中国网民嘲讽特朗普关税
正文翻译
中国网民嘲讽特朗普关税
评论翻译
@jackrice2770
I'll bet that someone could convince Trump that he has cloth that only smart people can see and convinces him to have a suit made of this invisible-visible clothing. Then he'll tell everyone who laughs at him parading around naked that they're not smart.
我敢打赌，有人可以说服特朗普他有一种只有聪明人才能看到的布料，并说服他用这种隐形-显形布料做一套西装，然后他会告诉所有嘲笑他裸体游行的人他们不聪明。
@jackrice2770
I'll bet that someone could convince Trump that he has cloth that only smart people can see and convinces him to have a suit made of this invisible-visible clothing. Then he'll tell everyone who laughs at him parading around naked that they're not smart.
我敢打赌，有人可以说服特朗普他有一种只有聪明人才能看到的布料，并说服他用这种隐形-显形布料做一套西装，然后他会告诉所有嘲笑他裸体游行的人他们不聪明。
@RuiPedroCovelo
I don't get US politics. I am used to everyone criticising whoever is in charge, to keep them accountable and driving in the right direction. Not having half the country kissing the presidents ass like they're on his payroll.
我不理解美国的政治。我习惯了每个人都批评当权者，让他们负起责任并朝着正确的方向前进，而不是让半个国家像领他薪水一样拍总统的马屁。
I don't get US politics. I am used to everyone criticising whoever is in charge, to keep them accountable and driving in the right direction. Not having half the country kissing the presidents ass like they're on his payroll.
我不理解美国的政治。我习惯了每个人都批评当权者，让他们负起责任并朝着正确的方向前进，而不是让半个国家像领他薪水一样拍总统的马屁。
@michaelkirkland6573
It makes me sick to see these nasty people on fox news talk about "tightening the belt" and not worrying about 401k. Like Musk suggesting that Americans would have to suffer initially during their cuts. Easy for them to say, they aren't living on a shoestring budget!
看到福克斯新闻上这些讨厌的人谈论"勒紧裤腰带"和不担心401k让我感到恶心。就像马斯克建议美国人在削减开支初期必须受苦一样。他们说起来容易，因为他们不靠微薄的预算生活！
It makes me sick to see these nasty people on fox news talk about "tightening the belt" and not worrying about 401k. Like Musk suggesting that Americans would have to suffer initially during their cuts. Easy for them to say, they aren't living on a shoestring budget!
看到福克斯新闻上这些讨厌的人谈论"勒紧裤腰带"和不担心401k让我感到恶心。就像马斯克建议美国人在削减开支初期必须受苦一样。他们说起来容易，因为他们不靠微薄的预算生活！
@nazabounouar1888
A criminal played the stock market for his own benefit and for the benefit of his daughter's husband, Kashnor, and his billionaire friends, while the stupid people watch in silence.
一个罪犯为了自己的利益，也为了他女婿库什纳和他亿万富翁朋友们的利益操纵股市，而愚蠢的人们则默默观望。
A criminal played the stock market for his own benefit and for the benefit of his daughter's husband, Kashnor, and his billionaire friends, while the stupid people watch in silence.
一个罪犯为了自己的利益，也为了他女婿库什纳和他亿万富翁朋友们的利益操纵股市，而愚蠢的人们则默默观望。
@doncook3584
Keep the pressure on Louisiana mike Johnson to bring impeachment vote to floor. Let jd know he will also get tossed if he steps out of line.
继续向路易斯安那州的迈克·约翰逊施压，要求将弹劾投票提上日程。让特朗普知道如果他越界也会被抛弃。
Keep the pressure on Louisiana mike Johnson to bring impeachment vote to floor. Let jd know he will also get tossed if he steps out of line.
继续向路易斯安那州的迈克·约翰逊施压，要求将弹劾投票提上日程。让特朗普知道如果他越界也会被抛弃。
@michellecuervo-n7t
Yes Adam please investigate trump and is advisors of why how the stock market rose up so quickly after the pause on the tariffs
是的，亚当，请调查特朗普和他的顾问们为什么在关税暂停后股市上涨得如此之快？
Yes Adam please investigate trump and is advisors of why how the stock market rose up so quickly after the pause on the tariffs
是的，亚当，请调查特朗普和他的顾问们为什么在关税暂停后股市上涨得如此之快？
@MyK9dog
You are a god sent. That's a bit more religious than whats I normally feel. But it is true.
你是天赐的，这比我通常的感觉更宗教化，但这是事实。
You are a god sent. That's a bit more religious than whats I normally feel. But it is true.
你是天赐的，这比我通常的感觉更宗教化，但这是事实。
@smark1180
Do you really need the clickbait headlines?
The word "destroys" is hyperbolic.
It implies a dramatic or humiliating takedown — but it simply means that you criticized or disagreed with someone else in a political setting.
