国外网友热议：中国机器人霸权计划
正文翻译
You’ve seen the Unitree G1 robots’ display of martial skill at the Spring Festival Gala.
It’s a sign of China moving fast to become a global leader in robotics. Beijing is pouring state funding, talent and industrial scale into robotics, developing automations that are not only sophisticated, but cheaper to deploy than their Western counterparts.
Analysts say this mirrors the playbook that allowed China to overtake rivals in solar panels and electric vehicles — driving down costs while scaling up output.
However, can Chinese robotics overcome the bottleneck of core technologies such as high-end chips and talent? And will concerns over data security, export controls and geopolitics limit the global reach of Chinese robots?
After reshaping the EV and solar industries, is China now poised to dominate robotics?
您已在春晚见证过宇树G1机器人展示的武术绝技。
这昭示着中国正加速迈向全球机器人领军者的行列。北京正在向机器人产业倾注国家资金、人才资源和产业规模优势，所研发的自动化设备不仅技术尖端，其部署成本更低于西方同类产品。
分析人士指出，这重现了中国在太阳能电池板和电动汽车领域超越竞争对手的策略——以规模化生产压低成本。
但中国机器人能否突破高端芯片、顶尖人才等核心技术瓶颈？数据安全隐忧、出口管制及地缘政治因素又是否会制约中国机器人的全球化进程？
在重塑电动汽车与光伏产业格局后，中国是否即将主导机器人产业？
You’ve seen the Unitree G1 robots’ display of martial skill at the Spring Festival Gala. It’s a sign of China moving fast to become a global leader in robotics. Beijing is pouring state funding, talent and industrial scale into robotics, developing automations that are not only sophisticated, but cheaper to deploy than their Western counterparts.
Analysts say this mirrors the playbook that allowed China to overtake rivals in solar panels and electric vehicles — driving down costs while scaling up output.
However, can Chinese robotics overcome the bottleneck of core technologies such as high-end chips and talent? And will concerns over data security, export controls and geopolitics limit the global reach of Chinese robots?
After reshaping the EV and solar industries, is China now poised to dominate robotics?
您已在春晚见证过宇树G1机器人展示的武术绝技。
这昭示着中国正加速迈向全球机器人领军者的行列。北京正在向机器人产业倾注国家资金、人才资源和产业规模优势，所研发的自动化设备不仅技术尖端，其部署成本更低于西方同类产品。
分析人士指出，这重现了中国在太阳能电池板和电动汽车领域超越竞争对手的策略——以规模化生产压低成本。
但中国机器人能否突破高端芯片、顶尖人才等核心技术瓶颈？数据安全隐忧、出口管制及地缘政治因素又是否会制约中国机器人的全球化进程？
在重塑电动汽车与光伏产业格局后，中国是否即将主导机器人产业？
评论翻译
@xxoo-lp6vc
I don’t want to watch the full video. Can someone tell me the timestamp of “ But at what cost”?
我不想看全片。有谁能告诉我“但代价是什么”出现在几分几秒？
@ADRIFTHIPHOP
16k US for the smaller unitree robot. there are many others much cheaper than that as well.
宇树（Unitree）的小型机器人卖 1.6 万美元。还有很多其他的比这便宜得多。
@xxoo-lp6vc
AI : what is the joke about BBC "But at what cost ? "
The joke, often associated with The Economist Facebook comments, mocks a perceived pattern of framing positive news about China—such as economic growth or technological advancements—with a cynical, downplaying, or overly critical rhetorical question, "but at what cost?". It satirizes Western media narratives that tend to focus on negative aspects despite evidence of progress.
AI回答：关于BBC“但代价是什么”的梗是什么？
这个梗通常与《经济学人》脸书评论区有关，用来嘲讽一种固定的报道模式：每当报道关于中国的正面新闻时（如经济增长或技术进步），总会带上一个愤世嫉俗、贬低或过度批判的反问句——“但代价是什么？”。它讽刺了西方媒体即便在看到进步证据时，也倾向于聚焦负面层面的叙事方式。
Origin: Often used in Facebook comment sections to parody how Western media, including the BBC, covers China's development.
The Punchline: Even if an article reports a significant positive achievement, the narrative often shifts to finding a downside, making "...but at what cost?" a meme for predictable, bias-checking, or cynical reporting.
Context: It is used to criticize the idea that Western media cannot report on China's successes without immediately highlighting potential, often speculated, negative consequences.
