突发消息：美国准备公布另一款新的隐形战斗机（海军的F/A-XX）。美国网民兴奋异常，纷纷为PPT取名
正文翻译
According to reports, the U.S. is getting ready to announce the contract award for its second 6th generation stealth fighter, and this time, it’ll be a carrier-capable jet meant for service aboard the U.S. Navy’s aircraft carriers.
据报道，美国即将宣布其第二款第六代隐形战斗机的合同授予情况，这一次是一款能够在航空母舰上使用的舰载型战机，计划为美军海军航母服务。
According to reports, the U.S. is getting ready to announce the contract award for its second 6th generation stealth fighter, and this time, it’ll be a carrier-capable jet meant for service aboard the U.S. Navy’s aircraft carriers.
据报道，美国即将宣布其第二款第六代隐形战斗机的合同授予情况，这一次是一款能够在航空母舰上使用的舰载型战机，计划为美军海军航母服务。
评论翻译
@dvazquez5652
F/A-19 Super Duper Hornet
F/A-19超级无敌大黄蜂
F/A-19 Super Duper Hornet
F/A-19超级无敌大黄蜂
@sdericmonty
Hornet Cat!
大黄猫！
Hornet Cat!
大黄猫！
@FreedomandBaconHomestead
I LOLd
笑死了。
I LOLd
笑死了。
@Tim2-yi7pu
They already have a super duper hornet
他们已经拥有了一款超级牛逼蜂战机
They already have a super duper hornet
他们已经拥有了一款超级牛逼蜂战机
@phantomechelon3628
F/A-45 Orange Goblin
F/A-45 橙色地精
F/A-45 Orange Goblin
F/A-45 橙色地精
@isaac_shelton
wasn't it already confirmed to be F/A-20 for designation
不就是已经确认型号是F/A-20了吗？
wasn't it already confirmed to be F/A-20 for designation
不就是已经确认型号是F/A-20了吗？
@zackdattacker
This killed me!!!
这个让我笑死了！！！
This killed me!!!
这个让我笑死了！！！
@nunessilva2162
Super Duper is an amazing name...
超级牛逼是个非常棒的名字啊
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Super Duper is an amazing name...
超级牛逼是个非常棒的名字啊
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@ferretsnot
Ultra Hornet, Hornet Platinum, Justice Hornet?
终极大黄蜂、铂金大黄蜂、正义大黄蜂？
Ultra Hornet, Hornet Platinum, Justice Hornet?
终极大黄蜂、铂金大黄蜂、正义大黄蜂？
@unclefart5527
Just an F with a Tesla robot in the back seat.
只是一个带着特斯拉机器人坐在后座的人。
Just an F with a Tesla robot in the back seat.
只是一个带着特斯拉机器人坐在后座的人。
@Jeff55369
@isaac_shelton f20 is already a jet... it's called the Tigershark. It's actually a pretty cool plane but it's contemporary with the other 4th gen planes.
@isaac_shelton F-20已经是一种喷气式飞机叫做“虎鲨”，实际上是一款相当酷的飞机，但它属于与其他第四代战机同时代的机型。
@isaac_shelton f20 is already a jet... it's called the Tigershark. It's actually a pretty cool plane but it's contemporary with the other 4th gen planes.
@isaac_shelton F-20已经是一种喷气式飞机叫做“虎鲨”，实际上是一款相当酷的飞机，但它属于与其他第四代战机同时代的机型。
@RobertWilliams-ox4hz
If its Grumman and they don't name it the Tomcat II then they are crazy
如果是格鲁曼公司制造的，而他们不把它命名为“雄猫II”那他们真是疯了。
If its Grumman and they don't name it the Tomcat II then they are crazy
如果是格鲁曼公司制造的，而他们不把它命名为“雄猫II”那他们真是疯了。
@Stinger522
A new fighter should have a new name. Constantly naming things Two, three, and four is just lazy.
新战士就应该有一个新名字，一直用“二”“三”“四”来命名实在太懒了。
A new fighter should have a new name. Constantly naming things Two, three, and four is just lazy.
新战士就应该有一个新名字，一直用“二”“三”“四”来命名实在太懒了。
@ryanhenderson4395
@RobertWilliams-ox4hz bingo…but it has to be the F-28 Tomcat II. F-14 x 2
@RobertWilliams-ox4hz 正解……但必须是F-28“雄猫II”，相当于F-14的两倍。
@RobertWilliams-ox4hz bingo…but it has to be the F-28 Tomcat II. F-14 x 2
@RobertWilliams-ox4hz 正解……但必须是F-28“雄猫II”，相当于F-14的两倍。
@boostedbadboyzx12r31
Watch we finally get the Mashup of F14 and F22 being the F-24 Tomcat II concept
我们终于能看到F-14和F-22的结合，形成了F-24“雄猫II”概念设计。
Watch we finally get the Mashup of F14 and F22 being the F-24 Tomcat II concept
我们终于能看到F-14和F-22的结合，形成了F-24“雄猫II”概念设计。
@succatash
F-45
@blakewu1375
They will name it TomCruise.
他们会把它命名为汤姆·克鲁斯。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
F-45
@blakewu1375
They will name it TomCruise.
他们会把它命名为汤姆·克鲁斯。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@debbiestimac5175
@ That would be wonderful to see, but the next U.S.S. Enterprise will most likely though be with Space Force.
那将会非常棒，不过下一艘U.S.S. Enterprise可能会属于太空部队。
@ That would be wonderful to see, but the next U.S.S. Enterprise will most likely though be with Space Force.
那将会非常棒，不过下一艘U.S.S. Enterprise可能会属于太空部队。
@PetesGuide
Not if it’s a single-seater.
如果只是单人座的话就不行。
Not if it’s a single-seater.
如果只是单人座的话就不行。
@winstonsyme7672
The repeat naming shit needs to stop. It just adds confusion, makes things harder to research, and dilutes the legacy of the original aircraft. It needs a good name, but it needs its own.
重复使用名称的行为真的该停止了，这不仅增加了混淆，也让相关资料查询变得更难，同时还削弱了原始机型的价值传承，它需要一个好的名字，但必须是独有的名字。
The repeat naming shit needs to stop. It just adds confusion, makes things harder to research, and dilutes the legacy of the original aircraft. It needs a good name, but it needs its own.
重复使用名称的行为真的该停止了，这不仅增加了混淆，也让相关资料查询变得更难，同时还削弱了原始机型的价值传承，它需要一个好的名字，但必须是独有的名字。
@trajhenkhet02
@SmedleyDouwright I like where your going with this but may I offer a new suggestion? The Battlecat; it carries twin engines designed by the most advanced classified tech of the 80's, fueled by the power of Eternia.
@SmedleyDouwright 我喜欢你的想法，但我能否提出一个新的建议？战斗猫，它搭载了由80年代最先进的机密技术设计的双引擎，并以永恒之地的力量作为能源。
@SmedleyDouwright I like where your going with this but may I offer a new suggestion? The Battlecat; it carries twin engines designed by the most advanced classified tech of the 80's, fueled by the power of Eternia.
@SmedleyDouwright 我喜欢你的想法，但我能否提出一个新的建议？战斗猫，它搭载了由80年代最先进的机密技术设计的双引擎，并以永恒之地的力量作为能源。
@JetWrenchFEX
Ooh! Can you imagine a stealth swing wing?
哦！你能想象一种隐形可变后掠翼吗？
Ooh! Can you imagine a stealth swing wing?
哦！你能想象一种隐形可变后掠翼吗？
@Epicredeemer
@debbiestimac5175 are you forgetting about CVN-80?
@debbiestimac5175 你是不是忘了CVN-80？
@debbiestimac5175 are you forgetting about CVN-80?
@debbiestimac5175 你是不是忘了CVN-80？
@joso5554
It’s Northrop Grumman now.
现在是诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It’s Northrop Grumman now.
现在是诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@JainZar1
@SmedleyDouwright 45 tons, with endo steel construction, ferrofibrous armour and two medium lasers and a Gauss rifle for weapons.
@SmedleyDouwright 这是一款45吨重的机体，采用内骨钢结构，配备铁纤维装甲，同时武器系统包括两门中型激光器和一门高斯步枪。
@SmedleyDouwright 45 tons, with endo steel construction, ferrofibrous armour and two medium lasers and a Gauss rifle for weapons.
@SmedleyDouwright 这是一款45吨重的机体，采用内骨钢结构，配备铁纤维装甲，同时武器系统包括两门中型激光器和一门高斯步枪。
@EndBy13
Im hoping they're naming it F/A-46 Seacat
4 for Wildcat
6 for Hellcat
我希望他们能把它命名为F/A-46海猫，其中4代表野猫，6代表地狱猫。
Im hoping they're naming it F/A-46 Seacat
4 for Wildcat
6 for Hellcat
我希望他们能把它命名为F/A-46海猫，其中4代表野猫，6代表地狱猫。
@kurtwagner350
Nah, I love the Tomcat but we need to create new cool creative names, not just hang on to the past.
不，我喜欢“雄猫”这个名字，但我们需要创造一些新的、酷炫且有创意的名字，而不是一味地沉迷于过去。
Nah, I love the Tomcat but we need to create new cool creative names, not just hang on to the past.
不，我喜欢“雄猫”这个名字，但我们需要创造一些新的、酷炫且有创意的名字，而不是一味地沉迷于过去。
@mountedpatrolman
It's going to be Northrop Grumman, it's already been leaked. Tomcat II
将由诺斯罗普·格鲁曼负责，这消息已经泄露了，应该是“雄猫 II”。
It's going to be Northrop Grumman, it's already been leaked. Tomcat II
将由诺斯罗普·格鲁曼负责，这消息已经泄露了，应该是“雄猫 II”。
@blurglide
The "Hell-oh Kitty"
“地狱喵喵”
The "Hell-oh Kitty"
“地狱喵喵”
@MartinSparks-ef9gr
No , it'll be called ....... the Trumpcat 47 .
不，它将被称为……川普猫47号。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
No , it'll be called ....... the Trumpcat 47 .
不，它将被称为……川普猫47号。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@axlefoxe
Why would you curse a jet like that when we already have fat Amy? Call it War Cat, Shadow cat, Panther or something. Tomcat was canceled for all the right reason, one amazing and iconic movie not withstanding.
为什么要给战机起这样的名字诅咒它呢，既然我们已经有了胖艾米？不如叫它战猫、影猫、黑豹什么的，雄猫战机之所以被取消是有充分理由的，尽管它在一部令人惊叹且标志性的电影中表现出色。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Why would you curse a jet like that when we already have fat Amy? Call it War Cat, Shadow cat, Panther or something. Tomcat was canceled for all the right reason, one amazing and iconic movie not withstanding.
为什么要给战机起这样的名字诅咒它呢，既然我们已经有了胖艾米？不如叫它战猫、影猫、黑豹什么的，雄猫战机之所以被取消是有充分理由的，尽管它在一部令人惊叹且标志性的电影中表现出色。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@debbiestimac5175
@ Mathematics would like to have a conversation... stealth is the result of calculations concerning radar energy reflection/angles of incidence. Swing wing cannot be stealth, you will create a non-stealth profile as the wing moves from position to position.
@ Mathematics 希望进行一次讨论……隐身效果其实是通过对雷达能量反射和入射角度进行计算得出的，采用可变翼设计无法实现隐身，当机翼从一个位置移动到另一个位置时会生成一个非隐身的外形。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@ Mathematics would like to have a conversation... stealth is the result of calculations concerning radar energy reflection/angles of incidence. Swing wing cannot be stealth, you will create a non-stealth profile as the wing moves from position to position.
@ Mathematics 希望进行一次讨论……隐身效果其实是通过对雷达能量反射和入射角度进行计算得出的，采用可变翼设计无法实现隐身，当机翼从一个位置移动到另一个位置时会生成一个非隐身的外形。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@georgeburns7251
The Trumpcat. It will be really fast. It will do 2. It will be the most beautiful jet. It will be stored in a shed. It has been flying for 5 years already.
特朗普猫，这将会非常快，它能够完成二倍的速度，这将是最漂亮的喷气机，它会被存放在一个棚子里，它已经飞行了5年之久。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The Trumpcat. It will be really fast. It will do 2. It will be the most beautiful jet. It will be stored in a shed. It has been flying for 5 years already.
特朗普猫，这将会非常快，它能够完成二倍的速度，这将是最漂亮的喷气机，它会被存放在一个棚子里，它已经飞行了5年之久。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@georgeburns7251
They will name it Trumpcat.
他们会给它取名为特朗普猫。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
They will name it Trumpcat.
他们会给它取名为特朗普猫。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@blurglide
DonCat
唐猫 （唐纳德川普）
DonCat
唐猫 （唐纳德川普）
@nfuryboss
The range requirements mean that it has two engines and a larger airfrx like a Tomcat size.
航程需求意味着这架飞机需要配备双引擎，并且机身尺寸要更大，类似于F-14“雄猫”战斗机的大小。
The range requirements mean that it has two engines and a larger airfrx like a Tomcat size.
航程需求意味着这架飞机需要配备双引擎，并且机身尺寸要更大，类似于F-14“雄猫”战斗机的大小。
@robertprice7791
The plane Northrop had in their ads seems similar to this.
诺斯罗普广告中的飞机似乎和这个很相似。
The plane Northrop had in their ads seems similar to this.
诺斯罗普广告中的飞机似乎和这个很相似。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
That is not necessarily true but the Navy does have a great attachment to their second engine. Never mind that it drives cost, maintenance and fuel consumption for a negligible if any increase in reliability.
那倒未必完全正确，但海军确实对他们的第二发动机有很深的依赖，尽管它导致了成本、维护和燃料消耗的增加，而可靠性提升却微乎其微甚至可以忽略不计。
That is not necessarily true but the Navy does have a great attachment to their second engine. Never mind that it drives cost, maintenance and fuel consumption for a negligible if any increase in reliability.
那倒未必完全正确，但海军确实对他们的第二发动机有很深的依赖，尽管它导致了成本、维护和燃料消耗的增加，而可靠性提升却微乎其微甚至可以忽略不计。
@Shadow__133
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs It's only negligible until you lose an engine over enemy territory
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 在敌方领土失去一台发动机后，这可就完全不值得忽略了
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs It's only negligible until you lose an engine over enemy territory
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 在敌方领土失去一台发动机后，这可就完全不值得忽略了
@VonGoth
@Shadow__133 Or over the Ocean. Where it will be 90% of the time.
@Shadow__133 或者是在海洋上，毕竟90%的时间都会在那里。
@Shadow__133 Or over the Ocean. Where it will be 90% of the time.
@Shadow__133 或者是在海洋上，毕竟90%的时间都会在那里。
@VonGoth
@robertprice7791 The New Engines in the F-22 will give it more Thrust than the SR-71 Blackbird had. If they sneak those into the FA-XX with 2 Engines.... YIKES!
@robertprice7791 F-22的新发动机将提供比SR-71“黑鸟”更多的推力，如果他们把这种发动机塞进带有两台发动机的FA-XX中......那简直令人惊叹！
@robertprice7791 The New Engines in the F-22 will give it more Thrust than the SR-71 Blackbird had. If they sneak those into the FA-XX with 2 Engines.... YIKES!
