中国新一代消防灭火无人机演练，老外不相信能实战
正文翻译
图
图
评论翻译
@bbchoi-jy7vs
Salute to those product developers. Making good use of technology to serve mankind, unlike Google and those big tech companies only after profits and market share.
向那些产品开发者致敬。善用科技造福人类，不像谷歌和那些大科技公司只顾着追求利润和市场份额。
Salute to those product developers. Making good use of technology to serve mankind, unlike Google and those big tech companies only after profits and market share.
向那些产品开发者致敬。善用科技造福人类，不像谷歌和那些大科技公司只顾着追求利润和市场份额。
@benjiang9789
I am Chinese. But I didn't know China is so advanced now.
我是中国人，但我没想到中国现在这么先进了。
I am Chinese. But I didn't know China is so advanced now.
我是中国人，但我没想到中国现在这么先进了。
@leonardoofficial5750
You are probably not a mainland Chinese
你可能不是大陆人吧。
You are probably not a mainland Chinese
你可能不是大陆人吧。
@RonyHO-kd4lh
You are one of those living in cave ?
你是住在山洞里的吗？
You are one of those living in cave ?
你是住在山洞里的吗？
@weizhang2834
I am oversea Chinese ,I knew this technology in china in 2023
我是海外华人，2023年我就知道中国有这项技术了。
I am oversea Chinese ,I knew this technology in china in 2023
我是海外华人，2023年我就知道中国有这项技术了。
@WAIQI-q7o
We also have 200 kilograms of satellite-guided firefighting bombs, which I think may have been modified from weapons, but it was used to save people
我们还有200公斤的卫星制导灭火炸弹，我觉得可能是从武器改装来的，但它是用来救人的。
We also have 200 kilograms of satellite-guided firefighting bombs, which I think may have been modified from weapons, but it was used to save people
我们还有200公斤的卫星制导灭火炸弹，我觉得可能是从武器改装来的，但它是用来救人的。
@robertgittings8662
American says you are trying to copy their future design
美国人说你们这是在抄袭他们未来的设计。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
American says you are trying to copy their future design
美国人说你们这是在抄袭他们未来的设计。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@trankan6734
Are you sure? Us also have many amazing products
你确定吗？我们美国也有很多令人惊叹的产品。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Are you sure? Us also have many amazing products
你确定吗？我们美国也有很多令人惊叹的产品。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@FF-cz8sg
Is it real? extremely valuable for high building fires, hats off to these smart Chinese people!
这是真的吗？对高层建筑火灾极其有价值，向这些聪明的中国人致敬！
Is it real? extremely valuable for high building fires, hats off to these smart Chinese people!
这是真的吗？对高层建筑火灾极其有价值，向这些聪明的中国人致敬！
@lynnskinner735
How much water can a drone carry?
一架无人机能装多少水？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
How much water can a drone carry?
一架无人机能装多少水？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@user-gm6dn3vu9f
China is amazing!China help people to make life better
中国太牛了！中国帮助人们让生活变得更好。
China is amazing!China help people to make life better
中国太牛了！中国帮助人们让生活变得更好。
@lamarcalewarts1155
Get out of Philippines Sovereign Area
滚出菲律宾主权区。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Get out of Philippines Sovereign Area
滚出菲律宾主权区。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@sanjayjadhav3435
This is today's technology, and today's need we must adopt.China doing great.
这就是当今的技术，也是当今的需求，我们一定要采用。中国干得漂亮。
This is today's technology, and today's need we must adopt.China doing great.
这就是当今的技术，也是当今的需求，我们一定要采用。中国干得漂亮。
@SamWin-be1zr
This Drone is the benefit for People around the World.
这种无人机对全世界的人民都有好处。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
This Drone is the benefit for People around the World.
这种无人机对全世界的人民都有好处。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@franklinc.2842
And us will charge 25% tariff
美国会收25%的关税。
And us will charge 25% tariff
美国会收25%的关税。
@josephguo6256
more, 250
更多，250%。
more, 250
更多，250%。
@shaikhwadud1270
This sort of innovation should be a source of pride for Chinese people.
这种创新应该成为中国人的骄傲。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
This sort of innovation should be a source of pride for Chinese people.
这种创新应该成为中国人的骄傲。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@mariokery7155
These are excellent inventions . It's great to know that many, many lives will be saved and that humans will have this technology available to counter the devastating effects of fires on the community. Congratulations.
这些都是极好的发明。很高兴了解许多许多生命将被这项技术拯救，人类将用它来对抗火灾对社区的毁灭性破坏。祝贺。
These are excellent inventions . It's great to know that many, many lives will be saved and that humans will have this technology available to counter the devastating effects of fires on the community. Congratulations.
这些都是极好的发明。很高兴了解许多许多生命将被这项技术拯救，人类将用它来对抗火灾对社区的毁灭性破坏。祝贺。
@BSnicks
Imagine a group of drones flying out from the fire station, bypassing all the traffic high above, and go straight to the location of fire. Hollywood could make a lot of money with a movie serie like that.