你真的需要这些点击诱饵标题吗？
"摧毁"这个词太夸张了。
它暗示着戏剧性或羞辱性的打击——但实际上只是意味着你在政治场合批评或不同意某人。
Do you really need the clickbait headlines?
The word "destroys" is hyperbolic.
It implies a dramatic or humiliating takedown — but it simply means that you criticized or disagreed with someone else in a political setting.
你真的需要这些点击诱饵标题吗？
"摧毁"这个词太夸张了。
它暗示着戏剧性或羞辱性的打击——但实际上只是意味着你在政治场合批评或不同意某人。
@BeautifulOaks
We must strive for a Better than Normal government that seeks to improve itself with good conscience, common sense, with the consent of The People and Civil Rights for The People.
"Normal" is in the past.
The "normal" United States of America government had loopholes in the laws that allowed wrenches of bias people and bias policies to stall the mechanisms of the three branch system of government.
Though our progress for a United States of America is like rowing at the speed of the slowest rowers because their efforts, intellect and experiences are valid, too; the American Dream is worth it together.
我们必须努力建立一个"优于正常"的政府，以良知、常识、人民的同意和人民的公民权利来改善自己。
"正常"已成为过去。
"正常"的美利坚合众国政府在法律上存在漏洞，允许有偏见的人和有偏见的政策阻碍政府三权分立机制的运行。
尽管我们为美利坚合众国取得的进步就像以最慢的划船速度前进，因为他们的努力、智力和经验也是有效的；但美国梦值得我们共同努力。
We must strive for a Better than Normal government that seeks to improve itself with good conscience, common sense, with the consent of The People and Civil Rights for The People.
"Normal" is in the past.
The "normal" United States of America government had loopholes in the laws that allowed wrenches of bias people and bias policies to stall the mechanisms of the three branch system of government.
Though our progress for a United States of America is like rowing at the speed of the slowest rowers because their efforts, intellect and experiences are valid, too; the American Dream is worth it together.
我们必须努力建立一个"优于正常"的政府，以良知、常识、人民的同意和人民的公民权利来改善自己。
"正常"已成为过去。
"正常"的美利坚合众国政府在法律上存在漏洞，允许有偏见的人和有偏见的政策阻碍政府三权分立机制的运行。
尽管我们为美利坚合众国取得的进步就像以最慢的划船速度前进，因为他们的努力、智力和经验也是有效的；但美国梦值得我们共同努力。
@DailyFrankPeter
Doesn't insider trading also damage investors' confidence? And the world it watching.
I mean it looks like it's a great time to buy... other countries' stock.
内幕交易不是也会损害投资者的信心吗？而且全世界都在看着。
我的意思是现在看起来是买入...其他国家股票的好时机。
Doesn't insider trading also damage investors' confidence? And the world it watching.
I mean it looks like it's a great time to buy... other countries' stock.
内幕交易不是也会损害投资者的信心吗？而且全世界都在看着。
我的意思是现在看起来是买入...其他国家股票的好时机。
@ChristineRichards-c6e
I think the Supreme Court said Trump can't be charged for anything they gave him the power to do anything he wants to
我认为最高法院的意思是特朗普不能被指控任何行为，他们给了他做任何他想做的事的权力。
I think the Supreme Court said Trump can't be charged for anything they gave him the power to do anything he wants to
我认为最高法院的意思是特朗普不能被指控任何行为，他们给了他做任何他想做的事的权力。
@shaneharris2355
Thank you so much for standing up and possibly holding Donald Trump accountable for insider trading.
It is a terrible thing when your fearless leader is such a thief and manipulating the market.
非常感谢你站出来，可能要追究唐纳德·特朗普的内幕交易责任。
当你们无畏的领袖是个小偷并操纵市场时，这是件可怕的事情。
Thank you so much for standing up and possibly holding Donald Trump accountable for insider trading.
It is a terrible thing when your fearless leader is such a thief and manipulating the market.
非常感谢你站出来，可能要追究唐纳德·特朗普的内幕交易责任。
当你们无畏的领袖是个小偷并操纵市场时，这是件可怕的事情。
@CHHickory
I don't have a dog in this fight, but from afar it looks fishy. Billionaires, friends and family in on it, proof of concept with 'mistake' email midweek revoked in 5 minutes by the Trump team. 'Please send appropriate untraceable donations' to the Trump coffers in exchange for email notifying intended announcements etc etc. I wouldn't be surprised if his pal Vlad is in on it. Underlying it all is this resentment that he isn't the worlds richest man....yet. His South African so-called chum is.
我在这场争斗中没有利益关系，但从远处看这很可疑。亿万富翁、朋友和家人参与其中，周三的"错误"邮件概念验证在5分钟内被特朗普团队撤销。"请发送适当的不可追踪捐款"到特朗普的金库，以换取通知预定公告的邮件等等。如果他的朋友弗拉德也参与其中，我不会感到惊讶。这一切背后是他还不是世界首富的怨恨....而他那所谓的南非朋友已经是了。
I don't have a dog in this fight, but from afar it looks fishy. Billionaires, friends and family in on it, proof of concept with 'mistake' email midweek revoked in 5 minutes by the Trump team. 'Please send appropriate untraceable donations' to the Trump coffers in exchange for email notifying intended announcements etc etc. I wouldn't be surprised if his pal Vlad is in on it. Underlying it all is this resentment that he isn't the worlds richest man....yet. His South African so-called chum is.
