中国是如何如此迅速地建立起强大的军事力量的？
正文翻译
图
图
评论翻译
@bengong4383
China has come a long way in a very short time. It’s really amazing!
中国在很短的时间内取得了长足的进步，真的很了不起！
@mamacryright5740
The China's speed is extrodinary magnificent ....
中国速度超乎寻常的惊人 ....
@kimpark283
The real master race
这是真正的高手过招。
@blenke1
When you copy everything , it's not really amazing....
当你复制一切的时候，这其实并不神奇....
@mamacryright5740
@blenke1 like hypersonic missiles?
比如高超音速导弹？
@GaryMoh-pc7cy
@blenke1 Is it????
China is a global leader in many technologies, including:
(1) Digital technologies: China is a leader in emerging digital technologies like 5G, AI, IoT, and blockchain. China's digital economy is worth 30% of its GDP.
(2)Electric vehicles and batteries: China is a global leader in electric vehicles and batteries.
(3)Commercial nuclear power: China is a global leader in commercial nuclear power.
(4) Renewable energy: China holds 29% of the world's renewable energy patents.
(5) Science and technology clusters: China has two of the world's top five science and technology clusters.
(6) Research output: China has seven universities or institutions in the global top ten for research output. And this is most impressive of all, China is the only one nation that has seven universities or institutions in the global top ten for research output. Therefore no nation in this world can compete with China & that include the US in this category.
Lastly because of all the above, Americans started sanctions, increase tariff against Chinese goods export to US, spreading lies & BS to downgrade China's reputation etc. But all these will not hurt China.
Most Americans instead of looking at Why China is growing so fast & try to compete with China, but the only thing they did were spilling BS all over the internet, so childish!!!��������
@blenke1 是吗????？
中国在许多技术领域处于全球领先地位，包括：
(1）数字技术： 中国在 5G、人工智能、物联网和区块链等新兴数字技术领域处于领先地位，中国的数字经济价值占其GDP的30%。
(2) 电动汽车和电池： 中国在电动汽车和电池领域处于全球领先地位。
(3) 商业核电： 中国在商用核能领域处于全球领先地位。
(4) 可再生能源： 中国拥有全球29%的可再生能源专利。
(5) 科技集群： 中国拥有世界五大科技集群中的两个。
(6) 科研产出： 中国有七所大学或机构的研究成果进入全球前十名。
最令人印象深刻的是，中国是唯一一个有七所大学或机构进入全球科研产出前十名的国家。因此，世界上没有任何一个国家能在这一领域与中国竞争，美国也不例外。
最后，由于上述种种原因，美国人开始制裁中国，对中国出口到美国的商品增加关税，散布谎言和胡说八道以降低中国的声誉等等，但所有这些都不会伤害到中国。
大多数美国人不去看为什么中国发展如此之快，也不去尝试与中国竞争，他们唯一做的就是在互联网上到处散布谣言，太幼稚了！！！
@GaryMoh-pc7cy
@blenke1 BTW China has at least two type of hypersonic missiles, the first one the land based DF-17 Hypersonic Glide Vehicle, & the 2nd hypersonic missile is the ship-based YJ-21 hypersonic missile on the Type-055 Large Destroyer, which has cruising speed at Mach 6, terminal speed before reaching the target at Mach 10.
And lastly there is DF-27 which is still very secretive, no confirmation or any detail about it, but rumour has it that it is a longer range version of DF-17 and could reach Guam from China.
BTW US is the only super power without any operational hypersonic missile, even the Russian has their own hypersonic missile, called the Zircon hypersonic missile.
@blenke1 顺便说一下，中国至少有两种高超音速导弹，第一种是陆基DF-17高超音速滑翔飞行器，第二种高超音速导弹是055型大型驱逐舰上的舰载YJ-21高超音速导弹，其巡航速度为6马赫，到达目标前的末端速度为10马赫。
最后还有DF-27，该导弹仍处于保密状态，没有得到证实，也没有任何细节，但有传言称它是DF-17的长程版，可以从中国飞抵关岛。
美国是唯一没有高超音速导弹的超级大国，即使俄罗斯也有自己的高超音速导弹，名为“锆石”高超音速导弹。
@raptorlondon
@blenke1 If copy is really that easy, how come only China can do it?
@blenke1 如果复制真的那么容易，为什么只有中国能做到？
@peanut0brain
@blenke1 copy things that you don't have like 6g? There are many more.
@blenke1 抄袭你没有的东西，比如6G？还有很多例子。
@mtm2906
Don't expect Americans have critical thinking.
别指望美国人有批判性思维。
@stephenleung9189
@blenke1 China’s scientific and technological development is years ahead of the West, there is nothing worth copying from them anymore.
@blenke1 中国的科技发展领先西方很多年，西方已经没有什么值得抄袭的了。
@siewkonsum7291
Chinese Navy is going places to maintain the status quo of freedom in maritime navigation all over the World.
