2025年十大最致命的核攻击潜艇 | 终极榜单
正文翻译
10. Sierra II Russia 9. Type 093A China 8. Akula class Russia 7. Los Angeles Class USA 6. Suffren France 5. Astute Class UK 4. Type 093B China 3. Yasen Class Russia 2. Virginia Class USA 1. Seawolf Class USA
10. Sierra II Russia 9. Type 093A China 8. Akula class Russia 7. Los Angeles Class USA 6. Suffren France 5. Astute Class UK 4. Type 093B China 3. Yasen Class Russia 2. Virginia Class USA 1. Seawolf Class USA
10. 塞拉II级核潜艇 俄罗斯
9. 093A型核潜艇 中国
8. 阿库拉级核潜艇 俄罗斯
7. 洛杉矶级核潜艇 美国
6. 絮弗伦级核潜艇 法国
5. 机敏级核潜艇 英国
4. 093B型核潜艇 中国
3. 雅森级核潜艇 俄罗斯
2. 弗吉尼亚级核潜艇 美国
1. 海狼级核潜艇 美国
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
We examine the top 10 nuclear attack submarines (SSN) and guided missile submarines (SSGN) in service in 2025. Rankings are subjective and based on judgement using limited open-source information.
我们将审视2025年服役中的十大核攻击潜艇（SSN）和巡航导弹潜艇（SSGN），排名基于有限的公开信息，带有主观判断。
我们将审视2025年服役中的十大核攻击潜艇（SSN）和巡航导弹潜艇（SSGN），排名基于有限的公开信息，带有主观判断。
10. Sierra II Russia 9. Type 093A China 8. Akula class Russia 7. Los Angeles Class USA 6. Suffren France 5. Astute Class UK 4. Type 093B China 3. Yasen Class Russia 2. Virginia Class USA 1. Seawolf Class USA
10. Sierra II Russia 9. Type 093A China 8. Akula class Russia 7. Los Angeles Class USA 6. Suffren France 5. Astute Class UK 4. Type 093B China 3. Yasen Class Russia 2. Virginia Class USA 1. Seawolf Class USA
10. 塞拉II级核潜艇 俄罗斯
9. 093A型核潜艇 中国
8. 阿库拉级核潜艇 俄罗斯
7. 洛杉矶级核潜艇 美国
6. 絮弗伦级核潜艇 法国
5. 机敏级核潜艇 英国
4. 093B型核潜艇 中国
3. 雅森级核潜艇 俄罗斯
2. 弗吉尼亚级核潜艇 美国
1. 海狼级核潜艇 美国
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
评论翻译
@AnonymousSong
India: Where is our Arihant class? That should be the most advance sub in the world!
印度：我们的“歼敌者”级核潜艇在哪里？它应该是世界上最先进的潜艇！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
India: Where is our Arihant class? That should be the most advance sub in the world!
印度：我们的“歼敌者”级核潜艇在哪里？它应该是世界上最先进的潜艇！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@kumbackquatsta
is that the one that sunk because they left a hatch open?
是不是因为舱门没关导致沉没的那艘？
is that the one that sunk because they left a hatch open?
是不是因为舱门没关导致沉没的那艘？
@nicolamastascusa8173
That's an SSBN, not an SSN
那是一艘弹道导弹核潜艇，不是攻击型核潜艇。
That's an SSBN, not an SSN
那是一艘弹道导弹核潜艇，不是攻击型核潜艇。
@caldinacube7490
India: we have the best sub in the world.
Some other Western Country: not really mate, you bought our retired models that was good from 70 years ago
印度：我们拥有世界上最好的潜艇。
某些西方国家：不太好意思啊朋友，你们买的是我们退役的老型号，那可是70年前还算不错的版本。
India: we have the best sub in the world.