我在这场争斗中没有利益关系，但从远处看这很可疑。亿万富翁、朋友和家人参与其中，周三的"错误"邮件概念验证在5分钟内被特朗普团队撤销。"请发送适当的不可追踪捐款"到特朗普的金库，以换取通知预定公告的邮件等等。如果他的朋友弗拉德也参与其中，我不会感到惊讶。这一切背后是他还不是世界首富的怨恨....而他那所谓的南非朋友已经是了。
@DaveMeier-z2t
can anyone say with facts where the funds went from the sale of the 2100 precision missile's sold to the Saudis last month? Also what the build cost was by them time they were in US military hands?
DID AMERICANS TURN A PROFIT?
MARKED THEM UP 35% I HOPE !!
有人能用事实说明上个月出售给沙特阿拉伯的2100枚精确导弹的资金去向吗？还有它们在美国军方手中时的制造成本是多少？
美国人赚钱了吗？
我希望加价了35%！！
can anyone say with facts where the funds went from the sale of the 2100 precision missile's sold to the Saudis last month? Also what the build cost was by them time they were in US military hands?
DID AMERICANS TURN A PROFIT?
MARKED THEM UP 35% I HOPE !!
有人能用事实说明上个月出售给沙特阿拉伯的2100枚精确导弹的资金去向吗？还有它们在美国军方手中时的制造成本是多少？
美国人赚钱了吗？
我希望加价了35%！！
@user-vk7cp1op9p
The people want to be and to do "good". They "hear" Trump's permission to be criminal like he chooses , floated out to the public, but it sits wrong on them. There are just a few taking advantage, but most people are not criminals and want their president to respect the people and government, and choose Democracy. They dearly want to respect their President, if his behavior permits. (Remove Trump from office.)
Fine video!
人民想要成为并做"好人"。他们"听到"特朗普允许像他选择的那样犯罪的信息被传播给公众，这让他们感到不适。只有少数人在利用这一点，但大多数人不是罪犯，他们希望总统尊重人民和政府并选择民主。如果他的行为允许，他们非常愿意尊重他们的总统。(把特朗普赶下台。)
好视频！
The people want to be and to do "good". They "hear" Trump's permission to be criminal like he chooses , floated out to the public, but it sits wrong on them. There are just a few taking advantage, but most people are not criminals and want their president to respect the people and government, and choose Democracy. They dearly want to respect their President, if his behavior permits. (Remove Trump from office.)
Fine video!
人民想要成为并做"好人"。他们"听到"特朗普允许像他选择的那样犯罪的信息被传播给公众，这让他们感到不适。只有少数人在利用这一点，但大多数人不是罪犯，他们希望总统尊重人民和政府并选择民主。如果他的行为允许，他们非常愿意尊重他们的总统。(把特朗普赶下台。)
好视频！
@loboblack3092
I think you may be giving Darth Cheeto too much credit. I don't believe he even knows how the stock market works...I believe his backers told him to stop and he did. Sort of.
我认为你可能给"Darth Cheeto"太多赞誉了。我不认为他甚至知道股市是如何运作的...我相信是他的支持者告诉他停止，他就停止了。差不多是这样。
I think you may be giving Darth Cheeto too much credit. I don't believe he even knows how the stock market works...I believe his backers told him to stop and he did. Sort of.
我认为你可能给"Darth Cheeto"太多赞誉了。我不认为他甚至知道股市是如何运作的...我相信是他的支持者告诉他停止，他就停止了。差不多是这样。
@jasonwells8528
We need to fix immigration mess by passing new laws making it federal crime to enter, aid or abet illegal immigration. This disregard of law by Democrats needs to stop.
我们需要通过新的法律来修复移民混乱，将进入、协助或教唆非法移民定为联邦犯罪。民主党人这种无视法律的行为必须停止。
We need to fix immigration mess by passing new laws making it federal crime to enter, aid or abet illegal immigration. This disregard of law by Democrats needs to stop.
我们需要通过新的法律来修复移民混乱，将进入、协助或教唆非法移民定为联邦犯罪。民主党人这种无视法律的行为必须停止。
@stephanM5
Insider trading is a problem in both parties. I'm not sticking up for the despot Trump but Pelosi has to be looked at too. Politicians who become multimillionaires on a modest salary didn't get there by investing in the traditional investments.
内幕交易是两党都存在的问题。我不是在为暴君特朗普辩护，但佩洛西也必须被调查。那些靠微薄薪水成为千万富翁的政客们，不是通过传统投资达到这一点的。
Insider trading is a problem in both parties. I'm not sticking up for the despot Trump but Pelosi has to be looked at too. Politicians who become multimillionaires on a modest salary didn't get there by investing in the traditional investments.