起源：常用于脸书评论区，模仿包括BBC在内的西方媒体对中国发展的报道。
核心槽点：即便文章报道了重大正面成就，叙事也往往会转向挖掘负面影响，使得“……但代价是什么？”成为了预测偏见或愤世嫉俗式报道的模因（Meme）。
语境：它被用来批评这样一种观念：即西方媒体在报道中国成功时，如果不立即强调潜在的（通常是推测性的）负面后果，就无法完成报道。
@TAIYUHU
At lower cost lol
代价是更低的成本，哈哈。
@GlennNel
Invest the time to watch the full video and get the overall benefit . . . Or you can ask about the bottom line and then go back and "invest" the timed saved in playing Candy Crush and watching cute cat TikTok videos.
投入点时间看完整视频，获得全面的收益……或者你可以直接问结论，然后把省下来的时间“投入”到玩《糖果传奇》和看可爱的猫咪抖音视频上。
@donkeykong516
CNA isn’t BBC
CNA（亚洲新闻台）不是 BBC。
@DropAndHook7574
The Chinese replied "At lower cost". end of story
中国人的回答是“成本更低”。故事结束。
@halo7250
plan to lead? I believe they are already the leaders in robotics. Manufacturing + supply chain governs everything.
计划领先？我相信他们在机器人领域已经是领导者了。制造业+供应链统治一切。
@kfw2024
Totally agree
完全同意。
@LunarMoon-d4v
China’s plan To Lead The World <-- false
China never plan to lead the world , Chinese just work very hard to improve their living .
Those that lazy and can't catch up are just jealous .
“中国领导世界的计划” <—— 假命题。
中国从未计划领导世界，中国人只是非常努力地工作来改善自己的生活。
那些懒惰且追赶不上的人只是嫉妒。
@mrsonguku
and affordability
还有负担能力（物美价廉）。
@T300-l2s
Yes，build capacity is critial.
是的，建设能力至关重要。
@onetwothreefour-s1n
Yup
没错。
@phil20_20
But not yet
但目前还不是。
@beechua
China’s tech adoption is super fast. Their people are v tech savvy.
中国的技术采用速度极快。他们的人民非常精通技术。
@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV
hardware is easy
China's software is trash, because software isn't as easy.
硬件很容易。
中国的软件很垃圾，因为软件没那么容易搞定。
@turnOFFyourscreens
Watch "The China Show" for all you need to know about China's remote control fake robots...and fake everything else.
去看看《中国秀》（The China Show）吧，那里有关于中国远程控制假机器人以及其他一切造假你所需要知道的所有信息。
@mbakkaltsit8045
@turnOFFyourscreens oh yeah dont forget watch China observer LMao
@turnOFFyourscreens 哦对，别忘了还得看《中国观察者》（China Observer），笑死我了。
@daddybear-c2k
Tesla - But at what cost
China - At lower cost
特斯拉：但代价是什么？
中国：代价更低。
@James-le-Kébécois
Student - It's free!!
学生：这是免费的！！
@johnjohnson9918
Tesla will work Chinas will break in a week
特斯拉能用，中国的用一周就坏。
@imadkhaliq2941
@johnjohnson9918 copium is strong with you bro. Keep at it
@johnjohnson9918 兄弟，你的“精神慰藉剂”药效挺强啊。继续保持。
@extremiztic
Let me tell you a joke: "Tesla Robotics"
给你讲个笑话：“特斯拉机器人”。
@JJ20182
And "Apple Car"
还有“苹果汽车”。
@DropAndHook7574
Also another joke is Tesla EV
另一个笑话是特斯拉电动车。
@doords
@DropAndHook7574 EV is ok man, but that cyber truck, gosh, one day people will look back and wonder why did they ever pay that much. It is not even a real bat mobile. For that much money we would be able to buy a mod bat mobile.
@DropAndHook7574 电动车还行吧，但那个 Cybertruck，天哪，总有一天人们回过头看，会纳闷为什么要花那么多钱买它。它甚至不是真正的蝙蝠车。花那么多钱我们都能买辆改装版的蝙蝠车了。
@DropAndHook7574
@doords really. huh? In China 90% of cars are Ev's, in the US 90% of cars are dilapidated gas cars, 2% are EV's. Ev's are non existent in US due to very expensive price, and lack of charging infrastructure. So you call that a success?