Some other Western Country: not really mate, you bought our retired models that was good from 70 years ago
印度：我们拥有世界上最好的潜艇。
某些西方国家：不太好意思啊朋友，你们买的是我们退役的老型号，那可是70年前还算不错的版本。
@fdjw88
India's SSN is not on the list, because it is so advanced that humans simply cannot comprehend its technologies.
印度的SSN之所以不在名单上，是因为它的技术过于先进，以至于人类根本无法理解其中的科技。
India's SSN is not on the list, because it is so advanced that humans simply cannot comprehend its technologies.
印度的SSN之所以不在名单上，是因为它的技术过于先进，以至于人类根本无法理解其中的科技。
@caldinacube7490
@fdjw88 it’s so advanced that humans and the best technology can’t see them. like EVER
@fdjw88 它是如此先进，人类和最尖端的技术永远都无法看到它的存在。
@fdjw88 it’s so advanced that humans and the best technology can’t see them. like EVER
@fdjw88 它是如此先进，人类和最尖端的技术永远都无法看到它的存在。
@johnsmith1953x
@kumbackquatsta That was actually a Ohio class sub.
@kumbackquatsta 那实际上是一艘俄亥俄级潜艇。
@kumbackquatsta That was actually a Ohio class sub.
@kumbackquatsta 那实际上是一艘俄亥俄级潜艇。
@kumbackquatsta
@johnsmith1953x true, but my point still stands lol
@johnsmith1953x 没错，不过我的观点依然成立哈哈
@johnsmith1953x true, but my point still stands lol
@johnsmith1953x 没错，不过我的观点依然成立哈哈
@XkMeng
@kumbackquatsta Maybe they didn't open the hatch, but also sank
或许他们并没有打开舱门，然而仍然沉了下去
@kumbackquatsta Maybe they didn't open the hatch, but also sank
或许他们并没有打开舱门，然而仍然沉了下去
@angelaferkel7922
Really enjoyed this one!
真的很喜欢这个！
Really enjoyed this one!
真的很喜欢这个！
@iamjacobnz
Disappointing that the new china type 041 mini Nuclear submarine not on this list, I know it uses hybrid battery power and not much is known, it may have conventional propulsion as well but it is best because it is actually affordable unlike all the ones on this list.
令人失望的是，新型中国041型微型核潜艇没有出现在这个名单上，据我所知它使用混合电池动力，相关信息不多，可能也采用传统推进系统，但它是最好的选择，因为它的价格实际上更加实惠，而名单中的其他选项都太昂贵了。
Disappointing that the new china type 041 mini Nuclear submarine not on this list, I know it uses hybrid battery power and not much is known, it may have conventional propulsion as well but it is best because it is actually affordable unlike all the ones on this list.
令人失望的是，新型中国041型微型核潜艇没有出现在这个名单上，据我所知它使用混合电池动力，相关信息不多，可能也采用传统推进系统，但它是最好的选择，因为它的价格实际上更加实惠，而名单中的其他选项都太昂贵了。
@TingfuZhou
There is a lack of sufficient public parameters to uate 041's capabilities.
缺乏足够的公开参数来评估041的能力。
There is a lack of sufficient public parameters to uate 041's capabilities.
缺乏足够的公开参数来评估041的能力。
@angelaferkel7922
Not enough infos about it
关于它的信息不够充分。
Not enough infos about it
关于它的信息不够充分。
@chadbernard2641
Great video. I would disagree and say the Yasen-M would be number 1 The first boat was so quiet it made the US navy super nervous. The new ones are even quieter than the first. The Yasen-M also carries the Zircon missile which puts on a separate level than any other submarine in the world.
很棒的视频！不过我持不同意见，我认为亚森-M应该排第一。第一艘潜艇的静音效果非常优异，甚至让美国海军都感到极度紧张，而新的亚森-M潜艇比第一艘还要安静。此外，亚森-M还装备了锆石导弹，这使它达到了全球任何其他潜艇无法企及的全新高度。
Great video. I would disagree and say the Yasen-M would be number 1 The first boat was so quiet it made the US navy super nervous. The new ones are even quieter than the first. The Yasen-M also carries the Zircon missile which puts on a separate level than any other submarine in the world.
