中国无人运输机完成首次试飞,看中国的无人机大型化发展成果
2024-08-14 ◣靜♂候輪回 10395
正文翻译
CGTN报道中国国产大型无人运输机在四川首飞成功




评论翻译
@vetrino4ever
This is a breakthrough, Congratulations to all Chinese people who work on it, China will lead the future.

这是一个突破,祝贺所有为此努力的中国人,中国将引领未来。

@adebuluabdulgafar8879
Beautiful China

美丽的中国

@davidlazarus67
This could make a very good commercial delivery platform. Particularly to islands or remote areas.

这可以成为一个非常好的商业交付平台,特别适用于岛屿或偏远地区。

@andreiandrei2708
Congratulations!

祝贺!

@YCHTT
US is not going to like this.

美国不会喜欢这个。

@babalsran06
Tommorow they say this is dangerous innovation by China to threat usa

明天他们会说这是中国的危险创新,威胁美国。

@chongdi6140
Who cares whether or not they like it period.

谁在乎他们是否喜欢。
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@drymoper2234
Waiting for another sanction

等待另一个制裁。

@ad.6472
Who cares what they think?

谁在乎他们怎么想?

@AITalkingHead
Awesome piece of tech. Congrats!

了不起的技术。祝贺!

@user-fk8oz9ch9x
PLA need this at China and India borders and south China sea to support and rescue mission

解放军需要在中印边境和南海使用这项技术来支持和执行救援任务。

@jimmyz5321
South American manufacturers of recreational chemicals will have a great need for such unmanned transport aircraft.

南美的休闲化学品制造商将对这种无人运输飞机有很大的需求。

@gabrieldiazreyes875
firefighting version is gonna be awesome

消防版将会非常棒。

@jacobrocks7
Trust this more than Boeing

比波音更值得信赖。

@SoCalFreelance
0:32 Here I believe you see a glimpse of the Tengden TB0D Scorpion D Cargo UAV which has a cargo capacity of 1.5 tons.

0:32 我相信你在这里看到了腾盾TB0D Scorpion D货运无人机的一瞥,它的载货能力为1.5吨。

@markscott554
I wonder how long before an upscaled 4-engine version. That would be awesome.

我想知道多长时间后会有一个升级的四引擎版本。那将会很棒。

@josephguo6256
just wait and see.

拭目以待。

@user-tf4mz3mf7e
The version with three engines, due to its stable performance and large cargo capacity, has already been requisitioned by the military. All the technology and patents have been forcibly purchased by the military.

有三个引擎的版本,因其稳定的性能和载货量大 ,已经被军方征用了,所有的技术和专利已经被军方强买了

@gohsimon4347
Well done China congratulation

干得好,中国,祝贺你们。

@htau2000
Should go for VTOL too!

也应该考虑垂直起降(VTOL)功能!

@cutbaitgofishing
Kicking ass, taking names - way to go China.

干得漂亮,中国,加油。

@davepsk7334
Should we be looking at cheaper costs then??
By the way, cheaper means it's not good in western terms.
Sanction them? US? Ya? Just find an excuse. Ok?
Deflation is bad, inflation is good, yes?

那我们是不是应该考虑降低成本?顺便说一句,在西方的术语中,便宜意味着不好。制裁他们?美国?对吗?只是找个借口,对吧?通缩不好,通胀好,是吗?

@philiptan2051
Just as expected, the future commercial aviation will be pilotless. This self flying large aircraft with two engines has undergone a 20 minutes flying test successfully. Next test should be a more daring test in turbulent weather. I believe in pilotless commercial and military aircraft as I myself have a pilot license but recognize the possibility of AI equipped robot flying an aircraft.

正如预期的那样,未来的商业航空将是无人的。这架配备两个引擎的自动飞行大型飞机已经成功进行了20分钟的飞行测试。下一个测试应该是在恶劣天气中的更大胆的测试。我相信无人的商业和军用飞机,因为我自己有飞行员执照,但我也认识到配备AI的机器人飞行飞机的可能性。
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@yzhang9265
NIIIIICE :)

很棒的 :)

@jorgipogi
Game changer for transportation companies. Amazon on the look out.

对运输公司来说是游戏规则的改变者。亚马逊也在关注。

@Hamzashahab096
Congratulations to our Chinese brothers. More power to you ️

祝贺我们的中国兄弟。祝你们更加强大

@christophmahler
They are not produced for domestic markets - or any foreign commercial sector.