内幕交易是两党都存在的问题。我不是在为暴君特朗普辩护，但佩洛西也必须被调查。那些靠微薄薪水成为千万富翁的政客们，不是通过传统投资达到这一点的。
@denisbeaucage6094
I am not américain but canadien. From my point of view its was a strategy to some peapel make money but the issues will very ard to prove it. He advice publicly its time to buy. But its not the présidential attitude to advice things like that
我不是美国人而是加拿大人。从我的角度来看，这是一些人赚钱的策略，但问题将很难证明。他公开建议现在是买入时机，但给出这样的建议不是总统应有的态度。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I am not américain but canadien. From my point of view its was a strategy to some peapel make money but the issues will very ard to prove it. He advice publicly its time to buy. But its not the présidential attitude to advice things like that
我不是美国人而是加拿大人。从我的角度来看，这是一些人赚钱的策略，但问题将很难证明。他公开建议现在是买入时机，但给出这样的建议不是总统应有的态度。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@Personofinterest888
Is this all for show? Reporting to the office of government ethics, is that the best you have?
OGE has been notified that the President is removing David Huitema as the Director of OGE. OGE is reverting to an Acting Director. Please see OGE's Organizational Leadership webpage.10 Feb 2025
这一切都是做戏吗？向政府道德办公室报告，这就是你们最好的办法？
政府道德办公室已接到通知，总统将免去David Huitema的OGE主任职务。OGE将恢复为代理主任。请参阅OGE的组织领导网页。2025年2月10日
Is this all for show? Reporting to the office of government ethics, is that the best you have?
OGE has been notified that the President is removing David Huitema as the Director of OGE. OGE is reverting to an Acting Director. Please see OGE's Organizational Leadership webpage.10 Feb 2025
这一切都是做戏吗？向政府道德办公室报告，这就是你们最好的办法？
政府道德办公室已接到通知，总统将免去David Huitema的OGE主任职务。OGE将恢复为代理主任。请参阅OGE的组织领导网页。2025年2月10日
@DEAFJAM77
Sick of lawmakers putting bills in place that protect president from being charged for committing crimes, I think lawmakers should go to prison for every crime the president commits, someone needs to be held accountable, might as well be the guy who signed these laws into place, sounds crazy but accountability needs to be met or you'll end up with someone like Putin who won't go away!
我厌倦了立法者制定保护总统免于因犯罪被起诉的法案，我认为立法者应该为总统犯下的每一项罪行入狱，需要有人承担责任，不妨是签署这些法律的人。虽然听起来很疯狂，但必须追究责任，否则最终会得到像普京这样不会下台的人！
Sick of lawmakers putting bills in place that protect president from being charged for committing crimes, I think lawmakers should go to prison for every crime the president commits, someone needs to be held accountable, might as well be the guy who signed these laws into place, sounds crazy but accountability needs to be met or you'll end up with someone like Putin who won't go away!
我厌倦了立法者制定保护总统免于因犯罪被起诉的法案，我认为立法者应该为总统犯下的每一项罪行入狱，需要有人承担责任，不妨是签署这些法律的人。虽然听起来很疯狂，但必须追究责任，否则最终会得到像普京这样不会下台的人！
@kerryblaine6074
Who investgates insider trading trading in congress??? Congress !!! They approve themselves to enrich themselves. Almost all in congress insider trade why are they supprised when Trump does it more and better. People go into congress with 1 million networth and leace with 100,00 million net worth from insider trading. Why do you think they stay in congress untill thay die??? So much momey to be made for themselves... America is the best country money can buy and it has been sold to polititions and billionaires
谁来调查国会内部的内幕交易？？？国会自己！！！他们批准自己致富。几乎所有的国会议员都在进行内幕交易，为什么当特朗普做得更多更好时他们会感到惊讶。人们进入国会时净资产是100万美元，通过内幕交易离开时净资产是1亿美元。你认为他们为什么一直待在国会直到去世？？？因为在那里可以为自己赚取太多钱...美国是金钱能买到的最好的国家，它已经被卖给了政客和亿万富翁。
Who investgates insider trading trading in congress??? Congress !!! They approve themselves to enrich themselves. Almost all in congress insider trade why are they supprised when Trump does it more and better. People go into congress with 1 million networth and leace with 100,00 million net worth from insider trading. Why do you think they stay in congress untill thay die??? So much momey to be made for themselves... America is the best country money can buy and it has been sold to polititions and billionaires
谁来调查国会内部的内幕交易？？？国会自己！！！他们批准自己致富。几乎所有的国会议员都在进行内幕交易，为什么当特朗普做得更多更好时他们会感到惊讶。人们进入国会时净资产是100万美元，通过内幕交易离开时净资产是1亿美元。你认为他们为什么一直待在国会直到去世？？？因为在那里可以为自己赚取太多钱...美国是金钱能买到的最好的国家，它已经被卖给了政客和亿万富翁。
@jimmyboylan2700
Trump should be arrested for insider trading, if anyone else did that they'd be arrested for sure. Maybe the one's that benefited by this should also be arrested and made to give back whatever money they made on it.