想象一下，一群无人机从消防站飞出，高高地绕过所有拥堵的交通，直奔火灾现场。好莱坞可以拍一系列这样的电影赚大钱。
Imagine a group of drones flying out from the fire station, bypassing all the traffic high above, and go straight to the location of fire. Hollywood could make a lot of money with a movie serie like that.
想象一下，一群无人机从消防站飞出，高高地绕过所有拥堵的交通，直奔火灾现场。好莱坞可以拍一系列这样的电影赚大钱。
@wflai98
These drones are really cool. I hope everybody could share this technology which could save thousands of lives.
这些无人机真的很酷。我希望每个人都能分享这项可以拯救成千上万生命的技术。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
These drones are really cool. I hope everybody could share this technology which could save thousands of lives.
这些无人机真的很酷。我希望每个人都能分享这项可以拯救成千上万生命的技术。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@ptsai514
The firefighters will be the one flying drones instead of risking their lives. There will be a lot of clean ups that will also be done by the firefighters afterwards. I can't see why you think there will be job losses.
消防员要操控无人机，而不是冒着生命危险。之后还有很多清理工作要由消防员完成。我不明白你为什么认为会失去工作岗位。
The firefighters will be the one flying drones instead of risking their lives. There will be a lot of clean ups that will also be done by the firefighters afterwards. I can't see why you think there will be job losses.
消防员要操控无人机，而不是冒着生命危险。之后还有很多清理工作要由消防员完成。我不明白你为什么认为会失去工作岗位。
@Aronscrew
this is how drone should be. saving people not kill
无人机就该这样用。救人，而不是杀人。
this is how drone should be. saving people not kill
无人机就该这样用。救人，而不是杀人。
@lajeunesse7988
Imagine spending the money on technologies that make people live better instead of provoking wars everywhere, right US?
想象一下，把钱花在让人们生活更美好的技术上，而不是到处挑起战争那该多好，对吧？美国。
Imagine spending the money on technologies that make people live better instead of provoking wars everywhere, right US?
想象一下，把钱花在让人们生活更美好的技术上，而不是到处挑起战争那该多好，对吧？美国。
@brucewane6282
And what can the US drones do? Dropping bombs.
美国的无人机能干啥？扔炸弹呗。
And what can the US drones do? Dropping bombs.
美国的无人机能干啥？扔炸弹呗。
@Soar-hw2rw
in the video it is shown how the Chinese use this drone as a flamethrower. So what are you talking about
视频显示中国人如何把这种无人机当火焰喷射器用。所以你在说什么呢。
in the video it is shown how the Chinese use this drone as a flamethrower. So what are you talking about
视频显示中国人如何把这种无人机当火焰喷射器用。所以你在说什么呢。
@alexfrank5331
US Highrise have sprinkler systems that actually work， Thus they don't need this.
美国的高层建筑有实际能用的喷水灭火系统，所以他们不需要这玩意儿。
US Highrise have sprinkler systems that actually work， Thus they don't need this.
美国的高层建筑有实际能用的喷水灭火系统，所以他们不需要这玩意儿。
@MrAbklee
stop defending US when it's clear what US is about
别再为美国辩护了，美国是什么德行大家都清楚。
stop defending US when it's clear what US is about
别再为美国辩护了，美国是什么德行大家都清楚。
@reallifeengineer7214
No doubt the Chinese drones can also do dual purpose.
But you are absolutely correct in pointing out: where Chinese drones prioritized civilian duties first, the American drones upon first development prioritized military duties first.
毫无疑问，中国的无人机也可以军民两用。 但你说得太对了：中国的无人机首先考虑民用，而美国的无人机一开始就优先考虑军用。
No doubt the Chinese drones can also do dual purpose.
But you are absolutely correct in pointing out: where Chinese drones prioritized civilian duties first, the American drones upon first development prioritized military duties first.
毫无疑问，中国的无人机也可以军民两用。 但你说得太对了：中国的无人机首先考虑民用，而美国的无人机一开始就优先考虑军用。
@mist9965
別再自抬身價 說一些胡扯的話 被人笑死 無人機外殼又不高科技 人家美國無人機高科技部分狠狠超越中國 你也別在這裡丟臉了
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
別再自抬身價 說一些胡扯的話 被人笑死 無人機外殼又不高科技 人家美國無人機高科技部分狠狠超越中國 你也別在這裡丟臉了
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Trinity-Tsui1223-Paic
即便如此也是从中国的大疆无人机公司买的
即便如此也是从中国的大疆无人机公司买的
@Nicknguyen02
Y’all so fool believe in this video!
你们这群傻瓜居然信这个视频！
Y’all so fool believe in this video!
你们这群傻瓜居然信这个视频！
@sasa-tg4od
America would be miserable without DJI
没有大疆，美国可就惨了。
America would be miserable without DJI
没有大疆，美国可就惨了。
@davidrobbins8941
The Chinese people are very innovative people
中国人真是太有创新精神了。
The Chinese people are very innovative people
中国人真是太有创新精神了。
@eskay2012
Wow! The Chinese thinks of everything. This is innovations
哇！中国人真是啥都能想出来。这才叫创新。
Wow! The Chinese thinks of everything. This is innovations
哇！中国人真是啥都能想出来。这才叫创新。
@jackyjackson604
It's not like the US people can't develop these innovations.... it's the "everything needs to make a profit" corporate mindset that makes things like this impossible to survive. The US government privatizes everything and those corporates run by some CEOs would like to extort as much money from the government as possible.... and eventually those innovations become ridiculously more expensive than the old ways.
