现实意林东方：因为安全风险，中国立法禁止了隐藏门把手！
正文翻译
China will ban hidden car door handles from January 1, 2027, citing safety concerns, phasing out the minimalist designs popularised by Tesla. The new rules require doors to have both interior and exterior mechanical releases and could influence global EV design as China asserts itself as a standards-setter. FRANCE 24''s Jan Camenzind Broomby has more details from Beijing.
中国将从2027年1月1日起禁止使用隐藏式汽车门把手，理由是安全风险。
这一新规将逐步淘汰由特斯拉带火的极简主义设计，并要求所有车门必须配备内外均可操作的机械式开启装置。
作为全球最大的电动汽车市场，中国的这项举措可能重塑全球电动车的设计标准，彰显其在行业规则制定中日益增强的话语权。
法国24小时新闻驻北京记者Jan Camenzind Broomby带来详细报道。
China will ban hidden car door handles from January 1, 2027, citing safety concerns, phasing out the minimalist designs popularised by Tesla. The new rules require doors to have both interior and exterior mechanical releases and could influence global EV design as China asserts itself as a standards-setter. FRANCE 24''s Jan Camenzind Broomby has more details from Beijing.
中国将从2027年1月1日起禁止使用隐藏式汽车门把手，理由是安全风险。
这一新规将逐步淘汰由特斯拉带火的极简主义设计，并要求所有车门必须配备内外均可操作的机械式开启装置。
作为全球最大的电动汽车市场，中国的这项举措可能重塑全球电动车的设计标准，彰显其在行业规则制定中日益增强的话语权。
法国24小时新闻驻北京记者Jan Camenzind Broomby带来详细报道。
评论翻译
@liang8255
Good move, logic should prevail
好决定！逻辑终于战胜了噱头。
@fjuvo
Should be banned everywhere
这种设计全世界都该禁！
@mydrmezan
Now, bring back buttons for basic car functions
现在，把基本汽车功能的实体按键带回来吧。
@sleepystudent81
Doors should also automatically unlock when the airbags deploy
车门在安全气囊弹出时也应自动解锁。
@thuglaza4728
Just bring back cars with physical handles, physical buttons and knobs, and no data harvesting built-in computer.
干脆把带物理门把手、实体按键和旋钮、没有数据收集功能的内置电脑的汽车带回来吧。
@markmd9
I hope Europe does this too.
Design should not be above security!
希望欧洲也能这么做。设计绝不应凌驾于安全之上！
@vannustube
next ban blinding lights please!
接下来请禁止刺眼的车灯！
@mikebaginy8731
I've worked in the automobile industry as a design engineer over 30 years. It had always baffled me how such concealed doors handles could have ever been approved and legal.
Next to go should be those damned instrument panels - switches and knobs are far simpler, thus safer, to adjust while driving. Fiddling with a cell phone is prohibited but reading instructions on that screen while driving isn't? Madness.
我在汽车行业做了30多年的设计师，一直想不通这种隐藏式门把手当初是怎么通过审批并合法化的。
下一步该淘汰那些该死的仪表盘了——开车时用开关和旋钮调节要简单得多，也更安全。一边开车一边摆弄手机是被禁止的，但盯着屏幕看操作说明却不是？简直疯狂。
@youdontsay2529
I can't believe nobody saw this coming. Reliability used to be a selling point.
真不敢相信没人早料到这一点。可靠性曾经可是卖点啊。
@user-hr4ey5jr4x
This is good safety decision
这是个很好的安全决策。
@FrenchStarterFle
Interesting safety decision. In France most cars still use classic handles, sometimes old tech is safer than smart tech.
有趣的安全决策。在法国，大多数汽车仍使用传统门把手，有时候老技术比智能技术更安全。
@bluemoon8498
That design is from tesla that car markers started to copy which i found stupid. We need solid door handles and bring back ignition keys too.
这种设计源自特斯拉，后来车企纷纷效仿，我觉得很愚蠢。我们需要结实的门把手，也该把机械钥匙带回来。
@andrew_sharp
I'd also ban putting essential car controls onto LCD screens! Just imagine, it's -20C degrees. I'm in a brand new MG crossover and I need to take off my warm gloves to mash through all this on-screen interface to switch the heater on! Bring me back my old Passat where the matter was just to turn damn simple handle!
我也主张禁止把关键车辆控制功能放在液晶屏幕上！想象一下，零下20摄氏度，我坐在一辆全新的MG跨界车上，必须脱掉保暖手套，在屏幕上反复戳点才能打开暖风！还是还我那辆老帕萨特吧，那时候只要拧一下简单的旋钮就行！
@EBZ-z5n
Aesthetics are always secondary to passenger safety. Good on them for putting that first.
美观永远应排在乘客安全之后。他们把安全放在首位，做得好。
@zoomermcboomer4771
i also hate the electronic parking brake. I prefer the handle and trust it way more.
我也讨厌电子手刹。我更喜欢机械手柄，也更信任它。
@roropiroro6425
Bro, like, a door unable to open manually in an emergency like a crash should cause complete rejection to produce the vehicle.
Seriously ppl, safety 101. Who are they paying in the safety department???????
大家，如果一扇车门在碰撞等紧急情况下无法手动打开，那这辆车根本就不该被批准生产。
说真的，各位，这是安全常识啊！安全部门到底雇了些什么人？？？
@eilois
Why would anyone trust an electric escape system? Even the electric train got glass breaker
谁会信任一套纯电力的逃生系统？就连电动火车都配有破窗锤。
@LKH165
Perfect example of "if ain't broken, don't try to fix it"
Door handles worked fine without any issues and no one had any problems with them for a hundred years and all the sudden some engineers say "what if we could make this way more complicated, expensive, confusing and time consuming just for no reason?"