特朗普应该因内幕交易被捕，如果是其他人这样做肯定会被捕。也许那些从中受益的人也应该被捕，并被要求退还他们从中赚取的所有钱。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Trump should be arrested for insider trading, if anyone else did that they'd be arrested for sure. Maybe the one's that benefited by this should also be arrested and made to give back whatever money they made on it.
特朗普应该因内幕交易被捕，如果是其他人这样做肯定会被捕。也许那些从中受益的人也应该被捕，并被要求退还他们从中赚取的所有钱。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@thinkplanetearth2946
No question that what is happening is market manipulation and insider trading. But to pretend that insider trading is something new for congress members in the Trump administration is really disingenuous. Both sides of the aisle having been doing this for years. I recall vividly, years ago, when Steve Croft from 60 Minutes in a press conference questioned Nancy Pelosi about her trades and how she was able to be doing better than the market, the look she shot him was that of irritation and the audacity of him questioning her. And the fact that this is being painted as something that is suddenly happening now is part of the problem and shows the partisanship at its worst. It's simply more brazen now instead of behind closed doors.
毫无疑问，正在发生的是市场操纵和内幕交易，但假装内幕交易对特朗普政府的国会议员来说是新鲜事，这真的很虚伪。两党多年来一直在这样做。我清楚地记得多年前，当60分钟的史蒂夫·克罗夫特在新闻发布会上质疑南希·佩洛西的交易以及她如何能够比市场表现更好时，她看他的眼神充满了恼怒和对他胆敢质疑她的愤怒。而现在把这件事描绘成突然发生的事情，这是问题的一部分，显示了最恶劣的党派偏见。只是现在更加肆无忌惮，而不是在幕后进行。
No question that what is happening is market manipulation and insider trading. But to pretend that insider trading is something new for congress members in the Trump administration is really disingenuous. Both sides of the aisle having been doing this for years. I recall vividly, years ago, when Steve Croft from 60 Minutes in a press conference questioned Nancy Pelosi about her trades and how she was able to be doing better than the market, the look she shot him was that of irritation and the audacity of him questioning her. And the fact that this is being painted as something that is suddenly happening now is part of the problem and shows the partisanship at its worst. It's simply more brazen now instead of behind closed doors.
毫无疑问，正在发生的是市场操纵和内幕交易，但假装内幕交易对特朗普政府的国会议员来说是新鲜事，这真的很虚伪。两党多年来一直在这样做。我清楚地记得多年前，当60分钟的史蒂夫·克罗夫特在新闻发布会上质疑南希·佩洛西的交易以及她如何能够比市场表现更好时，她看他的眼神充满了恼怒和对他胆敢质疑她的愤怒。而现在把这件事描绘成突然发生的事情，这是问题的一部分，显示了最恶劣的党派偏见。只是现在更加肆无忌惮，而不是在幕后进行。
@clementdan9417
Yeah, it's crazy how a change in tariffs or price hikes can throw everything off track. It's why I've been trying to be more mindful of where my money's going lately. Honestly, after hearing this, I realize I need some guidance on how to handle these situations better. The ups and downs are just unpredictable, and it's hard to stay on top of everything.
是啊，关税变动或涨价能让一切脱轨，这太疯狂了。所以我最近特别注意资金流向。说实话，听完这个我意识到我需要专业的指导来更好地应对。涨跌难以预测，全面掌控太难了。
Yeah, it's crazy how a change in tariffs or price hikes can throw everything off track. It's why I've been trying to be more mindful of where my money's going lately. Honestly, after hearing this, I realize I need some guidance on how to handle these situations better. The ups and downs are just unpredictable, and it's hard to stay on top of everything.
是啊，关税变动或涨价能让一切脱轨，这太疯狂了。所以我最近特别注意资金流向。说实话，听完这个我意识到我需要专业的指导来更好地应对。涨跌难以预测，全面掌控太难了。
@wadthecrap
What is the White House talking about? Countries are calling the White House because they suddenly got jumped by tariffs. Say America is like your friendliest electrical service provider, you have been subscribing to them for decades, then one fine day they suddenly spiked your price by 50%. Would your first response be "ok! I'm gonna switch providers!" Or would you call the company first and figure out what's going on.
白宫到底在胡说八道些什么？各国之所以打电话给白宫，完全是因为突然遭到了关税的突袭。这就好比美国是你合作了几十年的电力公司，某天突然毫无征兆地把电价上调了50%。正常人的第一反应会是"好吧，我马上换供应商"吗？难道不是应该先打电话问清楚到底发生了什么情况吗？
What is the White House talking about? Countries are calling the White House because they suddenly got jumped by tariffs. Say America is like your friendliest electrical service provider, you have been subscribing to them for decades, then one fine day they suddenly spiked your price by 50%. Would your first response be "ok! I'm gonna switch providers!" Or would you call the company first and figure out what's going on.