中国海军为维护世界海上航行自由的现状而四处奔波。
@RKZX2
They still have a long way to go to catch up to the US in carriers. They have 13 with another in about 4 years (Enterprise)
要想在航母数量上赶上美国，他们还有很长的路要走。大约4年内，美国将拥有13艘航母。
@archangel0137
@RKZX2 China is a MUCH BIGGER country and has more manpower. Eventually, they'll have more than 13 aircraft carriers. It's just a matter of time...
@RKZX2 中国是一个更大的国家，它拥有更多的人力。最终，他们将拥有超过13艘航母，这只是时间问题...
@enzoh7763
@RKZX2 ,
Try making a count , how many incoming munitions could a carrier group give up before it run out of defense ?
Israel vaunted iron dome is shattered .
Iran was just using obsolete cruise missiles.
试着算一算，一个航母战斗群在防空能力耗尽之前能抵挡多少来袭弹药？
以色列引以为豪的铁穹防御系统被击碎了。
伊朗使用只是过时的巡航导弹。
@colberthunter12
@enzoh7763 those are defensive steps, when added to the offensive capabilities and the laws of attrition the west will win.
@enzoh7763 这些都是防御措施，如果再加上进攻能力和消耗法则，西方必胜。
@enzoh7763
@colberthunter12 when your love ones died for a cause that doesn’t help you and your family ,
Thats not a win .
Thats not only a loss ,
Thats a very deep personal loss ,
That is the normal among people who aren't egotistical .
当你所爱的人因为一个对你和你的家人没有帮助的事业而死去时，这不是胜利。这不仅是一种损失，更是一种非常深刻的个人损失，这是不自负的人的正常现象。
@greengrowthcam7723
Congratulations China for the modernisation of all development
祝贺中国实现现代化发展。
@aikteongyeap3774
Two can play t same game. When yr game is freedom of navigation in pacific, now u r worried about others maintaining freedom of navigation in t atlantic.
两个人可以玩同一个游戏。当你的游戏是在太平洋的自由航行时，现在你却担心别人在大西洋维护航行自由。
@arfajob4246
Don't be silly, China is not trying to control the Atlantic. That puddle is just too big. ����
别傻了，中国并不想控制大西洋，那个水坑实在太大了。
@raymondchan7839
Have to show others what we got, or else no one will care what we say. This is life nowadays.
必须让别人看看我们的本事，否则就没人在乎我们说什么了，这就是现在的生活。
@folag
Here's an awkward fact -- in the absence of any shipyards of consequence in the US, the Navy is already having difficulty maintaining its fleet. It's seeking arrangements for Korean shipyards to do the job. On the other hand, China's shipyards now produce more than half of all new ocean-going vessels globally. Go figure.
这里有一个尴尬的事实--在美国没有任何造船厂的情况下，美国海军已经很难维护其舰队，美国正在寻求安排韩国造船厂来完成这项工作。另一方面，中国造船厂现在生产的新式远洋船只占全球总量的一半以上。想想看。
@4-SeasonNature
China's primary obxtive is to maintain national security along its land and maritime borders.
中国的首要目标是维护其陆地和海洋边界的国家安全。
@leecheelek
The Return of the Ming Fleet in the 21st Century to explore other continents, new passageways for trade, establish diplomatic ties, increase trade, protection against pirates, cultural exchanges etc.
这是明朝舰队在21世纪的回归，探索其他大陆、新的贸易通道、建立外交关系、增加贸易、抵御海盗、文化交流等。
@lawrencechin3400
China must upgrade its military might, with more drills and coordination. China will never be humiliated again by powerful foreign nations, especially USA, Canada, UK, South Korea, Japan, Australia, Philippines, NATO, etc.
中国必须提升军事实力，加强演习和协调。中国绝不能再被外国列强羞辱，尤其是美国、加拿大、英国、韩国、日本、澳大利亚、菲律宾、北约等。
@peanut0brain
Powerful?! They were "powerful" because they had guns and gun boats back then. Now everyone has similar toys
强大？他们“强大”是因为他们当时有枪和炮艇，现在每个人都有类似的玩具
@craig4867
Don't complain about China, you buy their products don't you, cell phones, computers, shoes, clothes, tools you name it, you buy it! Don't you!
不要抱怨中国，你不是买了他们的产品吗？手机、电脑、鞋子、衣服、工具，你说得出来的，你都买了！难道不是吗？
@colberthunter12
We can transfer those products to other countries and continue to buy them.
我们可以把这些产品转移到其他国家，然后继续购买。
@weikwanglee4383
Surpassed? China fundamentally do not have the need of global control. Hence, US built in deficiency compared to China is from square one.
Cost of labour and cost of parts are higher in US due to US high standards of living and the coming failures of the US$.