这简直是“没坏就别修”的完美例子。
门把手一百年来一直用得好好的，没人有问题，突然一些工程师说：“要是我们把它搞得更复杂、更贵、更让人困惑、更耗时，而且毫无理由呢？”
@johnpaul252003
But at what cost? erm!!! to save lives duh!
但代价是什么呢？呃！！！当然是为了拯救生命啊！
@klaymoon1
This makes a sense. A lot of sense. Deleting door handles was wrong.
这很有道理，非常有道理。取消门把手本身就是个错误。
@JuneBannister-k4s
You can still have flush door handles. They just have to have a mechanical latch as a backup.
你仍然可以使用齐平式门把手，只要配备一个机械式备用锁扣就行。
@Jay-m6p1u
Common sense and it begins in China. Good move!
常识终于出现了，而且始于中国。干得好！
@navajojohn9448
Too easy for newer cars to become coffins. All of the electrics in newer cars replacing manual controls and cables done to save manufacturers money and not for safety.
现在的车太容易变成棺材了。所有用电子系统取代手动控制和线缆的做法，都是为了给制造商省钱，而不是为了安全。
@proxieddomain
Beautiful decision to put end to a problem that shouldve never existed.
终结一个本不该存在的问题，真是个漂亮的决定。
@djslip_irie
Tesla has manual release and electronic button. It’s the Chinese ones that don’t have manual.
特斯拉有手动释放装置和电子按钮。反而是某些中国车型没有手动装置。
@sarabeth8050
Those are dumb and have virtually no effect on aerodynamics. And they break all the time, usually out of warranty costing the owner thousands of dollars to fix. Get rid of all of them. In fact, they all should be recalled and replaced with normal door handles.
这些隐藏把手很愚蠢，对空气动力学几乎毫无作用，还老是坏，通常一过保修期就得花车主几千美元修理。应该全部淘汰。事实上，它们都应该被召回，换成普通门把手。
@gaseousFumes4u
Just curious, even if it is an accessible handle, wouldn’t it typically be locked? Cars automatically lock doors when in drive right?
只是好奇一下，即使有可操作的把手，通常不也是锁着的吗？车子行驶时不是会自动锁门吗？
@liverightdieproud2189
There shd be mechanical lever that opens all doors and boot in case of crash.
事故时应该有一个能同时打开所有车门和后备箱的机械拉杆。
@ChristopherZarate-g1s
China leads the way on safety and common sense...
中国在安全和常识方面走在了前列……
@nepaliman5716
USA used to set this kinds of safety basics, now China does ... may be signs of times ahead .
过去这类安全基本规范都是美国制定的，现在轮到中国了……这或许是未来趋势的征兆。
@Pikestnt
Excellent. Well done China.
The US couldn’t do this because Elon would just go running to his boss and complain.
太棒了！中国干得漂亮。
美国做不到这一点，因为埃隆会直接跑去向他的老板投诉。
@Fisher1701-D
But at what cost.....��
但代价是什么呢……笑哭表情
@mba_leo
This is actually really good ��
这做的真的很好
@michaelguerin56
Thank you. Those handles and locking mechanisms should never have been allowed, in the first place. They should be banned in every country.
谢谢你们。这些门把手和锁止机构从一开始就不该被允许。每个国家都应该禁止它们。
@khairulhelmihashim2510
sensible action.
明智的举动。
@THUGPUTIN
For God's sake ban those flat handles and touch screen controls including 3 displays..
看在上帝的份上，把那些扁平门把手和包括三块屏幕在内的触控控制也一起禁了吧。
@lexas1
I believe Germany banned all handles that were not actual grabbable handles a long time ago. And touchscreens should be banned too. Manual controls are more direct and reliable. There's a reason airliners have manual controls.
我记得德国很久以前就禁止了所有不能实际抓握的门把手。触摸屏也应该被禁。手动控制更直接、更可靠。客机之所以保留手动控制是有原因的。
@SeanFernandes-q8y
Chinese are moving forward with safety features, whilst Europe is moving backward.
中国人在推进安全功能，而欧洲却在倒退。
@adayinthelifeofadrian
Scary to think that Tesla cars were able to bypass safety regulations and sell cars to the general public with such a dangerous flaw in safety.
想想看，特斯拉居然能绕过安全法规，向公众销售带有如此危险安全缺陷的汽车，真是可怕。
@Jay-j5n5p
Imagine Tesla redesigning the door handles for China but selling the recessed version in the US.
想象一下特斯拉为中国重新设计门把手，但在美国继续卖那种内嵌式版本。
@HassanInOrbit
why haven't they done that here yet anyway? As an engineer, who even thought of this design?
I genuinely despise when my Uber is a Tesla precisely because of these handles!
为什么我们这里还没这么做？作为一名工程师，谁会想出这种设计？
我每次坐优步遇到特斯拉都特别烦，就是因为这些门把手！
@feedthesnake3394
been saying this since 2016
我从2016年就开始说这事了。
@mssm9495
Well, that actually makes perfect sense.
嗯，中国的做法确实非常合理。
@martinp.2753
Are you telling me I'm going to have to look at a handle when I walk towards my car? That is disgusting!
你是说以后我走向我的车时还得看到一个门把手？太恶心了！（讽刺）
@thyjackal4156
Nobody wants to be burned to death inside a car...... I thought about this when I first sat in a tesla when I ordered uber. I couldnt even find the handle inside the car to get out.....