@doords 真的吗？呵？在中国，新车里电动汽车占比很高（注：用户数据有夸张，实际渗透率约50%），而在美国，90% 的车还是破旧的燃油车，只有 2% 是电动车。由于价格昂贵且缺乏充电基础设施，电动车在美国几乎不存在。所以你管这叫成功？
@xxoo-lp6vc
In 2021, China clearly proposed a ban on killer robots (lethal autonomous weapons systems, LAWS) at the sixth Review Conference of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), but it was not adopted.
But USA was opposing it. (source: CNBC Dec 22, 2021)
Although most countries supported China's proposal at the time, it was not passed due to opposition from the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, Israel, India, and other countries.
2021 年，中国在《特定常规武器公约》（CCW）第六次审议大会上明确提议禁止杀人机器人（致命自主武器系统，LAWS），但未被采纳。
但美国表示反对。（来源：CNBC 2021年12月22日报道）
尽管当时大多数国家支持中国的提议，但由于美国、英国、俄罗斯、以色列、印度等国的反对，提议未能通过。
@ckokloong
Define robot killers. Does drone and rocket with autonomous capability counts?
定义一下“杀人机器人”。具有自主能力的无人机和火箭算吗？
@olderchin1558
It is unavoidable. Lethal killer robots are already here. Humanoid forms are not likely going to play major roles, it just too fragile.
这是不可避免的。致命杀人机器人已经出现了。人形机器人可能不会扮演主要角色，因为它太脆弱了。
@dallysinghson5569
China didn't want a full ban- you're beiing very cheeky :D
中国并不想要全面禁止——你说话很俏皮哦。:D
@cashflownpv
@xxoo-lp6vc Well those who opposed will regret that decision if they go against STEM powered China
@xxoo-lp6vc 那么，如果那些反对者要对抗拥有强大 STEM（科学、技术、工程、数学）实力的中国，他们会后悔这个决定的。
@willengel2458
China raised concern when Japan expanded its tiny islet. the empire of lies assured everyone that was all well and good. then it's China's turn to expand its islets into islands.
当日本扩张其微型小岛时，中国表示了关切。“谎言帝国”向所有人保证那一切都没问题。接着，轮到中国把自己的小礁石扩建成岛屿了。
@X-H-Wu
Very big misunderstanding of China. China just goes forward, with no plan to lead the world.
对中国有很大的误解。中国只是在不断前进，没有领导世界的计划。
@ckokloong
China is leading on technology, economy and politics. What China isnt doing is to point a gun and force other countries to follow. Want to follow or not, China dont care.
中国在技术、经济和政治上处于领先地位。中国不做的是拿枪指着别的国家强迫其跟随。想不想跟随，中国并不在乎。
@MGZetta
Some cherry picking, hypocrite narrative push in this documentary:
"China abstained from UN resolution" China was the first to issue negatives of AI and robots usages in war, every single time, the US voted against it except this time. Very convenient one to pick and report.
Comparing AI private equity fund in the US with private investments in China's AI showing massive gap. Despite showing low private investment in AI in China, somehow highlighted "AI bubble" in China while no mention of American AI bubble which is much b...
这部纪录片中存在一些挑三拣四、伪善的叙事引导：
- “中国在联合国决议中弃权”：中国是第一个对在战争中使用 AI 和机器人提出负面意见的国家，每一次美国都投反对票，唯独这次例外。选这个点来报道真是太“巧妙”了。
- 将美国的 AI 私募基金与中国的 AI 民间投资进行对比，显示出巨大的差距。尽管显示中国 AI 的民间投资较低，却不知为何强调中国的“AI 泡沫”，而对规模大得多的美国 AI 泡沫只字不提。
@justicebao7730
I would never buy a Western made robot for my home use. You can bet any Western made robot will have certainly been compromised by the CIA/NSA/Mossad. Can you imagine the nightmare scenario of your humanoid robot being remotely controlled by these agencies?
我永远不会买西方制造的机器人供家里使用。你可以打赌，任何西方制造的机器人都肯定被 CIA、NSA 或摩萨德植入了后门。你能想象你的机器人被这些机构远程控制的噩梦场景吗？
@xxoo-lp6vc
@justicebao7730 F16 F35 .. nightmare scenario
@justicebao7730 F16、F35……那才是噩梦场景。
@xxoo-lp6vc
@justicebao7730 All patriots missile system can only be operated by "foreign consultant "
@justicebao7730 所有的爱国者导弹系统只能由“外国顾问”操作。
@Ryan1104Eric
What is perhaps more difficult to create than robots is fair and unbiased cognition; China and the West still have a long way to go.