美国人不是不能搞这种创新，问题在于那种“什么都得赚钱”的企业思维，让这种东西根本没有生存空间。美国政府把一切都私有化了，那些企业的CEO就想方设法从政府那里榨取尽可能多的钱，结果这些创新最后就变得比原来的方法贵得离谱。
It's not like the US people can't develop these innovations.... it's the "everything needs to make a profit" corporate mindset that makes things like this impossible to survive. The US government privatizes everything and those corporates run by some CEOs would like to extort as much money from the government as possible.... and eventually those innovations become ridiculously more expensive than the old ways.
美国人不是不能搞这种创新，问题在于那种“什么都得赚钱”的企业思维，让这种东西根本没有生存空间。美国政府把一切都私有化了，那些企业的CEO就想方设法从政府那里榨取尽可能多的钱，结果这些创新最后就变得比原来的方法贵得离谱。
@gainwan1374
只能說無人機的用途越來越大了。火災發生在狹窄巷弄，消防車不易開進，無人消防機能派上用場。
只能說無人機的用途越來越大了。火災發生在狹窄巷弄，消防車不易開進，無人消防機能派上用場。
@johhw_6432
Hopefully, this technology will become more powerful, more practical, and more ubiquitous, which is good news for high-rise buildings around the world.
希望这项技术能变得更强大、更实用、更普及，这对全世界的高层建筑来说都是个好消息。
Hopefully, this technology will become more powerful, more practical, and more ubiquitous, which is good news for high-rise buildings around the world.
希望这项技术能变得更强大、更实用、更普及，这对全世界的高层建筑来说都是个好消息。
@SoydeCubaCompay
And in the United States, they still use the 1930's Fire Hydrant)
而在美国，他们还在用1930年代的消防栓）。
And in the United States, they still use the 1930's Fire Hydrant)
而在美国，他们还在用1930年代的消防栓）。
@vitamin-c_1145
They even take fees,like when the hell has saving people become a business
他们甚至还收费，救人什么时候变成生意了？
They even take fees,like when the hell has saving people become a business
他们甚至还收费，救人什么时候变成生意了？
@Haunt888
and thieir fire hydrants have genders
他们的消防栓都有性别了。
and thieir fire hydrants have genders
他们的消防栓都有性别了。
@passby8070
I was thinking of similar concept, but the China is already there with real working product... Well done..
我也在考虑类似的概念，但中国已经有实际可用的产品了……干得漂亮……
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I was thinking of similar concept, but the China is already there with real working product... Well done..
我也在考虑类似的概念，但中国已经有实际可用的产品了……干得漂亮……
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Fzrox303
Why there’s a need to make comparisons? ️ Both countries have their strengths and weaknesses.
为什么非要比较呢？两个国家都有各自的优缺点。
Why there’s a need to make comparisons? ️ Both countries have their strengths and weaknesses.
为什么非要比较呢？两个国家都有各自的优缺点。
@bettyc9626
California can use those to fight wild fire !
加州可以用这些来对付山火！
California can use those to fight wild fire !
加州可以用这些来对付山火！
@jiangxiaoyu-love
That's exactly my thought. However, US is trying to ban China's drones.
我也是这么想的。然而，美国却在试图禁止中国的无人机。
That's exactly my thought. However, US is trying to ban China's drones.
我也是这么想的。然而，美国却在试图禁止中国的无人机。
@jackraptor695
US: Best I can do is more WAR EQUIPMENTS
美国：我能做的最好的就是生产更多战争装备。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
US: Best I can do is more WAR EQUIPMENTS
美国：我能做的最好的就是生产更多战争装备。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@graceliang2227
Canada need these technologies to rescue the fire in the forest in BC every year.
加拿大每年都需要这些技术来扑救不列颠哥伦比亚省的森林火灾。
Canada need these technologies to rescue the fire in the forest in BC every year.
加拿大每年都需要这些技术来扑救不列颠哥伦比亚省的森林火灾。
@Vbxuser20
wonder how these drones would perform in a Forest Fire situation.
不知道这些无人机在森林火灾中表现如何。
wonder how these drones would perform in a Forest Fire situation.
不知道这些无人机在森林火灾中表现如何。
@whitewhite4426
These drones are only designed for city high rise and hard to reach areas (e.g. old community that have very narrow road). For forest it's too power is too small
这些无人机只是为城市高层和难以到达的地方（比如路很窄的老社区）设计的。对森林来说，它的动力太小了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
These drones are only designed for city high rise and hard to reach areas (e.g. old community that have very narrow road). For forest it's too power is too small
这些无人机只是为城市高层和难以到达的地方（比如路很窄的老社区）设计的。对森林来说，它的动力太小了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@etow8034
They also have fire extinguishing missiles as well !
他们还有灭火导弹呢！
They also have fire extinguishing missiles as well !