没人想在车里被活活烧死……
我第一次坐特斯拉（叫优步时）就有这种想法。我甚至找不到车内开门的把手……
@chrisgreen7725
Did we really need China to tell us that a manual mechanical release was necessary for safety?
难道真需要中国来告诉我们才能懂：安全必须要有机械式手动释放装置？
@Bill-lg1xy
No health and safety checks. They just put new technology out there, if you don't die fine, if you do they might change it.
现在车企根本没有健康与安全检查。他们只是把新技术扔出来——如果你没死，那就挺好；如果你死了，他们或许会改一下。
@williamwatitwa3534
A country with institutions that work
一个拥有有效制度的国家。
@lyttlebee
China is not just leading EV manufacturing, but also safety standardization.
中国不仅引领电动汽车制造，也引领安全标准化。
@himanshusirohi2403
Touch screen buttons for basic functionalities should be stopped . Stop those foolish buttons. Bring back physical buttons.
应停止用触摸屏控制基本功能。停止那些愚蠢的虚拟按键。把实体按键带回来。
@IvySands
Definitely required. Even in winter countries, those handles stay jammed and do not open when iced in.
绝对有必要。在寒冷国家，这些把手结冰后会卡住，无法打开。
@finesupplements9698
Italian car makers have been having hidden door latches since the 70s and still do. Where was the ban then? Oh, because it’s Tesla. Got it.
意大利车企从70年代起就有隐藏式门闩，至今仍在用。那时怎么没见禁？哦，因为这次是特斯拉。明白了。
@PeterLawton
Regular handles won't open, either, not if the door is still locked. Isn't locking the problem, not the recessed style?
普通门把手如果车门仍处于锁定状态，也打不开啊。问题在于锁止机制，而不是内嵌式设计吧？
@seventyseven1403
I WANT TO KNOW WHO AND HOW THEY PASSED SAFETY REGULATIONS???? SURELY THAT WOULD BE COMMON SENSE TO INCLUDE A MANUAL RELEASE!?!?! GIVEN ALL PREVIOUS DATA. LIKE WTH???! START HOLDING PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE! OTHERWISE THERE WILL NEVER BE CHANGE!
我想知道到底是谁、是怎么让这种设计通过安全法规的？！
基于以往所有数据，配备手动释放装置难道不是常识吗？！
赶紧追责！否则永远不会有改变！
@lailalala8624
Also EV must have a sound speaker to emit noise to alx pedestrians on coming vehicles around them.
电动车还必须配备扬声器，发出声音提醒行人附近有车辆驶来。
@jdon1737
The x and s are the ones with handles that aren’t manual and they are stopping production this year.
Model X 和 Model S 才是那种非手动门把手的车型，而且今年就要停产了。
@user-bd3bx4rh1q
Safety first. It should be done everywhere. Now let's also require every car to have a key. It is too easy to remotely reprogram and gain entry to facilitate stealing vehicles.
安全第一。全球都该这么做。另外，现在也该规定每辆车都配物理钥匙。现在远程重编程就能轻松进入车辆，太容易被盗了。
@viperine4577
����������they ban those but they keep on exporting their cars with that feature������
他们在国内禁了，却继续出口带这功能的车
@JevnyRapidMFG
Safety trumps aesthetics, always. This is a vital reminder that the coolest designs must serve life first. ������������
安全永远高于美观。这是一次重要提醒：再酷的设计，也必须首先服务于生命。
@nanookmoose
Other channels are reporting the new rules are only for new type approval so won't apply to existing model sales.
其他频道报道称，新规定仅适用于新车型认证，不会影响现有车型的销售。
@jr800w
It was so obvious. The door handle in an EV car should be mechanical as well as the handbrake. Engineers must have said no but marketing and sales yes.
这太明显了。电动车的门把手和手刹都应该是机械式的。工程师肯定反对过，但市场和销售部门说了算。
@WNR-x5v
...in most crashes doors get damaged anyway and cannot be opened neither manually or electronically...
……大多数碰撞事故中车门本身就会受损，无论手动还是电子都无法打开……
@lucasfrank8843
USA will allow Tesla to charge a subscxtion for door handles.
美国会让特斯拉对门把手收取订阅费。
@carfo
protip: there are manual releases on each of the doors on the inside, and the driver one is very easy to get to it's right near the window buttons
小提示：每扇车门内侧都有手动释放装置，驾驶员侧的那个就在车窗按钮旁边，非常容易够到。
@oohbabybloo
Windows need manual backup up too. Too much planned obsolescence is causing issues.
车窗也需要手动备用方案。太多计划性报废设计正在引发问题。
@kayjr9795
Those freaking blinding lights
还有那些该死的刺眼大灯。
@tbz1551
Isn't it more about them being electronic, than the concealed or hidden look.
问题关键不在于“隐藏”或“内嵌”的外观，而在于它们是电子的。
@TwentyEightySeven
The thing is there were flush door handles that functioned manually back in the 00’s on things like Aston Martins. Look the same as the over complicated electric ones.
其实早在2000年代，阿斯顿·马丁等车型就有齐平式门把手，但它们是纯机械的，不过看起来和现在这些复杂的电子版一模一样。
@MrDayna39
I was always concerned about those automatic locking doors, in case of an emergency it might be a challenge to get out.
我以前就一直担心那些自动上锁的车门，万一发生紧急情况，逃生可能会很困难。
@davetechme
Good! First time in Tesla was confusing AF.
做的好！我第一次坐特斯拉时简直懵了。
@matains88
My 2025 BYD has hidden door handles but you can push one corner in to get the handle pop out on the other end. The door latch itself is mechanical. I love the design, yet i'm slightly worried that people might not know to push on them when they don't pop out.
