。这几乎是所有西方国家理解中国的方式。
@SeanLumly
Huawei is worker co-op?! WHAT?! That’s AMAZING!
华为是工人合作社？！什么？！这太棒了！
@AustinJT888
Yes. Owner is only keep 1%. The 99% are “Rent” out to all employees. Everyone that works for Huawei can buy shares. And will have to sell it back once they stopped working or fired.
是的。华为的所有者只保留了1%的股份，99%的股份都“租”给了所有员工。每个在华为工作的人都可以购买股份，一旦停止工作或被解雇，就必须卖回。
@SteveZhou-xe3fe
Huawei’s equity is very dispersed, with founder/CEO Ren Zhengfei owning approximately 1% of the company’s equity, and the remaining 99% held entirely by the Huawei Investment Holding Co., Ltd. Labor unx Committee (referred to as the unx).
华为的股权非常分散，创始人/首席执行官任正非拥有大约1%的公司股权，其余99%完全由华为投资控股有限公司工会委员会（简称工会）持有。
@mochamadeffendi6590
Approximately 99.16% of Huawei’s shares are held by a trade unx committee, representing employee ownership. This structure is designed to distribute profits to employees through dividends, though employees do not hold direct equity or voting rights. Ren Zhengfei, Huawei’s founder, owns about 0.84% of the shares. Despite his small stake, he retains significant influence as CEO and through leadership roles.
大约99.16%的华为股份由代表员工所有权的工会委员会持有。这种结构旨在通过分红将利润分配给员工，尽管员工不直接持有股权或投票权。华为的创始人任正非拥有大约0.84%的股份，尽管他的股份很少，但他作为首席执行官和通过领导角色仍保持重大的影响力。
@danicoleb5394
I’ve been hoping and praying that Americans would get educated on co-ops and start championing this. It’s the best grassroots advocacy and work we could do to protect ourselves for the long-term (barring any erasure of laws and ethics of course). We should be using member co-ops for essential goods and services and worker co-ops for non-essential goods/services. This way everyone wins because we are all both laborers and consumers.
我一直希望并祈祷美国人能了解合作社并开始支持它，这是我们能做的最好的以长期保护自己的基层倡导和工作（当然，除非法律和道德被抹去）。我们应该将会员合作社用于必需品和服务，将工人合作社用于非必需品/服务。这样每个人都能赢，因为我们既是劳动者也是消费者。
@CoretteLecuyeer
This trade war has to be one of the dumbest in history. Prices are already out of control, and now with these tariffs, everyday essentials are just going to get more expensive. It feels like regular people are paying the price for political games.
这场贸易战肯定是历史上最愚蠢的贸易战之一。现在价格已经失控，有了这些关税，日常必需品只会变得更贵。我感觉普通人正在为政治游戏付出代价。
@DieterHertz
I’ve been feeling the squeeze already. Groceries, gas, even basic household items, it’s all going up. I’ve tried cutting back on unnecessary expenses, but it feels like no matter what I do, my money just isn’t stretching as far as it used to.
我已经感觉到压力了。杂货、汽油，甚至基本的家居用品，价格都在上涨。我试着削减不必要的开支，但感觉不管我做什么，我的钱都不像以前那样够用了。
@ZachZaki77
I was in the same situation, but I got some help from my financial advisor. She helped me restructure my finances so I wasn’t so vulnerable to these economic swings. It’s not just about saving more, it’s about knowing where to put your money so it actually works for you.
我也有过同样的情况，但我的财务顾问帮了我。她帮我重组了财务，让我不那么容易受到经济波动的冲击。不仅仅是多存钱，而是要知道把钱放在哪里，让它真正为你工作。
@KedaiNasi
As a guy living in SE Asia = life is good. We have no liberal/republican shit right here, tariffs aren’t affecting us that much and we’re much closer in trade with China than America. Heck, China investments in SE Asia countries have flourished and even revitalized smaller towns for years now.