This makes nonsense the allowed US$ military budget , cutting into US ability to sustain present military international net model.
Increasingly US money is spend on propping up existing operations rather than renewing apparatus and training personnels.
Cost and work ethics evolving in the US society also drags down US powerness.
The demographics of US personnels have moved from a clear US white dominance with clear one unity to a racial questionable composition with damaging hierarchal loyalties and inner frictions.
US hegemony is no longer sustainable.
This is also the inabilities of recent US elected and appointed in the last administrations lacking the understanding of their actual roles.
Liken to assuming power in office, pressing the lights on switch when no lights came on , and having no ideas why or how to fix things, nor how to upkeep this function.
Just doing the motion and moving on.
In long term, no one in place knows what to do. As the entire hierarchy was replaced by elected and appointed politicrats who knew nothing about how their office works.
Only to bark commands and expect everyone to obey.
Nay. uS military is not going to do well.
超越？ 中国从根本上说不需要全球部署。因此，美国与中国相比的内在缺陷是从一开始的。由于美国生活水平高，美元即将贬值，因此美国的劳动力成本和零部件成本较高。
这使得允许的美元军事预算变得毫无意义，削弱了美国维持现有国际军事网络模式的能力。
越来越多的美国资金被用于支持现有的行动，而不是更新设备和培训人员。
美国社会不断演变的成本和工作伦理也拖累了美国的实力。
美国的人口构成已经从美国白人占主导地位、团结一致的局面转变为种族构成存在问题、等级忠诚度破坏和内部摩擦不断的局面。
美国的霸权不再具有可持续性。
这也是美国最近几届政府中当选和被任命的人缺乏对自己实际角色的认识的原因。
这就好比上台掌权后，按下电灯开关却发现灯不亮，他既不知道为什么，也不知道如何解决问题，更不知道如何维持这一职能。
只是做做动作，然后继续前进。
从长远来看，没有人知道该做什么，因为整个等级制度都被民选和任命的政客所取代，他们对自己的办公室是如何运作的一无所知。
他们只知道发号施令，指望所有人都服从。
是的，美国军队不会做得很好。
@Jemmy_BengkelKu
Why? Because they sick of west gank bullying they always make an repressed to other week country
为什么？因为他们厌倦了西方的欺凌，西方总是对其他国家进行压制。
@stephenleung9189
China needs only about 6 aircraft carriers which they shall have by 2030, the Chinese navy is for defence purpose, not for invading and controlling the world. If any country is foolish enough to invade China, they will face not only Chinese naval forces, they will also have to consider the coastal defence forces and from the outer islands. The US has only 7 fleets, thus only 7 or 8 serviceable carriers which are stationed all over the world. Some of those are really museum pieces, relics from WWII.
中国只需要大约6艘航母，到2030年他们就会拥有这些航母，中国海军是用来防御的，而不是用来侵略和控制世界的。如果任何国家愚蠢到入侵中国，他们面对的将不仅仅是中国海军，他们还必须考虑沿海的防御力量和外围岛屿。美国只有7个舰队，因此只有7或8艘可用的航空母舰驻扎在世界各地。这些航母中的一些确实是博物馆里的珍品，是二战时期的遗物。
@colberthunter12
So they will be sitting around doing nothing, good to hear, America however will still be using our carriers to same way.
所以它们将无所事事，很高兴听到这个消息，不过美国仍将以同样的方式使用我们的航母。
@colberthunter12
Unlike C junk, America's old carriers are still the best, by the way we just finished building 2 new ones with more to come.
与C垃圾航母不同，美国的旧式航母仍然是最好的，顺便说一下，我们刚刚建造了两艘新航母，而且还会建造更多。
@steventan2550
This is certainly good news for those involved in military equipment manufacturing in the US.
这对在美国从事军事装备制造的人来说无疑是个好消息。
@SaorAlba1970
America has only 2 out of it's 11 supercarriers in active status , the USA has a massive maintenance problem and the assault carriers has similar problems like USS boxer last in service in 2019, it won't be in service again until the end of 2026 and the USS Gerry Ford is already in dock for maintenance
美国的11艘超级航母中只有2艘处于现役状态，美国存在一个巨大的维修问题，攻击型航母也有类似的问题，比如拳师号航母上一次服役是在2019年，它要到2026年底才能再次服役，而格里-福特号航母已经进坞维修了。
@ongsengkee2530
The west should allow China the space to grow and develop. Don't forget that Mao Zedong once said that China couldn't even lob a potato into space what more to threaten other countries. Therefore the west need not have sleepless nights about lobbing potatoes or even tomatoes.
西方应该给中国发展壮大的空间。别忘了，毛泽东曾说过中国连向太空发射一个土豆都做不到，何谈威胁其他国家。因此，西方不必为发射土豆甚至西红柿而寝食难安。
@Mr-hn2bp
ZhuHai Sir Show has been officially renamed as China Air Show.