我的2025款比亚迪也有隐藏门把手，但你可以按压一端，另一端就会弹出。门锁本身是机械的。我很喜欢这个设计，但有点担心别人在它没自动弹出时不知道要按一下。
@British-AL-UK
The other issue with concealed handles is they freeze closed and you need pre-heat on to be able to open the door, not great if you don’t have much charge left.
隐藏把手的另一个问题是会冻住，你得提前预热才能开门，如果你电量不多就麻烦了。
@violetevergarden-2
As an engineer, smart design is not smart design if it's harder to use.
作为工程师，如果一个“聪明”的设计更难用，那它就不算聪明设计。
@Obsidiankitty3
They can still have a flask lever pull mechanism
他们完全可以保留齐平式的拉杆机构。
@bukwok
if want smooth looking hidden mechanical door handles , look at the Jaguar F type or something , maybe 15 years ago..?
如果想要光滑又隐藏的机械门把手，看看捷豹F-Type之类的，可能15年前就有了？
@LorenR1962
Airlines have to have easy operating exterior handles
as well as specific paint rules around to handles to make them easily visible
航空公司必须配备易于操作的外部舱门把手，而且把手周围有特定的涂装规范，确保清晰可见。
@zuxx00
Excuse my ignorance but couldn't they just break the windows in case of emergencies or are those tough to break too?
恕我无知，但紧急情况下不能直接砸窗吗？还是说那些玻璃也很难打破？
@metricstormtrooper
Good start, now make buttons on the dashboard mandatory next please.
好的开始！下一步请强制要求仪表盘上必须有实体按键。
@terdfergeson23
Just add a manual override?
加个手动应急装置不就行了？
@Savagehunter21
i was recently riding in mahindra xuv700 it too has invisible kind of door handle and it was so irritating to use
我最近坐了马恒达XUV700（印度车），它也有那种“隐形”门把手，用起来特别烦人。
@selenawolf2466
Had a cab like this the other day - cabbie didn't understand why i was plastered TOO the door the whole time, trying to make sure i knew how to get out
前几天坐了一辆这样的出租车——司机完全不理解为什么我全程紧贴车门，就为了确保自己知道怎么下车。
@marineboy1964
It's no longer a handle if you have to press a button to operate it
如果你得按按钮才能操作，那它就不再是“把手”了。
@Creee
Put buttons on the dashboard again too lol
仪表盘上的按键也该重新加上吧，哈哈。
@wazzabanzook5028
I don’t have this problem, as my doors opens even when not trying to open them
我没这问题，我的车门就算我不想开也会自己打开。
@djdevontay
Still don’t make sense. If door is locked. Still can’t enter.
还是说不通。如果车门锁着，有把手也进不去啊。
@grantmm01
I have a vehicle with concealed door handles [Mercedes] and there are times when I am unable to open the door because my key is inside the car in my handbag and the door handles have retracted but the car is technically not locked. It has not been dangerous yet, as this has happened while the car is in my garage but it is problematic.
我的车（奔驰）有隐藏门把手，有时我把钥匙放在包里，门把手缩回去了，但车并未上锁，结果我打不开门。目前还没危险过（因为都发生在自家车库），但确实很麻烦。
@lindaj5492
In a basement somewhere, there’s a young person who really appreciates ‘retro’ designs. Your time has come! ������
在某个地下室里，一定有个年轻人正痴迷于“复古”设计。你的时代来了！
@DOI_ARTS
Ban white led headlights too
也该禁掉白色LED大灯。
@burtonl7239
Would auto-locking be banned as well? What use are the handles when the doors are locked.
自动落锁功能也会被禁吗？如果门是锁着的，有把手又有什么用？
@Tomothy-e3b
China is one of the few countries left with common sense.
All the crazy smart engineers at Tesla could not figure out the obvious safety implications of electronic door handles.
Or maybe Mush had a temper tantrum and refused to allow manual handles.
中国是少数还保有常识的国家之一。
特斯拉那些所谓的“聪明”工程师，居然想不到电子门把手明显的安全隐患。
或者，也许马斯克发脾气，坚决不让用手动把手。
@3DJapan
One big problem is that many of them have electronic handles even on the inside, which stop working if the battery is damaged in a crash. Teslas have a manual release but it's often hidden and many Tesla owners don't even know they have it so they would be trapped in a crash like that.
一个大问题是，很多车连车内门把手也是电子的，一旦碰撞中电池损坏就失效了。特斯拉虽有手动释放装置，但通常藏得很隐蔽，许多车主甚至不知道它的存在，事故中就会被困住。
@johnbuckleydesigns
I’m a designer. First thing I thought when I first saw these handles. Similarly with touch screens, you need the tactile feel of a button.
我是设计师。第一次看到这种把手时，第一反应就是这个。触摸屏也一样——你需要按键的触感反馈。
@baits9301
They need to be able to manually open , not electronically .
它们必须能手动开启，而不是依赖电子系统。
@mngomints99
Everyone collectively hates Teslas.
大家集体讨厌特斯拉。
@TheAllMightyGodofCod
Good!
We ���� should be next to do it.
A few days ago I came across a Tesla with the old fashioned exposed door handles, I think the owner customized it for safety.
好！
我们欧盟应该下一个跟进。
几天前我看到一辆特斯拉装了老式外露门把手，估计车主为了安全自己改装的。
@miko_28
It's just dangerous when accidents happen.
事故一旦发生，这种设计就很危险。
@realTCG2
Dont get the issue. On the model s okay. But on model 3 you can push out the handle. What is the issue here?