@robertprice7791 F-22的新发动机将提供比SR-71“黑鸟”更多的推力，如果他们把这种发动机塞进带有两台发动机的FA-XX中......那简直令人惊叹！
@PJH13
@VonGoth The f22 has two engines already...
@VonGoth F22战斗机本来就配备了两台发动机。
@VonGoth The f22 has two engines already...
@VonGoth F22战斗机本来就配备了两台发动机。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
@Shadow__133 You may need to look up the meaning of negligible.
@Shadow__133 你可能需要查一下“微不足道”的意思。
@Shadow__133 You may need to look up the meaning of negligible.
@Shadow__133 你可能需要查一下“微不足道”的意思。
@Shadow__133
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs “Negligible” means something that is so small or unimportant that it can be disregarded or ignored.
Looking that up was 1000x easier than finding another engine if you happened to lose the one and only one you had.
@"Negligible" 的意思是指某事物非常微小或不重要，可以忽略或不被重视。查找这个意思远比在失去了唯一的引擎后试图寻找另一个引擎容易一千倍。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs “Negligible” means something that is so small or unimportant that it can be disregarded or ignored.
Looking that up was 1000x easier than finding another engine if you happened to lose the one and only one you had.
@"Negligible" 的意思是指某事物非常微小或不重要，可以忽略或不被重视。查找这个意思远比在失去了唯一的引擎后试图寻找另一个引擎容易一千倍。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
@Shadow__133 And yet your understanding of the definition you regurgitated seems to be even more elusive.
If you had any understanding of the domain you might grasp that that extra engine is not your lifeline. It is much more likely to save your life by being down and keeping you out of the fight than it is to be what gets you home.
@Shadow__133 看起来你对你复述的定义理解得还不够透彻。
如果你对这个领域有任何了解，你可能就会明白，那额外的引擎并不是你的生命线，它更可能因为故障让你退出战斗而救了你一命，而不是成为让你安全回家的关键。
@Shadow__133 And yet your understanding of the definition you regurgitated seems to be even more elusive.
If you had any understanding of the domain you might grasp that that extra engine is not your lifeline. It is much more likely to save your life by being down and keeping you out of the fight than it is to be what gets you home.
@Shadow__133 看起来你对你复述的定义理解得还不够透彻。
如果你对这个领域有任何了解，你可能就会明白，那额外的引擎并不是你的生命线，它更可能因为故障让你退出战斗而救了你一命，而不是成为让你安全回家的关键。
@FreedomandBaconHomestead
What a time to be alive - two generational planes in less than a week.
活在这样的时代真是令人感慨，一周内竟然见证了两架跨时代意义的飞机。
What a time to be alive - two generational planes in less than a week.
活在这样的时代真是令人感慨，一周内竟然见证了两架跨时代意义的飞机。
@unclefart5527
Still not the Century series.
仍然不是世纪系列。
Still not the Century series.
仍然不是世纪系列。
@matthewmcpherson8831
@FreedomandBaconHomestead and unlike chinas jokes that flew a while back these will actually be working 6th generation platforms
@FreedomandBaconHomestead，与此前中国那些玩笑般的概念不同，这些将真正成为可投入使用的第六代平台。
@FreedomandBaconHomestead and unlike chinas jokes that flew a while back these will actually be working 6th generation platforms
@FreedomandBaconHomestead，与此前中国那些玩笑般的概念不同，这些将真正成为可投入使用的第六代平台。
@a.m.9357
@matthewmcpherson8831 Lol... Don't forget to take your meds. These are the last days of the dying Yankee empire. Bye bye.
@matthewmcpherson8831 哈哈…… 别忘了吃药啊。这是快要崩溃的美帝国最后的日子了，再见啦。
@matthewmcpherson8831 Lol... Don't forget to take your meds. These are the last days of the dying Yankee empire. Bye bye.
@matthewmcpherson8831 哈哈…… 别忘了吃药啊。这是快要崩溃的美帝国最后的日子了，再见啦。
@smyers820gm
@a.m.9357 don’t start schitt you can’t handle. You don’t want to be on the wrong team against the F/A-xx FAFO
@a.m.9357 别找事儿，别惹了你应付不了的麻烦。你可不想站错队对上F/A-xx FAFO
@a.m.9357 don’t start schitt you can’t handle. You don’t want to be on the wrong team against the F/A-xx FAFO
@a.m.9357 别找事儿，别惹了你应付不了的麻烦。你可不想站错队对上F/A-xx FAFO
@AVWUVU
@matthewmcpherson8831 Show something not on a PPT first. The only "6th" gen you guys have is photoshop. China just did their third flying test today of the J36. Get used to staying down.
@matthewmcpherson8831 先展示一些非PPT上的东西吧，你们所谓的“第六”代不过是PS的，中国的J36今天刚刚进行了第三次试飞，习惯一下被压倒的感觉吧。
@matthewmcpherson8831 Show something not on a PPT first. The only "6th" gen you guys have is photoshop. China just did their third flying test today of the J36. Get used to staying down.
@matthewmcpherson8831 先展示一些非PPT上的东西吧，你们所谓的“第六”代不过是PS的，中国的J36今天刚刚进行了第三次试飞，习惯一下被压倒的感觉吧。
@matthewmcpherson8831
@ they flew two clunky planes and called them 6gen, sorry but I bet you think their aircraft carriers are better also. Might want to get your delusions checked
他们飞了两架笨重的飞机就称它们为六代机，抱歉，我猜你可能还觉得他们的航母更厉害，或许你应该好好检查一下自己的幻觉。
@ they flew two clunky planes and called them 6gen, sorry but I bet you think their aircraft carriers are better also. Might want to get your delusions checked
他们飞了两架笨重的飞机就称它们为六代机，抱歉，我猜你可能还觉得他们的航母更厉害，或许你应该好好检查一下自己的幻觉。
@jialongtian
@matthewmcpherson8831 Why does the F-47 use canards as well？Didn't they used to mock the canards of the J-20 before？
@matthewmcpherson8831 为什么F-47也使用了鸭翼？之前他们不是还嘲笑过歼-20的鸭翼设计吗？
@matthewmcpherson8831 Why does the F-47 use canards as well？Didn't they used to mock the canards of the J-20 before？
@matthewmcpherson8831 为什么F-47也使用了鸭翼？之前他们不是还嘲笑过歼-20的鸭翼设计吗？
@rush_17
@AVWUVU Actually we have the B-21 6th Generation stealth bomber. Technically the first 6th gen to be videoed flying
实际上，我们拥有B-21第六代隐形轰炸机，可以说是第一次被拍到在空中飞行的第六代轰炸机。
@AVWUVU Actually we have the B-21 6th Generation stealth bomber. Technically the first 6th gen to be videoed flying
实际上，我们拥有B-21第六代隐形轰炸机，可以说是第一次被拍到在空中飞行的第六代轰炸机。
@rush_17
@jialongtian The removal of the F-47's vertical stabilizers reduce the RCS enough to allow canards to be viable ..
@jialongtian 移除F-47的垂直稳定器降低了雷达截面积，从而使前翼设计成为了可行方案。
@jialongtian The removal of the F-47's vertical stabilizers reduce the RCS enough to allow canards to be viable ..
@jialongtian 移除F-47的垂直稳定器降低了雷达截面积，从而使前翼设计成为了可行方案。
@jialongtian
@rush_17 okok
@rush_17 好的好的
@rush_17 okok
@rush_17 好的好的
@Bytional
@rush_17 how much copium have u taken bro, u need to slow down.
@rush_17 兄弟，你吸了多少自我安慰鸦片啊，真的该缓缓了。
@rush_17 how much copium have u taken bro, u need to slow down.
@rush_17 兄弟，你吸了多少自我安慰鸦片啊，真的该缓缓了。
@navypowertv
Thanks
谢谢
Thanks
谢谢
@cosinesinetangent7440
@zaco-km3su what because it’s boeing
因为这是波音，所以这样。
@zaco-km3su what because it’s boeing
因为这是波音，所以这样。
@abdusalamolamide
@a.m.9357 lol.. dont mind him. He hasnt gotten over it. he is still in denial that their edge has eroded....
哈哈，不用理他，他还没能释怀，仍然否认他们的优势已经不复存在了。
@a.m.9357 lol.. dont mind him. He hasnt gotten over it. he is still in denial that their edge has eroded....
哈哈，不用理他，他还没能释怀，仍然否认他们的优势已经不复存在了。
@Turtle90s
@matthewmcpherson8831 yup and China should be worried about Japan Gen 6 they working on
@matthewmcpherson8831 是的，中国应该担心日本正在研发的第六代战机。
@matthewmcpherson8831 yup and China should be worried about Japan Gen 6 they working on
@matthewmcpherson8831 是的，中国应该担心日本正在研发的第六代战机。
@kerbodynamicx472
Two PowerPoints- not real planes. They are likely still a decade away from service
这只是两个概念展示，并不是真正的飞机，距离正式投入使用很可能还有十年的时间。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Two PowerPoints- not real planes. They are likely still a decade away from service
这只是两个概念展示，并不是真正的飞机，距离正式投入使用很可能还有十年的时间。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@SkyDawg91
I’ll be surprised if either of them ever fly
如果他们中的任何一个能飞，我都会感到惊讶。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I’ll be surprised if either of them ever fly
如果他们中的任何一个能飞，我都会感到惊讶。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@KC_Smooth
Grumman, I believe you can win this! Also, make it a 2 seater so the WSO can focus on controlling drones. We need a futuristic Tom Cat!
格鲁曼，我相信你一定能赢！另外，设计成双座机，让武器系统操作员专注于控制无人机，我们需要一款充满未来感的雄猫战机！
Grumman, I believe you can win this! Also, make it a 2 seater so the WSO can focus on controlling drones. We need a futuristic Tom Cat!
格鲁曼，我相信你一定能赢！另外，设计成双座机，让武器系统操作员专注于控制无人机，我们需要一款充满未来感的雄猫战机！
@debbiestimac5175
Drones are controlled/initiated/monitored via Satellite Data lix... no need for a back seater.
无人机通过卫星数据链进行控制、启动和监测，因此不需要后座操作员。
Drones are controlled/initiated/monitored via Satellite Data lix... no need for a back seater.
无人机通过卫星数据链进行控制、启动和监测，因此不需要后座操作员。
@UnderEuropa
it sounded like for the f47 the flight of the actual jet would be largely autonomous, and the pilot could likely be free to be managing weapons and drones
听起来，对于F47实际战机的飞行将主要以自主操作为主，飞行员很可能可以专注于管理武器和无人机。
it sounded like for the f47 the flight of the actual jet would be largely autonomous, and the pilot could likely be free to be managing weapons and drones
听起来，对于F47实际战机的飞行将主要以自主操作为主，飞行员很可能可以专注于管理武器和无人机。
@trollmastermike52845
@debbiestimac5175 that's sounds like it has a massive amount of latency and very easily jammed more so than normal.
Seem like more things can go wrong and will go wrong
@debbiestimac5175 听起来这种方式存在大量延迟，且比常规方式更容易受到干扰，甚至被完全阻塞，看起来问题会更多，也更容易出问题。
@debbiestimac5175 that's sounds like it has a massive amount of latency and very easily jammed more so than normal.
Seem like more things can go wrong and will go wrong
@debbiestimac5175 听起来这种方式存在大量延迟，且比常规方式更容易受到干扰，甚至被完全阻塞，看起来问题会更多，也更容易出问题。
@foxglow6798
Actually it’s looking like the pilot is going to be a WSO himself and the flight of the aircraft will be completely autonomous.
实际上看起来驾驶员自己将是武器系统操作员，而飞机的飞行将完全自主进行。
Actually it’s looking like the pilot is going to be a WSO himself and the flight of the aircraft will be completely autonomous.
实际上看起来驾驶员自己将是武器系统操作员，而飞机的飞行将完全自主进行。
@marsmotion
revenge of the yf23
YF-23的复仇
revenge of the yf23
YF-23的复仇
@King_Dusty_Of_Pookytopia
The navy should allow Sandboxx the first reveal of its NGAD.
I want to name it the FA-28 Murder Hornet...
海军应该允许Sandboxx首次公开其下一代制空战机（NGAD），我想把它命名为“FA-28杀人蜂”...
The navy should allow Sandboxx the first reveal of its NGAD.
I want to name it the FA-28 Murder Hornet...
海军应该允许Sandboxx首次公开其下一代制空战机（NGAD），我想把它命名为“FA-28杀人蜂”...
@matthewmcpherson8831
@King_Dusty_Of_Pookytopia ngad is the 47 fa/xx is the navy’s
@King_Dusty_Of_Pookytopia ngad是第47，fa/xx是海军的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@King_Dusty_Of_Pookytopia ngad is the 47 fa/xx is the navy’s
@King_Dusty_Of_Pookytopia ngad是第47，fa/xx是海军的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@fredeb67
Murder Hornets are an Asian species.
杀人蜂是一种亚洲物种。
Murder Hornets are an Asian species.
杀人蜂是一种亚洲物种。
@Digmen1
I hope the USA can keep all those 3 companies going.
They need competition (design and price) and multiple factories etc
我希望美国能够让这三家公司持续运营，因为他们需要竞争来提升设计和价格，同时也需要多家工厂等资源来支持发展。
I hope the USA can keep all those 3 companies going.
They need competition (design and price) and multiple factories etc
我希望美国能够让这三家公司持续运营，因为他们需要竞争来提升设计和价格，同时也需要多家工厂等资源来支持发展。
@matthewmcpherson8831
@Digmen1 they try to throw each company a bone but it goes further as there are several smaller companies that parasite off the big ones and get the side contracts
@Digmen1 他们试图给每家公司一点甜头，但事情更加复杂，因为还有一些小公司依附于大公司，通过获得侧面合同来获利。
@Digmen1 they try to throw each company a bone but it goes further as there are several smaller companies that parasite off the big ones and get the side contracts
@Digmen1 他们试图给每家公司一点甜头，但事情更加复杂，因为还有一些小公司依附于大公司，通过获得侧面合同来获利。
@tonysu8860
AFAIK the Defdnse dept did NGAD and FX-XX differently than prior procurement programs. Instead of inviting companies to a design competition and fly-off, for these two programs the Defdnse dept received contributions from the competitors that were then melded into a common design and manufacturing of that common design would then be awarded to someone.
So no there won't be an aircraft that looks like the F-14 and if there will be a Tomcat it'll be in name only. More likely it'll look like the Chinese J-36 but will be much better. And, I expect whoever builds it will be turning it out like hotcakes using advanced manufacturing faster than any aircraft has been built before.