很棒的视频！不过我持不同意见，我认为亚森-M应该排第一。第一艘潜艇的静音效果非常优异，甚至让美国海军都感到极度紧张，而新的亚森-M潜艇比第一艘还要安静。此外，亚森-M还装备了锆石导弹，这使它达到了全球任何其他潜艇无法企及的全新高度。
@eymeeraosaka2954
The Seawolf(1997) and Virginia Class(2004) are so old and yet they are ranked 1st and 2nd...Are you sure? The Russian Yasen Class(2013) 3rd? And the Chinese Type 34B(2022) ranked 4th? Don't tell me American technology is so far ahead of the Russian and Chinese? What about speed and depth?
海狼级（1997年）和弗吉尼亚级（2004年）都已经这么老了，却仍然排在第一和第二位……你确定吗？俄罗斯的亚森级（2013年）排第三？而中国的Type 34B（2022年）排第四？别告诉我美国的技术真的比俄罗斯和中国领先这么多，速度和潜深又如何呢？
The Seawolf(1997) and Virginia Class(2004) are so old and yet they are ranked 1st and 2nd...Are you sure? The Russian Yasen Class(2013) 3rd? And the Chinese Type 34B(2022) ranked 4th? Don't tell me American technology is so far ahead of the Russian and Chinese? What about speed and depth?
海狼级（1997年）和弗吉尼亚级（2004年）都已经这么老了，却仍然排在第一和第二位……你确定吗？俄罗斯的亚森级（2013年）排第三？而中国的Type 34B（2022年）排第四？别告诉我美国的技术真的比俄罗斯和中国领先这么多，速度和潜深又如何呢？
@feliscorax
Depth, yes, that can be advantageous. Speed, generally not: the faster a submarine travels through the water, the more friction is generated by the water rushing past its hull, thus the greater the noise in the water. The result is two-fold: first, it compromises the submarines main purpose, which is to glide stealthily through the water and remain undetected; and, second, the noise generated has the tendency to deafen the submarine’s onboard sonar and other sensors to what’s going on around it, thereby negating its main purpose of detecting and tracking other submarines. In other words, those are not particularly relevant criteria to whether or not a submarine is any good or not. For pure noise reduction, and for its ability to track other submarines at distance without being detected in return, the amount of disrespect shown to the Astute-class on this video is flabbergasting.
深度确实可以成为一种优势，但速度通常不行，因为潜艇在水中航行得越快，水流经过艇体时产生的摩擦力就越大，从而导致水中噪声越多。这会带来两方面的后果：一方面，它削弱了潜艇的主要功能，即安静地潜行并保持隐蔽；另一方面，这种噪声会干扰潜艇上的声呐和其他传感器，使它们无法有效感知周围环境，从而抵消了潜艇探测和追踪其他潜艇的核心目的。换句话说，这些因素并不能真正决定一艘潜艇的优劣。对于纯粹的噪声控制能力，以及在远距离条件下成功追踪其他潜艇而无需担心被反过来探测的能力来说，视频中对于“机敏级”潜艇的轻视实在令人震惊。
Depth, yes, that can be advantageous. Speed, generally not: the faster a submarine travels through the water, the more friction is generated by the water rushing past its hull, thus the greater the noise in the water. The result is two-fold: first, it compromises the submarines main purpose, which is to glide stealthily through the water and remain undetected; and, second, the noise generated has the tendency to deafen the submarine’s onboard sonar and other sensors to what’s going on around it, thereby negating its main purpose of detecting and tracking other submarines. In other words, those are not particularly relevant criteria to whether or not a submarine is any good or not. For pure noise reduction, and for its ability to track other submarines at distance without being detected in return, the amount of disrespect shown to the Astute-class on this video is flabbergasting.