我不太理解问题在哪。Model S 确实有问题，但 Model 3 的把手是可以按出来的啊？到底哪里不行？
@imugibyam
Finally, such a turn off invention
终于！这种反人类的设计早该淘汰了。
@MrFooChops
What about banning LED headlamps and bring back the incandescent bulbs. LED are VERY bad for human health, particularly eye sight
那也该禁掉LED大灯，换回白炽灯泡。LED对健康，尤其是视力，非常有害。
@envitech02
These recessed popout door handles are a death trap. I know this the very moment they appeared in the market. These look sleek, modern, futuristic and not too difficult to do, but are prone to malfunction that will render the door not being open able from outside in case of accident.
这种内嵌式弹出门把手就是死亡陷阱。从它们一上市我就意识到了。它们看起来流线、现代、未来感强，实现也不难，但容易故障，导致事故时无法从外部打开车门。
Good move, logic should prevail
好决定！逻辑终于战胜了噱头。
@fjuvo
Should be banned everywhere
这种设计全世界都该禁！
@mydrmezan
Now, bring back buttons for basic car functions
现在，把基本汽车功能的实体按键带回来吧。
@sleepystudent81
Doors should also automatically unlock when the airbags deploy
车门在安全气囊弹出时也应自动解锁。
@thuglaza4728
Just bring back cars with physical handles, physical buttons and knobs, and no data harvesting built-in computer.
干脆把带物理门把手、实体按键和旋钮、没有数据收集功能的内置电脑的汽车带回来吧。
@markmd9
I hope Europe does this too.
Design should not be above security!
希望欧洲也能这么做。设计绝不应凌驾于安全之上！
@vannustube
next ban blinding lights please!
接下来请禁止刺眼的车灯！
@mikebaginy8731
I've worked in the automobile industry as a design engineer over 30 years. It had always baffled me how such concealed doors handles could have ever been approved and legal.
Next to go should be those damned instrument panels - switches and knobs are far simpler, thus safer, to adjust while driving. Fiddling with a cell phone is prohibited but reading instructions on that screen while driving isn't? Madness.
我在汽车行业做了30多年的设计师，一直想不通这种隐藏式门把手当初是怎么通过审批并合法化的。
下一步该淘汰那些该死的仪表盘了——开车时用开关和旋钮调节要简单得多，也更安全。一边开车一边摆弄手机是被禁止的，但盯着屏幕看操作说明却不是？简直疯狂。
@youdontsay2529
I can't believe nobody saw this coming. Reliability used to be a selling point.
真不敢相信没人早料到这一点。可靠性曾经可是卖点啊。
@user-hr4ey5jr4x
This is good safety decision
这是个很好的安全决策。
@FrenchStarterFle
Interesting safety decision. In France most cars still use classic handles, sometimes old tech is safer than smart tech.
有趣的安全决策。在法国，大多数汽车仍使用传统门把手，有时候老技术比智能技术更安全。
@bluemoon8498
That design is from tesla that car markers started to copy which i found stupid. We need solid door handles and bring back ignition keys too.
这种设计源自特斯拉，后来车企纷纷效仿，我觉得很愚蠢。我们需要结实的门把手，也该把机械钥匙带回来。
@andrew_sharp
I'd also ban putting essential car controls onto LCD screens! Just imagine, it's -20C degrees. I'm in a brand new MG crossover and I need to take off my warm gloves to mash through all this on-screen interface to switch the heater on! Bring me back my old Passat where the matter was just to turn damn simple handle!
我也主张禁止把关键车辆控制功能放在液晶屏幕上！想象一下，零下20摄氏度，我坐在一辆全新的MG跨界车上，必须脱掉保暖手套，在屏幕上反复戳点才能打开暖风！还是还我那辆老帕萨特吧，那时候只要拧一下简单的旋钮就行！
@EBZ-z5n
Aesthetics are always secondary to passenger safety. Good on them for putting that first.
美观永远应排在乘客安全之后。他们把安全放在首位，做得好。
@zoomermcboomer4771
i also hate the electronic parking brake. I prefer the handle and trust it way more.
我也讨厌电子手刹。我更喜欢机械手柄，也更信任它。
@roropiroro6425
Bro, like, a door unable to open manually in an emergency like a crash should cause complete rejection to produce the vehicle.
Seriously ppl, safety 101. Who are they paying in the safety department???????
大家，如果一扇车门在碰撞等紧急情况下无法手动打开，那这辆车根本就不该被批准生产。
说真的，各位，这是安全常识啊！安全部门到底雇了些什么人？？？
@eilois
Why would anyone trust an electric escape system? Even the electric train got glass breaker
谁会信任一套纯电力的逃生系统？就连电动火车都配有破窗锤。
@LKH165
Perfect example of "if ain't broken, don't try to fix it"
Door handles worked fine without any issues and no one had any problems with them for a hundred years and all the sudden some engineers say "what if we could make this way more complicated, expensive, confusing and time consuming just for no reason?"
这简直是“没坏就别修”的完美例子。
门把手一百年来一直用得好好的，没人有问题，突然一些工程师说：“要是我们把它搞得更复杂、更贵、更让人困惑、更耗时，而且毫无理由呢？”
@johnpaul252003
But at what cost? erm!!! to save lives duh!
但代价是什么呢？呃！！！当然是为了拯救生命啊！
@klaymoon1
This makes a sense. A lot of sense. Deleting door handles was wrong.
这很有道理，非常有道理。取消门把手本身就是个错误。
@JuneBannister-k4s
You can still have flush door handles. They just have to have a mechanical latch as a backup.
你仍然可以使用齐平式门把手，只要配备一个机械式备用锁扣就行。
@Jay-m6p1u
Common sense and it begins in China. Good move!