据我所知，国防部在执行NGAD和FX-XX这两个项目时采用了与以往采购计划不同的方式。过去通常是通过设计竞赛和试飞选出一个方案，而这两个项目中，国防部选择汇集竞标公司提交的设计，将其融合成一个通用设计，然后将该通用设计的制造工作授予某家企业。
所以，不会有类似F-14的飞机出现。如果未来有"雄猫"（Tomcat），那也仅仅是一个名字上的延续。更可能的是，它的外形会类似于中国的J-36，但将表现得更加出色。此外，我预计无论哪家公司中标，都将通过先进的制造技术，以空前的速度像生产热蛋糕一样大规模制造这些飞机。
AFAIK the Defdnse dept did NGAD and FX-XX differently than prior procurement programs. Instead of inviting companies to a design competition and fly-off, for these two programs the Defdnse dept received contributions from the competitors that were then melded into a common design and manufacturing of that common design would then be awarded to someone.
So no there won't be an aircraft that looks like the F-14 and if there will be a Tomcat it'll be in name only. More likely it'll look like the Chinese J-36 but will be much better. And, I expect whoever builds it will be turning it out like hotcakes using advanced manufacturing faster than any aircraft has been built before.
据我所知，国防部在执行NGAD和FX-XX这两个项目时采用了与以往采购计划不同的方式。过去通常是通过设计竞赛和试飞选出一个方案，而这两个项目中，国防部选择汇集竞标公司提交的设计，将其融合成一个通用设计，然后将该通用设计的制造工作授予某家企业。
所以，不会有类似F-14的飞机出现。如果未来有"雄猫"（Tomcat），那也仅仅是一个名字上的延续。更可能的是，它的外形会类似于中国的J-36，但将表现得更加出色。此外，我预计无论哪家公司中标，都将通过先进的制造技术，以空前的速度像生产热蛋糕一样大规模制造这些飞机。
@fakshen1973
Grumman should name it "The Shadow Cat." It sounds cool and "sending in the Shadows" sounds epic.
格鲁曼应该把它命名为“暗影猫”，这个名字听起来很酷，“派遣暗影”听起来史诗级。
Grumman should name it "The Shadow Cat." It sounds cool and "sending in the Shadows" sounds epic.
格鲁曼应该把它命名为“暗影猫”，这个名字听起来很酷，“派遣暗影”听起来史诗级。
@JetleanSam
GRUMMAN GRUMMAN GRUMMAN WE SO BACK BOYS.
格鲁曼，格鲁曼，格鲁曼，我们回来了，兄弟们！
GRUMMAN GRUMMAN GRUMMAN WE SO BACK BOYS.
格鲁曼，格鲁曼，格鲁曼，我们回来了，兄弟们！
@JSFGuy
YELLING ABOUT IT
大声喊出来。
YELLING ABOUT IT
大声喊出来。
@spyder8986
He'll yah.
好耶。
He'll yah.
好耶。
@TymaDem
@JetleanSam we don't know the winner, stop yelling
@JetleanSam 我们还不知道谁是赢家，别喊了。
@JetleanSam we don't know the winner, stop yelling
@JetleanSam 我们还不知道谁是赢家，别喊了。
@CircaSriYak
YF23 or nothing
YF23才是王道，没有其他选择
YF23 or nothing
YF23才是王道，没有其他选择
@JCMills55
@CircaSriYak I was thinking if Northrop builds it has to be "the Black Widow"
我在想，如果是由诺斯罗普建造，那就一定得叫“黑寡妇”。
@CircaSriYak I was thinking if Northrop builds it has to be "the Black Widow"
我在想，如果是由诺斯罗普建造，那就一定得叫“黑寡妇”。
@Stinger522
If they are the winner.
如果他们是赢家。
If they are the winner.
如果他们是赢家。
@tiju.j
Boeing can build it for half the cost since they already have NGAD.
波音可以以一半的成本建造它，因为他们已经拥有下一代空中主导项目（NGAD）。
Boeing can build it for half the cost since they already have NGAD.
波音可以以一半的成本建造它，因为他们已经拥有下一代空中主导项目（NGAD）。
@Stinger522
@tiju.j Putting both eggs in the Boeing basket would be a bad idea. I expect the F-47 to be a dumpster fire under Boeing and the USAF settling for the F/A-XX like they did with the F-4 Phantom.
@tiju.j 把所有的希望都寄托在波音身上会是一个糟糕的选择，我预计在波音的管理下，F-47可能会成为一个彻底的失败，而美国空军可能会像他们当初接受F-4幽灵那样，最终妥协选择F/A-XX。
@tiju.j Putting both eggs in the Boeing basket would be a bad idea. I expect the F-47 to be a dumpster fire under Boeing and the USAF settling for the F/A-XX like they did with the F-4 Phantom.
@tiju.j 把所有的希望都寄托在波音身上会是一个糟糕的选择，我预计在波音的管理下，F-47可能会成为一个彻底的失败，而美国空军可能会像他们当初接受F-4幽灵那样，最终妥协选择F/A-XX。
@ZachPackage
@Stinger522 I’ve been hearing from insiders the program was already fairly mature, hence winning the contract. I think they’ll be fine. Phantom works isn’t BCA and alot of the old leadership is out.
@Stinger522 我听内部人士说，这个项目已经相当成熟了，所以才能赢得合同。我觉得他们会没问题的。Phantom Works不是BCA，而且很多旧领导层已经离开了。
@Stinger522 I’ve been hearing from insiders the program was already fairly mature, hence winning the contract. I think they’ll be fine. Phantom works isn’t BCA and alot of the old leadership is out.
@Stinger522 我听内部人士说，这个项目已经相当成熟了，所以才能赢得合同。我觉得他们会没问题的。Phantom Works不是BCA，而且很多旧领导层已经离开了。
@T.Collins-p1d
@tiju.j they could, but they wouldn’t.
@tiju.j 他们本可以做到，但他们不会去做。
@tiju.j they could, but they wouldn’t.
@tiju.j 他们本可以做到，但他们不会去做。
@DanielPrimeRN
What if I told you this airfrx, which might be unofficially referred to as NSF, or Naval Stealth Fighter, has been openly flying in and around Guam for years...
如果我告诉你，这种可能被非正式称为NSF（海军隐形战斗机）的机体已经多年来在关岛及其周边公开飞行，你会怎么想呢？
What if I told you this airfrx, which might be unofficially referred to as NSF, or Naval Stealth Fighter, has been openly flying in and around Guam for years...
如果我告诉你，这种可能被非正式称为NSF（海军隐形战斗机）的机体已经多年来在关岛及其周边公开飞行，你会怎么想呢？
@TymaDem
@DanielPrimeRN the source is “trust me bro”?
@DanielPrimeRN 所谓的“相信我，兄弟”就是你的来源吗？
@DanielPrimeRN the source is “trust me bro”?
@DanielPrimeRN 所谓的“相信我，兄弟”就是你的来源吗？
@danielc9312
@tiju.j not necessarily true especially given that these will not use the same platform. The Navy had very distinct requirements which is why it split from the NGAD program in the first place
@tiju.j 不一定如此，尤其是考虑到这些不会使用相同的平台。海军有非常独特的需求，这也是它当初为什么从NGAD项目中独立出来的原因。
@tiju.j not necessarily true especially given that these will not use the same platform. The Navy had very distinct requirements which is why it split from the NGAD program in the first place
@tiju.j 不一定如此，尤其是考虑到这些不会使用相同的平台。海军有非常独特的需求，这也是它当初为什么从NGAD项目中独立出来的原因。
@danielc9312
@DanielPrimeRN I wouldn’t be surprised at all if a naval tech demonstrator was already flying around like the NGAD demonstrator. It seems like some of these programs had some maturity to their development but were just waiting for signatures from the top.
@DanielPrimeRN 我完全不会感到惊讶，如果一个海军技术验证机已经像下一代空中优势战斗机（NGAD）的验证机一样在空中飞行，这些项目看起来已经拥有一定的成熟度，只是一直在等待高层的批准。
@DanielPrimeRN I wouldn’t be surprised at all if a naval tech demonstrator was already flying around like the NGAD demonstrator. It seems like some of these programs had some maturity to their development but were just waiting for signatures from the top.
@DanielPrimeRN 我完全不会感到惊讶，如果一个海军技术验证机已经像下一代空中优势战斗机（NGAD）的验证机一样在空中飞行，这些项目看起来已经拥有一定的成熟度，只是一直在等待高层的批准。
@JetleanSam
@ Naval aviation stays winning.
海航永远是赢家。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@ Naval aviation stays winning.
海航永远是赢家。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@thomasblankinship98
@tiju.j Boeing is ha ing trouble building airlines that don't fallout of the sky. The low balled the bid on the NGAD. Knowing they can later on throw in cost over runs, and price increases .
@tiju.j 波音公司正面临难以制造不会从天上掉下来的飞机的问题，他们在下一代空中优势战斗机（NGAD）的竞标中压低了报价，因为他们知道之后可以借机增加成本超支和提价。
@tiju.j Boeing is ha ing trouble building airlines that don't fallout of the sky. The low balled the bid on the NGAD. Knowing they can later on throw in cost over runs, and price increases .
@tiju.j 波音公司正面临难以制造不会从天上掉下来的飞机的问题，他们在下一代空中优势战斗机（NGAD）的竞标中压低了报价，因为他们知道之后可以借机增加成本超支和提价。
@TheLAGopher
@Stinger522
And Boeing has so many production issues outside the F-15 EX and the P-8. It just doesn't make sense to start up 2 fighter production lines
at the same company. Northrop Grumman is moving along fine with the B-21, so it makes sense to give them the Navy fighter contract.
@Stinger522
波音在F-15 EX和P-8之外还有许多生产问题，因此在同一家公司启动两条战斗机生产线显得毫无意义，而诺斯罗普·格鲁曼的B-21项目进展顺利，因此将海军战斗机合同交给他们更为合理。
@Stinger522
And Boeing has so many production issues outside the F-15 EX and the P-8. It just doesn't make sense to start up 2 fighter production lines
at the same company. Northrop Grumman is moving along fine with the B-21, so it makes sense to give them the Navy fighter contract.
@Stinger522
波音在F-15 EX和P-8之外还有许多生产问题，因此在同一家公司启动两条战斗机生产线显得毫无意义，而诺斯罗普·格鲁曼的B-21项目进展顺利，因此将海军战斗机合同交给他们更为合理。
@stevesmith6385
Northrup?
诺思罗普？
Northrup?
诺思罗普？
@iselfidentifyah64eapache
US carrier decks need to have cats back on it.
Imagine the Ford-class Enterprise with Grumman cats on it. Grumman Ironworks baby!
美国的航母甲板需要重新安装弹射器，想象一下福特级的企业号航母上配备格鲁曼的弹射器，格鲁曼铁工厂威武！
US carrier decks need to have cats back on it.
Imagine the Ford-class Enterprise with Grumman cats on it. Grumman Ironworks baby!
美国的航母甲板需要重新安装弹射器，想象一下福特级的企业号航母上配备格鲁曼的弹射器，格鲁曼铁工厂威武！
@Psych1_-
@Stinger522 They said it's been flying for 5 years. Hopefully that means it's a reliable plane. Boeing has had some rough years
@Stinger522 他们说这架飞机已经飞行了5年，希望这意味着它是一架可靠的飞机，波音这些年确实经历了一段艰难时期。
@Stinger522 They said it's been flying for 5 years. Hopefully that means it's a reliable plane. Boeing has had some rough years
@Stinger522 他们说这架飞机已经飞行了5年，希望这意味着它是一架可靠的飞机，波音这些年确实经历了一段艰难时期。
@mattmcc72
Give that Trump just used F-47 for the AF, what's the betting that it's the F-45 for the Navy?
鉴于特朗普刚刚为空军采用了F-47，你们觉得海军会选用F-45的可能性有多大？
Give that Trump just used F-47 for the AF, what's the betting that it's the F-45 for the Navy?
鉴于特朗普刚刚为空军采用了F-47，你们觉得海军会选用F-45的可能性有多大？
@NuclearFalcon146
Ever play VTOL VR? The F-45 in that game is honestly pretty fun.
你有没有玩过《VTOL VR》？游戏里的F-45真的挺有意思的。
Ever play VTOL VR? The F-45 in that game is honestly pretty fun.
你有没有玩过《VTOL VR》？游戏里的F-45真的挺有意思的。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
Surely no one has that much ego...
肯定没有人自负到那种程度吧。
Surely no one has that much ego...
肯定没有人自负到那种程度吧。
@bowencreer3922
I hope that’s what happens. Epic planes for an epic president.
我希望事情会是这样的，宏伟的飞机配得上这位非凡的总统。
I hope that’s what happens. Epic planes for an epic president.
我希望事情会是这样的，宏伟的飞机配得上这位非凡的总统。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
@ He is sure trying to make this term epic. Probably compensating for how badly his first term went. Its really tough for an idiot narcissists to accept these types of failures. The results may be bad but the show will be epic.
他显然在努力让这一任期显得壮观，可能是为了弥补他第一任期表现得如此糟糕，对一个愚蠢的自恋者来说要接受这样的失败确实非常困难，结果可能会很糟糕，但这场表演肯定会很具有戏剧性。
@ He is sure trying to make this term epic. Probably compensating for how badly his first term went. Its really tough for an idiot narcissists to accept these types of failures. The results may be bad but the show will be epic.
他显然在努力让这一任期显得壮观，可能是为了弥补他第一任期表现得如此糟糕，对一个愚蠢的自恋者来说要接受这样的失败确实非常困难，结果可能会很糟糕，但这场表演肯定会很具有戏剧性。
@john_in_phoenix
The F-47 better be called Thunderbolt 2.
F-47应该叫雷霆二型更合适。
The F-47 better be called Thunderbolt 2.
F-47应该叫雷霆二型更合适。
@maxblumenfeld5824
@john_in_phoenix uhh my man it’d have to be thunderbolt III. A-10 is technically thunderbolt II
@john_in_phoenix 兄弟，那应该是雷电三吧，A-10其实是雷电二。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@john_in_phoenix uhh my man it’d have to be thunderbolt III. A-10 is technically thunderbolt II
@john_in_phoenix 兄弟，那应该是雷电三吧，A-10其实是雷电二。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@verdebusterAP
@john_in_phoenix thunderbolt was already used by the A-10
@john_in_phoenix 雷霆已经被A-10攻击机使用过了
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@john_in_phoenix thunderbolt was already used by the A-10
@john_in_phoenix 雷霆已经被A-10攻击机使用过了
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@kurtwagner350
At least that numbering kinda makes sense. I’m more worried they’ll name it F-50-something
至少这种编号方式还算有点道理，我更担心他们会把它命名为F-50多一点的东西。
At least that numbering kinda makes sense. I’m more worried they’ll name it F-50-something
至少这种编号方式还算有点道理，我更担心他们会把它命名为F-50多一点的东西。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
@john_in_phoenix That is no less original than any of the other "2" suggestions.
@john_in_phoenix 那和其他所有的“2”号建议一样毫无新意。
@john_in_phoenix That is no less original than any of the other "2" suggestions.
@john_in_phoenix 那和其他所有的“2”号建议一样毫无新意。
@JojoJoget
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs i mean he bankrupted 3 casinos and now on his way to bankrupt the whole country,of course he does.
