小米 SU7 是我驾驶过的最好的中国汽车！我的完整之旅和首次驾驶（2）
正文翻译
传统的美国汽车制造商得到了大量的补贴和多次救助，但他们的汽车仍然是垃圾，仍然非常昂贵。是供应链和自动化让这些中国汽车变得物美价廉。
评论翻译
@arunantony3207
As a technologist in this space, what I like about your video is you took time to explain who and what xiaomi does. Which is amazing and many people really dont understand this here in the US. So thank you. I think we really can't compete with Chineses automakers hence all the Chinese tariffs. If we true competition - apple would die or won't have the same level of dominance and everyone wouldn't be buying a Tesla. Better choice for consumers to say the least.
作为这个领域的技术专家，我喜欢你的视频的一点是你花时间解释了小米是做什么的。这一点很了不起，在美国，很多人真的不了解这一点，谢谢你。我认为我们真的无法与中国的汽车制造商竞争，因此才会对中国汽车征收关税。如果我们有真正的竞争--苹果就会死掉或者不会有同样的主导地位，大家也不会买特斯拉了。至少可以说，消费者会有更好的选择。
@arunantony3207
As a technologist in this space, what I like about your video is you took time to explain who and what xiaomi does. Which is amazing and many people really dont understand this here in the US. So thank you. I think we really can't compete with Chineses automakers hence all the Chinese tariffs. If we true competition - apple would die or won't have the same level of dominance and everyone wouldn't be buying a Tesla. Better choice for consumers to say the least.
作为这个领域的技术专家，我喜欢你的视频的一点是你花时间解释了小米是做什么的。这一点很了不起，在美国，很多人真的不了解这一点，谢谢你。我认为我们真的无法与中国的汽车制造商竞争，因此才会对中国汽车征收关税。如果我们有真正的竞争--苹果就会死掉或者不会有同样的主导地位，大家也不会买特斯拉了。至少可以说，消费者会有更好的选择。
@freetorobandloot
Legacy American auto makers are heavily subsidized and bailed out many times but their cars are still crap and still extremely expensive. It is the supply chain and automation that makes these Chinese cars affordable.
传统的美国汽车制造商得到了大量的补贴和多次救助，但他们的汽车仍然是垃圾，仍然非常昂贵。是供应链和自动化让这些中国汽车变得物美价廉。
Legacy American auto makers are heavily subsidized and bailed out many times but their cars are still crap and still extremely expensive. It is the supply chain and automation that makes these Chinese cars affordable.
传统的美国汽车制造商得到了大量的补贴和多次救助，但他们的汽车仍然是垃圾，仍然非常昂贵。是供应链和自动化让这些中国汽车变得物美价廉。
@theolich4384
Had the chance to drive a SU7 Pro (299 Ps, RWD, 95kwh LFP battery, ~$33,600) in Sichuan, China for a week. Mostly cruising on highway at 75 mph, I was constantly able to squeeze 400+ miles out of a single charge. The only thing I didn't like about the car was the CUPHOLDER that could hold nothing in place without a bit of aid.
我有机会在中国四川驾驶SU7 Pro（299 Ps，RWD，95kwh磷酸铁锂电池，约33600美元）一周，主要是在高速公路上以75英里/小时的速度巡航，一次充电能行驶400多英里。这辆车唯一让我不满意的地方是它的杯架，如果不借助一些辅助工具，它什么都固定不住。
Had the chance to drive a SU7 Pro (299 Ps, RWD, 95kwh LFP battery, ~$33,600) in Sichuan, China for a week. Mostly cruising on highway at 75 mph, I was constantly able to squeeze 400+ miles out of a single charge. The only thing I didn't like about the car was the CUPHOLDER that could hold nothing in place without a bit of aid.
我有机会在中国四川驾驶SU7 Pro（299 Ps，RWD，95kwh磷酸铁锂电池，约33600美元）一周，主要是在高速公路上以75英里/小时的速度巡航，一次充电能行驶400多英里。这辆车唯一让我不满意的地方是它的杯架，如果不借助一些辅助工具，它什么都固定不住。
@tonywei423
Not only that, while driving you can ask xiaoai Tongxue(xiaomi's voice control name) to do everything at home, like set the aircon before you arrive home, close the curtain, turn on the light, start heating the bed, start the pressure cooker or warm up the finished cooking, start drying the cloth, check fridge how much egg and milk left, et al.