珠海航展正式更名为中国航展。
@sandpaper4483
You know military spending is what made the ussr fall aprt
要知道军费开支才是苏联垮台的根本原因。
@twilight6460
And it will make the usa fall apart too
它也会让美国分崩离析。
@BrandyHeng007
China 1000 battle ships and submarines vs US 500 nos
中国1000艘战舰和潜艇VS美国500艘。
@RommelGonzales-ke6we
Still made in China lol. USA is good quality
它们仍然是中国制造，笑死我了。美国的质量更好。
@karkisunil3652
We should learn from history, all foreign invasion has hit hard to our country vie maritime combat. We have made great wall but forgot at sea ... now we are making an another wall at sea .....
我们应该以史为鉴，所有的外国入侵都是通过海上来的，对我国造成了沉重的打击。我们筑起了长城，却忘了海上......现在，我们又在海上筑起了一道长城 ....
@Mr-hn2bp
Zhenghe's fleet was big and strong but didn't bully any country nor colonized any.
郑和的舰队很强大，但是他没有欺负过任何国家，也没有殖民过任何国家。
@bchilenje
What would you do if you were China, being surrounded by so many US military bases in your neighborhood?
如果你是中国，周边有这么多美军基地，你会怎么做？
@MASMIWA
Missing from the conversation is China's missile force and army vs the US, Also missing was nothing about submarines, destroyers, frigates, corvettes, LSD, underwater drones, airborne drones, and special forces.
对话中没有提到中国的导弹部队和陆军与美国的对比，也没有提到潜艇、驱逐舰、护卫舰、轻型护卫舰、防空导弹、水下无人机、机载无人机和特种部队。
@karchi12
Does China has the rights to expand her military presence to any parts of the pacific as does the US.?The answer is YES!!
中国是否有权像美国一样将军事力量扩展到太平洋的任何地区？
@stephenleung9189
It looks like it is the US that’s playing catch-up to the Chinese military equipment now. Too bad they don’t have the money and labour force anymore to be competitive enough. They are way behind in ultra sonic missiles and military drones where such weapons are essential to modern warfare. They are still hung up with their WWII relic fleets. They are supposed to have 7 navel fleets, in reality, how many fully equipped and functional fleets can they assemble? 4, or maybe 5?
现在看来是美国在追赶中国的军事装备，可惜他们已经没有足够的资金和劳动力来提高竞争力了。他们在超音速导弹和军用无人机方面远远落后，而这些武器对于现代战争来说是必不可少的。他们仍然沉迷于二战遗留的舰队，他们应该拥有7支海军舰队，但实际上他们能组建多少支装备齐全、功能完善的舰队？4支还是5支？
@raymondancheta2998
I hope that China will triple the number of carriers that they build. STANDING with China.....ALWAYS!!
我希望中国建造的航母数量能增加三倍，我永远与中国站在一起！！！
@COLLAPSE.of.US.ECONOMY
China must take back its island province, Taiwan, as soon as possible.
中国必须尽快收回其岛屿省份台湾（地区）。
@eewinstorn4122
What your channel know is only a small portion. China now have many unseen high tech weapons not reveal yet and only use in times of war
你们频道知道的只是一小部分，中国现在有许多尚未曝光的高科技武器，而且只会在战争时期使用。
@andrewcbartlett
Economically China relies on the USA so will not risk a conflict.
中国在经济上依赖美国，因此不会冒险与美国发生冲突。
@jessicayoung1190
China only export 15% to US . China does not depends on US at all .
中国只向美国出口15%的产品，中国根本不依赖美国。
@ms1crash
War is privileged ppl's game. Weapons are their toys. I just hope power is balanced so the world is peachful. We normal ppl can live a life
战争是特权阶层的游戏，武器是他们的玩具，我只希望权力平衡，世界和平，我们普通人也能过上好日子。
@billyjoesmo8251
China's tanks could fire seven times before the barrel warps causing it to explode�� Malamar and North Korea are the only countries that buy Chinese weapons and they complained that they don't work or their dangerous to the people using them��
中国的坦克可以开七炮，然后炮管就会翘起来导致爆炸。缅甸和朝鲜是唯一购买中国武器的国家，他们抱怨这些武器不能用或者对使用这些武器的人有危险。
@BravoCheesecake
Yes they don't even use Collimator's on their tanks because they know it's pointless to even try to prevent warping Chinese poor quality barrels.
是的，他们甚至不在坦克上使用准直器，因为他们知道即使试图防止中国劣质炮管翘曲也毫无意义。
@yuyu-zr8dn
至少中国试射的洲际导弹是成功，而不象美国导弹还要试射两次，才能证明自己，另外，中国空间站上宇航员是可以按计划回家休假！
@donaldddtrump6663
看来我们的航母还是不够多，当我们拥有20艘航母以后你们就会知道我们才是和平守护者
China has come a long way in a very short time. It’s really amazing!