我指的是他让三家赌场破产，现在正准备让整个国家破产，当然他会这样做。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs i mean he bankrupted 3 casinos and now on his way to bankrupt the whole country,of course he does.
我指的是他让三家赌场破产，现在正准备让整个国家破产，当然他会这样做。
@helmsscotta
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs : Speaking as someone who generally supports Trump policies? Yes, he can absolutely be that egotistical.
作为一个通常支持特朗普政策的人来说？是的，他绝对有可能那么自负。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs : Speaking as someone who generally supports Trump policies? Yes, he can absolutely be that egotistical.
作为一个通常支持特朗普政策的人来说？是的，他绝对有可能那么自负。
@travisedmonds4214
To serve on the CV47 Uss Donald Trump.
在 CV47 USS 唐纳德·特朗普号上服役。
To serve on the CV47 Uss Donald Trump.
在 CV47 USS 唐纳德·特朗普号上服役。
@bariman223
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs I sympathize, but look at history. Yes, someone definitely can. We're talking about someone who likes having his name displayed on the sides of his buildings.
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 我很能理解，但看看历史吧，是的，有人确实能做到。我们说的是一个喜欢把自己的名字挂在自己建筑侧面的人。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs I sympathize, but look at history. Yes, someone definitely can. We're talking about someone who likes having his name displayed on the sides of his buildings.
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 我很能理解，但看看历史吧，是的，有人确实能做到。我们说的是一个喜欢把自己的名字挂在自己建筑侧面的人。
@angusmatheson8906
Trump didn't name it.
特朗普没有提到它。
Trump didn't name it.
特朗普没有提到它。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
@helmsscotta I support many of the things he says he wants to accomplish. The things he actually does frequently do not align with the stated goals. That he gets away with that just feeds his ego.
@helmsscotta 我支持他所说的许多想要实现的目标，但他实际所做的事情往往与这些声明的目标不一致，而他能够逃避责任只是进一步助长了他的自负。
@helmsscotta I support many of the things he says he wants to accomplish. The things he actually does frequently do not align with the stated goals. That he gets away with that just feeds his ego.
@helmsscotta 我支持他所说的许多想要实现的目标，但他实际所做的事情往往与这些声明的目标不一致，而他能够逃避责任只是进一步助长了他的自负。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
@angusmatheson8906 There is some debate about that. Either way though it seems so on brand that it is hard to dismiss.
@angusmatheson8906 关于这点还有一些争议，不过不管怎么说，这似乎非常符合风格，很难让人忽视。
@angusmatheson8906 There is some debate about that. Either way though it seems so on brand that it is hard to dismiss.
@angusmatheson8906 关于这点还有一些争议，不过不管怎么说，这似乎非常符合风格，很难让人忽视。
@GregAcer
F48
@matthewmcpherson8831
That was my thought,lol
那正是我的想法，哈哈。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
F48
@matthewmcpherson8831
That was my thought,lol
那正是我的想法，哈哈。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@blurglide
DonCat
DonCat（唐猫）
DonCat
DonCat（唐猫）
@ShaperOfThings
I came here to say the same
我来这里就是想表达同样的意思。
I came here to say the same
我来这里就是想表达同样的意思。
@bl8danjil
@JojoJoget Oof, last president had a 9% inflation rate one year into his presidency.
@JojoJoget 噢，上任总统在任期开始一年的时候就达到了9%的通货膨胀率。
@JojoJoget Oof, last president had a 9% inflation rate one year into his presidency.
@JojoJoget 噢，上任总统在任期开始一年的时候就达到了9%的通货膨胀率。
@mfallen2023
@kurtwagner350 F-150 Super Duty
@kurtwagner350 F-150超级重型卡车
@kurtwagner350 F-150 Super Duty
@kurtwagner350 F-150超级重型卡车
@vitor2650
my first thought: FA-45
我的第一反应是：FA-45
my first thought: FA-45
我的第一反应是：FA-45
@th3merper190
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs why not? Extreme self-loathing is typical for those that are disgusted by ego...
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 为什么不呢？极度的自我厌恶通常是那些对自我感到厌恶的人所特有的情感。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs why not? Extreme self-loathing is typical for those that are disgusted by ego...
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 为什么不呢？极度的自我厌恶通常是那些对自我感到厌恶的人所特有的情感。
@RyanVendetti-n6n
I like Doncat or f-45 Trumpcard
我喜欢Doncat或F-45王牌。
I like Doncat or f-45 Trumpcard
我喜欢Doncat或F-45王牌。
@S0RELOSER
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs show me a good leader that didn’t have a huge ego?
请给我举一个没有强烈自我意识的优秀领导者。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs show me a good leader that didn’t have a huge ego?
请给我举一个没有强烈自我意识的优秀领导者。
@RyanVendetti-n6n
Didn’t you hear he’s not paying for illegal immigrants anymore.These two aircraft’s are cheaper than paying for the immigrants.
你没听说吗，他已经不再为非法移民买单了，这两架飞机的花费比支付移民费用还要便宜。
Didn’t you hear he’s not paying for illegal immigrants anymore.These two aircraft’s are cheaper than paying for the immigrants.
你没听说吗，他已经不再为非法移民买单了，这两架飞机的花费比支付移民费用还要便宜。
@2639theboss
@S0RELOSER Virtually all of them.
@S0RELOSER 几乎全部都是这样。
@S0RELOSER Virtually all of them.
@S0RELOSER 几乎全部都是这样。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
@S0RELOSER I'm former military, I've known plenty. But that doesn't help you I know. Maybe look at people like Hal Moore or Richard Winters, They are immortalized in pop culture and should give you an idea of how leadership and character intersect. There are plenty of other leaders in history, including American political history that are not known for their ego.
Beyond that I've never known a good leader who did have a huge ego. What you're likely confused about is what constitutes greatness, leadership or even competence. Sadly Trump has not shown a grasp of any of those concepts either.
Maybe you could provide examples of some 'good leaders' who are known to have a huge ego?
我曾经是军人，认识了不少领导者，但这对你可能没什么帮助。我建议你看看像哈尔·摩尔（Hal Moore）或者理查德·温特斯（Richard Winters）这样的人，他们在流行文化中被永恒铭记，可以让你理解领导力和品格如何交织在一起。历史中还有许多领袖，包括美国政治历史上一些不以自我为中心著称的领导者。
此外，我从未认识过一个拥有巨大自负的优秀领导者。你可能混淆了伟大、领导力甚至是能力的定义。不幸的是，特朗普也未曾表现出对这些概念的理解。
也许你可以举一些拥有巨大自负却被认为是"好领导者"的例子来让我了解？
@S0RELOSER I'm former military, I've known plenty. But that doesn't help you I know. Maybe look at people like Hal Moore or Richard Winters, They are immortalized in pop culture and should give you an idea of how leadership and character intersect. There are plenty of other leaders in history, including American political history that are not known for their ego.
Beyond that I've never known a good leader who did have a huge ego. What you're likely confused about is what constitutes greatness, leadership or even competence. Sadly Trump has not shown a grasp of any of those concepts either.
Maybe you could provide examples of some 'good leaders' who are known to have a huge ego?
我曾经是军人，认识了不少领导者，但这对你可能没什么帮助。我建议你看看像哈尔·摩尔（Hal Moore）或者理查德·温特斯（Richard Winters）这样的人，他们在流行文化中被永恒铭记，可以让你理解领导力和品格如何交织在一起。历史中还有许多领袖，包括美国政治历史上一些不以自我为中心著称的领导者。
此外，我从未认识过一个拥有巨大自负的优秀领导者。你可能混淆了伟大、领导力甚至是能力的定义。不幸的是，特朗普也未曾表现出对这些概念的理解。
也许你可以举一些拥有巨大自负却被认为是"好领导者"的例子来让我了解？
@AnonymousVenator
@JojoJoget He bankrupted a few casinos out of how many tens of businesses he had? Trump's plenty deserving of criticism but this isn't one of them.
Plus F-45 would be funny
@JojoJoget 他运营的几家赌场破产了，但考虑到他拥有的数十家企业，这并不是值得批评的地方，虽然特朗普有很多地方值得被批评，但这件事算不上其中之一。另外，F-45真的很有趣。
@JojoJoget He bankrupted a few casinos out of how many tens of businesses he had? Trump's plenty deserving of criticism but this isn't one of them.
Plus F-45 would be funny
@JojoJoget 他运营的几家赌场破产了，但考虑到他拥有的数十家企业，这并不是值得批评的地方，虽然特朗普有很多地方值得被批评，但这件事算不上其中之一。另外，F-45真的很有趣。
@TheLAGopher
@bowencreer3922
Please.Trump should just award the contracts to Sukhoi and the MIG bureau to show how "Epic" a bought and sold President he is.
拜托，特朗普应该直接把合同授予苏霍伊和米格设计局，这样就能充分展示他作为一个被买通的总统有多“史诗级”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@bowencreer3922
Please.Trump should just award the contracts to Sukhoi and the MIG bureau to show how "Epic" a bought and sold President he is.
拜托，特朗普应该直接把合同授予苏霍伊和米格设计局，这样就能充分展示他作为一个被买通的总统有多“史诗级”。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@davidradtke160
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs well the problem is he says lots of contradictory things too. Some I agree with plenty I don’t…and what he actual does is a different set of things…and then there is the how, he has done plenty I could agree with, except he does it in a dumb or self destructive way. Makes me disagree with stuff I wanted because sometimes how you do something matters as much or more then the goal.
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 问题在于他总是说很多自相矛盾的话，其中有一些我赞同，但更多的是我不赞同的，此外他实际做的事情又是另外一套，与他说的往往不同，然后就是方式问题，他确实做了一些我可能赞同的事情，但常常以愚蠢或自毁的方式去做，这使我甚至开始反对那些我原本支持的目标，因为有时候做事情的方式和过程与目标本身同样重要甚至更重要。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs well the problem is he says lots of contradictory things too. Some I agree with plenty I don’t…and what he actual does is a different set of things…and then there is the how, he has done plenty I could agree with, except he does it in a dumb or self destructive way. Makes me disagree with stuff I wanted because sometimes how you do something matters as much or more then the goal.
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 问题在于他总是说很多自相矛盾的话，其中有一些我赞同，但更多的是我不赞同的，此外他实际做的事情又是另外一套，与他说的往往不同，然后就是方式问题，他确实做了一些我可能赞同的事情，但常常以愚蠢或自毁的方式去做，这使我甚至开始反对那些我原本支持的目标，因为有时候做事情的方式和过程与目标本身同样重要甚至更重要。
@Shadow__133
The "felon" name is already taken.
“犯人”这个名字已经被占用了。
The "felon" name is already taken.
“犯人”这个名字已经被占用了。
@SlyNine
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs every president ever has had that much ego.
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 每一位总统都拥有这么大的自负。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs every president ever has had that much ego.
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs 每一位总统都拥有这么大的自负。
@thomasblankinship98
@bariman223 he built them, he can call them whatever he wants.
@bariman223 他造的，他想叫什么就叫什么。
@bariman223 he built them, he can call them whatever he wants.
@bariman223 他造的，他想叫什么就叫什么。
@katherineberger6329
@S0RELOSER Michael Jordan was a great basketball player. As an executive, he's been holding the Hornets back for 20 years.
@S0RELOSER 迈克尔·乔丹曾是一位伟大的篮球运动员，但作为管理者，他过去20年来一直在拖累黄蜂队的发展。
@S0RELOSER Michael Jordan was a great basketball player. As an executive, he's been holding the Hornets back for 20 years.
@S0RELOSER 迈克尔·乔丹曾是一位伟大的篮球运动员，但作为管理者，他过去20年来一直在拖累黄蜂队的发展。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
@davidradtke160 Pretty low bar but it's a reasonable distinction.
@davidradtke160 标准确实不高，但这个区分还是有一定道理的。
@davidradtke160 Pretty low bar but it's a reasonable distinction.
@davidradtke160 标准确实不高，但这个区分还是有一定道理的。
@MoreBollocks-ui2zs
@SlyNine Can you prove that? Then try to identify any that were actually good leaders.
你能证明这一点吗？那就试着找出那些真正是优秀领导者的人吧。
@SlyNine Can you prove that? Then try to identify any that were actually good leaders.
你能证明这一点吗？那就试着找出那些真正是优秀领导者的人吧。
@Steven-p4j
The USN's long-standing tradition of using Grumman aircraft, would see all right with the world.
美国海军长期以来使用格鲁曼飞机的传统使得一切看起来都很顺理成章。
The USN's long-standing tradition of using Grumman aircraft, would see all right with the world.
美国海军长期以来使用格鲁曼飞机的传统使得一切看起来都很顺理成章。
@VonGoth
Time to bring the Hell Cat name out of retirement.... mhm.
是时候让“地狱猫”这个名字重新出山了……嗯。
Time to bring the Hell Cat name out of retirement.... mhm.
是时候让“地狱猫”这个名字重新出山了……嗯。
@sionrouge1697
PACIFIC THEATER HERE WE COME
太平洋战区，我们来了！
PACIFIC THEATER HERE WE COME
太平洋战区，我们来了！
@TheLAGopher
Getting the USAF ready to sorte out of the Marianas islands (Tinian,Saipan,Guam, Yap) Northern Australia,and the Philippines.
正在准备美国空军从马里亚纳群岛（包括天宁岛、塞班岛、关岛、雅浦岛）、澳大利亚北部和菲律宾出击。
Getting the USAF ready to sorte out of the Marianas islands (Tinian,Saipan,Guam, Yap) Northern Australia,and the Philippines.
正在准备美国空军从马里亚纳群岛（包括天宁岛、塞班岛、关岛、雅浦岛）、澳大利亚北部和菲律宾出击。
@samanthajones4877
I hope you guys enlist.
希望你们能够入伍服役。
I hope you guys enlist.
希望你们能够入伍服役。
@thomassecurename3152
Hi Alex. Love the program. Waiting for more SR-72.
嗨，Alex，喜欢这个节目，期待更多关于SR-72的内容。
Hi Alex. Love the program. Waiting for more SR-72.
嗨，Alex，喜欢这个节目，期待更多关于SR-72的内容。
@kerbodynamicx472
I think the SR-72 will be unmanned- the extreme heat of hypersonic flight is not friendly to humans.
我认为SR-72将会是无人的，因为超音速飞行的极端高温对人类并不友好。
I think the SR-72 will be unmanned- the extreme heat of hypersonic flight is not friendly to humans.
我认为SR-72将会是无人的，因为超音速飞行的极端高温对人类并不友好。
@songhan1586
technically 3 with the b-21
严格来说，加上B-21就是三个。
technically 3 with the b-21
严格来说，加上B-21就是三个。
@KOBRA_GAM1NG
@songhan1586 but that is not a fighter, it’s a bomber
@songhan1586 但那不是战斗机，是轰炸机。
@songhan1586 but that is not a fighter, it’s a bomber
@songhan1586 但那不是战斗机，是轰炸机。
@thomasblankinship98
@bicboi1930 military didn't design anything. All these different companies have been designing future advanced planes on a constant basis. When the F22was still a YF22, L/M Skunkworks was already designing a replacement for that platform. All these companies advanced design departments are already developing future platforms to replace this 6th generation platform, before it's even built and flying.