不仅如此，在开车的时候，你还可以让小爱同学（小米的声控名）帮你做家里的任何事，比如到家前调好空调、拉上窗帘、打开电灯、开始暖床、启动高压锅或给做完的饭菜预热、开始晾晒衣物、查看冰箱里还有多少鸡蛋和牛奶等等。
Not only that, while driving you can ask xiaoai Tongxue(xiaomi's voice control name) to do everything at home, like set the aircon before you arrive home, close the curtain, turn on the light, start heating the bed, start the pressure cooker or warm up the finished cooking, start drying the cloth, check fridge how much egg and milk left, et al.
不仅如此，在开车的时候，你还可以让小爱同学（小米的声控名）帮你做家里的任何事，比如到家前调好空调、拉上窗帘、打开电灯、开始暖床、启动高压锅或给做完的饭菜预热、开始晾晒衣物、查看冰箱里还有多少鸡蛋和牛奶等等。
@cloudpandarism2627
confirmed! my home have alot xiaomi stuff and its all connected with my su7. i can check on my cat with the home cameras and give him food with the cat food dispenser. all while sitting in the car and just tell it what to do. in summer i use it to turn on AC before getting home.
确实！我家有很多小米的东西，它们都与我的su7相连。我可以用家用摄像头查看我的猫，用猫食分配器喂它食物。所有这些都是在坐在车里，只要告诉它该做什么就可以了。夏天我用它在回家前打开空调。
confirmed! my home have alot xiaomi stuff and its all connected with my su7. i can check on my cat with the home cameras and give him food with the cat food dispenser. all while sitting in the car and just tell it what to do. in summer i use it to turn on AC before getting home.
确实！我家有很多小米的东西，它们都与我的su7相连。我可以用家用摄像头查看我的猫，用猫食分配器喂它食物。所有这些都是在坐在车里，只要告诉它该做什么就可以了。夏天我用它在回家前打开空调。
@stargazer3828
The difference between Chinese EV automakers and legacy automakers is Chinese automakers are not focused on profits, but volume whereas the legacy automakers are focused on profits and low volume EVs. In order for legacy to "catch up" they would need to go several years with no profits as they invest in the technology and scaling, but no CEO is willing to eliminate profits on their watch.
中国电动汽车制造商与传统汽车制造商的区别在于中国汽车制造商关注的不是利润而是销量，而传统汽车制造商关注的是利润。为了让传统汽车制造商“迎头赶上”，他们需要在技术和规模投资方面连续几年不盈利，但没有一位首席执行官愿意在自己的眼皮底下消灭利润。
The difference between Chinese EV automakers and legacy automakers is Chinese automakers are not focused on profits, but volume whereas the legacy automakers are focused on profits and low volume EVs. In order for legacy to "catch up" they would need to go several years with no profits as they invest in the technology and scaling, but no CEO is willing to eliminate profits on their watch.
中国电动汽车制造商与传统汽车制造商的区别在于中国汽车制造商关注的不是利润而是销量，而传统汽车制造商关注的是利润。为了让传统汽车制造商“迎头赶上”，他们需要在技术和规模投资方面连续几年不盈利，但没有一位首席执行官愿意在自己的眼皮底下消灭利润。
@ElPsiCongroo
I think the cost difference between Chinese cars and global automakers is just several factors rather than one big one. There's a UBS analysis of the COGS for the BYD Seal vs the Volkswagen ID.3 that's very enlightening. It seems like the biggest absolute cost differences are from China's advantage in batteries, car supply chain and distribution, and raw materials (steel?).
我认为中国汽车与全球汽车制造商之间的成本差异有几个因素，而不是一个大的因素。瑞银对比亚迪海豹与大众 ID.3 的COGS分析很有启发。看起来，最大的绝对成本差异来自中国在电池、汽车供应链和分销以及原材料（钢铁？）
I think the cost difference between Chinese cars and global automakers is just several factors rather than one big one. There's a UBS analysis of the COGS for the BYD Seal vs the Volkswagen ID.3 that's very enlightening. It seems like the biggest absolute cost differences are from China's advantage in batteries, car supply chain and distribution, and raw materials (steel?).