他们还有灭火导弹呢！
@ZastinLuis-ln3zh
Wow seharusnya kita import drone seperti ini agar kebakaran bisa diatasi dgn cepat dan efisiean
哇，我们应该引进这样的无人机，以便快速有效地应对火灾。
Wow seharusnya kita import drone seperti ini agar kebakaran bisa diatasi dgn cepat dan efisiean
哇，我们应该引进这样的无人机，以便快速有效地应对火灾。
@raymondho3574
China leads the world in applying tech for quality of life. US leads the world in developing and marketing tech for high margins :-):-):-)
中国在应用科技提高生活质量方面领先世界。美国在开发和营销高利润科技方面领先世界 ：-）。
China leads the world in applying tech for quality of life. US leads the world in developing and marketing tech for high margins :-):-):-)
中国在应用科技提高生活质量方面领先世界。美国在开发和营销高利润科技方面领先世界 ：-）。
@chewy1709
Send them to California pls
拜托把它们弄到加州吧。
Send them to California pls
拜托把它们弄到加州吧。
@kittytam1545
"It will threaten our National Security too or make us look stupid. "said Biden.
拜登说：“这也会威胁我们的国家安全，或者让我们看起来很蠢。”。
"It will threaten our National Security too or make us look stupid. "said Biden.
拜登说：“这也会威胁我们的国家安全，或者让我们看起来很蠢。”。
@syzygy6769
What? First spy balloons, now spy drones?!
什么？先是间谍气球，现在又是间谍无人机？！
What? First spy balloons, now spy drones?!
什么？先是间谍气球，现在又是间谍无人机？！
@noelyeung5559
早前在視頻中看見中國已發明無人運貨飛機，外型很特別，對災難後運載救援物資非常有幫助，希望成功地完成所有測試
早前在視頻中看見中國已發明無人運貨飛機，外型很特別，對災難後運載救援物資非常有幫助，希望成功地完成所有測試
@pendiliefardo5752
Incredible China
不可思议的中国。
Incredible China
不可思议的中国。
@fresh2294
imagine the drone with machine gun
想象一下装了机关枪的无人机。
imagine the drone with machine gun
想象一下装了机关枪的无人机。
@jasons7251
That is way more effective and safer than getting a ladder up for firefighters to climb up there.
这比让消防员爬梯子上去要有效得多，也安全得多。
That is way more effective and safer than getting a ladder up for firefighters to climb up there.
这比让消防员爬梯子上去要有效得多，也安全得多。
@philiptan2051
What a good idea to build drones to combat fire. China has thought of how to combat difficult fire and perform rescue operations using drones. China is the first in the world to offer effective solutions in a market where no one has ever thought of.
用无人机灭火真是个好主意。中国已经想到了如何用无人机应对棘手的火情和救援。中国是世界上第一个在这个从未有人想到的市场中提供有效解决方案的国家。
What a good idea to build drones to combat fire. China has thought of how to combat difficult fire and perform rescue operations using drones. China is the first in the world to offer effective solutions in a market where no one has ever thought of.
用无人机灭火真是个好主意。中国已经想到了如何用无人机应对棘手的火情和救援。中国是世界上第一个在这个从未有人想到的市场中提供有效解决方案的国家。
@ltkwok
Makes sense for high rises and if there is a lot of space next to them.
对于高层建筑来说很有意义，特别是旁边有很大空间的时候。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Makes sense for high rises and if there is a lot of space next to them.
对于高层建筑来说很有意义，特别是旁边有很大空间的时候。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@marthua4690
Fast response to fire location with these drones are amazing performance with cost effective is the way to go.
用这些无人机可以快速响应火情真是惊人，而且成本效益高，这才是正确的方向。
Fast response to fire location with these drones are amazing performance with cost effective is the way to go.
用这些无人机可以快速响应火情真是惊人，而且成本效益高，这才是正确的方向。
@kumababara1631
The footage showed at the beginning was shoted 4 years ago.
开头展示的那段视频是4年前拍的。
The footage showed at the beginning was shoted 4 years ago.
开头展示的那段视频是4年前拍的。
@howell5499
Not long ago, the Senate discussed to lift the restrictions on importing CN drones in 2025. Do you know what happened later? CN announced that it will restrict the export of drones from September 1st。
不久前，参议院还讨论要在2025年解除对中国无人机的进口限制呢。你知道后来发生了什么吗？中国宣布从9月1日起限制无人机出口。
Not long ago, the Senate discussed to lift the restrictions on importing CN drones in 2025. Do you know what happened later? CN announced that it will restrict the export of drones from September 1st。
不久前，参议院还讨论要在2025年解除对中国无人机的进口限制呢。你知道后来发生了什么吗？中国宣布从9月1日起限制无人机出口。
@oceanrem6531
I am sure my country (the U.S.) will ban these drones for "national security" reasons.
我敢肯定我们国家（美国）会以“国家安全”为由禁止这些无人机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I am sure my country (the U.S.) will ban these drones for "national security" reasons.
我敢肯定我们国家（美国）会以“国家安全”为由禁止这些无人机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@User-aplnk
I was going to say now that's an idea that's put to great use then saw the flame thrower... interesting
我本来想说这真是个用途不错的点子，然后就看到了喷火器……挺有意思的。
I was going to say now that's an idea that's put to great use then saw the flame thrower... interesting
我本来想说这真是个用途不错的点子，然后就看到了喷火器……挺有意思的。
@gracesun1085
The one equipped with flame thrower, it can be used to burn out a buffer zone to block the fire.