这些不是为国内市场或任何外国商业领域生产的。

@ogunremilekan7793
This should not be a surprise. I have been expecting something like this since the invention of drone. It's just like a mega-drone. More flying obxts with different shapes and sizes will soon be floating on the sky.

这不应该令人惊讶。自从无人机发明以来,我就一直在期待类似的东西。这就像一架巨型无人机。不久之后,不同形状和大小的飞行物将漂浮在天空中。

@Mar-ec7et
it does look like a Awacs plane

它确实看起来像一架预警机。

@BruceJ999
The Cartels are smiling in the corner.

Cartels在角落里笑了。

@kckfen
Are those solar panel on the body of the aircraft?

飞机机身上是太阳能电池板吗?

@Cupidstuntfc
An unmanned aircraft built in china. What could go wrong!!!!

中国制造的无人机。能出什么问题呢!!!!
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@downwithreactionaries9031
replace cessna caravan

替代塞斯纳大篷车。

@segbwemabee5757
This is a threat to national security, says Uncle Sam.

山姆大叔说,这对国家安全构成威胁。

@josephguo6256
technology? China or West?

技术?中国还是西方?

@aungaisum8654
West don't have

西方没有。
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@AAAAAA-tj1nq
Usa doesn't have unmanned cargo plane

美国没有无人货机。

@MarvinChenFantasy
Trump will like it, because this drone is, huge.

特朗普会喜欢的,因为这个无人机很大。

@kittyflier8338
See these black smoke behind?

看到后面的黑烟了吗?

@wwbren
Chinese are tech advanced but why is their design still stuck in the 80s. You don't need a cockpit like dome when you have no pilot.

中国的技术很先进,但为什么他们的设计仍然停留在80年代?当你没有飞行员时,你不需要类似驾驶舱的圆顶。

@user-bu4vq5nw3p
This might be an autonomous system retrofitted onto an old aircraft. In China, many old J-6 fighter jets have been converted into unmanned aircraft.

这可能是某款老飞机改造的自动驾驶系统。在中国非常多的老式的J-6战斗机改造成无人驾驶飞机。

@samgooi1905
"Critic will forever be critic that's all they're good for "

“批评者永远只是批评者,那是他们唯一擅长的事。”

@some559
The external white dome/bump is probably to save some internal storage space, like how A330F has bump at their front landing gear. It's a transport aircraft after all.

外部的白色圆顶/凸起可能是为了节省内部储物空间,就像A330F在前起落架处有凸起一样。毕竟这是一架运输机。
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@XkMeng
It's called a radome, and it's packed with sensors, communication antennas, GPS, and other devices. Moreover, the upward protrusion also has a rectification effect, which can increases lift at the front

它叫做雷达罩,里面装满了传感器、通信天线、GPS和其他设备。此外,向上的凸起还有整流作用,可以增加前部的升力。

@yacir
Why not make a travel focused version of it, some seats, and windows would do! Pretty sure some remote areas like jungles, deserts, archipelagos, would be interested, in both versions, and further down the road may be a version that land on water ? 1question can it be autonomous? like turkish drones, they take the air and land using Ai.

为什么不制作一个专注于旅行的版本,加些座椅和窗户就可以了!我很确定一些偏远地区,如丛林、沙漠、群岛,对这两种版本都会感兴趣,未来还可能有一个可以在水上降落的版本?有一个问题,它可以自主飞行吗?像土耳其的无人机那样,使用AI起飞和降落。

@credera
you mean with pilots?

你的意思是有飞行员?

@user-dc1ud6px3s
But why? Why use an unmanned aircraft for travel? For military use unmanned aircraft can carry out dangerous mission. That's the only advantage.

但是为什么?为什么用无人机旅行?对于军事用途,无人机可以执行危险任务。这是唯一的优势。

@Sayitlikeitis-jn6xe
Would you ride an unmanned aircraft to go to remote areas where there’s probably no one close by who can safe you or recover your body should the aircraft go down ?

你会乘坐无人飞机前往偏远地区吗?那里可能没有人可以在飞机坠毁时拯救你或找回你的身体。

@yacir
@Sayitlikeitis-jn6xe the remote area in question would have @ least a runway, yes? So there should be some kind of safety net, it's a risk that is always there. Nepal for example deal with this kind of risks anyway. The (should be) low price, due to lack of personnel, pilots, stewards, should be incentive enough.