中国在很短的时间内取得了长足的进步，真的很了不起！
@mamacryright5740
The China's speed is extrodinary magnificent ....
中国速度超乎寻常的惊人 ....
@kimpark283
The real master race
这是真正的高手过招。
@blenke1
When you copy everything , it's not really amazing....
当你复制一切的时候，这其实并不神奇....
@mamacryright5740
@blenke1 like hypersonic missiles?
比如高超音速导弹？
@GaryMoh-pc7cy
@blenke1 Is it????
China is a global leader in many technologies, including:
(1) Digital technologies: China is a leader in emerging digital technologies like 5G, AI, IoT, and blockchain. China's digital economy is worth 30% of its GDP.
(2)Electric vehicles and batteries: China is a global leader in electric vehicles and batteries.
(3)Commercial nuclear power: China is a global leader in commercial nuclear power.
(4) Renewable energy: China holds 29% of the world's renewable energy patents.
(5) Science and technology clusters: China has two of the world's top five science and technology clusters.
(6) Research output: China has seven universities or institutions in the global top ten for research output. And this is most impressive of all, China is the only one nation that has seven universities or institutions in the global top ten for research output. Therefore no nation in this world can compete with China & that include the US in this category.
Lastly because of all the above, Americans started sanctions, increase tariff against Chinese goods export to US, spreading lies & BS to downgrade China's reputation etc. But all these will not hurt China.
Most Americans instead of looking at Why China is growing so fast & try to compete with China, but the only thing they did were spilling BS all over the internet, so childish!!!��������
@blenke1 是吗????？
中国在许多技术领域处于全球领先地位，包括：
(1）数字技术： 中国在 5G、人工智能、物联网和区块链等新兴数字技术领域处于领先地位，中国的数字经济价值占其GDP的30%。
(2) 电动汽车和电池： 中国在电动汽车和电池领域处于全球领先地位。
(3) 商业核电： 中国在商用核能领域处于全球领先地位。
(4) 可再生能源： 中国拥有全球29%的可再生能源专利。
(5) 科技集群： 中国拥有世界五大科技集群中的两个。
(6) 科研产出： 中国有七所大学或机构的研究成果进入全球前十名。
最令人印象深刻的是，中国是唯一一个有七所大学或机构进入全球科研产出前十名的国家。因此，世界上没有任何一个国家能在这一领域与中国竞争，美国也不例外。
最后，由于上述种种原因，美国人开始制裁中国，对中国出口到美国的商品增加关税，散布谎言和胡说八道以降低中国的声誉等等，但所有这些都不会伤害到中国。
大多数美国人不去看为什么中国发展如此之快，也不去尝试与中国竞争，他们唯一做的就是在互联网上到处散布谣言，太幼稚了！！！
@GaryMoh-pc7cy
@blenke1 BTW China has at least two type of hypersonic missiles, the first one the land based DF-17 Hypersonic Glide Vehicle, & the 2nd hypersonic missile is the ship-based YJ-21 hypersonic missile on the Type-055 Large Destroyer, which has cruising speed at Mach 6, terminal speed before reaching the target at Mach 10.
And lastly there is DF-27 which is still very secretive, no confirmation or any detail about it, but rumour has it that it is a longer range version of DF-17 and could reach Guam from China.
BTW US is the only super power without any operational hypersonic missile, even the Russian has their own hypersonic missile, called the Zircon hypersonic missile.
@blenke1 顺便说一下，中国至少有两种高超音速导弹，第一种是陆基DF-17高超音速滑翔飞行器，第二种高超音速导弹是055型大型驱逐舰上的舰载YJ-21高超音速导弹，其巡航速度为6马赫，到达目标前的末端速度为10马赫。
最后还有DF-27，该导弹仍处于保密状态，没有得到证实，也没有任何细节，但有传言称它是DF-17的长程版，可以从中国飞抵关岛。
美国是唯一没有高超音速导弹的超级大国，即使俄罗斯也有自己的高超音速导弹，名为“锆石”高超音速导弹。
@raptorlondon
@blenke1 If copy is really that easy, how come only China can do it?
@blenke1 如果复制真的那么容易，为什么只有中国能做到？
@peanut0brain
@blenke1 copy things that you don't have like 6g? There are many more.
@blenke1 抄袭你没有的东西，比如6G？还有很多例子。
@mtm2906
Don't expect Americans have critical thinking.
别指望美国人有批判性思维。
@stephenleung9189
@blenke1 China’s scientific and technological development is years ahead of the West, there is nothing worth copying from them anymore.
@blenke1 中国的科技发展领先西方很多年，西方已经没有什么值得抄袭的了。
@siewkonsum7291
Chinese Navy is going places to maintain the status quo of freedom in maritime navigation all over the World.