深度确实可以成为一种优势，但速度通常不行，因为潜艇在水中航行得越快，水流经过艇体时产生的摩擦力就越大，从而导致水中噪声越多。这会带来两方面的后果：一方面，它削弱了潜艇的主要功能，即安静地潜行并保持隐蔽；另一方面，这种噪声会干扰潜艇上的声呐和其他传感器，使它们无法有效感知周围环境，从而抵消了潜艇探测和追踪其他潜艇的核心目的。换句话说，这些因素并不能真正决定一艘潜艇的优劣。对于纯粹的噪声控制能力，以及在远距离条件下成功追踪其他潜艇而无需担心被反过来探测的能力来说，视频中对于“机敏级”潜艇的轻视实在令人震惊。
@gimme88
what if you did a video about these subs accomplishments in actual wars? i asked AI if a submarine sunk a ship during the "falkands war" (uk vs argentina) and this was the answer:
"Yes, a ship was sunk by a submarine during the Falklands War. The British nuclear-powered submarine HMS Conqueror sank the Argentine cruiser ARA General Belgrano on May 2, 1982, with the loss of 323 lives. This was the only ship sunk during military operations by a nuclear-powered submarine and the second sunk in action by any type of submarine since World War II."
--- Also there was heavy use of airforce by both sides and missions against ships by both sides who used aircraft for these missions. I think a video about the falkands war would be very interesting and educational for people. Just a suggestion, since there is lots of video footage of this war.
如果你制作一个视频讲述这些潜艇在实际战争中的战绩会怎么样？我问了AI是否有潜艇在“福克兰群岛战争”（英国对阿根廷）中击沉过船只，以下是AI的回答：
“是的，在福克兰群岛战争期间，有一艘船被潜艇击沉。英国的核动力潜艇‘征服者号’（HMS Conqueror）于1982年5月2日击沉了阿根廷的巡洋舰‘贝尔格拉诺将军号’（ARA General Belgrano），导致323人丧生。这是军事行动中唯一一次由核动力潜艇击沉战舰，也是自二战以来第二次任何类型的潜艇在行动中击沉战舰。”
此外，双方在战争中都对空军有大量使用，双方的飞机也执行了针对船只的任务。我认为一个关于福克兰群岛战争的视频会非常有趣并且对人们具有很大的教育意义。这只是一个建议，因为关于这场战争有很多视频镜头可以使用。
what if you did a video about these subs accomplishments in actual wars? i asked AI if a submarine sunk a ship during the "falkands war" (uk vs argentina) and this was the answer:
"Yes, a ship was sunk by a submarine during the Falklands War. The British nuclear-powered submarine HMS Conqueror sank the Argentine cruiser ARA General Belgrano on May 2, 1982, with the loss of 323 lives. This was the only ship sunk during military operations by a nuclear-powered submarine and the second sunk in action by any type of submarine since World War II."
--- Also there was heavy use of airforce by both sides and missions against ships by both sides who used aircraft for these missions. I think a video about the falkands war would be very interesting and educational for people. Just a suggestion, since there is lots of video footage of this war.
如果你制作一个视频讲述这些潜艇在实际战争中的战绩会怎么样？我问了AI是否有潜艇在“福克兰群岛战争”（英国对阿根廷）中击沉过船只，以下是AI的回答：
“是的，在福克兰群岛战争期间，有一艘船被潜艇击沉。英国的核动力潜艇‘征服者号’（HMS Conqueror）于1982年5月2日击沉了阿根廷的巡洋舰‘贝尔格拉诺将军号’（ARA General Belgrano），导致323人丧生。这是军事行动中唯一一次由核动力潜艇击沉战舰，也是自二战以来第二次任何类型的潜艇在行动中击沉战舰。”
此外，双方在战争中都对空军有大量使用，双方的飞机也执行了针对船只的任务。我认为一个关于福克兰群岛战争的视频会非常有趣并且对人们具有很大的教育意义。这只是一个建议，因为关于这场战争有很多视频镜头可以使用。
@hdnddiv5213
What will happen if a nuclear submarine got destroyed at the sea? Will the reactor contaminate the water or it has safety measures?