所讨论的偏远地区至少会有一条跑道,对吗?所以应该有某种安全保障,这种风险总是存在的。例如,尼泊尔已经在应对这类风险了。由于没有人员、飞行员、乘务员,(应该)低廉的价格就足够成为激励因素。

@yacir
@user-dc1ud6px3s that's exactly the idea of those Fly taxis that looks like a quadcopter cabin, no? There is a potential, and a lower price for a seat due to lack of pilots, personnel should be a good incentive.

这正是那些看起来像四旋翼机舱的飞行出租车的想法,对吗?由于没有飞行员,低廉的座位价格应该是一个很好的激励因素。
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@Sayitlikeitis-jn6xe
@yacir The question is “would you ride an unmanned aircraft to remote areas?” There’s no telling where an aircraft will go down. So it makes no difference if there’s a runway or not. The point is: the unmanned aircrafts that China has right now are carrying supplies. It those unmanned aircraft’s crashes, the loss would be the supplies and the aircraft itself. Why risk it with human beings? Is there a shortage of pilots? Why increase risks when it’s not necessary ? Many people have not even build up the courage to ride an unmanned taxi, let alone an unmanned aircraft traveling to remote areas.

问题是“你会乘坐无人飞机去偏远地区吗?” 无法预测飞机会在哪里坠毁。所以是否有跑道并没有区别。关键是:中国目前拥有的无人机正在运送物资。如果那些无人机坠毁,损失将是物资和飞机本身。为什么要冒险用它载人呢?飞行员短缺吗?为什么要在不必要的情况下增加风险?许多人甚至还没有勇气乘坐无人出租车,更不用说乘坐无人飞机前往偏远地区了。

@josenwushangkehan
Qilai , Qilai , Qilaiii.....

起来,起来,起来.....

@weirdshibainu
The military applications are obvious

军事应用显而易见。

@88thSeigeArmy
So are stocks and stones
What is your point

股票和石头也是差不多的。你的观点是什么?
译者注:单词接近

@weirdshibainu
@88thSeigeArmy I own stocks. Do you own stones?

我拥有股票。你拥有石头吗?
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@88thSeigeArmy
@weirdshibainu lol.
Some. some of my stones are probably worth more than you think very very rare stones not to mention easy to move and not traceable.

笑。我的一些石头可能比你想象的还要值钱,非常稀有的石头,而且容易移动且无法追踪。

@weirdshibainu
@88thSeigeArmy So are my stocks

我的股票也是。

@88thSeigeArmy
@weirdshibainu it is the military applications for the dust I have in my possession that you need to worry about
Uranium oxide does have a reputation that proceeds it
I don't suppose you're Japanese ate ops I mean 'are' you

你需要担心的是我拥有的尘埃的军事应用。氧化铀确实有一个声名。我想你不是日本人吧?噢,我的意思是“是”你吗?

@weirdshibainu
@88thSeigeArmy You're just babbling

你只是在胡说八道。

@88thSeigeArmy
@weirdshibainu no not really
Just an observation thinking out loud.

不,不是的。只是一个大声的思考观察。
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@88thSeigeArmy
@weirdshibainu besides the point I suppose to the plane either way
Are you a Virgo? They are famous for nit picking
So are chimpanzees

不管怎样,这与飞机无关。我猜你是处女座?他们以吹毛求疵而闻名。黑猩猩也是。

@Raytracer96024
@88thSeigeArmy okay NeoNahtzee

好的,新纳粹。

@88thSeigeArmy
@Raytracer96024 yes we are a warlike people that is for sure

是的,我们是好战的民族,这是肯定的。

@88thSeigeArmy
@Raytracer96024 enjoy the hurricanes
I see two be mergeing

享受飓风吧。我看到两个飓风正在合并。

@Raytracer96024
@88thSeigeArmy lol self report

哈哈,自我报告。

@Raytracer96024
@88thSeigeArmy enjoy the economic collapse

享受经济崩溃吧。

@88thSeigeArmy
I'm fine I'm Australian
It doesn't effect me
And besides yankee
You have far far more coming at you yet this season and the next as it amps up

我很好,我是澳大利亚人。这不影响我。而且,美国佬,这个季节和下个季节你们会面临更多的问题。

@88thSeigeArmy
besides your people and society are Not our concern
You are not the Eastern hemisphere like Australia and China are in
It doesn't bother me at all
It actually is entertainment for me

此外,你们的人民和社会与我们无关。
你们不像澳大利亚和中国那样在东半球。
这完全不困扰我。
实际上这对我来说是娱乐。

@BanduluSisulu-ds3oy
Over production

生产过剩

@krist6074
Horrible idea!