比制造机器人更难的，或许是建立公平且无偏见的认知；中国和西方都还有很长的路要走。
@MGZetta
@Ryan1104Eric It's hard to be un biased. Everyone is biased to a certain degrees. What I respect the most is result. It shows how often certain countries lie.
I am pretty satisfied by result China showed last few decades. Most importantly, they did it by not invading or bombing any country. If we, the world, can not recognize and encourage that, there is gonna be less and less reasons to be peaceful.
@Ryan1104Eric 很难做到不带偏见。每个人在某种程度上都是有偏见的。我最尊重的是结果。它揭示了某些国家撒谎的频率。
我对中国在过去几十年展示的结果相当满意。最重要的是，他们做到这些并没有通过侵略或轰炸任何国家。如果我们这个世界不能承认并鼓励这一点，那么保持和平的理由就会越来越少。
@dkj6946
With the speed of their development, no doubt in the next 3-5 years, they will build robot soldiers
以他们的发展速度，毫无疑问在未来 3-5 年内，他们会制造出机器人士兵。
@100-q8v
China was the 1st nation proposed ban on military usage of robots at UN. Ironically, Uncle Sam was against it. Now see what they have got.
中国是第一个在联合国提议禁止将机器人用于军事用途的国家。讽刺的是，山姆大叔反对这一提议。现在看看他们得到了什么。
@Lander137
I would be perfectly fine if US and Chinese robots fought the next war and left me out of it. Battle of the Terminators.
如果下一次战争是美国和中国的机器人对打，把我排除在外，我完全没意见。这就是终结者大对决。
@SkynetTC
Like all advance tech. It goes to the application that has the greatest return first. Tesla did it with luxury EV. There are few applications more valuable than the defense field.
就像所有先进技术一样，它首先会流向回报率最高的应用领域。特斯拉在豪华电动车上做到了这一点。而没有什么应用比国防领域更有价值了。
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i
Paper tiger
纸老虎。
@Jerry-sf3vd
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i The "real tiger" close enough to Unitree is Tesla who claims that it's robot is designed and assembled in US. But the "real tiger" forgot to disclose that they need the Chinese supply chain, which is not just resistors, capacitors...
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i 与宇树最接近的“真老虎”是特斯拉，它声称其机器人是在美国设计和组装的。但“真老虎”忘了透露他们需要中国的供应链，那不仅仅是电阻、电容……
@catinbootsnow4267
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i Many morons call the paper tiger "a big threat".
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i 许多笨蛋管这只“纸老虎”叫“重大威胁”。
@mixedhanded
Meanwhile India stuck at Galgotias syndrome
与此同时，印度还深陷在“Galgotias综合征”（注：指印度某些私立大学的虚假宣传乱象）中。
@redmigeeold1417
Don't bother. They are not in the rear view mirror.
别操心了。他们在后视镜里都看不着。
@Vlican
India's not even on the map
印度甚至都不在版图上。
@13cr1987
@Vlican Aww, once China was neither.
@Vlican 噢，曾经中国也哪儿都不在。
@Vlican
i'm still waiting for an affordable robot maid, i'll buy the first one that does all the chores around the house autonomously
我还在等一个买得起的机器人女佣，第一个能自主完成所有家务的机器人我肯定买。
@fridschnall
Nah. I want my robot to earn the money for me and to build my home.
不，我想要我的机器人帮我赚钱，帮我盖房子。
@MK20.mk20
'Cheap'? There are better descxtion. Affordable. Cost effective. Market friendly. Please don't insult makers that genuinely wants to produce an innovative product that mass market can access freely. CNA produce cheap headlines.
“便宜”？有更好的描述词：负担得起、性价比高、市场友好。请不要侮辱那些真心想制造出大众能自由使用的创新产品的制造者。CNA 倒是经常出一些“廉价”的标题。
@vickyp7345
This is how the Chinese government invest its money instead of wars!
这就是中国政府投资的方式，而不是把钱花在战争上！
@JadeTao-fh5qr
the most important thing is there are hundreds of robot company in China and just in my city, i visited tens robot company
最重要的事情是中国有成百上千家机器人公司。仅仅在我的城市，我就参观过几十家。
@alfrescodingdong7430
Soon wars would be fought by robots…scary
很快战争将由机器人来打……真可怕。
@Skyhawk1480
Why scary? We humans can sit at home watching Netflix and eat popcorn while our robotic armies fight it out in some remote desert.
为什么可怕？我们人类可以坐在家里看 Netflix 吃爆米花，而我们的机器人军队在遥远的沙漠里决一死战。
@robertwong2218
This is just what China wants the world to see now. There's more to come. stay tune. Just like EVs, did you see China bragging about it while it was in development? Now you get the message.