我认为中国汽车与全球汽车制造商之间的成本差异有几个因素，而不是一个大的因素。瑞银对比亚迪海豹与大众 ID.3 的COGS分析很有启发。看起来，最大的绝对成本差异来自中国在电池、汽车供应链和分销以及原材料（钢铁？）
@cheungchingtong
It is battery technology, supply chain, distribution and AI/computer technology, which the first three are Chinese specialty, and the last one is almost monopolized by Chinese and Americans. That's why Japanese and German are suffering the most, lower cost won't win you everything, technology is the another key.
是电池技术、供应链、分销和人工智能/计算机技术，前三项都是中国特色，最后一项几乎被中国人和美国人垄断。这就是为什么日本人和德国人最痛苦的原因，低成本并不能赢得一切，技术才是另一个关键。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It is battery technology, supply chain, distribution and AI/computer technology, which the first three are Chinese specialty, and the last one is almost monopolized by Chinese and Americans. That's why Japanese and German are suffering the most, lower cost won't win you everything, technology is the another key.
是电池技术、供应链、分销和人工智能/计算机技术，前三项都是中国特色，最后一项几乎被中国人和美国人垄断。这就是为什么日本人和德国人最痛苦的原因，低成本并不能赢得一切，技术才是另一个关键。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@franksun4017
Especially steels. When it comes to steel, there is a province in China that out produces the rest of the country, and the rest of Chinese steel production out produces the next 8 countries in the world combined. Also worth mentioning that the so called giga pressing which first adopted by Tesla to make rear body of the cars, the machine is produced by an Italian company called IDRA which is a subsidiary of a bigger Chinese manufacturer that has 7 factories making pressing machines of different scales along the east coast of China.
尤其是钢。说到钢铁，中国有一个省的产量超过了全国其他地区，而中国其他地区的钢铁产量则超过了世界其他8个国家的总和。另外值得一提的是，特斯拉首先采用的用于制造汽车后车身的所谓千兆压铸机是由一家名为 IDRA 的意大利公司生产的，而该公司是一家更大的中国制造商的子公司，它在中国东海岸有7家工厂生产不同规模的压铸机。
Especially steels. When it comes to steel, there is a province in China that out produces the rest of the country, and the rest of Chinese steel production out produces the next 8 countries in the world combined. Also worth mentioning that the so called giga pressing which first adopted by Tesla to make rear body of the cars, the machine is produced by an Italian company called IDRA which is a subsidiary of a bigger Chinese manufacturer that has 7 factories making pressing machines of different scales along the east coast of China.
尤其是钢。说到钢铁，中国有一个省的产量超过了全国其他地区，而中国其他地区的钢铁产量则超过了世界其他8个国家的总和。另外值得一提的是，特斯拉首先采用的用于制造汽车后车身的所谓千兆压铸机是由一家名为 IDRA 的意大利公司生产的，而该公司是一家更大的中国制造商的子公司，它在中国东海岸有7家工厂生产不同规模的压铸机。
@unreliablenarrator6649
Chinese cars are not heavily subsidized. Do you really think the Chinese government can finance the largest car market in the world and exports? An accounting of BYD vs Tesla government funding suggest they are quite similar. What China has is a complete, tightly managed supply chain, lower cost of design and engineering, and a very competitive market. And, verses many US factories, a much higher level of automation - keep in mind Tesla Shanghai was where they got settled with local help and finally figured out manufacturing. If you go to China you should tour some factories, this will explain how Chinese manufactures at low cost more than 100 pundits yapping.
中国汽车没有大量补贴。你真的认为中国政府能为世界上最大的汽车市场和出口提供资金吗？对比亚迪和特斯拉的政府资助进行核算后发现，它们的情况非常相似。中国拥有的是完整、管理严格的供应链，较低的设计和工程成本，以及极具竞争力的市场。而且，与许多美国工厂相比，中国的自动化水平要高得多--要知道，特斯拉上海工厂就是在当地人的帮助下安顿下来并最终摸索出制造工艺的。如果你去中国，你应该参观一些工厂，这将解释中国是如何以低成本制造产品的，而不是 100 多位专家在喋喋不休。
Chinese cars are not heavily subsidized. Do you really think the Chinese government can finance the largest car market in the world and exports? An accounting of BYD vs Tesla government funding suggest they are quite similar. What China has is a complete, tightly managed supply chain, lower cost of design and engineering, and a very competitive market. And, verses many US factories, a much higher level of automation - keep in mind Tesla Shanghai was where they got settled with local help and finally figured out manufacturing. If you go to China you should tour some factories, this will explain how Chinese manufactures at low cost more than 100 pundits yapping.