作为一个生活在东南亚的人，我的生活很好。我们这里没有自由派/共和派的争端，关税对我们的影响不大，我们与中国的贸易比与美国近得多。见鬼，中国在东南亚国家的投资蓬勃发展，多年来它甚至振兴了小城镇。
@ChiliPepper-o9y
If the Pharmaceutical company pays 10 cents for a medication from China, that’s 1 cent on the tariff. If they mark it up, as they always do, 100x then that hardly affects the buyer. That’s ditto with everything else. It costs them nothing since they purchase for pennies from China but mark every up from 100 to 1000 times for the American buyer!
如果制药公司为中国的药物支付10美分，关税就是1美分。如果他们像往常一样加价100倍，那对买家的影响微乎其微。其他东西也是如此。他们几乎没成本，因为他们从中国以几分钱买进，但对美国买家加价100到1000倍！
@thomasbayer2832
Not as extreme with electronics. A 100+% tariff will hit consumers and inflation will spiral out of control.
电子产品没有那么极端。100%以上的关税会打击消费者，通货膨胀会失控。
@Anneli1580
Thanks Ben for calling a spade a spade. The tariffs indeed are ‘unilateral’, nothing ‘reciprocal’ in it economically speaking.
感谢Ben直言不讳。这些关税确实是“单边的”，从经济角度看没有任何“互惠”可言。
@infosuge
This isn’t about trade tariffs as such. It’s about who gets to set the terms of capitalism itself. If China’s version wins that is a threat to neoliberalism and colonialists elite in the west. Which is why Europe, UK and the west in general will be left holding the bag as US will come to agreement with China but the vassals will pay tribute.
这不仅仅与贸易关税本身有关，而是与谁来设定资本主义本身的条款有关。如果中国的版本获胜，那将是对新自由主义和西方殖民精英的威胁。这就是为什么欧洲、英国和整个西方最终会承担后果，因为美国会与中国达成协议，但附庸国将付出代价。
@charleslamontagne983
Asked Google how much of Walmart product comes from China. Answer: about 70%. I suppose it is the same from Amazon. So Trump just raised prices on what the Americans buy the most. I wonder how long this will last.
我问谷歌沃尔玛的产品有多少来自中国。答案是：大约70%。我猜亚马逊也是一样。所以特朗普只是提高了美国人买得最多的东西的价格。我想知道这会持续多久。
@jwilliams-10
Also these luxury goods made in China are marked up drastically IN the US, so the impact to Chinese manufacturers is considerably less than the impact to US profits.
同样，中国制造的奢侈品在美国被大幅加价，所以对中国制造商的影响远小于对美国利润的影响。
@haibirhussin2169
Very good exposure of Trump stupidity and arrogant mindset, I felt so sorry for most American mostly the non elite families suffers the economics pains, in facts most parts of whole world, indeed.
视频很好地揭露了特朗普的愚蠢和傲慢心态，我为大多数美国人特别是非精英家庭遭受的经济痛苦感到非常遗憾，事实上，全世界大部分地区也是如此。
@eddieleong6490
China’s journey to self-sufficiency in energy, good, technology, etc. is far from over. Water will be diverted from Tibet to make the vast xinjiang desert into a massive farmland using advanced agriculture robots. China will continue to blanket its vast deserts with solar panels. China has started the first seabed data center so that energy is not needed to cool the data computers, etc. China is patient. They know that USA faces uncertain political changes every two years while China is just a continuation of the same government for decades. China and USA will always be friends.
中国在能源、商品、技术等方面自给自足的征程还远未结束。水将从西藏引流，将新疆广阔的沙漠变成使用先进农业机器人的大片农田。中国将继续在其广阔的沙漠中覆盖太阳能板。中国已经启动了第一个海底数据中心，这样就不需要能源来冷却数据计算机等。中国很有耐心。他们知道美国每两年就会面临一次不确定的政治变革，而中国只是几十年来同一个政府的延续。中国和美国永远是朋友。
@Pierre_en_CI
Doubling the price on cellphones would hit the supporters of Trump right away, and would give ammunition to his opponents. It was a bad idea right from the start, am surprised this chess game turned into ‘hangman’ so fast.
将手机价格翻倍会立即打击特朗普的支持者，并给他的对手提供弹药。这从一开始就是个坏主意，我很惊讶这场棋局这么快就变成了“刽子手”。
@mattb.1357
If this is the case why has C now come to the table to negotiate also the whole reason for the tariffs was because C was not going by the rules of the trade commission cheating many countries financially not to mention other issues also like unsafe buildings collapsing on people inside and outside of C and the drugs that kill people coming from C.