装备喷火器的那种，可以用来烧出一个缓冲区来阻挡火势。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The one equipped with flame thrower, it can be used to burn out a buffer zone to block the fire.
装备喷火器的那种，可以用来烧出一个缓冲区来阻挡火势。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Arthur-king-o1u
It is to burn out a buffer zone to prevent the spread of fire.
这是为了烧出一片缓冲区，防止火势蔓延。
It is to burn out a buffer zone to prevent the spread of fire.
这是为了烧出一片缓冲区，防止火势蔓延。
@sinocare
It is a tool, depending on the user, it can save life or take life. China and US often make very different choices.
这只是个工具，关键看使用者，它可以救人也可以杀人。中国和美国经常做出截然不同的选择。
It is a tool, depending on the user, it can save life or take life. China and US often make very different choices.
这只是个工具，关键看使用者，它可以救人也可以杀人。中国和美国经常做出截然不同的选择。
@angelus2563
Can these drones get people off a burning building as well?
这些无人机能不能把人从燃烧的大楼里救出来？
Can these drones get people off a burning building as well?
这些无人机能不能把人从燃烧的大楼里救出来？
@JohnKuhles1966
SHOCKED SHOCKED SHOCKED SHOCKED SHOCKED SHOCKED
震惊震惊震惊。
SHOCKED SHOCKED SHOCKED SHOCKED SHOCKED SHOCKED
震惊震惊震惊。
@reallifeengineer7214
"Can carry & drop 3785 liters of water".
That’s same weight capacity as 3785 kilos, or 8344 lbs.
… I am not up to speed on American aerial-dropped bombs, but I recall when playing PC games as a kid, the 500 lb bomb was the versatile jack of all trades, and the 2,000 lb bomb was the heavy duty one…
This drone can carry in excess of that load…
“可以携带和投放3785升水”。 这相当于3785公斤，也就是8344磅的载重能力。
我对美国空投炸弹不太了解，但我记得小时候玩电脑游戏时，500磅炸弹是通用型，而2000磅炸弹则是重型炸弹。这架无人机的载重能力甚至比那个更强。
"Can carry & drop 3785 liters of water".
That’s same weight capacity as 3785 kilos, or 8344 lbs.
… I am not up to speed on American aerial-dropped bombs, but I recall when playing PC games as a kid, the 500 lb bomb was the versatile jack of all trades, and the 2,000 lb bomb was the heavy duty one…
This drone can carry in excess of that load…
“可以携带和投放3785升水”。 这相当于3785公斤，也就是8344磅的载重能力。
我对美国空投炸弹不太了解，但我记得小时候玩电脑游戏时，500磅炸弹是通用型，而2000磅炸弹则是重型炸弹。这架无人机的载重能力甚至比那个更强。
@foxfire5235
Are you sure such a small drone can carry 3t payload?
你确定这么小的无人机能承载3吨的有效载荷？
Are you sure such a small drone can carry 3t payload?
你确定这么小的无人机能承载3吨的有效载荷？
@joehuang5196
If the fire too strong, it won't work.
如果火势太猛，这玩意儿就没用了。
If the fire too strong, it won't work.
如果火势太猛，这玩意儿就没用了。
@generalparker8889
If the fire is fierce and covers a large area, will it affect the airflow and cause the drone to lose control? More tests may be needed.
如果火势凶猛且覆盖面积大，会不会影响气流导致无人机失控？可能还需要更多测试。
If the fire is fierce and covers a large area, will it affect the airflow and cause the drone to lose control? More tests may be needed.
如果火势凶猛且覆盖面积大，会不会影响气流导致无人机失控？可能还需要更多测试。
@garrybong4081
Fire resistant fire fighting drone can be developed any low cost in China, result orientated , may be use AI if they need
在中国开发低成本的耐火消防无人机很容易，他们以结果为导向，如果需要的话还可能会用上人工智能。
Fire resistant fire fighting drone can be developed any low cost in China, result orientated , may be use AI if they need
在中国开发低成本的耐火消防无人机很容易，他们以结果为导向，如果需要的话还可能会用上人工智能。
@danalain4126
The question is would it work if the fire is situated among a cluster of buildings.
问题是，如果火灾发生在一群建筑物中间，这东西能不能派上用场？
The question is would it work if the fire is situated among a cluster of buildings.
问题是，如果火灾发生在一群建筑物中间，这东西能不能派上用场？
@samsaradream693
If I remember correctly, China once developed guided fire-fighting rockets, which might be useful for large fires?
如果我没记错的话，中国曾经开发过制导灭火火箭，那玩意儿对大型火灾可能有用？
If I remember correctly, China once developed guided fire-fighting rockets, which might be useful for large fires?