中国汽车没有大量补贴。你真的认为中国政府能为世界上最大的汽车市场和出口提供资金吗？对比亚迪和特斯拉的政府资助进行核算后发现，它们的情况非常相似。中国拥有的是完整、管理严格的供应链，较低的设计和工程成本，以及极具竞争力的市场。而且，与许多美国工厂相比，中国的自动化水平要高得多--要知道，特斯拉上海工厂就是在当地人的帮助下安顿下来并最终摸索出制造工艺的。如果你去中国，你应该参观一些工厂，这将解释中国是如何以低成本制造产品的，而不是 100 多位专家在喋喋不休。
@azureactivedirectory
I was test driving at a few Chinese EV dealerships and became so impressed with all the specs & features that you get for so little money, so I asked “this is crazy. How do you guys make any money?” The sales person straight up answered “We don’t. Every player is losing money to try to get market share and it just becomes a race to see who’s got more cash”. Crazy to think that this is level of competition in the Chinese EV market while the US basically has Tesla & Rivian
我在几家中国电动车经销商处试驾电动车时，对花这么少的钱就能买到的所有规格和功能印象深刻，于是我问："这太疯狂了，你们是怎么赚钱的”？销售人员直截了当地回答："我们不赚钱。为了抢占市场份额，每家公司都在赔钱，这就变成了一场看谁的现金多的竞赛"。想想中国电动汽车市场的竞争水平就觉得疯狂，而美国基本上只有特斯拉和Rivian。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I was test driving at a few Chinese EV dealerships and became so impressed with all the specs & features that you get for so little money, so I asked “this is crazy. How do you guys make any money?” The sales person straight up answered “We don’t. Every player is losing money to try to get market share and it just becomes a race to see who’s got more cash”. Crazy to think that this is level of competition in the Chinese EV market while the US basically has Tesla & Rivian
我在几家中国电动车经销商处试驾电动车时，对花这么少的钱就能买到的所有规格和功能印象深刻，于是我问："这太疯狂了，你们是怎么赚钱的”？销售人员直截了当地回答："我们不赚钱。为了抢占市场份额，每家公司都在赔钱，这就变成了一场看谁的现金多的竞赛"。想想中国电动汽车市场的竞争水平就觉得疯狂，而美国基本上只有特斯拉和Rivian。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@nagi-springfield93
Not all are losing money, the biggest player byd currently has around 25% gross profit which is the highest compare to other big automaker right now. Li also making alot of profit with each car average earn around 20k rmb, normally its those smaller automaker that are losing money
并非所有企业都在亏损，最大的企业比亚迪目前的毛利润约为25%，与其他大型汽车制造商相比是最高的。理想的利润也很可观，平均每辆车能赚约2万人民币。
Not all are losing money, the biggest player byd currently has around 25% gross profit which is the highest compare to other big automaker right now. Li also making alot of profit with each car average earn around 20k rmb, normally its those smaller automaker that are losing money
并非所有企业都在亏损，最大的企业比亚迪目前的毛利润约为25%，与其他大型汽车制造商相比是最高的。理想的利润也很可观，平均每辆车能赚约2万人民币。
@zizimai7568
The dealers are not making much money but certainly not the manufacturers. The Chinese are way smarter in business than you think. If they are bad in business, the world won't be jumping everywhere they go.
经销商赚不了多少钱，但制造商肯定不会。中国人做生意比你想象的要聪明得多，如果他们的生意不好，世界也不会对他们所到之处感到兴奋。
The dealers are not making much money but certainly not the manufacturers. The Chinese are way smarter in business than you think. If they are bad in business, the world won't be jumping everywhere they go.
经销商赚不了多少钱，但制造商肯定不会。中国人做生意比你想象的要聪明得多，如果他们的生意不好，世界也不会对他们所到之处感到兴奋。
@frankiedehockie
All these Chinese cars show Americans that we are driving inferior vehicles.
I hope this humble us and begin to disabuse ourselves of the stereotypes around Chinese cars. Do not make the same mistake the past generation did with Japanese cars.
The future is becoming clear as we try to contend China. That is, the US will become a place with inferior products with high cost while China and the rest of the world enjoy superior products at lower cost. Hence, the quality of life in the US is about to decline. Homes prices are up, cars prices are up, electronics and other products prices are about to increase by 60% due to Trump tariffs.