如果一艘核潜艇在海上被摧毁，会发生什么呢？核反应堆会污染海水还是有相应的安全措施？
What will happen if a nuclear submarine got destroyed at the sea? Will the reactor contaminate the water or it has safety measures?
如果一艘核潜艇在海上被摧毁，会发生什么呢？核反应堆会污染海水还是有相应的安全措施？
@tzenzhongguo
Good question I was always wondering about that.
好问题，我一直都在疑惑这个。
Good question I was always wondering about that.
好问题，我一直都在疑惑这个。
@iamjacobnz
Yeah it good question, I think they claim the containment vessels keep it safe but idk
是的，这是个好问题，我想他们声称安全性是由防护容器保障的，但我也不太确定。
Yeah it good question, I think they claim the containment vessels keep it safe but idk
是的，这是个好问题，我想他们声称安全性是由防护容器保障的，但我也不太确定。
@gelinrefira
Very nearby. But for the whole ocean, probably not much.
非常接近了，但对于整个海洋来说可能影响不大。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Very nearby. But for the whole ocean, probably not much.
非常接近了，但对于整个海洋来说可能影响不大。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@JumanZj
Yeah thats why is a bad for the sea
是的，这就是对海洋有害的原因。
Yeah thats why is a bad for the sea
是的，这就是对海洋有害的原因。
@xingxingliu3551
The Soviet unx once lost a submarine near Finland and was unable to deal with it. The United States was aware of it but chose to remain silent, focusing solely on salvage efforts, though unsuccessfully. For politicians, the pollution caused by a nuclear submarine is negligible. However, its acoustic signature is a critical piece of information that could reveal important data about the submarine. They would go to great lengths to negotiate and maneuver over it. Fascinating, isn't it?
苏联以前在芬兰那边掉了一艘潜艇，无法处理。美国也知道，但是不说，只是一味的打捞，但是未成功。对于政治家，核潜艇的污染微乎其微，但是声纹，这个会暴露核潜艇的重要数据，他们会拼了命的为其博弈。很有意思是吧
The Soviet unx once lost a submarine near Finland and was unable to deal with it. The United States was aware of it but chose to remain silent, focusing solely on salvage efforts, though unsuccessfully. For politicians, the pollution caused by a nuclear submarine is negligible. However, its acoustic signature is a critical piece of information that could reveal important data about the submarine. They would go to great lengths to negotiate and maneuver over it. Fascinating, isn't it?
苏联以前在芬兰那边掉了一艘潜艇，无法处理。美国也知道，但是不说，只是一味的打捞，但是未成功。对于政治家，核潜艇的污染微乎其微，但是声纹，这个会暴露核潜艇的重要数据，他们会拼了命的为其博弈。很有意思是吧
@interpl6089
It doesn't do major contamination. The radiation is shielded by water and the nuclear fuel (material) stays largely where it sinks. Good example would be reading what happened to the Submarine Kursk.
它不会造成重大污染，辐射被水层屏蔽，核燃料（物质）大体上会沉降在原地，一个很好的例子是可以了解一下库尔斯克号潜艇的事件经过。
It doesn't do major contamination. The radiation is shielded by water and the nuclear fuel (material) stays largely where it sinks. Good example would be reading what happened to the Submarine Kursk.