中国海军为维护世界海上航行自由的现状而四处奔波。
@RKZX2
They still have a long way to go to catch up to the US in carriers. They have 13 with another in about 4 years (Enterprise)
要想在航母数量上赶上美国，他们还有很长的路要走。大约4年内，美国将拥有13艘航母。
@archangel0137
@RKZX2 China is a MUCH BIGGER country and has more manpower. Eventually, they'll have more than 13 aircraft carriers. It's just a matter of time...
@RKZX2 中国是一个更大的国家，它拥有更多的人力。最终，他们将拥有超过13艘航母，这只是时间问题...
@enzoh7763
@RKZX2 ,
Try making a count , how many incoming munitions could a carrier group give up before it run out of defense ?
Israel vaunted iron dome is shattered .
Iran was just using obsolete cruise missiles.
试着算一算，一个航母战斗群在防空能力耗尽之前能抵挡多少来袭弹药？
以色列引以为豪的铁穹防御系统被击碎了。
伊朗使用只是过时的巡航导弹。
@colberthunter12
@enzoh7763 those are defensive steps, when added to the offensive capabilities and the laws of attrition the west will win.
@enzoh7763 这些都是防御措施，如果再加上进攻能力和消耗法则，西方必胜。
@enzoh7763
@colberthunter12 when your love ones died for a cause that doesn’t help you and your family ,
Thats not a win .
Thats not only a loss ,
Thats a very deep personal loss ,
That is the normal among people who aren't egotistical .
当你所爱的人因为一个对你和你的家人没有帮助的事业而死去时，这不是胜利。这不仅是一种损失，更是一种非常深刻的个人损失，这是不自负的人的正常现象。
@greengrowthcam7723
Congratulations China for the modernisation of all development
祝贺中国实现现代化发展。
@aikteongyeap3774
Two can play t same game. When yr game is freedom of navigation in pacific, now u r worried about others maintaining freedom of navigation in t atlantic.
两个人可以玩同一个游戏。当你的游戏是在太平洋的自由航行时，现在你却担心别人在大西洋维护航行自由。
@arfajob4246
Don't be silly, China is not trying to control the Atlantic. That puddle is just too big. ����
别傻了，中国并不想控制大西洋，那个水坑实在太大了。
@raymondchan7839
Have to show others what we got, or else no one will care what we say. This is life nowadays.
必须让别人看看我们的本事，否则就没人在乎我们说什么了，这就是现在的生活。
@folag
Here's an awkward fact -- in the absence of any shipyards of consequence in the US, the Navy is already having difficulty maintaining its fleet. It's seeking arrangements for Korean shipyards to do the job. On the other hand, China's shipyards now produce more than half of all new ocean-going vessels globally. Go figure.
这里有一个尴尬的事实--在美国没有任何造船厂的情况下，美国海军已经很难维护其舰队，美国正在寻求安排韩国造船厂来完成这项工作。另一方面，中国造船厂现在生产的新式远洋船只占全球总量的一半以上。想想看。
@4-SeasonNature
China's primary obxtive is to maintain national security along its land and maritime borders.
中国的首要目标是维护其陆地和海洋边界的国家安全。
@leecheelek
The Return of the Ming Fleet in the 21st Century to explore other continents, new passageways for trade, establish diplomatic ties, increase trade, protection against pirates, cultural exchanges etc.
这是明朝舰队在21世纪的回归，探索其他大陆、新的贸易通道、建立外交关系、增加贸易、抵御海盗、文化交流等。
@lawrencechin3400
China must upgrade its military might, with more drills and coordination. China will never be humiliated again by powerful foreign nations, especially USA, Canada, UK, South Korea, Japan, Australia, Philippines, NATO, etc.
中国必须提升军事实力，加强演习和协调。中国绝不能再被外国列强羞辱，尤其是美国、加拿大、英国、韩国、日本、澳大利亚、菲律宾、北约等。
@peanut0brain
Powerful?! They were "powerful" because they had guns and gun boats back then. Now everyone has similar toys
强大？他们“强大”是因为他们当时有枪和炮艇，现在每个人都有类似的玩具
@craig4867
Don't complain about China, you buy their products don't you, cell phones, computers, shoes, clothes, tools you name it, you buy it! Don't you!
不要抱怨中国，你不是买了他们的产品吗？手机、电脑、鞋子、衣服、工具，你说得出来的，你都买了！难道不是吗？
@colberthunter12
We can transfer those products to other countries and continue to buy them.
我们可以把这些产品转移到其他国家，然后继续购买。
@weikwanglee4383
Surpassed? China fundamentally do not have the need of global control. Hence, US built in deficiency compared to China is from square one.
Cost of labour and cost of parts are higher in US due to US high standards of living and the coming failures of the US$.
This makes nonsense the allowed US$ military budget , cutting into US ability to sustain present military international net model.