所有这些中国汽车都让美国人看到，我们驾驶的是劣质汽车。
我希望这能让我们谦虚并开始消除对中国汽车的成见，不要重蹈上一代人对日本汽车的覆辙。
在我们努力与中国抗衡的过程中，未来已经变得越来越清晰。也就是说美国将成为一个产品低劣、成本高昂的地方，而中国和世界其他国家则能以较低的成本享受到优质产品。因此，美国的生活质量即将下降。房价上涨，汽车价格上涨，电子产品和其他产品的价格也将因特朗普关税而上涨60%。
All these Chinese cars show Americans that we are driving inferior vehicles.
I hope this humble us and begin to disabuse ourselves of the stereotypes around Chinese cars. Do not make the same mistake the past generation did with Japanese cars.
The future is becoming clear as we try to contend China. That is, the US will become a place with inferior products with high cost while China and the rest of the world enjoy superior products at lower cost. Hence, the quality of life in the US is about to decline. Homes prices are up, cars prices are up, electronics and other products prices are about to increase by 60% due to Trump tariffs.
所有这些中国汽车都让美国人看到，我们驾驶的是劣质汽车。
我希望这能让我们谦虚并开始消除对中国汽车的成见，不要重蹈上一代人对日本汽车的覆辙。
在我们努力与中国抗衡的过程中，未来已经变得越来越清晰。也就是说美国将成为一个产品低劣、成本高昂的地方，而中国和世界其他国家则能以较低的成本享受到优质产品。因此，美国的生活质量即将下降。房价上涨，汽车价格上涨，电子产品和其他产品的价格也将因特朗普关税而上涨60%。
@philipng476
Tesla Model 3 can only be categorized as compact vehicle if not sub-compact vehicle. However xiaomi SU7 is really a midsize vehicle lacking just additional trunk space to be categorized as full size sedan. So to be fair, xiaomi SU7 should be compared to Tesla Model S instead of Model 3. This is why people so amazed by the price of SU7.
特斯拉 Model 3 如果不是超紧凑型车，也只能归类为紧凑型车。但小米 SU7 确实是一款中型车，只是后备箱空间不足，无法归类为全尺寸轿车。因此，平心而论，小米 SU7 应该与特斯拉 Model S 而不是 Model 3 相提并论。这就是为什么人们对 SU7 的价格如此惊讶的原因。
Tesla Model 3 can only be categorized as compact vehicle if not sub-compact vehicle. However xiaomi SU7 is really a midsize vehicle lacking just additional trunk space to be categorized as full size sedan. So to be fair, xiaomi SU7 should be compared to Tesla Model S instead of Model 3. This is why people so amazed by the price of SU7.
特斯拉 Model 3 如果不是超紧凑型车，也只能归类为紧凑型车。但小米 SU7 确实是一款中型车，只是后备箱空间不足，无法归类为全尺寸轿车。因此，平心而论，小米 SU7 应该与特斯拉 Model S 而不是 Model 3 相提并论。这就是为什么人们对 SU7 的价格如此惊讶的原因。
@diydrivenGA
Wish the US would let this brand in. We love "free" markets in so far as the freedom benefits the owners of business, not the consumer.
The fact a phone company leapfrogged the decades of ICE development, likely looked at Tesla in China, and produced a car of this quality should be a clear sign to legacy to commit to EVs.
真希望美国能让这个品牌进来。我们喜欢“自由”市场，因为自由有利于企业主，而不是消费者。
事实上，一家手机公司跨越了几十年的内燃机汽车发展历程，很可能是借鉴了中国的特斯拉，并生产出了如此高品质的汽车，这应该是一个让传统企业致力于电动汽车的发展的明确的信号。
Wish the US would let this brand in. We love "free" markets in so far as the freedom benefits the owners of business, not the consumer.
The fact a phone company leapfrogged the decades of ICE development, likely looked at Tesla in China, and produced a car of this quality should be a clear sign to legacy to commit to EVs.
真希望美国能让这个品牌进来。我们喜欢“自由”市场，因为自由有利于企业主，而不是消费者。
事实上，一家手机公司跨越了几十年的内燃机汽车发展历程，很可能是借鉴了中国的特斯拉，并生产出了如此高品质的汽车，这应该是一个让传统企业致力于电动汽车的发展的明确的信号。
@simson4t
Free market only works when everybody Play on a level Play Field by the same rules. This isn't True when it comes to China. Do you want American auto workers work for 3000 USD per year ?