糟糕的主意!

@othmanhassanmajid8192
Why

为什么

@BruceJ999
He is a jealous American

他是个嫉妒的美国人。

@Wraith_Of_The_Shadows
honestly 20 mins gor first fligjt not bad, also for some reason third of thr coments are jokes, thr other third is congratulations and from the last third im loosing braincells, let me give you this: pilotless travel allows for infinitely safer, cheaper, and more efficient travel if done correctly, here are reasons why, allows more aerodynamic shape, smaller and lighter aircraft preferring aerodynamics and passangers and cargo due to the area of the plane not havig to be shared with pilots, also way more lighter,

老实说,第一次飞行20分钟还不错,而且由于某些原因,三分之一的评论是笑话,三分之一是祝贺,而最后三分之一让我感觉在失去脑细胞。让我告诉你:如果操作得当,无人驾驶旅行将使旅行变得无限安全、更便宜、更高效,原因如下:更符合空气动力学的形状,更小更轻的飞机,由于不必与飞行员共享空间,更偏向于空气动力学和乘客及货物,这样也轻了很多。
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


propaganda ? no, there is no reason why this should be propaganda, ai generated ? doubt it aswell, horrible idea? no! it's a great idea! everything will be safer and cheaper! will usa not like it? most likely, will it make china more powerful? yes, will it helo decrease prices globally and bring new technologies to the word? most likely, am i gonna listen to the voices if i read another dumb comment ? hahah absolutely,

宣传?不,没理由这是宣传。AI生成的?我也怀疑。糟糕的主意?不!这是个好主意!一切都会更安全、更便宜!美国不喜欢它?很可能。它会让中国更强大吗?是的。它会帮助全球降低价格并带来新技术吗?很可能。如果我再读到一个愚蠢的评论,我还会听那些声音吗?哈哈,当然会。

sure it helps to have your aircraft as streamlined as possible but for maintenance and low cost the way they've done it is quite good. ok i read into it the story behind the channel is little funky but thiy seems to be relatively real and still, if they're gonna export it in mass then it will help everyone, people are very biased, aparently someone wouls buy a phone from koeran company even if he had to spend 300 euro more for the same quality then get a Chinese one (pretty sure if they remove the paint bwck cover of the phone something called *made in China *text will appear*)

确实,尽可能让飞机流线型有助于维护和降低成本,他们的做法相当不错。我查了一下,频道背后的故事有点怪异,但它似乎相对真实,而且,如果他们要大量出口,这将有助于所有人。人们非常有偏见,显然有人宁愿花300欧元买同样质量的韩国公司手机,也不愿买中国的(我敢肯定,如果他们去掉手机的背壳,会出现一个中国制造的字样)。

@mypapaya590
Propaganda?

宣传?

@gunnarerdmann7104
Can not afford a pilot?

负担不起飞行员吗?

@user-bu4vq5nw3p
It can perform high-risk missions, such as delivering supplies to war zones, without worrying about the loss of pilots.

可以做一些高风险的任务。比如向战争地区运送物资。不担心飞行员损失。

@abnerkim749
You don't have to sacrifice your life anymore.

是可以不再牺牲你的命。

@Carlos22222
IA generated,

AI生成的,

@philiptan2051
Just as expected, the future commercial aviation will be pilotless. This self flying large aircraft with two engines has undergone a 20 minutes flying test successfully. Next test should be a more daring test in turbulent weather. I believe in pilotless commercial and military aircraft as I myself have a pilot license but recognize the possibility of AI equipped robot flying an aircraft.

不出所料,未来的商业航空将是无人驾驶的。这架自飞的大型双引擎飞机已经成功进行了20分钟的飞行测试。下一个测试应该是在动荡的天气中进行更大胆的测试。我相信无人驾驶的商业和军用飞机,因为我自己有飞行员执照,但也承认AI装备的机器人有可能驾驶飞机。
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@eldiablomatadore8580
It can carry cargo but how far before it looses signal and crashes down the ground

它可以运输货物,但在失去信号并坠毁之前能飞多远?

@herobrinecyberdemon8104
Something called satellites?

有种东西叫卫星?
原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


@HisAssholiness
why not show the actual takeoff and landing?

为什么不展示实际的起飞和降落?

原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处


很赞 19
收藏