Increasingly US money is spend on propping up existing operations rather than renewing apparatus and training personnels.
Cost and work ethics evolving in the US society also drags down US powerness.
The demographics of US personnels have moved from a clear US white dominance with clear one unity to a racial questionable composition with damaging hierarchal loyalties and inner frictions.
US hegemony is no longer sustainable.
This is also the inabilities of recent US elected and appointed in the last administrations lacking the understanding of their actual roles.
Liken to assuming power in office, pressing the lights on switch when no lights came on , and having no ideas why or how to fix things, nor how to upkeep this function.
Just doing the motion and moving on.
In long term, no one in place knows what to do. As the entire hierarchy was replaced by elected and appointed politicrats who knew nothing about how their office works.
Only to bark commands and expect everyone to obey.
Nay. uS military is not going to do well.
超越？ 中国从根本上说不需要全球部署。因此，美国与中国相比的内在缺陷是从一开始的。由于美国生活水平高，美元即将贬值，因此美国的劳动力成本和零部件成本较高。
这使得允许的美元军事预算变得毫无意义，削弱了美国维持现有国际军事网络模式的能力。
越来越多的美国资金被用于支持现有的行动，而不是更新设备和培训人员。
美国社会不断演变的成本和工作伦理也拖累了美国的实力。
美国的人口构成已经从美国白人占主导地位、团结一致的局面转变为种族构成存在问题、等级忠诚度破坏和内部摩擦不断的局面。
美国的霸权不再具有可持续性。
这也是美国最近几届政府中当选和被任命的人缺乏对自己实际角色的认识的原因。
这就好比上台掌权后，按下电灯开关却发现灯不亮，他既不知道为什么，也不知道如何解决问题，更不知道如何维持这一职能。
只是做做动作，然后继续前进。
从长远来看，没有人知道该做什么，因为整个等级制度都被民选和任命的政客所取代，他们对自己的办公室是如何运作的一无所知。
他们只知道发号施令，指望所有人都服从。
是的，美国军队不会做得很好。
@Jemmy_BengkelKu
Why? Because they sick of west gank bullying they always make an repressed to other week country
为什么？因为他们厌倦了西方的欺凌，西方总是对其他国家进行压制。
@stephenleung9189
China needs only about 6 aircraft carriers which they shall have by 2030, the Chinese navy is for defence purpose, not for invading and controlling the world. If any country is foolish enough to invade China, they will face not only Chinese naval forces, they will also have to consider the coastal defence forces and from the outer islands. The US has only 7 fleets, thus only 7 or 8 serviceable carriers which are stationed all over the world. Some of those are really museum pieces, relics from WWII.
中国只需要大约6艘航母，到2030年他们就会拥有这些航母，中国海军是用来防御的，而不是用来侵略和控制世界的。如果任何国家愚蠢到入侵中国，他们面对的将不仅仅是中国海军，他们还必须考虑沿海的防御力量和外围岛屿。美国只有7个舰队，因此只有7或8艘可用的航空母舰驻扎在世界各地。这些航母中的一些确实是博物馆里的珍品，是二战时期的遗物。
@colberthunter12
So they will be sitting around doing nothing, good to hear, America however will still be using our carriers to same way.
所以它们将无所事事，很高兴听到这个消息，不过美国仍将以同样的方式使用我们的航母。
@colberthunter12
Unlike C junk, America's old carriers are still the best, by the way we just finished building 2 new ones with more to come.
与C垃圾航母不同，美国的旧式航母仍然是最好的，顺便说一下，我们刚刚建造了两艘新航母，而且还会建造更多。
@steventan2550
This is certainly good news for those involved in military equipment manufacturing in the US.
这对在美国从事军事装备制造的人来说无疑是个好消息。
@SaorAlba1970
America has only 2 out of it's 11 supercarriers in active status , the USA has a massive maintenance problem and the assault carriers has similar problems like USS boxer last in service in 2019, it won't be in service again until the end of 2026 and the USS Gerry Ford is already in dock for maintenance
美国的11艘超级航母中只有2艘处于现役状态，美国存在一个巨大的维修问题，攻击型航母也有类似的问题，比如拳师号航母上一次服役是在2019年，它要到2026年底才能再次服役，而格里-福特号航母已经进坞维修了。
@ongsengkee2530
The west should allow China the space to grow and develop. Don't forget that Mao Zedong once said that China couldn't even lob a potato into space what more to threaten other countries. Therefore the west need not have sleepless nights about lobbing potatoes or even tomatoes.
西方应该给中国发展壮大的空间。别忘了，毛泽东曾说过中国连向太空发射一个土豆都做不到，何谈威胁其他国家。因此，西方不必为发射土豆甚至西红柿而寝食难安。
@Mr-hn2bp
ZhuHai Sir Show has been officially renamed as China Air Show.