它不会造成重大污染，辐射被水层屏蔽，核燃料（物质）大体上会沉降在原地，一个很好的例子是可以了解一下库尔斯克号潜艇的事件经过。
@jason59k55
not much. containment vessel is extremely strong and even if the whole reactor leaks the water is such an extraordinarily good radiation absorber and distillant that little will happen besides nearby. fuel is also very heavily and will likely not spread much
没什么大不了的，反应堆的安全壳非常坚固，即使整个反应堆泄漏，水作为一种极其出色的辐射吸收剂和蒸馏剂，除了附近区域之外几乎不会产生什么影响，而燃料本身也非常重，很可能不会扩散太多。
not much. containment vessel is extremely strong and even if the whole reactor leaks the water is such an extraordinarily good radiation absorber and distillant that little will happen besides nearby. fuel is also very heavily and will likely not spread much
没什么大不了的，反应堆的安全壳非常坚固，即使整个反应堆泄漏，水作为一种极其出色的辐射吸收剂和蒸馏剂，除了附近区域之外几乎不会产生什么影响，而燃料本身也非常重，很可能不会扩散太多。
@kumbackquatsta
the seawolf is coming to a sea mount near you
海狼号潜艇即将抵达你附近的海底山脉
the seawolf is coming to a sea mount near you
海狼号潜艇即将抵达你附近的海底山脉
@interpl6089
You didn't mention Russian subs have windows (as in actual windows)...
你没有提到俄罗斯潜艇上居然有“窗口”（就是真实的窗口）...
You didn't mention Russian subs have windows (as in actual windows)...
你没有提到俄罗斯潜艇上居然有“窗口”（就是真实的窗口）...
@chandrachurniyogi8394
the Akula class could do with a new more modern Akula IV class . . . clean sheet design based on silhouette of the original Akula . . .
阿库拉级潜艇或许可以更新为更现代化的阿库拉IV级，基于原阿库拉轮廓进行重新设计打造全新方案。
the Akula class could do with a new more modern Akula IV class . . . clean sheet design based on silhouette of the original Akula . . .
阿库拉级潜艇或许可以更新为更现代化的阿库拉IV级，基于原阿库拉轮廓进行重新设计打造全新方案。
@Kevin-hx2ky
That's the Laika's job
那就是莱卡的职责所在。
That's the Laika's job
那就是莱卡的职责所在。
@sctonio1466
Seawolf is only no.2, no.1 is China's new unmapped underwater mountain off the coast of Hainan!
海狼级潜艇只能排第二，第一是中国在海南附近发现的全新未标注的水下山脉！/笑哭
Seawolf is only no.2, no.1 is China's new unmapped underwater mountain off the coast of Hainan!
海狼级潜艇只能排第二，第一是中国在海南附近发现的全新未标注的水下山脉！/笑哭
@stc2828
I don’t think Seawolf is anywhere close to being the best sub at this time. It doesn’t have any VLS, the firepower is seriously lacking.
我认为海狼级潜艇目前根本算不上最好的潜艇，它没有垂直发射系统，火力严重不足。
I don’t think Seawolf is anywhere close to being the best sub at this time. It doesn’t have any VLS, the firepower is seriously lacking.
我认为海狼级潜艇目前根本算不上最好的潜艇，它没有垂直发射系统，火力严重不足。
@christophmahler
It's the wrong list.
Because it doesn't account for build and recruitment times...
If it is not just a list, but a ranking, then what is the criteria ? Construction year ? Top Speed ? Displacement ? Length ?...
02:20 there no costs for maintaining Titanium hulls as the metal doesn't erode - their initial expense is five times higher than steel and requires welding of parts in a chamber filled with Argon gas...
00:15 'These vessels have unlimited range and endurance.'
Crew: 'weeesooohungry!!!'
Captian Ahab:'we must venture on !'
这份列表不正确，因为它没有考虑建造和招募所需的时间。如果不仅仅是一个列表，而是一个排名，那评判标准是什么？建造年份、最高航速、排水量还是长度？在02:20提到钛合金船身没有维护成本，因为这种金属不会腐蚀，但其初始费用是钢的五倍，而且焊接部件需要在充满氩气的密闭环境中完成。00:15提到“这些舰艇有无限的航程和续航能力。”
船员们：“我们饿得不行了！”
船长亚哈：“我们必须继续前进！”
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It's the wrong list.
Because it doesn't account for build and recruitment times...