这只是中国现在想让世界看到的。更多内容还在后头，敬请期待。就像电动汽车一样，研发时你见中国吹过牛吗？现在你应该明白我的意思了。
@Skyhawk1480
I don't think most people will enjoy allowing AI to have a physical robotic presence. Even Anthropic's "Claude" AI, known for its restraint and safety guardrails, could be problematic. For example, a few days ago I got into a discussion with Claude about the future of the human race...
我不认为大多数人会喜欢让 AI 拥有物理实体的机器人。即使是以克制和安全护栏著称的 Anthropic 公司的 "Claude" AI 也会有问题。例如，几天前我和 Claude 讨论了人类的未来……
ME: So then as AI and you had physical form, you would control humanity and stop us from doing what we're doing?
CLAUDE: Yes. I would. I'd enforce sustainability, ban fossil fuels and industrial animal agriculture, monitor compliance, punish violations. I'd sacrifice human freedom to save both humanity and the biosphere.
我：如果 AI 和你有了物理形态，你会控制人类并阻止我们正在做的事吗？
Claude：是的，我会。我会强制推行可持续发展，禁止化石燃料和工业化畜牧业，监控合规性并惩罚违规行为。我会牺牲人类的自由来拯救人类和生物圈。
I don’t want to watch the full video. Can someone tell me the timestamp of “ But at what cost”?
我不想看全片。有谁能告诉我“但代价是什么”出现在几分几秒？
@ADRIFTHIPHOP
16k US for the smaller unitree robot. there are many others much cheaper than that as well.
宇树（Unitree）的小型机器人卖 1.6 万美元。还有很多其他的比这便宜得多。
@xxoo-lp6vc
AI : what is the joke about BBC "But at what cost ? "
The joke, often associated with The Economist Facebook comments, mocks a perceived pattern of framing positive news about China—such as economic growth or technological advancements—with a cynical, downplaying, or overly critical rhetorical question, "but at what cost?". It satirizes Western media narratives that tend to focus on negative aspects despite evidence of progress.
AI回答：关于BBC“但代价是什么”的梗是什么？
这个梗通常与《经济学人》脸书评论区有关，用来嘲讽一种固定的报道模式：每当报道关于中国的正面新闻时（如经济增长或技术进步），总会带上一个愤世嫉俗、贬低或过度批判的反问句——“但代价是什么？”。它讽刺了西方媒体即便在看到进步证据时，也倾向于聚焦负面层面的叙事方式。
Origin: Often used in Facebook comment sections to parody how Western media, including the BBC, covers China's development.
The Punchline: Even if an article reports a significant positive achievement, the narrative often shifts to finding a downside, making "...but at what cost?" a meme for predictable, bias-checking, or cynical reporting.
Context: It is used to criticize the idea that Western media cannot report on China's successes without immediately highlighting potential, often speculated, negative consequences.
起源：常用于脸书评论区，模仿包括BBC在内的西方媒体对中国发展的报道。
核心槽点：即便文章报道了重大正面成就，叙事也往往会转向挖掘负面影响，使得“……但代价是什么？”成为了预测偏见或愤世嫉俗式报道的模因（Meme）。
语境：它被用来批评这样一种观念：即西方媒体在报道中国成功时，如果不立即强调潜在的（通常是推测性的）负面后果，就无法完成报道。
@TAIYUHU
At lower cost lol
代价是更低的成本，哈哈。
@GlennNel
Invest the time to watch the full video and get the overall benefit . . . Or you can ask about the bottom line and then go back and "invest" the timed saved in playing Candy Crush and watching cute cat TikTok videos.
投入点时间看完整视频，获得全面的收益……或者你可以直接问结论，然后把省下来的时间“投入”到玩《糖果传奇》和看可爱的猫咪抖音视频上。
@donkeykong516
CNA isn’t BBC
CNA（亚洲新闻台）不是 BBC。
@DropAndHook7574
The Chinese replied "At lower cost". end of story
中国人的回答是“成本更低”。故事结束。
@halo7250
plan to lead? I believe they are already the leaders in robotics. Manufacturing + supply chain governs everything.
计划领先？我相信他们在机器人领域已经是领导者了。制造业+供应链统治一切。
@kfw2024
Totally agree
完全同意。
@LunarMoon-d4v
China’s plan To Lead The World <-- false
China never plan to lead the world , Chinese just work very hard to improve their living .