珠海航展正式更名为中国航展。
@sandpaper4483
You know military spending is what made the ussr fall aprt
要知道军费开支才是苏联垮台的根本原因。
@twilight6460
And it will make the usa fall apart too
它也会让美国分崩离析。
@BrandyHeng007
China 1000 battle ships and submarines vs US 500 nos
中国1000艘战舰和潜艇VS美国500艘。
@RommelGonzales-ke6we
Still made in China lol. USA is good quality
它们仍然是中国制造，笑死我了。美国的质量更好。
@karkisunil3652
We should learn from history, all foreign invasion has hit hard to our country vie maritime combat. We have made great wall but forgot at sea ... now we are making an another wall at sea .....
我们应该以史为鉴，所有的外国入侵都是通过海上来的，对我国造成了沉重的打击。我们筑起了长城，却忘了海上......现在，我们又在海上筑起了一道长城 ....
@Mr-hn2bp
Zhenghe's fleet was big and strong but didn't bully any country nor colonized any.
郑和的舰队很强大，但是他没有欺负过任何国家，也没有殖民过任何国家。
@bchilenje
What would you do if you were China, being surrounded by so many US military bases in your neighborhood?
如果你是中国，周边有这么多美军基地，你会怎么做？
@MASMIWA
Missing from the conversation is China's missile force and army vs the US, Also missing was nothing about submarines, destroyers, frigates, corvettes, LSD, underwater drones, airborne drones, and special forces.
对话中没有提到中国的导弹部队和陆军与美国的对比，也没有提到潜艇、驱逐舰、护卫舰、轻型护卫舰、防空导弹、水下无人机、机载无人机和特种部队。
@karchi12
Does China has the rights to expand her military presence to any parts of the pacific as does the US.?The answer is YES!!
中国是否有权像美国一样将军事力量扩展到太平洋的任何地区？
@stephenleung9189
It looks like it is the US that’s playing catch-up to the Chinese military equipment now. Too bad they don’t have the money and labour force anymore to be competitive enough. They are way behind in ultra sonic missiles and military drones where such weapons are essential to modern warfare. They are still hung up with their WWII relic fleets. They are supposed to have 7 navel fleets, in reality, how many fully equipped and functional fleets can they assemble? 4, or maybe 5?
现在看来是美国在追赶中国的军事装备，可惜他们已经没有足够的资金和劳动力来提高竞争力了。他们在超音速导弹和军用无人机方面远远落后，而这些武器对于现代战争来说是必不可少的。他们仍然沉迷于二战遗留的舰队，他们应该拥有7支海军舰队，但实际上他们能组建多少支装备齐全、功能完善的舰队？4支还是5支？
@raymondancheta2998
I hope that China will triple the number of carriers that they build. STANDING with China.....ALWAYS!!
我希望中国建造的航母数量能增加三倍，我永远与中国站在一起！！！
@COLLAPSE.of.US.ECONOMY
China must take back its island province, Taiwan, as soon as possible.
中国必须尽快收回其岛屿省份台湾（地区）。
@eewinstorn4122
What your channel know is only a small portion. China now have many unseen high tech weapons not reveal yet and only use in times of war
你们频道知道的只是一小部分，中国现在有许多尚未曝光的高科技武器，而且只会在战争时期使用。
@andrewcbartlett
Economically China relies on the USA so will not risk a conflict.
中国在经济上依赖美国，因此不会冒险与美国发生冲突。
@jessicayoung1190
China only export 15% to US . China does not depends on US at all .
中国只向美国出口15%的产品，中国根本不依赖美国。
@ms1crash
War is privileged ppl's game. Weapons are their toys. I just hope power is balanced so the world is peachful. We normal ppl can live a life
战争是特权阶层的游戏，武器是他们的玩具，我只希望权力平衡，世界和平，我们普通人也能过上好日子。
@billyjoesmo8251
China's tanks could fire seven times before the barrel warps causing it to explode�� Malamar and North Korea are the only countries that buy Chinese weapons and they complained that they don't work or their dangerous to the people using them��
中国的坦克可以开七炮，然后炮管就会翘起来导致爆炸。缅甸和朝鲜是唯一购买中国武器的国家，他们抱怨这些武器不能用或者对使用这些武器的人有危险。
@BravoCheesecake
Yes they don't even use Collimator's on their tanks because they know it's pointless to even try to prevent warping Chinese poor quality barrels.
是的，他们甚至不在坦克上使用准直器，因为他们知道即使试图防止中国劣质炮管翘曲也毫无意义。
@yuyu-zr8dn
至少中国试射的洲际导弹是成功，而不象美国导弹还要试射两次，才能证明自己，另外，中国空间站上宇航员是可以按计划回家休假！
@donaldddtrump6663
看来我们的航母还是不够多，当我们拥有20艘航母以后你们就会知道我们才是和平守护者