Western manufacturers fully committed to evs but customers don't.
只有当每个人都按照同样的规则公平竞争时，自由市场才能发挥作用。但对中国来说，这并不正确。你希望美国汽车工人年薪3000美元吗？
西方制造商全力投入电动汽车，但客户却不这么认为。
Free market only works when everybody Play on a level Play Field by the same rules. This isn't True when it comes to China. Do you want American auto workers work for 3000 USD per year ?
Western manufacturers fully committed to evs but customers don't.
只有当每个人都按照同样的规则公平竞争时，自由市场才能发挥作用。但对中国来说，这并不正确。你希望美国汽车工人年薪3000美元吗？
西方制造商全力投入电动汽车，但客户却不这么认为。
@ibrahim6960
The US cannot let the brand in. It would mean the death of US automakers and automakers who manufacture in the US. They simply cannot compete in price.
美国不能让该品牌进入，这将意味着美国汽车制造商和在美国生产的汽车制造商的死亡，因为他们在价格上根本无法竞争。
The US cannot let the brand in. It would mean the death of US automakers and automakers who manufacture in the US. They simply cannot compete in price.
美国不能让该品牌进入，这将意味着美国汽车制造商和在美国生产的汽车制造商的死亡，因为他们在价格上根本无法竞争。
@ibrahim6960
It’s not to get political. But most people don’t get it when Trump has been talking about the tariffs and without it what it does to the local US economy. Most consumers would buy the cheaper imported Chinese vehicles if given the chance and then cars produced in the US won’t sell enough. And it’s not just American companies but other foreign companies who have factories in the US will not be able to turn enough profit to keep their factories open. So there will be loss of jobs and the economy will take a hit. It has actually been taking a hit in other sectors for years.
这不是政治问题，但当特朗普谈论关税时，大多数人不明白没有关税会对美国本土经济造成什么影响。如果有机会，大多数消费者会购买更便宜的中国进口汽车，那么美国生产的汽车就卖不出去了。不仅是美国公司，其他在美国设厂的外国公司也将无法获得足够的利润来维持工厂的运营。因此，就业机会将减少，经济将受到打击。实际上，多年来其他行业的经济一直在遭受打击。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It’s not to get political. But most people don’t get it when Trump has been talking about the tariffs and without it what it does to the local US economy. Most consumers would buy the cheaper imported Chinese vehicles if given the chance and then cars produced in the US won’t sell enough. And it’s not just American companies but other foreign companies who have factories in the US will not be able to turn enough profit to keep their factories open. So there will be loss of jobs and the economy will take a hit. It has actually been taking a hit in other sectors for years.
这不是政治问题，但当特朗普谈论关税时，大多数人不明白没有关税会对美国本土经济造成什么影响。如果有机会，大多数消费者会购买更便宜的中国进口汽车，那么美国生产的汽车就卖不出去了。不仅是美国公司，其他在美国设厂的外国公司也将无法获得足够的利润来维持工厂的运营。因此，就业机会将减少，经济将受到打击。实际上，多年来其他行业的经济一直在遭受打击。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@ibrahim6960
That’s why when some people say Trump is lowering corporate tax to give his rich friends a break, they’re so wrong.
If you were xiaomi and you wanted to sell your car in the US but face 100% tariffs and then corporate tax decreases. It makes more sense to build a factory in the US, pay tax to the US government, employ large number of US based workers and have access to Canada, and the rest of the americas. The cars won’t be as cheap but they’ll be cheaper than with tariffs and competitively priced enough to give other companies in the US a competition whilst giving consumers options.
这就是为什么有人说特朗普降低企业税是为了给他的富人朋友们减负，他们错得离谱。
如果你是小米，你想在美国销售汽车，但面临100%的关税，然后企业税又降低了。更有意义的做法是在美国建厂，向美国政府纳税，雇佣大量美国工人，并能进入加拿大和美洲其他国家。这样生产出来的汽车虽然没有那么便宜，但会比征收关税时便宜，而且价格也有竞争力，足以让美国的其他公司参与竞争，同时也给消费者提供了选择。
That’s why when some people say Trump is lowering corporate tax to give his rich friends a break, they’re so wrong.
If you were xiaomi and you wanted to sell your car in the US but face 100% tariffs and then corporate tax decreases. It makes more sense to build a factory in the US, pay tax to the US government, employ large number of US based workers and have access to Canada, and the rest of the americas. The cars won’t be as cheap but they’ll be cheaper than with tariffs and competitively priced enough to give other companies in the US a competition whilst giving consumers options.