白宫到底在胡说八道些什么？各国之所以打电话给白宫，完全是因为突然遭到了关税的突袭。这就好比美国是你合作了几十年的电力公司，某天突然毫无征兆地把电价上调了50%。正常人的第一反应会是"好吧，我马上换供应商"吗？难道不是应该先打电话问清楚到底发生了什么情况吗？
@Joe-ij6of
The issue is NOT: Free Trade vs Blanket Tariff Barriers... The TPP bound up all of the major pacific countries in a trade agreement that excluded China, and included environmental standards and labor standards. It also had issues where corporations could sue countries under it via its treaty status. China swooped in and resurrected it as the Comprehnsive TPP, one that put them in charge and boxed out the US after Trump pulled out.
We need targeted tariffs that correspond to industries that we also bootstrap via industrial policy. These tariffs should be under a reliable and long-lasting trade deal, and should be friendly with allies and assertive with competitors. Blanket tariffs on everything but then on a weekend you spring on us that your billionaire buddies from the inauguration are getting some exemptions, but don't worry they're "temporary", are a terrible idea being terribly executed.
问题的关键根本不是自由贸易与全面关税壁垒之争...《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(TPP)原本将环太平洋的主要国家凝聚成了一个排除中国的贸易联盟，其中还包含了环保和劳工标准。虽然该协定确实存在允许企业通过条约地位起诉国家的争议条款，但在特朗普退出后，中国立即趁虚而入，将其改组为《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(CPTPP)，不仅掌握了主导权，还将美国彻底排除在外。
我们真正需要的是与产业政策相匹配的精准关税，这些关税应当基于可靠且长期的贸易协定来实施，对盟友保持友善，对竞争者则采取强硬态度。而现在这种对所有商品全面征收关税，却在某个周末突然宣布给就职典礼上的亿万富翁朋友们"临时"豁免的做法，完全就是个执行得一塌糊涂的馊主意。
The issue is NOT: Free Trade vs Blanket Tariff Barriers... The TPP bound up all of the major pacific countries in a trade agreement that excluded China, and included environmental standards and labor standards. It also had issues where corporations could sue countries under it via its treaty status. China swooped in and resurrected it as the Comprehnsive TPP, one that put them in charge and boxed out the US after Trump pulled out.
We need targeted tariffs that correspond to industries that we also bootstrap via industrial policy. These tariffs should be under a reliable and long-lasting trade deal, and should be friendly with allies and assertive with competitors. Blanket tariffs on everything but then on a weekend you spring on us that your billionaire buddies from the inauguration are getting some exemptions, but don't worry they're "temporary", are a terrible idea being terribly executed.
问题的关键根本不是自由贸易与全面关税壁垒之争...《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(TPP)原本将环太平洋的主要国家凝聚成了一个排除中国的贸易联盟，其中还包含了环保和劳工标准。虽然该协定确实存在允许企业通过条约地位起诉国家的争议条款，但在特朗普退出后，中国立即趁虚而入，将其改组为《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(CPTPP)，不仅掌握了主导权，还将美国彻底排除在外。
我们真正需要的是与产业政策相匹配的精准关税，这些关税应当基于可靠且长期的贸易协定来实施，对盟友保持友善，对竞争者则采取强硬态度。而现在这种对所有商品全面征收关税，却在某个周末突然宣布给就职典礼上的亿万富翁朋友们"临时"豁免的做法，完全就是个执行得一塌糊涂的馊主意。
@shelliesmith999
Is he doing this so he can say see, you people messed up this great thing tariff I gave you. Now that all these businesses are gone, let the oligarchs buy them and run them. Let's centralize the economy because only trump knows best.
他搞这一出是不是就为了日后能说："看吧，你们这些人把我精心制定的伟大关税政策给搞砸了"？等到这些企业全都倒闭之后，正好让那些寡头们低价收购，然后由他们来掌控经营。最终实现"只有特朗普最懂经济"的中央集权式经济模式？
Is he doing this so he can say see, you people messed up this great thing tariff I gave you. Now that all these businesses are gone, let the oligarchs buy them and run them. Let's centralize the economy because only trump knows best.
他搞这一出是不是就为了日后能说："看吧，你们这些人把我精心制定的伟大关税政策给搞砸了"？等到这些企业全都倒闭之后，正好让那些寡头们低价收购，然后由他们来掌控经营。最终实现"只有特朗普最懂经济"的中央集权式经济模式？
@ObscuritiesByJude
Thank you, Tara, for saying it like it is! Sometimes it is so frustrating the way they talk about Trump as if he is a NORMAL HUMAN BEING. NO!!! He is not. He has no plan, he has no strategy, he has no idea at all how to run an economy/business/government, he has no intelligence, and most importantly he has no humanity.