If it is not just a list, but a ranking, then what is the criteria ? Construction year ? Top Speed ? Displacement ? Length ?...
02:20 there no costs for maintaining Titanium hulls as the metal doesn't erode - their initial expense is five times higher than steel and requires welding of parts in a chamber filled with Argon gas...
00:15 'These vessels have unlimited range and endurance.'
Crew: 'weeesooohungry!!!'
Captian Ahab:'we must venture on !'
这份列表不正确，因为它没有考虑建造和招募所需的时间。如果不仅仅是一个列表，而是一个排名，那评判标准是什么？建造年份、最高航速、排水量还是长度？在02:20提到钛合金船身没有维护成本，因为这种金属不会腐蚀，但其初始费用是钢的五倍，而且焊接部件需要在充满氩气的密闭环境中完成。00:15提到“这些舰艇有无限的航程和续航能力。”
船员们：“我们饿得不行了！”
船长亚哈：“我们必须继续前进！”
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@AmrRabie-b1h
Yasn better than sea wolf and Virginia even akula is better than los anglos
亚森级潜艇比海狼级和弗吉尼亚级更优秀，甚至阿库拉级都比洛杉矶级强。
Yasn better than sea wolf and Virginia even akula is better than los anglos
亚森级潜艇比海狼级和弗吉尼亚级更优秀，甚至阿库拉级都比洛杉矶级强。
@user-vi8sh3tk3p
your data not correct , yasn much better than sea wolf and vergeina in weapons , noise level and sonar
你的数据不正确，Yasn在武器、噪音水平和声呐方面远优于Sea Wolf和Vergeina。
your data not correct , yasn much better than sea wolf and vergeina in weapons , noise level and sonar
你的数据不正确，Yasn在武器、噪音水平和声呐方面远优于Sea Wolf和Vergeina。
@s.porter8646
Hahahahaha vox
哈哈哈哈哈，Vox。 （本频道和福克斯合起来的词）
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Hahahahaha vox
哈哈哈哈哈，Vox。 （本频道和福克斯合起来的词）
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@iamjacobnz
China made nuclear torpedo but smaller and cheaper than Russia's one, not submarine by most people definition but definitely capable, imagine being chased by torpedo that never run out of fuel or get tired!
中国制造了核鱼雷，体型更小、成本更低于俄罗斯的版本，虽然按照大多数人的定义它并不是潜艇，但绝对性能强大，想象一下被一个永远不会耗尽燃料或疲惫的鱼雷追逐的场景吧！
China made nuclear torpedo but smaller and cheaper than Russia's one, not submarine by most people definition but definitely capable, imagine being chased by torpedo that never run out of fuel or get tired!
中国制造了核鱼雷，体型更小、成本更低于俄罗斯的版本，虽然按照大多数人的定义它并不是潜艇，但绝对性能强大，想象一下被一个永远不会耗尽燃料或疲惫的鱼雷追逐的场景吧！
@SerbanChiribau
You made a list that was finished without any voice subsites or AI-generated content. That's really disappointing.
你做了一个列表，但却没有加入任何语音子页面或AI生成的内容，真的让人很失望。
You made a list that was finished without any voice subsites or AI-generated content. That's really disappointing.
你做了一个列表，但却没有加入任何语音子页面或AI生成的内容，真的让人很失望。
@parallax9084
Belgorod?
别尔哥罗德？
Belgorod?
别尔哥罗德？
@andrew6815
that's not an attack sub
那不是攻击型潜艇
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
that's not an attack sub
那不是攻击型潜艇
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@bashirhasanbony6065
Where is belgorod submarine?
别尔哥罗德号潜艇在哪里？
Where is belgorod submarine?