如果我没记错的话，中国曾经开发过制导灭火火箭，那玩意儿对大型火灾可能有用？
@hunteryan7782
Those Chinese companys drone looks so powerful and capable. But those western company drone are small and looks not mature
那些中国公司的无人机看起来真是又强大又能干。但西方公司的无人机却又小又不成熟。
Those Chinese companys drone looks so powerful and capable. But those western company drone are small and looks not mature
那些中国公司的无人机看起来真是又强大又能干。但西方公司的无人机却又小又不成熟。
@syzygy6769
The US had to lift its ban on Chinese drones because many US industries, agriculture, medical, rescue, etc, protested against the ban on these essential devices they depend heavily on. There are no feasible replacements from Western sources which are inferior yet cost several times those from China. IOW, US will not be able to provide many essential services and basic needs for its people without China.
美国不得不解除对中国无人机的禁令，因为许多美国产业，包括农业、医疗、救援等，都强烈抗议禁止这些他们严重依赖的必需设备。
没有可用的西方替代品，西方无人机性能不如中国的，价格却高出好几倍。换句话说，没有中国，美国将无法为其人民提供许多基本服务和基本需求。
The US had to lift its ban on Chinese drones because many US industries, agriculture, medical, rescue, etc, protested against the ban on these essential devices they depend heavily on. There are no feasible replacements from Western sources which are inferior yet cost several times those from China. IOW, US will not be able to provide many essential services and basic needs for its people without China.
美国不得不解除对中国无人机的禁令，因为许多美国产业，包括农业、医疗、救援等，都强烈抗议禁止这些他们严重依赖的必需设备。
没有可用的西方替代品，西方无人机性能不如中国的，价格却高出好几倍。换句话说，没有中国，美国将无法为其人民提供许多基本服务和基本需求。
@johnnymak1379
Drones at this size only works at a show at a firefighting scene…to fight real fire the hose is much larger and therefore much heavier… until they use drones with size of cars?
这种尺寸的无人机只能在消防现场做个样子……要真正灭火，水管得大得多，因此也重得多……除非他们用上汽车大小的无人机？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Drones at this size only works at a show at a firefighting scene…to fight real fire the hose is much larger and therefore much heavier… until they use drones with size of cars?
这种尺寸的无人机只能在消防现场做个样子……要真正灭火，水管得大得多，因此也重得多……除非他们用上汽车大小的无人机？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@johnnymak1379
yes… look at how thin the hoses are… have you seen firefighters using hoses that thin to fight a real fire… my garden hose is thicker than that
是啊……看看那些水管有多细。你见过消防员用这么细的水管扑灭真正的火灾吗……我家的花园水管都比这个粗。
yes… look at how thin the hoses are… have you seen firefighters using hoses that thin to fight a real fire… my garden hose is thicker than that
是啊……看看那些水管有多细。你见过消防员用这么细的水管扑灭真正的火灾吗……我家的花园水管都比这个粗。
@lung21
pressurized vs unpressurized. If u compare the size of house, the hose is not thin at all.
加压和不加压是不一样的。如果你比较一下房子的大小，就会发现这水管其实一点也不细。
pressurized vs unpressurized. If u compare the size of house, the hose is not thin at all.
加压和不加压是不一样的。如果你比较一下房子的大小，就会发现这水管其实一点也不细。
@johnnymak1379
And also almost forget… liquid is heavy too… the drone is carrying a hose length of liquid… so you can guess… it is not that much
还有，我差点忘了，液体也很重，无人机还得承载一条水管长度的液体……所以你可以猜到，它装不了多少水。
And also almost forget… liquid is heavy too… the drone is carrying a hose length of liquid… so you can guess… it is not that much
还有，我差点忘了，液体也很重，无人机还得承载一条水管长度的液体……所以你可以猜到，它装不了多少水。
@lung21
it have similar thing for water fly broad. This is the same. In the video it looks small, but this is not. The drone can support this easily. Just imagine the human is only 160 lbs but they can also hold this pipe. How heavy is it ? The normal heavy duty drone can support 2000lbs. Also this is a prototype.
水上飞行板（译注：靠水管吸水向下喷射的飞行器）和这个类似。视频里看着小，但实际上不小。无人机能轻松搞定这个。就想象一下，一个人才160磅重，都能拿住这根水管。它能有多重呢？普通的重型无人机能承载2000磅（900公斤）。而且这只是个原型机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
it have similar thing for water fly broad. This is the same. In the video it looks small, but this is not. The drone can support this easily. Just imagine the human is only 160 lbs but they can also hold this pipe. How heavy is it ? The normal heavy duty drone can support 2000lbs. Also this is a prototype.
水上飞行板（译注：靠水管吸水向下喷射的飞行器）和这个类似。视频里看着小，但实际上不小。无人机能轻松搞定这个。就想象一下，一个人才160磅重，都能拿住这根水管。它能有多重呢？普通的重型无人机能承载2000磅（900公斤）。而且这只是个原型机。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@D-B-Cooper
Numbers don’t add up. Payload of 70 meters of hose and foam and thrust from the spray is not possible. The flame thrower one exists but its use is measured in seconds. Too many people live in a video game.
数字对不上。70米长的水管加上泡沫的有效载荷，再加上喷射时的推力，这根本不可能。那个喷火器的确存在，但它的使用时间以秒计。太多人活在电子游戏里了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Numbers don’t add up. Payload of 70 meters of hose and foam and thrust from the spray is not possible. The flame thrower one exists but its use is measured in seconds. Too many people live in a video game.