常识终于出现了，而且始于中国。干得好！
@navajojohn9448
Too easy for newer cars to become coffins. All of the electrics in newer cars replacing manual controls and cables done to save manufacturers money and not for safety.
现在的车太容易变成棺材了。所有用电子系统取代手动控制和线缆的做法，都是为了给制造商省钱，而不是为了安全。
@proxieddomain
Beautiful decision to put end to a problem that shouldve never existed.
终结一个本不该存在的问题，真是个漂亮的决定。
@djslip_irie
Tesla has manual release and electronic button. It’s the Chinese ones that don’t have manual.
特斯拉有手动释放装置和电子按钮。反而是某些中国车型没有手动装置。
@sarabeth8050
Those are dumb and have virtually no effect on aerodynamics. And they break all the time, usually out of warranty costing the owner thousands of dollars to fix. Get rid of all of them. In fact, they all should be recalled and replaced with normal door handles.
这些隐藏把手很愚蠢，对空气动力学几乎毫无作用，还老是坏，通常一过保修期就得花车主几千美元修理。应该全部淘汰。事实上，它们都应该被召回，换成普通门把手。
@gaseousFumes4u
Just curious, even if it is an accessible handle, wouldn’t it typically be locked? Cars automatically lock doors when in drive right?
只是好奇一下，即使有可操作的把手，通常不也是锁着的吗？车子行驶时不是会自动锁门吗？
@liverightdieproud2189
There shd be mechanical lever that opens all doors and boot in case of crash.
事故时应该有一个能同时打开所有车门和后备箱的机械拉杆。
@ChristopherZarate-g1s
China leads the way on safety and common sense...
中国在安全和常识方面走在了前列……
@nepaliman5716
USA used to set this kinds of safety basics, now China does ... may be signs of times ahead .
过去这类安全基本规范都是美国制定的，现在轮到中国了……这或许是未来趋势的征兆。
@Pikestnt
Excellent. Well done China.
The US couldn’t do this because Elon would just go running to his boss and complain.
太棒了！中国干得漂亮。
美国做不到这一点，因为埃隆会直接跑去向他的老板投诉。
@Fisher1701-D
But at what cost.....��
但代价是什么呢……笑哭表情
@mba_leo
This is actually really good ��
这做的真的很好
@michaelguerin56
Thank you. Those handles and locking mechanisms should never have been allowed, in the first place. They should be banned in every country.
谢谢你们。这些门把手和锁止机构从一开始就不该被允许。每个国家都应该禁止它们。
@khairulhelmihashim2510
sensible action.
明智的举动。
@THUGPUTIN
For God's sake ban those flat handles and touch screen controls including 3 displays..
看在上帝的份上，把那些扁平门把手和包括三块屏幕在内的触控控制也一起禁了吧。
@lexas1
I believe Germany banned all handles that were not actual grabbable handles a long time ago. And touchscreens should be banned too. Manual controls are more direct and reliable. There's a reason airliners have manual controls.
我记得德国很久以前就禁止了所有不能实际抓握的门把手。触摸屏也应该被禁。手动控制更直接、更可靠。客机之所以保留手动控制是有原因的。
@SeanFernandes-q8y
Chinese are moving forward with safety features, whilst Europe is moving backward.
中国人在推进安全功能，而欧洲却在倒退。
@adayinthelifeofadrian
Scary to think that Tesla cars were able to bypass safety regulations and sell cars to the general public with such a dangerous flaw in safety.
想想看，特斯拉居然能绕过安全法规，向公众销售带有如此危险安全缺陷的汽车，真是可怕。
@Jay-j5n5p
Imagine Tesla redesigning the door handles for China but selling the recessed version in the US.
想象一下特斯拉为中国重新设计门把手，但在美国继续卖那种内嵌式版本。
@HassanInOrbit
why haven't they done that here yet anyway? As an engineer, who even thought of this design?
I genuinely despise when my Uber is a Tesla precisely because of these handles!
为什么我们这里还没这么做？作为一名工程师，谁会想出这种设计？
我每次坐优步遇到特斯拉都特别烦，就是因为这些门把手！
@feedthesnake3394
been saying this since 2016
我从2016年就开始说这事了。
@mssm9495
Well, that actually makes perfect sense.
嗯，中国的做法确实非常合理。
@martinp.2753
Are you telling me I'm going to have to look at a handle when I walk towards my car? That is disgusting!
你是说以后我走向我的车时还得看到一个门把手？太恶心了！（讽刺）
@thyjackal4156
Nobody wants to be burned to death inside a car...... I thought about this when I first sat in a tesla when I ordered uber. I couldnt even find the handle inside the car to get out.....
没人想在车里被活活烧死……
我第一次坐特斯拉（叫优步时）就有这种想法。我甚至找不到车内开门的把手……
@chrisgreen7725
Did we really need China to tell us that a manual mechanical release was necessary for safety?
难道真需要中国来告诉我们才能懂：安全必须要有机械式手动释放装置？
@Bill-lg1xy
No health and safety checks. They just put new technology out there, if you don't die fine, if you do they might change it.
现在车企根本没有健康与安全检查。他们只是把新技术扔出来——如果你没死，那就挺好；如果你死了，他们或许会改一下。
@williamwatitwa3534
A country with institutions that work
一个拥有有效制度的国家。
@lyttlebee
China is not just leading EV manufacturing, but also safety standardization.
中国不仅引领电动汽车制造，也引领安全标准化。
@himanshusirohi2403
Touch screen buttons for basic functionalities should be stopped . Stop those foolish buttons. Bring back physical buttons.