Tara，感谢你说出了事实的真相！有时候看着他们谈论特朗普时，就好像他是个正常人一样，这简直让人抓狂。不！！！他根本不是——他既没有计划，也没有策略，完全不懂得如何管理经济/企业/政府，缺乏基本的智商，而最重要的是他根本就没有人性可言。
Thank you, Tara, for saying it like it is! Sometimes it is so frustrating the way they talk about Trump as if he is a NORMAL HUMAN BEING. NO!!! He is not. He has no plan, he has no strategy, he has no idea at all how to run an economy/business/government, he has no intelligence, and most importantly he has no humanity.
Tara，感谢你说出了事实的真相！有时候看着他们谈论特朗普时，就好像他是个正常人一样，这简直让人抓狂。不！！！他根本不是——他既没有计划，也没有策略，完全不懂得如何管理经济/企业/政府，缺乏基本的智商，而最重要的是他根本就没有人性可言。
@AJCastilla
Honestly, both the days leading up to when Trump applied his tariffs need to be investigated to see whom that he knows, included GOP elected, may have protectively moved their money in advance, along with...an also need to also investigate the days and hours afterwards before Trump suddenly ended the majority of his world tariffs. What did they know and when did they know it?
说真的，必须对特朗普实施关税前后的那几天展开彻底的调查——看看都有哪些他的亲信（包括共和党议员）提前转移了资产。同样需要调查的是在他突然取消大部分全球关税前的最后几个小时里发生了什么。他们到底掌握了什么内幕消息？又是什么时候掌握这些消息的？
Honestly, both the days leading up to when Trump applied his tariffs need to be investigated to see whom that he knows, included GOP elected, may have protectively moved their money in advance, along with...an also need to also investigate the days and hours afterwards before Trump suddenly ended the majority of his world tariffs. What did they know and when did they know it?
说真的，必须对特朗普实施关税前后的那几天展开彻底的调查——看看都有哪些他的亲信（包括共和党议员）提前转移了资产。同样需要调查的是在他突然取消大部分全球关税前的最后几个小时里发生了什么。他们到底掌握了什么内幕消息？又是什么时候掌握这些消息的？
@ebok33643
United States has over 30trillionindebt.UnitedStatespay2 billion per day just in interest. The debt is expected to increase by 15-17 trillion over the next 10 years. The debt is mainly funded by US Government Bonds who are held by Japan, China, UK and Luxembourg as the top 4 nations. If these bonds are dumped (US pays back the money lent) the future lending cost to pay debt will skyrocket up from $2B per day due to demand for cash. Trump aborted widespread tariffs when this started to occur a few days ago. He can bankrupt this country within 6 months if he follows the current path. Tarrifs are not the cheat code for paying out debt.
美国目前背负着超过30万亿美元的巨额债务，每天仅利息支出就高达20亿美元。预计未来十年债务还将增加15-17万亿美元。这些债务主要通过美国政府债券来融资，而日本、中国、英国和卢森堡是持有美债最多的四个国家。如果这些国家开始大规模抛售美债（即要求美国偿还借款），由于现金需求激增，美国未来的每日偿债成本将从现在的20亿美元飙升至天文数字。几天前特朗普突然叫停全面关税政策正是因为出现了这种危险的苗头。如果他继续坚持当前的政策路线，完全有可能在六个月内就让美国破产。关税政策根本就不是偿还债务的什么"作弊码"。
United States has over 30trillionindebt.UnitedStatespay2 billion per day just in interest. The debt is expected to increase by 15-17 trillion over the next 10 years. The debt is mainly funded by US Government Bonds who are held by Japan, China, UK and Luxembourg as the top 4 nations. If these bonds are dumped (US pays back the money lent) the future lending cost to pay debt will skyrocket up from $2B per day due to demand for cash. Trump aborted widespread tariffs when this started to occur a few days ago. He can bankrupt this country within 6 months if he follows the current path. Tarrifs are not the cheat code for paying out debt.
美国目前背负着超过30万亿美元的巨额债务，每天仅利息支出就高达20亿美元。预计未来十年债务还将增加15-17万亿美元。这些债务主要通过美国政府债券来融资，而日本、中国、英国和卢森堡是持有美债最多的四个国家。如果这些国家开始大规模抛售美债（即要求美国偿还借款），由于现金需求激增，美国未来的每日偿债成本将从现在的20亿美元飙升至天文数字。几天前特朗普突然叫停全面关税政策正是因为出现了这种危险的苗头。如果他继续坚持当前的政策路线，完全有可能在六个月内就让美国破产。关税政策根本就不是偿还债务的什么"作弊码"。
@AristoclesPlaton
The tariffs will cause retail prices of goods on which tariffs are levied to go up. But the question of which goods is important. Domestically produced items that will not go up, are likely to go down. Why? For example, if your iPhone costs more, you will have that much less to spend on other things, which is the same as falling demand for those other things, which causes prices to go DOWN. Domestically produced items that are not having to factor tariff costs into the retail price (including not using raw materials that are subjected to tariffs) will be squeezed. Some producers may go out of business. Tariffs will cause less general inflation that some people fear.