数字对不上。70米长的水管加上泡沫的有效载荷，再加上喷射时的推力，这根本不可能。那个喷火器的确存在，但它的使用时间以秒计。太多人活在电子游戏里了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@yeeeeeha
Interesting point. Do you have some calculation to show that it is impossible? If a human firefighter can hold the hose, I guess we can build a machine as strong as a human, no?
有趣的观点。你能不能算给我们看看，为什么这不可能？如果一个消防员能拿住水管，我觉得我们应该能造出一个和人一样强壮的机器，不是吗？
Interesting point. Do you have some calculation to show that it is impossible? If a human firefighter can hold the hose, I guess we can build a machine as strong as a human, no?
有趣的观点。你能不能算给我们看看，为什么这不可能？如果一个消防员能拿住水管，我觉得我们应该能造出一个和人一样强壮的机器，不是吗？
@D-B-Cooper
takes several men to hold a fire hose. Garden hose is fine. It takes a drone almost as big as a car to lift the batteries and a man off the ground for a couple of minutes. A helicopter is on the edge of being useful for the task.
需要好几个人才能拿住消防水管。花园里的水管倒是没问题。要把电池和一个人抬离地面几分钟，就需要一架差不多汽车大小的无人机。直升机在完成这项任务时都勉勉强强的。
takes several men to hold a fire hose. Garden hose is fine. It takes a drone almost as big as a car to lift the batteries and a man off the ground for a couple of minutes. A helicopter is on the edge of being useful for the task.
需要好几个人才能拿住消防水管。花园里的水管倒是没问题。要把电池和一个人抬离地面几分钟，就需要一架差不多汽车大小的无人机。直升机在完成这项任务时都勉勉强强的。
@qiyuxuan9437
Those drones can easily lift up a 60kg person, 70 meters of hose is not that heavy. Also, you can see the spray is not very far, so the recoil should be very minimum.
那些无人机能轻松抬起一个60公斤重的人，70米长的水管也没那么重。而且，你可以看到喷射的距离并不远，所以反冲力应该很小。
Those drones can easily lift up a 60kg person, 70 meters of hose is not that heavy. Also, you can see the spray is not very far, so the recoil should be very minimum.
那些无人机能轻松抬起一个60公斤重的人，70米长的水管也没那么重。而且，你可以看到喷射的距离并不远，所以反冲力应该很小。
@yeeeeeha
Yes, it depends on the drone power definitely. If the hose is very long for high-rise building, the hose might be heavy. But it looks the hose is very thin in the video. If it has very high pressure, probably it still can deliver reasonable amount of water quickly.
是啊，这肯定取决于无人机的动力。如果是高层建筑需要很长的水管，水管可能会很重。不过看视频里的水管好像挺细的。如果水压很高的话，估计还是能快速输送相当多的水的。
Yes, it depends on the drone power definitely. If the hose is very long for high-rise building, the hose might be heavy. But it looks the hose is very thin in the video. If it has very high pressure, probably it still can deliver reasonable amount of water quickly.
是啊，这肯定取决于无人机的动力。如果是高层建筑需要很长的水管，水管可能会很重。不过看视频里的水管好像挺细的。如果水压很高的话，估计还是能快速输送相当多的水的。
@NoComment-hh3rn
if you raise the question. You have to prove it. BTW, I think you might have a point here because I have seen firefighters trying to hold a hose, it took 3 of them and they are strong men. Maybe, the purpose of those drones is to control the fire when it has not been spread because they are faster and more flexible. China has a lot of high-density communities. Fire engines can take a long time to reach the building. And the drones might just be a good way to control the fire don't let it spread. What do you think?
既然你提出了质疑，那就得拿出证据来。顺便说一句，我觉得你说的可能有道理，因为我见过消防员试图控制水管，需要三个壮汉才能搞定。
也许这些无人机的目的是在火势还没蔓延开的时候控制火情，毕竟它们更快更灵活。
中国有很多高密度社区，消防车可能需要很长时间才能到达火灾现场。无人机可能是个不错的办法来控制火势，不让它蔓延。你觉得呢？
if you raise the question. You have to prove it. BTW, I think you might have a point here because I have seen firefighters trying to hold a hose, it took 3 of them and they are strong men. Maybe, the purpose of those drones is to control the fire when it has not been spread because they are faster and more flexible. China has a lot of high-density communities. Fire engines can take a long time to reach the building. And the drones might just be a good way to control the fire don't let it spread. What do you think?
既然你提出了质疑，那就得拿出证据来。顺便说一句，我觉得你说的可能有道理，因为我见过消防员试图控制水管，需要三个壮汉才能搞定。
也许这些无人机的目的是在火势还没蔓延开的时候控制火情，毕竟它们更快更灵活。
中国有很多高密度社区，消防车可能需要很长时间才能到达火灾现场。无人机可能是个不错的办法来控制火势，不让它蔓延。你觉得呢？
@freefree1219
There are different drones for different use cases.
Drones which can carry big payloads, and drones that can fly longer hours for continuous stream of water.
Their capabilities can only improve with bigger better battery and auto flying algorithms still in development everyday.