这就是为什么有人说特朗普降低企业税是为了给他的富人朋友们减负，他们错得离谱。
如果你是小米，你想在美国销售汽车，但面临100%的关税，然后企业税又降低了。更有意义的做法是在美国建厂，向美国政府纳税，雇佣大量美国工人，并能进入加拿大和美洲其他国家。这样生产出来的汽车虽然没有那么便宜，但会比征收关税时便宜，而且价格也有竞争力，足以让美国的其他公司参与竞争，同时也给消费者提供了选择。
@otm646
But you're not realizing is the Chinese are doing their usual thing and dumping product into the market. That's one of their core economic warfare concepts.
They are not making up the production cost differences simply on labor. These Chinese companies are not more efficient than Toyota. It all comes down to subsidies on the raw materials, power and real estate.
但你没有意识到中国人正在做他们惯常的做法：向市场倾销产品，这是他们的核心经济战理念之一。
他们并不是仅仅靠劳动力来弥补生产成本的差异。这些中国公司并不比丰田公司更有效率，这一切都归结于对原材料、电力和房地产的补贴。
But you're not realizing is the Chinese are doing their usual thing and dumping product into the market. That's one of their core economic warfare concepts.
They are not making up the production cost differences simply on labor. These Chinese companies are not more efficient than Toyota. It all comes down to subsidies on the raw materials, power and real estate.
但你没有意识到中国人正在做他们惯常的做法：向市场倾销产品，这是他们的核心经济战理念之一。
他们并不是仅仅靠劳动力来弥补生产成本的差异。这些中国公司并不比丰田公司更有效率，这一切都归结于对原材料、电力和房地产的补贴。
@BrianNedry
Thank you, Kyle, for doing this review of one of my dream cars to own. Yes, it's not perfect, but it's pretty damn close and quite an amazing feat for being xiaomi first attempt. Can't wait for more of your reviews with Chinese evs and i hope China rolls out the red carpet for you when you take a trip over there to review more cars. I would still expect you to be critical of any problems with each car but overall I think you might be throughly impressed and shocked by the affordability and features. What would I buy? $80k Dodge Daytona Ev or xiaomi Su7? Shout out to Wheelsboy and Inside China Auto for keeping me up-to-date on Chinese Evs.
谢谢你，凯尔，为我梦寐以求的汽车之一做了一个视频。是的，虽然它并不完美，但已经非常接近了。作为小米的首次尝试，这是一项了不起的壮举。我迫不及待地想看到你对中国电动汽车的更多评测，希望你去中国评测更多汽车时，中国能为你铺上红地毯。我仍然希望你能对每辆车的任何问题提出批评，但总体而言，我认为你可能会对它的经济性和功能留下深刻印象并感到震惊。我会买什么车？8万美元的道奇Daytona 还是小米Su7？感谢 Wheelsboy 和 Inside China Auto 为我提供中国电动汽车的最新信息。
Thank you, Kyle, for doing this review of one of my dream cars to own. Yes, it's not perfect, but it's pretty damn close and quite an amazing feat for being xiaomi first attempt. Can't wait for more of your reviews with Chinese evs and i hope China rolls out the red carpet for you when you take a trip over there to review more cars. I would still expect you to be critical of any problems with each car but overall I think you might be throughly impressed and shocked by the affordability and features. What would I buy? $80k Dodge Daytona Ev or xiaomi Su7? Shout out to Wheelsboy and Inside China Auto for keeping me up-to-date on Chinese Evs.
谢谢你，凯尔，为我梦寐以求的汽车之一做了一个视频。是的，虽然它并不完美，但已经非常接近了。作为小米的首次尝试，这是一项了不起的壮举。我迫不及待地想看到你对中国电动汽车的更多评测，希望你去中国评测更多汽车时，中国能为你铺上红地毯。我仍然希望你能对每辆车的任何问题提出批评，但总体而言，我认为你可能会对它的经济性和功能留下深刻印象并感到震惊。我会买什么车？8万美元的道奇Daytona 还是小米Su7？感谢 Wheelsboy 和 Inside China Auto 为我提供中国电动汽车的最新信息。
@vitoponzio2234
Wow, government supported industries! The US, EU and Japan have never done that to corner a market. Luckily tRump has the answer, tariffs [sigh]. Never mind that they've never worked long-term, and punishes the consumer. Ah real capitalism, oh how I miss you. Basically what's happened here is that the student (China) has outpaced the teacher (the US & EU) and we're clutching our pearls. Like your parents used to tell you, 'be careful for what you wish for'. Well the West wanted China to embrace capitalism and boy did they.