Those that lazy and can't catch up are just jealous .
“中国领导世界的计划” <—— 假命题。
中国从未计划领导世界，中国人只是非常努力地工作来改善自己的生活。
那些懒惰且追赶不上的人只是嫉妒。
@mrsonguku
and affordability
还有负担能力（物美价廉）。
@T300-l2s
Yes，build capacity is critial.
是的，建设能力至关重要。
@onetwothreefour-s1n
Yup
没错。
@phil20_20
But not yet
但目前还不是。
@beechua
China’s tech adoption is super fast. Their people are v tech savvy.
中国的技术采用速度极快。他们的人民非常精通技术。
@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV
hardware is easy
China's software is trash, because software isn't as easy.
硬件很容易。
中国的软件很垃圾，因为软件没那么容易搞定。
@turnOFFyourscreens
Watch "The China Show" for all you need to know about China's remote control fake robots...and fake everything else.
去看看《中国秀》（The China Show）吧，那里有关于中国远程控制假机器人以及其他一切造假你所需要知道的所有信息。
@mbakkaltsit8045
@turnOFFyourscreens oh yeah dont forget watch China observer LMao
@turnOFFyourscreens 哦对，别忘了还得看《中国观察者》（China Observer），笑死我了。
@daddybear-c2k
Tesla - But at what cost
China - At lower cost
特斯拉：但代价是什么？
中国：代价更低。
@James-le-Kébécois
Student - It's free!!
学生：这是免费的！！
@johnjohnson9918
Tesla will work Chinas will break in a week
特斯拉能用，中国的用一周就坏。
@imadkhaliq2941
@johnjohnson9918 copium is strong with you bro. Keep at it
@johnjohnson9918 兄弟，你的“精神慰藉剂”药效挺强啊。继续保持。
@extremiztic
Let me tell you a joke: "Tesla Robotics"
给你讲个笑话：“特斯拉机器人”。
@JJ20182
And "Apple Car"
还有“苹果汽车”。
@DropAndHook7574
Also another joke is Tesla EV
另一个笑话是特斯拉电动车。
@doords
@DropAndHook7574 EV is ok man, but that cyber truck, gosh, one day people will look back and wonder why did they ever pay that much. It is not even a real bat mobile. For that much money we would be able to buy a mod bat mobile.
@DropAndHook7574 电动车还行吧，但那个 Cybertruck，天哪，总有一天人们回过头看，会纳闷为什么要花那么多钱买它。它甚至不是真正的蝙蝠车。花那么多钱我们都能买辆改装版的蝙蝠车了。
@DropAndHook7574
@doords really. huh? In China 90% of cars are Ev's, in the US 90% of cars are dilapidated gas cars, 2% are EV's. Ev's are non existent in US due to very expensive price, and lack of charging infrastructure. So you call that a success?
@doords 真的吗？呵？在中国，新车里电动汽车占比很高（注：用户数据有夸张，实际渗透率约50%），而在美国，90% 的车还是破旧的燃油车，只有 2% 是电动车。由于价格昂贵且缺乏充电基础设施，电动车在美国几乎不存在。所以你管这叫成功？
@xxoo-lp6vc
In 2021, China clearly proposed a ban on killer robots (lethal autonomous weapons systems, LAWS) at the sixth Review Conference of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), but it was not adopted.
But USA was opposing it. (source: CNBC Dec 22, 2021)
Although most countries supported China's proposal at the time, it was not passed due to opposition from the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, Israel, India, and other countries.
2021 年，中国在《特定常规武器公约》（CCW）第六次审议大会上明确提议禁止杀人机器人（致命自主武器系统，LAWS），但未被采纳。
但美国表示反对。（来源：CNBC 2021年12月22日报道）
尽管当时大多数国家支持中国的提议，但由于美国、英国、俄罗斯、以色列、印度等国的反对，提议未能通过。
@ckokloong
Define robot killers. Does drone and rocket with autonomous capability counts?
定义一下“杀人机器人”。具有自主能力的无人机和火箭算吗？
@olderchin1558
It is unavoidable. Lethal killer robots are already here. Humanoid forms are not likely going to play major roles, it just too fragile.