应停止用触摸屏控制基本功能。停止那些愚蠢的虚拟按键。把实体按键带回来。
@IvySands
Definitely required. Even in winter countries, those handles stay jammed and do not open when iced in.
绝对有必要。在寒冷国家，这些把手结冰后会卡住，无法打开。
@finesupplements9698
Italian car makers have been having hidden door latches since the 70s and still do. Where was the ban then? Oh, because it’s Tesla. Got it.
意大利车企从70年代起就有隐藏式门闩，至今仍在用。那时怎么没见禁？哦，因为这次是特斯拉。明白了。
@PeterLawton
Regular handles won't open, either, not if the door is still locked. Isn't locking the problem, not the recessed style?
普通门把手如果车门仍处于锁定状态，也打不开啊。问题在于锁止机制，而不是内嵌式设计吧？
@seventyseven1403
I WANT TO KNOW WHO AND HOW THEY PASSED SAFETY REGULATIONS???? SURELY THAT WOULD BE COMMON SENSE TO INCLUDE A MANUAL RELEASE!?!?! GIVEN ALL PREVIOUS DATA. LIKE WTH???! START HOLDING PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE! OTHERWISE THERE WILL NEVER BE CHANGE!
我想知道到底是谁、是怎么让这种设计通过安全法规的？！
基于以往所有数据，配备手动释放装置难道不是常识吗？！
赶紧追责！否则永远不会有改变！
@lailalala8624
Also EV must have a sound speaker to emit noise to alx pedestrians on coming vehicles around them.
电动车还必须配备扬声器，发出声音提醒行人附近有车辆驶来。
@jdon1737
The x and s are the ones with handles that aren’t manual and they are stopping production this year.
Model X 和 Model S 才是那种非手动门把手的车型，而且今年就要停产了。
@user-bd3bx4rh1q
Safety first. It should be done everywhere. Now let's also require every car to have a key. It is too easy to remotely reprogram and gain entry to facilitate stealing vehicles.
安全第一。全球都该这么做。另外，现在也该规定每辆车都配物理钥匙。现在远程重编程就能轻松进入车辆，太容易被盗了。
@viperine4577
����������they ban those but they keep on exporting their cars with that feature������
他们在国内禁了，却继续出口带这功能的车
@JevnyRapidMFG
Safety trumps aesthetics, always. This is a vital reminder that the coolest designs must serve life first. ������������
安全永远高于美观。这是一次重要提醒：再酷的设计，也必须首先服务于生命。
@nanookmoose
Other channels are reporting the new rules are only for new type approval so won't apply to existing model sales.
其他频道报道称，新规定仅适用于新车型认证，不会影响现有车型的销售。
@jr800w
It was so obvious. The door handle in an EV car should be mechanical as well as the handbrake. Engineers must have said no but marketing and sales yes.
这太明显了。电动车的门把手和手刹都应该是机械式的。工程师肯定反对过，但市场和销售部门说了算。
@WNR-x5v
...in most crashes doors get damaged anyway and cannot be opened neither manually or electronically...
……大多数碰撞事故中车门本身就会受损，无论手动还是电子都无法打开……
@lucasfrank8843
USA will allow Tesla to charge a subscxtion for door handles.
美国会让特斯拉对门把手收取订阅费。
@carfo
protip: there are manual releases on each of the doors on the inside, and the driver one is very easy to get to it's right near the window buttons
小提示：每扇车门内侧都有手动释放装置，驾驶员侧的那个就在车窗按钮旁边，非常容易够到。
@oohbabybloo
Windows need manual backup up too. Too much planned obsolescence is causing issues.
车窗也需要手动备用方案。太多计划性报废设计正在引发问题。
@kayjr9795
Those freaking blinding lights
还有那些该死的刺眼大灯。
@tbz1551
Isn't it more about them being electronic, than the concealed or hidden look.
问题关键不在于“隐藏”或“内嵌”的外观，而在于它们是电子的。
@TwentyEightySeven
The thing is there were flush door handles that functioned manually back in the 00’s on things like Aston Martins. Look the same as the over complicated electric ones.
其实早在2000年代，阿斯顿·马丁等车型就有齐平式门把手，但它们是纯机械的，不过看起来和现在这些复杂的电子版一模一样。
@MrDayna39
I was always concerned about those automatic locking doors, in case of an emergency it might be a challenge to get out.
我以前就一直担心那些自动上锁的车门，万一发生紧急情况，逃生可能会很困难。
@davetechme
Good! First time in Tesla was confusing AF.
做的好！我第一次坐特斯拉时简直懵了。
@matains88
My 2025 BYD has hidden door handles but you can push one corner in to get the handle pop out on the other end. The door latch itself is mechanical. I love the design, yet i'm slightly worried that people might not know to push on them when they don't pop out.
我的2025款比亚迪也有隐藏门把手，但你可以按压一端，另一端就会弹出。门锁本身是机械的。我很喜欢这个设计，但有点担心别人在它没自动弹出时不知道要按一下。
@British-AL-UK
The other issue with concealed handles is they freeze closed and you need pre-heat on to be able to open the door, not great if you don’t have much charge left.
隐藏把手的另一个问题是会冻住，你得提前预热才能开门，如果你电量不多就麻烦了。
@violetevergarden-2
As an engineer, smart design is not smart design if it's harder to use.
作为工程师，如果一个“聪明”的设计更难用，那它就不算聪明设计。
@Obsidiankitty3
They can still have a flask lever pull mechanism
他们完全可以保留齐平式的拉杆机构。
@bukwok
if want smooth looking hidden mechanical door handles , look at the Jaguar F type or something , maybe 15 years ago..?