@bicboi1930 军方并没有设计任何东西，这些关于未来先进飞机的设计一直是由不同的公司在持续进行。当F22还只是YF22时，洛克希德·马丁的臭鼬工厂已经在设计替代这个平台的下一代产品，而所有这些公司的先进设计部门目前就已经在开发用来替代第六代平台的未来方案，即便这些平台其实还没有被制造出来、更没有开始飞行。
@bicboi1930 military didn't design anything. All these different companies have been designing future advanced planes on a constant basis. When the F22was still a YF22, L/M Skunkworks was already designing a replacement for that platform. All these companies advanced design departments are already developing future platforms to replace this 6th generation platform, before it's even built and flying.
@bicboi1930 军方并没有设计任何东西，这些关于未来先进飞机的设计一直是由不同的公司在持续进行。当F22还只是YF22时，洛克希德·马丁的臭鼬工厂已经在设计替代这个平台的下一代产品，而所有这些公司的先进设计部门目前就已经在开发用来替代第六代平台的未来方案，即便这些平台其实还没有被制造出来、更没有开始飞行。
@bicboi1930
@thomasblankinship98 idk the exact dates and it probably is an exaggeration, but 5th gen aircraft have a much shorter than expected lifespan. If I remember correctly the F22 wasn't even really ready to be used in a near-peer fight until the early 2010s. Thats barely 15 years before getting replaced when the F22 was going to be at the cutting edge for a long long time.
@thomasblankinship98 我不清楚具体的时间，可能有些夸张，但第五代战机的使用寿命确实比预期要短得多。如果我没记错的话，F22直到2010年代初才真正准备好参与与实力接近的对手的战斗，而距离它被更先进的战机取代的时间仅仅15年左右，原本预期是F22能够在尖端领域持久活跃。
@thomasblankinship98 idk the exact dates and it probably is an exaggeration, but 5th gen aircraft have a much shorter than expected lifespan. If I remember correctly the F22 wasn't even really ready to be used in a near-peer fight until the early 2010s. Thats barely 15 years before getting replaced when the F22 was going to be at the cutting edge for a long long time.
@thomasblankinship98 我不清楚具体的时间，可能有些夸张，但第五代战机的使用寿命确实比预期要短得多。如果我没记错的话，F22直到2010年代初才真正准备好参与与实力接近的对手的战斗，而距离它被更先进的战机取代的时间仅仅15年左右，原本预期是F22能够在尖端领域持久活跃。
@michaelpoliteski
We've had one, yes, but what about a second announcement?
我们已经有一个公告了，是的，那么第二个公告怎么样呢？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
We've had one, yes, but what about a second announcement?
我们已经有一个公告了，是的，那么第二个公告怎么样呢？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@andie_pantz
Throw in a hypersonic missile announcement for elevenses.
发布一个超音速导弹的消息来作为上午茶的放松话题吧。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Throw in a hypersonic missile announcement for elevenses.
发布一个超音速导弹的消息来作为上午茶的放松话题吧。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@CircaSriYak
Wonder how much commonality it's gonna have with the NGAD? Some people are saying the programs were secretly combined.
不知道这款飞机会和下一代空中优势战斗机（NGAD）有多少共同点，有人说这些项目可能已经秘密合并了。
Wonder how much commonality it's gonna have with the NGAD? Some people are saying the programs were secretly combined.
不知道这款飞机会和下一代空中优势战斗机（NGAD）有多少共同点，有人说这些项目可能已经秘密合并了。
@lando1296
Evil laughter commences
邪恶的笑声响起
Evil laughter commences
邪恶的笑声响起
@robertfoster347
What are the odds for F/A-45?
F/A-45的推出可能性有多高？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
What are the odds for F/A-45?
F/A-45的推出可能性有多高？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Doodelz02
F/A-48 aka "Unconstitutional"
F/A-48，也被称为“违宪”
F/A-48 aka "Unconstitutional"
F/A-48，也被称为“违宪”
@GregAcer
F/A-48
F/A-48
@bobbyraejohnson
@verdebusterAP Trump has nothing to do with the designations…. And honestly he deserves an aircraft carrier named after him from the crap he’s had to put up with.
特朗普与这些命名毫无关系，说实话，以他经历过的那些糟心事来看，他确实应该有一艘以他名字命名的航空母舰。
F/A-48
F/A-48
@bobbyraejohnson
@verdebusterAP Trump has nothing to do with the designations…. And honestly he deserves an aircraft carrier named after him from the crap he’s had to put up with.
特朗普与这些命名毫无关系，说实话，以他经历过的那些糟心事来看，他确实应该有一艘以他名字命名的航空母舰。
@Shadow__133
@dillonh321 Sadly "Felon" is already taken
@dillonh321 可惜“Felon”这个名字已经被占用了
@dillonh321 Sadly "Felon" is already taken
@dillonh321 可惜“Felon”这个名字已经被占用了
@matthewmcpherson8831
@robertfoster347 first thought
@robertfoster347 第一个想法
@robertfoster347 first thought
@robertfoster347 第一个想法
@elpenprice679
F/A-45 Felon
F/A-45 "恶棍"
F/A-45 Felon
F/A-45 "恶棍"
@alexanderandersson4093
feels really weird that lockheed wont be leading the way with 6th gens
感觉很奇怪，洛克希德居然没有在第六代战机研发上引领潮流。
feels really weird that lockheed wont be leading the way with 6th gens
感觉很奇怪，洛克希德居然没有在第六代战机研发上引领潮流。
@mfallen2023
They'll be busy making the SR-72 and the decades worth of F-35 to come. That thing's barely even started its service, lol
他们会忙着制造SR-72和未来几十年还会继续生产的F-35，那玩意的服役生涯才刚刚开始，哈哈。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
They'll be busy making the SR-72 and the decades worth of F-35 to come. That thing's barely even started its service, lol
他们会忙着制造SR-72和未来几十年还会继续生产的F-35，那玩意的服役生涯才刚刚开始，哈哈。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@iselfidentifyah64eapache
@mfallen2023 same thought. Maybe LockMart has been given the contract to build the SR-72 for full production.
@mfallen2023，我有同样的想法，也许洛克希德马丁公司已经拿到了SR-72的全面生产合同。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@mfallen2023 same thought. Maybe LockMart has been given the contract to build the SR-72 for full production.
@mfallen2023，我有同样的想法，也许洛克希德马丁公司已经拿到了SR-72的全面生产合同。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@dynestis2875
Wait, didn't canards suck?
等等，鸭式布局不是很差劲吗？
Wait, didn't canards suck?
等等，鸭式布局不是很差劲吗？
@Arrozconpanne
Seems like with the removal of the vertical stabilizers that it reduced radar cross section enough for canards to be viable
看起来取消垂直尾翼后，减少了雷达反射面积，从而让前翼设计变得可行。
Seems like with the removal of the vertical stabilizers that it reduced radar cross section enough for canards to be viable
看起来取消垂直尾翼后，减少了雷达反射面积，从而让前翼设计变得可行。
@extraordinarytv5451
Everything sucks and is a flaw for thee but not for me
Jk
一切对你来说都是糟糕和缺陷，但对我来说就不是
笑话
Everything sucks and is a flaw for thee but not for me
Jk
一切对你来说都是糟糕和缺陷，但对我来说就不是
笑话
@Jeff55369
Only if America doesn't make it. Also, don't touch our boats. :P
除非美国不参加比赛，否则别碰我们的船。 :P
Only if America doesn't make it. Also, don't touch our boats. :P
除非美国不参加比赛，否则别碰我们的船。 :P
@Appreciation-Community
Canards are great for close range fighting. Give a lot of instant AoA access.
鸭翼在近距离战斗中非常出色，能够迅速提供大量的攻角控制。
Canards are great for close range fighting. Give a lot of instant AoA access.
鸭翼在近距离战斗中非常出色，能够迅速提供大量的攻角控制。
@verdebusterAP
It depends
if they are blended with minimal space then no
but if they are like the J-20 then yes
这取决于情况，如果它们之间的间距非常小，那么不会；但如果它们的设计像歼-20那样，那么就有问题。
It depends
if they are blended with minimal space then no
but if they are like the J-20 then yes
这取决于情况，如果它们之间的间距非常小，那么不会；但如果它们的设计像歼-20那样，那么就有问题。
@dillonh321
It doesn’t have canards. What people are seeing that they think are canards is actually the top lip/edge of the intake. If you look at the other artist animation with the overhead view there is no canards and it is apparently just the intakes.
I’m talking about the image at 0:30.
它没有鸭翼，人们认为是鸭翼的结构实际上是进气口的上唇或边缘，如果你查看另一个带有俯视视角的艺术动画图像，就会发现确实没有鸭翼，很明显那只是进气口。我指的是0:30处的图像。
It doesn’t have canards. What people are seeing that they think are canards is actually the top lip/edge of the intake. If you look at the other artist animation with the overhead view there is no canards and it is apparently just the intakes.
I’m talking about the image at 0:30.
它没有鸭翼，人们认为是鸭翼的结构实际上是进气口的上唇或边缘，如果你查看另一个带有俯视视角的艺术动画图像，就会发现确实没有鸭翼，很明显那只是进气口。我指的是0:30处的图像。
@imaginos377
@dillonh321 The image at :30 is a retouched image of the original release, adjusted to show canards. Whether it has them or not......???
@dillonh321 视频中 30 秒的画面是对原始发布图像进行的修饰版本，调整后展示了鸭翼，但具体是否真的有鸭翼还不确定……
@dillonh321 The image at :30 is a retouched image of the original release, adjusted to show canards. Whether it has them or not......???
@dillonh321 视频中 30 秒的画面是对原始发布图像进行的修饰版本，调整后展示了鸭翼，但具体是否真的有鸭翼还不确定……
@mmedved5567
Who says there couldn't have been technical and material developments that made them to feasible.
谁说就不能存在某些技术和材料的发展，使得它们变得可行呢？
Who says there couldn't have been technical and material developments that made them to feasible.
谁说就不能存在某些技术和材料的发展，使得它们变得可行呢？
@samanthajones4877
@imaginos377 all of these images should tell us that they are all photoshop pictures and we don’t even have a flying prototype.
@imaginos377 所有这些图片都应该告诉我们它们都是用PS制作的，我们甚至连一个飞行原型都没有。
@imaginos377 all of these images should tell us that they are all photoshop pictures and we don’t even have a flying prototype.
@imaginos377 所有这些图片都应该告诉我们它们都是用PS制作的，我们甚至连一个飞行原型都没有。
@leifkirchoff
In high low, f35 is about to be the new low
在高低搭配中，F35似乎即将成为新的低端选择。
In high low, f35 is about to be the new low
在高低搭配中，F35似乎即将成为新的低端选择。
@nycshelbygt500
How EXCITED is Alex. He is SCREAMING!!!!!!
It is very rare that 2-5 new cutting-edge DOD military aircraft are revealed within a 2 year period. For those of you old enough to remember...The F-117A, B-2, and F-22 were revealed in the1980s. Then the JSF F-35A/B/C were revealed on the 1990s. Then nothing new in the 2000s, 2010s, and into the mid-2020s.
亚历克斯显得非常兴奋，甚至在尖叫！两年内同时公开两到五种尖端的国防部军用飞机是极其罕见的事。对于那些足够年长的人来说，你可能还记得，F-117A、B-2和F-22是在1980年代被公开的，然后是在1990年代公布了JSF F-35A/B/C，但在2000年代、2010年代以及直到2020年代中期都没有新的型号被公开。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
How EXCITED is Alex. He is SCREAMING!!!!!!
It is very rare that 2-5 new cutting-edge DOD military aircraft are revealed within a 2 year period. For those of you old enough to remember...The F-117A, B-2, and F-22 were revealed in the1980s. Then the JSF F-35A/B/C were revealed on the 1990s. Then nothing new in the 2000s, 2010s, and into the mid-2020s.
亚历克斯显得非常兴奋，甚至在尖叫！两年内同时公开两到五种尖端的国防部军用飞机是极其罕见的事。对于那些足够年长的人来说，你可能还记得，F-117A、B-2和F-22是在1980年代被公开的，然后是在1990年代公布了JSF F-35A/B/C，但在2000年代、2010年代以及直到2020年代中期都没有新的型号被公开。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@univrzsal
pretty sure itss f-22 90s, f35-2000s/late late 90s
很确定这是F-22属于90年代，而F-35是2000年代或者非常接近90年代末期的产品。
pretty sure itss f-22 90s, f35-2000s/late late 90s
很确定这是F-22属于90年代，而F-35是2000年代或者非常接近90年代末期的产品。
@nycshelbygt500
@univrzsal Contract Awards for the F22 were in 1991 and for the F35 in 2001. The development of the flying prototypes occurred in the prior decade.
@univrzsal F22的合约授予时间是1991年，而F35则是2001年，飞行原型的研发工作早在之前的十年间就已经展开。
@univrzsal Contract Awards for the F22 were in 1991 and for the F35 in 2001. The development of the flying prototypes occurred in the prior decade.
@univrzsal F22的合约授予时间是1991年，而F35则是2001年，飞行原型的研发工作早在之前的十年间就已经展开。
@donloggins863
I’m hoping for the Son of Tomcat!
我希望能看到“雄猫之子”！
I’m hoping for the Son of Tomcat!
我希望能看到“雄猫之子”！
@lyft4238
Isn't that the 22?
Should that be the son of the Raptor?
那不是22号机吗，是猛禽战斗机的后代吧？
Isn't that the 22?
Should that be the son of the Raptor?
那不是22号机吗，是猛禽战斗机的后代吧？
@JSFGuy
For what reason? Swing wing design is long behind. That's not coming back.
为什么？可变翼设计早已过时，不可能再回来了。
For what reason? Swing wing design is long behind. That's not coming back.