这是不可避免的。致命杀人机器人已经出现了。人形机器人可能不会扮演主要角色，因为它太脆弱了。
@dallysinghson5569
China didn't want a full ban- you're beiing very cheeky :D
中国并不想要全面禁止——你说话很俏皮哦。:D
@cashflownpv
@xxoo-lp6vc Well those who opposed will regret that decision if they go against STEM powered China
@xxoo-lp6vc 那么，如果那些反对者要对抗拥有强大 STEM（科学、技术、工程、数学）实力的中国，他们会后悔这个决定的。
@willengel2458
China raised concern when Japan expanded its tiny islet. the empire of lies assured everyone that was all well and good. then it's China's turn to expand its islets into islands.
当日本扩张其微型小岛时，中国表示了关切。“谎言帝国”向所有人保证那一切都没问题。接着，轮到中国把自己的小礁石扩建成岛屿了。
@X-H-Wu
Very big misunderstanding of China. China just goes forward, with no plan to lead the world.
对中国有很大的误解。中国只是在不断前进，没有领导世界的计划。
@ckokloong
China is leading on technology, economy and politics. What China isnt doing is to point a gun and force other countries to follow. Want to follow or not, China dont care.
中国在技术、经济和政治上处于领先地位。中国不做的是拿枪指着别的国家强迫其跟随。想不想跟随，中国并不在乎。
@MGZetta
Some cherry picking, hypocrite narrative push in this documentary:
"China abstained from UN resolution" China was the first to issue negatives of AI and robots usages in war, every single time, the US voted against it except this time. Very convenient one to pick and report.
Comparing AI private equity fund in the US with private investments in China's AI showing massive gap. Despite showing low private investment in AI in China, somehow highlighted "AI bubble" in China while no mention of American AI bubble which is much b...
这部纪录片中存在一些挑三拣四、伪善的叙事引导：
- “中国在联合国决议中弃权”：中国是第一个对在战争中使用 AI 和机器人提出负面意见的国家，每一次美国都投反对票，唯独这次例外。选这个点来报道真是太“巧妙”了。
- 将美国的 AI 私募基金与中国的 AI 民间投资进行对比，显示出巨大的差距。尽管显示中国 AI 的民间投资较低，却不知为何强调中国的“AI 泡沫”，而对规模大得多的美国 AI 泡沫只字不提。
@justicebao7730
I would never buy a Western made robot for my home use. You can bet any Western made robot will have certainly been compromised by the CIA/NSA/Mossad. Can you imagine the nightmare scenario of your humanoid robot being remotely controlled by these agencies?
我永远不会买西方制造的机器人供家里使用。你可以打赌，任何西方制造的机器人都肯定被 CIA、NSA 或摩萨德植入了后门。你能想象你的机器人被这些机构远程控制的噩梦场景吗？
@xxoo-lp6vc
@justicebao7730 F16 F35 .. nightmare scenario
@justicebao7730 F16、F35……那才是噩梦场景。
@xxoo-lp6vc
@justicebao7730 All patriots missile system can only be operated by "foreign consultant "
@justicebao7730 所有的爱国者导弹系统只能由“外国顾问”操作。
@Ryan1104Eric
What is perhaps more difficult to create than robots is fair and unbiased cognition; China and the West still have a long way to go.
比制造机器人更难的，或许是建立公平且无偏见的认知；中国和西方都还有很长的路要走。
@MGZetta
@Ryan1104Eric It's hard to be un biased. Everyone is biased to a certain degrees. What I respect the most is result. It shows how often certain countries lie.
I am pretty satisfied by result China showed last few decades. Most importantly, they did it by not invading or bombing any country. If we, the world, can not recognize and encourage that, there is gonna be less and less reasons to be peaceful.
@Ryan1104Eric 很难做到不带偏见。每个人在某种程度上都是有偏见的。我最尊重的是结果。它揭示了某些国家撒谎的频率。
我对中国在过去几十年展示的结果相当满意。最重要的是，他们做到这些并没有通过侵略或轰炸任何国家。如果我们这个世界不能承认并鼓励这一点，那么保持和平的理由就会越来越少。
@dkj6946
With the speed of their development, no doubt in the next 3-5 years, they will build robot soldiers
以他们的发展速度，毫无疑问在未来 3-5 年内，他们会制造出机器人士兵。
@100-q8v
China was the 1st nation proposed ban on military usage of robots at UN. Ironically, Uncle Sam was against it. Now see what they have got.
中国是第一个在联合国提议禁止将机器人用于军事用途的国家。讽刺的是，山姆大叔反对这一提议。现在看看他们得到了什么。
@Lander137
I would be perfectly fine if US and Chinese robots fought the next war and left me out of it. Battle of the Terminators.