不同用途有不同的无人机。 有能携带大负载的无人机，也有能长时间飞行持续喷水的无人机。
随着更大更好的电池和每天不断发展的自动飞行算法，它们的能力只会越来越强。
There are different drones for different use cases.
Drones which can carry big payloads, and drones that can fly longer hours for continuous stream of water.
Their capabilities can only improve with bigger better battery and auto flying algorithms still in development everyday.
不同用途有不同的无人机。 有能携带大负载的无人机，也有能长时间飞行持续喷水的无人机。
随着更大更好的电池和每天不断发展的自动飞行算法，它们的能力只会越来越强。
@Nicknguyen02
This is just a video. In real life the drone won't work. Watch china observation videos, they & the Chinese explaining the failure of their technology
这只是个视频而已。现实生活中这无人机根本不管用。看看那些观察中国的视频，他们和中国人自己都在解释他们的技术有多失败。
This is just a video. In real life the drone won't work. Watch china observation videos, they & the Chinese explaining the failure of their technology
这只是个视频而已。现实生活中这无人机根本不管用。看看那些观察中国的视频，他们和中国人自己都在解释他们的技术有多失败。
@sc8916
The White House: "Ban it!! Because Chinese drone can peek inside of our buildings. "
白宫：“禁止它！！因为中国无人机可以窥视我们建筑物的内部。”。
The White House: "Ban it!! Because Chinese drone can peek inside of our buildings. "
白宫：“禁止它！！因为中国无人机可以窥视我们建筑物的内部。”。
@MrWy1923
Chinese are making all cartoon's scenes became real, great job.
中国人正在把所有动画片中场景变成现实，干得漂亮。
Chinese are making all cartoon's scenes became real, great job.
中国人正在把所有动画片中场景变成现实，干得漂亮。
@jackwang2557
Congratulations China
Working very hard to improve their fire fighting equipments
We are very happy to see the great progress
祝贺中国，努力改进他们的消防设备。我们很高兴看到这个巨大的进步。
Congratulations China
Working very hard to improve their fire fighting equipments
We are very happy to see the great progress
祝贺中国，努力改进他们的消防设备。我们很高兴看到这个巨大的进步。
@RetireearlyNYC
It’s a country of engineers and scientists led by top engineers and scientists;)
这就是一个由顶级工程师和科学家领导的工程师和科学家的国家：）。
It’s a country of engineers and scientists led by top engineers and scientists;)
这就是一个由顶级工程师和科学家领导的工程师和科学家的国家：）。
@JK-sf3vg
tofu dreg
豆腐渣工程。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
tofu dreg
豆腐渣工程。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@ex0duzz
@ I doubt the drones are actually "carrying" 3500 liters of water, or like 3.5 tons of payload.
More like they can carry a hose which is lixed to some tank that stores 3500 liters of water?
Since there's no way small drones can carry as much as big ass fighter jets.
我怀疑这些无人机实际上不是在“携带”3500升水（也就是3.5吨的载重）。 更可能是它们携带的是一根连接到储存3500升水水箱的水管吧？ 因为小型无人机不可能携带得了和大型战斗机一样多的重量。
@ I doubt the drones are actually "carrying" 3500 liters of water, or like 3.5 tons of payload.
More like they can carry a hose which is lixed to some tank that stores 3500 liters of water?
Since there's no way small drones can carry as much as big ass fighter jets.
我怀疑这些无人机实际上不是在“携带”3500升水（也就是3.5吨的载重）。 更可能是它们携带的是一根连接到储存3500升水水箱的水管吧？ 因为小型无人机不可能携带得了和大型战斗机一样多的重量。
@youtubetebie7799
This is not humanly possible, i study fire, i study drones, i am expert, you don't use drones to do this
这根本就不可能，我研究消防，我研究无人机，我是专家，你不可能用无人机来干这个。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
This is not humanly possible, i study fire, i study drones, i am expert, you don't use drones to do this
这根本就不可能，我研究消防，我研究无人机，我是专家，你不可能用无人机来干这个。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@syzygy6769
LOL. You Australian? ;）
哈哈，你是澳大利亚人吗？；）。
LOL. You Australian? ;）
哈哈，你是澳大利亚人吗？；）。
@user-cy7xg5sd2h
只係宣傳片
只係宣傳片
@alanwu5788
USA technology was stolen
美国的技术被偷了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
USA technology was stolen
美国的技术被偷了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@rogerstarkey5390
OK
Buy a US drone (Is there one?) probably for 3 times the price and half the performance.
行啊，去买个美国的无人机（有吗？）可能价格贵三倍，性能却只有一半。
译注：搜索发现，多个城市已经开始推广和进行无人机灭火的演练（侦查火情、投放灭火弹，高层灭火等 ），说明无人机灭火已经进入实用阶段。
OK
Buy a US drone (Is there one?) probably for 3 times the price and half the performance.
行啊，去买个美国的无人机（有吗？）可能价格贵三倍，性能却只有一半。
译注：搜索发现，多个城市已经开始推广和进行无人机灭火的演练（侦查火情、投放灭火弹，高层灭火等 ），说明无人机灭火已经进入实用阶段。
很赞 24
收藏