如果想要光滑又隐藏的机械门把手，看看捷豹F-Type之类的，可能15年前就有了？
@LorenR1962
Airlines have to have easy operating exterior handles
as well as specific paint rules around to handles to make them easily visible
航空公司必须配备易于操作的外部舱门把手，而且把手周围有特定的涂装规范，确保清晰可见。
@zuxx00
Excuse my ignorance but couldn't they just break the windows in case of emergencies or are those tough to break too?
恕我无知，但紧急情况下不能直接砸窗吗？还是说那些玻璃也很难打破？
@metricstormtrooper
Good start, now make buttons on the dashboard mandatory next please.
好的开始！下一步请强制要求仪表盘上必须有实体按键。
@terdfergeson23
Just add a manual override?
加个手动应急装置不就行了？
@Savagehunter21
i was recently riding in mahindra xuv700 it too has invisible kind of door handle and it was so irritating to use
我最近坐了马恒达XUV700（印度车），它也有那种“隐形”门把手，用起来特别烦人。
@selenawolf2466
Had a cab like this the other day - cabbie didn't understand why i was plastered TOO the door the whole time, trying to make sure i knew how to get out
前几天坐了一辆这样的出租车——司机完全不理解为什么我全程紧贴车门，就为了确保自己知道怎么下车。
@marineboy1964
It's no longer a handle if you have to press a button to operate it
如果你得按按钮才能操作，那它就不再是“把手”了。
@Creee
Put buttons on the dashboard again too lol
仪表盘上的按键也该重新加上吧，哈哈。
@wazzabanzook5028
I don’t have this problem, as my doors opens even when not trying to open them
我没这问题，我的车门就算我不想开也会自己打开。
@djdevontay
Still don’t make sense. If door is locked. Still can’t enter.
还是说不通。如果车门锁着，有把手也进不去啊。
@grantmm01
I have a vehicle with concealed door handles [Mercedes] and there are times when I am unable to open the door because my key is inside the car in my handbag and the door handles have retracted but the car is technically not locked. It has not been dangerous yet, as this has happened while the car is in my garage but it is problematic.
我的车（奔驰）有隐藏门把手，有时我把钥匙放在包里，门把手缩回去了，但车并未上锁，结果我打不开门。目前还没危险过（因为都发生在自家车库），但确实很麻烦。
@lindaj5492
In a basement somewhere, there’s a young person who really appreciates ‘retro’ designs. Your time has come! ������
在某个地下室里，一定有个年轻人正痴迷于“复古”设计。你的时代来了！
@DOI_ARTS
Ban white led headlights too
也该禁掉白色LED大灯。
@burtonl7239
Would auto-locking be banned as well? What use are the handles when the doors are locked.
自动落锁功能也会被禁吗？如果门是锁着的，有把手又有什么用？
@Tomothy-e3b
China is one of the few countries left with common sense.
All the crazy smart engineers at Tesla could not figure out the obvious safety implications of electronic door handles.
Or maybe Mush had a temper tantrum and refused to allow manual handles.
中国是少数还保有常识的国家之一。
特斯拉那些所谓的“聪明”工程师，居然想不到电子门把手明显的安全隐患。
或者，也许马斯克发脾气，坚决不让用手动把手。
@3DJapan
One big problem is that many of them have electronic handles even on the inside, which stop working if the battery is damaged in a crash. Teslas have a manual release but it's often hidden and many Tesla owners don't even know they have it so they would be trapped in a crash like that.
一个大问题是，很多车连车内门把手也是电子的，一旦碰撞中电池损坏就失效了。特斯拉虽有手动释放装置，但通常藏得很隐蔽，许多车主甚至不知道它的存在，事故中就会被困住。
@johnbuckleydesigns
I’m a designer. First thing I thought when I first saw these handles. Similarly with touch screens, you need the tactile feel of a button.
我是设计师。第一次看到这种把手时，第一反应就是这个。触摸屏也一样——你需要按键的触感反馈。
@baits9301
They need to be able to manually open , not electronically .
它们必须能手动开启，而不是依赖电子系统。
@mngomints99
Everyone collectively hates Teslas.
大家集体讨厌特斯拉。
@TheAllMightyGodofCod
Good!
We ���� should be next to do it.
A few days ago I came across a Tesla with the old fashioned exposed door handles, I think the owner customized it for safety.
好！
我们欧盟应该下一个跟进。
几天前我看到一辆特斯拉装了老式外露门把手，估计车主为了安全自己改装的。
@miko_28
It's just dangerous when accidents happen.
事故一旦发生，这种设计就很危险。
@realTCG2
Dont get the issue. On the model s okay. But on model 3 you can push out the handle. What is the issue here?
我不太理解问题在哪。Model S 确实有问题，但 Model 3 的把手是可以按出来的啊？到底哪里不行？
@imugibyam
Finally, such a turn off invention
终于！这种反人类的设计早该淘汰了。
@MrFooChops
What about banning LED headlamps and bring back the incandescent bulbs. LED are VERY bad for human health, particularly eye sight
那也该禁掉LED大灯，换回白炽灯泡。LED对健康，尤其是视力，非常有害。
@envitech02
These recessed popout door handles are a death trap. I know this the very moment they appeared in the market. These look sleek, modern, futuristic and not too difficult to do, but are prone to malfunction that will render the door not being open able from outside in case of accident.
这种内嵌式弹出门把手就是死亡陷阱。从它们一上市我就意识到了。它们看起来流线、现代、未来感强，实现也不难，但容易故障，导致事故时无法从外部打开车门。
很赞 13
收藏