如果是这样，为什么C现在也来谈判了？关税的全部原因是由于C不遵守贸易委员会的规则，在财务上欺骗了许多国家，更不用说还有其他问题，比如C内外不安全的建筑物倒塌砸到人以及来自C的致命药物。(译注：抹黑造谣)
@ChiliPepper-o9y
It worked for some people. The world’s richest people saw their wealth surge by a record $304 billion after the U.S. delayed imposing new tariffs, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Elon Musk gained the most from the stock market rally, with his net worth jumping by $36 billion.
这对一些人有效。据彭博亿万富翁指数，美国推迟实施新关税后，全球最富有的人的财富激增了创纪录的3040亿美元。埃隆·马斯克从股市上涨中获益最多，他的净资产飙升了360亿美元。
@yapcheeseng2735
USA need a president that think of economy, fair trade, peace and stability of the world. Not dominance and control. Why China and Russia is building their military warfare is because of USA military dominance and threats.
美国需要一位考虑经济、公平贸易、世界和平与稳定而不是支配和控制的总统。中国和俄罗斯之所以建设军事力量，是因为美国的军事霸权和威胁。
@KraKra-Ah
It is not even possible to have a normal conversation with Trump. Not because his English is very simplified and finish a normal sentence is very hard for Trump, no, he dares not to have a normal conversation afraid of getting stuck within minutes. Simple people choose simple leaders with simplistic ideas.
你甚至不可能与特朗普进行正常的对话。不是因为他的英语非常简单，完成一个正常句子对特朗普来说很难，不，他不敢进行正常的对话，他害怕几分钟内就会卡壳。简单的人会选择简单的，带着简单化的想法的领导者。
@thanosandnobill3789
The only area in my opinion China seems to be very back in soft cultural power. But also this is changing if we take in consideration that the movie Ne Zha 2 is the first non-American film that surpassed 1 billion dollars (is almost 2 now) at box office globally. And in the video game industry they had Black Myth Wukong which sold 30 million copies! I hope they will continue like this.
在我看来，中国唯一似乎非常落后的领域是软文化力量，但如果考虑到电影《哪吒2》是第一部全球票房超过10亿美元的非美国电影（现在接近20亿美元），这也在改变。在视频游戏行业，他们有卖出了3000万份的《黑神话：悟空》！我希望他们能继续这样。
@Zidana123
Speaking as an Overseas Chinese, I think it’s important to note that while Chinese diaspora the world over loved Ne Zha 2 and Black Myth Wukong, these had low penetration into non-Chinese audiences. In the realm of soft cultural power, it’s still nowhere near… let’s just take your boy Thanos there, pretty much everyone in the world knows who he is.
作为海外华人，我想指出虽然全世界的华人群体都喜欢《哪吒2》和《黑神话：悟空》，但这些在非华人观众中的渗透率很低。在软文化力量领域，它还远远比不上……就拿你们的灭霸来说，世界上几乎每个人都知道他是谁。
@andybunn5780
@Zidana123 As someone not adjacent to the Chinese cultural sphere in any significant way, I have no idea what these things are, but I see your point. I simply want to add that there are major communication barriers when it comes to artistic media. I think AI will change that in the short future, if it hasn’t already.
@Zidana123 作为一个与中国文化圈没有太大关联的人，我完全不知道这些是什么，但我明白你的观点。我只想补充一点，东西方在艺术媒体方面存在主要的沟通障碍。我认为人工智能会在短期内改变这一点，如果它还没有改变的话。
@lindawhitaker2114
This would be so amusing and entertaining if it were a Netflix series and not our actual reality here in the US. Ben Norton is my absolute favorite channel for explaining WTF is really happening behind this gaslighting clown show victimizing Americans right now.
如果这是一部Netflix剧集而不是我们美国的现实，那会非常有趣和欢乐。Ben Norton的频道是我最喜欢的频道，它解释了现在这个愚弄美国人的小丑秀背后到底发生了什么。