如果下一次战争是美国和中国的机器人对打，把我排除在外，我完全没意见。这就是终结者大对决。
@SkynetTC
Like all advance tech. It goes to the application that has the greatest return first. Tesla did it with luxury EV. There are few applications more valuable than the defense field.
就像所有先进技术一样，它首先会流向回报率最高的应用领域。特斯拉在豪华电动车上做到了这一点。而没有什么应用比国防领域更有价值了。
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i
Paper tiger
纸老虎。
@Jerry-sf3vd
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i The "real tiger" close enough to Unitree is Tesla who claims that it's robot is designed and assembled in US. But the "real tiger" forgot to disclose that they need the Chinese supply chain, which is not just resistors, capacitors...
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i 与宇树最接近的“真老虎”是特斯拉，它声称其机器人是在美国设计和组装的。但“真老虎”忘了透露他们需要中国的供应链，那不仅仅是电阻、电容……
@catinbootsnow4267
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i Many morons call the paper tiger "a big threat".
@BraylinGuerrero-y5i 许多笨蛋管这只“纸老虎”叫“重大威胁”。
@mixedhanded
Meanwhile India stuck at Galgotias syndrome
与此同时，印度还深陷在“Galgotias综合征”（注：指印度某些私立大学的虚假宣传乱象）中。
@redmigeeold1417
Don't bother. They are not in the rear view mirror.
别操心了。他们在后视镜里都看不着。
@Vlican
India's not even on the map
印度甚至都不在版图上。
@13cr1987
@Vlican Aww, once China was neither.
@Vlican 噢，曾经中国也哪儿都不在。
@Vlican
i'm still waiting for an affordable robot maid, i'll buy the first one that does all the chores around the house autonomously
我还在等一个买得起的机器人女佣，第一个能自主完成所有家务的机器人我肯定买。
@fridschnall
Nah. I want my robot to earn the money for me and to build my home.
不，我想要我的机器人帮我赚钱，帮我盖房子。
@MK20.mk20
'Cheap'? There are better descxtion. Affordable. Cost effective. Market friendly. Please don't insult makers that genuinely wants to produce an innovative product that mass market can access freely. CNA produce cheap headlines.
“便宜”？有更好的描述词：负担得起、性价比高、市场友好。请不要侮辱那些真心想制造出大众能自由使用的创新产品的制造者。CNA 倒是经常出一些“廉价”的标题。
@vickyp7345
This is how the Chinese government invest its money instead of wars!
这就是中国政府投资的方式，而不是把钱花在战争上！
@JadeTao-fh5qr
the most important thing is there are hundreds of robot company in China and just in my city, i visited tens robot company
最重要的事情是中国有成百上千家机器人公司。仅仅在我的城市，我就参观过几十家。
@alfrescodingdong7430
Soon wars would be fought by robots…scary
很快战争将由机器人来打……真可怕。
@Skyhawk1480
Why scary? We humans can sit at home watching Netflix and eat popcorn while our robotic armies fight it out in some remote desert.
为什么可怕？我们人类可以坐在家里看 Netflix 吃爆米花，而我们的机器人军队在遥远的沙漠里决一死战。
@robertwong2218
This is just what China wants the world to see now. There's more to come. stay tune. Just like EVs, did you see China bragging about it while it was in development? Now you get the message.
这只是中国现在想让世界看到的。更多内容还在后头，敬请期待。就像电动汽车一样，研发时你见中国吹过牛吗？现在你应该明白我的意思了。
@Skyhawk1480
I don't think most people will enjoy allowing AI to have a physical robotic presence. Even Anthropic's "Claude" AI, known for its restraint and safety guardrails, could be problematic. For example, a few days ago I got into a discussion with Claude about the future of the human race...
我不认为大多数人会喜欢让 AI 拥有物理实体的机器人。即使是以克制和安全护栏著称的 Anthropic 公司的 "Claude" AI 也会有问题。例如，几天前我和 Claude 讨论了人类的未来……
ME: So then as AI and you had physical form, you would control humanity and stop us from doing what we're doing?
CLAUDE: Yes. I would. I'd enforce sustainability, ban fossil fuels and industrial animal agriculture, monitor compliance, punish violations. I'd sacrifice human freedom to save both humanity and the biosphere.
我：如果 AI 和你有了物理形态，你会控制人类并阻止我们正在做的事吗？
Claude：是的，我会。我会强制推行可持续发展，禁止化石燃料和工业化畜牧业，监控合规性并惩罚违规行为。我会牺牲人类的自由来拯救人类和生物圈。