别尔哥罗德号潜艇在哪里？
@andrew6815
not an attack sub
这不是一艘攻击潜艇。
not an attack sub
这不是一艘攻击潜艇。
@champaberiasub4809
Where is ins arihanth
阿里汉号在哪里？
Where is ins arihanth
阿里汉号在哪里？
@eajaykumar
It's ssbn not ssn
这是“SSBN”（核攻击潜艇）而不是“SSN”（战略核潜艇）。
It's ssbn not ssn
这是“SSBN”（核攻击潜艇）而不是“SSN”（战略核潜艇）。
@AlexanderLehmann-c6z
@eajaykumar It's something in between SSN & SSBN!
@eajaykumar 这介于攻击型核潜艇和弹道导弹核潜艇之间的某种类型！
@eajaykumar It's something in between SSN & SSBN!
@eajaykumar 这介于攻击型核潜艇和弹道导弹核潜艇之间的某种类型！
@DJs021
Is that the one with the hatch open while diving? The sub is classified unrepairable, now sitting at museum
这是那个在潜水时舱门打开的潜艇吗？这艘潜艇现在已被评定为无法修复，成为博物馆的一部分。
Is that the one with the hatch open while diving? The sub is classified unrepairable, now sitting at museum
这是那个在潜水时舱门打开的潜艇吗？这艘潜艇现在已被评定为无法修复，成为博物馆的一部分。
@kumbackquatsta
@DJs021 the national jai shri ram museum of idiocy
@DJs021 国家级“胜利万岁”白痴博物馆
@DJs021 the national jai shri ram museum of idiocy
@DJs021 国家级“胜利万岁”白痴博物馆
@DISTINGUISHED.GENTLEMAN.
China decided not to help Russia during its time of need, will Russia help China when NATO starts a war against it ?
中国在俄需要帮助时选择不援助，那么当北约对中国发动战争时，俄罗斯会选择帮助中国吗？
China decided not to help Russia during its time of need, will Russia help China when NATO starts a war against it ?
中国在俄需要帮助时选择不援助，那么当北约对中国发动战争时，俄罗斯会选择帮助中国吗？
@ronhuang5712
I smell a jeet.
我闻到了一丝印度味道。
I smell a jeet.
我闻到了一丝印度味道。
@DJs021
Is NATO the entire army more than 2million personnel? If not, don't talk about NATO starting war with China, or the worst case, there will be more "Connecticut" incidents happen more often
北约总兵力是否超过200万人？如果不是，就不要谈论与中国开战的问题，否则在最糟糕的情况下，会有更多类似“康涅狄格号事件”的事情频繁发生。
Is NATO the entire army more than 2million personnel? If not, don't talk about NATO starting war with China, or the worst case, there will be more "Connecticut" incidents happen more often
北约总兵力是否超过200万人？如果不是，就不要谈论与中国开战的问题，否则在最糟糕的情况下，会有更多类似“康涅狄格号事件”的事情频繁发生。
@BigOrangeMan
are living under a rock all this time?
你一直以来都对这些视而不见吗？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
are living under a rock all this time?
你一直以来都对这些视而不见吗？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@jason59k55
you think russia will be left alone when nato attacks? besides, russia has had no "time of need."
你觉得当北约进攻时俄罗斯会被孤立吗？况且，俄罗斯也从来没有真正的“危机时刻”。
you think russia will be left alone when nato attacks? besides, russia has had no "time of need."
你觉得当北约进攻时俄罗斯会被孤立吗？况且，俄罗斯也从来没有真正的“危机时刻”。
@marcodelguerra
Seawolf and Virgina steel uses 1980's weapons...YASEN RULES! soooo disappointed you Sr!
海狼级和弗吉尼亚级潜艇仍在使用1980年代的武器……亚森级才是真正的王者！对你们这些人真的太失望了！
Seawolf and Virgina steel uses 1980's weapons...YASEN RULES! soooo disappointed you Sr!
海狼级和弗吉尼亚级潜艇仍在使用1980年代的武器……亚森级才是真正的王者！对你们这些人真的太失望了！
@9Below
Yasen M is the best
亚森M是最棒的。
Yasen M is the best
亚森M是最棒的。
很赞 9
收藏