哇，政府支持的产业！美国、欧盟和日本从未这样做来占领市场。幸运的是特朗普有了答案--关税[叹气]。别忘了，关税从来没有长期有效过，而且会惩罚消费者。啊，真正的资本主义，哦，我多么想念你。从根本上说，现在的情况是学生（中国）超过了老师（美国和欧盟），而我们正在紧紧抓住我们的珍珠。就像你父母常跟你说的那样，“小心驶得万年船”。西方希望中国拥抱资本主义，现在他们做到了。
Wow, government supported industries! The US, EU and Japan have never done that to corner a market. Luckily tRump has the answer, tariffs [sigh]. Never mind that they've never worked long-term, and punishes the consumer. Ah real capitalism, oh how I miss you. Basically what's happened here is that the student (China) has outpaced the teacher (the US & EU) and we're clutching our pearls. Like your parents used to tell you, 'be careful for what you wish for'. Well the West wanted China to embrace capitalism and boy did they.
哇，政府支持的产业！美国、欧盟和日本从未这样做来占领市场。幸运的是特朗普有了答案--关税[叹气]。别忘了，关税从来没有长期有效过，而且会惩罚消费者。啊，真正的资本主义，哦，我多么想念你。从根本上说，现在的情况是学生（中国）超过了老师（美国和欧盟），而我们正在紧紧抓住我们的珍珠。就像你父母常跟你说的那样，“小心驶得万年船”。西方希望中国拥抱资本主义，现在他们做到了。
@timoliver8940
Come to the U.K. where we have no tariffs on Chinese EV’s and TBH you don’t see that many of the non SAIC/ MG brands or Geely/ Volvo Polestar or Smart and all of those brands have one thing in common - they are (wrongly) perceived to be European manufacturers. There are not thousands and thousands of Xomi’s , BYD’s or Nio cars taking over here so what are the American manufacturers worried about? We have a bigger problem with electric buses and coaches which are almost all BYD sub-brands (virtually any electric “London” bus or electric black cab you travel in is Chinese made and nobody bats an eyelid). The most popular Chinese made car by far here is of course a Tesla…………
来英国，我们没有对中国电动汽车征收关税，而且说实话，你看不到那么多的非上汽/名爵品牌或吉利/沃尔沃的极星或Smart品牌，而所有这些品牌都有一个共同点--它们被（错误地）认为是欧洲制造商。这里没有成千上万辆小米、比亚迪或蔚来汽车，那么美国制造商在担心什么呢？我们面临的更大问题是电动巴士和长途客车，它们几乎都是比亚迪的子品牌（你乘坐的几乎所有电动“伦敦”巴士或电动黑色出租车都是中国制造的，没有人对此高看一眼）。到目前为止，在这里最受欢迎的中国制造的汽车当然是特斯拉........
Come to the U.K. where we have no tariffs on Chinese EV’s and TBH you don’t see that many of the non SAIC/ MG brands or Geely/ Volvo Polestar or Smart and all of those brands have one thing in common - they are (wrongly) perceived to be European manufacturers. There are not thousands and thousands of Xomi’s , BYD’s or Nio cars taking over here so what are the American manufacturers worried about? We have a bigger problem with electric buses and coaches which are almost all BYD sub-brands (virtually any electric “London” bus or electric black cab you travel in is Chinese made and nobody bats an eyelid). The most popular Chinese made car by far here is of course a Tesla…………
来英国，我们没有对中国电动汽车征收关税，而且说实话，你看不到那么多的非上汽/名爵品牌或吉利/沃尔沃的极星或Smart品牌，而所有这些品牌都有一个共同点--它们被（错误地）认为是欧洲制造商。这里没有成千上万辆小米、比亚迪或蔚来汽车，那么美国制造商在担心什么呢？我们面临的更大问题是电动巴士和长途客车，它们几乎都是比亚迪的子品牌（你乘坐的几乎所有电动“伦敦”巴士或电动黑色出租车都是中国制造的，没有人对此高看一眼）。到目前为止，在这里最受欢迎的中国制造的汽车当然是特斯拉........
很赞 12
收藏