为什么？可变翼设计早已过时，不可能再回来了。
@sgsheff
@JSFGuy because it will be the first aircraft since the F-14 to offer the characteristics of range, payload and speed off of an aircraft carrier. The F-18 can only go supersonic when it's completely clean of any weapons or payload and barely does it then. If the Super Tomcat had been built it would still be today the best and most capable 4th Gen fighter ever made. A big reason the F/A-XX program even exists is because the Navy doesn't have the capabilities they had with the F-14 and they need those capabilities now. In a lot of ways this program is more important than the NGAD F-47
@JSFGuy 因为这将是继F-14之后首次有能在航母上具备航程、载荷和速度综合性能的飞机。F-18只有在完全不挂载任何武器或载荷的情况下才能勉强达到超音速，而即便如此也很困难。如果超级雄猫（Super Tomcat）计划得以实施，那么即使在今天，它依然会是有史以来性能最强、能力最全面的第四代战斗机之一。海军当前推进F/A-XX计划的一个重要原因在于，他们现在缺乏过去F-14所赋予的那些能力，而这些能力是眼下面对挑战迫切需要的。从很多方面来看，这一计划相比NGAD F-47计划可能更为重要。
@JSFGuy because it will be the first aircraft since the F-14 to offer the characteristics of range, payload and speed off of an aircraft carrier. The F-18 can only go supersonic when it's completely clean of any weapons or payload and barely does it then. If the Super Tomcat had been built it would still be today the best and most capable 4th Gen fighter ever made. A big reason the F/A-XX program even exists is because the Navy doesn't have the capabilities they had with the F-14 and they need those capabilities now. In a lot of ways this program is more important than the NGAD F-47
@JSFGuy 因为这将是继F-14之后首次有能在航母上具备航程、载荷和速度综合性能的飞机。F-18只有在完全不挂载任何武器或载荷的情况下才能勉强达到超音速，而即便如此也很困难。如果超级雄猫（Super Tomcat）计划得以实施，那么即使在今天，它依然会是有史以来性能最强、能力最全面的第四代战斗机之一。海军当前推进F/A-XX计划的一个重要原因在于，他们现在缺乏过去F-14所赋予的那些能力，而这些能力是眼下面对挑战迫切需要的。从很多方面来看，这一计划相比NGAD F-47计划可能更为重要。
@debbiestimac5175
@JSFGuy Correct, they are so maintainer intensive it's ruinous to field a variable geometry jet to the fleet. 80 hours for every flight hour when the F-14 was finally retired.
@JSFGuy 没错，它们的维护需求非常高，以至于让一个变后掠翼战机服役于舰队实在是损耗巨大。F-14退役时，每飞行一小时需要耗费80小时的维护工作。
@JSFGuy Correct, they are so maintainer intensive it's ruinous to field a variable geometry jet to the fleet. 80 hours for every flight hour when the F-14 was finally retired.
@JSFGuy 没错，它们的维护需求非常高，以至于让一个变后掠翼战机服役于舰队实在是损耗巨大。F-14退役时，每飞行一小时需要耗费80小时的维护工作。
@JSFGuy
@debbiestimac5175 Right, I'm a fighter maintainer, we kept tabs on maintenance intensity and maintenance friendly platforms. Never mind the mishap rate on the Tomcat.
@debbiestimac5175 没错，我是一名战斗机维修人员，我们一直关注维修强度和维修友好的平台，至于"猫式"战斗机的事故率就不必谈了。
@debbiestimac5175 Right, I'm a fighter maintainer, we kept tabs on maintenance intensity and maintenance friendly platforms. Never mind the mishap rate on the Tomcat.
@debbiestimac5175 没错，我是一名战斗机维修人员，我们一直关注维修强度和维修友好的平台，至于"猫式"战斗机的事故率就不必谈了。
@JSFGuy
@sgsheff very well. I know the mission requirements and whatnot do we evolve. I think they've got what they want in the JSF for now.
@sgsheff 非常好，我了解任务需求以及相关的内容，随着我们不断发展，我认为他们暂时已经在联合攻击战斗机（JSF）中得到了他们想要的东西。
@sgsheff very well. I know the mission requirements and whatnot do we evolve. I think they've got what they want in the JSF for now.
@sgsheff 非常好，我了解任务需求以及相关的内容，随着我们不断发展，我认为他们暂时已经在联合攻击战斗机（JSF）中得到了他们想要的东西。
@Jeff55369
I hope they do, if for no other reason to troll the crybabies. Also, it would be the f47B (they use letters to show variations.)
我希望他们真的这么做，哪怕唯一的理由只是为了愚弄那些爱哭鬼，而且这应该是型号F47B（他们用字母来表示不同的版本）。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I hope they do, if for no other reason to troll the crybabies. Also, it would be the f47B (they use letters to show variations.)
我希望他们真的这么做，哪怕唯一的理由只是为了愚弄那些爱哭鬼，而且这应该是型号F47B（他们用字母来表示不同的版本）。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@NSGunslinger
You forgot to mention Boing is also on the hook for the F15 EX
你忘了提到波音公司也承担了制造F15 EX的责任。
You forgot to mention Boing is also on the hook for the F15 EX
你忘了提到波音公司也承担了制造F15 EX的责任。
@cturdo
Boeing St. Louis actually does something right for the company. They have the unmanned tanker coming and F-47 along with F-15EX after Super Hornet/Growler line folds soon.
波音圣路易斯确实为公司做了一些正确的事情，他们即将推出无人加油机，还有F-47以及F-15EX，尽管超级大黄蜂/咆哮者生产线即将关闭。
Boeing St. Louis actually does something right for the company. They have the unmanned tanker coming and F-47 along with F-15EX after Super Hornet/Growler line folds soon.
波音圣路易斯确实为公司做了一些正确的事情，他们即将推出无人加油机，还有F-47以及F-15EX，尽管超级大黄蜂/咆哮者生产线即将关闭。
@jakeoht791
And not to mention the T7 and other offshoots like some of the 777X composites.
更不用提T7以及一些衍生型号，比如777X的复合材料了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
And not to mention the T7 and other offshoots like some of the 777X composites.
更不用提T7以及一些衍生型号，比如777X的复合材料了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@digi6336
If we could have a Boeing F-47, Lockheed Martin SR72, Northrop Grumman FA-XX and B21 Raider; that would be pretty cool
如果我们能拥有波音F-47、洛克希德·马丁SR-72、诺斯罗普·格鲁曼FA-XX和B-21袭击者，那会非常酷。
If we could have a Boeing F-47, Lockheed Martin SR72, Northrop Grumman FA-XX and B21 Raider; that would be pretty cool
如果我们能拥有波音F-47、洛克希德·马丁SR-72、诺斯罗普·格鲁曼FA-XX和B-21袭击者，那会非常酷。
@fippydpaw
Man. I cant wait to see the f47 and fa-xx flying publicly. Can't come soon enough! Excited!
哇，我真是迫不及待想看到F47和FA-XX公开飞行的场景，真希望快点到来，太让我激动了！
Man. I cant wait to see the f47 and fa-xx flying publicly. Can't come soon enough! Excited!
哇，我真是迫不及待想看到F47和FA-XX公开飞行的场景，真希望快点到来，太让我激动了！
@Golden_Rule_Truth
I’ve already seen them. They have a blue exhaust at super high altitude. They look like something out of a space movie.
我已经见过它们了，它们在超高空飞行时会喷出蓝色尾气，看起来就像是科幻电影中的场景。
I’ve already seen them. They have a blue exhaust at super high altitude. They look like something out of a space movie.
我已经见过它们了，它们在超高空飞行时会喷出蓝色尾气，看起来就像是科幻电影中的场景。
@RazvanMihaeanu
It's the same F-47 but "navalised".
I've called it some couple days ago or so.
这是同样的F-47，只是进行了“海军化”改造。
我几天前就提到了这个。
It's the same F-47 but "navalised".
I've called it some couple days ago or so.
这是同样的F-47，只是进行了“海军化”改造。
我几天前就提到了这个。
@Jeff55369
probably more like the 47 was the FAXX that had the carrier op stuff removed.
可能更像是47是FAXX版本，只是去掉了航母操作相关的东西。
probably more like the 47 was the FAXX that had the carrier op stuff removed.
可能更像是47是FAXX版本，只是去掉了航母操作相关的东西。
@RazvanMihaeanu
@Jeff55369 Exactly, it's "viceversa".
Instead of trying to "navalise" the USAF fighter (for more than 50 years all USAF fighters went also thru the scrutiny of navalisation)... this time is the other way around: already carrier capable, and a USAF " version" of it.
(JS)F-35 was doomed from the start to be a single-engine because of the USMC F-35 requirements, but this time is just a USAF/USNavy partnership.
@Jeff55369 没错，正是“反过来”的意思。
与其试图将美国空军的战斗机进行“舰载化”（因为过去五十多年来所有美国空军的战斗机都必须通过舰载化的严格审查），这次则是反过来的情况：以已经具备舰载能力为基础，再开发出一个适配于美国空军的“版本”。
从一开始，由于满足美国海军陆战队对F-35的需求，（联合攻击战斗机）F-35注定会成为单引擎战斗机，不过这次仅是美国空军与美国海军之间的合作罢了。
@Jeff55369 Exactly, it's "viceversa".
Instead of trying to "navalise" the USAF fighter (for more than 50 years all USAF fighters went also thru the scrutiny of navalisation)... this time is the other way around: already carrier capable, and a USAF " version" of it.
(JS)F-35 was doomed from the start to be a single-engine because of the USMC F-35 requirements, but this time is just a USAF/USNavy partnership.
@Jeff55369 没错，正是“反过来”的意思。
与其试图将美国空军的战斗机进行“舰载化”（因为过去五十多年来所有美国空军的战斗机都必须通过舰载化的严格审查），这次则是反过来的情况：以已经具备舰载能力为基础，再开发出一个适配于美国空军的“版本”。
从一开始，由于满足美国海军陆战队对F-35的需求，（联合攻击战斗机）F-35注定会成为单引擎战斗机，不过这次仅是美国空军与美国海军之间的合作罢了。
@Saltfly
We’ve been hearing about these planes for a long time. It’s be nice to see one
我们听说这些飞机已经很久了，能看到一架应该会很不错。
We’ve been hearing about these planes for a long time. It’s be nice to see one
我们听说这些飞机已经很久了，能看到一架应该会很不错。
@ryancomeaux1798
Can’t wait to see what NG comes up with for this 6th gen concept. The YF-23 was a masterpiece way ahead of its time!!
迫不及待想看看诺斯罗普·格鲁曼为第六代概念设计会带来什么，这款YF-23真是一件远超时代的杰作！
Can’t wait to see what NG comes up with for this 6th gen concept. The YF-23 was a masterpiece way ahead of its time!!
迫不及待想看看诺斯罗普·格鲁曼为第六代概念设计会带来什么，这款YF-23真是一件远超时代的杰作！
@thomasblankinship98
So far ahead , it lost to the F22
它遥遥领先，但还是输给了F22。
So far ahead , it lost to the F22
它遥遥领先，但还是输给了F22。
@benbowland
@thomasblankinship98 top brass were risk adverse, widely known yf-23 was the superior platform
@thomasblankinship98 高层领导过于保守众所周知YF-23才是性能更优的平台
@thomasblankinship98 top brass were risk adverse, widely known yf-23 was the superior platform
@thomasblankinship98 高层领导过于保守众所周知YF-23才是性能更优的平台
@SpaceCaptnFace
Need the wildcat 2 or tigercat ..come on gruman
要“野猫2”或者“虎猫”……加油，格鲁曼！
Need the wildcat 2 or tigercat ..come on gruman
要“野猫2”或者“虎猫”……加油，格鲁曼！
@guiltyspark659
Sabertooth
剑齿虎
Sabertooth
剑齿虎
@KOBRA_GAM1NG
Or a Shark reference, or maybe “wildcat” or “flametiger” possibly I’m bad at giving names
或者是鲨鱼的名字，也可能是“野猫”或者“火焰虎”，可能我取名字真的不在行。
Or a Shark reference, or maybe “wildcat” or “flametiger” possibly I’m bad at giving names
或者是鲨鱼的名字，也可能是“野猫”或者“火焰虎”，可能我取名字真的不在行。
@codyj7532
Cant wait for them to let the f22 off the chain
迫不及待想要看到他们解放F22的全部潜力。
Cant wait for them to let the f22 off the chain
迫不及待想要看到他们解放F22的全部潜力。
@killerdoritoWA
Navy will probably have something cooler than the F-47 Grifter.
海军可能会有比F-47 Grifter更酷的东西。
Navy will probably have something cooler than the F-47 Grifter.
海军可能会有比F-47 Grifter更酷的东西。
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149
We are so fucking back boys
我们他妈的又回来了，兄弟们！
We are so fucking back boys
我们他妈的又回来了，兄弟们！
@RocketRon7779
These were under development since early 2010's. This Program started under Obama. Shows how you have continuity no matter who is in charge and you've actually been back since then.
这些项目自2010年代初开始研发，该计划始于奥巴马执政时期，这表明无论谁执政都能保持一定的延续性，事实上从那时起一直在稳步推进。
These were under development since early 2010's. This Program started under Obama. Shows how you have continuity no matter who is in charge and you've actually been back since then.
这些项目自2010年代初开始研发，该计划始于奥巴马执政时期，这表明无论谁执政都能保持一定的延续性，事实上从那时起一直在稳步推进。
@Member00101
lol, the US won't be a country long enough for this thing to ever become active.
哈哈，美国可能还没等这东西开始运行就已经不存在了吧。
lol, the US won't be a country long enough for this thing to ever become active.
哈哈，美国可能还没等这东西开始运行就已经不存在了吧。
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149
@RocketRon7779 it was in Limbo until now. Obama might have started it but Trump brought home the W. Obama couldn't finish the job so Trump had too.
@RocketRon7779 事情之前一直悬而未决，可能是奥巴马开启了这个局面，但特朗普最终赢得了胜利，奥巴马没能完成任务，所以由特朗普接手完成。
@RocketRon7779 it was in Limbo until now. Obama might have started it but Trump brought home the W. Obama couldn't finish the job so Trump had too.
@RocketRon7779 事情之前一直悬而未决，可能是奥巴马开启了这个局面，但特朗普最终赢得了胜利，奥巴马没能完成任务，所以由特朗普接手完成。
@bowencreer3922
@RocketRon7779 except that we don’t have continuity. America died in 2020. We did not have a peaceful transition of power. Hence why the world fell apart. We have brought it back to life.
@RocketRon7779 除了我们没有延续性，美国已经在2020年死亡，我们没有经历权力的和平交接，这也是为什么世界陷入混乱的原因，不过我们已经让它重新复活了。
@RocketRon7779 except that we don’t have continuity. America died in 2020. We did not have a peaceful transition of power. Hence why the world fell apart. We have brought it back to life.
@RocketRon7779 除了我们没有延续性，美国已经在2020年死亡，我们没有经历权力的和平交接，这也是为什么世界陷入混乱的原因，不过我们已经让它重新复活了。
@xxrustyxx_6977
Nah New Zealand will be the next superpower.
新西兰将会成为下一个超级大国。
Nah New Zealand will be the next superpower.
新西兰将会成为下一个超级大国。
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149
@xxrustyxx_6977 didn't their flag ship just sink? Sure dude, whatever delusions you want to believe.
@xxrustyxx_6977 他们的主力舰刚刚沉没不是吗？行吧，随便你愿意相信什么样的妄想。
@xxrustyxx_6977 didn't their flag ship just sink? Sure dude, whatever delusions you want to believe.
@xxrustyxx_6977 他们的主力舰刚刚沉没不是吗？行吧，随便你愿意相信什么样的妄想。
@jimmyw7530
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149 talk about delusional. Trump has been back in power for a month and you’re giving him credit for something that has been in development for 15 years
He has absolutely nothing to do with it, nor does any politician.
Also, I know how dim Trump voters are, but how tf did you not know the New Zealand comment above was a joke?!