关税确实会导致被征税商品的零售价格上涨，但关键在于对哪些商品征税。那些不受影响的国产商品的价格反而可能会下降。为什么呢？举个例子，如果你的iPhone涨价了，你能花在其他东西上的钱就变少了，这等同于降低了其他商品的需求，从而导致它们的价格下跌。而那些不需要将关税成本计入零售价的国产商品（包括不使用被征税原材料的商品）将会受到挤压，部分生产商可能会因此倒闭。总体而言，关税引发的通货膨胀可能会比某些人担心的要轻微一些。
The tariffs will cause retail prices of goods on which tariffs are levied to go up. But the question of which goods is important. Domestically produced items that will not go up, are likely to go down. Why? For example, if your iPhone costs more, you will have that much less to spend on other things, which is the same as falling demand for those other things, which causes prices to go DOWN. Domestically produced items that are not having to factor tariff costs into the retail price (including not using raw materials that are subjected to tariffs) will be squeezed. Some producers may go out of business. Tariffs will cause less general inflation that some people fear.
关税确实会导致被征税商品的零售价格上涨，但关键在于对哪些商品征税。那些不受影响的国产商品的价格反而可能会下降。为什么呢？举个例子，如果你的iPhone涨价了，你能花在其他东西上的钱就变少了，这等同于降低了其他商品的需求，从而导致它们的价格下跌。而那些不需要将关税成本计入零售价的国产商品（包括不使用被征税原材料的商品）将会受到挤压，部分生产商可能会因此倒闭。总体而言，关税引发的通货膨胀可能会比某些人担心的要轻微一些。
@iamkjb1
I wouldn't have anything from the US if they gave it away free. I've had many vacations in the US but never again. Traders made a fortune shorting the market and will make another fortune when the inevitable bounce comes.
现在就算白送，我都不会要任何美国货。虽然我曾经多次去美国度假，但以后绝对不会再去了。那些做空市场的交易员们已经赚得盆满钵满，等到市场必然反弹的时候，他们还会再大赚一笔。
I wouldn't have anything from the US if they gave it away free. I've had many vacations in the US but never again. Traders made a fortune shorting the market and will make another fortune when the inevitable bounce comes.
现在就算白送，我都不会要任何美国货。虽然我曾经多次去美国度假，但以后绝对不会再去了。那些做空市场的交易员们已经赚得盆满钵满，等到市场必然反弹的时候，他们还会再大赚一笔。
@jammysau
what boggles my mind about this whole trade/tariff/manufacturing thing is, yes, the us doesn't have a strong manufacturing base like it used to, and that's mainly because services have taken over to represent that economic power. this is stuff like banking, tech, entertainment, "high skilled labor" if you will. instead of wanting to expand access to such jobs for more people, this admin is so focused on trying to get us to make toothbrushes and can openers again, and guess what, we won't get that stuff back. and even if we did, not many americans i know would either want to work in a facility like that, or pay for the cost of that product once it's packaged.
最让我百思不得其解的是：没错，美国确实已经不像过去那样拥有强大的制造业基础了，这主要是因为服务业（比如银行业、科技业、娱乐业这些所谓的"高技能行业"）已经成为了经济支柱。可是本届政府不去思考如何为更多人创造这些高端就业机会，却一门心思地想要让我们重新回去生产牙刷和开罐器这种低端产品。猜猜会怎样？我们根本不可能重新拾起这些产业。退一万步说，就算真的能，我认识的美国人里也没有几个愿意在这种工厂工作，或者愿意为这些产品支付涨价后的包装成本。
what boggles my mind about this whole trade/tariff/manufacturing thing is, yes, the us doesn't have a strong manufacturing base like it used to, and that's mainly because services have taken over to represent that economic power. this is stuff like banking, tech, entertainment, "high skilled labor" if you will. instead of wanting to expand access to such jobs for more people, this admin is so focused on trying to get us to make toothbrushes and can openers again, and guess what, we won't get that stuff back. and even if we did, not many americans i know would either want to work in a facility like that, or pay for the cost of that product once it's packaged.
最让我百思不得其解的是：没错，美国确实已经不像过去那样拥有强大的制造业基础了，这主要是因为服务业（比如银行业、科技业、娱乐业这些所谓的"高技能行业"）已经成为了经济支柱。可是本届政府不去思考如何为更多人创造这些高端就业机会，却一门心思地想要让我们重新回去生产牙刷和开罐器这种低端产品。猜猜会怎样？我们根本不可能重新拾起这些产业。退一万步说，就算真的能，我认识的美国人里也没有几个愿意在这种工厂工作，或者愿意为这些产品支付涨价后的包装成本。
很赞 7
收藏