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149 太过妄想了吧，特朗普才重新掌权一个月，你就把这个已经研发了15年的东西归功于他。这跟他完全没有关系，跟任何政客也没关系。另外我知道特朗普的支持者有多愚钝，但你居然看不出来上面那个关于新西兰的评论是个玩笑吗？！
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149 talk about delusional. Trump has been back in power for a month and you’re giving him credit for something that has been in development for 15 years
He has absolutely nothing to do with it, nor does any politician.
Also, I know how dim Trump voters are, but how tf did you not know the New Zealand comment above was a joke?!
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149 太过妄想了吧，特朗普才重新掌权一个月，你就把这个已经研发了15年的东西归功于他。这跟他完全没有关系，跟任何政客也没关系。另外我知道特朗普的支持者有多愚钝，但你居然看不出来上面那个关于新西兰的评论是个玩笑吗？！
@yupyup4209
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149 I think he was just kidding around
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149 我觉得他只是开个玩笑而已。
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149 I think he was just kidding around
@illcomplywithguncontrolone6149 我觉得他只是开个玩笑而已。
@masterbaiter0fthebait572
@jimmyw7530 Why are you talking about trump when nothing has been said about him. Is he stuck in your head? You do realize that this could have been how the U.S military is finally showing its might and not a political comment.
@jimmyw7530 为什么你要提到特朗普，明明没人提到他。难道他印在你脑海里挥之不去吗？你难道没意识到这可能只是美国军队在展现实力而不是一条政治评论。
@jimmyw7530 Why are you talking about trump when nothing has been said about him. Is he stuck in your head? You do realize that this could have been how the U.S military is finally showing its might and not a political comment.
@jimmyw7530 为什么你要提到特朗普，明明没人提到他。难道他印在你脑海里挥之不去吗？你难道没意识到这可能只是美国军队在展现实力而不是一条政治评论。
@otterconnor942
I think that it's a huge supply chain benefit for the f-47 and the fa-xx to share engines, if possible. It's for the same reasons why 556x45 is the defacto NATO standard
我认为，如果F-47和FA-XX能够共享发动机将是一个巨大的供应链优势，原因与5.56×45毫米成为北约默认标准的理由类似。
I think that it's a huge supply chain benefit for the f-47 and the fa-xx to share engines, if possible. It's for the same reasons why 556x45 is the defacto NATO standard
我认为，如果F-47和FA-XX能够共享发动机将是一个巨大的供应链优势，原因与5.56×45毫米成为北约默认标准的理由类似。
@FactCheckerGuy
Of course it is. It would also be appropriate to share versions of the same radar and other sensors, as well as cockpit instrumentation to the extent possible. All this stuff saves money and allows more combat power.
But the "jack of all trades always sucks" people don't want to hear it. They only think about the fact that commonality requires compromises, not that it also creates savings and therefore increases the size of the force.
当然是这样的，同时共享同版雷达、其他传感器以及尽可能统一的驾驶舱仪表也是合理的，这些措施都可以节省成本并提升战斗力。然而那些认为“多功能装备总是表现不佳”的人并不听人话，他们只想着共通性带来的妥协，却忽略了它可以创造成本节约从而扩大部队规模的重要事实。
Of course it is. It would also be appropriate to share versions of the same radar and other sensors, as well as cockpit instrumentation to the extent possible. All this stuff saves money and allows more combat power.
But the "jack of all trades always sucks" people don't want to hear it. They only think about the fact that commonality requires compromises, not that it also creates savings and therefore increases the size of the force.
当然是这样的，同时共享同版雷达、其他传感器以及尽可能统一的驾驶舱仪表也是合理的，这些措施都可以节省成本并提升战斗力。然而那些认为“多功能装备总是表现不佳”的人并不听人话，他们只想着共通性带来的妥协，却忽略了它可以创造成本节约从而扩大部队规模的重要事实。
@andrewbantick631
It won’t be sold outside the US because nobody will buy it with this Guy in charge
因为有这个家伙负责管理，所以美国以外的地方没人会买。
It won’t be sold outside the US because nobody will buy it with this Guy in charge
因为有这个家伙负责管理，所以美国以外的地方没人会买。
@MDP-bo9lv
@andrewbantick6311 I wouldn't go so far as to say "nobody". Europe and Asia definitely won't. Israel and Saudi Arabia probably will. Depending on how far this administration tries to go with Russo-American reproachment, it wouldn't surprise me if Russia started buying US weapons. Not that I'm enthusiastic about any of this, mind you.
@andrewbantick6311 我不至于说到“没有人”这么绝对，欧洲和亚洲肯定不会这样做，以色列和沙特阿拉伯可能会，根据这届政府与俄罗斯关系缓和的程度发展，如果俄罗斯开始购买美国武器我也不会感到意外，不过说实话，我对这一切都没什么兴致。
@andrewbantick6311 I wouldn't go so far as to say "nobody". Europe and Asia definitely won't. Israel and Saudi Arabia probably will. Depending on how far this administration tries to go with Russo-American reproachment, it wouldn't surprise me if Russia started buying US weapons. Not that I'm enthusiastic about any of this, mind you.
@andrewbantick6311 我不至于说到“没有人”这么绝对，欧洲和亚洲肯定不会这样做，以色列和沙特阿拉伯可能会，根据这届政府与俄罗斯关系缓和的程度发展，如果俄罗斯开始购买美国武器我也不会感到意外，不过说实话，我对这一切都没什么兴致。
@TymaDem
We got more news about both NGAD programs this week that we had for the last 10 years
我们本周关于两个NGAD计划的消息比过去10年里得到的还要多。
We got more news about both NGAD programs this week that we had for the last 10 years
我们本周关于两个NGAD计划的消息比过去10年里得到的还要多。
@MichaelBarnes-ey7sj
But it took ten years to make it. Don't be sheep."Look what I did" is for the gullible
但这花了十年才做出来，不要像羊群一样盲从，“看看我做了什么”只是给轻信的人看的。
But it took ten years to make it. Don't be sheep."Look what I did" is for the gullible
但这花了十年才做出来，不要像羊群一样盲从，“看看我做了什么”只是给轻信的人看的。
@thesupersaiyann5424
@MichaelBarnes-ey7sj Yep exactly and it’s also probably high time considering China’s new toys. Imagine being so blinded by your political beliefs.
@MichaelBarnes-ey7sj 没错，说得很对，而且现在可能也是时候采取行动了，尤其是考虑到中国的新装备，真是难以想象居然会因为政治立场而如此盲目。
@MichaelBarnes-ey7sj Yep exactly and it’s also probably high time considering China’s new toys. Imagine being so blinded by your political beliefs.
@MichaelBarnes-ey7sj 没错，说得很对，而且现在可能也是时候采取行动了，尤其是考虑到中国的新装备，真是难以想象居然会因为政治立场而如此盲目。
@juggernaut3373
It's the Northrop Grumman F/A-45 Tomcat II.
这是诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司的F/A-45“雄猫II”战斗机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It's the Northrop Grumman F/A-45 Tomcat II.
这是诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司的F/A-45“雄猫II”战斗机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@edseltallbert3133
I love it when I have questions and later on in the video they are answered
我喜欢视频中先让我产生疑问，然后后来又解答这些问题的感觉。
I love it when I have questions and later on in the video they are answered
我喜欢视频中先让我产生疑问，然后后来又解答这些问题的感觉。
@HAPPYFUNTIMEx2
It’s definite going to be F/A-45. No doubt. Certain person requested it. He is going to have 45 and 47. Watch
这肯定会是F/A-45，毫无疑问，有某个特定的人要求了这个型号，他会拥有F/A-45和F/A-47，拭目以待吧。
It’s definite going to be F/A-45. No doubt. Certain person requested it. He is going to have 45 and 47. Watch
这肯定会是F/A-45，毫无疑问，有某个特定的人要求了这个型号，他会拥有F/A-45和F/A-47，拭目以待吧。
@ShaperOfThings
@Jeff55369 i think eye rolling is more likely.
@Jeff55369 我觉得翻白眼的可能性更大。
@Jeff55369 i think eye rolling is more likely.
@Jeff55369 我觉得翻白眼的可能性更大。
@EpistemicAnthony
@ShaperOfThings Yes, we who find all this business embarrassing will be rolling our eyes at both the MAGA crowd and the Trump Derangement Syndrome crowd. You are both silly.
是的，我们觉得这一切都令人尴尬的人会对MAGA阵营和特朗普妄想症阵营都感到无奈，你们真是够幼稚的。
@ShaperOfThings Yes, we who find all this business embarrassing will be rolling our eyes at both the MAGA crowd and the Trump Derangement Syndrome crowd. You are both silly.
是的，我们觉得这一切都令人尴尬的人会对MAGA阵营和特朗普妄想症阵营都感到无奈，你们真是够幼稚的。
@ShaperOfThings
@EpistemicAnthony I'm neither of those things, and would remind you that there's more people outside the states then in 'em.
@EpistemicAnthony 我既不是那些人中的一个，也不是那些东西，同时我想提醒你，在美国之外的人类比美国人要多。
@EpistemicAnthony I'm neither of those things, and would remind you that there's more people outside the states then in 'em.
@EpistemicAnthony 我既不是那些人中的一个，也不是那些东西，同时我想提醒你，在美国之外的人类比美国人要多。
@Jeff55369
@ they are also ridiculous. :P
But to be fair... I ran across a document earlier that showed propositions for f40 - 46 earlier today from 6 years ago. The 47 ident isn't just because of Trump.
@ 他们也很荒谬 :P
不过公平地说……我今天早些时候看到了一份来自六年前的文件，上面展示了关于F40到F46的提案，F47的标识并不仅仅是因为特朗普。
@ they are also ridiculous. :P
But to be fair... I ran across a document earlier that showed propositions for f40 - 46 earlier today from 6 years ago. The 47 ident isn't just because of Trump.
@ 他们也很荒谬 :P
不过公平地说……我今天早些时候看到了一份来自六年前的文件，上面展示了关于F40到F46的提案，F47的标识并不仅仅是因为特朗普。
@michaelpfister1283
ShadowCat has a nice ring to it.
暗影猫这个名字听起来挺不错的。
ShadowCat has a nice ring to it.
暗影猫这个名字听起来挺不错的。
@ryanhenderson4395
This has to be named the F-28 Tomcat II…perfection!
这一定得叫F-28“雄猫II”，简直完美！
This has to be named the F-28 Tomcat II…perfection!
这一定得叫F-28“雄猫II”，简直完美！
@SmoochyRoo
probably F-49 or F-50
可能是F-49或者F-50。
probably F-49 or F-50
可能是F-49或者F-50。
@ryanhenderson4395
@SmoochyRoo F-14 x 2 = F-28 Tomcat II…if it’s Grumman it has to be this!
@SmoochyRoo F-14乘以2等于F-28“雄猫II”…如果是格鲁曼公司，那就一定是这个！
@SmoochyRoo F-14 x 2 = F-28 Tomcat II…if it’s Grumman it has to be this!
@SmoochyRoo F-14乘以2等于F-28“雄猫II”…如果是格鲁曼公司，那就一定是这个！
@brandonhultgren5776
Will this be the F-45?
这会是F-45吗？
Will this be the F-45?
这会是F-45吗？
@markfischer3626
I'm just hoping that the wings don't fall off the Boeing F47 the way the door flew off the 737 MAX.
我只是希望波音F47的机翼不要像737 MAX的舱门那样飞脱了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I'm just hoping that the wings don't fall off the Boeing F47 the way the door flew off the 737 MAX.
我只是希望波音F47的机翼不要像737 MAX的舱门那样飞脱了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@NWguy83
Different divisions of a big company... Boeing's military division has a lot less problems than the commercial division.
一家大公司内部的不同部门……波音公司的军用业务部门的问题明显比商业业务部门少得多。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Different divisions of a big company... Boeing's military division has a lot less problems than the commercial division.
一家大公司内部的不同部门……波音公司的军用业务部门的问题明显比商业业务部门少得多。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@tiju.j
Its actually McDonnell Douglass
实际上是麦克唐纳·道格拉斯公司。
Its actually McDonnell Douglass
实际上是麦克唐纳·道格拉斯公司。
@zyoungson215
Boeing is McDonnell douglas in drag
波音就像是伪装的麦道公司一样。
Boeing is McDonnell douglas in drag
波音就像是伪装的麦道公司一样。
@everettputerbaugh3996
...Harder to hire temps. to build for DoD. They'll have to find a different way to screw up.
现在雇佣临时工为国防部工作变得更加困难，他们必须另寻其他方法来搞砸事情。
...Harder to hire temps. to build for DoD. They'll have to find a different way to screw up.
现在雇佣临时工为国防部工作变得更加困难，他们必须另寻其他方法来搞砸事情。
@jimmcneal5292
What's the point in F-35C then?
那F-35C的意义是什么呢？
What's the point in F-35C then?
那F-35C的意义是什么呢？
@XTh3T3RMIN4T0RX
F-35 is a multirole. The replacement for the FA-18 is different in purpose
F-35是一款多用途战机，用途与FA-18的替代机型有着不同的设计目的。
F-35 is a multirole. The replacement for the FA-18 is different in purpose
F-35是一款多用途战机，用途与FA-18的替代机型有着不同的设计目的。
@jacobbaumgardner3406
F-35C was, like the other F-35’s, a strike and SEAD platform, meant to well, pound ground targets and suppress enemy air defenses. It’s rather good at it, too.
What the F/A-XX will be used for is air superiority and fleet defense, like the F-14 before it. These missions require starkly different airfrxs, and so we have two separate jets for different missions.
F-35C与其他型号的F-35一样，是一种执行对地打击和压制敌方防空系统的作战平台，专门用于打击地面目标并削弱敌方防空力量，这方面它表现得相当出色。而F/A-XX的用途则主要集中在制空权争夺和舰队防御任务，类似于之前的F-14，这类任务需要完全不同的机体设计，因此我们为不同任务需求研制了两种截然不同的战机。
F-35C was, like the other F-35’s, a strike and SEAD platform, meant to well, pound ground targets and suppress enemy air defenses. It’s rather good at it, too.
What the F/A-XX will be used for is air superiority and fleet defense, like the F-14 before it. These missions require starkly different airfrxs, and so we have two separate jets for different missions.
F-35C与其他型号的F-35一样，是一种执行对地打击和压制敌方防空系统的作战平台，专门用于打击地面目标并削弱敌方防空力量，这方面它表现得相当出色。而F/A-XX的用途则主要集中在制空权争夺和舰队防御任务，类似于之前的F-14，这类任务需要完全不同的机体设计，因此我们为不同任务需求研制了两种截然不同的战机。
@TymaDem
@XTh3T3RMIN4T0RX What is the multirole if not fighter stacker aka F/A then?
@XTh3T3RMIN4T0RX 如果不是作为战斗机堆叠器的多用途机型，也就是F/A，那又是什么呢？
@XTh3T3RMIN4T0RX What is the multirole if not fighter stacker aka F/A then?
@XTh3T3RMIN4T0RX 如果不是作为战斗机堆叠器的多用途机型，也就是F/A，那又是什么呢？
@TymaDem
@ it’s not, they are replacing f/a-18SH which is a multirole platform
这不是这样的，他们是在替换F/A-18SH，这是一款多用途平台的战机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@ it’s not, they are replacing f/a-18SH which is a multirole platform
这不是这样的，他们是在替换F/A-18SH，这是一款多用途平台的战机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@SmoochyRoo
A lot, That's like asking what's the point in the F-15EX when you can slap missile pallets inside C-5s. Every plane has its role and is accounted for in the future of air combat.
这就像问为什么需要F-15EX，当你可以在C-5运输机里装满导弹托盘一样，每种飞机都有其特定的作用，并在未来的空战中被合理规划和利用。
A lot, That's like asking what's the point in the F-15EX when you can slap missile pallets inside C-5s. Every plane has its role and is accounted for in the future of air combat.
这就像问为什么需要F-15EX，当你可以在C-5运输机里装满导弹托盘一样，每种飞机都有其特定的作用，并在未来的空战中被合理规划和利用。
@BRAINFxck10
F35c is more for Air to Ground missions this new plane will be more Air to Air focused
F-35C更适合执行空对地任务，而这架新飞机将更加专注于空对空作战。
F35c is more for Air to Ground missions this new plane will be more Air to Air focused
F-35C更适合执行空对地任务，而这架新飞机将更加专注于空对空作战。
@verdebusterAP
The F/A XX replaces the F-18 not the F-35
Now why both
USN necked down to just F-18 however the F-18 operating as a tanker burned through F-18s air frxs faster than they expected. Combined with sustained operations
The F-18 were heavily over worked. The F-35C gives the USN another aircraft to take the load but also gives them several more options
The F-35C is stealth so the USN has aircraft that can perform various ISTAR functions by utilizing its stealth. No longer relying on the USAF for ISR or ISTAR
The F-35C can use it stealth and strike the enemy's sensors allowing the F-18 to strike unhindered against targets at sea or on land
with the FAXX, it will strike the enemy sensors while the F-35C delivers the killing blow
Two aircraft allow for the USN to share the burden instead placing it on plane
F/A XX将会取代F-18而不是F-35。为什么要同时拥有两个型号？
美国海军之前曾仅仅依赖F-18，但由于F-18被频繁用作加油机的角色，导致其机体寿命消耗比预期更快，再加上长期高强度任务，F-18的工作负担非常繁重。引入F-35C不但为美海军增加了可用机型，缓解了这一压力，同时也为他们提供了多种战术选择。
F-35C的隐身性能使美国海军拥有可以执行多种ISTAR（情报、监视、目标捕获与侦察）任务的飞机，而无需继续依赖美国空军的ISR或ISTAR支援。通过隐身能力，F-35C能够摧毁敌方传感器，为F-18提供掩护，让其可以更加有效地对海上或陆地目标进行攻击。
未来F/A XX将负责打击敌方传感器，而F-35C则完成关键性攻击。这两种飞机的搭配能够让海军将任务负担分摊，避免过度依赖某一型号飞机。
The F/A XX replaces the F-18 not the F-35
Now why both
USN necked down to just F-18 however the F-18 operating as a tanker burned through F-18s air frxs faster than they expected. Combined with sustained operations
The F-18 were heavily over worked. The F-35C gives the USN another aircraft to take the load but also gives them several more options
The F-35C is stealth so the USN has aircraft that can perform various ISTAR functions by utilizing its stealth. No longer relying on the USAF for ISR or ISTAR
The F-35C can use it stealth and strike the enemy's sensors allowing the F-18 to strike unhindered against targets at sea or on land
with the FAXX, it will strike the enemy sensors while the F-35C delivers the killing blow
Two aircraft allow for the USN to share the burden instead placing it on plane
F/A XX将会取代F-18而不是F-35。为什么要同时拥有两个型号？
美国海军之前曾仅仅依赖F-18，但由于F-18被频繁用作加油机的角色，导致其机体寿命消耗比预期更快，再加上长期高强度任务，F-18的工作负担非常繁重。引入F-35C不但为美海军增加了可用机型，缓解了这一压力，同时也为他们提供了多种战术选择。
F-35C的隐身性能使美国海军拥有可以执行多种ISTAR（情报、监视、目标捕获与侦察）任务的飞机，而无需继续依赖美国空军的ISR或ISTAR支援。通过隐身能力，F-35C能够摧毁敌方传感器，为F-18提供掩护，让其可以更加有效地对海上或陆地目标进行攻击。
未来F/A XX将负责打击敌方传感器，而F-35C则完成关键性攻击。这两种飞机的搭配能够让海军将任务负担分摊，避免过度依赖某一型号飞机。
@KOBRA_GAM1NG
The FA/XX is ment to complement the F-35C, they work together
FA/XX的设计是为了与F-35C互为补充，两者协同作战。
The FA/XX is ment to complement the F-35C, they work together
FA/XX的设计是为了与F-35C互为补充，两者协同作战。
@Trojan0304
At NG facility in LA has F-14 murals in cafeteria
洛杉矶的NG基地餐厅里有F-14战斗机的壁画，气氛超棒！
At NG facility in LA has F-14 murals in cafeteria
洛杉矶的NG基地餐厅里有F-14战斗机的壁画，气氛超棒！
@ComputerGeeks-R-Us
I'll be happy to see them get back to built-for-purpose airfrxs instead of trying to make so many compromises that a single airfrx isn't superior at anything.
我很高兴看到他们回归专为特定用途设计的机身，而不是试图做出那么多妥协，导致单一机身在任何方面都无法出类拔萃。
I'll be happy to see them get back to built-for-purpose airfrxs instead of trying to make so many compromises that a single airfrx isn't superior at anything.
我很高兴看到他们回归专为特定用途设计的机身，而不是试图做出那么多妥协，导致单一机身在任何方面都无法出类拔萃。
@johnsoncityaerialphotograp7201
I kind of thought we might get a 2nd place runner up from Lockheed or another top supplier as a carrier or alternative use case also added..
我觉得我们可能会从洛克希德或其他顶级供应商那里获得一个第二名的候选者，并作为载体或替代使用案例的补充。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I kind of thought we might get a 2nd place runner up from Lockheed or another top supplier as a carrier or alternative use case also added..
我觉得我们可能会从洛克希德或其他顶级供应商那里获得一个第二名的候选者，并作为载体或替代使用案例的补充。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@debbiestimac5175
F-15 and F-14, that classic friendly rivalry is happening again but now with F-47 and F/A-XX. Nice.
F-15和F-14之间那种经典的友好竞争又出现了，不过这次主角变成了F-47和F/A-XX，挺不错的。
F-15 and F-14, that classic friendly rivalry is happening again but now with F-47 and F/A-XX. Nice.
F-15和F-14之间那种经典的友好竞争又出现了，不过这次主角变成了F-47和F/A-XX，挺不错的。
@brenthegarty3922
It'll be a variant of the F-47.
Looks like the F47 was based on Boeing's FAXX submission already.
Easier to "de-carrier" a carrier aircraft for the USAF than the itger way around.
Maybe the Navy version has canards and the USAF version doesn't as those are more help with STOL than anything else, as i understand.
The requirements between the two services for these programs are very similar. Its not like the F35 trying to fit STOVL for the Marines imto it.
这将是F-47的一个变种版本。
看起来F-47已经是基于波音公司提交的FAXX方案设计的。
对于美国空军来说，从舰载机转变为非舰载机比反过来要容易。
也许海军的版本有鸭翼，而空军的版本则没有，因为据我理解，这些设计在短距起飞和降落方面的帮助比其他功能要大。
两军对于这些项目的需求非常相似，不像F-35那样试图将短距起飞垂直降落功能融入海军陆战队使用。
It'll be a variant of the F-47.
Looks like the F47 was based on Boeing's FAXX submission already.
Easier to "de-carrier" a carrier aircraft for the USAF than the itger way around.
Maybe the Navy version has canards and the USAF version doesn't as those are more help with STOL than anything else, as i understand.
The requirements between the two services for these programs are very similar. Its not like the F35 trying to fit STOVL for the Marines imto it.
这将是F-47的一个变种版本。
看起来F-47已经是基于波音公司提交的FAXX方案设计的。
对于美国空军来说，从舰载机转变为非舰载机比反过来要容易。
也许海军的版本有鸭翼，而空军的版本则没有，因为据我理解，这些设计在短距起飞和降落方面的帮助比其他功能要大。
两军对于这些项目的需求非常相似，不像F-35那样试图将短距起飞垂直降落功能融入海军陆战队使用。
@Jeff55369
Considering that 6th gen might rely heavily on modular design. It wouldn't be crazy if 80% of the NGAD aircraft were similar. Outer shell might be slightly different, but since most everything could be the same, it's not crazy to think Boeing could get the FAXX contract too. Or even if Northup gets the contract, the parts might be standardized across platforms in order to keep costs down.
考虑到第六代战机可能会高度依赖模块化设计，80%的NGAD飞机设计类似也并不算疯狂。外壳可能稍有不同，但考虑到大多数组件可以通用，波音获得FAXX合同也并非不可能。甚至即使合同由诺斯罗普公司拿下，为了控制成本，各平台之间的零件可能都会标准化。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Considering that 6th gen might rely heavily on modular design. It wouldn't be crazy if 80% of the NGAD aircraft were similar. Outer shell might be slightly different, but since most everything could be the same, it's not crazy to think Boeing could get the FAXX contract too. Or even if Northup gets the contract, the parts might be standardized across platforms in order to keep costs down.
考虑到第六代战机可能会高度依赖模块化设计，80%的NGAD飞机设计类似也并不算疯狂。外壳可能稍有不同，但考虑到大多数组件可以通用，波音获得FAXX合同也并非不可能。甚至即使合同由诺斯罗普公司拿下，为了控制成本，各平台之间的零件可能都会标准化。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@helix1061
what about the F-45 Condor?
F-45秃鹫战机怎么样？
what about the F-45 Condor?
F-45秃鹫战机怎么样？
@debbiestimac5175
F-45 Hellcat II
F-45 地狱猫 II
F-45 Hellcat II
F-45 地狱猫 II
@KOBRA_GAM1NG
I would say that is more of a helicopter name
我觉得这更像是一个直升机的名字。
I would say that is more of a helicopter name
我觉得这更像是一个直升机的名字。
@elpenprice679
F/A-45 Felon
F/A-45“重犯”
F/A-45 Felon
F/A-45“重犯”
@NuclearFalcon146
@elpenprice679 The Su-57 already took the name.
@elpenprice679 苏-57已经抢先用了这个名字。
@elpenprice679 The Su-57 already took the name.
@elpenprice679 苏-57已经抢先用了这个名字。
@griffinarcher2911
Getting geared up for Taiwan
为即将前往台湾（地区）做好准备。
Getting geared up for Taiwan
为即将前往台湾（地区）做好准备。
@hoghogwild
Let's remember that US Navy just ordered 17 more SuperHornets prior to the 2027 shutdown of the production line. The tanker role and ops tempo has been hard on lifecycle. Current ops tempo is very high.
让我们记住，美国海军刚刚在2027年停产前追加订购了17架超级大黄蜂，用于执行加油任务的压力以及高强度的作业节奏对飞机的使用寿命造成了较大的影响，目前的作业节奏非常紧张。
Let's remember that US Navy just ordered 17 more SuperHornets prior to the 2027 shutdown of the production line. The tanker role and ops tempo has been hard on lifecycle. Current ops tempo is very high.
让我们记住，美国海军刚刚在2027年停产前追加订购了17架超级大黄蜂，用于执行加油任务的压力以及高强度的作业节奏对飞机的使用寿命造成了较大的影响，目前的作业节奏非常紧张。
@starshipcaptain4753
When is the delivery window for both Gen 6 fighters to enter service like 10 years or 15?
第六代战斗机的服役时间窗是多久，大概是10年还是15年？
When is the delivery window for both Gen 6 fighters to enter service like 10 years or 15?
第六代战斗机的服役时间窗是多久，大概是10年还是15年？
@bryanbarnes6689
When you fire half the country I guess there is money for new toys.
当你解雇了半个国家的人，看来就有钱买新玩具了。
When you fire half the country I guess there is money for new toys.
当你解雇了半个国家的人，看来就有钱买新玩具了。
@mojothemigo
Half parasite federal employees who do half a days work and nope, there are cuts to the pentagon too.
一半是寄生虫的联邦雇员，只工作半天，而且五角大楼也会遭到削减。
Half parasite federal employees who do half a days work and nope, there are cuts to the pentagon too.
一半是寄生虫的联邦雇员，只工作半天，而且五角大楼也会遭到削减。
@Marshmellar
Last 4 years sucked. 2025 is only 3 months in and already kicking off with a blast!
过去四年简直糟透了，2025年才刚开始三个月就已经火力全开了！
Last 4 years sucked. 2025 is only 3 months in and already kicking off with a blast!
过去四年简直糟透了，2025年才刚开始三个月就已经火力全开了！
@Vincewett
Yes!
是的！
Yes!
是的！
@2639theboss
Yeah im loving watching our GDP shrink, our markets suffer the worst losses since 2008, our government continuing to outspend itself and crucial research for national security getting cut.
4 more years of this cant possibly get any better.
是啊，我真是太喜欢看到我们的GDP萎缩、市场遭遇自2008年以来最惨重的损失、政府继续超支以及事关国家安全的关键研究被削减了，再来四年这样的情况也不会变得更好吧。
Yeah im loving watching our GDP shrink, our markets suffer the worst losses since 2008, our government continuing to outspend itself and crucial research for national security getting cut.
4 more years of this cant possibly get any better.
是啊，我真是太喜欢看到我们的GDP萎缩、市场遭遇自2008年以来最惨重的损失、政府继续超支以及事关国家安全的关键研究被削减了，再来四年这样的情况也不会变得更好吧。
@TheLAGopher
@2639theboss
Not to mention our national security leadership showing they are naive and way over their heads regarding negotiations with allied and adversary powers, personnal management, and operational security.
更不用说我们的国家安全领导层在与盟友和对手进行谈判、人员管理以及运营安全方面，表现得天真又完全不胜任。
@2639theboss
Not to mention our national security leadership showing they are naive and way over their heads regarding negotiations with allied and adversary powers, personnal management, and operational security.
更不用说我们的国家安全领导层在与盟友和对手进行谈判、人员管理以及运营安全方面，表现得天真又完全不胜任。
@lyft4238
F45 and the F47
F45 和 F47
F45 and the F47
F45 和 F47
@kyejt-r
Trump Planes?
特朗普的飞机？
Trump Planes?
特朗普的飞机？
@Steven-p4j
I had genuine imagined that for the sake of cost and commonality of parts, that the USN would have had a navalised version of a USAF NGAD?
我原本真心以为，为了降低成本以及部件通用性，美国海军应该会拥有空军NGAD的海军化版本吧？
I had genuine imagined that for the sake of cost and commonality of parts, that the USN would have had a navalised version of a USAF NGAD?
我原本真心以为，为了降低成本以及部件通用性，美国海军应该会拥有空军NGAD的海军化版本吧？
很赞 7
收藏